Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘ROSATOM’

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

Industry and the media are controlled by banks. And so is our Perception. They produce a mass psychosis in the perception of people to play down any war and any disaster. Strategic misinterpretation by embedding artificial DAMAGE into natural RISKS.

 

de-perception2

de-perception

 

 

NuclearBanks

Read Full Post »

not until 2016, at the earliest, will we know the full number of those likely to develop serious medical conditions.” former Secretary-General Kofi Annan http://www.un.org/ha/chernobyl/docs/sgsm7778.htm

 

Yury Bandazhevsky said that Chernobyl began and is not over: http://www.king5.com/news/nation-now/exiled-scientist-chernobyl-is-not-finished-it-has-only-just-begun/138546166targe

this is the inside of central hall of Chernobyl reactor 4. Below is the 2,000 tons lid, which was blown aside. still there today. Below the lid is the (empty) reactor vault.vzryv_na_chetvertom_bloke

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion12

In this article you will learn things never heard before. They sound absurd, crazy. But these things have official sources. Partly even of the nuclear industry itself.

You, reader deserve the truth. I think you are someone who believes the following, as do 99 % of all people: Chernobyl 4 exploded 1986. It was a meltdown. It irradiated parts of Europe and the World. You probably know that a new sarcophagus is being built right now in Ukraine. A Shell as big as the statue of liberty above and around the ruin. Liquidators were there, connstructing the first sarcophagus in 1986. You probably believe people died, how many you don’t know. And now it’s 30 years since then.That’s what you know, what you believe.

Are you ready? For one of the biggest lies in human history, along with the lies of TEPCO Japan. And IAEA. And UNSCEAR.

unscear-chernobyl
All say: Meltdown. A meltdown is a theoretical assumption. It helps to keep evacuation and compensation small. Because Meltdown means: Only 2 – 5 percent of the radioactive inventory / the core, escaped the reactor. It is a theory. It helps the industry to survive.

Here are facts with Sources next to them / below.

  1. The core of almost all reactors worldwide consists of Uranium Oxide (UO²). Chernobyl was a double core, seperated hydrauligcally. Making this thing 190 tons heavy. This data is from NRC. It says, each Kg consisted of 2 % Unraium 235 enrichment – which can be used for bombs. Reactors use it to become critical, or to operate – in other words. Did you know that? For example each german reactor is a so called MOX reactor. The number of MOX reactors worldwide increase. Sometimes they are fed with weapons plutonium. But this is only wishy washy. They consume it to become critical. But each reactor produces 250 kg Plutonium per year and unit, worldwide. If plutonium enriched or Uranium 235 enriched. Ok, so there were 450 Kg Plutonium in Chernobyl – from the beginning there were 450 kg Uranium 235. Do you know how much Plutonium was used for Nagasaki and how much Uranium 235 was used for Hiroshima? Answer: 64 Kg Uranium 235 for Hiroshima and 6,2 Kg Plutonium for Nagasaki. Your average reactor contains a lot of bombs in its core, Chernobyl even 100% more. It contains the radioactivity of 1,000 Hiroshima bombs, or 15 billion curie (Source: NIRS). Its “only” enriched, but reactors are nothing else than decelerated nuclear bombs.

Sources: http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML0716/ML071690245.pdf and: http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/Artikel%20zu%20Tschernobyl%20in%20Nuclear%20Technology%20Vol%2090.pdf

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion29

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion28

2. The plutonium isotopes in different reactor types (Chernobyl is RBMK):

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion31

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion25

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion26

3. Let’s make a shortcut: What happened at Cherobyl 4?

I quote in all points this study, published by Nuclear Technology paper, in 1990: http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/Artikel%20zu%20Tschernobyl%20in%20Nuclear%20Technology%20Vol%2090.pdf

The Chernobyl Core was 190 tons of Uranium Oxide UO².

Each Kg consisted of 2,4 g of Uranium 235. To make the reactor work. This is the situation in each reactor worldwide. To get it run, beginning of life fuel needs this. After a certain period there is Plutonium in the reactor. For Chernobyl it makes 450 Kg Pu239 all together in both halves of the Core.

Ca. 250 Kg Pu239 in normal reactors. With smaller cores. The core was split in two halves, together 10 m length. An electromechanical experiment was started.

Purpose: Could a tripped generator maintain the electrical feed to the main circulation pumps during generator coast down?

Reactivity was reduced.

Security System was blocked, so was the >automatic< scram.

Both turbo generators were shut down.

The behaviour of Chernobyl is similiar to Fast Breeder Reactors (Sodium / lead cooled), also in terms of void coefficient.

The loss of pumping power induced by the experiment caused a rapid fail in pressure, so the water began to boil, at the bottom of the reactor and even at the inlet of the water! The reactor was unstable.

The crew pushed the button of the Emergency Protection System:

The water lies between the moderator (graphite) and the fuel. It captures thermal neutrons. It is more like a neutron shield than an additional moderator. The energy once stored in the fuel was transferred to the coolant.

It continued to boil and saturate and steam and water met very hot surfaces:

So the first explosion occurred and set the reactor dry – this can be described as steam / hydrogen explosion, BUT that was not was the reactor destroyed. Not, what the reactor lid has thrown aside, not what destroyed the reactor hall.

The first explosion had an energy of 200 Gigajoules. All water was expelled from the reactor. All fuel channels became dry. And Water was pushed back into the inlet and the steam drum seperators.

A DRY reactor heats up 100°C (180°F) evey 0,1 seconds! At the same time nuclear reactions take place, NEUTRONS – just below the speed of light. No chance for Reactor Emergency Systems:

100Degrees-All_0_1-Seconds

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion06

A dry reactor heats up 100°C every 0,1 seconds.

The Doppler Effect was saturated. Phase transition was faster than the heating. NO MELTDOWN.

You would need “only” 50 Gigajoules to boil all that water.

Xenon build up. The reactor poisoned itself. But that was not the main cause for the next events:

The Void Coefficient increased. More than 5 $. This is higher than the total antireactivity of the Doppler effect.

A final supercritical state was achieved – This is nothing else than a nuclear Explosion / reaction of the Reactor Type. This principle is known since the first graphite gas cooled reactors were build.

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion10

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion20

NRC official: http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML0716/ML071690245.pdf 

Fuel Disaggregation requires very high energy: More than 250 Gigajoules.

The crew pushed the Scram Button AZ5. Control rods moved it. They needed 10 seconds, which took much too long. Only a small number of them reached the core.

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion42-2

2 seconds later the Nuclear Explosion / Reaction occurred. This one was 1,000 Gigajoules = 1 Terrajoule. This is the equivalent of 200 – 300 Tons of TNT, or just the yield of a U.S. nuclear W54 warhead.

chernobyl-summary

This nuclear warhead existed and was actually tested. It`s yield: 250 Tons TNT, or, in other words: 1,12 Terrajoule. Exactly the amount of Energy Chernobyl`s two explosions had (one setting the core dry, the other destroying it):

LINK of the 250 tons (0,25 kilotons TNT) Warhead: http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/m-26.html

The U.S. NUREG-1250 report, the official U.S. analyses says in Figure 4.3: 1,400 calories energy were deposited into each gram of reactor fuel UO². That is exactly the 1 Terrajoule: http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML0716/ML071690245.pdf

The fuel was damaged. Each explosion took 1 second.

It included Shock Waves, Cladding rupture, Fuel fragmentation, Phase transition, and as an eye witness said, a blue flash.

The fuel can become vaporized (official NRC data):

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion21

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion22

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion23

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion24

If 65 % of the fuel is smeared that means the reactor is prompt supercritical = Nuclear explosion / reaction. This is called bigger than 1 $.

The total power of the reactor at the time of its destruction was 47,000 % over normal.

This all happened in 1 second.

Fast neutron reactions happen 1,000 times faster than any chemical or physical reaction.

A steam explosion was not possible anymore. At high temperatures steam ionizes into hydrogen and oxygen. Both do not explode at temperatures above 2,000 / 2,100°C:

Reaching 4,000 – 5,000°C these temperatures were no longer chemical, they were nuclear. Officials tell us: “Chernobyl was a hydrogen / steam explosion” – maybe the first one. But with the heating up, it became too hot for these kind of explosions. Don Arnott (below) said: At these temperatures steam ionizes and dissociates into the gases oxygen and hydrogen. These detonating gases do not explode above 2,000 / 2,100 °C.

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion13

ram-cherno

The phase transition Uranium Oxide core flew like a turbo jet engine into the air, ca. 20 – 30 m above the central hall and exploded in a nuclear explosion of the reactor type. The temperatures reached at this moment: 40,000°C.

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion43

But the Temperature of the Chernobyl nuclear explosion was 100,000 times lower (10,000,000%) than the nuclear explosion of the bomb type.

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion33

“Two different models of the nuclear explosions are known. According to, the core of the Chernobyl reactor transformed to a turbo-jet solid-phase engine after a very short initial overheating of fuel. It flied like a missile from the reactor vault to the central reactor hall by the hydrodynamic forces of gas-phase streams flushing down from the fuel channels. Then it exploded as an atomic bomb in the spaceof the central hall.” source: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr79/kr79pdf/Malko1.pdfchernobyl-nuclear-explosion34

No water has enough thermal conductivity for that.

This exceeds every safety system human can design and build.

The not welded lid has a weight of 2,000 tons. It was superheated during the explosion and neutron activity. It was seen from the helicopter crew and IAEA as well as soviet officials misinterpreted it as fuel in melting process. Steel glows cherry red at Temperatures 770°C to 800°C and yellow at Temperatures 1,150°C to 1,250°C.

The paint is also still there. It survive a max. Temp. of 300°C.

The thermal observation showed no melting process and no graphite fire.

29438

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion34b

chernobyl4

IAEA says 96% of the fuel is still in the reactor. But it is not.

In September 1986 126 tons of graphite and 26 tons of fuel were removed from roofs at Chernobyl plant site.

If much Boron is used in western reactors, similar over moderated situations can happen.

Western reactors avoid explosions, via cooking and steaming the reactor cores and letting the aerolized inventory fly through the safety relief valves (SRVs). It`s like a pressure cooker.

NUREG 1250 also speaks of “aerolized” fuel particles after phase transition, on page 6-7.

The industry simply avoids the term “nuclear explosion in a reactor” and simply calls it: “prompt critical excursion.” That`s all.

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion35

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion36

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion37

“an average operating nuclear power reactor will have approximately 16 billion curies in its reactor core. This is the equivalent long-lived radioactivity of at least 1,000 Hiroshima bombs.” http://www.nirs.org/factsheets/routineradioactivereleases.htm

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion39

Vladimir M. Chernousenko, Scientific Director of the Ukrainian Academy of Sciences  Institute of Physics in Kiev’s Task Force for the  Rectification of the Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident- HE SAID:

“Radiation emission was no less that 80% of the core (with a total of 192 tons), which amounted to 6.4 x 10^9 Ci (Ci = Curie = 37,000,000,000 becquerel) If we divide the figure by the population of the whole earth (4.6 x 10^9 people) then we get 1 Ci per person.”

http://www.ratical.org/radiation/Chernobyl/ChernobylIftI.html

“15m³ of radioactive substances emitted from Block 4 at this time could be diluted in 15 x 5 x 10,000,000,000,000 km³ if water, In 100 years 15,000 km³ would be needed. In 1,000 years 15 km³ would be the required amount. For comparsion: the total outflow of the world`s rivers is 36,380 km³.” Dilution is just another word for retransmission. More radiation for everyone.

970449913

The Temperature reached more than 2,000°C degrees – reaching 47,000 % POWER!

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion01

A steam explosion can not develop 1,2 Terrajoule. Steam explosion’s Maxium -> 50 Gigajoules. But the explosion lifted the 2,000 tons lid away, and then even destroyed the reactor hall! How powerful is that. Only a maximum of 10 to 50 Gigajoule of Energy are possible by a Steam explosion in Chernobyl – it was the water expelled from Reactor 4:

no-hydrogen1

Source: http://books.google.de/books?id=vgwAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA65#v=onepage&q&f=false

Other sources say: H. van Dam. says: “900 Gigajoules”: http://iopscience.iop.org/0034-4885/55/11/003

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion09

checherov-imanaka

image from: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/seminar/IS/Imanaka20120627.pdf

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion11

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion03

Yes: 1,400 Cal/gm (calories per gram) are 1,1 Terrajoules = equivalent of 0,2 – 0,3 Kilotons TNT.

There was not enough water, power in water, to create so a high energy explosion, for the 2nd one. This was nuclear.

W54 nuclear warhead is the energy yield equivalent of Chernobyl explosion (0,2 – 0,3 KT TNT):

NRC: http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML0716/ML071690245.pdf 

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion02

Footage from the inside of Reactor 4:

There is this interview with a scientist who was with russian Checherov in reactor 4:

Source: http://www.taz.de/!82695/

Here they can be seen: Walking around the empty reactor:

 

wwwsouzchernobylorg

AN Kiselev, Chernobyl, 1986, block 3: “Power of gamma radiation from a channel, lying on the roof of the third block measured by Zherdev was 2 Sievert per Hour (the limit of the measuring range of the instrument DP-5V ) at a distance of three meters” / “we had to work in an environment where radiation levels could exceed the 10 Sievert per Hour and even higher” / “As soon as the rotary drill bit to the fuel clusters, fuel chips along with the water got into the room , and immediately dramatically increased gamma-ray background” / “Biological protection of the camera has been redesigned in accordance with the requirements of radiation safety.” / “On the tube sites were about 15-20 tons of fuel. On the roof lay the whole fuel assemblies. Approximate weight of 300-350 kg each. The rate per person was calculated by removing 50 kg of graphite or 10-15 kg pieces of fuel rod.” / “the total amount of fuel in the lava-like clusters is within 20 % of the entire nuclear fuel that the reactor had at the time of the accident.”

“Checherov analyzed all the reports and minutes of the Integrated expedition with measurements and calculations. The analysis estimated the amount of fuel made on the basis of thermal measurements showed that this estimate was based on assumptions that do not reflect the real picture of the thermal situation in unit 4, and secondly, were based on experiments that are not based on reliable measurements, and voluntarist declarations of expenditure thermal parameters experimentally recorded variations of which varies in the range of up to two orders of magnitude.” / “The maximum thickness of the fuel accumulation , measured on the spot and recorded on the film is 0.5 meters , and if you increase the thickness of the layer 8 times, then this cluster should have a thickness of 4 meters.” / “At the time of the accident in the reactor core were 1,659 fuel channels withg 190,257 kilograms of uranium or its kg Uranium Oxide (UO2).”

“where, how much and in what state the nuclear fuel ?” / “Our reports of fuel found in the Unit 4 was several times smaller, but the debate as to why such differences exist and where the truth is – was not gebated in this symposium” / “regardless of the fact that the reactor vault is empty and you can not see this amount of fuel and the amount of such fuel just could not fit in the observed areas, those who were there and personally saw it with their own eyes the empty space – you can not convince the others that there are not huge amount of fuel as declared by those who have not been there ” / ” it turns out that the minimum found fuel is 53 % of the fuel, and if we accept the second version, you still have to find the 91%!http://www.souzchernobyl.org/?section=31&id=563

 

We are fooled by IAEA and soviet agencies since 1986!

b) What you see here in this video is NOT the fuel melting, because it was thrown completely out by a force of 1,2 terrajule (0,2 – 0,3 KT TNT)  and it is NOT graphite fire, there was none according to a heat photo scanner Checherov used shortly after the explosions. What you see  is the 2,000 tons reactor lid, that was thrown aside and is GLOWING because of HEAT, it was so hot, that it turned from Red (770 – 800°C) into Yellow (1150 – 1250°C). The helicopter crew did not survive. Interivew with above Infos: Constantine Checherov – Senior Researcher of the Kurchatov Institute – one of the first people who visited the reactor hall after the explosion. He does not believe that the explosion of Chernobyl in ’86 exploded was hydrogen. It was a nuclear
explosion scattered hundreds of tons of radioactive fuel around the station: http://www.novayagazeta.ru/society/6095.html

chernobyl-nuke

Info from Interview with Checherov: http://www.novayagazeta.ru/society/6095.html

 

4. So, why a new sarcophagus? Chernobyl as you have read released so much radioactivity as a whole nuclear war. This is where it went down:

belarus-cloud-plane

 

unscear-chernobyl

Chernobyl irradiated the whole European Continent – even pro nuclear UNSCEAR clearly admits that (although their numbers are from the textbook). http://www.unscear.org/docs/JfigXI.pdf

 

To understand the principle of the nuclear explosion of the reactor, and unmask probably the biggest lie in technological history of human history, just have a look at this:

– Chernobyl was a nuclear explosion

No containment can keep such a explosion

– The weight of the reactor lid was 2,000 tons (NOT 1,000!) – important for energy calculation later below

– A containment would increase the yield of the explosion (pressure!)

– This principle is as old as the principle of man made nuclear fission:

From the book “History of the British nuclear industry” by Margaret Gowing, “Britain and Atomic Energy”, on page 382 the former  U.S. water-cooled graphite reactor at Hanford is described: “To be built in view of the risks of an accident, the reactor is at an isolated location. Because water absorbs neutrons, and when the water flow is interrupted and the control rods do not occur immediately in action, the water evaporates in the cooling system and can no longer absorb the neutrons . These neutrons were therefore available to increase the fission rate in the reactor, which is super critical with power. The temperature rises, the fuel evaporated and the radioactivity is spreading widely. “

On page 385 we find the position:
“The gas cooling is to avoid the risk of severe supercritical state …”

mgowing-d

mgowing-c

mgowing-a

mgowing-b

What is supercritical?

The knowledge of the danger of an atomic explosion that can occur in a water-cooled graphite-gas reactor, is as old as the principle of the reactor itself.

Safety Assessment Principle 152 requires ‘The containment should adequately contain such radioactive matter as may be released into it as a result of any fault in the reactor.’ Clearly if nuclear explosions are possible a licence should not be granted. LAST PAGE: http://www.spokesmanbooks.com/Spokesman/PDF/91Gifford.pdf

The number of fissions and the energy released quickly escalate, and if the process is unchecked, the result is a violent explosion. Reactions that multiply in this fashion are called chain reactions.” Quote from: http://wps.prenhall.com/wps/media/objects/3313/3392670/blb2107.html

The critical mass in a reactor (even on a pro nucler site): “After pushing the AZ-5 button the emergency protection system added, according to calculations, about a ß of positive reactivity and created a local critical mass in the lower part of the core – resulting in a sharp increase of power there (see Figure 3) and the coming into play of the positive power coefficient of reactivity. The power in the lower part of the core rose to the level at which the fuel exploded and got dispersed.” quote Anatoly Dyatlov, former deputy engineer for operations at Chernobyl: http://www.neimagazine.com/features/featurehow-it-was-an-operator-s-perspective/

Chernobyl was build by ROSATOM – the ones who build a new reactor in Chernobyl irradiated Belarus, the ones who helped Iran with their nuclear reactors, and probably delievered Polonium 210 to kill Litvenenko in London.

The new sarcophagus is built to contain this dangerous truth. The truth that Chernobyl was emptied by a nuclear explosion (of the reactor type, not bomb type).

Who finances this new project? The “nuclear” bank:

Who supervises it? Former IAEA General Secretary Hans Blix. He said in 1986 in Le Monde: “A yearly Chernobyl is acceptable for the world…”

Chernobyl needs no sarcophagus, not today and not in 1986, because it was and is EMPTY. The establishment of a sarcophagus was crazy, senseless and deadly – But right now, they build the 2nd one. A new Containment for a dangerous truth.

The liquidators have not liquidated Chernobyl. The liquidators have liquidated themselves.

800,000 worked in the area. On site, as doctors, workers… but they worked in the Chernobyl Core – which was scattered everywhere. In microparticles. This means: Soviet officials evacuated 130,000 civilans, but sent 800,000 into the irradiated areas!

Valery Legasov probably knew. BUT:

“Valery A. Legasov” – who was the first russian official who spoke about Chernobyl to the IAEA in 1986, and committed suicide. Before his death he made an audiotape, with untold facts about the Chernobyl explosion. Here are the abstracts of his tapes: “About the accident at Chernobyl” by Academician VA Legasov (text from the 4 cassettes) – in russian: http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/Legasov_V._Ob_Avarii_Na_Chernobiylsk.pdf

His 5 hours long speech at the IAEA 1996 meeting about Chernobyl was ignored: http://books.google.de/books?id=S-SsDtZG5WgC&pg=PA51&dq=new+scientist+valery+legasov&hl=de&ei=Lx_MTuu-BMaEOqb9uKYP&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CDMQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false

He knew about the insanity of sending liquidators to Chernobyl – he could not convince the IAEA and soviet officials. And decades later, Checherov – also from the same institute, indrectly supported the Legasov.

img_4ee5bbb6f2103

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion30

Some say a quake caused the Chernobyl catastrophe. But is the quake maybe the result of the  explosion – expressed as seismic data? Here is the seismis data from 1986, by soviet sources: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr139/pdf/karpan.pdf

seismic011

 

seismic021

seismic041

seismic031

Again the summary, from 1996 IPPNW PSR papers, Vienna:

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion15

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion16

 

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion17

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion18

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion19

by peace researcher NZ:

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion04

This is the NECK SHOT for the nuclear industry. But we failed, because we were blinded by the Meltdown Lie. And we are again blinded by TEPCO and IAEA. They have three empty reactors in Fukushima. They have no evidence where the fuel is. But call it Meltdown.

30 years dear readers. One human generation. One irradiated earth.

Often officials as former soviet Agencies, IAEA, NRC, UNSCEAR, tell the lie of a “hydrogen” or “steam” explosion. That is a lie. It comes from the textbook. Because otherwise reactors would get no licence to be built. They have to keep their inventory inside at all cost. The nuclear textbook is a template and experts push reality through it. The Officials lie about the temperature, or the weight of the reactor lid, or any other data, at least one of them. To downplay the nature of the explosion. But the reactor hall is no more. A fact. Plus the 2,000 tons reactor lid.

50 million Chernobyl curies? IAEA? “The pro-nuclear Time magazine reported in 1989 that perhaps “one billion or more” curies were released, rather than the 50 to 80 million estimated by Russian authorities.” Source: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/Chernobyl/Chernobyl@10p2.html

All radiation maps, doses, emissions are from the text book – not from reality. 50 million curie are: 1,850,000,000,000,000,000 Becquerel (1.85e+18) released by CHERNOBYL. A lie!

There is nearly NOTHING left in the Chernobyl 4 reactor! This is proven! 

Argonne National Laboratory in Illinois: 9 Billion Curie

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California: 4,5 Billion Curie

Source: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb6393/is_n3_v12/ai_n28692892/

1,85 1,85 1,85 1,85 1,85 1,85… Just remember this number ONE point EIGHT FIVE and the 50

let’s look at the Boiling Water Manual from GE, also for Fukushima:

page 73:

ge-ari1

and page 76:

ge-ari2

Each reactor releases 50 micro curie of radioactive gases: which is 1,850,000 becquerel PER SECOND!

There is the 50 and the 1,85 again!

It’s all from the textbook!

It’s not the reality!

Can you control atoms?

>>>> A normal reactor releases 1,850,000 becquerel per second. Multiply it with x 10 = 18,500,000 becquerel – these are also the offical MAXIMUM LEVELS of radionuclide activity in the exclusion Chernobyl zone in Belarus (from the 1995 Belarus NATIONAL Report):

Again the 1,85 !

daily dose at a 1000 Curie per km² area, for example near Chernobyl reactor 4 with 37 mio becquerel per m² (map) is something like 10 mSv PER DAY – while normal is 1 – 2 mSv per year

 

They press reality into their simulation models. Especially Chernobyl. The 50 Mio Curie are used to conceal the fact, that ALL Inventory was thrown out in 1986, thats more than 5 billion curie, not 50 million. But they use the textbook to conceal it, in order to prove that even during an explosion a reactor safe. And now these madmen build a 2nd sarcophagus around and EMPTY reactor, to even underline the 30 years old lie!

More than a million people died because of Chernobyl:

n contrast (by Alexey Jablokov, co-author of the 1000,000 Chernobyl Deaths-Study: http://www.strahlentelex.de/Yablokov%20Chernobyl%20book.pdf ):

The UNSCEAR Committee for the Scientific Investigation of the effects of radiation United Nations has declared:

The UNCEAR committee has decided not to extrapolate the effects of Low-level radiation from the Chernobyl accident on the population on the basis of models extrapolate absolute terms, because these predictions are afflicted with unacceptable unreliability (UNSCEAR, 2011; 98, p.18).

This “unreliability” depends on both the methodological errors of the officially recognized system for the determination of radiation risk (eg: ECRR, 2003, 2010), as well as with the underestimation of the extent of the effects of the atomic bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined (eg: Bertell, 1985, Stewart, 1989)

One of the methodological error of traditional approaches to determining the scope of Radiation risk is the exclusive use of data on cancer mortality, although it is not the most important cause of mortality after the Chernobyl accident, in radioactively contaminated territories. Another methodological error of UNSСEAR approach is a complete disregard of the Increase in perinatal mortality rate after the disaster that after the Chernobyl Accident in the many highly radioactively contaminated areas in Belarus (Petrova et al. 1997, Korblein, 2002, 2006), Ukraine (Dzykovich et al., 2004), Russia (Balewa, et al., 2001), Germany (Schreb, Incited, 2000, Korblein, Kuchenkoff, 1997, Schreb et al., 2000), Poland (Korblein, 2003, 2006) and UK (Bentham, 1999, Busby, 1995) showed. Since the time of the nuclear weapons tests in the atmosphere is known that the radioactive Contamination, an increase of prenatal mortality rate (stillbirths and Miscarriages) and infant mortality rate (Sternglass, 1972; White, 1992;. Playford et al, 1992; Overview here Busby, 1995; Yablokov, 2002, Durakovic, 2003) causes.

My part: Infant Mortality Changes Following the Three Mile Island Accident,” from 1980: http://atomichistory.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/sternglass_infantmortalitytmi.pdf quote “The discrepancy in infant deaths between the two sources for the period of April 1 through June 30, 1979, had been two; from October 1 through December 31 it had also been two. For eighty-eight to surface between July 1 and September 30, precisely in the controversial summer months after the TMI accident, seemed unlikely.”

My part: Quote: “The victims of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and patients treated with X-rays because of such dubious indications as thymus hyperplasia demonstrate the exceptionally high sensitivity of children. However, the important discovery of Stewart and coworkers in 1958 , an enhancement of childhood leukaemia following diagnostic X-ray pictures during pregnancy, listed as historic milestone by Mossman also, has provoked a deep controversy. Their findings were an impressive support of the postulated linear non-threshold relationship for leukaemia” SOURCE Page 2: http://www.staff.uni-marburg.de/~kunih/all-doc/doserele.pdf

In the period 1987-88 is a well-documented increase in infant mortality in the leaves radioactive contaminated areas of Ukraine (Grodzinsky, 1999; Omelianetz, Klementjew, 2001, Dubowaja, 2010), Russia (Fetisow, 1999; Hworostenko, 1999; Komogortseva, 2001, Utka et al. 2005, ZYB et al., 2006) and Germany (Korblein, 2006 notice) was found. After the Chernobyl Accident increased infant mortality affects even the entire demographic Statistics of a number of countries. In the more contaminated areas of Ukraine and Russia an increased Overall mortality observed. (The most recent 1995;. Omelianets et al, 2001; Оmelianets, Klement’ev, 2001, Grodzinsky, 1999;. Golubchikov et al, 2002, Kaschirina, 2005; Sergeeva et al. 2005; Dubowaja, 2010, Kaschirina, 2005; Sergeewa et al, 2005;. Fetisow, 1999; Sukalska et al.
2004 and many others).

The methodological error of the epidemiological approach to determining the number of victims is based on the accounts of the radiation risk is that the estimation of the number of victims on the comparison of relatively well-documented mortality and morbidity rates (the number the sick and the dead carried out), while levels of radioactive Load can not be accurately determined. Moreover, this approach to determine the Number of victims is not capable of the effects of low radiation dose precisely to record (which have added even the inventor of this approach): “The currently available Epidemiological data provide no basis for reasonable assurance to the radioactive contamination attributable morbidity and mortality in test groups from the To predict the population of the three republics and other European countries, with a average dose of less than 30 mSv were charged in the past 20 years. Any rise in [the morbidity and mortality among these groups] would be lower than the Emerging scientific measurability. “(UNSCEAR, 2011, (97), p. 18).

The methodological Defectiveness of the epidemiological approach leads to the large deviation of forecasts the numbers of victims. (Table 1):

CHERNOBYL DEATHS :

4,000 deaths (in 90 years. Belarus, Ukraine, European part Russia) according to IAEA / WHO – press paper Chernobyl forum 2005

8,930 deaths (in 90 years. Belarus, Ukraine, European part Russia) according to Chernobyl forum 2005

7,400 deaths (Whole world for 50 years) according to Anspaugh et al., 1988

30,000 deaths (Whole world for 50 years) according to Goldman, 1987

18,000 (8,000 – 32,000) deaths (Europe, 1986 – 2065 without Thyroid cancer) according to Cardis et al., 2006

30,000 – 60,000 deaths (Whole world. About the entire period) according to Fairley, Sumner,2006

117,000 (37,000 – 181,000) deaths (Whole world. in the period 1986 – 2056) according to Malko, 2010

317,000 – 475,000 (495,000 with Leukemia) deaths (Whole world. About the whole period. only radiocesium) according to Hofman,1994

899,000 – 1,786 000 deaths (Whole world. About the entire period. only radionuclides) according to Bertell,2006

Some estimates of the additional through by the ‘Chernobyl’ caused mortality Cancer, which made the epidemiological approach (“dose” method) were Based on the spread of the “dose” method estimates, which are set out in the table are more than 400 times higher than the usual scientific disagreement. You can with the Opinion of UNSCEAR agree that not a forecast of the number of victims work but with one caveat: This does not work only if the traditional “dose” – Method is applied.

For the estimation of the total number of victims is another method (the so-called “Balance” method) reliable. It consists of the data of the health status of Population of the radioactively contaminated areas with high data. To compare health status of the population from the “clean” areas. The basic source data consist of physical instrumental measurements of radioactive Contamination of an area and the incidence rate and mortality (morbidity and mortality) in this area.

The best example of this method is the Additional calculations on the “Chernobyl” accident declining mortality, Hudolej W. et al. (2006) in the six regions of Russia was performed. In these
Areas that were affected by the fallout from Chernobyl were the worst, 7.5 million People.

I leave the details of the bills and put aside just before the results: Total number of excess deaths in these six radioactively contaminated areas was 60 400. This corresponds to 3.75% of total mortality of the population during the examined 15 years (from 1990 to 2004.) or 37 of every 1,000 people. Conversion to at all levels of ≥ 1 Ci / km ² contaminated areas within the former Soviet Union (and taking into account the mortality of liquidators and evacuees from these areas after 1986) could all of the additional mortality rate in Ukraine, Belarus and in the European part of Russia in the period 1990-2004 by the Chernobyl accident was caused, amounted to around 240 000 cases.

In Europe, outside the areas affected by radioactive releases from the Ukraine, Belarus and the European part of Russia could be the additional “Chernobyl” – Mortality in areas with a level of contamination Cesium137> 1.08 Ci / km ² (> 40 kBq / m) in the period 1990 to 2004 a number of 185 000 cases, represent, and in the areas with a higher population density and a contamination level of

To this figure should be even mortality within the first 3.5 years after the Disaster (May 1986 – 1989) and add the period 2006-2011. If it is suspected that the annual death rate for the first 3.5 years of the 1990-2004 period at about corresponded to (the infant mortality rate is higher, while the mortality of adults lower), adds even further 240 000 cases. If one assumes that the Mortality rate during 2005-2010 was about half (on the one hand, the population older and “collected” diseases are clear and the latent period of several Cancer is over, on the other hand, the level of chronic radiation decreases due to the decay of cesium-137 and strontium-90), there are again additional 170 000 cases.

In this way, the overall level of additional “Chernobyl” in the mortality rate Period of the first 25 years are estimated by the disaster: 1 034 000 + 240 000 + 170 000 = 1.444 million victims. But this figure also shows the entire “Chernobyl” mortality is not complete. It is known that the disaster to a sudden increase in prenatal mortality has done. The increase in the number of still-births and miscarriages can be divided into a number highly radioactively contaminated areas in Ukraine, Belarus and Russia to determine (Kulakov et al, 1993;. Buzhievskaya et al, 1995; Buldakov et al, 1996;. Golovko, Ishewski, 1996; Medvedeva et al, 2001; Lypik, 2004;. Serdjulk et al, 2004; Timchenko et al, 2006;. ZYB et al. 2006) (. Scherb et al, 2000; Scherb, Wiegel, 2010) as well as the phenomenon is in Bavaria, Croatia (Korblein, 2008), UK (Bentham, 1991, Busby 1995), Finland (Auvinen et al, 2001.) Italy (Semisa, 1988) and Norway (Ulstain et al., 1990) measurable. The calculation of the total Number of such cases is not entirely accurate, but might, according to the experts’ assessments about 170 000 cases estimated for whole Europe.

If we agree with the opinion of the nuclear society, in the UNSCEAR (2001) is expressed, and thus give up the tests, the exact number of victims of To predict the Chernobyl disaster, because we seem to inaccurate estimates, then comes the one thought prohibition. The other approach is to consider all arguments and vague estimates to clarify gradually. With regard to the scale of the disaster, the whole territory of
northern hemisphere and thus affected more than one billion people and has concerns, it clear that it is impossible to exactly the number of victims up to thousands or tens of thousands of people determine. But it seems important to determine the magnitude of the numbers: Some thousands (Which is unnoticeable in the overall mortality rate) or a few million (which is a Forcing a rethink in terms of nuclear technology would).

The “balance” – method for determining the number of victims of the Chernobyl accident, which during the last years has developed rapidly and is still evolving, it looks advantageous- Especially in comparison with that used with the calculation of the radiation risk “Dose” method, which is based on unreliable estimates of radiation dose. The “Balance” – method is not ideal because it is the formation of average values of
demographic characteristics and an assessment of the radiation rate in the observed Areas needed. The undoubted advantage of the “Balance” method when compared with the “dose” Method, however, is that it makes no less verifiable assumptions. In the analysis of the mortality situation in the Chernobyl radionuclides on by one level of ≥ 1 Ci / km ² (40 kBq / m) contaminated areas in Russia, Belarus and Ukraine has been found that the overall mortality rate here is around 4% higher than in the relatively “clean” neighboring areas. In the other, huge sections of the northern Hemisphere, which were affected by the Chernobyl fallout is weaker, the number of additional Low mortality, no doubt, but given the large amount of people affected they certainly still essential. The rough estimation of the total possible number of Chernobyl victims in the period of the last 25 years is about 1.44 million cases (under Consideration of prenatal deaths – 1.6 million cases). This confirms the known Statement: The Chernobyl accident is the biggest technological catastrophe in Human history.

5. The DAMAGE TO HUMANS by CHERNOBYL:

Dr. Rosalie Bertell, “People died at Three Mile Island / Killing Our Own”: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/KillingOurOwn/KOO14.htm

written by Dr. Bertell also: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/Chernobyl/CaUFtH.html

and: http://exacteditions.theecologist.org/read/ecologist/vol-29-no-7-november-1999-5368/29/2/

Chernobyl: The Accident and it’s implications for other Nuclear Reactors

Speakers are:

> Dr. Sergij Mirnyi, Engineer, Physico-Chemist, Liquidator (http://www.mirnyi.arwis.com/)

> Prof. Vesily Nesterenko, Physicist, founder BELRAD institute, liquidator (http://www.belrad-institute.org/)

> Commander Robert Green, former Royal navy (http://hildamurrell.org/)

> Prof. Yuli Andreev, Physicist, liquidator (http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/15/us-japan-nuclear-chernobyl-idUSTRE72E5MV20110315)

> Dr. Wolfgang Kromp, Physicist, Nuclear advisor to Austrian Federal Chancellor (http://www10.antenna.nl/wise/index.html?http://www10.antenna.nl/wise/459/4556.html)

CLICK TO ENLARGE:

Chernobyl and the Human Rights of the Victims (ALARA, ICRP, IAEA):

Reactors – build by nuclear military-industrial complex
Dose Limits – invented by nuclear military-industrial complex
Compensation rules – designed by nuclear military-industrial complex

belarus-cloud-plane

Speakers are:

Dr. Irina Grushevaya, Foundation for The Children of Chernobyl, Minsk (https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/11/11/belarusian-fund-for-the-children-of-chernobyl-gets-european-award/)

Dr. Yuri Pankratz, Foundation for The Children of Chernobyl, Minsk (http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/17737-1)

Prof. Galina Drozdova, Russian People’s Friendship University, Moscow (http://www.friends-partners.org/oldfriends/welling/drozdova.html)

Prof. Larisa Skuratovskaya, Institute of General Pathology and Pathopsychology, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow (http://www.imow.org/community/directory/user/index?id=18306)

Prof. Peter Welsh, Member of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna (http://chernobyl.iatp.by/n1/Koerb_en.htm)

Prof. Hari Sharma, Nuclear Chemistry, University of Waterloo, Canada, International Medical Commission on Chernobyl (http://iicph.org/du_update_1_3)

CLICK TO ENLARGE:

Chernobyl: Evidence of Genetic or Teratogenic Damage to Environment and Humans:

Speakers are:

Ms. Cornelia Hesse-Hornegger, scientific illustrator specialising in Zoology (http://www.wissenskunst.ch/uk/aktuelles/contemporary/)

Ms. Solange Fernex, former Member of the European Parliament (http://www.nuclear-free.com/english/fernex.htm)

Dr. Sanghamitra Gadekar, International Medical Commission on Chernobyl (http://www.ptne.org/depositions/Surendra%20Gadekar.pdf)

CLICK TO ENLARGE:

Chernobyl “compressed several thousand years of evolution into a decade” – New York Times 1996 http://www.nytimes.com/1996/05/07/science/chernobyl-s-voles-live-but-mutations-surge.html

Fukushima’s Butterflies – known since 1927: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/08/17/fukushimas-butterflies-known-since-1927/

Insects and their fast mutagenic “reaction” on low radiation are some kind of early warning system for us humans: Irradiated Insects in Japan: http://www.freeml.com/bl/8694840/25149/

normal insects soon only in the laboratory: http://www.wissenskunst.ch/en/tschernobyl.htm

Great book about mutagentic impact on insects worldwide: http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/3908247314/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=thtefi-21&linkCode=as2&camp=1634&creative=6738&creativeASIN=3908247314

Reduced abundance of insects and spiders linked to radiation at Chernobyl: http://cricket.biol.sc.edu/chernobyl/papers/moller-mousseau-biol-letters-09.pdf please have a look at this beautiful book

in english: http://radionucleide.free.fr/Stresseurs/fulltext_punaise.pdf

and in german: http://www.sensigns.ch/db/daten/dokumente/Heteroptera_Deutsch.pdf

MOVIE: Chernobyl Children: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lvNR8VtVJpU

MOVIE: Adi Roche, Chernobyl Children: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YUA4Bvfu9w

Chernobyl Data: Dr. A.Okeanov: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/09/25/chernobyl-data-dr-a-okeanov-ministery-of-health-belarus-morbidity-rate-among-children-and-teens/

Chernobyl: Development failures in the NEWBORN: http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/Lazyuk-ChernobylBelarus.pdf  According to Michel Fernex (former WHO, Switzerland) The IAEA said in 1996: “Because there was no register in Belarus for malformations BEFORE Chernobyl, there are no abnormalities.” A LIE, not logic, unethic and unsicentific.

Results of Long-term Genetic Monitoring of Animal Populations Chronically
Irradiated in the Radiocontaminated Areas http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Goncharova.pdf

Health State of Belarusian Children Suffering from the Chernobyl Accident: Sixteen Years after the Catastrophe: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr79/kr79pdf/Arynchyn.pdf

Incidence of Obligatory Registered Malformations in Belarus for 1982 to 1995 (per 1000 neonates) PAGE 3: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Lazjuk.pdf

UN-cancer

The UN is divided into 7 organisations, of which two are of interest to us, the Economic and Social Council and the Security Council.The “Economic and Social Council” oversees ALL the United Nations agencies with the exception of the “IAEA”.

In fact, the IAEA is the only agency that reports directly to the “Security Council” which is made up of representatives of 15 countries, of which 5 are permanent members of the Council : the United States, the Untied Kingdom, the Russian Federation, China and France.

These 5 nations are all nuclear powers, both civil and military, and almost all are exporters of nuclear technology.
The 10 remaining members (or countries) have a mandate which lasts for 2 years.

The influence of these 5 permanent members of the Security Council on policy making within the IAEA is enormous and ongoing. With no counterbalancing power, it is almost impossible to claim that the IAEA has an objective view of the nuclear industry and the consequences of its use.

On 28th May 1959, the IAEA (not yet two years old !) and WHO signed an agreement referred to as “WHA 12-40” which, though it might, on paper, appear balanced and reciprocal, in practice, puts WHO in a subordinate position to the IAEA.

From this day on all information policy by the media, the ministeries, the universites and commissions is directly affected by that. We’ve seen it happening with Chernobyl and in Japan.

“…the IAEA will endeavour to organize conferences, seminars and workshops, in cooperation with the University, with the aim of enhancing public awareness of radiological effects on human health and addressing the issue of “radiation fear” and post-traumatic stress disorders in the Fukushima population…”

http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/energy/fukushima_2012/pdfs/fukushima_iaea_en_06.pdf

Direct Damage To People attributable to Chernobyl

Speakers are:

Prof. Elena Burlakova, Semenov Institute of Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow (http://archive.nbuv.gov.ua/portal/chem_biol/chemistry/2010_2/14.pdf)

Prof. Yvetta Kogarko, Semenov Institute of Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow (http://books.google.de/books?id=9aVUTgKDNYEC&pg=PA323&lpg=PA323)

Prof. Irina Pelevina, Semenov Institute of Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow

Prof. Ludmilla Kryzhanovskaya, Chief of the Department, Kiev Institute of Social and Forensic Psychiatry (http://medical-diss.com/medicina/mediko-sotsialnye-osnovy-zabolevaemosti-invalidnosti-i-sovershenstvovanie-sistemy-sotsialnoy-zaschity-invalidov-vsledstvi)

Prof. Leonid Titov, Director of the Belarusian Research Institute for Epidemiology, Immunology and Microbiology, Minsk (http://nasb.gov.by/eng/members/correspondents/titov.php)

Prof. Nika Gres, Research Institute of Radiation Medicine, Minsk (http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr79/kr79pdf/Arynchyn.pdf)

Prof. Jay Gould, President of the Radiation and Public Health Project, New York (USA) (http://www.radiation.org/reading/ and http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/19/nyregion/19gould.html?_r=0)

Prof. Inge Schmitz-Feuerhake, Institute for Medical Physics, University of Bremen, Germany (http://www.chernobylcongress.org/speakers/artikel/228ec3fb555cefc5a28d030951e8f385/prof-dr-rer-nat-inge-schmitz-feu-1.html)

Dr. Andreas Nidecker, Medical Radiologist, Past-President of IPPNW Switzerland, International Medical Commission on Chernobyl, Basel (https://www.facebook.com/andreas.nidecker)

Prof. Sushima Acquilla, Epidemiological Department, University of Newscastle-on-Tyne, UK (http://www.fph.org.uk/working_abroad)

Click to Enlarge:

 

The BIMODAL effect of low radiation on health – proven by Burlakova 1996, ignored by science and IAEA, today’s science ONLY looks for LINEAR dose effects. They use the model of HIGH radiation (acute syndrome) on LOW radiation effects (cancer, diseases, mutation – …) – result: ALL radiation victims are and latency in general ignored! Please share: http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/BurlakovaChernobyl-Belarus.pdf

The IAEA is unscientific and unethic. They ignore the bimodal effect of low radiation.

“Presently the international organizations (WHO, IAEA) recognize as the main cause of increase of thyroid cancer in liquidators and children population after the accident their irradiation with radioactive iodine, I-131. The rest of diseases, they suppose, are provoked by psycho-emotional reactions..” (!!!…RADIOPHOBIA…!!!) There is no linear dose effect correlation, but “The bimodal dependence of effects on dose was revealed for all studied parameters. Namely, effects increased at low doses, reached maximum (for low doses), then decreased (in some cases the effect sign reversed) and thereafter increased with the increase of dosage”: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Burlakova.pdf IGNORED BY IAEA, UNSCEAR, ICRP, WHO

NUCLEAR WITNESSES, INSIDERS SPEAK OUT: DR. ERNEST J. STERNGLASS, PHYSICIST  http://www.ratical.org/radiation/inetSeries/nwEJS.html

 

Prof. Gould explains How Radiation Kills Infants

Click to Enlarge:

In the late 70s, there were in Wisconsin / USA seven nuclear power plants without incident. The mortality of infants of lower weight (less than 2500 grams) was examined: If the officially published emission rates of the nuclear power plants increased from year to year (Source: Government of the United States), also the mortality of underweight babies was increased. http://books.google.de/books?id=Rdgo5cXrO94C&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q=Small%20babies%20die%20near%20nuclear%20plants&f=false

“According to the ICRP in 1991, just 5 mSv to the testes could cause damage to offspring – yet this dose was permitted yearly to members of the public, and ten times more was permitted to nuclear workers, in all countries prior to 1990. It continues today to be permitted yearly for nuclear workers in most countries.” http://iicph.org/victims_of_the_nuclear_age

“Possible scale of lost or impaired children after Chernobyl in all of Europe and the part of Asia coveredMissing Children: 2,5 Million.” PAGE 34 http://www.ratical.org/radiation/Chernobyl/RIGEinEuroandCNPPc.pdf

“Children receive the highest doses, because the dose coefficients, in a 3 year old child, are 5 times higher than in adults.“ Vassily Nesterenko: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/children-radiation-maps-2/

“the human infant while nursing may attain higher body bur dens of radiocesium than would be the case for somewhat older children.”: http://radionucleide.free.fr/Stresseurs/419.pdf

“By mid 1998 first draft of the Guidelines was circulating between IAEA and WHO at the management level.

“Although there had been a clear agreement between the two organisations at
the management level and the work had taken place openly the IAEA withdrew
at that stage strongly advising that the whole issue should either be dropped or
revised. The issue was the proposal to lower the action level for implementation
from 100mGy to 10mGy dose to the thyroid’s of children.”

“Managerial level of IAEA refuses to endorse the report and refuses to endorse the report but WHO publishes Guidelines in 1999 but IAEA describes them as “DRAFT” and WHO Geneva agrees”

SOURCE: http://www.chernobylcongress.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/Baverstock_How_the_UN_works.pdf

Congenital Malformation and Stillbirth in Germany and Europe Before and

After the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant Accident: http://www.helmholtz-muenchen.de/ibb/homepage/hagen.scherb/CongenMalfStillb_0.pdf

European stillbirth proportions before

“After Chernobyl, infant mortality rates in Sweden, Finland and Norway increased by a significant 15.8 percent compared to the trend for the period 1976 to 2006. Alfred Körblein calculated that for the period 1987 to 1992 an additional 1,209 (95% confidence interval: 875 to 1,556) infants had died.”

“From the period of atmospheric nuclear weapons testing it is known that the infant mortality parameter is sensitive to radioactivity. It therefore comes as no surprise that there are now numerous studies showing that infant mortality is not only higher in the vicinity of Chernobyl, but also further away – in Europe. In the textbooks there is nothing to be found on this yet, but it is to be found in a number of different journals.”

“n 1986 in Berlin, an unusual increase of infant mortality was observed. Compared to 1985, infant mortality in Berlin rose in 1986 from 10.6 to12.5 per 1,000 live births in the first year of life. The mortality rate of non-German infants increased over-proportionally from 9.6 auf 14.3 per thousand. The mortality rate even increased between the end of the first week and the end of the first year of life by 26 percent. There had previously been a decrease in infant mortality”

“Ever since discovering the mutagenicity of ionising radiation in animal experiments, damaging radiation genetic effects in humans have also been repeatedly considered and examined. The ICRP, however, is of the opinion that teratogenic damage (stillbirths, infant mortality, severe malformation) does not occur below a dose of 100 mSV. Since the mean dose for Germany in 1986-7 was only 0.2 mSV, according to ICRP opinion there can’t have been an increase in teratogenic damage. On the other hand, there are numerous studies from Germany, Europe and the three countries in the Chernobyl region that show that there was indeed an increase in teratogenic damage, contrary to expectations on the part of these scientists.”

Source: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/Chernobyl/HEofC25yrsAC.html

“Energy mix and a weapon strategy inseparably involve human consequences in terms of increased incidence of leukaemia, other cancers, neonatal and infant mortality, mental retardation, congenital malformations, genetic diseases and general health problems.” Source: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/inetSeries/RB89.html

Alfred Koerblein: Fukushima & Chernobyl: http://www.alfred-koerblein.de/indexengl.htm

SOURCE: http://www.chernobylcongress.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/nyagu.pdf

Stochastic effects and children:
There is statistical health damage caused by the so-called low-level radiation (above ZERO up to 500mSv.) That is not assigned to any particular people, but occur in a defined population. This issue is the subject of thousands of studies all over the world since the Chernobyl nuclear disaster, and I will discuss in detail below with reference to examples. Factors such as age, gender, health, immune system, nutrition, social situation and the duration of exposure of the radioactivity influence the onset of cancer and other diseases. Until the Chernobyl disaster, the biological effects in the body of the
radioactive isotopes have been undervalued.

It is now clear: Any radiation poses a risk especially for children who are extremely radiosensitive.

1) A child is constantly increasing in weight and size, it grows from the intrauterine embryo to adult, the younger, the faster. Therefore, the cells divide much more frequently than an adult. Cells in the division phase (mitosis) are more vulnerable to radiation than cells in the resting phase.

2) The ability of the body to recognize “defective” cells and to  eliminate them develops during childhood. An embryo has not yet this ability. Therefore  “defective” cells can multiply unimpeded and later lead to cancer or heritable diseases.

3) A child that grows must hold more substances than emiting them, more than an adult. The body of a child takes in more radioactive substances in food, drink and air we breathe than adults. Especially dangerous are 137 and Cs-134 and 137 and Sr-90 – deposited in the muscles or in the bone (see below).

4) Children have their whole lives ahead of them. Some diseases caused by radiation take a long time to occur (latency): 20 or even 30 years. Children are more likely than older adults to reach the dubious chance to see the end of this latency. In the human body there are about 200 different cell types, each has a different function.

Basically, each cell can respond to injury with four responses:

1) The damage is so severe that the cell dies.

2) The cell can repair the damage (in children see above).

3) The cell loses its ability to produce certain substances, such as in the pancreas gland which can not produce insulin anymore (increase of diabetes in Belarus among children and adults) or other digestive juices during the growth, of the thyroid hormones.

4) The malignant cells degenerate and there is cancer.

It is now clear: Any radiation poses a risk especially for children who are extremely radiosensitive.

The effect of 4 isotopes of iodine -131, Strontium-90, Tritium (H-3) and cesium – 134 / 137 on the human body I will now show more detail, not without pointing out the most toxic isotope, plutonium (Pu-239), that triggers in micrograms cancer. It is produced in each reactor in the fission of uranium, about 250kg per year and reactor. 

“In some areas where congenital diabetes had not been seen at all before the catastrophe, there were occurrences afterward and the number of cases has increased since 1986 (Marples, 1996).” PAGE 99: http://stopnuclearpoweruk.net/sites/default/files/Yablokov%20Chernobyl%20book.pdf

“Children are more endangered than adults, because their cells divide themselves constantly. Because they grow, they need permanent energy and have to deal with the impairment of their cells. With children, ailments will start earlier, one to four years afterwards, such as in the case of Chernobyl. Adults have a latency period for Cesium of 20-25 years. It is a slow death, adults who survived 25 years become ill now. The children got sick much earlier and often died.” http://fukushima-diary.com/2011/11/slow-death/ 

translation of “slow death” by Hohlie Hohltaube: http://vogelgarten.blogspot.com/2011/10/das-leise-sterben.html

Endocrinologists from the Heinrich-Heine-University in Düsseldorf and the Belarussian endocrine advice centre in Minsk cooperated on an investigation into the development of diabetes amongst children and young adults in Belarus. Over a lengthy period, 1980 to 2002, the incidence rate (new illness accumulation per annum) of diabetes mellitus Type1 – diabetes with insulin deficiency, mainly amongst young adults – was observed in two areas of Belarus that had been contaminated to very different degrees. Data from the highly contaminated Gomel area was compared with that of the comparatively slightly contaminated area of Minsk, during the periods 1980-1986 and 1987-2002. A total of 643 patients from the Gomel area and 302 patients from the Minsk area were involved in the analysis. In the years 1980-1986 (before Chernobyl) there was no significant difference between the incidence rates in Gomel and Minsk. In contrast to this, for the years following Chernobyl (1987-2002), there was evidence of a significant difference (p<0.001) in the incidence rates of both areas. The authors also discovered that the incidence rate in the Minsk area before and after Chernobyl was not significantly different, but it was in the highly contaminated Gomel area (p<0.05), where annually about twice as many children and young adults developed diabetes mellitus Type 1 after Chernobyl, as compared to the years before Chernobyl. The highest mean incidence rate was registered in the Gomel area in 1998″ http://www.ratical.org/radiation/Chernobyl/HEofC25yrsAC.html

Radiation is not life-friendly. It is a hostile factor. Life has prevailed against this hostile factor. The natural radiation. The beta radiation of strontium has a range of 1 millimeter. No matter where it is installed, it reaches the stem cells with its beta radiation. From the stem cells, everything is made. So the stem cells are bombarded constantly. What are the symptoms? We received the following reports by the children of Chernobyl: Chernobyl AIDS. Symptoms of anemia with decreased number of red blood cells. A therapy resitant anemia.

Vitamins and iron will not help. The ongoing hemorrhage, the bleeding e.g. from the nose. Decreased number of platelets, which are indeed involved in blood clotting. The immune system of children. They are always sick, every little infection “throws them around”. They constantly have colds, infections. And low white blood cells in the blood. This is easily explained: With a Bone marrow suppression: The bone marrow – due to the constant bombardment – and especially because of the accumulation of strontium – lost the ability to compensate.

Radioactivity means selective delivery of energy. On the molecules in our body. They are tiny pinholes in the shortest possible time. But with full force. We are constantly exposed to such radiation damage each second. Every second. Permanenent.And life could not exist and the information of Life could not be passed on, if we have not developed effective repair mechanisms. But the repair mechanisms are very complex and it takes time. The shorter the life cycle of a cell, the less time remains for the repair. This explains why children with rapidly growing tissue, with rapidly dividing cells – are particularly sensitive to radiation. Mitosis.

 

Here I present with the permission of vice director Mr. Babenko of BELRAD, the Children radiation maps of Belarus (below). First, some background on the data: We see here 17 regions of Belarus:

Irradiated areas and relatively “CLEAN” areas. Children have Cesium in their bodies, no matter if they live in “clean” or irradiated areas. This is one important fact these maps show. Why is that? The average irradiated soil in Belarus is: 1 – 40 Curie per square kilometer (= 37,000 – 1,480,000 becquerel per m²) of radionuclides, such as Cesium 137, Strontium 90, Americium 241 and other radionuclides. It reaches also 160 Curie per km², although it is 40 on official maps, but reaches 18,500,000 becquerel per m² in some places. Here is more info: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/03/04/japanese-children-cancer-outlook-children-need-absolutely-clean-food/ Here is a list of the radionuclides: http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/Primary%20Radionuclides.gif

A brief introduction:

The Chernobyl Radiation Monitoring System in Belarus today: direct PDF link http://www.ec-sage.net/members/paper2%20V.Nesterenko.ppt (on a pro nuclear website)

BELRAD ベラルーシ 市民の放射線計測協会 – May 12th 2012

The circles on the region graphic mostly show GREEN and YELLOW. Green means: Children have 0 – 20 Becquerel of Cesium 137 per body kilogram (2,20 pounds or 35,20 ounzes). Yellow means: Children have 20 – 100 Becquerel of Cesium 137 per body kilogram.
Whole Body Counters: They give you an average of the WHOLE burden in your body of radioactive atoms (Cesium 137 for example) in Speed (Becquerel) per body Kilogram (bq/kg). BUT: It is a WHOLE and NOT a PARTIAL BODY or PARTIAL ORGAN SCANNER. There is a tiny flash each time energy is given out by the radioactive atoms in your children (in the crystals of the device). It appears below a chair in which your child sits. This flash is “translated” into / via a program / computer into Becquerel per Kg. The device is shielded with lead against background radiation. And it is NOT invasive, not dangerous for you and your child. This means: a) If you have 20 Bq / Kg Cesium 137, you can have 10 or 100 times more Cesium 137 in your heart and / or cardio vascular system, because Cesium mimics potassium. And b) a child takes in even 3 to 5 times more substances, among them of course radioactive atoms. The fast metabolism does not help, and the mitosis even accelerates the damage.

Lessons from Belarus to Japan: 555 kBq per m² (15 Curie per km²) to 1,480 kBq per m² (40 Curie per km²) cause 50 – 60 milli Sievert per year for the people living there – according to Belaraus National Report 1995 [the year when Belarus stopped aid for irradiated areas with 1 – 5 Curie km² (37 kBq per m² – 185 kBq per m²)]. Exclusion Zones start at 18,500 kBq (18,500,000!!!) per m² of Cs-137, 455 kBq per m² of Sr-90 and 150 kBq per m² of Pu-239. Very very high tolerance levels, if we take into account, that Bandashevsy proved, that 20 Bq – 50 Bq of Cs-137 per Kg of the body (not kilo Bq! normal Bq!) are already letal for children! 1995: the level of air contamination exceeded by 10 and more times the pre-accident data even for “clean” places, like Minsk.

The river sediments of Dneeper, Sozh and Pripjat, Neman, Zapadnay and Divina increased Cs-137 by 80%. This is only official state data. It reached also backwaters: The Sr-90 activity varies from 2,2 – 66,0 up to 407 – 4,215 Bq/Kg). Alpha-radionuclides density in riverbed sediments is higher than in river waters: Pu238 from 0,005 – 9,10 Bg/Kg; Pu-239-240 from 0,13 – 28,13 Bq/Kg; Am-241 from 0,07 – 16,2 Bq/Kg. In the 90ies the levels fro Cs-137 and Sr-90 exceed pre-accidental levels in ground water 20 – 30 times and in underground waters 10 times and more. Chernobyl turned the soil into a collector where accumulation and prolonged retention of long-living radionculides occur.

Today contaminated soil functions as the main source, which delivers various components of radionuclides into the biosphere. At at distance of 150 – 200 km to Chernobyl: Gomel in Belarus: 2,271 kBq/m² (61 Curie per km²) and Mogilev (146 Curie per km²) can be found. In Bragin (Gomel) Cs-137 contamination is 174 kBq per m² up to 2,523 kBq per m². Radionuclides are distributed into forest photosynthesis: this is the growth line for Cs-137: wood < branches < needles < forest litter. For the living soil cover the line is as follows: herbaceous plants < lichens < mosses. The maximum is in the root system and ground vegetative part of plants, and considerably lower in generating organs. Accumulation degree for Sr-90 in meadow plants is twice as large as compared to Cs-137. The permissible levels for mushrooms is 7,4 kBq per m² for mushrooms. Terretories are called clean if contamination density is lower than 37 kBq per m². For berries of the red worthle berries family varies from 37 to 185 kBq per m². Migration processes of marketable animals and birds cause high specific activity of game registered even on relatively clean terretories. The presence of radioactive isotopes in practically all components of the natural and natural-techno-genic ecosystems with density much higher than before explains their involvement in the geo-chemical and biological cycles of migration. This stuation causes different ways of external and internal irradiation of the population and jeopardizes people’s health. We don’t get more data today, it is covered up by the state. So we go back into the 90ies: Thyroid illnesses morbidity of the children of Gomel area in 1994 (indices per 100,000 children: Total in Belarus 1086,20 – Total in Gomel area: 3594,30 – Contaminated area (> 555 kBq per m² / > 15 Curie per km²): 16159,70. Thyroid cancer morbidity of the children of Gomel area in 1994 (i.p. 100,000 children): Total in Belarus: 3,20 – Total in Gomel area: 12,00 – Contaminated area (> 555 kBq per m² / > 15 Curie per km²): 77,50. Tumour morbidity of the children in Gomel area in 1994 (i.p. 100,000 chidren): Total in Belarus: 101,10 – Total in Gomel area: 154,90 – Contaminated area (> 555 kBq per m² / > 15 Curie per km²): 245,40. Malignant tumour morbidity of the Children of Gomel area in 1994: Total in Belarus: 13,80 – Total in Gomel area: 27,10 – Contaminated area (> 555 kBq per m² / > 15 Curie per km²): 103,30.

Impact on human health in Belarus: http://tschernobyl-initiative.welcomes-you.com/dokumente/belarus/pdf/band3_s8_23.pdf

Official radiation maps of Belarus (too low): http://www.rbic.by/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=256&Itemid=86

How Belarus makes Chernobyl zones attractive, which are irradiated with 40 Curie per km² (1,480,000 Becquerel per m² – gives 50 – 60 mSv/year only by living there): http://www.kostukovichi.mogilev-region.by/en/news/region

 

 

 

“Schoolchildren in contaminated areas received radiologically clean food free of charge in school canteens and spent a month in a sanatorium, in a clean environment, each year. For reasons of economy the annual sanatorium stay has been shortened, and communities in some contaminated areas have been classified as “clean”, thus ending the supply of clean food from the state. ” PDF: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/radioactivity/ChronicCs137iico.pdf Radio-Cesium helps dying. Masked by “ordinary” causes of death.

Cesium 137 and Children
Cardiac insufficiency in 18% of children with less than 5 becquerel per kg
65% in children with 11 to 26 becquerels per kg
87% in children with 74 becquerels per kg
http://www.smw.ch/docs/pdf200x/2004/49/smw-10219.pdf

MORE of the CHILDREN RADIATION MAPS: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/children-radiation-maps-2/

Chernobyl no longer allowed in Belarus: http://spring96.org/en/news/76869

1,000 villages suddenly clean – no longer irradiated – by official decree: http://www.nbcnews.com/id/6492342/ns/us_news-environment/t/chernobyl-neighbors-ignoring-long-term-risk#.VTfJzOHy0uc

 

 

chernobyl-clock

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

rosatom

ROSATOM – the Builder of Chernobyl: http://www.bellona.org/articles/articles_2012/rip_kursk_reactor

plane crash which “killed” ROSATOM experts: http://web.archive.org/web/20110626072754/http://arabnews.com/middleeast/article460576.ece

ROSATOM denies involvment in Litvinenko assasination: http://rt.com/politics/rosatom-russia-polonium-litvinenko/

Arafat and Polonium 210: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/nov/06/yasser-arafat-poisoned-polonium-tests-scientists

ROSATOM builds the two atomic reactors in IRAN: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/16/world/middleeast/16stuxnet.html

ROSATOM – The Builder of Chernobyl RBMK builds the VVER reactor in Ostrovets, Belarus. Here is an overview: “radionuclides content in the soil samples taken at the Ostrovets site is within the following limits:

– Cesium-137 – 1,0 – 2,5 kBq/m2 (0,027 – 0,067 CU/km2)

– Strontium-90 – 0,17 – 0,37 kBq/m2 (0,005 – 0,01 CU/km2)

– Plutonium-238,239,240 – 0,026 – 0,074 kBq/m2 (0,0007 – 0,002 CU/km2)” http://www.wien.gv.at/umweltschutz/bekanntmachungen/pdf/belarus-kurzueberblick.pdf

following radionuclides in the
underground waters is possible:
tritium Cwa.rel (max) = 220 – 510 in 4 – 6 years;
strontium-90 Cwa.rel (max) = 760 – 7600 in 90 – 150 years;
Iodine-129 Cwa.rel (max) = 3,7 – 4.4 in 20 years;
technetium-99 Cwa.rel (max) = 2,9 – 4,5 in 6 – 10 years. http://www.wien.gv.at/umweltschutz/bekanntmachungen/pdf/belarus-ueberblick.pdf

ROSATOM (atomic reactor builder of Iran and Belarus) lost 5 nuclear scientists during plane crash: http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_theenvoy/20110623/ts_yblog_theenvoy/russian-nuclear-scientists-involved-with-iran-nuclear-facility-killed-in-plane-crash

2013:

Is ROSATOM preparing Polonium 210 for Chodorowsky? He is now on Berlin: http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/freigelassener-kreml-gegner-chodorkowski-ist-in-berlin-gelandet-a-940375.html

Political secret deals:
Putin pardoned Chodorkovsky from prison.
In return the European Union promises not to constitute an offer to Ukraine to join the E.U. = Prerequisite for hostile takeover by Russia aka sudden European supprt drop for Ukrainian Civil Society and democracy movement. This is active euthanasia. The Ukraine becomes a perfect breeding ground: Shortage of money and energy shortages, as well as dependence on Russia. Once ROSATOM buld Chernobyl in 1970, then detonated in 1986, after becoming critical in 1984. Belarus became irradiated 100%. In 2011, the same company ROSATOM builds a VVER Reactor in Belarus. The same is now planned for Ukraine. First comes of course the “friendly” credit, of course. Political hostage takers do not want ransom money, it is part of the hostage-taking!

2014:

PutinROSATOM‘s spokesman – gives Ukraine a credit: http://uk.reuters.com/article/2013/12/18/uk-ukraine-idUKBRE9BG09Q20131218

and to Hungary: http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/01/13/us-hungary-russia-nuclear-idUSBREA0C0PM20140113

To destroy the democracy and make them energy hostages:

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

Dear readers, please share this. There is much need for it, since even anti atomic people don’t know this.

First of all I want to thank Mochizuki Cheshire Iori http://fukushima-diary.com/ and http://ex-skf.blogspot.com/ for their reports.

Up to 1,300,000,000 people have died because of the nuclear fission: http://exacteditions.theecologist.org/exact/browsePages.do?issue=5368&size=3&pageLabel=408

“This estimate does not include the dose from radioactive carbon (carbon 14) which, because of its 5730-year half-life, persists in the human food chain and has not yet taken its total human toll.” http://www.ratical.org/radiation/NRBE/NRBE12.html#Rfn35

“We are constantly being told about a ‘permissible amount of radiation.’ Who permitted it? Who has any right to permit it?” Albert Schweitzer

http://icanw.org/1957

“The most important consideration is the generally accepted value judgment that early embryonic losses are of little personal or social concern.” Dr R. Mole, 1979, a member of ICRP – The international committee which makes the dose limits WORLDWIDE ignores LIFE. http://bjr.birjournals.org/content/52/614/89

Dwight Eisenhower advised AEC (NRC): “Keep the Public confused about Fission and Fusion.” http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1755&dat=19790423&id=nXUjAAAAIBAJ&sjid=lmcEAAAAIBAJ&pg=6981,3863905

INDEPENDENT RADIATION MEASUREMENTS JAPAN Citizen’s Radioactivity Measuring Station http://en.crms-jpn.com/index.html adress: 〒960-8036 / Fukushima-shishinmachi 8-8 / Meiho Bill 3F MAIL: info@crms-jpn.com /

You all know the recent development:

Japanese officials deny radiation free life: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVuGwc9dlhQ Scandal Taints Japan Nuclear Sector http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904823804576499942442007306.html?mod=rss_asia_whats_news The Japanese Government wants the people to return to Fukushima! Like it happened in Chernobyl areas in Belarus: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/​2011/07/24/japan-goes-the-same​-way-as-belarus-dictatorship-a​-deep-insight/ Proof: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v​=8xL3MiDEtrA At Minute 11:21.

N.R.C. Study Downgrades Death Risks in Nuclear Meltdowns http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/30/science/earth/30radiation.html?_r=3 And this is N.R.C.’s other “business”: General license for use of DEPLETED URANIUM: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/part040/part040-0025.html

Japan Held Nuclear Data, Leaving Evacuees in Peril http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/09/world/asia/09japan.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all%3Fsrc%3Dtp Japan opens evacuating area: http://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20110809/t10014788651000.html The only help from Japanese government for radiation victims: Censorship http://japanfocus.org/-Makiko-Segawa/3516 This all happened also in Chernobyl affected Countries, mostly in Belarus. This is the 25 years outlook for Japan: http://www.strahlentelex.d​e/Yablokov%20Chernobyl%20b​ook.pdf

What’s behind all this? What is low radiation everyone hears about these days? It’s a long, but interesting read:

The international radiation protection bodies such as ICRP, UNSCEAR and BEIR base their findings on the somatic damage (cancer, leukemia risks) mainly on studies of the victims of the nuclear tests of Nagasaki and Hiroshima, wo still lived in 1950. That’s right, not 1945, 1950! This study is called “T65D.” It was begun in 1950. The five years before that has not been studied. It was observed since 1950. About 800,000 Japanese people harmed by radiation, and the analysation of their causes of death. http://www.rerf.or.jp/glos​sary_e/t65d.htm and:  http://www.rerf.or.jp/library/archives_e/lsstitle.html /  For validation of this study the US even did an atomic test in Nevada: http://www.sciencemag.org/​content/212/4497/900.extra​ct

More: “Since 1950, more than 90,000 of the survivors of the atomic bombings at Hiroshima and Nagasaki have been enrolled in a lifetime study of their health”: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/RIC/chp4F.html / Alteration of the study: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/RIC/chp5F.html

Quote “Radiation protection norms are a HOAX: “Since 1950, more than 90,000 of the survivors of the atomic bombings at Hiroshima and Nagasaki have been enrolled in a lifetime study of their health. The study, first conducted by the Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission (ABCC), was transferred in 1975 to control by the Radiation Effects Research Foundation (RERF), which has its headquarters at 5-2 Hijiyama Park, Minami-Ku, Hiroshima 732, Japan. and true magnitude of the radiation risk. RERF is equally funded by the government of Japan through its Ministry of Health and Welfare and by the government of the United States via the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) under contract with the Department of Energy (DOE)…”

Each person has been exposed to a certain dose of radiation that had to be estimated later (!) Because of the location of the bomb explosion at the moment (T65D study). It is at HIGH DOSE SHORT TERM (explosion). This is in contrast to chronic low-level radiation. ICRP, UNSCEAR and BEIR exclude results that you get from high doses to the low dose effects. THIS IS A CRIME and unscientific and unethic.

K.Z. Morgan, former ICRP chairman even admitted that there is NO safe level of radiation: http://books.google.de/books?id=aAoAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA30&lpg=PA30#v=onepage&q&f=false

So, why are there radiation limits? How can that be?

Since 1927, we know the dangers of radiation: 1927 Herman J Mueller discovered in 1927 (!) the following: ARTIFICIAL TRANSMUTATION OF THE GENE by radiation – he got the The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1946: http://www.esp.org/foundations/genetics/classical/holdings/m/hjm-1927a.pdf

So, why do ICRP, UNSCEAR, IAEA, all governments, health ministries, nuke plant operators and BEIR ignore this? There are many answers. And many many questions. All lead to one goal. More on that later. The first thing is, we have to think like the atomic industry. They want to protect their ideology of former US president Dwight Eisenhower’s “Atoms for Peace”. This was made public in 1953. But, that an atom can be peaceful is unobjective. A “peaceful” atomic program even increases the risk of proliferation: Those countries which have developed and built nuclear bombs in recent decades began with a civil nuclear program. However, these civil programs were often only a cover for their military interests and provided them with access to the technologies and know-how for the design of nuclear bombs. This fact shows that the export and further proliferation of nuclear technology significantly increases the risk of nuclear weapons proliferation. Iran: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/06/23/us-afghan-withdrawal-because-of-upcoming-nuclear-attack-on-iran/ Atomic energy is also often washed green, after reading this, it won’t work any longer: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/GreenDereg.html

ATOMIC HISTORY: http://independentwho.info/Documents/Rapport_France/Rapport_Bataille_179.pdf / french consumption: http://independentwho.info/Documents/Rapport_France/Rapport_Bataille_179.pdf

In 1953 President Dwight D. Eisenhower declared war upon every citizen and living being with “The Peaceful Atom”: http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/dwightdeisenhoweratomsforpeace.html  the agenda was then further developed in 1954 with the first hydrogen bomb testing: http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/march/1/newsid_2781000/2781419.stm which changed the most important international program for radiation protection and compensation: THE ALARA PRINCIPLE:
http://hps.ne.uiuc.edu/nat​cisoe/2011%20EPRI%20ISOE%2​0Conference%20Brochure.pdf​.pdf page 5 “Plenary Session: Nuclear Power’s Mandate for Safe, Efficient and ALARA Operating Philosophy. http://hps.ne.uiuc.edu/nat​cisoe/symposiumpapers/2003​/2003SymposiumAgenda.pdf It’s magic, it’s “ICRP proven”.

As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) was replaced by: As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP): To satisfy the ALARP principle, measures necessary to reduce risk must be taken until or unless the cost of those measures, whether money, time or trouble is disproportionate to the reduction in risk.” PAGE 170 – by UK Departement of Energy & Climatechange – QUOTE:

An example: quote “as far as is practically achievable”: http://enformable.com/2011/09/scottish-nuclear-leak-will-never-be-completely-cleaned-up/

http://www.decc.gov.uk/assets/decc/11/meeting-energy-demand/consents-planning/nps2011/1925-appl-of-sust-of-revised-draft-en6.pdf
basically: Money over Health – a licence to kill. In the beginning (before the h bomb test) the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle was turned against the atomic industry. It said, that radiation exposure has to be held as low as possible, that means as low as rasonably achievable. But hydrogen bombs cause much radiation.The ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection) turned around this principle (after the first hydrogen bomb explosion in 1954): http://books.google.de/books?id=MHWEk6wZc10C&pg=RA1-PA139&dq=ICRP+ALARA+1973&hl=de&ei=yopBTvnUFNGdOpvpuagJ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CD4Q6AEwAw#v=onepage&q&f=false  quote “…economic and social…” ETHIC is missing! – so that the ALARA principle is now working FOR the atomic industry, even if a reactor crashes next to you. ICRP said, that ALARA does not refer to accidents.The ICRP also says the set of radiation levels for anticipated activities should be determined by cost-benefit analysis. Your health is a cost-benefit issue during a atomic catastrophe. Basically this means: When an accident happens (an atomic reactor crash, for example) the whole point of Status Quo is that the people are contaminated with radiation.

More of this insanity (Stanford): http://slac.stanford.edu/pubs/slacpubs/13750/slac-pub-13800.pdf – quote “On the basis of the resulting model, known as the LNT (Linear-No Threshold) model, collective dose equivalent is a good measure…” Why is this a good measure? Sternglass showed that there are 4 dose-response curves: http://books.google.de/books?id=XAcAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA29&lpg=PA29#v=onepage&q&f=false

“Presently the international organizations (WHO, IAEA) recognize as the main cause of increase of thyroid cancer in liquidators and children population after the accident their irradiation with radioactive iodine, I-131. The rest of diseases, they suppose, are provoked by psycho-emotional reactions. ” http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Burlakova.pdf The bimodal dependence of effects on dose was
revealed for all studied parameters. Namely, effects increased at low doses, reached maximum (for low doses), then decreased (in some cases the effect sign reversed) and thereafter increased with the increase of
dosage.

Why NUCLEAR reactors cause FOREST decline: “The plant must take in MUCH more air than animals to get enough carbon. Carbon 14 is produced by cosmic rays, bomb tests and nuclear power plants. By 1963, Carbon 14 in the Northern Hemisphere had increased by 100 percent, and by 1984, about one decade later, it had increased another 25 percent. An increase in radioactivity of only one percent eventually translates into a decline in tree growth of about 18 percent. It is interesting to note that a global increase of Carbon 14 – one such as has never before been seen – parallels the slowing growth and the endemic death of trees from Lebanon to the Himalayas. The decline of the forests has grown from a disturbing trend to a catastrophe of dramatic proportions. Hardly has one study on the subject been finished than it is surpassed by another bearing worse tidings. Not so long ago, the march of death was confined to certain species in certain locations – to day it is a virtually global epidemic. Fruit trees are showing the same symptoms as those of the forest. 30 percent of the fruit trees in the Canton of Thurgovi in Switzerland are destroyed. Now they fear the vineyards will follow.”

“We now have proof of the risk of interrupting the very basis of the life cycle of plants, animals and man – in brief, photosynthesis on Earth is endangered!”
“There is a fundamental difference between plants and animals, and this determines why plants are so much more sensitive to air pollution. We animals need air for its oxygen, to burn our food so as to obtain energy. The plant, however, gets almost all of its nutrition in the form of carbon, which is contained in the air in the form of carbonic acid (C02) and is made available to the plant through the process of photosynthesis.”
“The prodigious aeration of the plants explains their tremendous sensitivity to air pollution. The toxic effects of airborn pollutants show up earlier in plants than in the human.” http://www.nuclearreader.info/chapter3.html

Page 2: “Table 1 Incidence of 12 classes of disease among liquidators per 100 thousand people” – shows massive increase of diseases. Page 6 “relation between effects at low-intensive dosage and dose rate” and Page 11 “the PRESENCE of linear or linear-quadratic dependency IS NOT obligatory for the cases of diseases and deaths from malignant neoplasm at low doses”: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Burlakova.pdf

FATAL ERRORS in the ICRP model: http://www.cerrie.org/workshop/Talk_02.pdf

For if it is scandalous to die, it is even more scandalous when the traces of the dead degenerate into the death of all traces.” Atomic Industry = Invisible War: http://www.lit.kobe-u.ac.jp/philosophy/images/pdf/Paul_JOBIN/ThebaudMony-PrefaceEnglishEd.pdf

Quote: “The victims of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and patients treated with X-rays because of such dubious indications as thymus hyperplasia demonstrate the exceptionally high sensitivity of children. However, the important discovery of Stewart and coworkers in 1958 , an enhancement of childhood leukaemia following diagnostic X-ray pictures during pregnancy, listed as historic milestone by Mossman also, has provoked a deep controversy. Their findings were an impressive support of the postulated linear non-threshold relationship for leukaemia” SOURCE Page 2: http://www.staff.uni-marburg.de/~kunih/all-doc/doserele.pdf

After an atomic war, the US government suggests 10 Gray (!!!) as an acceptable dose in one year for us: QUOTE “…Almost as soon as we had begun our work, a disturbing fact emerged. All the calculations made by government agencies as to the radiation protection necessary after a full-scale nuclear war were based on the assumption that the adult could tolerate the enormous dose of 200 rads spread over a few days and as much as 1000 rads over a year. Apparently it had been decided by the government’s scientific advisory groups that it was not necessary to take into account the long-range after-effects of radiation, either on the survivors themselves or on their offspring…” by Ernest Sternglass: http://www.nucleardemolition.com/SF.pdf, PAGE 22

This was also made public in the 1963 issue of the SCIENCE magazine: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/140/3571/1102.abstract Cancer: Relation of Prenatal Radiation to Development of the Disease in Childhood.

STRONTIUM-90 IN BABY TEETH AS A FACTOR IN EARLY CHILDHOOD CANCER: http://www.radiation.org/reading/ijhs/ijhs_methods.html and: An unexpected rise in strontium-90 in US deciduous teeth in the
1990s: http://stopfplnow.org/literature/Mangano_2003_Trends_Microbiol.pdf

Sternglass is an emeritus professor at the University of Pittsburgh and Director of the Radiation and Public Health Project. He is an American physicist and author, best known for his controversial research on the health risks of low-level radiation from atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons and from nuclear power plants. This is  his study “Infant Mortality Changes Following the Three Mile Island Accident,” from 1980: http://atomichistory.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/sternglass_infantmortalitytmi.pdf quote “The discrepancy in infant deaths between the two sources for the period of April 1 through June 30, 1979, had been two; from October 1 through December 31 it had also been two. For eighty-eight to surface between July 1 and September 30, precisely in the controversial summer months after the TMI accident, seemed unlikely.”

Risk assessments of small radiation doses differ by two orders of magnitude, depending on whose theory they are applied to or which observed data is used. Unfortunately, this is not just an academic interest. The choice of a model for risk calculation can cause enormous Costs. Powerful outside interests are coming into play. The best illustration of this is the story of the BEIR III report: http://books.google.de/books?id=VAoAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA3&lpg=PA3#v=onepage&q&f=false by Joseph Rotblat

They can irradiate you and do not compensate you – and if they do, they do it with your money. No reactor is assured, mind you. Used in Belarus (Most Chernobyl affected country in the world):and now in Japan (Fukushima):

EXELON nuclear (US company) talking about ALARAhttp://www.decc.gov.uk/ass ​ets/decc/11/meeting-energy​-demand/consents-planning/​ nps2011/1925-appl-of-sust-​of-revised-draft-en6.pdf Remember: This is the only VALID and OFFICIAL angenda for compensation during an atomic accident!

The h bomb testing is the successor to the Hiroshima / Nagasaki testing (!).

But how does low radiation work? Answer: PETKAU EFFECT: http://www.esp.org/foundations/genetics/classical/holdings/m/hjm-1927a.pdf

Discovered by Abraham Petkau, 1972. He discovered: that 26 RAD per Minute (fast radiation rate) need a total dose of 3500 RAD to harm a cell membrane. With 0,001 RAD per Minute (slow dose) only 0,7 RAD are needed to harm a cell membrane. The Mechanism behind it: The production of free radicals of Oxygen (O² with a negative electric charge) caused by ionising effect of the radiation. The free radicals caused by the slow dose (0,001) are sparsely distributed radicals do have a higher chance to reach the cell membranes. Why: The free radicals of the fast radiation rate (26) are tight together and so they react faster with each other. The low electric charge of the cell membranes attract the free radicals in the early state of the reaction (minor total dose).

The indirect chemical damage to cell membranes in the low dose range is much more important than the direct effect of radiation on the nucleus with its genetic material. In the nucleus there appears to be much stronger repair mechanisms than in the cell membranes. This is consistent with the purposes of evolution: Increasingly higher development of life. First and foremost, namely the genes in the nucleus had greatly developed by repair mechanisms to be protected. Only then could the nature of the gene pool protect itself against the highly damaging properties of natural radiation, and thus maintain the relative stability of species over millions of years.

If the harmed cells are monocytes this will cause: Anemia, because the monocytes recycle 37 – 40 % of the iron of dying red blood cells. Weakened immune system in the cells, because the monocytes generate the substance which activates the immune system of the lymphocytes. This is the so called “Bura Bura” – of Hiroshima and Nagasaki survivors.  Routine radioactive emissions are dangerous because they are the main source of low-level radiation. Strong radiation comes from large accidents. Petkau discovered that the response is logarithmic to radiation, that means, concave downward. So the risk is higher at low doses of radiation than larger ones. The damage to the immune system due to low-level radiation can be controlled to some extent by measures that strengthen the immune system: antioxidant, vitamin C, vitamin E. The biochemical mechanisms by which the immune system is damaged, are different from the damage to the DNA caused by high radiation doses. If you have low-level radiation in addition to other mechanisms, the formation of free radicals by antioxidants such as vitamin C or E can be lifted. The only way to really deal with the problem of low-level radiation, is, as soon as possible to switch off any atomic reactor .

Sources:

> Petkau A. Effects of 22 Na + on phospholipid membrane injury to irradiated erythrocytes. Radiation Research 1968, 34:335-346.
>Sternglass EJ. Implication of dose-rate dependent cell-membrane damage for the biological effets of medical and environmental radiation. Proceedings of the symposium on population exposures, Knoxville TN, October 21-23, 1974. (CONF-741 018)

Radiation particles, directly hit the protoplasm and not the nucleus. they leave behind damage, which is only noticeable when these cells divide again. So instabilities occur in the chromosomes, the genes and genetic information. Instabilities that are not visible in the first, but especially in the second and third generation increase disease susceptibility: http://www.independentwho.info/Presse_ecrite/09_05_27_Salzburger_DE.pdf

But in contrast to the gene pool, individual members of populations (plants, animals, people) for the evolution are not so important to the contrary, her constant death and her replacement by reproduction is an important evolutionary process. The repair mechanisms in the cell membranes were needed, but weren’t  so important, because you only caused diseases, but no genetic defects. And if one member of a population has fulfilled its evolutionary role of reproduction, sit is no longer needed, so a life extension beyond the reproductive age is also not absolutely necessary. This is for the survival of animals and plant species are not necessarily problematic, however, for human society. Each individual hopes to a long and healthy life, far beyond reproduction age. In addition, an adaptation to environmental toxic substances in humans is not possbile, because of the generational change phaes which are very long. But we add more radiation by atomic energy with it’s low radiation emission, accidents, catastrophes – which are peeks.

Internal irradiation happens when radioactive material is ingested into the body(…) Inhaling even the tiniest particle, that’s the danger. making comparisons with X-rays and CT scans has no meaning. Because you can breathe in radioactive material… quote: http://www.independentwho.info/Presse_ecrite/11_03_28_TakashiHirose_EN.pdf

For years, scientists have established a causal relationship between radiation exposure and hypothyroidism. In particular, radioactive iodine (which seeks out the thyroid gland, and destroys cells) is linked with the disease. Here it is: “GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION IN U.S. THYROID CANCER INCIDENCE, AND A CLUSTER NEAR NUCLEAR REACTORS IN NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK, AND PENNSYLVANIA” http://www.radiation.org/reading/pubs/091116Thyroidcancer.pdf During pregnancy, thyroid gland controls Brain Growth of Fetus

Carbon 14 is a natural emitter. But the man made C14 id added by atomic bomb tests. C14 was “forgotten” to measure untill 1973. It’s halflife: 5730 years. It causes cancer and in the long term genetic damage. Source: http://www.springerlink.com/content/j354787301473​21q/ by Robert Pohl. It was increased in the nothern troposphere by 100% by the bomb tests. 1984 by 25%: http://www.osti.gov/energy​citations/product.biblio.j​sp?osti_id=5299106

Let’s continue with our story. Now, the post h-bomb era: In 1959 the WHO was gagged by the WHA 12-40 contract with the IAEA: http://www.independentwho.info/Documents/M_Fernex/ChernobylCatastrophe_Fernex_EN.pdf Doctors of the UN are not allowed to accept or release studies about radiation health issues without the validation of the atomic industryhttp://mondediplo.com/2008/04/14who and: http://www.independentwho.info/WHA_12_40_EN.php?sous_menu=onu and: http://www.independentwho.info/presse_EN.php

The statutes of the IAEA: http://www.independentwho.info/Documents/ONU/statut_AIEA_EN.pdf / http://www.independentwho.info/documentation_EN.php

MORE:

http://www.independentwho.info/Presse_ecrite/11_05_06_DW-World_EN.pdf

http://www.independentwho.info/Presse_ecrite/09_05_29_Guardian_EN.pdf

http://www.independentwho.info/Presse_ecrite/11_04_27_IPS_EN.pdf

http://www.independentwho.info/Presse_ecrite/11_05_05_IPS_EN.pdf

Then, Chernobyl and Fukushima were used to increase background radiation – in order to accelerate and alter evolution. Please keep in mind, that it was natural radiation (not man made) that caused EVOLUTION, but also mutation, diabilities and cancer. Quote “When I looked back to see what was said to be the radiation level–just in North America–it used to be that we got sixty millirem a year background radiation–that was the measurement. Then it went up to about a hundred. And then I heard a hundred and twenty and they’re now saying two hundred.  Now there are some reasons for it. That first number, sixty, didn’t have radon gas in it. Radon gas is generally released by uranium mining and it now bathes all of North America and it’s pocketed more in some places than others. Also our construction has dug into ore beds and we’ve released a lot of radiation. “ – source: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/inetSeries/RB89.html

“People who live along a transportation route are assumed automatically by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission to get the equivalent of two or three chest X-rays a year–just if you live along the transportation route. That means no accident, no stopping, no nothing.” quote from: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/inetSeries/RB89.html

We now are in the progress of a new evolution – it’s called ATOMIC DARWINISM: http://tekknorg.wordpress.​com/2011/07/15/less-girls-​are-born-because-of-nuclea​r-power-global-population-​growth-control/ Examples: The ICRP refers to any unusual bleeding disorders found in Hiroshima and Nagasaki just as misdiagnosis: http://books.google.de/boo ​ks?id=lgYAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA26​&lpg=PA26&dq=radiation+sta​ ndards+robert+alvarez&sour​ce=bl&ots=Tmi95_Q6DT&sig=L​ Q7coEWdFM6NMtzrfjw60nJEoWQ​&hl=de&ei=o-o2TqOkCoPMswaI​ r4m6Ag&sa=X&oi=book_result​ &ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0C​CQQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=radi​ ation%20standards%20robert​%20alvarez&f=false . and: http://www.helmholtz-muenchen.de/ibb/homepage/hagen.scherb/KusmierzVoigtScherb2010BonnProceedings%20short.pdf

The Codex Alimentarius Commission http://www.codexalimentarius.net/web/index_en.jsp at its 18th Session (Geneva 1989) adopted Guideline Levels for Radionuclides in Foods Following Accidental Nuclear Contamination. The Guideline Levels which are in this publication remain applicable for one year following a nuclear accident: http://www.criirad.org/actuali​tes/dossiers2005/menacesradioa​ctivesaliments/codexanglais198​9.pdf

ALERT: Fish near Fukushima at 4000% above Codex Alimentarius limit for radioactive I-131 – Oct 2011

Prof. Jacobi – Director of the Institute for Radiation Protection of the Society for Radiation and Environmental Research Ltd. Munich (http://www.iaea.org/inis/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/04/091/4091257.pdf) – Neaherbergm, said in  his speech from March 3rd 1973, that he is representing a maximum acceptable radiation risk of the population (without asking them!) and assumed that a civilizational radiation risk exists only when it is visible. The risk would be only low (and therefore should be acceptable and useful), that in the existing natural (spontaneous) frequency of cancer of the total population it would be not detected! For Germany, it seemed (in 2350 spontaneous cancer deaths per million inhabitants), a maximum of ten deaths per year and per million inhabitants is ACCEPTABLE! That makes (80 million people in Germany) 800 cancer deaths by nuclear power stations per year, ACCEPTABLE! Is this still a democracy? Such a drug might would have never get the permission to come on the market! But it is nuclear energy, which is allowed! Thus ANY MURDER WOULD BE ACCEPTABLE, because people die anyway!

Quote: “One also needs to recognise that practically all protection measures undertaken in the USSR after the accident at the Chernobyl NPP have failed, such as iodine prophylactics, ban on consumption of contaminated foodstuffs, decontamination of affected settlements, attempts to improve the life standards in the affected areas, etc. The same happened to the state financial support of the people from the affected territories because the inevitably arbitrary allocations have produced an opposite effect, i.e. feeling of inequality and jealousy.” – PAGE 4, left bottom: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Malko3.pdf ALSO on PAGE 4: right, top: The “350 mSv Concept” – which is an equivalent of 500 mammograms per year! For Children!

Remember: Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology says 3.8 microsieverts per hour o.k., that’s more than 33 millisieverts (mSv) per year. For children, kindergartens, nursery, primary and junior high schools. That’s an equivalent of 50 mammograms. And now add the irradiated food, the irradiatesd water… add the altered genes, mixed up now and in future generations. Human Fetus radiation tolerance: ZERO. Source: http://peaceandhealthblog.com/2011/04/26/children-of-fukushima/ and: http://www.ippnw.de/commonFiles/pdfs/Atomenergie/Reference_Embryo.pdf

In contrast: “…To provide an adequate safety standard the dose limit of 1 mSv/y have to be reduced to 0.02 mSv/y or 20 µSv/y.”Page 9:  http://www.staff.uni-marburg.de/~kunih/all-doc/stoakuni.pdf by Dr. Horst Kuni, Nuclear Medicine, University Professor.

MODIFICATIONS IN CARDIAC-VASCULAR SYSTEM OF
CHILDREN, LIVING IN CONTAMINATED WITH RADIOISOTOPES
TERRITORY: http://chernobyl-today.org/images/stories/Bandajevski_2001_Radiocaesium_and_heart.pdf
Clinical investigations included the following groups:
1. Children aged between 3 – 7 years (227 individuals),
living in Gomel (soil contamination with 137Cs was 1-5
Ci/km2);
2. Children aged between 6 – 8 years (76 individuals), living
in Vetka (soil contamination with 137Cs was 15 – 40
Ci/km2);
3. Children aged between 7 – 16years (55 individuals), living
in Svetilovichi (soil contamination with 137Cs was 15 – 40
Ci/km2);
4. Children aged between 3 – 7 years (104 individuals),
living in Grodno (soil contamination with 137Cs was less
than 1 Ci/km2) – the first control group;
5. Children aged between 10 – 15 years (50 individuals),
living in Minsk (soil contamination with 137Cs was less
than 1 Ci/km2) – the second control group;
6. Children aged between 3 – 7 years (118 individuals),
living in Zhlobin (soil contamination with 137Cs was less
than 1 Ci/km2);
7. Children aged between 14 days and 14 months (155
individuals) and their mothers, constantly living in Gomel
and in Gomel localities and having hospital treatment in
Gomel Children’s District Clinical Hospital;
8. Children aged between 8 – 15 years (211 individuals)
with chronic pathology of gastro-intestinal tract, constantly
living on the territory with the level of soil contamination
with 137Cs from 1 to 15 Ci/km2 and having hospital
treatment in Gomel Children’s District Clinical Hospital;
9. Students of Gomel Medical Institute aged between 18 –
20 years (197 individuals).

http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Lazjuk.pdf Genetic Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident for Belarus Republic – Register exists since 1982 – although the IAEA denies this!

We are even aging faster because of low radiation: The complex mechanisms of premature senescence http://www.ratical.com/radiation/Chernobyl/Fig01.html

The invention of trivialization of nuclear accidents, made in Germany, 1975: Quote P.17 “The next logical step is to embed residual risks in a spectrum of natural risks such as earthquakes, lightning, and the like…”: http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Admin/PUB/Documents/RR-76-001.p
Wolf Härtele, 1976, in JAPAN, he is a Swabian pastor’s (!) son, Physicist, advocate of fast breeder technology and preferred disciple of Carl Friedrich von Weizsacker My Source: Book: The Atomic State – by Robert Jungk.  Häfele impressed with this risk philosohpy also the Church and Society of the World Council of Churches, which took his arguments for the debate book “Facing Up to Nuclear Power”:
http://www.amazon.de/Facing-Nuclear-Power-Contribution-Potentialities/dp/0715203401 And this was the end of the fast breeder program: http://www.chernobylcongress.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/Baverstock_How_the_UN_works.pdf quote: “In about 1980 Gian-Carlo Pinchera, an Italian nuclear physicist, showed that fast reactors were inherently unsafe. That single conference paper led to the almost total abandonment of the fast breeder programme. (…) he warned “beware the dying kick of the nuclear advocates.” This is what we see today but maybe they are not dying!”  quote by Keith Baverstock.

On May 4th 2011, Secretary General Margaret Chan of the W.H.O. said: “There is no safe low levels of radiation, ” more: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/05/12/w-h-o-secretary-general-chan-admits-for-the-first-time-in-52-years-radiation-is-always-dangerous/

CHILDREN:

Nobel peace laureate Linus Pauling proved, that by fallout of the atomic and h bomb tests of 1958 15.000 children with severe hereditary error came to the world in one year. 38,000 children were born dead. 90,000 were murdered inside of the mother.  http://books.google.de/books?id=2QduA19d_X8C&pg=PA1310&dq=Linus+Pauling:+Biomolecular+sciences+90,000&hl=de&ei=tXlGTuMWg8PxA4rQscoG&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CDEQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false In 1963 the radioactivity in milk was so high, the public got alarmed. But the USAEC denied everything. Former President Kennedy held his speech and demanded the bomb test stop. Ironically, the health authorities were particularly zealous advocates of nuclear bombs Supporters. CARBON 14 is a real danger. It natural and man made.

On April 25th 1953 the US tested an atomic bomb in Nevada: http://www.nytimes.com/2003/04/18/nyregion/book-examines-nevada-test-that-left-fallout-in-troy-ny.html Fallout and strong rain went down on New York, parts of Vermont and Masachusetts. Half a million people were affected. 270,000 micro curie were measured in the City “Troy”. The NRC standard is 100 micro curie. But the USAEC didn’t make epidemiological study. Chance missed, Nuclear 1, Humanity ZERO. 1962; Ralph E. Lapp, “Nevada Test Fallout and Radioiodine in Milk,”: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/137/3532/756.abstract

Child mortality from pneumonia and influenza was increased between 1950 and 1965 (http://www.independentwho.info/histoire_EN.php) by the atomic and h bomb fallout. Low radiation (Petkau Effect) damaged the immune system. So, children were killed by influenza and pneumonia: 400,000 dead children. After the atomic bomb test stop from 1963, the curve went down. See the US Vital Staistics: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/vsus.htm The bomb tests killed 2 – 3,000,000 children! Less rain ment less children mortality. Compare New Mexico. http://books.google.de/books?id=wAcAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA41#v=onepage&q&f=false

Childhood Cancer in the Vicinity of German Nuclear Power Plants http://ippnw.org/pdf/mgs/6-1-korblein.pdf and: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2007/12/17/german-kikk-study-higher-cancer-risc-next-to-atomic-power-plants-unofficial-belarussian-children-cancer-data/

This is proven also by the Bob Hopkins study from 1973. The Department of Public Health proved with the study of Kurihara “cancer mortality for selected sites in 24 countries japan society” from nov 1972 Tohoku /Japan, that there was an 600 % increase in children mortality of japanese chidren age 5 till 9 years, after the Hrioshima and Nagasaki atomic test.

No dictator has ever had so much power! To kill future generations!

Intelligence and Brain Damage in Children Acutely Irradiated in Utero As a Result of the Chernobyl Accident – Department of Neurology, Institute for Clinical Radiology, Research Centre for Radiation Medicine of Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, WHO Collaborative Centre: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr79/kr79pdf/Nyagu.pdf

You think you know all? Think again: In 1984 the bulletin of american scientist gave out a Tritium Warning: http://books.google.de/books?id=3gUAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA56&lpg=PA56#v=onepage&q&f=false

Important for Japan: POLIKARPOV, G. G. 1966. RADIOECOLOGY of AQUATIC organisms. English transl. edited by V. Schultz and A. Please look at the pages: 281 (PDF page) or respectively on “printed” 292 document page for a table of doses of ionizing radiation for marine and freshwater organisms: http://www.osti.gov/bridge/purl.cover.jsp?purl=/5557734-tlwxvK/

Low Radiation and AQUA Life: in this context: ZINC 65 detected in oysters, 300 (!) miles downstream from HANFORD USA, in Willapa bay PAGE 20 right: http://books.google.de/books?id=5gUAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA20&dq=hanford+worker+zinc+65+was+detected&hl=de&ei=97E5Tt6xMsiv8gOkqLTjCA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CC4Q6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=hanford%20worker%20zinc%2065%20was%20detected&f=false

Mice developed a new type of cancer, AFTER 25 GENERATIONS (quote: “unusual cancer after 25 generations” at http://books.google.de/books?id=3gUAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA56&lpg=PA56#v=onepage&q=mewissen%20fo-cuses%20on%2025&f=false)! And 10 Generations – By Tritium / H³! Source: http://www.nirs.org/radiation/tritium/abstr10.pdf and http://www.nirs.org/radiation/tritium/abstr14.pdf Tritium is released from every nuclear power plant in the world. During the revision of a reactor up to 5 million Becquerel per liter of air! https://tekknorg.wordpress​.com/2011/07/18/reactors-e​mitting-tritium-during-nor​mal-mode-children-cancer/ Tritium is a radioactive gas, highly toxic if inhaled. It falls to earth with precipitation in the form of tritiated water. The tritium atoms can replace hydrogen atoms (about half the atoms of the human body are composed of hydrogen) and in the form of tritiated water, the isotope of hydrogen can enter the food chain and set in the body, leading to damage and mutations in DNA. Nuclear facilities emit considerable amounts of tritium which makes the water radioactive. By cooling towers and other ways. This is the reason for rising children cancer rates near nuclear reactors:http://www.fraw.org.uk/mei/archive/magnox_a1_28.pdf

Mice are mammals, show mutation earlier than we – who are alos mammals.

Teratological effects and mutations through radiation – ignored by IAEA, OECD, ICRP, UNSCEAR, SCIENCE – proven by Étienne Wolff in the 1930ies: http://books.google.com/books/about/Th%C3%A8ses_pr%C3%A9sent%C3%A9es_%C3%A0_la_Facult%C3%A9_des.html?id=MQvwcQAACAAJ and: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,862623,00.html and: http://www.ijdb.ehu.es/web/paper.php?doi=041944cg&a=f

Insects and their fast mutagenic “reaction” on low radiation are some kind of early warning system for us humans: Irradiated Insects in Japan: http://www.freeml.com/bl/8694840/25149/ normal insects soon only in the laboratory: http://www.wissenskunst.ch/en/tschernobyl.htm Great book about mutagentic impact on insects worldwide: http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/3908247314/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=thtefi-21&linkCode=as2&camp=1634&creative=6738&creativeASIN=3908247314 Reduced abundance of insects and spiders linked to radiation at Chernobyl: http://cricket.biol.sc.edu/chernobyl/papers/moller-mousseau-biol-letters-09.pdf please have a look at this beautiful book – in english: http://radionucleide.free.fr/Stresseurs/fulltext_punaise.pdf and in german: http://www.sensigns.ch/db/daten/dokumente/Heteroptera_Deutsch.pdf

Because reactors depend on heavy water as a moderator, they release larger amounts of tritium to the environment than light water reactors (…) Tritium is a carcinogen, mutagen, teratogen and developmental toxin. It becomes incorporated into DNA and disrupts the genetic code of men’s and women’s reproductive cells: http://www.iicph.org/files/IICPH-Final-Statement-re-Darlington-NNPP-May-17-2011.pdf – current Guideline and Drinking Water Quality Standard for tritium is 7,000 Bq/L, which is based on the permissible ICRP dose limit of 1 mSv/year (lowered to 0.1 mSv in water). This “standard” corresponds to a risk of 350 excess fatal cancers per million people from just one year’s consumption of drinking water, not a lifetime (70 years) 300 million people living in the US: 105,000 DEATHS PER YEAR x 30 years = 3,150,000 murdered people by the peaceful atom! Multiplied x global = weapons of mass destruction

“But tritium can be deadly (…) However tritium behaves chemically and biochemically like ordinary hydrogen. When ingested, it can incorporate itself into all forms of body cells, including those of the reproductive system…” Source: http://ratical.org/radiation/KillingOurOwn/KOO10.html

Even the NRC (While external exposure to tritium is not a major concern, tritium incorporated into the genetic material of organisms is of concern because of its ability to produce chromosome breaks and mutations, quote source: http://www.osti.gov/bridge/servlets/purl/5529013-BMHYUp/5529013.pdf) and IAEA (Source: Tritium in Some Typical Ecosystems, 1981 technical meeting http://www.iaea.org/inis/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/14/773/14773665.pdf) admitted, that Tritium is a problem, by the (then) year 2000.

A few months after Three Mile Island a study was made public – which showed a 2,5 times increase in children leukemia: http://books.google.de/boo ​ks?id=Clrz_0sJZrQC&pg=PA29​6&lpg=PA296&dq=joseph+lyon​ +new+england+journal+of+me​dicine&source=bl&ots=BddTd​ pYt7g&sig=GsBQGEGS8u2KHHQQ​SL7_CsBe6DM&hl=de&ei=Cu02T​ uCUGYXxsgaXuaC5Ag&sa=X&oi=​book_result&ct=result&resn​ um=5&ved=0CEgQ6AEwBA#v=one​page&q=joseph%20lyon%20new​ %20england%20journal%20of%​20medicine&f=false But the US health office under Dr. Arnold Müller ignored this. The predecessor of Müller was Prof. Leod: http://atomichistory.wordp​ress.com/2009/09/13/dr-gor​don-macleod-on-tmi/ He agreed to the study of Josep Lyon and was FIRED.

Atomic Industry knows no freedom of speech, underimes law and democracy: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/07/24/japan-goes-the-same-way-as-belarus-dictatorship-a-deep-insight/ and: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/07/12/france-atomic-industry-knows-no-freedom-of-speech-the-epr-junk-reactor/

Japan officials are going to call radiation measurements illegal and that they are disturbing the industry. Health plays no role. They are adapting the IAEA ideology of Radiophobia: The fear of radiation is worse than the radiation. And the declining birth rates among belarusians under the age of 30 – declared by the IAEA with “Radiophobia”: http://www.iaea.org/inis/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/28/073/28073803.pdf – quote “2. PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACTS OF NUCLEAR ACCIDENTS : Soon after the discovery of ionizing radiation, it was realized that radiation could harmfully affect skin tissues, body organs and the human body as a whole beside the genetic effects. Lately after the drop of the first atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki and also after Three-Miles-Island and Chernobyl accidents anew phenomenon described as RADIOPHOBIA have become apparent and widely spread..” PAGE 338. More on Chernobyl: http://www.euradcom.org/publications/chernobylebook.pdf Civil Society with it’s Fukushima NGOs will become a threat to the poitical level and hunted down like in Belarus. Costs make pressure. Pressure destroys the democracy. No country in the world can pay for an atomic accident. Not a single reactor is assured, it’s simpy too expensive. Japanese government wants to reduce evacuation zone: http://mdn.mainichi.jp/mdnnews/national/archive/news/2011/07/15/20110715p2g00m0dm012000c.html 1996 said the belarusian president Lukashenko during a meeting of the IAEA: “We encourage people to come back. We will open the shops again and enable the people to return to their evacuated towns and villages.” National statements were made by the President of Belarus, Mr. A. Lukashenko: http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Magazines/Bulletin/Bull383/box1.html and:  http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/1996/inf510.shtml

This is an example from Japan: http://fukushima-diary.com/2011/08/column-what-is-the-purpose-of-people-to-call-us-paranoid/

Japan could use the The daiyo kangoku justice system (http://www.amnesty.org/en/region/japan/report-2011) against whistleblowers and civil society. And Saiban-in (Lay Judge) System http://www.amnestyusa.org/research/reports/annual-report-japan-2011?page=2

The Chernobyl aid-program in Belarus was stopped in 1994 / 95: PAGE 62 of this presentation : http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/NesterenkoChernobyl-Belarus.pdf and a new “pro nuclear” program replaced it, with help of the atomic industry: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/03/18/core-a-chernobyl-aid-program-that-kills/

And we, the “other” people are also radiation victims, we know nothing about the global radiation: There are 60 certified radionuclide stations fully equipped with high precision detectors that are set up around the world to monitor airborne radioactivity on a daily basis with unprecedented accuracy. Their objective : Find low quantities of radioactive particles that could reveal a possible nuclear test in violation of the Comprehensive nuclear test ban treaty (TICEN): http://petitions.criirad.org/?For-a-total-transparency-on-the

Krypton 85 is emitted from nuclear power plants and bruises the skin on more than 2 millimeters, which could be the cause for skin cancer. W.L. Boeck – President of the krypton 85 Working Group of the IAEA said in 1976 that the electrical conductivity of the air over oceans could be increased by 43 %. Result would be more lightning and unexpected weather phenomena: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/193/4249/195.extract

It also seems that low radiation kills us, by weakening of our immune system, thus we become more vulnerable to simple diseases. For example, accumulation of allergies.. large parts of the population can be so in 10 years or more, simply shut down: http://books.google.de/books?id=gjIzAAAAMAAJ – it’s some kind of genetic clean out.

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/grndwtr-contam-tritium.html – quote: “Tritium is a mildly radioactive type of hydrogen that occurs both naturally and during the operation of nuclear power plants.” PAGE 1

in contrast:

http://www.fraw.org.uk/mei/archive/magnox_a1_28.pdf – and:

http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/documents/WS1_thiel_Increased_Leukaemia_childhood_engl.pdf – quote: “The low-level radiation -and not “coincidence”- remains the only plausible explanation of the increased cancer rates.” PAGE 5

By low-level radiation from accidents and tritium emissions from cooling towers less girls are born:

http://www.tschernobylkongress.de/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/ScherbVoigt_fehlbildungen_fehlende_geburten.pdf – quote: “The gender gap in 1987 – 2007 (Chernobyl gender gap) corresponds to approximately 440 000 theoretical missing female births when only the female sex was affected. If also male births were affected at a ratio of male: female = 3:10, is the gender gap by about 790 000 (180 000 +610 000) male + female births” PAGE 32

More about Birth Sex Odds and Sex Odds Ratios around atomic industry: http://www.helmholtz-muenchen.de/ibb/homepage/hagen.scherb/proceedings.html

Increased sex ratio in Bavaria (Germany):
after Chernobyl and in the vicinity of Nuclear Power Plants –
epidemiological findings: http://www.tschernobylkongress.de/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/Koerblein_sexratio.pdf

What meaning might lie behind it? Fewer women means fewer people. Nuclear power is probably an instrument to curb population growth.

Tests with dogs in 1977 have proven, that small doses cause leukemia: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.go​v/pmc/articles/PMC2032130/ BEIR / ICRP talk this down and ignore it!

More about latency and leukemia: “Once the latency period has passed, a certain type of cancer will continue to appear year after year in a group of humans subjected years before to known ionizing radiation. Acute leukemias due to irradiation continue to appear in apparently undiminished numbers, consistently even 20 years after the Hiroshima-Nagasaki bombing. One form of leukemia, so-called chronic myelogenous leukemia, seems to appear among the exposed population steadily over a period of about 10 years and then to appear less frequently.” SOURCE: http://ratical.org/radiati​on/CNR/PP/chp3.html Table of Contents: http://ratical.org/radiati​on/CNR/PP/index.html#TOC

ONE radiograph during pregnancy: 20 % increase for cancer probability before the child is 10 years old. Two radiographs during pregnancy: 28 %. Three: 70 %. FOUR:…. 100 PERCENT. There is NO SAFE LEVEL OF RADIATION EXPOSURE: http://books.google.de/books?id=aAoAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA30&lpg=PA30&dq=cancer+stewart+xray+1970+radiographs&source=bl&ots=UGZYt0TZGo&sig=ENE9wYZjjNs3Rh2XyptdZwP3Ucw&hl=de&ei=7545Tu6iF8aAOsLrvbMG&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&sqi=2&ved=0CBsQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false

The cancer risk of a child can be doubled by one or two x-rays (10 – 20 mGy) on the pregnant mother before the birth of the child, if it is done in the last months before birth. Atenth of the dose is enough, if the x-ray is made ​​in the first months of life. Source: MacMahon B Prenatal x-ray exposure and childhood cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1962;28(1):173-191. 

No One Escapes Harm: The Essential Story of In-Utero Irradiation http://ratical.org/radiation/CNR/No1Escapes.html

Until 1990 ICRP said it is not necessary to evacuate people, as long as the radiation does not exceed 500 mSv. Then they lowered it from 100 mSv to 20 milli sievert (2000 percent increase for children) which Japan implemented. Which is an equivalent of 50 mammograms: http://books.google.de/books?id=Ber3ENERfGwC&pg=PA343&lpg=PA343&dq=ICRP+40++500mSv&source=bl&ots=IaOqT2MqK2&sig=l3l0MYGe_nKkaXxvFZxkkG8hP5M&hl=de&ei=gc81TpqyI4PfsgajxLG5Ag&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=8&ved=0CE0Q6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=ot%20exceed%20500%20mSv.%20The%20ICRP&f=false

Teratological effects and mutations through radiation – ignored by IAEA, OECD, ICRP, UNSCEAR, SCIENCE – proven by Étienne Wolff in the 1930ies: http://books.google.com/books/about/Th%C3%A8ses_pr%C3%A9sent%C3%A9es_%C3%A0_la_Facult%C3%A9_des.html?id=MQvwcQAACAAJ and: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,862623,00.html and: http://www.ijdb.ehu.es/web/paper.php?doi=041944cg&a=f

The IAEA is everywhere, this watchdog is an advertising agency for the military and the atomic industry. They even gagged the WHO. This is how they work: By mid 1998 first draft of the Guidelines was circulating between IAEA and WHO at the management level. Although there had been a clear agreement between the two organisations at the management level and the work had taken place openly the IAEA withdrew
at that stage strongly advising that the whole issue should either be dropped or revised. The issue was the proposal to lower the action level for implementation from 100mGy to 10mGy dose to the thyroid’s of children.”

I think that increased thyroid cancer incidence of children from irradiated parents would be first manifestation of the induced genomic instability: http://vivretchernobyl.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/presentation-of-rosa-goncharova-genomic-instability-after-chernobyl-prognosis-for-the-coming-generations/

Rosa Goncharova‘s geneticist. In the Belarusian capital Minsk, she directs the laboratory of the Institute of Genetics and Cytology of the Belorussian Academy of Sciences. For decades, the research professor and her team investigated the effects of long-lasting radioactive low-level radiation.

What harm take people living in contaminated areas?

“Must live”, because there are 2600 villages that should relocate. Rosa Gonchrova summarizes the results of their studies (in german):

http://www.hr-online.de/servlet/de.hr.cms.servlet.File/11-042?enc=d3M9aHJteXNxbCZibG9iSWQ9MTIwMTQ3NTImaWQ9NDExMDgxNDEmZm9yY2VEb3dubG9hZD0x

TRANSLATION

“One of the main lessons learned from Chernobyl is the fact that even low doses of ionizing radiation in animals and humans have biological and genetic consequences. This is now proven. They produce damage in the body cells and in the sex cells. Even at a low dose of less than 100 micro Sievert and even years at a tolerated dose of one millisievert were identified in our laboratory genetic changes.”

“About one Milllisievert per year: This is the annual dose limit for people who do not work professionally with ionizing radiations. For occupationally exposed persons in Europe are higher limits. The research team has identified mutations, ie changes in the genes of the nucleus.”

“Man, like every other living being possesses, protection systems, the repair such mutations almost. If there is now under the influence of radioactivity additional mutations, the organism will be charged additionally, he must also fight against it.”

“For these children we have found changes in individual genes. And the worst part is that these children show an increased sensitivity to other unfavorable factors. That is, these children fall ill more frequently than others. Among the unfavorable factors include poor diet, environmental factors, chemical pollution. This is true not only for children but for adults too. They all have an increased sensitivity to other unfavorable factors.”

“In plain English: who spends his life in contaminated areas spend, must, whose immune system is weakened.”

Radioactivity, as it opens the doors for other health problems.

The most dangerous radiation is which is ingested with food. Thus, for example, cesium-137 from the inside to act on the cells, because it displaces the vital potassium in muscle tissue. Or strontium-90, a radionuclide that accumulates in the bone and bone marrow: there can damage blood cells and can cause cancer such as blood.”

– On the question of whether changes in the genetic inheritance of future generations, says geneticist Rose Goncharova: “We demonstrated in our laboratory for the first time that genetic changes over generations may be swept on. We have found after Chernobyl more than 22 animal generations of genetic instability. There are animals that live in the contaminated areas who have to live under the influence of low doses. We have been scientifically proven.”

“This has been proven in one of the most common mammals in the bank vole. The cells of these mice were well comparable with those of humans, says the researcher. Therefore one can transmit many findings to him.”

“Even after 22 generations of mice you can still see changes, mutations. They are inherited. The radioactivity is harmful. So it happens that many offspring do not survive or even many embryos. Those who survive are somehow cope with the situation. But whose genome is unstable, and they also pass into the next generation. And often they are ill. Their whole system is more unstable than in other animals.”

“The mortality rate in these animals is very, very high. Mice produce very many offspring, and therefore they can afford a high death rate. Man, however, will usually produce only one child. In any case, not five, six, seven at once. He also does not bring several generations in a year or during his life to the world. So we can also transmit the results that actually would be transferable to humans, not in all respects to him.”

Which low doses of radiation effects in humans may have, but points to a study that was published in December 2010 in Germany. It states: Within a radius of 35 km around a nuclear plant are fewer girls were born in areas without nuclear power. We investigated the surroundings of 27 facilities in Germany and four in Switzerland. Fewer female births have been noted previously: In regions that were hit by the Chernobyl radioactive precipitation. It is believed that female embryos are more sensitive to radiation and therefore die rather than male.”

“Managerial level of IAEA refuses to endorse the report and refuses to endorse the report but WHO publishes Guidelines in 1999 but IAEA describes them as “DRAFT” and WHO Geneva agrees: http://www.chernobylcongress.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/Baverstock_How_the_UN_works.pdf

The WHO published it: http://www.who.int/ionizing_radiation/pub_meet/Iodine_Prophylaxis_guide.pdf and http://books.google.de/books?id=bJWyU5i-ou0C&pg=PA169&dq=keith+baverstock+Iodine&hl=de&ei=J-QlTqnhEc-aOsik6bkK&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCoQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=keith%20baverstock%20Iodine&f=false

Then: The dose of cesium 137 and strontium 90, which causes stomach cancer is less than 1 Centigray per year. At the same time, the IAEA said that this dose is about 100 per year Centigray. Both results are from the same foundations. In animals, resulting in about 25MsV reparation, there is no lack of effects at radiation doses below 1 Centigray. (P.143 of the book “IPPNW” (peace nobel prize) people’s tribunal 1996 Chernobyl”. quote by Dr. Katsumi Furitsu, Osaka, Japan. I’ve met her:

quote by Dr. Rosalia Bertell, November 1999 issue of The Ecologist, pp. 408-411: http://ratical.org/radiation/NAvictims.html

The main way in which the “radiation protection industry” has succeeded in hugely underrating the ill-health caused by nuclear power is by insisting on a group of extremely restrictive definitions as to what qualifies as a radiation-caused illness statistic. For example, under IAEA’s criteria:

>    If a radiation-caused cancer is not fatal, it is not counted in the IAEA’s figures

>    If a cancer is initiated by another carcenogen, but accelerated or promoted by exposure to radiation, it is not counted.

>    If an auto-immune disease or any non-cancer is caused by radiation, it is not counted.

>    Radiation-damaged embryos or foetuses which result in miscarriage or stillbirth do not count

>    A congenitally blind, deaf or malformed child whose illnesses are are radiation-related are not included in the figures because this is not genetic damage, but rather is teratogenic, and will not be passed on later to the child’s offspring.

>    Causing the genetic predisposition to breast cancer or heart disease does not count since it is not a “serious genetic disease” in the Mendelian sense.

>    Even if radiation causes a fatal cancer or serious genetic disease in a live born infant, it is discounted if the estimated radiation dose is below 100 mSv [mSv= millisievert, a measurement of radiation exposure. One hundred millsievert is the equivalent in radiation of about 100 X-Rays].

>    Even if radiation causes a lung cancer, it does not count if the person smokes — in fact whenever there is a possibility of another cause, radiation cannot be blamed.

>    If all else fails, it is possible to claim that radiation below some designated dose does not cause cancer, and then average over the whole body the radiation dose which has actually been received by one part of the body or even organ, as for instance when radio-iodine concentrates in the thyroid. This arbitrary dilution of the dose will ensure that the 100 mSv cut-off point is nowhere near reached. It is a technique used to dismiss the sickness of Gulf War veterans who inhaled small particles of ceramic uranium which stayed in their lungs for more than two years, and in their bodies for more than eight years, irradiating and damaging cells in a particular part of the body.

Last but not least, we should know, that atomic reactors and atomic bombs are siamese twins:

The Atomic Explosion at an Atomic Reactor – THIS COULD BE THE FINAL BLOW against the atomic industry ONCE AND FOREVER!

Cobalt 60 was detected in Kashiwa shi of Chiba. It proves reactor 3 had an atomic explosion, and it proves gov / tepco are still hiding most important facts.It’s very natural to think there may be way more things concealed: http://10401.blog.fc2.com/blog​-entry-88.htm (now taken offline). But they also found Cobalt 60 in seafood: http://www.scribd.com/doc/65128490/GreenPeace-Fukushima-Seafood-Results

Chernobyl too, but this is IGNORED by today’s science: http://tekknorg.wordpress.​com/2011/03/16/fukushima-c​hernobyl-unofficial-data/ Dr. Chris Busby Believes Fukushima Was A Nuclear Explosion :http://www.rense.com/gener​al93/chrisbsy.htm AND: University of Innsbruck says Chernobyl was primarily caused by a NUCLEAR EXPLOSION – Page 1, left: translation: “… the one Nuclear explosion, and finally a meltdown followed by “: http://physik.uibk.ac.at/p​hysik4/tschernobyl/2-Der_U​nfall.pdf AND: “Some specialists are sure that after the steam explosion a nuclear explosion similar to an atomic bomb explosion occurred in the core of the 4th Unit . Its power had to be much higher than power of the steam explosion. The conclusion of the authors is based on experimental findings established by studying of activities of isotopes 133Xe and 133Xem in the air that existed in the first days after the Chernobyl accident. Their study was carried out in the city Cherepovets that is about 1,000 km in north direction from the Chernobyl NPP. The authors could find that the ratio of activities of these isotopes is the same as in the case of nuclear explosion.” SOURCE: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.​jp/NSRG/reports/kr79/kr79p​df/Malko1.pdfTO ALL: Plese help finding this: “Martinez Val, Jose M., Aragones, Jose M., Mingues, Emilio, Perlado, Jose M., Velarade, Guillermio. An Analysis of the Physical Causes of the Chernobyl Accident. Nuclear Technology. Vol. 90, June 1990, pp.371 – 378.”

Explosion yield of Chernobyl 0,2 – 0,3 KiloTons. Model of the Destruction of the Reactor in the No. 4 Unit of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant – by Kiselev, A. N. | Checherov, K. P.: http://discover-decouvrir.cisti-icist.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/dcvr/ctrl?action=shwart&aix=8&aid=2485630

Jack Harris Central Electricity Generating Board nuclear metallurgist acceptsof his colleague Ross Hesketh’s view of nuclear explosion in Chernobyl: Page7  http://www.spokesmanbooks.com/Spokesman/PDF/91Gifford.pdf More about Ross Hesketh: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/obituaries/ross-hesketh-549777.html

We shall never forget, that the atomic bomb is an invention of the NAZIS and the atomic reactor is an invention of the military: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/07/30/germanys-nuclear-research-founded-by-the-nazis/

Right now, they are working on some new kind of bible, unbelievable:  https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/05/21/the-nuclear-priesthood-a-successor-to-the-iaea/

the forcible pollution by all of us by the nuclear industry / military is irresponsible. Natural radiation is dangerous and leads to spontaneous mutations, and diseases. We can not accept such a thing as a reason to add yet more radiation because it is passed on from living creature to living creature and from generation to generation.

maybe they can destroy the democracy, make us sick. But not our courage.

With kind regards to all of you

Jan Hemmer

Please support: http://www.criirad.org

Daily, uncensored, 1st hand Fukushims news: http://fukushima-diary.com/

and the IPPNW: http://news.ippnw.de/index.php?id=64

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

In 1986 the russian atomic reactor of Chernobyl exploded. Irradiating 25% of Belarus, where 72% of the Chernobyl fallout went down. Since then a secrecy is going on, in Belarus and in inside of the U.N: http://www.tschernobylkongress.de/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/Baverstock_How_the_UN_works.pdf No significant protection programs have been taken by the Belarusian State, the aid for Chernobyl affected regions and people have even been reduced or stopped: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/06/24/nuclear-crimes-belarus-says-chernobyl-irradiated-areas-are-clean/  While Fukushima exploded, Belarus signed the contract for the construction of the first atomic power plant in Ostrovets: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/nuclear-energy-takes-you-as-hostage/

According to one of the leading Chernobyl experts (namely Nesterenko and Jablokov) Chernobyl killed up to 1000,000 people: http://books.google.de/books?id=g34tNlYOB3AC IAEA, UNSCEAR, WHO, ICRP and the belarusian / russian state deny this. This is the reason why: The WHO is gagged by the IAEA with a contract from 1959: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/page/2011/05/19/german-greens-cancel-secret-gag-agreement-between-iaea-and-w-h-o/

I accompanied a group of Chernobyl children, people from Belarus, together with many other Europeans to the United Nations in Geneva, on April 26th 2011. This single visit was video taped by me. The visit and the action of the website http://www.independentwho.info led to a change inside of the WHO. Secretary General Margaret Chan admitted on May 4th 2011, that every radiation is dangerous and that there are no safe radiation limits: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/05/12/w-h-o-secretary-general-chan-admits-for-the-first-time-in-52-years-radiation-is-always-dangerous/ It was part of our peace tour trip through Europe: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/03/13/be-part-chernobyl-peace-tour-through-europe-april-2011/

I witnessed the change in Belarus also. Exactly from the moment on, when the construcion contract of the new belarusian atomic power plant was signed (March 2011, during Fukushima explosion) Belarus stumpled into a hyperinflation. The bad economic situation created an increase of monitoring of belarusians by KGB and Police. Many belarusian friends told me, that when you go shopping, after work, doors are closed and suddelny civil police asks you for your ID. You have to tell them where you work. And even if it is your freetime they phone your work giver and ask him. Although you did nothing wrong, your work giver will have a chat with you the next day. This is senseless, criminal, but effective. Everywhere there are registration books, where people write down when you come and when you go. Even in kindergarten. The new reactor is a threat to all democratic development in Belarus. Belarus has become a hostage to Russia, because Russia’s ROSATOM is building it. Belarus got a credit of more than 2 billion Dollars by Russia, to pay the reactor. Then, three months later, got a credit by the IWF. Neither the construction nor the maintenance nor the operation nor the fuel cycle is self controlled by Belarus. It’s totally owned by Russia and it’s company ROSATOM. In Japan: TEPCO can irradiate hundreds of thousands or millions of people – it is protected by the state and even praised by the IAEA – the servant of the military and atomic industry: http://www.independentwho.info What will happen with the democracy in Japan? This is the situation in Belarus right now: http://toxaby.livejournal.com/514571.html?view=11193611

my PHOTOS:

More to come,

regards,

Life-Upgrade.com

Read Full Post »

http://www.nuclearbanks.org/

the biggest banks of the world are the biggest money givers of the atomic industry – along with the military.

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

regards,

Life-Upgrade.com

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

Iran’s Bushehr reactor is connected to the power grid: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-14779227

Israel und US plan attack: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-15595657

On June 23rd President Obama declared his plan for withdrawal of US forces from Afghanistan. And later, also from Iraq.

http://edition.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/06/23/afghanistan.troops.drawdown/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

Because a US led atomic attack against Iran will cause fallout, which will also affect Afghanistan and Iraq.

Projected Casualties Among U.S. Military Personnel and Civilian Populations from the Use of Nuclear Weapons Against Hard and Deeply Buried Targets:

http://www.ippnw-students.org/iran/RNEP_Report_Final.pdf

The IPPNW (peace nobel prize 1985) says, that

  • six B61-11 earth-penetrating atomic weapons with a yield of 340 kt each will be dropped according to HPAC / Pentagon scenario
  • dropped on: Isfahan and Natnaz (Iran)
  • Result: In 48 hours -> 2,6 million deaths, fallout on India, Pakistan, Afghanistan (evacuation of the troops?), 10,5 million people injured.

At the same time Iran is trying to run it’s atomic reactors (build by russian company ROSATOM – builds now in Belarus, most Chernobyl affected country) – which are offline since the outbreak of the computervirus Stuxnet:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/16/world/middleeast/16stuxnet.html

If the atomic reactors are running and producing Plutonium, Iran fulfills these conditions:

  • 1st, the 2002 Nuclear Posture Review
  • 2nd, the National Security Strategies of 2002
  • 3rd, the 2006 National Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction

These 3 papers will be used as a reason to start a war.

Plus: The atomic facilities of Iran are underground. Which makes them invulnerable against conventional attacks.

1981 – Israelian conventional airstrike against ABOVEGROUND Iraq atomic reactor Osirak: http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/june/7/newsid_3014000/3014623.stm

2007 – Israelian conventional airstrike against ABOVEGROUND Syrian atomic reactor: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/14/washington/14weapons.html

So, the HPAC program used by the US Pentagon recommends the use of six B-61 atomic weapons agains Iran – each digging 7 meters deep and then explode.

B 61 atomic bomb: http://books.google.de/books?id=YgAAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA78&lpg=PA78&dq=pentagon+less+fallout+b-61&source=bl&ots=kYo5w2KxVZ&sig=M2UcN_1fIzSsdPkB-y2Nx8wEIGQ&hl=de&ei=csAxTr2XMYbesgaamYjpBg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CCAQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false

A civil atomic program – supported by the IAEA – is the base for a military atomic program. If this military atomic program violates the proliferation: A war is inevitable. So, the IAEA plays a key role in Preparing Wars.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9409

US forces pull back is an evacuation:

https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2010/04/01/us-forces-pull-back-is-an-evacuation/

Medical consequences of a nuclear attack against Iran:

https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/05/29/medical-consequences-of-a-nuclear-attack-against-iran/

How Nuclear Energy takes YOU as HOSTAGE:

https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/nuclear-energy-takes-you-as-hostage/

regards,

Life-Upgrade.com

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »