Posts Tagged ‘reactor’


Geneva, Aprl 26th 2016, infront of the World Health Organisation. Signs and action during the hippocratic vigil: http://www.independentwho.org

it is recognized by the World Health Organization that the International Atomic Energy Agency has the primary responsibility for encouraging, assisting and coordinating research and development and practical application of atomic energy for peaceful uses throughout the world without prejudice to the right of the World Health Organization to concern itself with promoting, developing, assisting and coordinating international health work, including research, in all its aspects.http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/Others/inf20.shtml#note_c

qualifying five year survival as “cure”, only considering cancer” – World Health Organisation; http://mondediplo.com/2008/04/14who

2012 IAEA annual budget:  € 331 million – enough to buy the United Nations.

How the UN works: “know thine enemy” or at least who it is:

“By mid 1998 first draft of the Guidelines was circulating between IAEA and WHO at the management level.

“Although there had been a clear agreement between the two organisations at
the management level and the work had taken place openly the IAEA withdrew
at that stage strongly advising that the whole issue should either be dropped or
revised. The issue was the proposal to lower the action level for implementation
from 100mGy to 10mGy dose to the thyroid’s of children.”

“Managerial level of IAEA refuses to endorse the report and refuses to endorse the report but WHO publishes Guidelines in 1999 but IAEA describes them as “DRAFT” and WHO Geneva agrees”

SOURCE: Dr. Keith Baverstock


From: “Le Monde diplomatique, March 14th 2008, by Alison Katz):

– The Protocols of the UN Chernobyl Conference in 1995 were never made public.

Until 2008, By 2008, W.H.O. spokesman Gregory Haertl claimed the opposite – this is his contact data:

Gregory Härtl
Team Leader, Communications for Global Alert and Response (GAR)
World Health Organization

Only summaries of the protocols have been published, 12 of a few hundreds.

Every study, every statement or action by the WHO, if in connection with radioactivity and health, must be authorized by the IAEA

– The IAEA has no mandate for this. The IAEA has no mandate for reactor safety or human health.

– The IAEA is not contracted by the UN to organize relief efforts for nuclear accidents.

– 1991: Rather than examine genetic defects due to Chernobyl, the WHO examined Caries in the Chernobyl affected countries

– Behind the IAEA is the military-industrial complex

The IAEA is the spokesman of the five permanent members of the U.N.: China, USA, France, England, Russia – all atomic weapons countries. All with VETOs infront of the U.N. Vetos against all Chernobyl studies.


The UN General Assembly adopted the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court on July 17, 1998. On July 1, 2002 the statute came into force. “The International Criminal Court is a permanent tribunal to prosecute individuals for genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes.” (Wikipedia, 03/25/2011) Thus far, the ICC has not accepted criminal or civil cases involving the destruction of natural resources and environmental terrorism. The establishment of its authority to do so is long overdue.
In relation to the ongoing accident at Fukushima, responsible officials from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the World Health Organization (WHO), the operating company (TEPCO) and Japanese nuclear power regulators should be brought before the International Criminal Court and held accountable for their actions.
Failure to aid in tens of thousands of cases and threats to natural resources hundreds of thousands if not millions of people is a Felony.
The behavior of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the World Health Organization (WHO) following the reactor accident of Fukushima is a scandal. WHO has made public statements trivializing the emergency and ceding all of its responsibilities to the IAEA, citing the treaty of 1957. “What is WHO’s role in nuclear emergencies? Answer by WHO: “Within the United Nations system, the IAEA is the lead agency for coordination of international response to radiation events.” (World Health Organization, Japan Nuclear Concerns, FAQ, 14 March 2011, Geneva)
The IAEA – an organization whose Board of Governors is dominated by and comprised almost entirely of nuclear industry members, holds fast to its opinion that Fukushima should be assessed at Level 5 on the International Rating scale for significant events in nuclear facilities (INES).
The quantity of radioactive Iodine-131 released is a central indicator for the evaluation of nuclear accidents on the INES scale. The release of more than “a few 10 ^ 16 Bq of iodine 131” is classified as a level 7 catastrophic accident this (INES) scale.
Apparently, the IAEA, TEPCO and the Japanese government officials in charge have not clearly stated how much radioactive material has been released throughout the unfolding of the Fukushima disaster. According to estimates by the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO), comprised of 60 monitoring stations world-wide under the auspices of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, the first three days of the Fukushima accident alone released about 3.8 x 10 ^ 17 Bq of radioactive Iodine-131. That is about 100 times the official inventory. The Fukushima disaster has also released significant amounts of several other radionuclides which have not even been measured.
Due to these figures, the Fukushima accident would have been legitimately classified as INES level 7 a long time ago. Greenpeace is now in the process of conducting its own analysis.
The behavior of WHO and the IAEA is therefore an unprecedented scandal. An inappropriately small evacuation zone is estimated to have resulted in the needless exposure of pregnant women, children, and other adults to excessive levels of radiation and radioactive contamination beyond 250mSv, the limit set for the recognition of work related cancer among Japanese nuclear power plant employees. Radiation biology assumes that if 10,000 people were exposed to a dose of 1 Sv, then 500 deaths are expected to occur as a result of their exposure (ICRP60) 500-1200 (BEIRV) 580-1740 (RERF), 2400 (Köhler). The ICRP – another profiteer of the atomic industry – made the recommendations for radiation protection standards, which were accepted by all countries and which were used o justify IAEA regulations. Interesting isn’t it?



This is the reason why UN sees no rise in cancer due to Fukushima: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/31/us-japan-fukushima-un-idUSBRE94U0KR20130531

The UN is divided into 7 organisations, of which two are of interest to us, the Economic and Social Council and the Security Council.The “Economic and Social Council” oversees ALL the United Nations agencies with the exception of the “IAEA”.

In fact, the IAEA is the only agency that reports directly to the “Security Council” which is made up of representatives of 15 countries, of which 5 are permanent members of the Council : the United States, the Untied Kingdom, the Russian Federation, China and France.

These 5 nations are all nuclear powers, both civil and military, and almost all are exporters of nuclear technology.
The 10 remaining members (or countries) have a mandate which lasts for 2 years.

The influence of these 5 permanent members of the Security Council on policy making within the IAEA is enormous and ongoing. With no counterbalancing power, it is almost impossible to claim that the IAEA has an objective view of the nuclear industry and the consequences of its use.

On 28th May 1959, the IAEA (not yet two years old !) and WHO signed an agreement referred to as “WHA 12-40” which, though it might, on paper, appear balanced and reciprocal, in practice, puts WHO in a subordinate position to the IAEA.

From this day on all information policy by the media, the ministeries, the universites and commissions is directly affected by that. We’ve seen it happening with Chernobyl and in Japan.

Presently the international organizations (WHO, IAEA) recognize as the main cause of increase of thyroid cancer in liquidators and children population after the accident their irradiation with radioactive iodine, I-131. The rest of diseases, they suppose, are provoked by psycho-emotional reactions..” (!!!…RADIOPHOBIA…!!!) There is no linear dose effect correlation, but “The bimodal dependence of effects on dose was revealed for all studied parameters. Namely, effects increased at low doses, reached maximum (for low doses), then decreased (in some cases the effect sign reversed) and thereafter increased with the increase of dosage”: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Burlakova.pdf

From our 2011 visit at the U.N. in Geneva, Q & A with World Health Organisation:

Read Full Post »

not until 2016, at the earliest, will we know the full number of those likely to develop serious medical conditions.” former Secretary-General Kofi Annan http://www.un.org/ha/chernobyl/docs/sgsm7778.htm


Yury Bandazhevsky said that Chernobyl began and is not over: http://www.king5.com/news/nation-now/exiled-scientist-chernobyl-is-not-finished-it-has-only-just-begun/138546166targe

this is the inside of central hall of Chernobyl reactor 4. Below is the 2,000 tons lid, which was blown aside. still there today. Below the lid is the (empty) reactor vault.vzryv_na_chetvertom_bloke



In this article you will learn things never heard before. They sound absurd, crazy. But these things have official sources. Partly even of the nuclear industry itself.

You, reader deserve the truth. I think you are someone who believes the following, as do 99 % of all people: Chernobyl 4 exploded 1986. It was a meltdown. It irradiated parts of Europe and the World. You probably know that a new sarcophagus is being built right now in Ukraine. A Shell as big as the statue of liberty above and around the ruin. Liquidators were there, connstructing the first sarcophagus in 1986. You probably believe people died, how many you don’t know. And now it’s 30 years since then.That’s what you know, what you believe.

Are you ready? For one of the biggest lies in human history, along with the lies of TEPCO Japan. And IAEA. And UNSCEAR.

All say: Meltdown. A meltdown is a theoretical assumption. It helps to keep evacuation and compensation small. Because Meltdown means: Only 2 – 5 percent of the radioactive inventory / the core, escaped the reactor. It is a theory. It helps the industry to survive.

Here are facts with Sources next to them / below.

  1. The core of almost all reactors worldwide consists of Uranium Oxide (UO²). Chernobyl was a double core, seperated hydrauligcally. Making this thing 190 tons heavy. This data is from NRC. It says, each Kg consisted of 2 % Unraium 235 enrichment – which can be used for bombs. Reactors use it to become critical, or to operate – in other words. Did you know that? For example each german reactor is a so called MOX reactor. The number of MOX reactors worldwide increase. Sometimes they are fed with weapons plutonium. But this is only wishy washy. They consume it to become critical. But each reactor produces 250 kg Plutonium per year and unit, worldwide. If plutonium enriched or Uranium 235 enriched. Ok, so there were 450 Kg Plutonium in Chernobyl – from the beginning there were 450 kg Uranium 235. Do you know how much Plutonium was used for Nagasaki and how much Uranium 235 was used for Hiroshima? Answer: 64 Kg Uranium 235 for Hiroshima and 6,2 Kg Plutonium for Nagasaki. Your average reactor contains a lot of bombs in its core, Chernobyl even 100% more. It contains the radioactivity of 1,000 Hiroshima bombs, or 15 billion curie (Source: NIRS). Its “only” enriched, but reactors are nothing else than decelerated nuclear bombs.

Sources: http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML0716/ML071690245.pdf and: http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/Artikel%20zu%20Tschernobyl%20in%20Nuclear%20Technology%20Vol%2090.pdf



2. The plutonium isotopes in different reactor types (Chernobyl is RBMK):




3. Let’s make a shortcut: What happened at Cherobyl 4?

I quote in all points this study, published by Nuclear Technology paper, in 1990: http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/Artikel%20zu%20Tschernobyl%20in%20Nuclear%20Technology%20Vol%2090.pdf

The Chernobyl Core was 190 tons of Uranium Oxide UO².

Each Kg consisted of 2,4 g of Uranium 235. To make the reactor work. This is the situation in each reactor worldwide. To get it run, beginning of life fuel needs this. After a certain period there is Plutonium in the reactor. For Chernobyl it makes 450 Kg Pu239 all together in both halves of the Core.

Ca. 250 Kg Pu239 in normal reactors. With smaller cores. The core was split in two halves, together 10 m length. An electromechanical experiment was started.

Purpose: Could a tripped generator maintain the electrical feed to the main circulation pumps during generator coast down?

Reactivity was reduced.

Security System was blocked, so was the >automatic< scram.

Both turbo generators were shut down.

The behaviour of Chernobyl is similiar to Fast Breeder Reactors (Sodium / lead cooled), also in terms of void coefficient.

The loss of pumping power induced by the experiment caused a rapid fail in pressure, so the water began to boil, at the bottom of the reactor and even at the inlet of the water! The reactor was unstable.

The crew pushed the button of the Emergency Protection System:

The water lies between the moderator (graphite) and the fuel. It captures thermal neutrons. It is more like a neutron shield than an additional moderator. The energy once stored in the fuel was transferred to the coolant.

It continued to boil and saturate and steam and water met very hot surfaces:

So the first explosion occurred and set the reactor dry – this can be described as steam / hydrogen explosion, BUT that was not was the reactor destroyed. Not, what the reactor lid has thrown aside, not what destroyed the reactor hall.

The first explosion had an energy of 200 Gigajoules. All water was expelled from the reactor. All fuel channels became dry. And Water was pushed back into the inlet and the steam drum seperators.

A DRY reactor heats up 100°C (180°F) evey 0,1 seconds! At the same time nuclear reactions take place, NEUTRONS – just below the speed of light. No chance for Reactor Emergency Systems:



A dry reactor heats up 100°C every 0,1 seconds.

The Doppler Effect was saturated. Phase transition was faster than the heating. NO MELTDOWN.

You would need “only” 50 Gigajoules to boil all that water.

Xenon build up. The reactor poisoned itself. But that was not the main cause for the next events:

The Void Coefficient increased. More than 5 $. This is higher than the total antireactivity of the Doppler effect.

A final supercritical state was achieved – This is nothing else than a nuclear Explosion / reaction of the Reactor Type. This principle is known since the first graphite gas cooled reactors were build.



NRC official: http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML0716/ML071690245.pdf 

Fuel Disaggregation requires very high energy: More than 250 Gigajoules.

The crew pushed the Scram Button AZ5. Control rods moved it. They needed 10 seconds, which took much too long. Only a small number of them reached the core.


2 seconds later the Nuclear Explosion / Reaction occurred. This one was 1,000 Gigajoules = 1 Terrajoule. This is the equivalent of 200 – 300 Tons of TNT, or just the yield of a U.S. nuclear W54 warhead.


This nuclear warhead existed and was actually tested. It`s yield: 250 Tons TNT, or, in other words: 1,12 Terrajoule. Exactly the amount of Energy Chernobyl`s two explosions had (one setting the core dry, the other destroying it):

LINK of the 250 tons (0,25 kilotons TNT) Warhead: http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/m-26.html

The U.S. NUREG-1250 report, the official U.S. analyses says in Figure 4.3: 1,400 calories energy were deposited into each gram of reactor fuel UO². That is exactly the 1 Terrajoule: http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML0716/ML071690245.pdf

The fuel was damaged. Each explosion took 1 second.

It included Shock Waves, Cladding rupture, Fuel fragmentation, Phase transition, and as an eye witness said, a blue flash.

The fuel can become vaporized (official NRC data):





If 65 % of the fuel is smeared that means the reactor is prompt supercritical = Nuclear explosion / reaction. This is called bigger than 1 $.

The total power of the reactor at the time of its destruction was 47,000 % over normal.

This all happened in 1 second.

Fast neutron reactions happen 1,000 times faster than any chemical or physical reaction.

A steam explosion was not possible anymore. At high temperatures steam ionizes into hydrogen and oxygen. Both do not explode at temperatures above 2,000 / 2,100°C:

Reaching 4,000 – 5,000°C these temperatures were no longer chemical, they were nuclear. Officials tell us: “Chernobyl was a hydrogen / steam explosion” – maybe the first one. But with the heating up, it became too hot for these kind of explosions. Don Arnott (below) said: At these temperatures steam ionizes and dissociates into the gases oxygen and hydrogen. These detonating gases do not explode above 2,000 / 2,100 °C.



The phase transition Uranium Oxide core flew like a turbo jet engine into the air, ca. 20 – 30 m above the central hall and exploded in a nuclear explosion of the reactor type. The temperatures reached at this moment: 40,000°C.


But the Temperature of the Chernobyl nuclear explosion was 100,000 times lower (10,000,000%) than the nuclear explosion of the bomb type.


“Two different models of the nuclear explosions are known. According to, the core of the Chernobyl reactor transformed to a turbo-jet solid-phase engine after a very short initial overheating of fuel. It flied like a missile from the reactor vault to the central reactor hall by the hydrodynamic forces of gas-phase streams flushing down from the fuel channels. Then it exploded as an atomic bomb in the spaceof the central hall.” source: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr79/kr79pdf/Malko1.pdfchernobyl-nuclear-explosion34

No water has enough thermal conductivity for that.

This exceeds every safety system human can design and build.

The not welded lid has a weight of 2,000 tons. It was superheated during the explosion and neutron activity. It was seen from the helicopter crew and IAEA as well as soviet officials misinterpreted it as fuel in melting process. Steel glows cherry red at Temperatures 770°C to 800°C and yellow at Temperatures 1,150°C to 1,250°C.

The paint is also still there. It survive a max. Temp. of 300°C.

The thermal observation showed no melting process and no graphite fire.




IAEA says 96% of the fuel is still in the reactor. But it is not.

In September 1986 126 tons of graphite and 26 tons of fuel were removed from roofs at Chernobyl plant site.

If much Boron is used in western reactors, similar over moderated situations can happen.

Western reactors avoid explosions, via cooking and steaming the reactor cores and letting the aerolized inventory fly through the safety relief valves (SRVs). It`s like a pressure cooker.

NUREG 1250 also speaks of “aerolized” fuel particles after phase transition, on page 6-7.

The industry simply avoids the term “nuclear explosion in a reactor” and simply calls it: “prompt critical excursion.” That`s all.




“an average operating nuclear power reactor will have approximately 16 billion curies in its reactor core. This is the equivalent long-lived radioactivity of at least 1,000 Hiroshima bombs.” http://www.nirs.org/factsheets/routineradioactivereleases.htm


Vladimir M. Chernousenko, Scientific Director of the Ukrainian Academy of Sciences  Institute of Physics in Kiev’s Task Force for the  Rectification of the Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident- HE SAID:

“Radiation emission was no less that 80% of the core (with a total of 192 tons), which amounted to 6.4 x 10^9 Ci (Ci = Curie = 37,000,000,000 becquerel) If we divide the figure by the population of the whole earth (4.6 x 10^9 people) then we get 1 Ci per person.”


“15m³ of radioactive substances emitted from Block 4 at this time could be diluted in 15 x 5 x 10,000,000,000,000 km³ if water, In 100 years 15,000 km³ would be needed. In 1,000 years 15 km³ would be the required amount. For comparsion: the total outflow of the world`s rivers is 36,380 km³.” Dilution is just another word for retransmission. More radiation for everyone.


The Temperature reached more than 2,000°C degrees – reaching 47,000 % POWER!


A steam explosion can not develop 1,2 Terrajoule. Steam explosion’s Maxium -> 50 Gigajoules. But the explosion lifted the 2,000 tons lid away, and then even destroyed the reactor hall! How powerful is that. Only a maximum of 10 to 50 Gigajoule of Energy are possible by a Steam explosion in Chernobyl – it was the water expelled from Reactor 4:


Source: http://books.google.de/books?id=vgwAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA65#v=onepage&q&f=false

Other sources say: H. van Dam. says: “900 Gigajoules”: http://iopscience.iop.org/0034-4885/55/11/003



image from: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/seminar/IS/Imanaka20120627.pdf



Yes: 1,400 Cal/gm (calories per gram) are 1,1 Terrajoules = equivalent of 0,2 – 0,3 Kilotons TNT.

There was not enough water, power in water, to create so a high energy explosion, for the 2nd one. This was nuclear.

W54 nuclear warhead is the energy yield equivalent of Chernobyl explosion (0,2 – 0,3 KT TNT):

NRC: http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML0716/ML071690245.pdf 


Footage from the inside of Reactor 4:

There is this interview with a scientist who was with russian Checherov in reactor 4:

“And that he (Checherov) has worked in the the lower part of the reactor for five hours. He said there were only is 10 tons. Otherwise they would have been so dead as a doornail. When we were in there, that was an uneasy feeling for me. The sound of the instruments, no light, you had to watch where you step and climb and you never knew whether or not chunk falls down from above. There are a thousand different rooms accessible in these ruins, heavily damaged. At the bottom of the reactor pot: We climbed over it broken things. At some areas there were even these elephants ‘feet’ of  molten material. Checherov has shown us all.” – “In the reactor pot was nothing. It was all thrown out with tremendous force into a short and violent explosion, which was so strong that it has lifted the 2,000-ton concrete lid. So the energy source is nuclear energy, clearly and the explosion was a nuclear explosion! The Western world – where  nuclear power plants and nuclear weapons are completely different – wants to ignore it, because otherwise it would clarify that a nuclear power plant can destroy itself with a nuclear explosion. But in the textbook, is written that a nuclear power plant can not. But it can.”

“Checherow and I went inside the destroyed reactor in Unit 4, as he is there crowled everywhere, even on the bottom of the reactor – accompanied by a small film crew.” – “I want now speak about the second Sarcophagus, because it does not serve to disguise a dangerous ruin, but for the concealment of dangerous lies. Since there are a lot of inconsistencies. Worldwide, for example, the version that 95 percent of the nuclear fuel still in there – is accepted, and that it would pose a threat for Ukraine and for the whole of Western Europe. Checherov has refuted this claim and he clearly says less than 10 percent are still in there. He was commissioned in 2001 by the Kurchatov Institute, to do a research report related to the second Sarcophagus. He has investigated room by room, measured, photographed, take core samples and has made his research report. He got a high distinction for it and the report ended up in a drawer forever! It interferes with the business.” Source: http://www.taz.de/!82695/

Here they can be seen: Walking around the empty reactor:



AN Kiselev, Chernobyl, 1986, block 3: “Power of gamma radiation from a channel, lying on the roof of the third block measured by Zherdev was 2 Sievert per Hour (the limit of the measuring range of the instrument DP-5V ) at a distance of three meters” / “we had to work in an environment where radiation levels could exceed the 10 Sievert per Hour and even higher” / “As soon as the rotary drill bit to the fuel clusters, fuel chips along with the water got into the room , and immediately dramatically increased gamma-ray background” / “Biological protection of the camera has been redesigned in accordance with the requirements of radiation safety.” / “On the tube sites were about 15-20 tons of fuel. On the roof lay the whole fuel assemblies. Approximate weight of 300-350 kg each. The rate per person was calculated by removing 50 kg of graphite or 10-15 kg pieces of fuel rod.” / “the total amount of fuel in the lava-like clusters is within 20 % of the entire nuclear fuel that the reactor had at the time of the accident.”

“Checherov analyzed all the reports and minutes of the Integrated expedition with measurements and calculations. The analysis estimated the amount of fuel made on the basis of thermal measurements showed that this estimate was based on assumptions that do not reflect the real picture of the thermal situation in unit 4, and secondly, were based on experiments that are not based on reliable measurements, and voluntarist declarations of expenditure thermal parameters experimentally recorded variations of which varies in the range of up to two orders of magnitude.” / “The maximum thickness of the fuel accumulation , measured on the spot and recorded on the film is 0.5 meters , and if you increase the thickness of the layer 8 times, then this cluster should have a thickness of 4 meters.” / “At the time of the accident in the reactor core were 1,659 fuel channels withg 190,257 kilograms of uranium or its kg Uranium Oxide (UO2).”

“where, how much and in what state the nuclear fuel ?” / “Our reports of fuel found in the Unit 4 was several times smaller, but the debate as to why such differences exist and where the truth is – was not gebated in this symposium” / “regardless of the fact that the reactor vault is empty and you can not see this amount of fuel and the amount of such fuel just could not fit in the observed areas, those who were there and personally saw it with their own eyes the empty space – you can not convince the others that there are not huge amount of fuel as declared by those who have not been there ” / ” it turns out that the minimum found fuel is 53 % of the fuel, and if we accept the second version, you still have to find the 91%!http://www.souzchernobyl.org/?section=31&id=563


We are fooled by IAEA and soviet agencies since 1986!

b) What you see here in this video is NOT the fuel melting, because it was thrown completely out by a force of 1,2 terrajule (0,2 – 0,3 KT TNT)  and it is NOT graphite fire, there was none according to a heat photo scanner Checherov used shortly after the explosions. What you see  is the 2,000 tons reactor lid, that was thrown aside and is GLOWING because of HEAT, it was so hot, that it turned from Red (770 – 800°C) into Yellow (1150 – 1250°C). The helicopter crew did not survive. Interivew with above Infos: Constantine Checherov – Senior Researcher of the Kurchatov Institute – one of the first people who visited the reactor hall after the explosion. He does not believe that the explosion of Chernobyl in ’86 exploded was hydrogen. It was a nuclear
explosion scattered hundreds of tons of radioactive fuel around the station: http://www.novayagazeta.ru/society/6095.html


Info from Interview with Checherov: http://www.novayagazeta.ru/society/6095.html


4. So, why a new sarcophagus? Chernobyl as you have read released so much radioactivity as a whole nuclear war. This is where it went down:




Chernobyl irradiated the whole European Continent – even pro nuclear UNSCEAR clearly admits that (although their numbers are from the textbook). http://www.unscear.org/docs/JfigXI.pdf


To understand the principle of the nuclear explosion of the reactor, and unmask probably the biggest lie in technological history of human history, just have a look at this:

– Chernobyl was a nuclear explosion

No containment can keep such a explosion

– The weight of the reactor lid was 2,000 tons (NOT 1,000!) – important for energy calculation later below

– A containment would increase the yield of the explosion (pressure!)

– This principle is as old as the principle of man made nuclear fission:

From the book “History of the British nuclear industry” by Margaret Gowing, “Britain and Atomic Energy”, on page 382 the former  U.S. water-cooled graphite reactor at Hanford is described: “To be built in view of the risks of an accident, the reactor is at an isolated location. Because water absorbs neutrons, and when the water flow is interrupted and the control rods do not occur immediately in action, the water evaporates in the cooling system and can no longer absorb the neutrons . These neutrons were therefore available to increase the fission rate in the reactor, which is super critical with power. The temperature rises, the fuel evaporated and the radioactivity is spreading widely. “

On page 385 we find the position:
“The gas cooling is to avoid the risk of severe supercritical state …”





What is supercritical?

The knowledge of the danger of an atomic explosion that can occur in a water-cooled graphite-gas reactor, is as old as the principle of the reactor itself.

Safety Assessment Principle 152 requires ‘The containment should adequately contain such radioactive matter as may be released into it as a result of any fault in the reactor.’ Clearly if nuclear explosions are possible a licence should not be granted. LAST PAGE: http://www.spokesmanbooks.com/Spokesman/PDF/91Gifford.pdf

The number of fissions and the energy released quickly escalate, and if the process is unchecked, the result is a violent explosion. Reactions that multiply in this fashion are called chain reactions.” Quote from: http://wps.prenhall.com/wps/media/objects/3313/3392670/blb2107.html

The critical mass in a reactor (even on a pro nucler site): “After pushing the AZ-5 button the emergency protection system added, according to calculations, about a ß of positive reactivity and created a local critical mass in the lower part of the core – resulting in a sharp increase of power there (see Figure 3) and the coming into play of the positive power coefficient of reactivity. The power in the lower part of the core rose to the level at which the fuel exploded and got dispersed.” quote Anatoly Dyatlov, former deputy engineer for operations at Chernobyl: http://www.neimagazine.com/features/featurehow-it-was-an-operator-s-perspective/

Chernobyl was build by ROSATOM – the ones who build a new reactor in Chernobyl irradiated Belarus, the ones who helped Iran with their nuclear reactors, and probably delievered Polonium 210 to kill Litvenenko in London.

The new sarcophagus is built to contain this dangerous truth. The truth that Chernobyl was emptied by a nuclear explosion (of the reactor type, not bomb type).

Who finances this new project? The “nuclear” bank:

Who supervises it? Former IAEA General Secretary Hans Blix. He said in 1986 in Le Monde: “A yearly Chernobyl is acceptable for the world…”

Chernobyl needs no sarcophagus, not today and not in 1986, because it was and is EMPTY. The establishment of a sarcophagus was crazy, senseless and deadly – But right now, they build the 2nd one. A new Containment for a dangerous truth.

The liquidators have not liquidated Chernobyl. The liquidators have liquidated themselves.

800,000 worked in the area. On site, as doctors, workers… but they worked in the Chernobyl Core – which was scattered everywhere. In microparticles. This means: Soviet officials evacuated 130,000 civilans, but sent 800,000 into the irradiated areas!

Valery Legasov probably knew. BUT:

“Valery A. Legasov” – who was the first russian official who spoke about Chernobyl to the IAEA in 1986, and committed suicide. Before his death he made an audiotape, with untold facts about the Chernobyl explosion. Here are the abstracts of his tapes: “About the accident at Chernobyl” by Academician VA Legasov (text from the 4 cassettes) – in russian: http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/Legasov_V._Ob_Avarii_Na_Chernobiylsk.pdf

His 5 hours long speech at the IAEA 1996 meeting about Chernobyl was ignored: http://books.google.de/books?id=S-SsDtZG5WgC&pg=PA51&dq=new+scientist+valery+legasov&hl=de&ei=Lx_MTuu-BMaEOqb9uKYP&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CDMQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false

He knew about the insanity of sending liquidators to Chernobyl – he could not convince the IAEA and soviet officials. And decades later, Checherov – also from the same institute, indrectly supported the Legasov.



Some say a quake caused the Chernobyl catastrophe. But is the quake maybe the result of the  explosion – expressed as seismic data? Here is the seismis data from 1986, by soviet sources: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr139/pdf/karpan.pdf






Again the summary, from 1996 IPPNW PSR papers, Vienna:







by peace researcher NZ:


This is the NECK SHOT for the nuclear industry. But we failed, because we were blinded by the Meltdown Lie. And we are again blinded by TEPCO and IAEA. They have three empty reactors in Fukushima. They have no evidence where the fuel is. But call it Meltdown.

30 years dear readers. One human generation. One irradiated earth.

Often officials as former soviet Agencies, IAEA, NRC, UNSCEAR, tell the lie of a “hydrogen” or “steam” explosion. That is a lie. It comes from the textbook. Because otherwise reactors would get no licence to be built. They have to keep their inventory inside at all cost. The nuclear textbook is a template and experts push reality through it. The Officials lie about the temperature, or the weight of the reactor lid, or any other data, at least one of them. To downplay the nature of the explosion. But the reactor hall is no more. A fact. Plus the 2,000 tons reactor lid.

50 million Chernobyl curies? IAEA? “The pro-nuclear Time magazine reported in 1989 that perhaps “one billion or more” curies were released, rather than the 50 to 80 million estimated by Russian authorities.” Source: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/Chernobyl/Chernobyl@10p2.html

All radiation maps, doses, emissions are from the text book – not from reality. 50 million curie are: 1,850,000,000,000,000,000 Becquerel (1.85e+18) released by CHERNOBYL. A lie!

There is nearly NOTHING left in the Chernobyl 4 reactor! This is proven! 

Argonne National Laboratory in Illinois: 9 Billion Curie

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California: 4,5 Billion Curie

Source: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb6393/is_n3_v12/ai_n28692892/

1,85 1,85 1,85 1,85 1,85 1,85… Just remember this number ONE point EIGHT FIVE and the 50

let’s look at the Boiling Water Manual from GE, also for Fukushima:

page 73:


and page 76:


Each reactor releases 50 micro curie of radioactive gases: which is 1,850,000 becquerel PER SECOND!

There is the 50 and the 1,85 again!

It’s all from the textbook!

It’s not the reality!

Can you control atoms?

>>>> A normal reactor releases 1,850,000 becquerel per second. Multiply it with x 10 = 18,500,000 becquerel – these are also the offical MAXIMUM LEVELS of radionuclide activity in the exclusion Chernobyl zone in Belarus (from the 1995 Belarus NATIONAL Report):

Again the 1,85 !

daily dose at a 1000 Curie per km² area, for example near Chernobyl reactor 4 with 37 mio becquerel per m² (map) is something like 10 mSv PER DAY – while normal is 1 – 2 mSv per year


They press reality into their simulation models. Especially Chernobyl. The 50 Mio Curie are used to conceal the fact, that ALL Inventory was thrown out in 1986, thats more than 5 billion curie, not 50 million. But they use the textbook to conceal it, in order to prove that even during an explosion a reactor safe. And now these madmen build a 2nd sarcophagus around and EMPTY reactor, to even underline the 30 years old lie!

More than a million people died because of Chernobyl:

n contrast (by Alexey Jablokov, co-author of the 1000,000 Chernobyl Deaths-Study: http://www.strahlentelex.de/Yablokov%20Chernobyl%20book.pdf ):

The UNSCEAR Committee for the Scientific Investigation of the effects of radiation United Nations has declared:

The UNCEAR committee has decided not to extrapolate the effects of Low-level radiation from the Chernobyl accident on the population on the basis of models extrapolate absolute terms, because these predictions are afflicted with unacceptable unreliability (UNSCEAR, 2011; 98, p.18).

This “unreliability” depends on both the methodological errors of the officially recognized system for the determination of radiation risk (eg: ECRR, 2003, 2010), as well as with the underestimation of the extent of the effects of the atomic bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined (eg: Bertell, 1985, Stewart, 1989)

One of the methodological error of traditional approaches to determining the scope of Radiation risk is the exclusive use of data on cancer mortality, although it is not the most important cause of mortality after the Chernobyl accident, in radioactively contaminated territories. Another methodological error of UNSСEAR approach is a complete disregard of the Increase in perinatal mortality rate after the disaster that after the Chernobyl Accident in the many highly radioactively contaminated areas in Belarus (Petrova et al. 1997, Korblein, 2002, 2006), Ukraine (Dzykovich et al., 2004), Russia (Balewa, et al., 2001), Germany (Schreb, Incited, 2000, Korblein, Kuchenkoff, 1997, Schreb et al., 2000), Poland (Korblein, 2003, 2006) and UK (Bentham, 1999, Busby, 1995) showed. Since the time of the nuclear weapons tests in the atmosphere is known that the radioactive Contamination, an increase of prenatal mortality rate (stillbirths and Miscarriages) and infant mortality rate (Sternglass, 1972; White, 1992;. Playford et al, 1992; Overview here Busby, 1995; Yablokov, 2002, Durakovic, 2003) causes.

My part: Infant Mortality Changes Following the Three Mile Island Accident,” from 1980: http://atomichistory.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/sternglass_infantmortalitytmi.pdf quote “The discrepancy in infant deaths between the two sources for the period of April 1 through June 30, 1979, had been two; from October 1 through December 31 it had also been two. For eighty-eight to surface between July 1 and September 30, precisely in the controversial summer months after the TMI accident, seemed unlikely.”

My part: Quote: “The victims of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and patients treated with X-rays because of such dubious indications as thymus hyperplasia demonstrate the exceptionally high sensitivity of children. However, the important discovery of Stewart and coworkers in 1958 , an enhancement of childhood leukaemia following diagnostic X-ray pictures during pregnancy, listed as historic milestone by Mossman also, has provoked a deep controversy. Their findings were an impressive support of the postulated linear non-threshold relationship for leukaemia” SOURCE Page 2: http://www.staff.uni-marburg.de/~kunih/all-doc/doserele.pdf

In the period 1987-88 is a well-documented increase in infant mortality in the leaves radioactive contaminated areas of Ukraine (Grodzinsky, 1999; Omelianetz, Klementjew, 2001, Dubowaja, 2010), Russia (Fetisow, 1999; Hworostenko, 1999; Komogortseva, 2001, Utka et al. 2005, ZYB et al., 2006) and Germany (Korblein, 2006 notice) was found. After the Chernobyl Accident increased infant mortality affects even the entire demographic Statistics of a number of countries. In the more contaminated areas of Ukraine and Russia an increased Overall mortality observed. (The most recent 1995;. Omelianets et al, 2001; Оmelianets, Klement’ev, 2001, Grodzinsky, 1999;. Golubchikov et al, 2002, Kaschirina, 2005; Sergeeva et al. 2005; Dubowaja, 2010, Kaschirina, 2005; Sergeewa et al, 2005;. Fetisow, 1999; Sukalska et al.
2004 and many others).

The methodological error of the epidemiological approach to determining the number of victims is based on the accounts of the radiation risk is that the estimation of the number of victims on the comparison of relatively well-documented mortality and morbidity rates (the number the sick and the dead carried out), while levels of radioactive Load can not be accurately determined. Moreover, this approach to determine the Number of victims is not capable of the effects of low radiation dose precisely to record (which have added even the inventor of this approach): “The currently available Epidemiological data provide no basis for reasonable assurance to the radioactive contamination attributable morbidity and mortality in test groups from the To predict the population of the three republics and other European countries, with a average dose of less than 30 mSv were charged in the past 20 years. Any rise in [the morbidity and mortality among these groups] would be lower than the Emerging scientific measurability. “(UNSCEAR, 2011, (97), p. 18).

The methodological Defectiveness of the epidemiological approach leads to the large deviation of forecasts the numbers of victims. (Table 1):


4,000 deaths (in 90 years. Belarus, Ukraine, European part Russia) according to IAEA / WHO – press paper Chernobyl forum 2005

8,930 deaths (in 90 years. Belarus, Ukraine, European part Russia) according to Chernobyl forum 2005

7,400 deaths (Whole world for 50 years) according to Anspaugh et al., 1988

30,000 deaths (Whole world for 50 years) according to Goldman, 1987

18,000 (8,000 – 32,000) deaths (Europe, 1986 – 2065 without Thyroid cancer) according to Cardis et al., 2006

30,000 – 60,000 deaths (Whole world. About the entire period) according to Fairley, Sumner,2006

117,000 (37,000 – 181,000) deaths (Whole world. in the period 1986 – 2056) according to Malko, 2010

317,000 – 475,000 (495,000 with Leukemia) deaths (Whole world. About the whole period. only radiocesium) according to Hofman,1994

899,000 – 1,786 000 deaths (Whole world. About the entire period. only radionuclides) according to Bertell,2006

Some estimates of the additional through by the ‘Chernobyl’ caused mortality Cancer, which made the epidemiological approach (“dose” method) were Based on the spread of the “dose” method estimates, which are set out in the table are more than 400 times higher than the usual scientific disagreement. You can with the Opinion of UNSCEAR agree that not a forecast of the number of victims work but with one caveat: This does not work only if the traditional “dose” – Method is applied.

For the estimation of the total number of victims is another method (the so-called “Balance” method) reliable. It consists of the data of the health status of Population of the radioactively contaminated areas with high data. To compare health status of the population from the “clean” areas. The basic source data consist of physical instrumental measurements of radioactive Contamination of an area and the incidence rate and mortality (morbidity and mortality) in this area.

The best example of this method is the Additional calculations on the “Chernobyl” accident declining mortality, Hudolej W. et al. (2006) in the six regions of Russia was performed. In these
Areas that were affected by the fallout from Chernobyl were the worst, 7.5 million People.

I leave the details of the bills and put aside just before the results: Total number of excess deaths in these six radioactively contaminated areas was 60 400. This corresponds to 3.75% of total mortality of the population during the examined 15 years (from 1990 to 2004.) or 37 of every 1,000 people. Conversion to at all levels of ≥ 1 Ci / km ² contaminated areas within the former Soviet Union (and taking into account the mortality of liquidators and evacuees from these areas after 1986) could all of the additional mortality rate in Ukraine, Belarus and in the European part of Russia in the period 1990-2004 by the Chernobyl accident was caused, amounted to around 240 000 cases.

In Europe, outside the areas affected by radioactive releases from the Ukraine, Belarus and the European part of Russia could be the additional “Chernobyl” – Mortality in areas with a level of contamination Cesium137> 1.08 Ci / km ² (> 40 kBq / m) in the period 1990 to 2004 a number of 185 000 cases, represent, and in the areas with a higher population density and a contamination level of

To this figure should be even mortality within the first 3.5 years after the Disaster (May 1986 – 1989) and add the period 2006-2011. If it is suspected that the annual death rate for the first 3.5 years of the 1990-2004 period at about corresponded to (the infant mortality rate is higher, while the mortality of adults lower), adds even further 240 000 cases. If one assumes that the Mortality rate during 2005-2010 was about half (on the one hand, the population older and “collected” diseases are clear and the latent period of several Cancer is over, on the other hand, the level of chronic radiation decreases due to the decay of cesium-137 and strontium-90), there are again additional 170 000 cases.

In this way, the overall level of additional “Chernobyl” in the mortality rate Period of the first 25 years are estimated by the disaster: 1 034 000 + 240 000 + 170 000 = 1.444 million victims. But this figure also shows the entire “Chernobyl” mortality is not complete. It is known that the disaster to a sudden increase in prenatal mortality has done. The increase in the number of still-births and miscarriages can be divided into a number highly radioactively contaminated areas in Ukraine, Belarus and Russia to determine (Kulakov et al, 1993;. Buzhievskaya et al, 1995; Buldakov et al, 1996;. Golovko, Ishewski, 1996; Medvedeva et al, 2001; Lypik, 2004;. Serdjulk et al, 2004; Timchenko et al, 2006;. ZYB et al. 2006) (. Scherb et al, 2000; Scherb, Wiegel, 2010) as well as the phenomenon is in Bavaria, Croatia (Korblein, 2008), UK (Bentham, 1991, Busby 1995), Finland (Auvinen et al, 2001.) Italy (Semisa, 1988) and Norway (Ulstain et al., 1990) measurable. The calculation of the total Number of such cases is not entirely accurate, but might, according to the experts’ assessments about 170 000 cases estimated for whole Europe.

If we agree with the opinion of the nuclear society, in the UNSCEAR (2001) is expressed, and thus give up the tests, the exact number of victims of To predict the Chernobyl disaster, because we seem to inaccurate estimates, then comes the one thought prohibition. The other approach is to consider all arguments and vague estimates to clarify gradually. With regard to the scale of the disaster, the whole territory of
northern hemisphere and thus affected more than one billion people and has concerns, it clear that it is impossible to exactly the number of victims up to thousands or tens of thousands of people determine. But it seems important to determine the magnitude of the numbers: Some thousands (Which is unnoticeable in the overall mortality rate) or a few million (which is a Forcing a rethink in terms of nuclear technology would).

The “balance” – method for determining the number of victims of the Chernobyl accident, which during the last years has developed rapidly and is still evolving, it looks advantageous- Especially in comparison with that used with the calculation of the radiation risk “Dose” method, which is based on unreliable estimates of radiation dose. The “Balance” – method is not ideal because it is the formation of average values of
demographic characteristics and an assessment of the radiation rate in the observed Areas needed. The undoubted advantage of the “Balance” method when compared with the “dose” Method, however, is that it makes no less verifiable assumptions. In the analysis of the mortality situation in the Chernobyl radionuclides on by one level of ≥ 1 Ci / km ² (40 kBq / m) contaminated areas in Russia, Belarus and Ukraine has been found that the overall mortality rate here is around 4% higher than in the relatively “clean” neighboring areas. In the other, huge sections of the northern Hemisphere, which were affected by the Chernobyl fallout is weaker, the number of additional Low mortality, no doubt, but given the large amount of people affected they certainly still essential. The rough estimation of the total possible number of Chernobyl victims in the period of the last 25 years is about 1.44 million cases (under Consideration of prenatal deaths – 1.6 million cases). This confirms the known Statement: The Chernobyl accident is the biggest technological catastrophe in Human history.


Dr. Rosalie Bertell, “People died at Three Mile Island / Killing Our Own”: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/KillingOurOwn/KOO14.htm

written by Dr. Bertell also: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/Chernobyl/CaUFtH.html

and: http://exacteditions.theecologist.org/read/ecologist/vol-29-no-7-november-1999-5368/29/2/

Chernobyl: The Accident and it’s implications for other Nuclear Reactors

Speakers are:

> Dr. Sergij Mirnyi, Engineer, Physico-Chemist, Liquidator (http://www.mirnyi.arwis.com/)

> Prof. Vesily Nesterenko, Physicist, founder BELRAD institute, liquidator (http://www.belrad-institute.org/)

> Commander Robert Green, former Royal navy (http://hildamurrell.org/)

> Prof. Yuli Andreev, Physicist, liquidator (http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/15/us-japan-nuclear-chernobyl-idUSTRE72E5MV20110315)

> Dr. Wolfgang Kromp, Physicist, Nuclear advisor to Austrian Federal Chancellor (http://www10.antenna.nl/wise/index.html?http://www10.antenna.nl/wise/459/4556.html)


Chernobyl and the Human Rights of the Victims (ALARA, ICRP, IAEA):

Reactors – build by nuclear military-industrial complex
Dose Limits – invented by nuclear military-industrial complex
Compensation rules – designed by nuclear military-industrial complex


Speakers are:

Dr. Irina Grushevaya, Foundation for The Children of Chernobyl, Minsk (https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/11/11/belarusian-fund-for-the-children-of-chernobyl-gets-european-award/)

Dr. Yuri Pankratz, Foundation for The Children of Chernobyl, Minsk (http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/17737-1)

Prof. Galina Drozdova, Russian People’s Friendship University, Moscow (http://www.friends-partners.org/oldfriends/welling/drozdova.html)

Prof. Larisa Skuratovskaya, Institute of General Pathology and Pathopsychology, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow (http://www.imow.org/community/directory/user/index?id=18306)

Prof. Peter Welsh, Member of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna (http://chernobyl.iatp.by/n1/Koerb_en.htm)

Prof. Hari Sharma, Nuclear Chemistry, University of Waterloo, Canada, International Medical Commission on Chernobyl (http://iicph.org/du_update_1_3)


Chernobyl: Evidence of Genetic or Teratogenic Damage to Environment and Humans:

Speakers are:

Ms. Cornelia Hesse-Hornegger, scientific illustrator specialising in Zoology (http://www.wissenskunst.ch/uk/aktuelles/contemporary/)

Ms. Solange Fernex, former Member of the European Parliament (http://www.nuclear-free.com/english/fernex.htm)

Dr. Sanghamitra Gadekar, International Medical Commission on Chernobyl (http://www.ptne.org/depositions/Surendra%20Gadekar.pdf)


Chernobyl “compressed several thousand years of evolution into a decade” – New York Times 1996 http://www.nytimes.com/1996/05/07/science/chernobyl-s-voles-live-but-mutations-surge.html

Fukushima’s Butterflies – known since 1927: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/08/17/fukushimas-butterflies-known-since-1927/

Insects and their fast mutagenic “reaction” on low radiation are some kind of early warning system for us humans: Irradiated Insects in Japan: http://www.freeml.com/bl/8694840/25149/

normal insects soon only in the laboratory: http://www.wissenskunst.ch/en/tschernobyl.htm

Great book about mutagentic impact on insects worldwide: http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/3908247314/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=thtefi-21&linkCode=as2&camp=1634&creative=6738&creativeASIN=3908247314

Reduced abundance of insects and spiders linked to radiation at Chernobyl: http://cricket.biol.sc.edu/chernobyl/papers/moller-mousseau-biol-letters-09.pdf please have a look at this beautiful book

in english: http://radionucleide.free.fr/Stresseurs/fulltext_punaise.pdf

and in german: http://www.sensigns.ch/db/daten/dokumente/Heteroptera_Deutsch.pdf

MOVIE: Chernobyl Children: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lvNR8VtVJpU

MOVIE: Adi Roche, Chernobyl Children: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YUA4Bvfu9w

Chernobyl Data: Dr. A.Okeanov: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/09/25/chernobyl-data-dr-a-okeanov-ministery-of-health-belarus-morbidity-rate-among-children-and-teens/

Chernobyl: Development failures in the NEWBORN: http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/Lazyuk-ChernobylBelarus.pdf  According to Michel Fernex (former WHO, Switzerland) The IAEA said in 1996: “Because there was no register in Belarus for malformations BEFORE Chernobyl, there are no abnormalities.” A LIE, not logic, unethic and unsicentific.

Results of Long-term Genetic Monitoring of Animal Populations Chronically
Irradiated in the Radiocontaminated Areas http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Goncharova.pdf

Health State of Belarusian Children Suffering from the Chernobyl Accident: Sixteen Years after the Catastrophe: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr79/kr79pdf/Arynchyn.pdf

Incidence of Obligatory Registered Malformations in Belarus for 1982 to 1995 (per 1000 neonates) PAGE 3: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Lazjuk.pdf


The UN is divided into 7 organisations, of which two are of interest to us, the Economic and Social Council and the Security Council.The “Economic and Social Council” oversees ALL the United Nations agencies with the exception of the “IAEA”.

In fact, the IAEA is the only agency that reports directly to the “Security Council” which is made up of representatives of 15 countries, of which 5 are permanent members of the Council : the United States, the Untied Kingdom, the Russian Federation, China and France.

These 5 nations are all nuclear powers, both civil and military, and almost all are exporters of nuclear technology.
The 10 remaining members (or countries) have a mandate which lasts for 2 years.

The influence of these 5 permanent members of the Security Council on policy making within the IAEA is enormous and ongoing. With no counterbalancing power, it is almost impossible to claim that the IAEA has an objective view of the nuclear industry and the consequences of its use.

On 28th May 1959, the IAEA (not yet two years old !) and WHO signed an agreement referred to as “WHA 12-40” which, though it might, on paper, appear balanced and reciprocal, in practice, puts WHO in a subordinate position to the IAEA.

From this day on all information policy by the media, the ministeries, the universites and commissions is directly affected by that. We’ve seen it happening with Chernobyl and in Japan.

“…the IAEA will endeavour to organize conferences, seminars and workshops, in cooperation with the University, with the aim of enhancing public awareness of radiological effects on human health and addressing the issue of “radiation fear” and post-traumatic stress disorders in the Fukushima population…”


Direct Damage To People attributable to Chernobyl

Speakers are:

Prof. Elena Burlakova, Semenov Institute of Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow (http://archive.nbuv.gov.ua/portal/chem_biol/chemistry/2010_2/14.pdf)

Prof. Yvetta Kogarko, Semenov Institute of Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow (http://books.google.de/books?id=9aVUTgKDNYEC&pg=PA323&lpg=PA323)

Prof. Irina Pelevina, Semenov Institute of Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow

Prof. Ludmilla Kryzhanovskaya, Chief of the Department, Kiev Institute of Social and Forensic Psychiatry (http://medical-diss.com/medicina/mediko-sotsialnye-osnovy-zabolevaemosti-invalidnosti-i-sovershenstvovanie-sistemy-sotsialnoy-zaschity-invalidov-vsledstvi)

Prof. Leonid Titov, Director of the Belarusian Research Institute for Epidemiology, Immunology and Microbiology, Minsk (http://nasb.gov.by/eng/members/correspondents/titov.php)

Prof. Nika Gres, Research Institute of Radiation Medicine, Minsk (http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr79/kr79pdf/Arynchyn.pdf)

Prof. Jay Gould, President of the Radiation and Public Health Project, New York (USA) (http://www.radiation.org/reading/ and http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/19/nyregion/19gould.html?_r=0)

Prof. Inge Schmitz-Feuerhake, Institute for Medical Physics, University of Bremen, Germany (http://www.chernobylcongress.org/speakers/artikel/228ec3fb555cefc5a28d030951e8f385/prof-dr-rer-nat-inge-schmitz-feu-1.html)

Dr. Andreas Nidecker, Medical Radiologist, Past-President of IPPNW Switzerland, International Medical Commission on Chernobyl, Basel (https://www.facebook.com/andreas.nidecker)

Prof. Sushima Acquilla, Epidemiological Department, University of Newscastle-on-Tyne, UK (http://www.fph.org.uk/working_abroad)

Click to Enlarge:


The BIMODAL effect of low radiation on health – proven by Burlakova 1996, ignored by science and IAEA, today’s science ONLY looks for LINEAR dose effects. They use the model of HIGH radiation (acute syndrome) on LOW radiation effects (cancer, diseases, mutation – …) – result: ALL radiation victims are and latency in general ignored! Please share: http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/BurlakovaChernobyl-Belarus.pdf

The IAEA is unscientific and unethic. They ignore the bimodal effect of low radiation.

“Presently the international organizations (WHO, IAEA) recognize as the main cause of increase of thyroid cancer in liquidators and children population after the accident their irradiation with radioactive iodine, I-131. The rest of diseases, they suppose, are provoked by psycho-emotional reactions..” (!!!…RADIOPHOBIA…!!!) There is no linear dose effect correlation, but “The bimodal dependence of effects on dose was revealed for all studied parameters. Namely, effects increased at low doses, reached maximum (for low doses), then decreased (in some cases the effect sign reversed) and thereafter increased with the increase of dosage”: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Burlakova.pdf IGNORED BY IAEA, UNSCEAR, ICRP, WHO

NUCLEAR WITNESSES, INSIDERS SPEAK OUT: DR. ERNEST J. STERNGLASS, PHYSICIST  http://www.ratical.org/radiation/inetSeries/nwEJS.html


Prof. Gould explains How Radiation Kills Infants

Click to Enlarge:

In the late 70s, there were in Wisconsin / USA seven nuclear power plants without incident. The mortality of infants of lower weight (less than 2500 grams) was examined: If the officially published emission rates of the nuclear power plants increased from year to year (Source: Government of the United States), also the mortality of underweight babies was increased. http://books.google.de/books?id=Rdgo5cXrO94C&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q=Small%20babies%20die%20near%20nuclear%20plants&f=false

“According to the ICRP in 1991, just 5 mSv to the testes could cause damage to offspring – yet this dose was permitted yearly to members of the public, and ten times more was permitted to nuclear workers, in all countries prior to 1990. It continues today to be permitted yearly for nuclear workers in most countries.” http://iicph.org/victims_of_the_nuclear_age

“Possible scale of lost or impaired children after Chernobyl in all of Europe and the part of Asia coveredMissing Children: 2,5 Million.” PAGE 34 http://www.ratical.org/radiation/Chernobyl/RIGEinEuroandCNPPc.pdf

“Children receive the highest doses, because the dose coefficients, in a 3 year old child, are 5 times higher than in adults.“ Vassily Nesterenko: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/children-radiation-maps-2/

“the human infant while nursing may attain higher body bur dens of radiocesium than would be the case for somewhat older children.”: http://radionucleide.free.fr/Stresseurs/419.pdf

“By mid 1998 first draft of the Guidelines was circulating between IAEA and WHO at the management level.

“Although there had been a clear agreement between the two organisations at
the management level and the work had taken place openly the IAEA withdrew
at that stage strongly advising that the whole issue should either be dropped or
revised. The issue was the proposal to lower the action level for implementation
from 100mGy to 10mGy dose to the thyroid’s of children.”

“Managerial level of IAEA refuses to endorse the report and refuses to endorse the report but WHO publishes Guidelines in 1999 but IAEA describes them as “DRAFT” and WHO Geneva agrees”

SOURCE: http://www.chernobylcongress.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/Baverstock_How_the_UN_works.pdf

Congenital Malformation and Stillbirth in Germany and Europe Before and

After the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant Accident: http://www.helmholtz-muenchen.de/ibb/homepage/hagen.scherb/CongenMalfStillb_0.pdf

European stillbirth proportions before

“After Chernobyl, infant mortality rates in Sweden, Finland and Norway increased by a significant 15.8 percent compared to the trend for the period 1976 to 2006. Alfred Körblein calculated that for the period 1987 to 1992 an additional 1,209 (95% confidence interval: 875 to 1,556) infants had died.”

“From the period of atmospheric nuclear weapons testing it is known that the infant mortality parameter is sensitive to radioactivity. It therefore comes as no surprise that there are now numerous studies showing that infant mortality is not only higher in the vicinity of Chernobyl, but also further away – in Europe. In the textbooks there is nothing to be found on this yet, but it is to be found in a number of different journals.”

“n 1986 in Berlin, an unusual increase of infant mortality was observed. Compared to 1985, infant mortality in Berlin rose in 1986 from 10.6 to12.5 per 1,000 live births in the first year of life. The mortality rate of non-German infants increased over-proportionally from 9.6 auf 14.3 per thousand. The mortality rate even increased between the end of the first week and the end of the first year of life by 26 percent. There had previously been a decrease in infant mortality”

“Ever since discovering the mutagenicity of ionising radiation in animal experiments, damaging radiation genetic effects in humans have also been repeatedly considered and examined. The ICRP, however, is of the opinion that teratogenic damage (stillbirths, infant mortality, severe malformation) does not occur below a dose of 100 mSV. Since the mean dose for Germany in 1986-7 was only 0.2 mSV, according to ICRP opinion there can’t have been an increase in teratogenic damage. On the other hand, there are numerous studies from Germany, Europe and the three countries in the Chernobyl region that show that there was indeed an increase in teratogenic damage, contrary to expectations on the part of these scientists.”

Source: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/Chernobyl/HEofC25yrsAC.html

“Energy mix and a weapon strategy inseparably involve human consequences in terms of increased incidence of leukaemia, other cancers, neonatal and infant mortality, mental retardation, congenital malformations, genetic diseases and general health problems.” Source: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/inetSeries/RB89.html

Alfred Koerblein: Fukushima & Chernobyl: http://www.alfred-koerblein.de/indexengl.htm

SOURCE: http://www.chernobylcongress.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/nyagu.pdf

Stochastic effects and children:
There is statistical health damage caused by the so-called low-level radiation (above ZERO up to 500mSv.) That is not assigned to any particular people, but occur in a defined population. This issue is the subject of thousands of studies all over the world since the Chernobyl nuclear disaster, and I will discuss in detail below with reference to examples. Factors such as age, gender, health, immune system, nutrition, social situation and the duration of exposure of the radioactivity influence the onset of cancer and other diseases. Until the Chernobyl disaster, the biological effects in the body of the
radioactive isotopes have been undervalued.

It is now clear: Any radiation poses a risk especially for children who are extremely radiosensitive.

1) A child is constantly increasing in weight and size, it grows from the intrauterine embryo to adult, the younger, the faster. Therefore, the cells divide much more frequently than an adult. Cells in the division phase (mitosis) are more vulnerable to radiation than cells in the resting phase.

2) The ability of the body to recognize “defective” cells and to  eliminate them develops during childhood. An embryo has not yet this ability. Therefore  “defective” cells can multiply unimpeded and later lead to cancer or heritable diseases.

3) A child that grows must hold more substances than emiting them, more than an adult. The body of a child takes in more radioactive substances in food, drink and air we breathe than adults. Especially dangerous are 137 and Cs-134 and 137 and Sr-90 – deposited in the muscles or in the bone (see below).

4) Children have their whole lives ahead of them. Some diseases caused by radiation take a long time to occur (latency): 20 or even 30 years. Children are more likely than older adults to reach the dubious chance to see the end of this latency. In the human body there are about 200 different cell types, each has a different function.

Basically, each cell can respond to injury with four responses:

1) The damage is so severe that the cell dies.

2) The cell can repair the damage (in children see above).

3) The cell loses its ability to produce certain substances, such as in the pancreas gland which can not produce insulin anymore (increase of diabetes in Belarus among children and adults) or other digestive juices during the growth, of the thyroid hormones.

4) The malignant cells degenerate and there is cancer.

It is now clear: Any radiation poses a risk especially for children who are extremely radiosensitive.

The effect of 4 isotopes of iodine -131, Strontium-90, Tritium (H-3) and cesium – 134 / 137 on the human body I will now show more detail, not without pointing out the most toxic isotope, plutonium (Pu-239), that triggers in micrograms cancer. It is produced in each reactor in the fission of uranium, about 250kg per year and reactor. 

“In some areas where congenital diabetes had not been seen at all before the catastrophe, there were occurrences afterward and the number of cases has increased since 1986 (Marples, 1996).” PAGE 99: http://stopnuclearpoweruk.net/sites/default/files/Yablokov%20Chernobyl%20book.pdf

“Children are more endangered than adults, because their cells divide themselves constantly. Because they grow, they need permanent energy and have to deal with the impairment of their cells. With children, ailments will start earlier, one to four years afterwards, such as in the case of Chernobyl. Adults have a latency period for Cesium of 20-25 years. It is a slow death, adults who survived 25 years become ill now. The children got sick much earlier and often died.” http://fukushima-diary.com/2011/11/slow-death/ 

translation of “slow death” by Hohlie Hohltaube: http://vogelgarten.blogspot.com/2011/10/das-leise-sterben.html

Endocrinologists from the Heinrich-Heine-University in Düsseldorf and the Belarussian endocrine advice centre in Minsk cooperated on an investigation into the development of diabetes amongst children and young adults in Belarus. Over a lengthy period, 1980 to 2002, the incidence rate (new illness accumulation per annum) of diabetes mellitus Type1 – diabetes with insulin deficiency, mainly amongst young adults – was observed in two areas of Belarus that had been contaminated to very different degrees. Data from the highly contaminated Gomel area was compared with that of the comparatively slightly contaminated area of Minsk, during the periods 1980-1986 and 1987-2002. A total of 643 patients from the Gomel area and 302 patients from the Minsk area were involved in the analysis. In the years 1980-1986 (before Chernobyl) there was no significant difference between the incidence rates in Gomel and Minsk. In contrast to this, for the years following Chernobyl (1987-2002), there was evidence of a significant difference (p<0.001) in the incidence rates of both areas. The authors also discovered that the incidence rate in the Minsk area before and after Chernobyl was not significantly different, but it was in the highly contaminated Gomel area (p<0.05), where annually about twice as many children and young adults developed diabetes mellitus Type 1 after Chernobyl, as compared to the years before Chernobyl. The highest mean incidence rate was registered in the Gomel area in 1998″ http://www.ratical.org/radiation/Chernobyl/HEofC25yrsAC.html

Radiation is not life-friendly. It is a hostile factor. Life has prevailed against this hostile factor. The natural radiation. The beta radiation of strontium has a range of 1 millimeter. No matter where it is installed, it reaches the stem cells with its beta radiation. From the stem cells, everything is made. So the stem cells are bombarded constantly. What are the symptoms? We received the following reports by the children of Chernobyl: Chernobyl AIDS. Symptoms of anemia with decreased number of red blood cells. A therapy resitant anemia.

Vitamins and iron will not help. The ongoing hemorrhage, the bleeding e.g. from the nose. Decreased number of platelets, which are indeed involved in blood clotting. The immune system of children. They are always sick, every little infection “throws them around”. They constantly have colds, infections. And low white blood cells in the blood. This is easily explained: With a Bone marrow suppression: The bone marrow – due to the constant bombardment – and especially because of the accumulation of strontium – lost the ability to compensate.

Radioactivity means selective delivery of energy. On the molecules in our body. They are tiny pinholes in the shortest possible time. But with full force. We are constantly exposed to such radiation damage each second. Every second. Permanenent.And life could not exist and the information of Life could not be passed on, if we have not developed effective repair mechanisms. But the repair mechanisms are very complex and it takes time. The shorter the life cycle of a cell, the less time remains for the repair. This explains why children with rapidly growing tissue, with rapidly dividing cells – are particularly sensitive to radiation. Mitosis.


Here I present with the permission of vice director Mr. Babenko of BELRAD, the Children radiation maps of Belarus (below). First, some background on the data: We see here 17 regions of Belarus:

Irradiated areas and relatively “CLEAN” areas. Children have Cesium in their bodies, no matter if they live in “clean” or irradiated areas. This is one important fact these maps show. Why is that? The average irradiated soil in Belarus is: 1 – 40 Curie per square kilometer (= 37,000 – 1,480,000 becquerel per m²) of radionuclides, such as Cesium 137, Strontium 90, Americium 241 and other radionuclides. It reaches also 160 Curie per km², although it is 40 on official maps, but reaches 18,500,000 becquerel per m² in some places. Here is more info: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/03/04/japanese-children-cancer-outlook-children-need-absolutely-clean-food/ Here is a list of the radionuclides: http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/Primary%20Radionuclides.gif

A brief introduction:

The Chernobyl Radiation Monitoring System in Belarus today: direct PDF link http://www.ec-sage.net/members/paper2%20V.Nesterenko.ppt (on a pro nuclear website)

BELRAD ベラルーシ 市民の放射線計測協会 – May 12th 2012

The circles on the region graphic mostly show GREEN and YELLOW. Green means: Children have 0 – 20 Becquerel of Cesium 137 per body kilogram (2,20 pounds or 35,20 ounzes). Yellow means: Children have 20 – 100 Becquerel of Cesium 137 per body kilogram.
Whole Body Counters: They give you an average of the WHOLE burden in your body of radioactive atoms (Cesium 137 for example) in Speed (Becquerel) per body Kilogram (bq/kg). BUT: It is a WHOLE and NOT a PARTIAL BODY or PARTIAL ORGAN SCANNER. There is a tiny flash each time energy is given out by the radioactive atoms in your children (in the crystals of the device). It appears below a chair in which your child sits. This flash is “translated” into / via a program / computer into Becquerel per Kg. The device is shielded with lead against background radiation. And it is NOT invasive, not dangerous for you and your child. This means: a) If you have 20 Bq / Kg Cesium 137, you can have 10 or 100 times more Cesium 137 in your heart and / or cardio vascular system, because Cesium mimics potassium. And b) a child takes in even 3 to 5 times more substances, among them of course radioactive atoms. The fast metabolism does not help, and the mitosis even accelerates the damage.

Lessons from Belarus to Japan: 555 kBq per m² (15 Curie per km²) to 1,480 kBq per m² (40 Curie per km²) cause 50 – 60 milli Sievert per year for the people living there – according to Belaraus National Report 1995 [the year when Belarus stopped aid for irradiated areas with 1 – 5 Curie km² (37 kBq per m² – 185 kBq per m²)]. Exclusion Zones start at 18,500 kBq (18,500,000!!!) per m² of Cs-137, 455 kBq per m² of Sr-90 and 150 kBq per m² of Pu-239. Very very high tolerance levels, if we take into account, that Bandashevsy proved, that 20 Bq – 50 Bq of Cs-137 per Kg of the body (not kilo Bq! normal Bq!) are already letal for children! 1995: the level of air contamination exceeded by 10 and more times the pre-accident data even for “clean” places, like Minsk.

The river sediments of Dneeper, Sozh and Pripjat, Neman, Zapadnay and Divina increased Cs-137 by 80%. This is only official state data. It reached also backwaters: The Sr-90 activity varies from 2,2 – 66,0 up to 407 – 4,215 Bq/Kg). Alpha-radionuclides density in riverbed sediments is higher than in river waters: Pu238 from 0,005 – 9,10 Bg/Kg; Pu-239-240 from 0,13 – 28,13 Bq/Kg; Am-241 from 0,07 – 16,2 Bq/Kg. In the 90ies the levels fro Cs-137 and Sr-90 exceed pre-accidental levels in ground water 20 – 30 times and in underground waters 10 times and more. Chernobyl turned the soil into a collector where accumulation and prolonged retention of long-living radionculides occur.

Today contaminated soil functions as the main source, which delivers various components of radionuclides into the biosphere. At at distance of 150 – 200 km to Chernobyl: Gomel in Belarus: 2,271 kBq/m² (61 Curie per km²) and Mogilev (146 Curie per km²) can be found. In Bragin (Gomel) Cs-137 contamination is 174 kBq per m² up to 2,523 kBq per m². Radionuclides are distributed into forest photosynthesis: this is the growth line for Cs-137: wood < branches < needles < forest litter. For the living soil cover the line is as follows: herbaceous plants < lichens < mosses. The maximum is in the root system and ground vegetative part of plants, and considerably lower in generating organs. Accumulation degree for Sr-90 in meadow plants is twice as large as compared to Cs-137. The permissible levels for mushrooms is 7,4 kBq per m² for mushrooms. Terretories are called clean if contamination density is lower than 37 kBq per m². For berries of the red worthle berries family varies from 37 to 185 kBq per m². Migration processes of marketable animals and birds cause high specific activity of game registered even on relatively clean terretories. The presence of radioactive isotopes in practically all components of the natural and natural-techno-genic ecosystems with density much higher than before explains their involvement in the geo-chemical and biological cycles of migration. This stuation causes different ways of external and internal irradiation of the population and jeopardizes people’s health. We don’t get more data today, it is covered up by the state. So we go back into the 90ies: Thyroid illnesses morbidity of the children of Gomel area in 1994 (indices per 100,000 children: Total in Belarus 1086,20 – Total in Gomel area: 3594,30 – Contaminated area (> 555 kBq per m² / > 15 Curie per km²): 16159,70. Thyroid cancer morbidity of the children of Gomel area in 1994 (i.p. 100,000 children): Total in Belarus: 3,20 – Total in Gomel area: 12,00 – Contaminated area (> 555 kBq per m² / > 15 Curie per km²): 77,50. Tumour morbidity of the children in Gomel area in 1994 (i.p. 100,000 chidren): Total in Belarus: 101,10 – Total in Gomel area: 154,90 – Contaminated area (> 555 kBq per m² / > 15 Curie per km²): 245,40. Malignant tumour morbidity of the Children of Gomel area in 1994: Total in Belarus: 13,80 – Total in Gomel area: 27,10 – Contaminated area (> 555 kBq per m² / > 15 Curie per km²): 103,30.

Impact on human health in Belarus: http://tschernobyl-initiative.welcomes-you.com/dokumente/belarus/pdf/band3_s8_23.pdf

Official radiation maps of Belarus (too low): http://www.rbic.by/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=256&Itemid=86

How Belarus makes Chernobyl zones attractive, which are irradiated with 40 Curie per km² (1,480,000 Becquerel per m² – gives 50 – 60 mSv/year only by living there): http://www.kostukovichi.mogilev-region.by/en/news/region




“Schoolchildren in contaminated areas received radiologically clean food free of charge in school canteens and spent a month in a sanatorium, in a clean environment, each year. For reasons of economy the annual sanatorium stay has been shortened, and communities in some contaminated areas have been classified as “clean”, thus ending the supply of clean food from the state. ” PDF: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/radioactivity/ChronicCs137iico.pdf Radio-Cesium helps dying. Masked by “ordinary” causes of death.

Cesium 137 and Children
Cardiac insufficiency in 18% of children with less than 5 becquerel per kg
65% in children with 11 to 26 becquerels per kg
87% in children with 74 becquerels per kg

MORE of the CHILDREN RADIATION MAPS: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/children-radiation-maps-2/

Chernobyl no longer allowed in Belarus: http://spring96.org/en/news/76869

1,000 villages suddenly clean – no longer irradiated – by official decree: http://www.nbcnews.com/id/6492342/ns/us_news-environment/t/chernobyl-neighbors-ignoring-long-term-risk#.VTfJzOHy0uc




Read Full Post »


This articile is reblogged here with the permission of the Mari Takenouchi of http://savekidsjapan.blogspot.jp

児玉龍彦氏(東大教授)と討論 投稿者 z1afa9fa75
Dr. Tatsuhiko Kodama, Tokyo University Radioisotope Center



“Meanwhile, gene studies are accurate.  Among thyroid cancer patients in Chernobyl contaminated areas, their chromosome 7q11 become three pieces, which cannot be observed among other types of thyroid cancer patients.” (11 minute)


“Epidemiology and statistics research results come only after people got victimized by radiation.  In order to protect children and pregnant women, we cannot wait for epidemiological research results.” (13 minute)

The most important thesis focusing on gene 7q11 to identify the cause of thyroid cancer


As you may already know, there are 44 thyroid cancer children in Fukushima and some of them even have matastasis in their lymph nodes.






I recently became aware that if we conduct gene test on 7q11, we can identify whether the thyroid cancer was caused by nuclear accident or not, since the 7q11 shows trisomy that cannot be observed among other kinds of thyroid patients.  This was mentioned by Dr. Tatsuhiko Kodama soon after the accident (I am blaming myself why I did not notice this most important point myself and why all the others have not pointed this out, either…)








Therefore, I asked Fukushima Medical University on the following points on September 12, 2013.


I heard that there have been Fukushima thyroid cancer children who got metastasis in their lymphs before the August 20th report by the Prefectural Health Survey team.  Has this grave fact been concealed?


According to Dr. Tatsuhiko Kodama, director of Tokyo University Radioisotope Center, if 7q11 gene is tested, it will be identifiable whether the thyroid cancer was caused by nuclear accident or not.  Has Fukushima Medical University conducted such test or any intention to conduct this test?

And I got the answer on the following day of September 13.

Answer from the Fukushima Medical University:
In case of medical service under health insurance, the information of each patient cannot be retained in the Fukushima Prefecture Health Management Center. In the hospital as well, such information cannot be provided to the third party.
As for the need to conduct gene test on 7q11, it could be argued in the Prefectural Health Management Survey team.  As for now, 7q11 gene test has not been conducted yet.

September 13, 2013


In short, even though there are metastasis among thyroid cancer kids in Fukushima, no such announcement will be made.
7q11 gene test that can identify the cause of the thyroid cancer has not been conducted!
This is such grave facts.  I also contacted some major hospitals in Japan which conduct thyroid cancer surgery, and asked whether they could conduct gene test upon the patient’s request, and their answer was “No.”
In Japan, even after the Fukushima accident, the cause of the disease cannot be identified anywhere and the metastasis of the thyroid cancer in contaminated areas are going to be kept secret!  Accordingly, the suffering of the patients and their families will be kept behind and the medical society has been and is going to ignore this most urgent social issue!
I am truly devastated to know about this reality in medical societies in Japan.


The evacuation of Fukushima children is the most pressing issue.


I really do not understand why the world organizations such as UN, etc are not making any move.
(On the contrary, I heard that the UN is now preparing a report to convince the public that there have been no health damages due to Fukushima radiation!)


Today, on twitter, I just heard that at least two kids who went through surgery in Fukushima were found to have not only thyroid cancer but also metastasis in his/her lymphs though their thyroid cancer size were reported to be small.


It is a matter of urgency to evacuate children from contaminated areas as soon as possible.

また、県立福島高校では、事故のあった年に2人の突然死が出ました。(TVユー福島 -TUFというローカルな放送局の報道局長の大森真氏が、騒ぎを鎮静化するため、なんとツイッターで一人は交通事故死であったという嘘をばらまきました。 TUFは大森氏の虚偽の発信を認めたものの、謝罪はしていません。)

In Fukushima Prefectural High School, two students died of illnesses (one was sudden death) in the year of the accident.  (However, TUF-TV You Fukushima, local TV station’s broadcasting chief Mr. Makoto Omori, tweeted a lie saying that the second student died due to traffic accident to calm down the case. TUF admitted that Mr. Omori lied on the twitter but never apologized for it.)


In this August, two students were found to have thyroid cancer out of total number of 959 students in the same school!

もうすでに、この8月には福島県の子供たちに43人もの甲状腺がんと疑いが出ていま す。まだ2次検査が済んでない子供たちの割合から計算すると、この数は100名を超すはずで、もともと100万人に1人から、数十万人に1人と言われる甲 状腺がんが、1万人にすでに3.7人の割合で出ているのです。

Already, there have been 43 thyroid cancer and suspected cases among Fukushima kids in this August.  However, considering that the large number of kids have not gone through the second exam, the number could be over 100, which is 3.7 thyroid cancer out of 10,000 although child thyroid cancer rate is usually between one in one million or several hundred thousands.


However, Fukushima Medical University and other governmental or municipality related organizations are saying they have to wait for further epidemiological data while letting children breathe in contaminated air!!!


I am a mother of an infant and this is quite unbelievable thing from an eye of an ordinary mother!

既に初期被曝をしていて甲状腺がんもその他の健康被害も出てしまった後ですが(安倍首 相がオリンピックの招致の演説で話した、「健康被害は昔も今も将来もない」というのは、事実ではありません)、さらなる被曝を少しでも防ぐために、汚染地 帯の子供は非汚染地帯に移住させるべきです。

In order to prevent further exposure to radiation, children in contaminated areas should be relocated first though they have already been exposed to initial dose and thyroid abnormality rate has been increased.  (Prime Minister Abe’s statement in front of IOC members, “There have been and will be no health damages,” is NOT TRUE.)


At the same time, we need to clarify whether the Fukushima kids cancer had been caused by radiation or not THROUGH GENE TESTS!


As a matter of fact, the director of Tokyo University Radioisotope Center, Mr. Tatsuhiko Kodama said the following.


“Epidemiology and statistics research results come only after people got victimized by radiation.  In order to protect children and pregnant women, we cannot wait for epidemiological research results.”


“Meanwhile, gene studies are accurate.  Among thyroid cancer patients in contaminated areas, their chromosome 7q11 become three pieces, which cannot be observed among other types of thyroid cancer patients.”


 というのも、細野豪志環境相が、2013年から「全ゲノム解析」を行うと昨年発表していたのです! http://fukushimavoice.blogspot.jp/2012/09/blog-post.html
Last year, the former Environment Minister Goshi Hosono announced that Total Genome Analysis would be started since 2013.
As a mother, I really cannot forgive this reality, but FUKUSHIMA CHILDREN HAVE BEEN UNDER GENOME RESEARCH ALREADY!!!

その直後、9月13日に環境省に連絡をしたところ、ゲノム検査はやっていないし、やる かどうかも決めていないという発言。しかし、この発言の真偽のほどは私にはわかりません。というのは、福島医大が、甲状腺がんの手術を急いでやりたがって いるという話を複数の情報筋から聞いているからです。

On September 13, when I asked the Ministry of Environment, they answered that they have not decided whether they were going to do genome analysis.  However, I am not sure whether this information is true or not since I heard that Fukushima Medical University tries to hurry the thyroid cancer operation without obtaining sufficient consent from the patients’ mothers (according to multiple sources)



また、米医学誌のCancer Cellに9月9日掲載された、広島大学の稲葉俊哉教授らの研究によれば、7番染色体上のSamd9L 遺伝子をマウス実験で失わせたところ、片方失わせたものについては53%、両方失わせたものについては60%の割合で2年一か月以内に白血病もしくは MDSで死んだという。Samd9L遺伝子を失うことで、異常な細胞の増殖に歯止めがかからなくなるとみられるという。

In addition according to the research paper by Hiroshima University Professor Toshiya Inaba,  mouse whose Samd9l on 7th chromosome is damaged, 53% (with 2 of them lossed) and 60% (with one of them lossed) mouse developed leukemia or MDS and died within 2 years and 1 month.  By loosing Samd9L, multiplication of abnormal cells could not be stopped.


Please do help children in Fukushima from anywhere on this planet!


See the source below for 7q11



Gain of chromosome band 7q11 in papillary thyroid carcinomas of young patients is associated with exposure to low-dose irradiation

Read Full Post »


IPPNW Congress Berlin. Feb 27th 2016.

PROGRAM: http://www.chernobylcongress.org/home/programme.html

SPEAKERS: http://www.chernobylcongress.org/home/speakers.html

After his speech about Effects of nuclear accidents on the biosphere , I asked Prof. Dr. Timothy Mousseau, Biological Sciences Department, University of South Carolina, USA, a few questions. In his speech he talked about low doses, and the zero adpative ability by birds / wild life to radiation. Which impressed me and reminded by of the Petkau Effect and works by Rosa Goncharova (both down below links). His official website: http://cricket.biol.sc.edu/Mousseau/Mousseau.html


His other studies:

There is no hormesis and no adaptive response by animals to radiation: http://www.cell.com/trends/ecology-evolution/abstract/S0169-5347%2816%2900019-7?_returnURL=http%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS0169534716000197%3Fshowall%3Dtrue

Doses were enough to reduce 50% of all birds in Chernobyl region, same in Japan: http://www.nature.com/articles/srep16594

The Tree rings date back to Chernobyl. Same things are in Japan. But the trees are younger, but will look like that: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00468-013-0891-z

Also found in mice. They can no longer SEE their natural enemies: http://www.nature.com/articles/srep19974

The research of Rosa Goncharova: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2014/01/05/the-catastrophic-genetic-consequences-of-low-doses/

Petkau Effect – Radiation: Larger effect of small doses: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/09/02/radiation-larger-effect-of-small-doses/



Read Full Post »

PROGRAM: http://www.chernobylcongress.org/home/programme.html

SPEAKERS: http://www.chernobylcongress.org/home/speakers.html


Here are the links I’ve promised to those I have given the cards:

Why is Chernobyl reactor 4 empty?


Why are the TEPCO reactors 1,2 and 3 empty?

Answer: LINK 1, LINK2, LINK 3

Thanks for reading.


Flaw 1: Critics point to the huge cost of the atomic industry. At the same time these critics are demanding more safety. But this Request for more safety means more money for the nuclear industry. Such critics are as bad as the atomic industry. They are both friends.
No matter how much money and no matter how much safety: In order for a reactor to run it must emit Radioactive atoms into our air, soil, food and bodies.The nuclear industry does not know what to do: laugh or yawn at us and our so called “criticism”. And it is running for decades. It is not possible to win this fight like that..

Flaw 2: It is always maintained that a nuclear explosion can not take place in a reactor. This is said so that we make a difference between bomb and reactor. Thus, the nuclear industry can continue to exist. That is the MAIN argument. And why the fairy tale of the meltdown was invented by them. And all the critics chatter these tales, and thus support the nuclear industry. An AtomicBOMBexplosion is not possible – BUT: a nuclear explosion of the reactor is possible and also happened. Namely, when promptly and violent supercritical state of a dry reactor generates a lot of fast neutron forming chain reactions. The temperature is 100,000 times lower than that of a nuclear BOMB explosion, but higher than any chemical temperature, and the explosive force reached “only” 250 tons of TNT In Chernobyl, but it IS POSSIBLE! Thus, the nuclear industry would have NO chance any more to exist and would be forever ended. But the critics love their meltdown lie. This goes on and on for decades, and the industry laughs and yawns at us. Although this nuclear reactor explosion scenario is known since the 1940ies.

Flaw 3: A containment is built to keep everything dangerous inside. This is a lie. First there are the venting chmineys releasing 370 bq radio iodine and 1,850,000 bq of radioactive gases per second and unit, all the time. Who controls the limits of the emissions? The operator!Then there are the Steam Relief Valves – spring loaded – are venting the radioactive atoms into the air, or going to the dry well. In case of an emergency, in western reactors the pressure is going up in the containment which can destroy the containment totally – so the operators have to vent it – the fuel – out. They melt the reactor fuel and vent it out. This is official. Such scenarios exist in the U.S. / NRC programs.


4 years BEFORE Chernobyl exploded:
In September 1982, a fuel channel in the center of the core of the Unit 1 of the Chernobyl NPP was destroyed as a result of mistakes made by the personnel. A large amount of radioactive substances was released to the industrial site of the NPP and the city Pripyat. The personnel involved in the liquidation of the consequences of this accident received high irradiation doses. / Chernobyl had it’s first accident, it went super critical during a TEST. The same situation caused the explosions in 1986. http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr79/kr79pdf/Malko1.pdf

Can a reactor go supercritical? Yes. Supercritical is the same as a nuclear explosion of the reactor type (less yield less temperature than a bomb type, mind you). If this is possible it contradicts the law, the regulations. A containment cannot contain a nuclear explosion. Nothing can. So, the containment is constructed (pressure cooker) to avoid it. It avoids it by VENTING. But this also contradicts the regulations: The containment can no longer CONTAIN the radioactive material (which is aerolized / gaseous during venting), so it is against the rules. Both ways contradict the rules. So, the officials LIE to us, by saying “Meltdown”. They always say it, when the FUEL is GONE, so we fall for the illusion it went down, instead of UP and OUT, via pipes, chimney, valves, dry-well and x vessle breach. This way the industry survives, but not DNA.

The Nuclear Explosion in a Reactor:
“The containment should adequately contain such radioactive matter as may be released into it as a result of any fault in the reactor.’ Clearly if nuclear explosions are possible a licence should not be granted.”: http://www.spokesmanbooks.com/Spokesman/PDF/91Gifford.pdf

“The number of fissions and the energy released quickly escalate, and if the process is unchecked, the result is a violent explosion. Reactions that multiply in this fashion are called chain reactions.”: http://wps.prenhall.com/wps/media/objects/3313/3392670/blb2107.html

The gas cooling is to avoid the risk of severe supercritical state …” https://tekknorg.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/mgowing-a.jpg

IAEA and UNSCEAR, as well as TEPCO and the governments have missed – in their view – the point long time ago to inform humanity about the true emission of radioactivity by TEPCO. They can not be trusted, this is vital. We must draw our own conclusions, and take care of our protection. The non dominant mutations will rise in the next generations and cause a massive die out as in most primitive times. The effects are now: Cancer, Dementia, Diabetes, Autism, and so on. This is not just a phase or phenomenon but harbinger. Normally, new mutations should be rejected with each generation, now climb the old and the new stay even. Better medical care will not alleviate the overall problem, but increase the burden on future generations..

Three Nobel Prize winners calculated the genetic damage of nuclear energy: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2015/10/14/three-nobel-prize-winners-calculated-the-genetic-damage-of-nuclear-energy/

Waiting for an “extinction event” somewhere in the future, while millions are unborn or being killed by cancer and other mutations, and these victims are undetected and dissolved between the generations, the decades, the centuries, and they are not counted, and not brought in connection with the TEPCO catastrophe. A Perfect Crime. A hostile factor was not just rised _the radiation_ no, it is a factor, that is not recognizable by our senses. Even normal equipment and techniques can not detect it. You can detonate 1,000 Hiroshima bombs or vent just ONE reactor. In terms of radioctivity it is the same = 592,000,000,000,000,000,000 becquerel. If we say “Meltdown” we ignore all written above and parrot the nuclear industry and IAEA. And punish the past, present and future victims. This time with ignorance. In the nuclear age this is to render assistance.

Fast Breeders: Pure Uranium 235 or Plutonium is used as fuel, the chain reaction can be maintained by fast neutrons. The neutrons are not slowed down by thermal velocities. Excess Neutrons are absorbed by depleted uranium surrounding the core. And so they form more and more plutonium. A Hell Machine. And not a solution.

We are surrounded by pseduo humanitarian experts.
Here’s a trick to expose anti nuclear experts as pro nuclear experts; Ask them what they think about Low Dose Radiation Damge. If they answer:
“The Risk is Small” – they are fake, uninformed, or mislead the people by strategic misinterpretation. Ignoring the Children and Fetus Mitosis, the Latency of Damage and the Long Term Genetic Effect. Usually on one hand they will stand up for radiation victims and attend prominent congresses – in order to get money and improve their reputation – on the other hand they deny any damage caused by low doses. This is going on for decades. All of them think so: IAEA, UNSCEAR, RERF, TEPCO, Health / Public Authorities, World Health Organisation, ICRP. They are the reason why the whole Nuclear Business including Nuclear Bombs can go on. Try it out, it works,

Solutions no longer exist to to solve something,
They are used to adapt us to the problems.
To merge Victims and perpetrators of industrial catastrophes.
To manipulate the brain, of mentally ill.
To deny any damage, and apply it to natural risks.
Since education is mere memorization and comparison mere history,
this project manages better with each generation.
And so none of the coming generations will understand why the diseases are growing and accept it as “normality”
There is only one allowed reality.

Lothar Loeffler (died 1983) was one of the leading racial biologists and racial hygienists under Hitler during National Socialism. Working together with those who killed disabled people and children. After the war he was a member of the Eugenics Commission USA, the Working Group on Radiological Protection of Germany and the Atomic Commission of Germany. This is _one_ reason I believe nuclear fission products are used to degenerate us within generations. In 1961 (!) this man got the
Federal Cross of Merit of Germany! Unbelievable.  https://books.google.de/books?id=LeQusx57mpkC&pg=PA79&lpg=PA79&dq=lothar+loeffler+nuclear+mutation&source=bl&ots=HQ5ck-IuJO&sig=bN0c_jkWMcXISRSMPltSFlQosGs&hl=de&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjEpN-A1N3JAhULFCwKHXs1AzYQ6AEINDAD#v=onepage&q=lothar%20loeffler%20nuclear%20mutation&f=false

Emmy Stein was one of the leading scientists doing radium research – also under Hitler during National Socialism. Radiation effects on plants – known for nearly hundred years.  https://books.google.de/books?id=gPrtE4K0WC8C&pg=PA143&lpg=PA143&dq=Antirrhinum+radium+Emmy+Stein+1922&source=bl&ots=8EDd9LgkVF&sig=SqeLMTtx98h7aD5LLc_qAtJN3nY&hl=en#v=onepage&q=Antirrhinum%20radium%20Emmy%20Stein%201922&f=false

Many people just have amputated their imagination power and reality is still greater than imagination – that scares them, so they prefer facts. And here our experts come. With their templates aka text books. Everything behaves to standards. No reason for fear.To lose fear and forgetting things is also a critical mass.

You believe in the meltdown hypthesis = You support TECPO and IAEA. You support the restart of the japanese reactors, because meltdown means reactors contain dangerous materials during accidents. Mostly. That is not the case, they use their valves and chimneys to get rid of pressure and core material.

The DNA is designed not to “forget”,
while the shell “around” It can have the illusion,
Japan’s catastrophe is TEPCO.
Europe’s catastrophe is ROSATOM.
These companies stil exist because we forget,
We are forced to. By strategical misinterpretation by so called experts.
And geneticists.

The genetic mutations are expressed at the advanced age of the individual. For us that was “aging” or “Being old”. Now there is in children: rheumatism, dementia, cancer. The previous generations had the chance of becoming old, but were already “affected”. We’re not getting older, but age faster. By genetic load. This is known to the ruling class since at least 60 years (two generations). But no geneticist loses a word about this expiration date of huge parts of the human race.

In the eyes of those in power, there can be nothing better than hatred, suspicion and false focus, among the to be dominated people. They become a simple controllable mass. They call for retaliation and military spending can rise.

How do you decontaminate something that is smaller than any decontamination process, something of which this very decontamination process consists: atoms / energy. How to decontaminate forms of energy, releasing parts of itself, no matter what you do? How to decontaminate natural laws? How to stop time and space from being?

Reality is something you press into a template and you can color it the way you want. Standardized radiation maps, and evac zones, means continuing the nuke business and saving money.

It is hard to track down all health effects of radiation, because it can cause everything bad we know.






Read Full Post »


This articile is reblogged here with the permission of the Mari Takenouchi of http://savekidsjapan.blogspot.jp

2014 Sep 2014年9月追記

TV Asahi director who covered thyroid cancer in Fukushima (maybe he was the only one in mainstream media in Japan) died suddenly and the police reported that he committed a suicide.  However, strangely, this case has not been reported by any media at all.

It is not known worldwide, but in Japan, there have been mysterious deaths related to nuclear industry in the past…for example…



TEPCO female office worker murder case. The suspect was proven to be innocent and the DNA of the true murderer was found from the victim.  However, the police is not looking for this true murderer…  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Yasuko_Watanabe

And there is another one which has even medical record proof, which is called, Monju (Fast Breeder Reactor) Nishimura Case.


Monju Nishimura Case explained by Mari Takenouchi

Summary of Monju Nishimura Case

Mr. Shigeo Nishimura died at age 49


(Allegedly committed a suicide, but homicide higly suspected for his medical records and X-ray photoes)

2014年「反原発嫌がらせ展」にて、来場者の一人が、当時、西村さんの担当した海渡 雄一弁護士に、原発関連の事件は、明らかな殺人や不審死であっても自殺にされる。当時、刑事裁判にできなかったのかと問うと、海渡弁護士の顔から笑みが消 え、厳しい表情で頷き、時間きれで話しを切った。

Mr. Yuichi Kaido, the lawyer for this case didn’t make it as a criminarl case over the homicide though there are abundant of proofs including medical records and X-ray photoes.  He has’t given any clear answer why he didn’t fight over the “homicide” at the court…


Mrs. Toshiko Nishimura carrying her late husband photo

1995年もんじゅ事故が起き、ビデオ隠しがあり、マスコミが追跡中にもんじゅ事故調 査担当の西村成生(49歳)が自殺と見せかけ殺されました。私はご遺族にも直接話を聞き、医療カルテやX線写真、遺体の写真を直接見せてもらいました。8 階からの飛び降りの遺体ではなく複数の法医学者が他殺と断定

In 1995, Monju sodium leak and explosion accident occured and Donen Co., was accused of concealing the videotapes of the accident site.  During the media fuss, the Monju accident investigation team leader, Mr. Shigeo Nishimura (49) was suspected to have killed under the disguise of suicide.  I myself visited Mrs. Nishimura’s house and saw the medical records and X-ray photoes.  According to Mrs. Nishimura, multiple number of forensic doctors judged that Mr. Nishimura was killed by somebody, not killed himself.



X-ray photo of Mr. Nishimura after jumping off from the 8th floor

No fractures on his skull, neck, or sholders were seen contrary to the newspaper report.


Trace of white air intrusion is observed in the brain stem and chest muschles.  These show that there was some progress of time before he died after he got injury, and thus he didn’t kill himself instanteneously by jumping off from the 8th floor.

The reported time of his death did not much with his deep body temperature, which implies that he had not been to the hotel where he committed suicide.  There was no signature of him on the hotel registration card either.

The handwriting of the numbers at the bottom of his suicide note was different from the ones of Mr. Nishimura.  His suicide note criticized the fuss made by the media and media companies refrained from reporting on Monju accident then after.

Strangely, the board director of Donen changed the contents of Mr. Nishimura’s suicide note.


Most of all, when Mrs. Nishimura wrote an article accusing Donen as a potential suspect of Mr. Nishimura’s death in 2005 on a monthly magazine, Shincho 45, there was not a single counterargument from Donen.

”私の夫は「動燃」に殺された!「もんじゅ事故」の暗部を追った9年間 西村トシ子
Cover of “Shincho 45” March 2005 with 2nd line from bottom saying,
“My Husband was Killed by Donen!  9 years of Quest for Darkside of Monju Accident”

そして不思議なことに、もんじゅ西村裁判では、西村さん側の弁護士さんが、なぜかこの一番大事な、「自殺なのか・他殺なのか」という争点を抜かしていらっしゃるのです。以下は、海渡雄一弁護士によるもんじゅ西村事件のブログです。http://www.news-pj.net/npj/2007/dounen-20071020.html …

Quite strangely, in Monju Nishimura Case, the attorney Mr. Yuichi Kaido had not mentioned the argument, “Was it suicide or homicide?”  Here is the blog of Mr. Yuichi Kaido who was on the side of the plaintiff Mrs. Toshiko Nishimura http://www.news-pj.net/npj/2007/dounen-20071020.html …


I really cannot under stand this point, since “homicide” is quite obvious from Mr. Nishimura’s medical record and X-ray photoes.



米のフォーリンポリシー紙にて、世界の100人に選ばれ、産経新聞が掲載しています。http://eritokyo.jp/independent/aoyama-fnp11155…html …

Mr. Yuichi Kaido is a famous anti-nuke lawyer who is also the partner of Ms. Mizuho Fukushima, the leader of Social Democratic Party.

Mr. Kaido is a board member of Citizens Nuclear Information Center and currently fighting as a lawyer for Fukushima Indictment Lawsuit.

Both of them were chosen as the World 100 people in the US magazine, “Foreign Policy” and the news was carried in New York Times and Sankei Newspaper (right winged newspaper in Japan).http://eritokyo.jp/independent/aoyama-fnp11155…html …


Attorney Yuichi Kaido and SDP Leader Mizuho Fukushima, chosen as the World 100 in the magazine “Foreign Policy” (photo of NewYork Times article)



When Mrs. Nishimura began suspecting a homicide of her husband, she went to see Mr. Baku Nishio, the Co-director of Citizens’ Nuclear Information Center (CNIC, Japan’s biggest anti-nuke organization) for consultation.  However, Mr. Nishio’s reply was, “We cannot deal with this kind of information.”

(But Mr. Yuichi Kaido is a board member of CNIC and in the end, “Mr. Nishimura’s homicide” was ignored in the trial.)






西村トシ子さんへのインタビュー By 竹野内真理

Interview with Toshiko Nishimura   by Mari Takenouchi

* 注:この取材メモを見せたら、NHKディレクターの林勝彦氏が、「こんな国家の根幹にかかわるような事件を俺が番組にするわけないだろう」と私に捨て台詞 を吐いたのでした。この林氏は、その前まで原発についての番組を作るから、いくつも企画を見せてみなさいと言い、私から情報を集め何もしてくれませんでし た。後から林氏が、NHK従軍慰安婦問題番組改ざんの裁判でも被告であったことを知りました。

Note: When I showed my following script, NHK director Katsuhiko Hayashi disregarded it saying, “I would never make any program on such an issue which could topple the very foundation of the nation.”  Before showing this, Mr. Hayashi asked me to write several plans for anti-nuke TV programs so that he would help making them, which was a lie and he only intended to gather information from me.

As for this story, please see below.→

Save Kids Japan: X) マスコミの大罪:NHKと読売新聞 Sins of Japanese Media http://savekidsjapan.blogspot.com/2013/01/x-sins-of-japanese-media.html?spref=tw

N:西村 Toshiko Nishimura
M:私  Mari Takenouchi


M: What do you mean by the involvement of the police?


N: The police announced falsified news.  The Metropolitan Police Department has its own press club, and other people cannot enter it without any exception.  Even TV people cannot get in.  Of course, the police is deeply involved in this case.  Everybody gets information from the police, so we cannot do anything once we get ousted from the press club.  It is so frustrating that we should manage to do things only in our scope of actions.


I went to see the site number of times.  There were some mysterious points. First the body was not the which fell from the 8th floor.  My husband head or body didn’t have any rupture.  Rather, he seemed to have been swallen from being battered and killed.  I went to the MPD to ask this point, but the police said that it was undoubtedly jump-off suicide.

N: 現場の写真は警察も取らなかった。救急車で運ばれる前に行っているのに。警察で取っている写真は担架に載って、現場の駐車場で道路の手前でうつぶせになり 背広を着ているものだけ。固まっている体だった。異常な状態。気をつけした状態で真下を見ていた。普通は横を向けたりするのが、固まっているから首も横も 向けられないような完全に硬直している写真だった。それで、警察に「これはなんなの?」とたずねた。

N: The police even didn’t take photoes of the site.  The police went to the site before the ambulance came.  The only photo the police took was in the parking lot where my husband was lying on the stretch with his face down in his suit.  His body looked hard and strange (considering he had jumped off from the 8th floor), because he lay with his face down and his arms straight on each side of his body.  Usually, they lay a dead body with his face sideways, but the body on the photo seemed to be so hard that nobody could turn his neck.  So I asked the police, “What is this?”


M: It doesn’t seem to be a person’s body who jumped off from the building.

N:飛 び降りた人なら、落ちたところを写真を撮っているはず。たくさん取っているはずが、一枚だけしか見せてもらっていない。背広の後ろとズボンにカキザキが 入っていた。上から飛び降りてそんなのありっこない。素人が見てもおかしい。靴も、はいたままか、とんでもないところにないとおかしい。それが担架の左右 にあった。おかしい。

N: If he really jumped off, a number of photoes should have been taken on the spot where he fell down.  But I saw only one.  He also had ripped trouser bottom.  I don’t think there could be ripps on such a place if he fell of the building  I am a layman but it really looked strange.  The shoes should have been on his foot or been scattered apart.  But in stead, they were on both side of the stretcher.  It really looked funny.


M: Were there any strange reaction from the police?

N:こちらから名刺を渡し、立会人も連れて行った。3回 目に言った時に、調書を見せてくれた。まずは本庁に言ったが、受け付けられず、後日警視庁の中央署にアポを取っていった。まず名刺を出したが、刑事課長は 名刺渡せないという。課長代理の広瀬さんは名刺をくれた。主に課長代理が説明したが、課長ははそばに居て、時々説明に加わる。写真の時に課長が説明しよう とした。カキザキを聞いたら、筋肉が膨張して破れたのだという。冬物のウールが破れるものかなあと。説得力ないな、隠しているものがあるなと思った。

N: I visited the police with an observer and gave my business card.  When I visited the third time, the police showed me the investigation note.  To see this investigation note, I went to the headquarter of MPD, but I was rejected, so I made an appointment with the MPD central station to see them on another day.  There, I gave my business card to a leutenant chief but he said he could not give his business card to me.  In stead, the acting leutenant chief Mr. Hirose gave me a card.  The acting chief was giving main explanation and the chief joined once in a while.  On looking at the photo, the leutenant chief tried to explan the reason of the rips.  He said that Mr. Nishimura’s muscle was swallen so that the throuser bottom was ripped.  I was thinking to myself, “Could it be possible to have ripps on the winter wool trousers?  The leutenant chief was not quite convincing.  He may be hiding something.”


N: It is quite strange that the photo was the only one.  The police didn’t let me see other photos, and I could not be convinced by them.  I even guessed that the police could have carried him on the stretcher from somewhere else.

N:レントゲン写真は5月 の始めにレントゲンの写真入手することで来た。それまで一年は警察か動燃かに行っていたがなかった。聖路加国際病院で持っているとは気づいてなかった。先 生(医者)に電話したら、なぜもっと早く電話しなかったかと言われた。もしかしたら何かあるのかしらと思った。一週間以内に会った。そしたら、いろいろ話 してくれた。「聖路加に運ばれた時は亡くなって十時間たっていた」と言われた。そうだとしたら、ホテルなんて泊まってない。記者会見のときが十時間前でし たから。

N: I was able to obtain the X-ray photo in the beginning of May.  Until then, about a year or so, the photo had not retained the X-ray photo in the police or in Donen, but they didn’t show that to me.

I was not aware that the X-ray photo was retained in St. Luke’s International Hospital.  As I got aware of that, I called the doctor to make an appointment, he told me, “why didn’t you call me earlier?” So I thought to myself, “Maybe there is something about my husband death.” I met the doctor within a week.

The doctor told me various things. “When Mr. Nishimura was carried into the hospital, he had been dead for 10 hours.”  If that was the case, he could not have stayed at the hotel!  Because 10 hour prior was the time of his press conference.


N: I thought that was so strange.  At the time of incident, there were so many people from Donen, and he could not make his way.


M: The doctor could have contacted you (Mrs. Nishimura) from his side.  What about this 10 hour prior death?

N:深 部体温と遺体の写真。写真が一番わかりやすい。書類にも書いてあるが写真がわかりやすい。レントゲンも取った。レントゲン写真も渡したいと言われた。一週 間以内に取りに来て欲しいと言われた。一週間以内に取りに行ったら、新聞などで言われた頭蓋骨骨折や胸がばらばらというのは違った。私が見た遺体は全然き れいだった。外で見たら頭蓋骨に骨折なし。法医学教室に行って見てもらいもした。レントゲン専門技師も呼んで説明してもらう。頭蓋骨は骨折していないと。 慈恵医大の人だった。

N: The photo of deep temperature and the photoes show.  Photoes  in the medical report show most clear evidene.  X-ray was taken, too. The doctor told me that he wanted to pass me the photoes.  He asked me to take the photoes within a week.  When I visited him to receive the X-ray photoes, they didn’t show any fractures of skull or chest parts which were reported on the newspaper.  The X-ray I saw had no injuries.  I didn’t see any fractures on the skull. I took the X-ray photoes to forensic doctor.  The doctor called in some X-ray technician and he also gave eplanation.  He said that there is no fracture on the skull.  He was from Jikei-Idai Hospital.


N: The deep temperature is taken at rectum or at central part of the head (The latter method is taken at St. Luke Hospital.)  Regardless of physique, sex, age, here is some argillaceous blood and accurate figures can be taken.  Living human beings have 37 degrees celsius but when a person dies, this temperature goes down and my husband was 27 degrees, which was written at 3 places of his medical record.  Since the temperature went down by 10 degrees, he should have died 10 hours prior.  When a person dies, this temperature goes down by one degree each hour.


N: The estimated death time did not match with the deep body temperature.  According to the necroscopy report, his death time was 5 am.  The police announced that he went to the hotel at 0:45 am.  However, according to the estimated death time from his deep body temperature, by then, he should have been dead.  If that was the case, he even didn’t stay at the hotel.

N: The press conference was until 10:05 pm.  Based on the calculation from the deep body temperature, my husband should have been dead before he arrives at the hotel.


N: The estimated death time differes whether he died outside or inside.  At that time, the outside temperature was around 6 degrees celsius.


His body was found around 6 am on the 13th.   According to the temperature measured at each hour by the Meteriological Agency and the forensic text book, here you can see that he had died within 10 hour prior, since his deep temperature became 27.  10 hours had passed before his death according to the textbook.  This is rather a detailed calculation but these materials are good references.

N: If he died outside of the hotel, he should have died at 0:45 at the latest.  That is before he came to the hotel.  If he had been inside the hotel room which should be around 20 degrees, he should have been dead earlier than this.  Even if he had been dead outside, according to his deep body temperature, he should have been dead before he entered the hotel.  So the very fact that he stayed at the hotel does not match with his deep body temperature.


N: This is the X-ray photo of his skull from the sideways.  There is one mysterious point on this.  The white part shows the inclusion of air, which disables a person to breath.  If there is air inclusion in the brain stem, that person cannot breath and die.


N: The doctor at St. Luke Hospital said, “Probably his nose bone was damaged and the air came in from there.  He was punched on his nose and his nose was busted, and then the air came into his brain stem.”  The doctor saw my husband body first, so he should know.  The doctor said that was most probable.

N:こ こら辺に筋肉の筋が入っている。生きている人は筋肉の筋はうつらない。横隔膜、肺が破れると空気が流れていく。筋肉に筋が入るのには時間が掛かっているは ず。筋肉に空気が入るのに時間掛かる。即死でなくて、亡くなるまでに時間掛かっているはずだと。即死だと空気が流れない。

N: Also, there are traces of stripes in the muscle here and there.  There cannot be this kind of stripes in alive body.  When diaphragm or lungs are ruptured, air flows into the muscle.  Before these stripes appear on the muscle, there should be certain progress of time, because it does take time before the air actually intrudes into the muschle.  Therefore, my husband didn’t die on the spot, and in stead, he died after some time.  If he died on the spot, the air could be flown in.
N:ア バラも鎖骨も折れてなくて、背筋もまっすぐ。上から落ちたらこんなものですまない。この辺の肋骨が折れているだけだった。その辺がおかしい。警察発表と全 然違う。報道機関に持っていっても何食わぬ顔。警察が言っているからと。警察が訂正しないと訂正できないと。どこにいったら本当のことを訴えられるのだろ う。

N: His ribs or shoulder bones were not broken and his spine was straignt.  If he fell off from the building, they could be like these.  In his case, only a few ribs were broken.  Strange, but the reality was totally different from what the police had announced.  I took these photoes to the media companies, but media people didn’t respond, saying, “But the police said this and that.  We cannot make correction unless the police makes the correction.”

Where can I report this to?


N: After my husband death, I became sick myself physically and my mental status became unstable for about a year or so.  But when I started searching and saw the X-ray photo, I came to myself.  Donen and the police had never given me proper explanation no matter how I asked.  Though they insisted that my husband committed a suicide, I thought it was so strange since the body didn’t tell so.

N: 主人がなくなってから世の中も動燃も警察の動きもおかしかったので、なくなった前後から日記をつけ始め、全部で250ペー ジ以上になった。なかなか刑事事件にならないので、なんとかして自分の経験や耐えてきたことを出せないかと思ったときに、新潮45で出したらどうかと言う 話があり、経緯を出すことになった。裁判に関係ないことも日記に書いた。「私の夫は動燃に殺された」というタイトル。

N: Since my husband passed away, the move of Donen, the police, and the society as a whole was unusual, so I started keeping a diary around that time.  I wrote more than 250 pages.  Since my husband case did not become a criminal case, I wanted to release what I have gone through and I have withstood, then a publisher gave me a proposal to release an article from Shincho 45.  In the article, I wrote things which were not related to the trials.  The title was, “My Husband was Killed by Donen.”


N: You may not be able to believe it, but I think multiple number of people killed my husband.  His body was not the one who jumped off from a building.  His face, figure, physique all remained as they were.


M: Did Donen ask for any correction on the article after the release of the magazine?

N:一切ないですよね。 私の証人尋問のとき、向こう側が「あなたは夫が殺されたと思っていますか」と。私は「思っている。しかし警察が告訴を受理しないからどうにもならない」と 答えた。国のがんじがらめのところでどうにもならないのかな。例えば警察絡んだ事件がなかなか解明できないのは怖い。殺されたのは私としてはうやむやして はできない。

N: Not at all. In the court trial witness examination, the other side lawyer asked me, “Do you think your husband was killed?” I said, “I do. But I cannot do anything about it since the police doesn’t accept my accusation.”  I wonder there is nothing we could do in the issues in which the government is tightly involved.  It is scary that we cannot get to see the truth when the police is involved.  However, I cannot hush up on this matter since my husband was killed.


Not only you, but nobody should hush up on this case.  There are some scientific evidence, and you said that there was somehing about his suicide note, didn’t you?
N:遺 書って言っているが、私は遺書でないと思っている。例えば、遺書でおかしいと思ったのは、遺書をこういう社用便箋に書くか?自分の会社での肩書きをつけて 書くか?また時間まで細かく書くか?3の数字がまったく別の人が書いているように見える。遺書でなくて始末書のように見える。

N: They say it was his suicide note, but I don’t think so.  For example, do you think one would write his suicide note on a company letter pad?  And with his own title in his company and with precise time?  Moreover, his writing of 3 seems to have been written by another person.
It didn’t look like a suicide note, rather, it looked like a written explanation for his company.


N: Here is the interim report prepared at 6 pm January 11, 1996 submitted to the Science and Technology Agency by Donen.  In the summary on page 5 bottom, there are some similar wordings to the suicide note, such as “biggest factor that changed the accident into a case.”


Also, there was a word, “as a single body (Ichiganto natte)” here and there, perhaps in 3 or 4 sentences, such as, “We, the board members of the Headquarter are determined as a single body to overcome this difficult situation by implementing the actions in line with the direction stipulated in this interim report.”

中 間報告は誰が書いたかわからない。最終的には理事長が承認して提出。稟議書があって、最終的に理事長の決裁がある。動燃としてやっていくことが遺書にも書 いてあるのは、それは主人が理事長だったら書くかもしれないが、次長だったら、上のほうでもなんでもない。自分が一丸となってと言うなんて、やりすぎじゃ ないのと私はやりすぎでないかと思う。

I don’t know who exactly wrote the interim report.  The report was supposed to be handed in after the approval of the Director General eventually.  There is a draft proposal to be approved by the Director General in the end.  If my husband was the Director General in Donen, there could be a possibility he wrote something like that in his suicide note, but he was only a vice-chief, who was not in the position high above.

I think he was way too much by saying, “…as a single body.”

全 社総力とか職員一丸となってとか、そっくりの文言があるが、他の書類にはそういうのはなかった。最近になって知った。主人は動燃の過ちを書かねばならな かったのか?なぜ遺書に書かねばならなかったのかわからない。これからやっていこうと思うと書いておきながら、死んでしまう。死んだからといって動燃のた めにならない。なくなるとしたら、ちゃんと説明すると思う。死んで解決にならない。

There are some other similar wordings such as “all-out effort by the company” or “staff as a single body” In other documents, there were no such repetition of these words.  I came to be aware of this (the common points between the interim report and his suicide note).  I wonder why my husband had to write some mistakes done by Donen in his suicide note.  He was saying what they should be doing and he killed himself.  Killing himself does not contribute to Donen.  If he had to kill himself, he should have explained the reason of his suicide.  By killing himself, there will be no solution.


Monju itself is difficult unlike other nuclear power plants.  He himself was an administration staff and not technical staff.  No matter how he made effort, he could not have understood difficult technical stuff.


I cannot understand his suicide note by any means.  With the date, time, and the company letter pad…I just cannot believe the contents of his suicide note in such a form.  It ws as if he was representing Donen at that time.

理 事長はさらに、遺書を読み上げるとき、内容を変更して読んでいた。その場でこんなに変更できるか。毎日新聞で読んだとおりに全文出したが、オリジナルの遺 書と違う。言葉も内容も少し。順番も後ろを先に言ったり。急に変更して読めるものか?別の書類を持って出たのでは。記者会見の場で。そうでないと急に変え られない。

In addition, the Done Director General was changing the contents of his suicide note when he was reading!  Could it be possible to alter the sentences of someone else’s suicide note?  Mainichi newspaper released the entire note, but some sentences were different from the original ones, both wording and the contents.  The word or phrase orders were going forward or backword.  Is it possible to read the suicide note by altering them on the spot.  I guess they prepared different version of the note at the press conference.  Otherwise, the Director General could have altered the wording on the spot.


N: The Director General passed away on June 13 this year.  When I spoke as a witness examination, I asked, “Could it be possible to read a different wording suicide note on the spot at the press conference?”  If he was reading my husband’s suicide note, I wanted him to read the wording precisely word by word.


N: (Showing the suicide note)

This sentence here also sounds strage. “We, the workers at Donen are detemined to make our continued effort with our pride to secure the energy for tomorrow.”

主 人は動燃の代表みたいなことを書く立場ではない。もっと上に人がいるのだから。部長、室長、役員だとか。次長がこんなこと書くか。私は動燃社員だからわか る。やりすぎ。自分が代表したような。理事長が書くのならわかるよ。これはどっかでマスコミで披露して欲しいために書いた遺書としか思えない。誰が見ても おかしい。亡くなる人が動燃のいく末を考えて死ぬか?

N: My husband was not in the position to write something as if he was the director general of Donen.  There were many people above him.  Department chief, section chief, board members…how could a vice-chief write such sentences?  I used to be a worker at Donen, so I know it was too much.  His writing was as if he was a representative of the company.  If he was the director general, that would be understandable.

But I believe this was a suicide note that was intended to be disclosed by the media.  This suicide note was strange to anybody’s eyes.  How can a person who is going to kill himself in the next moment would think about the future of Donen?

私への遺書。3時40分 まで生きていたのかしらと疑問。こんな一枚で、後のこと頼みますなんて。二人の子どもをねえ。冗談じゃないわよと思ったの。そして、動燃の仲間にお世話に なって感謝しているなんて。書かされたのではないか。マスコミに対しての怒りの文言。マスコミが異常だったから、自分が怒りを感じて死んだといっている。

This is his suicide note for me.  It says 3:40.  I wonder whether he was actually alive at 3:40.  I just could not believe that he left this short note asking me to take care of everything afterwards.  He left me and two sons.  I said to myself, “Enough of jokes!”

In the suicide note, he was even thanking to the coworkers in Donen.  I thought, “he was forced to write.” “He was forced to write some words of anger against media.” In his suicide note, he said that he was going to kill himself because of anger against the media which was extraordinary fussy.


My husband was saying that he was going to commit suicide because the media was fussing around.  My husband was not even in media.  He was not telling me anything about media’s fuss.  His press conference was not even broadcasted.  He didn’t appear on TV or in any magazine.  I don’t think he appeared on TV live.  I don’t think so.


There were 3 press conferences but probably none were broadcasted because all of them were held without much prior notice.  Maybe some TV might have recorded, but…

The first press conference was recorded by TV Asahi.  The second press conference with the Director General was recorded by TV Asahi.  The third one was just before my husband died.  I wonder whether any TV company took it or not.  Maybe some company might have taken it at the 3rd press conference, but it was not shown on any TV program.


The TV program, “The Scoop” had broadcasted some part of the 1st time and 2nd time, but my husband appeared only in the third press conference.  He was not paid any attention or criticized until he committed a suicide.

By my husband’s suicide, media companies retrieved from the overheated coverage.


M: I remember you said your husband had asked you to videorecord Mr. Nakagawa, the newly assigned Science and Technology Agency chief, on the morning of his death.  He was acting normally, right?


N: In those days, he often stayed outside due to some special assignments.  After he left home on January 4th, he only came back twice.  He came home on 8th 9pm and 12th 1pm.  I didn’t know what was going on.  He went to Monju or stayed all night in Donen office and so on.  I didn’t have much time.

12日朝7時半に出社。夜8時から10時5分 に記者会見、それから霊安室。いったい何がこの人に起きたのか?動燃でどんな仕事してたの?と。この紙見たときに、書かされたと思った。会社の紙に書くわ けない。上司に提出する書類、別の会社にお願いする時に提出する事があっても普通は持たされない。メモ用紙代わりには使えない正式書類の紙だ。

He left on the morning of 7:30 of 12th.  He attended the press conference from 8 pm to 10:05 pm on that day.  Then he was in the mortuary.  What on earth happened to my husband?  What kind of work were you doing for Donen?

When I saw his suicide note, I thought, “He was forced to write this.”

It could be possible for him to choose a company letter pad for his suicide note.  Usually, company letter pad is not possessed by company workers.  Only when they write something to their superior or make some proposals to other companies, they use the letter pad and they usually do not have it.  The company letter pad is an official paper not being used for memo or note.


It is said that the director Ohata was the first person who found him.  When I heard his explanation in a pub he called me to come, I asked him, “Where is the FAX my husband received at the hotel?” Then Mr. Ohata became pale and he was gone from the pub.

Prior to this, Mr. Ohata gave me my husband suicide not to Mr. Tajima, the secretary of Director General in the pub.  I was furious that Mr. Ohata gave me the suicide note in such a place.  I thought that he was considering the life of my husband as such a cheap value.

Mr. Tajima, the secretary of the Director General answered to a magazine reporter regarding the suicide note written by a fountain pen, but there was no fountain pen left.  Also there were no extra sheets left from the letter pad.  Why weren’t there any pen or left-over sheets in his remain?

I suspect my husband wrote his suicide note in some other place (not in the hotel room).


He was supposed to have received 5 FAX sheets around 2 am in the hotel, but there was no FAX.


My husband was in the press conference until 10:05 pm on January 12, 1996.  He was supposed to have checked in the hotel at 0:45 am and received FAX at 2 am.

However, there was no hotel registration record or FAX.  Even now.  I cannot get the record of receiving FAX either and I was asking for these thing right from the beginning but they do not submit these items.


Director Ohata, staff in the Management Department, who was staying in the same hotel as my husband didn’t have the FAX either.


I came to be aware of various things.  For what purpose my husband stayed at the hotel with the Director General Oishi.  Director General Oishi, Director Ando, and Section Chief Watase came to the witness examination.  All the three members said that they didn’t know that my husband was going to stay at the hotel.  They haven’t heard that he was going to stay at the hotel and would go for the business trip to Fukui (where Monju is located) the next day.


The third press conference was held by Director Ando, Section Chief Watase and my husband.  However, the other two didn’t know that my husband was going to Fukui next day.  Only Director Ohata and Mr. Tajima (secretary), and Mr. Tomita, the Document Chief new about it.


Section Chief Watase was also the Public Relations Manager and he said that there was no press conference which he wasn’t aware of.
Without reservation, they couldn’t conduct any press conference in Fukui.


When he goes on a business trip, he used to carry underwears, handkerchieves, and others.  Even if the conference was decided with a short notice, the Public Relations Manager should have known it.


Also, the Director General should have accepted the contents of the release of the press conference, so it was impossible to have a conference on the following day.


My husband was looking forward to the Coming of the Age Ceremony for our 2nd son on January 15th.  Whatever failure he did, a parent would be celebrating his own son’s Ceremony.


It is really a pity that a family of a victim should pay for the court trial fee in this Japanese judicial system.  I believe the government is involved in my husband’s death.  It is a shame that we have to do all these by ourselves.


I don’t know whether this case will be solved or not.  I think Donen workers know what was going on with my husband’s death and maybe the staff of Science and Technology Agency might know.  There are something I cannot make a search myself.  If Monju went into operation, it would be very risky since even this kind of case cannot be solved.


If I kept silence, Monju will restart its operation and will have an accident right away.  I am not sure whether I could be useful, but I would like to make my utmost efforts to let people know about this case.

西村さん インタビュー2

Mrs. Nishimura Interview 2


I went to get the X-ray photo on May 1st, the following year (1997) of my husband’s death.


Equipment inserted into his tranchea is shown here.


My husband had allegedly had fractured skull, but the photo didn’t show that.  The doctor also told me that there was no fracture.

こ ちらは側面からのもの。気管を開くために救急隊の人がいれたものです。骨折はしていない。どこがおかしいかというと、息をしている人は、ここは(頭蓋骨中 心部)は真っ白にうつらない。ここが白くなると息が出来なくなる。西村さんはここが白くなっているから、ここに空気が入ってなくなったのでしょうと。あ と、首も異常はないと。警察発表とは違って。

This photo shows from the sideway.  The equipment was inserted to open his tranchea.  There was no fracture.

The funny part was that the central part of the skull cannot be white if the person was breathing.  If the central part becomes white, that person cannot breath anymore.  In case of Mr. Nishimura, since there is white shadow, probably air intruded here and died.  There was no abnormality on his neck either, contrary to the police official information.

こ ちらは胸のほう。胸郭。生きている人だったらうつらないものが移っている。ここに線が入っている。両方とも筋がすーと入っている。これは筋肉の筋。筋肉は 生きている人はこのように残らない。亡くなるのに時間が掛かった時に入る。即死では入らない。亡くなるのに時間が入った。肺か横隔膜に穴が開いていた。

This is the chest part X-ray.  There are something which would not show in case of a person who is alive.  Here you can see lines, both sides.  These are lines along with the muscle.  Alive person would not have these lines.  These lines emerge only when the person died after some time.  He did not die on the spot.  It took some time before he died.  He also had holes either on his lung or diarphram.


Unless he died one hour after some initial impact, this kind of lines would not show.  There would be no air intrusion like these.


If a person got blows on his body and he died after some time, this kind of X-ray photo can be observed.  Forensic doctors can see ritht away that the person did not kill himself by jumping off a building.  The photo shows his ribs and collar bones as they were.  Even spines. It is quite wierd that a person who jumped off from the 8th floor high did not have any impact on his neck or spine.

鎖 骨は誰でも折れる。ちょっとしたので折れることもある。見ただけで普通の専門家はわかると医者に言われた。聖路加にも法医学の教室にも持っていて、見ても らった。慈恵医大の先生は、法医学の人とレントゲン専門の人2人。刑事事件になると、どっかの大学の法医学の人が鑑定することになる。その時に呼べなくな ると困るので名前はふせたい。

One’s collarbones could be fractured even with a small impact.  The doctor told me that any expert could tell by looking at the X-ray for a glance.  I brought the X-ray photoes to St. Lukes and forensic classrooms.  At Jikei Medical University Hospital, I showed them to a forensic doctor and X-ray technician.

I do not want to tell their names since I cannot call them in if this case becomes a criminal case.

I also showed the X-ray photoes to Japan’s most famous forensic doctor, Mr. Masahiko Ueno.  In case of criminal trial, he may be called in.  Another person was Dr. Hasekura from Tokyo Medical and Dentistry University.  He told me that he could not speak up then.  I met him around 1998.


I could not take a look of my husband’s remains.  But one year after his death, I finally opened his remains.  When I opened the cardboard boxes, various things were there.  I was wondering what Donen was doing.


From one box, I found materials which showed that Donen as a company was supporting elections for many years.  There were materials handed down to surbordinates and so on.  The material I saw were related to the 1993 lower house general election.

Is it legitimate for Donen to conduct such thing?  It was funny that Donen didn’t come to my house to pick these things up.  Or should I return these things to Donen?  Why do they not come to my house to retrieve them?

5 年では東海事業所の管理部長だった。その時の選挙に対する、組織ぐるみでバックアップしているのがわかってびっくりした。梶山セイロクと塚原俊平の票を割 り振って応援していた。ここに残っていたのは応援の仕方いろいろ書いてあった。動燃内で二派に別れ、出陣式や食事会など。

In 1993, my husband was a control manager at Tokai branch.  I was surprised to see that he was backing up the election as an organization.  They were supporting Mr. Seiroku Kajiyama and Shunpei Tsukahara.

Various ways of backing these two were recorded.  Donen was divided into two groups and they held kick-off ceremones and meal parties.


The documents specified person to support and where to go for that purpose.  Both Tokai branch and Ooarai branch backed these two people.  They also organized forums for these two people.  Since Donen is a semigovernmental corporation, these kinds of actions are not allowed.  If it was a private company, it is allowed, but if it is govenment related corporation, it is banned.


I could tell that my husband was focusing on these activities without doing much regular work.  He wrote schedules and organization of Donen board members including lists of people who supported Mr. Kajiyama and Mr. Tsukahara.  The list included, the charman, the acting chairman, persons in charge, secretariat.

I could tell that they were making atmost effort to let Liberal Democratic Party to win.  I could tell from these documents.

梶 原セイロクは、後に、主人が亡くなったちょうどその日に官房長官になった。橋本が首相。どんなに不祥事が起きても、梶山が力を尽くした。例えば事故が起き ても表に出てこないように、国民にわからないようにということが結構あった。例えば、東海事業所で事故が起きたのにふせられた。うやむやに書いてあるけれ ど、かじやまのおかげで表に出なかった。これより前の話だ。どっかにでてくるはずだ。95年の事故の前に。

Mr. Seiroku Kajiyama became the Cabinet Chief Secretary on the day when my husband died.  Mr. Ryutaro Hashimoto became the Prime Minister.

No matter what kind of scandals arose, Mr. Kajiyama did his best not to make the scandals into public such as minor accident by Donen.  There were minor incidents which were not known to general public.  For example, one time, there was an accident in Tokai branch, but it was concealed.
It was recorded implicitly, but thanks to Mr. Kajiyama, the accident didn’t become public.  It was prior to the Monju accident, before the year 1995.

Mr. Tsukahara was the Minister of MITI, and he was powerful in that regard.  More than anything, he was the Minister who had direct connection with nuclear business.

I was surprised that lists were complete for both parties.


There were Tsukahara group and Kajiyama group under which Mr. Yamanouchi, the branch manager, Mr. Toda, the vice branch manger, Mr. Ohata, the department manager, Mr. Takagi, the acting department manager, Mr. Tajima, the section chief (the same Tajima who was the secretary of Director General)

K represented Kajiyama and T represented Tsukahara.

This list is for Kajiyama group and this one is for Tsukahara.  You can tell that there was allocation for both parties completely even way so that both of them could get elected.  There are many pages of such documents.


I was very surprised to see this.  I thought Donen would come to my house to take these.  Since these are very valuable.  I was surprised to see these remained in my house.


My husband took these home saying that he could not leave these things in the company office.  That was three months before he died.

My husband was promoted to vice department manager of Management Department from the control manger at Tokai branch on October 1st 1995.  He brought this box at that time.  I had never opened the box.

ど うも東海2区と言うのは、茨城2区、取り扱い注意と書いてある、定員3名のところ5名の立候補予定者も書いてある。前回の平成2年2月12日の得票数も書 いてある。梶山は小渕派。34.07% 塚原は三塚派、73057票、22.52%、社会党が大きい。梶山より大きい。大畠。労働者も多いから。日立製作 所とか。

The document for Tokai 2nd Division says “Manage with care.” It says 5 candidates for 3 seats.  The document includes the last election’s vote on February 12, 1990.  Mr. Kajiyama was from Obuchi faction with 34.07%, Mr. Tsukahara from Mizuka, 22.52% with 73057 votes.

Social Democratic Party obtained a large number of votes, even larger than Mr. Kajiyama.  The candidate’s name was Mr. Ohata.  The area has many laborers since there are companies like Hitachi.


Anyway, Donen had a headquarter for election.


In Tokai village, Donen and Genken were major corporations with lots of young employees.  In Tokai village, there is no big company, so if a candidate gets votes from these two corporations, they will win the election.  There are company dormitories and if the candidates get control of these, they are sure to win.  Even in the district of Hitachi Ohta, these are the areas for the local district.

M: 必勝出陣式とかあって重要な事書いてある。出陣式はどこでやっていたのでしょう。

M: The document says, Kick-off Ceremony for Victory.  Where was the ceremony held?


N: By reading these pages, seems like they held the kick-off ceremony in the board members’ conference room.  It was planned by the chairman Mr. Kazuo Ishikawa on June 25, 1994.  Chores were done by the vice branch manager Mr. Nakata and Nishimura, control manager.

Things to be prepared were 10 bottles of Sake, I am not sure whether they were large bottles or not.  It also said, “peanuts.”  The ceremony convened 50 members.  It was quite a work.


Donen Shunsei Kai was for supporting Mr. Tsukahara.  This was done by other party in Donen with vice manager Mr. Sasao and acting manager Mr. Hagiwara.  This party also prepared 10 bottles of Sake.  Seems like it was well planned to carry out the mission.

こ れはかなりきつい内容。東海事業書総務課、衆議院選挙への取り組み。予想される候補者。総務課は西村さんがいらっしゃった部署。管理部の下に総務課があ る。管理部長だから、主人はその下に総務があるから、その中でこういうのが主な仕事だったのかとも。有権者数50万。支援組織、管理職層、梶塚に分割と あって。梶山会と俊生会と。大畠は組合が応援している。社会党が応援している。

This document here is quite controversial.  It says, “How to tackle with the Lower House General Election by Tokai Branch Management Section”  Here are the names of predicted candidates.  Management Section was the one Mr. Nishimura belonged to.  Under Control Department, there was the Management Section.  He was the Control Manager and underneath, there was the Management Section, and that was why Mr. Nishimura’s main work was like this.  The number of voters was 500,000.  It says supporting organizations, layers of management titles, division for Mr. Kajiwara and Mr. Tsukahara’s parties, Kajiyama Kai and Shunsei Kai.  Ohhata was supported by labor union backed by SDP.

M: 社会党は応援していないのですよね?-管理職は応援していない。

M: Donen was not backing SDP, wasn’t it?

N: No management teams were supporting Mr. Ohhata.


M: Was Mr. Akihiro Ohhata promoting nuclear?

N: I don’t know.  But I don’t think SDP was not against …


Surprisingly, Mr. Ohhata obtained the most votes, 37%.


M: Maybe they thought just one person can win the election, which does not give influence.  Let me check Mr. Ohhata.


Mr. Nishimura’s position was the vice manager of the Management Dept. of the Headquarter when he died.  He beloned to Document Section before he went to Tokai Branch.  He was working in the Document Section when he was young.


Mr. Nishimura was working at Tokai branch for the most time, and in there, there was this Control Dept. under which there were Management Section, Labor Section, Work Section, Accounting Section.  He was there before he moved to the Headquarter, which was 3 months before he died.

本 社に移動したら、先ほどの上のほうまでいったわけ。総務部の次長。次長と言うのはある意味で中間。責任負わされて厳しい。権限があるようでない。部長並み には。部長は長尾さん。今回の事件には出てきてないが、死んですぐにうちに駆けつけて葬儀の采配をし、その後も遺族担当になって中心に動いていた。

After he moved to the headquareter, he was promoted to the vice manager of the Management Dept.  Vice manager is somewhere in the middle.  It was a tough work with responsibility, but there was not much actual authority, unlike the manager.  The manager then was Mr. Nagao, who didn’t appear in the case, but after Nishimura died, he came to our house and prepared for the funeral, and he played the main role to communicate with the bereaved family.


N: Maybe we were being watched.  I could not think of the reason why the Manager Nagao came to my house at the time of funeral.  He coordinated over-all funeral ceremony.


M: You said that your relatives and acquaintances were told to leave and your house’s intercom was broken.

N: First Mr. Nagao came to my house.  When he came, I already arranged a funeral with a small funeral company and payed some in advance with the arrangement of shelves and flower sets.  I already arranged the time even and when the funeral company staff tried to leave, Mr. Nagao came into my house, which was a quite surprise to me.

駐 車場、ハイヤーが6台が入るところがないといけないと。駅のすぐ近くだから駐車場はないと。うちとしては60名でよいと思ったので、いいと思った。6台は よほど大きくないと。それで大きなところを紹介すると、電話を掛けた。たまたま空いていた。それで大きな葬儀屋さんが来て話をしていた。

Mr. Nagao told me that there should be a parking lot where 6 chauffeur-driven cars can stay.  I told him that the funeral place is just near the train station and there was no parking lot.  I thought it was fine since I plan to have a funeral with around 60 people.  But if we have to think of 6 hired cars, we need to use quite a big funeral place.  Mr. Nagao told me that he would arrange with a big funeral place and made a phone call.  He said that it happened to have vacancies, and the big funeral company staff came to my house and talked with Mr. Nagao.


I already arranged an urn and costume, so I thought to myself, “Well, all over again..”


Mr. Nagao told the funeral staff to make the number of guests who give condolence messages to 4 people.  Then the funeral staff said that they could not make it to the crematory with such a schedule.  They kept long discussion and finally the staff said OK.  The condolence message was supposed to be 5 minutes for each person, but in fact, it became so long at the funeral.


My house was flooded with people on the eve of the funeral. I thought it was quite strange.  My husband brother actually died on December 27th and it was a  common funeral with 60~100 people.  My husband funeral was flooded with people who was visiting us like waves.


There were so many sticks of incenses and due to thick smoke, we could not even see the faces of visitors.  I could not recognize my son’s classmates visiting us with their mothers and fathers.


By looking at the registry book, I came to be aware that Donen and big coorporations which had relationship with Donen came to the funeral.  I was wondering why so many company CEOs were visiting.  I could see their names including famous people in the nuclear industry who can be recognized at once even without titles.


I didn’t think my husband was not in a position to have big name visitors like that.  So I sensed somehing political.  I have been keeping the registry books and telegrams of condolences in two cardboard boxes.  The telegram was as many as 250 and they came from all over the nation.

Don’t you think it was funny to receive a telegram from Secregary General Abe from Auditing Bureau?


M: Your husband had a funeral at Tokiwa Kaikan.  The same place as my grandmother.


N: It was quite heavy to move all the telegrams.


N: After I started court trial, I’ve been collecting the newspaper clips.

裁 判でどういうことやるのかしらと。法律用語がわからないといけないといけないと思って犯罪被害者の会に入り、裁判をいろいろ見に行った。傍聴に何回も行 き、だんだんと言葉がわかるようになってきた。弁護士もとろとろしゃべっている人と何をしゃべっているかわからないひといた。でもうやむやにできないから やらなければと

I wanted to know what was going on in the trial, so I joined the Society for the Crime Victims and audited various court cases to understand legal terms.  I visitied courts a number of times to learn various terminologies.  There were some lawyers who were slow and not clear, but I could not make my husband’s case unclear.

主 人は1月13日の朝、夜中だが、政治的なものがからんでいるのではないかと。梶山会とか俊青会とか。切り離して考えられないと思った。当時の新聞を見ると 平成8年1月11日、蔵相窪、官房梶山決まった。橋本内閣1月12日。主人の記者会見は1月12日夜。政権交代のときに主人がなくなった。

My husband died on the morning of January 13 or in the midnight, but I thought there could be some political invovement with Kajiyama Kai or Shunsei Kai.  I could not detach this idea from my mind.

When I look at the newspaper in those days, on January 11, 1996, Mr. Kubo became the Treasury Minister and Kajiyama became the Chief Cabinet Secretary.  The inaguration of Hashimoto Cabinet was January 12th and my husband press conference was the night of January 12th.  At the time of turnover of the regime, my husband died.

偶 然ではなくて必然的に主人がなくなる事が決められていたのでは。橋本内閣が代わると言うのは突然決まったことではない。もともとこのひとたちが1月11日 の前は、もんじゅが事故おきて一ヵ月後くらい。橋本の前は村山だった。自民党が奪還するわけ。その時、梶山が官房長官になって、首相の次になって出てく る。選挙の時に動燃がバックアップした。

Maybe it was not a coincidence, but I suspect that my husband death had been planned.  The turnover of Hashimoto regime was not decided the night before.  The Monju accident took place one month before the January 11th.  The Prime Minister before Hashimoto was Murayama, and LDP took over the regime .  At that time Mr. Kajiyama became the Chief Cabinet Secretary and became the No.2 of the Prime Minister, who was backed up by Donen at the time of the election.


Mr. Hashimoto’s political means was money.  Without money, there was no promotion.  At that timing, on the night of January 12th, there was a press conference and the Director (Safety Director) Ando, PR Director, and my husband announed the investigation of the Monju accident video.

My husband was killed at the timeof Hashimoto Cabinet inaguration.
I think it was not a coincidence.

具 体的には、選挙で動燃が応援している。科技庁長官は中川秀直、その前は浦野さん。新聞に出てくる。警視庁出身である。福井新聞で、福井県知事が浦野長官に 詰め寄っている記事。県だけでなく全国も反対。12月24日ごろのデモもすごかった。一般市民が動燃に押しかけた。原子力政策としてはどうにもならない。 動燃はもんじゅやめてしまえというときに、浦野氏は責任を取らずに中川に代わる。

In concrete, Donen was assisting the election.  The Science and Technology Agency Chief was Mr Tadanao Nakagawa, and the predecesor was Mr. Urano.  It was on newspaper.  He was from the Metropolitan Police Agency.  In Fukui newspaper, the governor of Fukui was pressing the Agency Chief Urano.  Not only Fukui prefecure, but also the nationwide opposing voice against Monju.  The demonstration around December 24th was so vigorous.  Even ordinary people came to Donen office.  As for the nuclear promotion side, they could not do anything about it.

When people called for Donen to give up Monju, Mr. Urano stepped down without taking any responsibility and Mr. Nakagawa came to the position.

人 が亡くなったことで、事故をあいまいにするきっかけに。もんじゅのことが記事からなくなり、新たな生地は新たな内閣のことばかりになった。発足した大臣関 係に切り替わっていった。払拭するきっかけになった。マスコミが責めてからなくなったのではなく、マスコミを回避するきっかけをつくった。

With my husband’s death, the causes of the accident itself became vague.  Monju articles disappeared from the papers and newspaper was flooded with the new Cabinet.   The articles were changed into news regarding new ministers in stead of Monju.  It was not that media stopped blaming Donen but it was rather giving the reason for Donen to avoid media.


When my husband passed away, Mr. Kajiyama came to the funeral.  Usually, this could not happen.  For Mr. Kajiyama, the state policy should be more important than my husband’s funeral.  As main guests, Chief Cabinet Secretary, Ms. Makiko Tanaka, and Mr. Urano came.
It was unthinkable.  That was the reason of 6 hired cars.  Of these these people should have been accompanied by special policemen.

Read Full Post »


Photos showing radioactive steam release via SRV (Safety / Steam Relief Valves March 15th 2011): Original TEPCO PDF: http://www.tepco.co.jp/cc/press/betu15_j/images/151217j0102.pdf


Fukushima-Diary.com: http://fukushima-diary.com/2015/12/phototepco-admitted-reactor2-3-directly-released-radioactive-material-to-the-air-by-3-15-11100svh-in-pcv/

My Analyses (100 % Core loss): https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2015/04/07/ventilating-or-exploding-each-reactor-architecture-must-lose-radioactive-inventory/

December 2015 – similiar photos from the Leningrad RBMK Reactor near St. Petersburg: http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/628592/Chaos-Russians-flee-Chernobyl-style-plant-radioactive-leak

The History of Accidents:

– On 7 January 1974, an accident happened at the Unit 1 of the Leningrad NPP. In case of this accident, a ferroconcrete gasholder of the system to retain radioactive gases was destroyed. There were no victims
by this accident.

– On 6 February 1974, a rupture of the intermediate circuit of the Unit 1 of the Leningrad NPP occurred because of water boiling in it. Three persons were killed by this accident. High radioactive water together with radioactive sludge of the filter powder was discharged into the environment.

– In October 1975, a partial destruction of the core of the Unit 1 of the Leningrad NPP occurred. The reactor was shut down and the core was cleaned on the next day after the shutdown by pumping of an emergency reserve of nitrogen through the core to the ventilation chimney. Consequently, approximately 1.5 million Curie of radioactive substances was discharged into the environment: http://www.greenworld.org.ru/?q=ang_lnpp1_main

NO Reaction from CTBTO in Vienna then and now.





Read Full Post »

Older Posts »


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 109 other followers