Posts Tagged ‘Radionuclide’


From 1989:


His studies:


image from: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/seminar/IS/Imanaka20120627.pdf

“Checherov analyzed all the reports and minutes of the Integrated expedition with measurements and calculations. The analysis estimated the amount of fuel made on the basis of thermal measurements showed that this estimate was based on assumptions that do not reflect the real picture of the thermal situation in unit 4, and secondly, were based on experiments that are not based on reliable measurements, and voluntarist declarations of expenditure thermal parameters experimentally recorded variations of which varies in the range of up to two orders of magnitude.” / “The maximum thickness of the fuel accumulation , measured on the spot and recorded on the film is 0.5 meters , and if you increase the thickness of the layer 8 times, then this cluster should have a thickness of 4 meters.” / “At the time of the accident in the reactor core were 1,659 fuel channels withg 190,257 kilograms of uranium or its kg Uranium Oxide (UO2).

AN Kiselev, Chernobyl, 1986, block 3: “Power of gamma radiation from a channel, lying on the roof of the third block measured by Zherdev was 2 Sievert per Hour (the limit of the measuring range of the instrument DP-5V ) at a distance of three meters” / “we had to work in an environment where radiation levels could exceed the 10 Sievert per Hour and even higher” / “As soon as the rotary drill bit to the fuel clusters, fuel chips along with the water got into the room , and immediately dramatically increased gamma-ray background” / “Biological protection of the camera has been redesigned in accordance with the requirements of radiation safety.” / “On the tube sites were about 15-20 tons of fuel. On the roof lay the whole fuel assemblies. Approximate weight of 300-350 kg each. The rate per person was calculated by removing 50 kg of graphite or 10-15 kg pieces of fuel rod.” / “the total amount of fuel in the lava-like clusters is within 20 % of the entire nuclear fuel that the reactor had at the time of the accident.”

“where, how much and in what state the nuclear fuel ?” / “Our reports of fuel found in the Unit 4 was several times smaller, but the debate as to why such differences exist and where the truth is – was not gebated in this symposium” / “regardless of the fact that the reactor vault is empty and you can not see this amount of fuel and the amount of such fuel just could not fit in the observed areas, those who were there and personally saw it with their own eyes the empty space – you can not convince the others that there are not huge amount of fuel as declared by those who have not been there ” / ” it turns out that the minimum found fuel is 53 % of the fuel, and if we accept the second version, you still have to find the 91%!http://www.souzchernobyl.org/?section=31&id=563

This is from an article of Mr. Kiselev, who was with Checherov INSIDE Chernobyl 4 where the fuel WAS, many many times. “The most significant work in its results was the work of the neutron research laboratory in the past year by VI Morozov. They compiled and analyzed its neutron measurements, which were carried out in the 4th block of Chernobyl nuclear power plant within a few years and determined the concentration of uranium dioxide in more than hundred samples of lava-like fuel-containing masses… After the publication of the work, where on the basis of direct measurements determined the amount of lava-like fuel-containing material (and the results of radiochemical and neutron research) determined the concentration of uranium dioxide in the samples of these masses: the number of detected nuclear fuel in the fourth block does not exceed 20% of all fuel… Research continued: 1991 results were: 23 +/- 7 tons of uranium dioxide – then 1992 research results reduced it to 11,6 +/- 1.9 tons, and direct measurements gave the result of 3,75 +/- 0.6 tons… All reports are published in separate editions, and the magazine “Atomic Energy” published several articles on the subject. The scientific community did not react to it.. the reactor pit is empty, and in under-reactor premises can not be seen such quantities of fuel, and such fuel volumes simply could not fit in the observed areas, and those who were there and personally saw with their own eyes the empty space are impossible to convince that there are huge amounts of fuel, which is proclaimed by those who have not been there… There is a total absence of an active zone in the reactor pit (!)… ”

the Temperature of the Chernobyl nuclear explosion was 100,000 times lower (10,000,000%) than the nuclear explosion of the bomb type.


“Two different models of the nuclear explosions are known. According to, the core of the Chernobyl reactor transformed to a turbo-jet solid-phase engine after a very short initial overheating of fuel. It flied like a missile from the reactor vault to the central reactor hall by the hydrodynamic forces of gas-phase streams flushing down from the fuel channels. Then it exploded as an atomic bomb in the spaceof the central hall.” source: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr79/kr79pdf/Malko1.pdfchernobyl-nuclear-explosion34

The thermal observation showed no melting process and no graphite fire.




IAEA says 96% of the fuel is still in the reactor. But it is not.

In September 1986 126 tons of graphite and 26 tons of fuel were removed from roofs at Chernobyl plant site.

If much Boron is used in western reactors, similar over moderated situations can happen.

Western reactors avoid explosions, via cooking and steaming the reactor cores and letting the aerolized inventory fly through the safety relief valves (SRVs). It`s like a pressure cooker.

NUREG 1250 also speaks of “aerolized” fuel particles after phase transition, on page 6-7.

The industry simply avoids the term “nuclear explosion in a reactor” and simply calls it: “prompt critical excursion.” That`s all.




“an average operating nuclear power reactor will have approximately 16 billion curies in its reactor core. This is the equivalent long-lived radioactivity of at least 1,000 Hiroshima bombs.” http://www.nirs.org/factsheets/routineradioactivereleases.htm


Vladimir M. Chernousenko, Scientific Director of the Ukrainian Academy of Sciences  Institute of Physics in Kiev’s Task Force for the  Rectification of the Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident- HE SAID:

“Radiation emission was no less that 80% of the core (with a total of 192 tons), which amounted to 6.4 x 10^9 Ci (Ci = Curie = 37,000,000,000 becquerel) If we divide the figure by the population of the whole earth (4.6 x 10^9 people) then we get 1 Ci per person.”


“15m³ of radioactive substances emitted from Block 4 at this time could be diluted in 15 x 5 x 10,000,000,000,000 km³ if water, In 100 years 15,000 km³ would be needed. In 1,000 years 15 km³ would be the required amount. For comparsion: the total outflow of the world`s rivers is 36,380 km³.” Dilution is just another word for retransmission. More radiation for everyone.


My summary: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2016/04/21/nuclear-explosion-emptied-chernobyl-concealed-by-the-nuclear-industry/



Read Full Post »


BASICS: http://www.evs.anl.gov/pub/doc/tbl2-rad-prop.pdf

and: https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/531584_10151303321011033_1562438850_n.jpg

The specific activity of Iodine 131 is 4,600,000,000,000,000 Becquerel in ONE gram (or 0.035oz).
ONE reactor is allowed to emit 9,600,000,000 Becquerel of Iodine 131 into the air – each year. Ever second it comes from the chimney – with a full decay time of 2,7 months. It emits Gamma rays, damages the thyroid gland, leads to smaller brained children – and everything else, the thyroid gland controls. And doctors inject 250,000,000 Becquerel into a single patient, during Radio Iodine therapy. In the U.S. up to ONE billion becquerel. And this is only ONE of 200 radionuclides: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/HanfToChern.html

Yearly emissions of a single reactor: 1,555,036,000,000,000 Becquerel (water & air) = 42000 Curie. Source: EdF France http://energie.edf.com/fichiers/fckeditor/Commun/En_Direct_Centrales/Nucleaire/Centrales/Fessenheim/Publications/documents/Umwelt%20&%20Strahlenschutz_Juli_August2011.pdf 1,850,000 Becquerel into air – Source: GE USA: https://tekknorg.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/ge-ari2.jpg It can reach 0,01 – 0,02 Curie per Second from Reactor Chimney and even 0,05 Curie – which are 1,600,000 Curie per Year: “Radioactive Pollution Control in Minnesota, Final Report for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency – by by Ernest Tsivogloue”. https://www.osti.gov/opennet/detail.jsp?osti_id=16313726&query_id=0

MORE: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/02/18/every-year-twice-chernobyl/


> The specific activity of 1 g of Cesium 137 (or 0.035oz) is 3,200,000,000,000 Becquerel:

>113 Kg (or 0,25lb) are enough to irradiate the WHOLE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA with 37,000 becquerel per single m² (10ft²) for 300 YEARS!

And now compare how much Cesium 137 is in ONE SINGLE REACTOR: https://tekknorg.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/reactor-core-bomb.jpg

A 1.3 billionths of a gram of Cesium 137 (4,000 becquerel) creates a load of 100 Becquerel per Kg in the body of a 40 Kg heavy child.

edit 2013: Tokyo University of Marine Science,”8,000,000,000 ~ 93,000,000,000 Bq of Cs-137 can leak to the sea every single day”: http://fukushima-diary.com/2013/03/tokyo-university-of-marine-science-8000000000-93000000000-bq-of-cs-137-can-leak-to-the-sea-every-single-day/

= up tp 0,03 g Cesium 137 PER DAY!

Nuclear Textbook – We always read: “small amount escaped…”
What is “small”?


Indian Point 3 Spent Fuel Pool has 150 Mio Curie of Cesium 137 = 1704 Kg Cesium 137 (or 3756lb)

Full Decay Times of all Primary Radionuclides: http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/Primary%20Radionuclides.gif

Stillbirths and Chernobyl in Europe: http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/stillbirth-EU-Chernobyl.jpg

FULL PDF: http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/content/28/5/932.full.pdf

“if, during pregnancy, there is more than 200 becquerel per kilogram of cesium in the placenta it can lead to sudden death of the child” http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=z9ptFpWJ_eo

How many solar systems can we irradiate?

This is my advise to ensure survival: The Global Cesium 137 Map shows, that it is important to grow INFANT FOOD below the equator, and maybe all other food. http://www.mpic.de/en/press/press-information/news/probability-of-contamination-from-severe-nuclear-reactor-accidents-is-higher-than-expected.html

Above the equator, assuming the risk for anyone to become irradiated with Cesium 137 is 2 % in Western Europe per year, 12 million people become irradiated with it EACH YEAR (everyone: fetus, children, disabled…) this is the reason for Heart attacks, arterial / vascular diseas /-popul. West. Europ ca. 600 mio.-/ Dr, Scherb, Institute of Biomathematics and Biometry Germany: “The relative risks for stillbirth and preliminary malformations are 0,5 – 2 % per 1000 becquerel of Cesium 137 in m² soil.” Page 33 http://www.tschernobylkongress.de/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/ScherbVoigt_fehlbildungen_fehlende_geburten.pdf

European Continent is COMPLETELY irradiated: http://www.unscear.org/docs/JfigXI.pdf Cesium 137: Full Decay Time is 10 human generatons = 300 years.

BELARUS – 72 % of Chernobyl fallout – Belarusian Radiation Maps of the Country: http://www.rbic.by/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=256&Itemid=86

And Radiation Maps of the 300,000 Children in 15 districts (Internal Emitters in the bodies – measured with Whole Body Counters): https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/children-radiation-maps-2/

Germany: https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-Rvm7CeZn1gw/TYcUk22uBvI/AAAAAAAALAw/eakkVrOpPQ0/s1600/Deutschlandkarte_Caesium_Radioaktivit%C3%A4t_Deutschland.gif Nearly completely irradiated.

https://www.evernote.com/shard/s144/sh/3bf332a3-5832-4e34-85f5-40b8a29156bf/a448346b9a5dc9a723b8b407a65feceb and: http://uwa.physik.uni-oldenburg.de/1586.html

Austria: Completely irradiated: http://www.umweltbundesamt.at/fileadmin/site/umweltkontrolle/2001/20_radio.pdf

This map was brightened EXTRA, to conceal Chernobyl on Germany’s territory: http://www.environmental-studies.de/rad_1.1.jpg


Worldwide deposition of strontium-90 through 1990: Keep in Mind: Per ton Uranium there is 836,0 gram (29,5oz) of Strontium 89 & 90. ONE gram Strontium 90 (0.035oz) has a specific activity of 5,300,000,000,000 Becquerel: KEEP THAT IN MIND, if you read somewhere: Only 0,5 g Strontium 90… The Becquerel counts! Full decay time is 285 years = 10 human generations… It mimics Calcium and can be measured in Baby teeth and bones, the most important home of stem cellshttp://www.osti.gov/bridge/servlets/purl/243453-fDbSFw/webviewable/ / BIG PDF File loading…

1998, two dead pigeons from Sellafield, UK Nuclear holocaust plant: Per Kg Pigeon feathers: 246,000 Bq Cesium 137, 26,000 Bq Plutonium 239, 18,500 Bq Americium 241, also Rhutenium 106, Europium 154, and Cer 144. Says Prof. Dr. Kirchner, Germany: http://www.castor.de/diskus/sonst/sellafieldtauben.html

-> 26,000 bq Pu239 = 0,000011 g Plutonium 239!

The same man Prof. Dr. Kirchner, supports Cesium 137 and other radionuclides as tracers of soil erosion! What a crazed action! http://www.iup.uni-bremen.de/PEP_master_thesis/thesis_2012/Thesis_Saba.pdf This is science. Fatal and paradoxical.

570,000 bq / kg = 0,0002 Gram (0,000007oz) of Plutonium 239 in this black substance, so it consists of Reactor Fuel from Fukushima. This is just 0,0002 g! Imagine how many tons are out there! Meltdown is a theory, a distraction, and NOT the worst case scenario, which this black substance shows: http://fukushima-diary.com/2012/10/false-report-570000bqkg-of-plutonium-was-measured-from-black-substance-in-futaba-machi/

Many irradiated children and much food is NOT in the irradiated soil area. Why? Because Fukushima travels. With ingredients and Food. And we even stand in lines in Supermarkets for this.

The connection between high and low numbers: Polonium 210 is in every cigarette.
0,0000125 Gram (0,00000044oz) are 2,000,000,000 Becquerel – a hundred times the deadly dose. Example: http://www.ionactive.co.uk/news_article.html?n=42

Phoswich Detectors in Partial body counter can measure internal emitters such as Americium 241 (decay prodcut of Plutonium 241), Uranium 235 and Plutonium 239, these are low-energy measurements. Measuring takes usually 35 Minutes. Costs: 400 – 500+ USD. http://bibliothek.fzk.de/zb/abstracts/7238.htm

Whoie Body Counters can measure radionuclides in human bodies like Cesium 134 & 137, Strontium 90, potassium 40, Iodine 131, http://biophys.urcrm.ru/sich/index.html#Kozheurov

IAEA is AAAA: Atomic Agency Association of Assasins. Promoting irradiating our Food Chain and Biodiversity: http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/multimedia/photoessays/nutrition/161012/

“It is not a normal situation when the people who are in charge
of the fate of a whole civilization lie quite openly to the whole world.”
–Dr. Vladimir Chernousenko Physicist and Scientific Director of the Chernobyl “clean-up”

CHERNOBYL: “Radiation emission was no less that 80% of the core (with a total of 192 tons), which amounted to 6.4 x 10^9 Ci. If we divide the figure by the population of the whole earth (4.6 x 10^9 people) then we get 1 CURIE per person.” A. A. Yadrikhinskii, Safety Inspection Engineer of the USSR State Atomic Energy Survey Commission. 1 CURIE = 37 billion decays. THE SAME WITH FUKUSHIMA: TOTAL LOSS OF BIG PARTS OF ALL INVENTORY. Reason why there are NO photos of any core fuel.

The split between the generations, tragically undetected: Every new born generation has a weaker immune system. By man made radionuclides and resulting genomic instability. Intolerance of natural substances, allergies, leukemia, ADHD, diabetes… Which doctor measures radionuclides in the body of the child or examines the genome? The whole Science and Medicine says it is caused by a lack of contact with the environment and sensory overload… Thus says the IAEA and WHO: They mean, the fear of radiation is worse than the radiation itself – a deadly lie… The kiss of a mother is dangerous for a child with leukemia, it has no immune system.

So, is the lack of kiss the cause for leukemia? No!

Jan Hemmer

Read Full Post »


“Children’s Health Consultation” September 22nd 2012 “Pediatricians nationwide network to protect children from radioactivity


Register! http://form1.fc2.com/form/?id=665271

CRMS FUKUSHIMA IS JAPAN’S HOPE! Measure your food! Measure your Children!

Real Voices from Medical Doctors 【3】
Fukushima Childrens’ Thyroid Abnormality is historically abnormal.
Far worse than Chelnobyl, Nagasaki, Hiroshima, TMI.
Dr.Michiyuki Matsuzaki, Dr., MD at Fukagawa Hospital.


(Abnormality in Thyroid, posession of Nodules)
1 Fukushima 福島県0~18 才児(平均年齢10 才) あり35%
2 Nagasaki長崎県7~14 才児なし0.8%
3 USA米国等10 才児なし0.5~1%
4 Chernobylチェルノブイリ原発周辺18 才未満児あり0.5%Extremely high risk in Leukemia and circulatory lung deseases are also pointed out.Japan Gov. will start abnormality ratio comparison with other area to verify this situation is normal or not. Just crazy.If the ratio is on a level with Fukushima, the “other area” is also heavily contaminated. That’s it.


Children’s thyroid cancer is (was) an extremely uncommon “disease” (mutation). It’s world spontaneous rate doesn’t exceed 1 – 2 cases per 1 million: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/03/04/japanese-children-cancer-outlook-children-need-absolutely-clean-food/

There are NO SAFETY LIMITS with external and internal radiation exposure!
That is a LIE !
These safety limits only define how high of a percentage they allow on human collateral damage !!


And THAT is the truth !!!!

The only way to measure your children: WBCと食品検査 -何が同じ?どこが違う? http://www.crms-jpn.com/art/200.html


What doctors say:

#1 http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/nn20120831a6.html

#2 http://fukushima-diary.com/2011/11/slow-death/

#3 https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/06/03/fukushima-medical-unversity-accelerating-children-death/


1984, New Scientist: Internal studies of the DOE Department of Energy: Workers of twelve different nuclear plants. Nine of the studies found up to 50% higher leukemia rates, above average: lung cancer, lymphoma, brain cancer, malignant tumors of the digestive organs. Common diseases of the respiratory system were more frequent. 2,529 workers were examined in plants of the DOE. All workers had received more than 50 mSv per year. The cancer rate was three times higher: http://books.google.de/books?id=YIAzHckpZswC&pg=PA3&lpg=PA3#v=onepage&q&f=false

with kind regards,
Jan Hemmer

Read Full Post »