Posts Tagged ‘Radiation’


Written by Lars-Erik de Geer, Swedish Defense Research Agency, CTBTO (!), and University of Stockholm, and Meterological Insitute. Published also in

Nuclear Technology Volume 200, 2017


“The first explosion consisted of thermal neutron mediated nuclear explosions in one or rather a few fuel channels, which caused a jet of debris that reached an altitude of some 2500 to 3000 m. The second explosion would then have been the steam explosion most experts believe was the first one.”

SOURCE: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00295450.2017.1384269

Nuclear Technology 1990

“Two different models of the nuclear explosions are known. According to Checherov, the core of the Chernobyl reactor transformed to a turbo-jet solid-phase engine after a very short initial overheating of fuel. It flied like a missile from the reactor vault to the central reactor hall by the hydrodynamic forces of gas-phase streams flushing down from the fuel channels. Then it exploded as an atomic bomb in the spaceof the central hall.” source:http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr79/kr79pdf/Malko1.pdf

SOURCE: http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/Artikel%20zu%20Tschernobyl%20in%20Nuclear%20Technology%20Vol%2090.pdf

The Chernobyl Core was 190 tons of Uranium Oxide UO².

Each Kg consisted of 2,4 g of Uranium 235. To make the reactor work. This is the situation in each reactor worldwide. To get it run, beginning of life fuel needs this. After a certain period there is Plutonium in the reactor. For Chernobyl it makes 450 Kg Pu239 all together in both halves of the Core.

Ca. 250 Kg Pu239 in normal reactors. With smaller cores. The core was split in two halves, together 10 m length. An electromechanical experiment was started.

Purpose: Could a tripped generator maintain the electrical feed to the main circulation pumps during generator coast down?

Reactivity was reduced.

Security System was blocked, so was the >automatic< scram.

Both turbo generators were shut down.

The behaviour of Chernobyl is similiar to Fast Breeder Reactors (Sodium / lead cooled), also in terms of void coefficient.

The loss of pumping power induced by the experiment caused a rapid fail in pressure, so the water began to boil, at the bottom of the reactor and even at the inlet of the water! The reactor was unstable.

The crew pushed the button of the Emergency Protection System:

The water lies between the moderator (graphite) and the fuel. It captures thermal neutrons. It is more like a neutron shield than an additional moderator. The energy once stored in the fuel was transferred to the coolant.

It continued to boil and saturate and steam and water met very hot surfaces:

So the first explosion occurred and set the reactor dry – this can be described as steam / hydrogen explosion, BUT that was not was the reactor destroyed. Not, what the reactor lid has thrown aside, not what destroyed the reactor hall.

The first explosion had an energy of 200 Gigajoules. All water was expelled from the reactor. All fuel channels became dry. And Water was pushed back into the inlet and the steam drum seperators.

A DRY reactor heats up 100°C (180°F) evey 0,1 seconds! At the same time nuclear reactions take place, NEUTRONS – just below the speed of light. No chance for Reactor Emergency Systems.

The Doppler Effect was saturated. Phase transition was faster than the heating. NO MELTDOWN.

You would need “only” 50 Gigajoules to boil all that water.

Xenon build up. The reactor poisoned itself. But that was not the main cause for the next events:

The Void Coefficient increased. More than 5 $. This is higher than the total antireactivity of the Doppler effect.

A final supercritical state was achieved – This is nothing else than a nuclear Explosion / reaction of the Reactor Type. This principle is known since the first graphite gas cooled reactors were build.

NRC official:http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML0716/ML071690245.pdf 

Fuel Disaggregation requires very high energy: More than 250 Gigajoules.

The crew pushed the Scram Button AZ5. Control rods moved it. They needed 10 seconds, which took much too long. Only a small number of them reached the core.

2 seconds later the Nuclear Explosion / Reaction occurred. This one was 1,000 Gigajoules = 1 Terrajoule. This is the equivalent of 200 – 300 Tons of TNT, or just the yield of a U.S. nuclear W54 warhead.

This nuclear warhead existed and was actually tested. It`s yield: 250 Tons TNT, or, in other words: 1,12 Terrajoule. Exactly the amount of Energy Chernobyl`s two explosions had (one setting the core dry, the other destroying it):

LINK of the 250 tons (0,25 kilotons TNT) Warhead:http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/m-26.html

The U.S. NUREG-1250 report, the official U.S. analyses says in Figure 4.3: 1,400 calories energy were deposited into each gram of reactor fuel UO². That is exactly the 1 Terrajoule: http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML0716/ML071690245.pdf

The fuel was damaged. Each explosion took 1 second.

It included Shock Waves, Cladding rupture, Fuel fragmentation, Phase transition, and as an eye witness said, a blue flash.

The fuel can become vaporized (official NRC data see above).

If 65 % of the fuel is smeared that means the reactor is prompt supercritical = Nuclear explosion / reaction. This is called bigger than 1 $.

The total power of the reactor at the time of its destruction was 47,000 % over normal.

This all happened in 1 second.

Fast neutron reactions happen 1,000 times faster than any chemical or physical reaction.

A steam explosion was not possible anymore. At high temperatures steam ionizes into hydrogen and oxygen. Both do not explode at temperatures above 2,000 / 2,100°C:

Reaching 4,000 – 5,000°C these temperatures were no longer chemical, they were nuclear. Officials tell us: “Chernobyl was a hydrogen / steam explosion” – maybe the first one. But with the heating up, it became too hot for these kind of explosions. Don Arnott (below) said: At these temperaturessteam ionizes and dissociates into the gases oxygen and hydrogen. These detonating gases do not explode above 2,000 / 2,100 °C (all CELSIUS).

The phase transition Uranium Oxide core flew like a turbo jet engine into the air, ca. 20 – 30 m above the central hall and exploded in a nuclear explosion of the reactor type. The temperatures reached at this moment: 40,000°C.

But the Temperature of the Chernobyl nuclear explosion was 100,000 times lower (10,000,000%) than the nuclear explosion of the bomb type.

No water has enough thermal conductivity for that.

This exceeds every safety system human can design and build.

The not welded lid has a weight of 2,000 tons. It was superheated during the explosion and neutron activity. It was seen from the helicopter crew and IAEA as well as soviet officials misinterpreted it as fuel in melting process. Steel glows cherry red at Temperatures 770°C to 800°C and yellow at Temperatures 1,150°C to 1,250°C.

The paint is also still there. It survive a max. Temp. of 300°C.

The thermal observation showed no melting process and no graphite fire.

IAEA says 96% of the fuel is still in the reactor. But it is not.

In September 1986 126 tons of graphite and 26 tons of fuel were removed from roofs at Chernobyl plant site.

If much Boron is used in western reactors, similar over moderated situations can happen.

Western reactors avoid explosions, via cooking and steaming the reactor cores and letting the aerolized inventory fly through thesafety relief valves (SRVs). It`s like a pressure cooker.

NUREG 1250 also speaks of “aerolized” fuel particles after phase transition, on page 6-7.

The industry simply avoids the term “nuclear explosion in a reactor” and simply calls it: “prompt critical excursion.” That`s all.

“an average operating nuclear power reactor will have approximately 16 billion curies in its reactor core. This is the equivalent long-lived radioactivity of at least 1,000 Hiroshima bombs.”http://www.nirs.org/factsheets/routineradioactivereleases.htm

A steam explosion can not develop 1,2 Terrajoule. Steam explosion’s Maxium -> 50 Gigajoules. But the explosionlifted the 2,000 tons lid away, and then even destroyed the reactor hall! How powerful is that. Only a maximum of 10 to 50 Gigajoule of Energy are possible by a Steam explosion in Chernobyl – it was the water expelled from Reactor 4.

Source: http://books.google.de/books?id=vgwAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA65#v=onepage&q&f=false

Other sources say: H. van Dam. says: “900 Gigajoules”:http://iopscience.iop.org/0034-4885/55/11/00

Yes: 1,400 Cal/gm (calories per gram) are 1,1 Terrajoules = equivalent of 0,2 – 0,3 Kilotons TNT.

There was not enough water, power in water, to create so a high energy explosion, for the 2nd one. This was nuclear.

W54 nuclear warhead is the energy yield equivalent of Chernobyl explosion (0,2 – 0,3 KT TNT).

AN Kiselev, Chernobyl, 1986, block 3: “Power of gamma radiation from a channel, lying on the roof of the third block measured by Zherdev was 2 Sievert per Hour (the limit of the measuring range of the instrument DP-5V ) at a distance of three meters” / “we had to work in an environment where radiation levels could exceed the 10 Sievert per Hour and even higher” / “As soon as the rotary drill bit to the fuel clusters, fuel chips along with the water got into the room , and immediately dramatically increased gamma-ray background” / “Biological protection of the camera has been redesigned in accordance with the requirements of radiation safety.” / “On the tube sites were about 15-20 tons of fuel. On the roof lay the whole fuel assemblies. Approximate weight of 300-350 kg each.The rate per person was calculated by removing 50 kg of graphite or 10-15 kg pieces of fuel rod.” / “the total amount of fuel in the lava-like clusters is within 20 % of the entire nuclear fuel that the reactor had at the time of the accident.”

“Checherov analyzed all the reports and minutes of the Integrated expedition with measurements and calculations. The analysis estimated the amount of fuel made on the basis of thermal measurements showed that this estimate was based on assumptions that do not reflect the real picture of the thermal situation in unit 4, and secondly, were based on experiments that are not based on reliable measurements, and voluntarist declarations of expenditure thermal parameters experimentally recorded variations of which varies in the range of up to two orders of magnitude.” / “The maximum thickness of the fuel accumulation , measured on the spot and recorded on the film is 0.5 meters , and if you increase the thickness of the layer 8 times, then this cluster should have a thickness of 4 meters.” / “At the time of the accident in the reactor core were 1,659 fuel channels withg 190,257 kilograms of uranium or its kg Uranium Oxide (UO2).”

“where, how much and in what state the nuclear fuel ?” / “Our reports of fuel found in the Unit 4 was several times smaller, but the debate as to why such differences exist and where the truth is – was not gebated in this symposium” / “regardless of the fact that the reactor vault is empty and you can not see this amount of fuel and the amount of such fuel just could not fit in the observed areas, those who were there and personally saw it with their own eyes the empty space – you can not convince the others that there are not huge amount of fuel as declared by those who have not been there ” / ” it turns out that the minimum found fuel is 53 % of the fuel, and if we accept the second version, you still have to find the 91%!http://www.souzchernobyl.org/?section=31&id=563

We are fooled by IAEA and soviet agencies since 1986!

b) What you see here in this video is NOT the fuel melting, because it was thrown completely out by a force of 1,2 terrajule (0,2 – 0,3 KT TNT)  and it is NOT graphite fire, there was none according to a heat photo scanner Checherov used shortly after the explosions. What you see  is the 2,000 tons reactor lid, that was thrown aside and is GLOWING because of HEAT, it was so hot, that itturned from Red (770 – 800°C) into Yellow (1150 – 1250°C). The helicopter crew did not survive. Interivew with above Infos: Constantine Checherov – Senior Researcher of the Kurchatov Institute – one of the first people who visited the reactor hall after the explosion. He does not believe that the explosion of Chernobyl in ’86 exploded was hydrogen. It was a nuclear
explosion scattered hundreds of tons of radioactive fuel around the station:http://www.novayagazeta.ru/society/6095.html

This is from an article of Mr. Kiselev, who was with Checherov INSIDE Chernobyl 4 where the fuel WAS, many many times. “The most significant work in its results was the work of the neutron research laboratory in the past year by VI Morozov. They compiled and analyzed its neutron measurements, which were carried out in the 4th block of Chernobyl nuclear power plant within a few years and determined the concentration of uranium dioxide in more than hundred samples of lava-like fuel-containing masses… After the publication of the work, where on the basis of direct measurements determined the amount of lava-like fuel-containing material (and the results of radiochemical and neutron research) determined the concentration of uranium dioxide in the samples of these masses: the number of detected nuclear fuel in the fourth block does not exceed 20% of all fuel… Research continued: 1991 results were: 23 +/- 7 tons of uranium dioxide – then 1992 research results reduced it to 11,6 +/- 1.9 tons, and direct measurements gave the result of 3,75 +/- 0.6 tons… All reports are published in separate editions, and the magazine “Atomic Energy” published several articles on the subject. The scientific community did not react to it.. the reactor pit is empty, and in under-reactor premises can not be seen such quantities of fuel, and such fuel volumes simply could not fit in the observed areas, and those who were there and personally saw with their own eyes the empty space are impossible to convince that there are huge amounts of fuel, which is proclaimed by those who have not been there… There is a total absence of an active zone in the reactor pit (!)… ”

Info from Interview with Checherov:http://www.novayagazeta.ru/society/6095.html

So, why a new sarcophagus? Chernobyl as you have read released so much radioactivity as a whole nuclear war.

Chernobyl irradiated the whole European Continent – even pro nuclear UNSCEAR clearly admits that (although their numbers are from the textbook). http://www.unscear.org/docs/JfigXI.pdf

To understand the principle of the nuclear explosion of the reactor, and unmask probably the biggest lie in technological history of human history, just have a look at this:

– Chernobyl was a nuclear explosion

No containment can keep such a explosion

– The weight of the reactor lid was 2,000 tons (NOT 1,000!) – important for energy calculation later below

– A containment would increase the yield of the explosion (pressure!)

– This principle is as old as the principle of man made nuclear fission:

From the book “History of the British nuclear industry” byMargaret Gowing, “Britain and Atomic Energy”, on page 382 the former  U.S. water-cooled graphite reactor at Hanford is described: “To be built in view of the risks of an accident, the reactor is at an isolated location. Because water absorbs neutrons, and when the water flow is interrupted and the control rods do not occur immediately in action, the water evaporates in the cooling system and can no longer absorb the neutrons . These neutrons were therefore available to increase the fission rate in the reactor, which is super critical with power. The temperature rises, the fuel evaporated and the radioactivity is spreading widely. “

On page 385 we find the position:
“The gas cooling is to avoid the risk of severe supercritical state …”

What is supercritical?

The knowledge of the danger of an atomic explosion that can occur in a water-cooled graphite-gas reactor, is as old as theprinciple of the reactor itself.

Safety Assessment Principle 152 requires ‘The containment should adequately contain such radioactive matter as may be released into it as a result of any fault in the reactor.’ Clearly if nuclear explosions are possible a licence should not be granted. LAST PAGE:http://www.spokesmanbooks.com/Spokesman/PDF/91Gifford.pdf

The number of fissions and the energy released quickly escalate, and if the process is unchecked, the result is a violent explosion. Reactions that multiply in this fashion are called chain reactions.”Quote from:http://wps.prenhall.com/wps/media/objects/3313/3392670/blb2107.html

The critical mass in a reactor (even on a pro nucler site): “After pushing the AZ-5 button the emergency protection system added, according to calculations, about a ß of positive reactivity and created a local critical mass in the lower part of the core – resulting in a sharp increase of power there (see Figure 3) and the coming into play of the positive power coefficient of reactivity. The power in the lower part of the core rose to the level at which the fuel exploded and got dispersed.” quote Anatoly Dyatlov, former deputy engineer for operations at Chernobyl:http://www.neimagazine.com/features/featurehow-it-was-an-operator-s-perspective/

Chernobyl was build by ROSATOM – the ones who build a new reactor in Chernobyl irradiated Belarus, the ones who helped Iran with their nuclear reactors, and probably delievered Polonium 210 to kill Litvenenko in London.

The new sarcophagus is built to contain this dangerous truth. The truth that Chernobyl was emptied by a nuclear explosion (of the reactor type, not bomb type).

Who finances this new project? The “nuclear” banks.

Who supervises it? Former IAEA General Secretary Hans Blix. He said in 1986 in Le Monde: “A yearly Chernobyl is acceptable for the world…”

Chernobyl needs no sarcophagus, not today and not in 1986, because it was and is EMPTY. The establishment of a sarcophagus was crazy, senseless and deadly – But right now, they build the 2nd one. A new Containment for a dangerous truth.

The liquidators have not liquidated Chernobyl. The liquidators have liquidated themselves.

800,000 worked in the area. On site, as doctors, workers… but they worked in the Chernobyl Core – which was scattered everywhere. In microparticles. This means: Soviet officialsevacuated 130,000 civilans, but sent 800,000 into the irradiated areas!

Valery Legasov probably knew. BUT:

“Valery A. Legasov” – who was the first russian official who spoke about Chernobyl to the IAEA in 1986, and committed suicide. Before his death he made an audiotape, with untold facts about the Chernobyl explosion. Here are the abstracts of his tapes: “About the accident at Chernobyl” by Academician VA Legasov (text from the 4 cassettes) – in russian: http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/Legasov_V._Ob_Avarii_Na_Chernobiylsk.pdf

His 5 hours long speech at the IAEA 1996 meeting about Chernobyl was ignored: http://books.google.de/books?id=S-SsDtZG5WgC&pg=PA51&dq=new+scientist+valery+legasov&hl=de&ei=Lx_MTuu-BMaEOqb9uKYP&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CDMQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false

He knew about the insanity of sending liquidators to Chernobyl – he could not convince the IAEA and soviet officials. And decades later, Checherov – also from the same institute, indrectly supported the Legasov.


Some say a quake caused the Chernobyl catastrophe. But is the quake maybe the result of the  explosion – expressed as seismic data? Here is the seismis data from 1986, by soviet sources: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr139/pdf/karpan.pdf

This is the NECK SHOT for the nuclear industry. But we failed, because we were blinded by the Meltdown Lie. And we are again blinded by TEPCO and IAEA. They have three empty reactors in Fukushima. They have no evidence where the fuel is. But call it Meltdown.

30 years dear readers. One human generation. One irradiated earth.

Often officials as former soviet Agencies, IAEA, NRC, UNSCEAR,tell the lie of a “hydrogen” or “steam” explosion. That is a lie. It comes from the textbook. Because otherwise reactors would get no licence to be built. They have to keep their inventory inside at all cost. The nuclear textbook is a template and experts push reality through it. The Officials lie about the temperature, or the weight of the reactor lid, or any other data, at least one of them. To downplay the nature of the explosion. But the reactor hall is no more. A fact. Plus the 2,000 tons reactor lid.

50 million Chernobyl curies? IAEA? “The pro-nuclear Time magazine reported in 1989 that perhaps “one billion or more” curies were released, rather than the 50 to 80 million estimated by Russian authorities.” Source:http://www.ratical.org/radiation/Chernobyl/Chernobyl@10p2.html

All radiation maps, doses, emissions are from the text book – not from reality. 50 million curie are:1,850,000,000,000,000,000 Becquerel (1.85e+18) released by CHERNOBYL. A lie!

There is nearly NOTHING left in the Chernobyl 4 reactor! This is proven! 

Argonne National Laboratory in Illinois: 9 Billion Curie

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California: 4,5 Billion Curie


1,85 1,85 1,85 1,85 1,85 1,85… Just remember this number ONE point EIGHT FIVE and the 50

let’s look at the Boiling Water Manual from GE, also for Fukushima:

page 73:

Each reactor releases 50 micro curie of radioactive gases: which is 1,850,000 becquerel PER SECOND!

There is the 50 and the 1,85 again!

It’s all from the textbook!

It’s not the reality!

Can you control atoms?

>>>> A normal reactor releases 1,850,000 becquerel per second.Multiply it with x 10 = 18,500,000 becquerel – these are also the offical MAXIMUM LEVELS of radionuclide activity in the exclusion Chernobyl zone in Belarus (from the 1995 Belarus NATIONAL Report).

The sarcophagus is supposed to enclose the truth and protect the lies.


Read Full Post »


Cancer, George Monbiot and Nuclear Weapons Test Fallout: Article by Chris Busby: https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/03/20/cancer-george-monbiot-and-nuclear-weapons-test-fallout/

background: http://www.ianfairlie.org/news/guardian-articles-by-mr-monbiot-on-dr-busby/


1,3 micro sv / hr = 11,4 mSv per year. only external. internal not included. 3,96 micro sv / hr = 34,7 mSv per year. the same. dangerous to stay there, for glands, for pregnant, for kids



FUEL was vented out from TEPCO’s reactors:








Read Full Post »

What is CLEAN in Japan?

In Japan, if something is irradiated with 8,000 becquerel per Kilogram, it is reused, in public places, for streets, for example: http://natureflow1.blog.fc2.com/blog-entry-565.html


Any area, which is irradiated with 7,400 becquerel per m² is clean:


And what is CLEAN?

Dr, Scherb, Institute of Biomathematics and Biometry Germany: “The relative risks for stillbirth and preliminary malformations are 0,5 – 2 % per 1000 becquerel of Cesium 137 in m² soil.” Page 33: http://www.tschernobylkongress.de/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/ScherbVoigt_fehlbildungen_fehlende_geburten.pdf

“The most important consideration is the generally accepted value judgment that early embryonic losses are of little personal or social concern.” Dr R. Mole, 1979, a member of ICRP – The international committee which makes the dose limits. http://bjr.birjournals.org/content/52/614/89

“possible scale of lost or impaired children after Chernobyl in all of Europe and the part of Asia covered – Missing Children: 2,5 Million.” PAGE 34 http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/RIGEinEuroandCNPPc.pdf

What I predicted 3 years ago: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2014/01/29/japan-look-at-belarus-the-change-in-irradiated-soils/

Read Full Post »

Dear Readers,

here is the final coffin nail for the Atomic Cancer Industry. No peaceful atom, atomic explosions of the “reactor type” are possible:



“The first explosion consisted of thermal neutron mediated nuclear explosions in one or rather a few fuel channels, which caused a jet of debris that reached an altitude of some 2500 to 3000 m. The second explosion would then have been the steam explosion most experts believe was the first one.”

Written by Lars-Erik de Geer, Swedish Defense Research Agency, CTBTO (!), and University of Stockholm, and Meterological Insitute.

Published also in “Nuclear Technology Volume 200, 2017”

And guess what, 37 years before, a similar hard to get article by spanish scientists was published, here it is:


That’s why Chernobyl is COMPLETEY EMPTY!

And that’s why Chernobyl is everywhere, just one of 10 half lifes (full decay time) is “gone”: France stopps Chernobyl mushrooms https://news.sky.com/story/chernobyl-blamed-for-radiation-found-on-mushrooms-being-imported-into-france-11150612



2 seconds later the Nuclear Explosion / Reaction occurred. This one was 1,000 Gigajoules = 1 Terrajoule. This is the equivalent of 200 – 300 Tons of TNT, or just the yield of a U.S. nuclear W54 warhead.


This nuclear warhead existed and was actually tested. It`s yield: 250 Tons TNT, or, in other words: 1,12 Terrajoule. Exactly the amount of Energy Chernobyl`s two explosions had (one setting the core dry, the other destroying it):

LINK of the 250 tons (0,25 kilotons TNT) Warhead:http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/m-26.html

And there is Constantine Checherov, who passed away 2011, and was 1,500 times IN the Reactor, in the Reactor Vault (!), who said this:


The phase transition Uranium Oxide core flew like a turbo jet engine into the air, ca. 20 – 30 m above the central hall and exploded in a nuclear explosion of the reactor type. The temperatures reached at this moment: 40,000°C.

But the Temperature of the Chernobyl nuclear explosion was 100,000 times lower (10,000,000%) than the nuclear explosion of the bomb type.

“Two different models of the nuclear explosions are known. According to, the core of the Chernobyl reactor transformed to a turbo-jet solid-phase engine after a very short initial overheating of fuel. It flied like a missile from the reactor vault to the central reactor hall by the hydrodynamic forces of gas-phase streams flushing down from the fuel channels. Then it exploded as an atomic bomb in the spaceof the central hall.” source:http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr79/kr79pdf/Malko1.pdf

MORE: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2016/04/21/nuclear-explosion-emptied-chernobyl-concealed-by-the-nuclear-industry/

Read Full Post »

Monkeys, Brains and TEPCO radiation:

“The effects associated with long-term low-dose radiation exposure on fetuses are among the many health concerns. Children born to atomic bomb survivors from Hiroshima and Nagasaki showed low birth weight, high rates of microcephaly, and reduced intelligence due to abnormal brain development. Experiments with pregnant mice or rats and radiation exposure had been reported to cause low birth weight, microcephaly or both. We identified one similar study on wild animals, which reported that the brains of birds captured in the vicinity of the Chernobyl NPP weighted lower compared to those of birds captured elsewhere.” https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-03866-8

quoted also on pro nuclear FORBES: https://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffmcmahon/2017/10/30/three-ways-radiation-has-changed-the-monkeys-of-fukushima-a-warning-for-humans/#7f0f60a465ea

Dr. Shin-ichi Hayama seems to refuse to link radiation and brain / head growth development. although it is known for decades, although at the same time he shows a connection. This is the typical scientific behavior. Calling their own studies myth.

Birds, Brains, and ROSATOM Chernobyl Radiation:

“Impaired brain development is linked to oxidative stress because of the high lipid content of brains. Large-brained individuals must be capable of continuously supplying the brain with high levels of oxygen for neuronal ion pumping, synthesis of neurotransmitters and protection from toxic compounds. This makes brain maintenance a highly oxidizing process that requires large amounts of antioxidants, in particular glutathione. Therefore, any environment with low antioxidant levels and/or high rates of use of antioxidants will provide a challenge to normal brain development.” http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0016862

Humans, Brains and US Reactors Radiation:

“mental retardation in children exposed to radiation during the fifth to 15th weeks of their mother’s pregnancy. Radiation kills brain cells, causing both an underdeveloped brain [microcephaly] and mental retardation” https://ratical.org/radiation/NAvictims.html

quoted also on semi pro nuclear NATURE: http://www.nature.com/articles/srep16594

No impact on Science

No impact on UN / WHO / IAEA / UNSCEAR / ICRP / Health Policy / Energy Policy

Genetic damage excluded
All health damage excluded
Environment damage excluded
Subsidies excluded



Read Full Post »



First, we create the conditions that people are genetically altered and then we create the solutions that will make them even more dependent. New genetic anti leukemia drug by NOVARTIS, in the U.S. for 475,000 US Dollars: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/30/health/gene-therapy-cancer.html?mcubz=0


Increases in perinatal mortality in prefectures contaminated by the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident in Japan: http://ebm-jp.com/wp-content/uploads/media-2016002-medicine.pdf

more: http://alfred-koerblein.de/indexengl.htm

“We each carry a load  of about four serious faults  in our DNA. We are saved from fourfold incapacitation by covering most of these faults with a normal gene from our parents.”Better medical care does not mean a bright future, the evolutions phases out each disturbance: ““H.J. Muller estimated that the genetic load accumulated in 8 human generations (∼ 240 years) living under constantly improving medical services with zero mortality rate due to natural selective forces is equivalent to that acquired in a single exposure to 200roentgen (1,8 Sievert) of gamma radiation 2 kilometers from Ground Zero in Hiroshima.”  https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2015/09/22/the-radiation-generation/“Radiation exposure is an inevitable side-effect of our atomic energy programs, as well as of medical X-rays and of our natural environment. The Atomic Energy Commission (AEC = NRC) standards of permissible exposure (about 30 times larger than the level we experience now from atomic energy activities) would increase the natural rate of mutation about 10 percent. Over a period of generations the health costs of these additional mutations would be about $10 billion a year. This estimate and its probable uncertainty by a factor of 10 either way, needs to be factored into the economics of energy production and, more immediately, into the cost-effectiveness of the genetic research needed to plan on a basis of scientific certainty. Most of the atomic-energy related costs might even be canceled if we made sufficient efforts now to develop the countermeasures.”  Joshua LederbergLinus Pauling proved, that by fallout of the atomic and h bomb tests of 1958 15.000 children with severe hereditary error came to the world in one year. 38,000 children were born dead. 90,000 were murdered inside of the mother.Muller H J. 2014 May 12. Video – Hermann Muller (1955) – The Effect of Radiation and other Present Day Influences Upon the Human Genetic Constitution.Genetics in Geneva bookOur Load of Mutations PDF
Government Is Most Dangerous of Genetic Engineers PDFGenetic and Somatic Effects of Carbon 14 PDF

My Mari Takenouchi:

PLEASE CONDUCT GENE TEST AND EVACUATE KIDS IN FUKUSHIMA! 早急に遺伝子検査を行い、福島の子供たちを避難させてください!https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2016/03/11/please-conduct-gene-test-and-evacuate-kids-in-fukushima-%e6%97%a9%e6%80%a5%e3%81%ab%e9%81%ba%e4%bc%9d%e5%ad%90%e6%a4%9c%e6%9f%bb%e3%82%92%e8%a1%8c%e3%81%84%e3%80%81%e7%a6%8f%e5%b3%b6%e3%81%ae/

Thyroid Cancer TODAY: “prevalence of thyroid cancer was 605 per million examinees”: http://journals.lww.com/epidem/Citation/2016/05000/Thyroid_Cancer_Detection_by_Ultrasound_Among.3.aspx

“Dr. Mettler (IAEA) learned well that solid cancers without a ten year latency period did not “count” as radiation-related under ICRP latency models. Therefore the Chernobyl thyroid cancers were seen, but not reported as radiogenic, since they were within five years of a disaster! The nuclear industry has a monopoly on radiation and human health scientific information, and its dissemination through the Universities into nuclear reactor facilities, hospital radiology laboratories and UN organizations. This poses a further serious problem. Normally, one believes the evidence at hand, rather than the theory! If one has been taught theory as fact, the situation becomes more complicated. ICRP has created an artificial “consensus” on the health effects of radiation” from: https://ratical.org/radiation/Chernobyl/CaUFtH.html

Thyroid Cancer – naturally a cancer of old people, naturally one to two cases per million people – BEFORE the atomic age.


Radiation News:

“Over 30μSv/h was read along side the recently-reopened Route 114 in Fukushima, September 20, 2017. It’s nothing more than insane for the government to give a green light people to cross by. 6.5 years mean nothing here. Nothing at all.” quote Kaye Nagayame



= 0,03 Millisievert per hour. Run away. Normal is 2 Millisievert PER YEAR (30 micro sv per hr = 263 Millisievert per year EVACUATE)

720 bq per kg of nuclear substance has been detected in mushrooms sold at a farmers market in Nasu Shiobara City in Tochigi Prefecture. That figure is over seven times higher than the government’s standard. It came to light through an individual inspection. The market has been recalling the products and alerting customers not to consume them: http://web.archive.org/web/20170826142825/http://www3.nhk.or.jp/shutoken-news/20170825/3355481.html

“100 Bq / kg or less is safe” has NO scientific basis
Mr. Yagasaki http://okinawahinansha.wixsite.com/houshanou-kougai/single-post/2017/08/08/%E7%A6%8F%E5%B3%B6%E3%81%AE%E7%8F%BE%E7%8A%B6

“An essential factor is that sensitivity to other damaging effects of molecules, cells, organs and animals changes after exposure to low dose radiation. The indices of health of people exposed to low dose irradiation also change. The bimodal dose-dependence of the effect was illustrated by the leucoses death rate. The explanation is given in terms of the changes in the relation between the quantity of damage and the activity of repair systems induced by low dose irradiation.” https://academic.oup.com/rpd/article-abstract/62/1-2/13/3107577/Low-Intensity-Radiation-Radiobiological-Aspects?redirectedFrom=fulltext

The outlook for Japan in 2021:
Dr. Kazue Kadamori, Investigative Commitee of Atomic Bombing Victims, Hannan Chuo Hospital, Osaka, Japan, IPPNW Conference 1996 (ten Chernobyl years): How Thyroid Cancer is used by IAEA, WHO, ICRP, to conceal all other radiation induced cancers, and even thyroid cancer effects are misinterpretated:



The Japanese radiation victims (anyone who takes in radioactive food) do not suffer from “mental disorders” or “phobias”.
They suffer from the murderous lies of TEPCO, IAEA, Fukushima Medical University (a human-nuclear research lab), from the Abe government, industry, even doctors, and hospitals, and even NGOs and pseudo NGOs like the ETHOS program. It is a catastrophe in a catastrophe. Both man made. The first one attacks the body cells, the DNA, the tissue, the 2nd one attacks the thinking process.
The reality is not just irradiated. The reality is absurd, murderous and not a bit normal. Anyone who does not adapt to this real madness “suffers” from a non existant “mental disorder” or under a trauma. No! People suffer from the fact that the truth is not told to them.
The Japanese population is punished for suffering, for being sacrificed and feeling it, for showing up courage, for telling the truth, even for protecting their kids.

1. About 2 grams of radioactive cesium release radiation of 10 sievert per hour. Scale that up to become your average TEPCO high readings. Still believe high readings correspond to “fuel somewhere” – or are it rather tiny spots causing it?
2. A 1,3 billionths of a gram of Cesium 137 (4,000 becquerel) creates a load of 100 Becquerel per Kg in the body of a 40 Kg heavy child, 20 bequerel per kg cause serious damages to the cardio vascular system.
3. one millionth of a gram of plutonium-239 cause cancer. TEPCO vented 700+ kg to the outside.
4. Polonium 210: A lethal dose of 2 Sieverts would be delivered by inhalation of less than 5 nanograms of the isotope (4.7 x 10-9 grams or 4.7 billionths of a gram).
There are no LOW doses of radiation.
It is always the same energy.

Read Full Post »

There are two programmed possibilities: GO or NO GO. I want to explain it: In the age of symbol, everything is NO GO, as long as there is no symbol, which people introject into their inner world. So they get a “Mapfor the world.

“People then confuse MAP with WORLD” (quote Dr. Ronald Laing).

Especially if something is invisible as radioactive atoms, then people confuse symbols with things / beings. I think, in under 10 years, people will not be able to see and can not believe that a reactor has exploded, even though it happened before their eyes, as long as no GO symbol appears. in the form of CGI graphics, press releases and so on. Not only an exploded reactor – but ANY event.

People will perceive a certain symbol. And this symbol represents a certain standardized fact or data – not more. For example the nuclear catastrophe in Japan, caused by TEPCO, is perceived as “Meltdown” – there exists no photo, no video, nothing, which proves this assumption, this symbol, no molten fuel particle was shown ever to the world since 3/11. Nevertheless, this symbol is accepted as fact, as being, as thing.

What is a meltdown? What is this symbol? It means according to textbook risk analyses, that “only” 3 to 5 % of the reactor core escaped into the enviroment, or expressed into another symbol: INES 7. There exists data – many times shown on this blog – suggesting, that nearly all of the inventory was vented out. But there exists no symbol for it.

Why is that? Shocks like catastrophes are ignored, or simply “events“. An event is not as bad as a catastrophe. Now steps are taken, that people simply forget that catastrophes exist, that the word catastrophe exists. In 1984 “very good” was “double plus”.

Back to the radiation: As Chris Busby said I think also radiation is the main reason of “age” of becoming “old”. But it is the “most invisible” thing at the same time.

If the most impotant is invisible, then it does not exist for us. Only as symbol.

With the age of radiation and the age of genetics – both discovered at the same time, we entered automatically the “age of symbol“, where all damage and all risk is embedded into “natural” occuring risks – like Wolf Härtele, a german, suggested in the 70ies, while touring Japan, that ““The next logical step is to embed residual risks in a spectrum of natural risks such as earthquakes, lightning, and the like…”

Or: Where damage becomes “Risk”. So, if an university measures Cesium in the water, then there is only cesium in water. Nothing else.

The next step is: Not measuring at all, so there is NO radiation.

No data, no problem.

or, in other words:

No proof = Meltdown.

because a symbol appears.

Our memory, our mind is a product of DNA; but seperated from it. So I think we are a lifeform, which works biologically wrong. This is because we are not able to protect our DNA. I tried it to explain with the sentence, that radiation is invisible, and the damage is “made” invisible, again by symbols, we call statistics.

This biological not correct working phenomena does not stay there. with the invisible translated into symbols, but – thanks to how our mind and social conditioned being works – it will also include the visible (!) world. then absolutely everything is possible. absolutely everything. We see it today, when people say, they can’t believe this and that. it is further blurred of course by fake news, main fake news ironically provided by the biggest press agencies.

If the invisible is also made unthinkable, then the visible starts to vanish.

And only the symbol remains.

And then not even that.


New photos, new assumptions – from underwater robots at Reactor 1 and 3, and no samples, no analyses. By the TEPCO robot. It can be any material, especially since there exists material that has a lower melting temperature than reactor fuel (2,800°C). No proof, only symbols. Remember, 100 tons are missing for reach reactor. A simple photo of “something” is nothing.
If you look for a murder suspect, do you show any person and say “it might be the one”? No. You investigate, gather facts, data, double check. TEPCO just delivers a Toys R Us Circus Show.

A robot tells us what to think by symbols.


Read Full Post »

Older Posts »