Posts Tagged ‘Radiation’



From: http://static1.1.sqspcdn.com/static/f/356082/9624219/1291134934927/WS1_koerblein_Dose_response_ppt.pdf?token=ZxeP0DY3budkxvICxYqib2sakNI%3D

Is homosexuality / sex change a natural attempt / corollary of compensation by the disturbance of the sex ratio by nuclear power?

Millions Fewer Girls Born: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2011/06/110602-millions-fewer-girls-nuclear-radiation-births-science

The gender gap in 1987 – 2007 (Chernobyl gender gap) corresponds to approximately 440 000 theoretical missing female births when only the female sex was affected. If also male births were affected at a ratio of male: female = 3:10, is the gender gap by about 790 000 (180 000 +610 000) male + female births PAGE 32 http://www.tschernobylkongress.de/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/ScherbVoigt_fehlbildungen_fehlende_geburten.pdf

the human sex ratio at birth in several European countries before and after the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant accident was investigated. A long-term chronic impact of radioactive fallout on the secondary sex ratio has been found http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/env.958/abstract;jsessionid=69E27384F9B8CCE48A54AADC6FDA0606.d02t03

Wolff used X-Rays to produce Intersexuality, or an effect of radiation causes a change in hormon balance (as seen in the thyroid gland -> Iodine 131), and so, Intersexuality is caused. http://books.google.de/books?id=9ZUsXdsX57cC&pg=PA265&lpg=PA265&dq=%C3%89tienne+Wolff+intersexuality&source=bl&ots=ZyTgkEq1pu&sig=NNCFNCDYeS3Vw9nXtFM0m8jgJP0&hl=en#v=onepage&q=%C3%89tienne%20Wolff%20intersexuality&f=false and: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15906220

embryonic cells are radiosensitive during the morphogenetic phases (1924. 1925, 1928) and radiation causes omphalocephalic chick embryos: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=0CCYQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ijdb.ehu.es%2Fweb%2Fcontents.php%3Fvol%3D34%26issue%3D1%26doi%3D2203449&ei=gck4UK6_N-qn0QXPyYGgDw&usg=AFQjCNEdBmUO_FTQeuzIQA4D1JzhZ1EcGg

The atmospheric atomic bomb test fallout affected the human sex odds at birth overall, and the Chernobyl fallout had a similar impact in Europe and parts of Asia. The birth sex odds near nuclear facilities are also distorted. The persistently disturbed secular human sex odds trends allow the estimation of the global deficit of births in the range of several millions. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21336635

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9039384 The human sex odds at birth after the atmospheric atomic bomb tests, after Chernobyl, and in the vicinity of nuclear facilities http://www.springerlink.com/content/q15h473440512601/

A positive association of the male proportion in Germany between 1986 and 1991 with radioactive exposure at the district level is reflected by a sex odds ratio of 1.0145 per mSv/a These findings suggest a possible long-term chronic influence of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant accident on the human sex odds at birth in several European countries. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17482426

Read Full Post »


“Diagnoses of cancers were identified from the Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry. A two-fold higher risk for leukaemia and brain tumours was seen among children exposed to dose rates of ≥200 nSv/h compared to those exposed to .” http://www.ispm.ch/index.php?id=377&no_cache=1&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=1585

Read Full Post »



Impressions from:

25 years of German-Belarusian Chernobyl Civil Movement June 18 till 21 – 2015

background: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2015/04/27/25-years-of-german-belarusian-chernobyl-civil-movement-june-18-till-21-2015/

rwi rwh   rwe rwd rwc rwg rwb rwa

Media Report: http://www.schwarzwaelder-bote.de/inhalt.rottweil-ein-jubilaeum-mit-traurigem-hintergrund.b125ca08-7f57-48ef-8d6f-7c931e223d21.html

Read Full Post »


NOT A MELTDOWN NOT A MELT THROUGH! The violence of the explosion would have been massive, if they had not vented Reactor 2.

The pressure building up in the building destroyed it then, also in Unit 1 and Unit 2, and probably Unit 3. Info by Japanese Atomic Energy Commission JAEC, May 24th 2011, 16th meeting: March 14th 6:22 pm – 2号機全燃料 露出 = Ejection of ALL fuel from Reactor 2, 6:22pm March 14 2011:

Read Full Post »


It’s a Set up. Clever, brilliant, murderous intent.

What’s wrong with ETHOS Fukushima and their nuclear daddies:


What’s wrong with the World Health Organisation and the IAEA:


Read Full Post »


Diagnoses of cancers were identified from the Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry. A two-fold higher risk for leukaemia and brain tumours was seen among children exposed to dose rates of ≥200 nSv/h compared to those exposed to .” http://www.ispm.ch/index.php?id=377&no_cache=1&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=1585

CSRP Japan: http://csrp.jp/posts/2190

-> 100 nano Sievert per hour = 0,1 micro Sievert per hour = 0,8 milli Sievert per year <-

JAPANESE TRANSLATION LINK: スイスで低線量被曝と小児ガンのリスク研究 大きな反響

This correspons perfectly to “Childhood Leukemia and Cancers Near German Nuclear Reactors” – World’s biggest 20 years Study – the KiKK Study: http://doris.bfs.de/jspui/bitstream/urn:nbn:de:0221-20100317939/4/BfS_2007_KiKK-Studie.pdf

Increase of Children leukemia around Nuclear Reactors!

ENGLISH: http://alfred-koerblein.de/cancer/english/index.htm and: http://alfred-koerblein.de/cancer/english/index.htm

Swiss Childhood Cancer Cancer and Nuclear Power Plants in Switzerland (as usual attacked by physicists BUT confirmed by physicians: the IPPNW – peace nobel prize 1985): http://www.canupis.ch/index.php?id=studydesign

20 Milli Sievert per year are allowed in Japan! http://www.ratical.org/radiation/Fukushima/FradAlarmsDrs.html

We call Victims of the Atomic Age simply “Cancer patients”. Where are our Geneticists, physicians, oncologists? Are they in a vegetative state?



qualifying five year survival as “cure”, only considering cancer” – World Health Organisation; http://mondediplo.com/2008/04/14who

The main way in which the “radiation protection industry” has succeeded in hugely underrating the ill-health caused by nuclear power is by insisting on a group of extremely restrictive definitions as to what qualifies as a radiation-caused illness statistic. For example, under IAEA’s criteria:

>    If a radiation-caused cancer is not fatal, it is not counted in the IAEA’s figures

>    If a cancer is initiated by another carcenogen, but accelerated or promoted by exposure to radiation, it is not counted.

>    If an auto-immune disease or any non-cancer is caused by radiation, it is not counted.

>    Radiation-damaged embryos or foetuses which result in miscarriage or stillbirth do not count

>    A congenitally blind, deaf or malformed child whose illnesses are are radiation-related are not included in the figures because this is not genetic damage, but rather is teratogenic, and will not be passed on later to the child’s offspring.

>    Causing the genetic predisposition to breast cancer or heart disease does not count since it is not a “serious genetic disease” in the Mendelian sense.

>    Even if radiation causes a fatal cancer or serious genetic disease in a live born infant, it is discounted if the estimated radiation dose is below 100 mSv [mSv= millisievert, a measurement of radiation exposure. One hundred millsievert is the equivalent in radiation of about 100 X-Rays].

>    Even if radiation causes a lung cancer, it does not count if the person smokes — in fact whenever there is a possibility of another cause, radiation cannot be blamed.

>    If all else fails, it is possible to claim that radiation below some designated dose does not cause cancer, and then average over the whole body the radiation dose which has actually been received by one part of the body or even organ, as for instance when radio-iodine concentrates in the thyroid. This arbitrary dilution of the dose will ensure that the 100 mSv cut-off point is nowhere near reached. It is a technique used to dismiss the sickness of Gulf War veterans who inhaled small particles of ceramic uranium which stayed in their lungs for more than two years, and in their bodies for more than eight years, irradiating and damaging cells in a particular part of the body.

quote by Dr. Rosalia Bertell, November 1999 issue of The Ecologist, pp. 408-411: http://ratical.org/radiation/NAvictims.html

Read Full Post »


Tokyo (!):

21 Milli Sievert to 4 SIEVERT (4,207 mSv) per year on playground:

Park closed due to high radiation in Ikebukuro, Tokyo:

LINK: http://www.evacuate-fukushima.com/2015/04/park-closed-due-to-high-radiation-in-ikebukuro-tokyo/

“The government has reopened a section of National Route 6 running through part of the Hamadori region of Fukushima Prefecture” – “5.3uSv/h” ( =  46 milli SIevert per year):

LINK: http://www.evacuate-fukushima.com/2015/03/%E5%9C%B0%E7%8D%84%E3%81%AE%E6%9B%B2%E3%82%8A%E8%A7%92-road-to-hell/

“In Fukushima, the population is in an intricate situation”:

LINK: http://www.evacuate-fukushima.com/2015/04/fukushima-population-intricate-situation/

The atomic energy is everywhere – by TEPCO. But it is no needed for electricity:



Read Full Post »

Older Posts »


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 100 other followers