Posts Tagged ‘nuclear’


NOT A MELTDOWN NOT A MELT THROUGH! The violence of the explosion would have been massive, if they had not vented Reactor 2.

The pressure building up in the building destroyed it then, also in Unit 1 and Unit 2, and probably Unit 3. Info by Japanese Atomic Energy Commission JAEC, May 24th 2011, 16th meeting: March 14th 6:22 pm – 2号機全燃料 露出 = Ejection of ALL fuel from Reactor 2, 6:22pm March 14 2011:

Read Full Post »


It’s a Set up. Clever, brilliant, murderous intent.

What’s wrong with ETHOS Fukushima and their nuclear daddies:


What’s wrong with the World Health Organisation and the IAEA:


Read Full Post »


Since 1990 exists a close partnership between the “citizens’ initiative for a world without nuclear threat” in Rottweil and the Belarusian Foundation “The Children of Chernobyl”  in which they stand in solidarity to help remembering the Chernobyl disaster and build the energy future without nuclear energy.

There is a partnership festival from June 18 to 21 – 2015. This partnership will be held with a variety of events and with guests from Belarus and Japan.

They have supported this German-Belarusian partnership,, designed it, so we would like to celebrate it with you also.

Please book your accommodation in the hostel or the Tourist Information. http://www.rottweil.de

Info about City here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rottweil

15cib 15cia

The fund helped more than 2000.000 belarusians with concrete aid and sent more than 360,000 Chernobyl children in countries all over the world, was nominated for the peace nobel prize 2005. MORE INFO IN THESE TWO LINKS:

Prof. Dr. Gennady Grushevoy – Геннадий Грушевой: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2014/01/28/prof-dr-gennady-grushevoy
VIDEOS of the fund and the NGO:

Read Full Post »



not until 2016, at the earliest, will we know the full number of those likely to develop serious medical conditions.” former Secretary-General Kofi Annan http://www.un.org/ha/chernobyl/docs/sgsm7778.htm

Interview “Hessischer Rundfunk” (Radio Station Germany) with Dr. Rosa Goncharova, from Minsk, Belarus “The catastrophic genetic consequences of Low doses”: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2014/01/05/the-catastrophic-genetic-consequences-of-low-doses/

1) NATURE ELIMINATES MUTATIONS. The Nuclear Industry uses this LATENCY Weapon against us, to create Dependence in Future.

2) Accordingly, the great majority of mutations, certainly well over 99%, are harmful .” Herman J Mueller – father of modern genetics. Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1946

3) The Increase in diseases and genetic defects is the new normal. And the accelerated evolution means we are NOT advanced, We will get older faster, and NOT be older. Each genetic benefit is an accident, NOT an adaptive response.

Radiation exposure is an inevitable side-effect of our atomic energy programs, as well as of medical X-rays and of our natural environment. The Atomic Energy Commission (AEC = NRC) standards of permissible exposure (about 30 times larger than the level we experience now from atomic energy activities) would increase the natural rate of mutation about 10 percent. Over a period of generations the health costs of these additional mutations would be about $10 billion a year. This estimate and its probable uncertainty by a factor of 10 either way, needs to be factored into the economics of energy production and, more immediately, into the cost-effectiveness of the genetic research needed to plan on a basis of scientific certainty. Most of the atomic-energy related costs might even be canceled if we made sufficient efforts now to develop the countermeasures.” Government Is Most Dangerous of Genetic Engineers , Washington Post 1970 – by Joshua Lederberg – 1958 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. http://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/ps/access/BBABXZ.pdf

The Work of Chernobyl Children’s International, by Adi Roche: https://www.facebook.com/ChernobylChildrenInternational/posts/10152873384263295

MORE: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2014/04/14/nuclear-energy-programs-the-genetic-wipeout-in-10-generations/

Good Will is irradiated: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/04/21/good-will-is-irradiated/

The New York Times said 1996: “Chernobyl “compressed several thousand years of evolution into a decade” and “Inherited Damage Is Found In Chernobyl Area Children: changes in DNA in sperm and eggs. Such mutations are passed on from generation to generation.” SOURCE: http://www.nytimes.com/1996/05/07/science/chernobyl-s-voles-live-but-mutations-surge.html

AND, also from New York Times 1996: “Radiation at any level is a uniquely potent cause of chromosome mutations that can lead to so-called irregularly inherited disorders like heart disease, cancer, diabetes, multiple sclerosis, schizophrenia, asthma, rheumatoid arthritis, Alaheimer’s disease and many, many more.” http://www.nytimes.com/2000/06/25/nyregion/l-even-background-levels-of-radiation-are-harmful-922897.html

Japan look at BELARUS: The Change in Irradiated soils: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2014/01/29/japan-look-at-belarus-the-change-in-irradiated-soils/

“Schoolchildren in contaminated areas received radiologically clean food free of charge in school canteens and spent a month in a sanatorium, in a clean environment, each year. For reasons of economy the annual sanatorium stay has been shortened, and communities in some contaminated areas have been classified as “clean”, thus ending the supply of clean food from the state. ” PDF: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/radioactivity/ChronicCs137iico.pdf Radio-Cesium helps dying. Masked by “ordinary” causes of death.

Cesium 137 and Children
Cardiac insufficiency in 18% of children with less than 5 becquerel per kg
65% in children with 11 to 26 becquerels per kg
87% in children with 74 becquerels per kg

MORE of the CHILDREN RADIATION MAPS: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/children-radiation-maps-2/

Chernobyl no longer allowed in Belarus: http://spring96.org/en/news/76869

1,000 villages suddenly clean – no longer irradiated – by official decree: http://www.nbcnews.com/id/6492342/ns/us_news-environment/t/chernobyl-neighbors-ignoring-long-term-risk#.VTfJzOHy0uc


Chernobyl: Radiation emission was no less that 80% of the core (with a total of 192 tons) – If we divide the figure by the population of the whole earth then we get 1 Curie per person – or 3,7 billion becquerel. http://www.ratical.org/radiation/Chernobyl/ChernobylIftI.html

There is nearly NOTHING left in the Chernobyl 4 reactor! This is proven! 

total summary of facts; https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2014/02/09/the-future-is-on-fire/

Argonne National Laboratory in Illinois: 9 Billion Curie

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California: 4,5 Billion Curie


How Chernobyl kills and harms: LINKS below:

Direct Damage To People attributable to Chernobyl

Chernobyl: Evidence of Genetic or Teratogenic Damage to Environment and Humans

Prof. Gould explains How Radiation Kills Infants

Chernobyl and the Human Rights of the Victims (ALARA, ICRP, IAEA)

Chernobyl: The Accident and it’s implications for other Nuclear Reactors

Dr. Bertell on TMI, radiation, Chernobyl, IAEA

“Possible scale of lost or impaired children after Chernobyl in all of Europe and the part of Asia coveredMissing Children: 2,5 Million.” PAGE 34 of new link: http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/RIGEinEuroandCNPPc.pdf

See you in 2016. Hopefully.

Read Full Post »


Diagnoses of cancers were identified from the Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry. A two-fold higher risk for leukaemia and brain tumours was seen among children exposed to dose rates of ≥200 nSv/h compared to those exposed to .” http://www.ispm.ch/index.php?id=377&no_cache=1&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=1585

CSRP Japan: http://csrp.jp/posts/2190

-> 100 nano Sievert per hour = 0,1 micro Sievert per hour = 0,8 milli Sievert per year <-

JAPANESE TRANSLATION LINK: スイスで低線量被曝と小児ガンのリスク研究 大きな反響

This correspons perfectly to “Childhood Leukemia and Cancers Near German Nuclear Reactors” – World’s biggest 20 years Study – the KiKK Study: http://doris.bfs.de/jspui/bitstream/urn:nbn:de:0221-20100317939/4/BfS_2007_KiKK-Studie.pdf

Increase of Children leukemia around Nuclear Reactors!

ENGLISH: http://alfred-koerblein.de/cancer/english/index.htm and: http://alfred-koerblein.de/cancer/english/index.htm

Swiss Childhood Cancer Cancer and Nuclear Power Plants in Switzerland (as usual attacked by physicists BUT confirmed by physicians: the IPPNW – peace nobel prize 1985): http://www.canupis.ch/index.php?id=studydesign

20 Milli Sievert per year are allowed in Japan! http://www.ratical.org/radiation/Fukushima/FradAlarmsDrs.html

We call Victims of the Atomic Age simply “Cancer patients”. Where are our Geneticists, physicians, oncologists? Are they in a vegetative state?



qualifying five year survival as “cure”, only considering cancer” – World Health Organisation; http://mondediplo.com/2008/04/14who

The main way in which the “radiation protection industry” has succeeded in hugely underrating the ill-health caused by nuclear power is by insisting on a group of extremely restrictive definitions as to what qualifies as a radiation-caused illness statistic. For example, under IAEA’s criteria:

>    If a radiation-caused cancer is not fatal, it is not counted in the IAEA’s figures

>    If a cancer is initiated by another carcenogen, but accelerated or promoted by exposure to radiation, it is not counted.

>    If an auto-immune disease or any non-cancer is caused by radiation, it is not counted.

>    Radiation-damaged embryos or foetuses which result in miscarriage or stillbirth do not count

>    A congenitally blind, deaf or malformed child whose illnesses are are radiation-related are not included in the figures because this is not genetic damage, but rather is teratogenic, and will not be passed on later to the child’s offspring.

>    Causing the genetic predisposition to breast cancer or heart disease does not count since it is not a “serious genetic disease” in the Mendelian sense.

>    Even if radiation causes a fatal cancer or serious genetic disease in a live born infant, it is discounted if the estimated radiation dose is below 100 mSv [mSv= millisievert, a measurement of radiation exposure. One hundred millsievert is the equivalent in radiation of about 100 X-Rays].

>    Even if radiation causes a lung cancer, it does not count if the person smokes — in fact whenever there is a possibility of another cause, radiation cannot be blamed.

>    If all else fails, it is possible to claim that radiation below some designated dose does not cause cancer, and then average over the whole body the radiation dose which has actually been received by one part of the body or even organ, as for instance when radio-iodine concentrates in the thyroid. This arbitrary dilution of the dose will ensure that the 100 mSv cut-off point is nowhere near reached. It is a technique used to dismiss the sickness of Gulf War veterans who inhaled small particles of ceramic uranium which stayed in their lungs for more than two years, and in their bodies for more than eight years, irradiating and damaging cells in a particular part of the body.

quote by Dr. Rosalia Bertell, November 1999 issue of The Ecologist, pp. 408-411: http://ratical.org/radiation/NAvictims.html

Read Full Post »


Tokyo (!):

21 Milli Sievert to 4 SIEVERT (4,207 mSv) per year on playground:

Park closed due to high radiation in Ikebukuro, Tokyo:

LINK: http://www.evacuate-fukushima.com/2015/04/park-closed-due-to-high-radiation-in-ikebukuro-tokyo/

“The government has reopened a section of National Route 6 running through part of the Hamadori region of Fukushima Prefecture” – “5.3uSv/h” ( =  46 milli SIevert per year):

LINK: http://www.evacuate-fukushima.com/2015/03/%E5%9C%B0%E7%8D%84%E3%81%AE%E6%9B%B2%E3%82%8A%E8%A7%92-road-to-hell/

“In Fukushima, the population is in an intricate situation”:

LINK: http://www.evacuate-fukushima.com/2015/04/fukushima-population-intricate-situation/

The atomic energy is everywhere – by TEPCO. But it is no needed for electricity:



Read Full Post »


Health Ministry (!!!) attacks the people with a more than 100% increase of radiation: http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ201504180025

530 Minamisoma residents sue government over hot spot delisting: http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2015/04/17/national/crime-legal/530-minamisoma-residents-sue-government-hot-spot-delisting/#.VTUqa-Hy0ue
YOU can take part: HERE

The learned from Belarus: 1,000 areas off danger list: http://www.nbcnews.com/id/6492342/ns/us_news-environment/t/chernobyl-neighbors-ignoring-long-term-risk#.VTfJzOHy0uc


Chernobyl no longer allowed in Belarus: http://spring96.org/en/news/76869

This is about the Hot Spot regulations 特定避難勧奨地点for Minami-sôma. Around the evacuation zones with more than 20 mSv / year 132 families get 100,000 Yen per month. These families sued the officials, because the radiation remains high.

Defiant Judge Hideaki Higuchi rules and bans restarts of Takahama Reactors: http://www.evacuate-fukushima.com/2015/04/defiant-judge-hideaki-higuchi-rules-and-bans-restarts-of-takahama-reactors/

“A court in Fukui Prefecture, central Japan, has issued a provisional injunction blocking the restart of 2 reactors at the Takahama nuclear plant.”
NHK Apr. 14, 2015 http://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/english/news/20150414_37.html
Japan – March 12th 2015: Four utilities to decommission five aging nuclear reactors: http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ201503120041
More Info:
Contract between IAEA and Fukushima Medical Universitys (“Dr” Yamashita)
“…the IAEA will endeavour to organize conferences, seminars and workshops, in cooperation with the University, with the aim of enhancing public awareness of radiological effects on human health and addressing the issue of “radiation fear” and post-traumatic stress disorders in the Fukushima population…”


it is recognized by the World Health Organization that the International Atomic Energy Agency has the primary responsibility for encouraging, assisting and coordinating research and development and practical application of atomic energy for peaceful uses throughout the world without prejudice to the right of the World Health Organization to concern itself with promoting, developing, assisting and coordinating international health work, including research, in all its aspects.http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/Others/inf20.shtml#note_c

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 100 other followers