Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘NRC’

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

reactor2-no-meltdown

The whole thing started in the morning of March 14th 2011, when the water level decreased further. TEPCO said the fuel burned, fell to ground, remained there, started to melt. BUT: Reactions = Pressure in Containment, what to do? ANSWER:
The pressure cooker recipe for reactors:
Make sure your reactor has a containment and exhaust valves.
If you notice that the water level drops, then open the valves to relieve pressure. The fuel enters into a phase transition and is drained piece by piece until the entire inventory is gone.
Tell the world public then, the core “had melted” (Then everyone believes the core is still there). Not a single photo of any molten material since 2011! But the world is told the Meltdown Fairy Tale.
Important: HIDE measuring results from the vicinity of the reactor.
BECAUSE: High values ​​indicate where the fuel was blown off and where it was distributed to. Evauation is needed, stop all Reactors. They can not afford this truth!

TEPCO cooked Reactor 2 Core and blown it out completely, to avoid a nuclear explosion of the reactor type, because of the pressure in the containment, that increased. Reactor Fuel can develop a yield of more than 1 Terrajoule, which is 0,2 – 0,3 KT TNT. No containment can survive this. AND: TO avoid that the world could learn: A nuclear explosion is possible in each reactor. THE END OF NUCLER FISSION ENERGY.

That’s why “25 Sv/h from the damaged stack for reactor1 and 2 / Highest reading outside of the buildings” was measured: http://fukushima-diary.com/2013/12/tepco-attached-a-dosimeter-on-the-top-of-a-pole-moved-it-by-a-minitruck-to-measure-25-svh/ quote by Fukushima-Diary.com

1.6 Sv/h on the first floor of reactor1 / Highly radioactive source is in the vent pipe (update): http://fukushima-diary.com/2014/01/1-6-svh-on-the-first-floor-of-reactor1-highly-radioactive-source-is-in-the-vent-pipe/

A dry reactor heats up 100°C every 0,1 seconds and becomes so supercritical, that it even overtakes the Doppler Effect: http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/Artikel%20zu%20Tschernobyl%20in%20Nuclear%20Technology%20Vol%2090.pdf 

It started in the evening, but The PEAK was in the very late evening of March 14th 2011. Reactor containment = Pressure Cooker for reactor fuel

1) According to KAWATA Toumio, Fellow of the Nuclear Waste Management Organization of Japan (NUMO), all reactor inventory of Fukushima Reactor 2 was released on March 14th 2011, 6:22 pm: http://www.strahlentelex.de/Stx_11_588_S01-02.pdf

nucler-mental

What DATA exists than can explain this?

2) From TEPCO’s emergency correspondence to JAPANESE GOVERNMENT, starting March 11th 2011. Official Data: Up to 110 milli Sievert PER HOUR in air distance 0,28 km to Fukushima Plant, Wind South-East & 64 milli Sievert PER HOUR distance 4,29 km to Fukushima Plant, Wind South-East. ALL DATA: http://fukushima-diary.com/2012/04/emergency-correspondence-between-jp-gov-and-tepco-right-after-311/

HERE IS THE SUMMARY / OVERVIEW:

Then we can read about the 400 mSv per hour measuerd near the plant (“There was a media report of a 40-rem dose measured somewhere near the plant.”) quote from NRC on PAGE 15: http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1205/ML12052A106.pdf

This is brutal high! Normal is 1 – 2 mSv per YEAR! And this combines EVERY RADIATION COMING FROM THE WHOLE UNIVERSE TO US! Credit this!

Even the daily dose at a 1000 Curie per km² area, for example near Chernobyl reactor 4 / hot sport, with 37 mio becquerel per m² (map) is something like 10 mSv PER DAY

But Fukushima! 110 milli Sievert PER HOUR! Even at a distance of 280 Meters on the Sea!

2012 / 2013 Readings:

1) Where Reactor Inventory was vented to, via wind – THE BLACK SUBSTANCE: https://www.facebook.com/notes/311-fukushima-watchdogs/black-substance-rei-shiva-en/126411687499573

2) Where Reactor Inventory was vented to, via wind: 80 km distance to Fukushima: “40 micro sv / hr = 350 Millisievert per year: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=10200465957291378&set=vb.1830343586&type=2&theater

3) Where it went on plant site: 25 Sievert near Reactor 2 – That is REACTOR FUEL! http://fukushima-diary.com/2013/12/tepco-attached-a-dosimeter-on-the-top-of-a-pole-moved-it-by-a-minitruck-to-measure-25-svh/

TEPC-NRC-ChernoFuku Chernobyl4

The control rods are made of

>> cadmium (melting point: 321.07 °C, 594.22 K, 609.93 °F)

>> silver (961°C) 1234.93 K, 1763.2 °F)

>> indium (156°C 429.7485 K, 313.8773 °F)

>> The cladding (zirconium), which they found in parts outside the plant: 1857 °C

Melting point of the UO² fuel: 2800°C.

If something goes wrong, the control rods melt first.

On 14 March 2011 at 6:22 pm clock local time there were HUGE emissions of the entire radioactive inventory of the reactor 2 with a subsequent sharp increase in the dose rate to several millisieverts per hour (mSv / h), into various areas. On the following two days there were then more fires and explosions, which were also coming from the reactor 4 which then caused Tepco to measure a local dose of 400 mSv / h. These findings were presented to Toumio Kawata, a fellow of the Nuclear Waste Management Organization of Japan, at the 16th Meeting of the Japanese nuclear Commission on 24 May 2011. “Strahlentelex” has his manuscript been made available: http://www.strahlentelex.de/Stx_11_586_S05-06.pdf

and 2014? THEY WANT A CONTROLLED MELTDOWN! http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2014/01/10/japan-nuclear-agency-to-conduct-controlled-meltdown-japan-nuclear-agency-to-conduct-controlled-meltdown

EDIT FROM 2014: http://fukushima-diary.com/2014/01/evidence-to-prove-reactor2-also-possibly-exploded-in-311-was-found-hole-on-suppression-chamber/#comment-1625622

and: hole in Fukushima Daiichi Unit 2 suppression pool http://photo.tepco.co.jp/date/2013/201311-j/130313-04j.html

nrc02 nrc01

The TEPCO Numbers fit also the flooding of the CTBTO measurement stations in Japan (CTBT global network): http://www.ctbto.org/map/#ims

http://www.ctbto.org/press-centre/highlights/2011/fukushima-related-measurements-by-the-ctbto/fukushima-related-measurements-by-the-ctbto-page-2/

“Two stations of the CTBTO network, Okinawa and Takasaki, are located in Japan, but 133Xe (XENON) measurements are made only at Takasaki. However, the Takasaki noble gas detections were, for an extended period of time, reaching the dynamic range of the system, meaning that measurements were so high that they became unreliable. Regarding the 137Cs (CESIUM) measurements at Takasaki, there was another problem:”

“During the first passage of the plume at this station, radioactivity entered the interior of the building. This resulted in a serious contamination, meaning that 137Cs shows up continuously in the measurements since the initial event, even when it is completely absent in the ambient air.”

“Both stations are part of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO) – The Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) foresees a global ban of all nuclear explosions. To verify compliance with the CTBT, a global International Monitoring System (IMS) with four different measurement technologies is currently built up, namely for seismic (170 stations), hydroacoustic (11 stations), infrasound (80 stations) and radionuclide (80 stations) monitoring. 60 particulate monitoring stations are currently delivering data to the International Data Centre of the Preparatory Commission for the CTBTO in Vienna.”

Source: http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/12/2313/2012/acp-12-2313-2012.pdf

TEPCO invents sometimes fictitious measurements or gets them from the textbook – at the same time CTBTO Data is covered up. BUT: The “Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics (ZAMG) in Vienna, which also has access to the measurement results of the CTBTO, presented at the end of March 2011 a significantly higher leakage of radioactivity from Fukushima, as the Japanese authorities publicly announced – based on their data, the WHO and the IAEA. General Secretary Chan of the WHO said the WHO would publish CTBTO measurement data  “only if it’s dangerous values.” If that is the case, they decide “alone”.

The CTBTO stations are all equipped with high-volume aerosol samplers. (…) As part of CTBT treaty monitoring, half of the radionuclide stations shall additionally be equipped with xenon detectors. FLEXPART is also the model operationally used at CTBTO for atmospheric backtracking and at the Austrian Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics for emergency response as well as CTBT verification purposes.

According to estimates by the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO), comprised of 60 monitoring stations world-wide under the auspices of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, the first three days of the Fukushima accident alone released about 3.8 x 10 ^ 17 Bq of radioactive Iodine-131. That is about 100 times the official inventory. The Fukushima disaster has also released significant amounts of several other radionuclides which have not even been measured.

The UN General Assembly adopted the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court on July 17, 1998. On July 1, 2002 the statute came into force. “The International Criminal Court is a permanent tribunal to prosecute individuals for genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes.” (Wikipedia, 03/25/2011)

Thus far, the ICC has not accepted criminal or civil cases involving the destruction of natural resources and environmental terrorism. The establishment of its authority to do so is long overdue.

In relation to the ongoing accident at Fukushima, responsible officials from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the World Health Organization (WHO), the operating company (TEPCO) and Japanese nuclear power regulators should be brought before the International Criminal Court and held accountable for their actions.

Failure to aid in tens of thousands of cases and threats to natural resources hundreds of thousands if not millions of people is a Felony.

The behavior of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the World Health Organization (WHO) following the reactor accident of Fukushima is a scandal. WHO has made public statements trivializing the emergency and ceding all of its responsibilities to the IAEA, citing the treaty of 1957. “What is WHO’s role in nuclear emergencies? Answer by WHO: “Within the United Nations system, the IAEA is the lead agency for coordination of international response to radiation events.” (World Health Organization, Japan Nuclear Concerns, FAQ, 14 March 2011, Geneva)

The IAEA – an organization whose Board of Governors is dominated by and comprised almost entirely of nuclear industry members, holds fast to its opinion that Fukushima should be assessed at Level 5 on the International Rating scale for significant events in nuclear facilities (INES).

The quantity of radioactive Iodine-131 released is a central indicator for the evaluation of nuclear accidents on the INES scale. The release of more than “a few 10 ^ 16 Bq of iodine 131” is classified as a level 7 catastrophic accident this (INES) scale.

Apparently, the IAEA, TEPCO and the Japanese government officials in charge have not clearly stated how much radioactive material has been released throughout the unfolding of the Fukushima disaster.

Due to these figures, the Fukushima accident would have been legitimately classified as INES level 7 before IAEA admitted it, too late!

Thanks to Fukushima-Diary.com! http://fukushima-diary.com/2012/04/emergency-correspondence-between-jp-gov-and-tepco-right-after-311/

http://www.strahlentelex.de/Stx_11_586_S05-06.pdf

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

NEW: Protect the children of Japan against radiation exposure 福島の子供を守れ

In 1970 it was proven that human fetus is 500 times more vulnerable to radiation. And in 1978 this was released in the bulletin of atomic scientists: http://books.google.de/books?id=aAoAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA30&lpg=PA30&dq=cancer+stewart+xray+1970+radiographs&source=bl&ots=UGZYt0TZGo&sig=ENE9wYZjjNs3Rh2XyptdZwP3Ucw&hl=de&ei=7545Tu6iF8aAOsLrvbMG&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&sqi=2&ved=0CBsQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false

ICRP has confirmed in 1966 that natural radiation is harmful! ICRP Publication Number 8 from 1966 on page 60. in relation to the health damage caused by natural radiation for the bulk of the world’s population is a risk of sixth order (1 to 10 dead per million per rad / gray) in a few areas with high natural background radiation the risk fifth order. 10 to 100 dead per million and rad (gray). and in 1977 the ICRP publication number 26 said, that, in this sense, regional differences of the natural radiation are so regarded, that the corresponding differences include the damage. and in the ’80s the natural radiation was simply doubled. and in 2011 it became the twentyfold in japan: 20 mSv/a. Natural radiation is used as an excuse to increase artificial radiation with radionuclide-antagonists.

They call that radiation-protection!

Internal Dose for japanese Infants: 1 SIEVERT per year: http://www.strahlentelex.de/RadiationRisk_EU_042011_engl.pdf

“According to the ICRP in 1991, just 5 mSv to the testes could cause damage to offspring – yet this dose was permitted yearly to members of the public, and ten times more was permitted to nuclear workers, in all countries prior to 1990. It continues today to be permitted yearly for nuclear workers in most countries.” http://iicph.org/victims_of_the_nuclear_age

1971: the discoverer of plutonium and president of the USAEC Glenn Theodore Seaborg resigns – at the same time the ICRP reduced the additional maximum dose near reactors for the public from 500 mrem/annual (5 mSv/a) to 5 mrem/annual (0,05 mSv/a).

the USAEC “protects” health and advertises nuclear industry at the same time, later renamed in AEC, then renamed in NRC.

Source NRC (USAEC / AEC before): http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/32111590/seaborg-resigns-from-aec

Source (ICRP 5 mSv/a): http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2596042/pdf/yjbm00117-0064.pdf

! no coincidence !

Thanks to Prof. Ernest Sternglass and his studies about infant mortality near reactors;: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/inetSeries/ejs1192.html

And, in 1991, the ICRP lowered the standard from 5 mSv /a to 1 mSv/a: “For occupational exposure in planned exposure situations the Commission now recommends an equivalent dose limit for the lens of the eye of 20 mSv in a year, averaged over defined periods of 5 years, with no single year exceeding 50 mSv.” page 1:  Source: http://www.icrp.org/docs/ICRP%20Statement%20on%20Tissue%20Reactions.pdf

And in 2011, the japanese government increased it for infants, students, mature, unborn, to: 20 mSv/a

A 2000 PERCENT INCREASE.

Source: http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/breaking-news/japanese-ire-over-radiation-limit-for-kids/story-e6frf7jx-1226061484710

20 mSv mean: below, but still high: 555,000 becquerel per m² contamination (from 1995 Belarus National Report):

17 milli Sievert per year mean: 16,000 – 32,000 additional cancer deaths AND 150,000 – 1,5 million deaths by genetic diseases: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/PP/app1.html by John W. Gofman, Ph.D., M.D and Arthur R. Tamplin, Ph.D. quote “If we use the most optimistic Russell mouse genetic data, and even if we give full credit for slow delivery of radiation, we reach the conclusion that 100,000 extra genetic deaths per year would occur for the allowable average exposure of 170 millirads to the population. This can hardly be construed as an “optimistic” outlook, or a “safe” dose of radiation.”

https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/03/19/effect-of-cesium-and-strontium-on-japanese-children-japanese-officals-irresponsible/

NUCLEAR HOLOCAUST in SLOW MOTION.

“…To provide an adequate safety standard the dose limit of 1 mSv/y have to be reduced to 0.02 mSv/y or 20 µSv/y.”Page 9: http://www.staff.uni-marburg.de/~kunih/all-doc/stoakuni.pdf by Dr. Horst Kuni, Nuclear Medicine, University Professor.

Professor Yuri Bandazhevsky, a pathologist, Rector of the Medical Institute of Gomel, on the ingestion of radio caesium includes – he said: “Clinical checks on children between 1996 and 1999 show that at levels greater than 50Bq/kg there are pathological changes in vital organs and systems – cardiovascular, nervous, endocrine, immune, reproductive, digestive excretory and eyes. Caesium concentrations in the placenta reveal a relationship with nervous system defects in the foetus. The health condition of the population is a disaster but being a physician myself I cannot accept it as hopeless. With all my faith in God and life I appeal to anyone who can influence it: do your best to improve the situation. There is nothing more precious on this planet than life. And we should do everything possible to protect it.” http://www.spokesmanbooks.com/Spokesman/PDF/91Gifford.pdf

Until 1990 ICRP said it is not necessary to evacuate people, as long as the radiation does not exceed 500 mSv.: http://books.google.de/books?id=Ber3ENERfGwC&pg=PA343&lpg=PA343&dq=ICRP+40++500mSv&source=bl&ots=IaOqT2MqK2&sig=l3l0MYGe_nKkaXxvFZxkkG8hP5M&hl=de&ei=gc81TpqyI4PfsgajxLG5Ag&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=8&ved=0CE0Q6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=ot%20exceed%20500%20mSv.%20The%20ICRP&f=false

WARNING TO ALL PREGNANT WOMEN: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/08/03/safe-radiation-levels-never-get-your-facts-here/

IAEA subsequently took its radiation protection recommendations directly from ICRP (rather than WHO), therefore persons from the Commission who also sit on UNSCEAR both make the rules and judge their adequacy: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/Chernobyl/CaUFtH.html

Clause 12 of the Executive conclusion of the Recommendation of the European Committee for radiation risks declares: “…Total maximal permitted dose from all human-caused sources should not exceed 0.1 mSv for population and 5 mSv for personnel”. This publication is declared by the European Committee for radiation risks as “regulating”. It is only common sense that we should follow the recommendations given in this publication by the scientists from Canada, Norway, Great Britain, Denmark, Switzerland, the USA, Ireland, Sweden, Germany, France, India, Belarus, Finland and Russia. page 16 http://independentwho.org/media/Documents_IW/Forum_Radioprotection_English_Abstracts_IW_2012.pdf

“European Parliament hears criticisms of radiation protection standards, but don’t publish findings” Brussels 1998: page 35 for example: Childhood leukemia caused by normal reactor operation: http://www.llrc.org/health/subtopic/stoaabstracts.pdf

with kind regards,

Jan Hemmer

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

The Reactor pressure vessel  (RPV) is around the core with the reactor fuel: http://www.nuclearevents.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/fukushima-reactor-building-containment-110314d-021.jpeg

The Fukushima containment is indeed closed under pressure, unlike Chernobyl, which had no containment. This means that the force of an explosion would actually be greater in Fukushima. If the reactor operator let#s out pressure, it decreases the possible risk of an explosion, but sets free unbelievable amounts of curie / radionuclides.

This is the problem of Western reactors: The control rods are made of a material -> cadmium-silver-indium. If something goes wrong, the control rods melt first. It is likely that the control rods are rather lost than the core. – says Ross Hesketh, a nuclear scientist, ON PDF PAGE 42 HERE: http://wilpfinternational.org/publications/Tchernobyl_consequences.pdf

Normal reactor inventory: http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/inventory-reactor-beznau2.jpg

Screenshot here: http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/control-rods-western-reacto.jpg

The control rods are made of

>> cadmium (melting point: 321.07 °C, 594.22 K, 609.93 °F)

>> silver (961°C) 1234.93 K, 1763.2 °F)

>> indium (156°C 429.7485 K, 313.8773 °F)

>> The cladding (zirconium), which they found in parts outside the plant: 1857 °C

Melting point of the UO² fuel: 2800°C.

If something goes wrong, the control rods melt first.

They are NOT in the reactor 2 video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3Vdiwg6c5o

Then the cladding melts, then the reactor fuel melts.

Radioactive Silver was found in japanese fish: http://www.cnn.com/2012/02/22/world/asia/japan-fukushima-pacific/index.html

when they found zirconium outside the plant they told the public, that it is from the spent fuel. http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/science/news/20110325-OYT1T00127.htm Spent fuel = diversionary tactic.
TEPCO admits reactor fuel left containment – how can that be, if the containment is not destroyed? ANSWER: Pressure cooker system, with a valve / pipe.

quote from pro TEPCO article: http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ201112010004As for the No. 2 and No. 3 reactors, most of the melted fuel stayed within the pressure vessel, TEPCO added.” THEY ADMIT, that Fuel left the containment, but the containment stayed stable. Does this mean that fuel can (I think) evaporize and leave the containment?

UO² reactor fuel can evaporate: http://books.google.de/books?id=9hCLf0u5YUgC&pg=PA21&lpg=PA21&dq=uranium+oxyde+evaporate&source=bl&ots=ctDqVJHxlU&sig=Ht3rYnNJ-tXHZlHU4ibwiVS7Amk&hl=de&sa=X&ei=3Vg2T5yLNYem0AXSpZS3Ag&ved=0CCYQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=evaporate&f=false

And the United Nations ended their study about the health effects under 1 year after the fukushima explosions. ONE YEAR is enough for them. Even the UN’s own WHO says a cancer patient has to survive 5 years to be called “cured” (although the patient might die after 6 or more years). This is not science. This is nuclear holocaust: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/05/21/u-n-launches-study-of-japan-nuclear-crisis-results-directly-influenced-by-atomic-industry/

The term “pressure cooker” is used for the new advanced boiling water reactor (Fukushima’s successor) AP 1000 -> HERE: http://fairewinds.com/content/ap-1000-press-conference-%E2%80%93-technical-statement IAEA advises TEPCO to renew the radionuclide “lie 1986″, for nearly 26 years IAEA lies to us about the remaining fuel in reactor 4. Most of it was Blown out and the same now has probably happened in reactor(s) in Fukushima.

Vaporizing UO² fuel is an old hat. It’s called PUREX (pro nuclear sites: http://www.ne.doe.gov/pdfFiles/i-neri2005AnnualReport.pdf) http://world-nuclear.org/info/inf69.html) and used for the atomic weapons program. The know-how was given to reprocessing facilites. Of course, there is no nitric acid IN the containment like in La Hague, or Sellafield.

1,555,036,000,000,000 Becquerel (water & air) = 42000 Curie. Source: EdF France http://energie.edf.com/fichiers/fckeditor/Commun/En_Direct_Centrales/Nucleaire/Centrales/Fessenheim/Publications/documents/Umwelt%20&%20Strahlenschutz_Juli_August2011.pdf 1,850,000 Becquerel into air – Source: GE USA: https://tekknorg.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/ge-ari2.jpg It can reach 0,01 – 0,02 Curie per Second from Reactor Chimney and even 0,05 Curie – which are 1,600,000 Curie per Year: “Radioactive Pollution Control in Minnesota, Final Report for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency – by by Ernest Tsivogloue”. https://www.osti.gov/opennet/detail.jsp?osti_id=16313726&query_id=0

TEPC-NRC-ChernoFuku

On PDF Page 59 of TEPCO document 1-8 we find: 4 x 10 mSv PER HOUR at a distance of 0,28 km: http://www.scribd.com/doc/88568685/%E7%A6%8F%E5%B3%B6%E7%AC%AC%E4%B8%80%E5%8E%9F%E7%99%BA%E4%BA%8B%E6%95%85%E7%9B%B4%E5%BE%8C%E3%81%8B%E3%82%89%E3%81%AE%E7%8F%BE%E5%A0%B4%E3%81%A8%E6%94%BF%E5%BA%9C%E3%81%AE%E3%82%84%E3%82%8A%E5%8F%96%E3%82%8AFAX1-8 – which is exactly the the 400 mSv PER HOUR mentioned in this NRC correspondence on PDF page 15 (“There was a media report of a 40-rem dose measured somewhere near the plant.”): http://www.houseoffoust.com/fukushima/NRCFOIA/ML12052A106.pdf in my view, this speaks for brutal high radiation, if we take into account, that the air even weakens the concentration. This is 10 times the daily dose at a 1000 Curie per km² area, for example near Chernobyl reactor 4 / hot sport, with 37 mio becquerel per m² (map): http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/Chernobyl-map.jpg and I _think_ this speaks for the lost inventory of containment and inventory. Because it is also reactor fuel, that is all over there (494 Kg of Plutonium 239 was in the burnup fuel of Chernobyl): Page 6 right top: http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/Artikel%20zu%20Tschernobyl%20in%20Nuclear%20Technology%20Vol%2090.pdf
According to KAWATA Toumio, Fellow of the Nuclear Waste Management Organization of Japan (NUMO), all reactor inventory of Fukushima Reactor 2 was released on March 14th 2011, 6:22 pm: http://www.strahlentelex.de/Stx_11_588_S01-02.pdf

“During normal reactor operation subcooled water enters the fuel bundle from the lower plenum and experiences heating from the fuel rods. There are three different types of boiling heat transfer to water in forced convection systems: nucleate boiling, which is an extremely efficient mode of heat transfer, allowing large quantities of heat to be transferred with a very small temperature rise at the heated wall. As heat transfer rate is increased the boiling transfer surface alternates between film and nucleate boiling, leading to fluctuations in heated wall temperatures. The point of departure from the nucleate boiling region into the transition boiling region is called the boiling transition. Transition boiling begins at the critical power, and is characterized by fluctuations in cladding surface temperature. Stable film boiling occurs at the highest heat transfer rates; it begins as transition boiling comes to an end. Film boiling heat transfer is characterized by wall temperatures which are significantly higher than those experienced during nucleate boiling.” page 17: http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1002/ML100220484.pdf and “early boiling transition to within one second. This level of accuracy is acceptable because the conditions at dryout are not changing rapidly enough within one second to significantly alter the post dryout behavior. This provides reasonable assurance that TASC can be used to predict early boiling transition” page 8 http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1002/ML100220484.pdf full archive: http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1002

possible temperatures in a reactor: 4000 – 5000 ° K: http://books.google.de/books?id=oEqd0IeAhccC&pg=PA6&hl=de&source=gbs_selected_pages&cad=3#v=snippet&q=4000&f=false these temperatures ionize steam into hydrogen and oxygen and are no longer chemical but nuclear. the file above is the OFFICIAL british statement.

To IAEA: Stop calling the situation “under control” – because you lost inventory! End the lies! For 26 years you are LYING to the world, telling us, that still 95 % of the Chernobyl reactor fuel is in reactor 4.

Reason: If 95% are IN the reactor, you can say “only” 50 million curie left the reactor. This is the connection: Excluding the possibility of an atomic explosion in an reactor leads to the comclusion that ONLY 5% (50 mio. Curie) left the reactor. That not much fuel can leave a reactor in general. But the violence of the explosions in Chernobyl was 1,2 Terrajoule – the maximum of a chemical reaction is 50 Gigajoule. This is the spanish analysis of Martinez-Val: http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/Artikel%20zu%20Tschernobyl%20in%20Nuclear%20Technology%20Vol%2090.pdf So, it is possible that a) a reactor destroys itself and b) loses all it’s inventory – by 1) explosion / power burst (without containment: Chernobyl) or by 2) short melting process and dissolving fuel process – and pressure drain (with containment: Fukushima).

Chernobyl: Radiation emission was no less that 80% of the core (with a total of 192 tons) – If we divide the figure by the population of the whole earth then we get 1 Curie per person – or 3,7 billion becquerel. http://www.ratical.org/radiation/Chernobyl/ChernobylIftI.html

5 billion curie left the reactor. And every year we have 2 Chernobyl catastrophes by 400 reactors operating: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/02/18/every-year-twice-chernobyl/

Chernobyl’s not welded lid (weight, according to Russians: 2,000 tons) was a safety valve.

Nearly no fuel left in Chernobyl 4 reactor – footage, interviews, starting at 07:55: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CgCydo5Y2sA&feature=related IAEA lies to us since 1986.

EVIDENCE: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zP5neBujiFU&feature=related The containment has to keep the core inside. Yes, but not in every physical state, it seems. And the man who was inside reactor 4 more than 500 times, “Checherov” said there is no radioactive fuel left in the reactor and that a nuclear explosion took place at the reactor, which vaporized the fuel at a temperature of 40000°C (72032°F) Source: http://www.springerlink.com/content/5tr8g6u3v5acxa4r/

explaination: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/11/12/the-atomic-reactor-explosions-of-fukushima-and-chernobyl/

From Xavier Nast :

“Since the beginning, the reports through the conventional media are antonymic.
It means that the authorities knee from the 14th March 2011how much Plutonium are travelling through the atmosphere, contaminating certainly a large place in Japan but also the complete Northern hemisphere. For this reason it is possible to understand now the policy of Japanese government was to shut up the main comprehensive stages, and to give only the secondary information. But also it is possible to understand the closing of all nuclear plant. Now everybody has just to hope random is benefit for himself and their children, because scholastic effects will hit people more and more like after Chernobyl.
I am leaving in an area where Chernobyl cloud hot particles have met a wet atmosphere and the rains have brought down the plums of radio nuclides and contaminated soils and food.
In 25 years I lost 29 people younger as 50 years old from various cancers, people from my family, friends, colleagues, old fellows, neighbors. This one, a lot people from Europe inside a circle of 1000 miles from Chernobyl, has observed the same facts. Oncologists knee the facts and the main cause but they are not allowed to talk. But new cancers are increasing every year and one conclusion is that occurring of detection of those new cancers are 4 times higher that before 1985.
Since 1960 every nuclear physician knows that plutonium is a hyper poison inside a human an animal and vegetable.
Today we will start to understand those old theories. What is surprising is the total deny of former and various experiences, lies of the political responsibles and apathy of the mass?

Ask you just one question: Where is the storage pool of nuclear M.OX fuel from unit n°3?
Have you seen pictures? Have you heart if the water level isn’t still correct? What is M.OX?
You could imagine easily the consequences of Fukushima if you have understood those of Chernobyl, just to imagine the factor between both of them. This is the question? 0.1 , 1 , 10 or more?”

by Stella Blackwell Steinbach

Number of fuel assemblies

In the reactor

400 unit 1

548 unit 2

548 unit 3

? unkown..loading was in progress unit 4

548 unit 5

764 unit 6

Spent fuel assemblies in the spent fuel pool

292 unit 1

587 unit 2

514 U-238 and 20-ish? 10+yrs/old PU-239 rods unit 3

1,331 U-238 & MOX 40 PU-239 Breeder rods unit 4

946unit 5

876 unit 6

New fuel assemblies in the spent fuel pool

100 unit 1

28 unit 2

52 unit 3

204 unit 4

48 unit 5

64 unit 6

Common Spent Fuel Pool

6300 fuel assemblies

by Pattie L. Brassard

Originally… the PU-239 rods in Reactor 4 stood about a foot out of the rack there in the center… unmarked. The don’t have handles, and used a ” C-Clamp ” type bit with pins on sides to lift them and move them. They have burned-off to the point that they are now recessed into the rack. #3 pool had a PU-239 detonation… the age of the plutonium meant 30% of the rods were PU-240 & 241… the PU-240 is what made the nuclear blast fizzle-out. Same goes for the corium of #3 when it hit the water table. There IS NO spent pool on #3 anymore! Its contents burned, shattered, and / or was arisolized in the blast. The rods remaining were thrown all over the ground aroud the buildings.They are now piled / stored in large ” totes ‘ over to the south west of reactor buildings. They thought it was reactor that blew-out.. and used choppers to dump water.. what’s left of the pool maybe holds a foot or two of water now? The pool blast had removed the yellow ‘ CAP ‘ from #3 reactor… but the corium was already gone… and the ‘ plug ‘ on the PCV was still on.. but cracked.. and pissing-out steam. the following day that second in-ground criticality happened.. it tossed the plug way over onto the south-west driveway to the gate !!! And that’s when the real black smoke started to pour out of #3 building. It also ignited the gasses in #4.. methane in lower levels (damaged pool supports) and hydrogen from the now dry contents of the open-top reactor core of #4 – It was being loaded when the quake hit.

Life-Upgrade.com

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

On NRC Server:

From the 1970ies: Mrs. Mary Weik (New York) on Indian Point, Hudson River, Leukemia and Cancer – collected works: http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1002/ML100220378.pdf She was attacked by officials like AEC (NRC) that she was only a “housewife” and her works are worthless. NRC’s response: http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1002/ML100261297.pdf from the NRC server (full of docs): http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1002/

with kind regards,

Jan Hemmer

 

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

NRC “science”:

Former NRC chairman Schlesinger wanted to shoot radioactive waste into space: http://books.google.de/books?id=fmip1KhHnrUC&pg=PA475&lpg=PA475&dq=Schlesinger+AEC+space+radioactive+waste&source=bl&ots=lEbmQ8lYyg&sig=JHFMgVqTcx_DeSm3Tz6G1rJX5CY&hl=de&sa=X&ei=wB84T5GlOoSf0QWm4qinAg&ved=0CDoQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=Schlesinger%20rocket&f=false

No step further today.

with kind regards,

Jan Hemmer

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 71 other followers