Posts Tagged ‘NHK’


1) TEPCO to name NHK chairman as director: http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ201205120047

2) TEPCO shows eagerness to restart reactors at shareholders‘ meeting: http://english.kyodonews.jp/news/2013/06/232494.html

3) NHK holds 7,100,000,000 JPY of Tepco’s bond. NHK is the biggest stakeholder of TEPCO: http://www.asyura2.com/11/senkyo117/msg/360.html

This is one of the reasons why: NHK weather forecasts were without radiation levels FROM DAY 1.

NHK is the biggest stakeholder of these power companies.The sum of money is 34,000,000,000JPY


2.CHUBU power company

3.KANSAI power company

4.Chugoku power company

5.Tohoku power company

NHK doesn’t show radiation levels per city / region during their Weather Forecasts. NHK told the people, the biggest danger goes out from Iodine.

Just like in 1986 – Chernobyl. NISA asked CHUBU Electric to manipulate public opinion: http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ201107295038

And now Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency NISA again plans to restart the reactors AGAINST the People’s will: http://www.newsonjapan.com/html/newsdesk/article/96802.php

2007: Japan Nuclear-Site Damage Worse Than Reported http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/19/world/asia/19japan.html?_r=0

DO NOT LISTEN TO MASS MEDIA.  This is a murderous Agenda they are playing.


Expect ONLY Pro Nuclear from ALL Lame Stream Media. And a total blackout on Civil Society protesting against nuclear holocaust by most media: http://www.aljazeera.com/news/asia/2013/06/2013631371588689.html

And this is the Fukushima Holocaust Sponsors Club: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2013/06/03/fukushima-holocaust-sponsors-club/


Read Full Post »


From: http://ookomachi.blog22.fc2.com/blog-entry-510.html

translation by Mochizuki Cheshire Iori :

Mr.Kimura was an employee of Tepco.He quit it 10 years ago though it took him 3 years.
This is what he told in his speech.



Mr.Kimura was living in 15km west to Fukushima plant.He was at home when 311 happened.It took him 3 weeks to evacuate.The total exposure amount became 20mSv.After evacuation,he had unstoppable
“muddy” nose bleed,and sore throat.It was obviously a low dose symptom. Fukushima plant blasted crucial amount of radiation unlike what the gov told us.Now he is in Kochi.


He tried to quit 10 years ago,being sick of the deception and the lie of Tepco.However,it took him 3 years to quit.


Half life time of Pu is 24,000years,but nuc plant keeps working.He told his boss he can’t torture our descendant.The boss told him ,you are crazy.


He told the boss,you ARE crazy. The boss got mad and told him he should quit.


However,he was troubled to quit because he had an access to their confidential data.Tepco was threatened by his whistle-blowing.


When he was quitting,he was called by vice president and paid addiational 8.5 million yen for his retirement fee.


Iodine131 is produced when it’s in the critical state. The fact that the amount of Iodine 131 is stable proves it’s still in the critical state.
However,Tepco and the gov didn’t admit the fact. Here’s another deception.


Another deception is that 20mSv/y is totally safe.


Especially children and women should avoid rain. Cesium137 tends to be absorbed in muscle,but in case of women,it’s absorbed in uterus and lacteal gland. At least we should avoid breathing it by using double masks (wet one and dry one),and wear a cap because cesium137 is taken from hair too.

CHANNEL 4 interview with Fukushima workers: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ml5gKbStfY

NHK television: They detected cesium from the beef of Fukushima again. The beef was not given cesium hay. They were planning to allow Fukushima to sell beef again but it was postponed: http://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20110819/t10015009742000.html

NHK television: They detected cesium from rice of Hokotashi Ibaraki. cesium134;23Bq/kg,cesium137;29Bq/kg Total;52Bq/kg. They say when it’s processed,the radiation level will decrease ,and it’s way lower than “their” safety limit 500Bq/kg,it’s totally ok. However,according to Dr.Takeda Kunihiko from Chubu university states we shouldn’t take more than 20Bq/kg: http://www3.nhk.or.jp/error/error.html

NHK holds 7,100,000,000 JPY of Tepco’s bond: http://www.asyura2.com/11/senkyo117/msg/360.html

NHK is the biggest stakeholder of these power companies.The sum of money is 34,000,000,000JPY


2.Chubu power company

3.Kansai power company

4.Chugoku power company

5.Tohoku power company

quote Bruno CHAREYRON of CRIIAD which cooperates with CRMS Japan: “So then the question is : what are the norms that will be fixed on these foods ? the “Codex Alimentarius” issued by the United Nations, under the pressure of the IAEA has set a norm of 1,000 becquerels per kilo in cesium 137 ; the Japanese authorities set a more protective norm of 500 becquerels per kilo, but this norm is not necessarily more protective because if we consume foods at 500 becquerels per kilo all year round, we can attain well beyond several millisieverts per year.” PAGE 8 – 9 of CRIIRAD PDF: http://www.criirad.org/actualites/dossier2011/japon_bis/en_anglais/en_conf_japon_01062011.pdf YOUTUBE: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rkcT9ScUyhY Codex Alimentarius used for bequerel limit: The Codex Alimentarius Commission http://www.codexalimentarius.net/web/index_en.jsp at its 18th Session (Geneva 1989) adopted Guideline Levels for Radionuclides in Foods Following Accidental Nuclear Contamination. The Guideline Levels which are in this publication remain applicable for one year following a nuclear accident: http://www.criirad.org/actualites/dossiers2005/menacesradioactivesaliments/codexanglais1989.pdf

Cesium attacks the HEART, because it did not exist before the atomic age, the body takes it in as KALIUM. Scientific information – analysis and discussion – about Cesium and other radionucleides – human health – by Yury Bandajevski (belarusian independent Chernobyl scientist – who was imprisoned for his work in Belarus and fled the country): http://chernobyl-today.org/images/stories/Bandajevski_2001_Radiocaesium_and_heart.pdf

Ampam man curry,which is popular for children is very contaminated. The brand is “Nagatanien”. It’s manufactured in the factory in Iwaki shi,Fukushima. No radiation check. 0.25uSv/h beside the package. http://yfrog.com/kj48gpdj

In Kawasaki,they detected 12,400Bq/kg of cesium from leaves beside a public pool. Now the pool is shut down but it has been used by 250 people a day: http://headlines.yahoo.co.jp/hl?a=20110819-00000161-yom-soci

In Tokushima,western Japan,they detected 410Bq/kg from sawdust to plant mushroom. The sawdust was from Minami soma shi. There is no “safety” limit about sawdust. They will burn the sawdust,but radioactive ash will fly to everywhere: http://nanohana.me/?p=3848 this is how Italy handled a similar case: http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5goYteynhsH7xwCovzDSezXKc7fvQ Dynamics of Cs-137 transfer ratio (TR × 10–3) for branches and wood of pine (Pinus silvestris) from 1993 to 2004 (Averin et al., 2006). page 264: http://www.strahlentelex.de/Yablokov%20Chernobyl%20book.pdf

They served cesium beef for 378 students in Fukushima,5/26/2011. http://sankei.jp.msn.com/affairs/news/110819/dst11081911560013-n1.htm

With kind regards,


Read Full Post »


Video made by me




Dr. Helen Caldicott from http://www.beyondnuclear.org speaks about the fight against atomic bombs and atomic power, about her fight against atomic bomb tests. She has 19 honorary degrees, and got the Gandhi Prize. This is her speech during the IPPNW Chernobyl / Fukushima congress, from April 8th till 10th 2011. After the speech, I gave her a copy of my movie “The Time blurs the Truth” – about Chernobyl and Belarus.


World Health Organisation ignores all Fukushima and Chernobyl children – Geneva April 26th 2011

Come to Geneva on APRIL 26th 2011: Be part: Chernobyl Peace tour through Europe April 2011



Read Full Post »

Japanese people hear it from Fukshima day One: “Panic and fear of radiation is much worse than radiation itself

This statement is used by the IAEA for Chernobyl victims.

The IAEA ignores cancer, leukemia, diabetes, trisomy 21, all kinds of illness, all kinds of cancer in connection with radiation, especially low radiation.

The IAEA calls it “Radiophobia”.

The present and future victims are perceived as a disturbance to the atomic industry, to the japanese government, to the companies running atomic plants. They are going to end it.

Since the foundation of the IAEA their purpose is: To serve and protect the atomic industry in these five countries: USA, Russia, China, France, Britain.

They also monopolized public health during and after atomic accidents, by the gag contract WHA 12-40 between them and the WHO (1959). SOURCE

Learn more about the International Atomic Energy Association:

The IAEA, WHO and TEPCO should be a case for the International Criminal Courts

Fukushima and Three Mile Island USA: strategic misinterpretation by the IAEA

Japanese officals and WHO ignore irradiated Japanese Children

IAEA and ICRP – Licence to Kill – ALARA principle

Fukushima: The IAEA strategy

Japan: Additional 252,500 Cancer Cases and Risk for pregnant women

25 Years with FUKUSHIMA

Atomic Industry – Licence to Kill


Read Full Post »


So far had a radioactivity of cesium-134 and cesium-137 have been allowed by a maximum of 600 becquerels per kilogram. Since last weekend the EU limit for food from affected areas in Japan, however, was significantly increased.

Consumer organization FoodWatch (web)and the Environment Institute Munich announced in a joint statement, that:

For example, should fish oil or spices to their previous value to twenty times higher than what corresponds to 12 500 becquerels per kilogram.

The appropriate Emergency Ordinance 297/2011 was on entered into force on March 27th 2011.

Safety standards for Japanese food has been decreased

German Federal Minister of Consumer Aigner contains important information to the public.

This is an act against the health of the people. This is not democratic.

THE E.U. TOOK IT partly BACK: http://www.foodwatch.de/kampagnen__themen/radioaktivitaet/nachrichten/kommissionsentscheidung/index_ger.html
reason: Massive protest of consumer organisations! JAPAN, you can do it also!


history says: Atomic accidents lead to higher radiation limits – which stay flexible. Flexible for incrasing the limit:

The ICRP – another profiteer of the atomic industry – made the recommendations for radiation protection norms, which were accepted by all countries, and which justified the set of regulations of the IAEA. Interesting isn’t it? Here is one:
ICRP said, the tritium emission (from atomic power plants) in water should be 40.000 Bq.

In 1990 they said: Lets make 7000 Bq/ litre.

This was proved by ACES (Comitee for environmental standards, Canada). They said: change the 7000 Bq (Because of cancer danger).

They also said: Lower it to 100 Bq in five years until you get 20 Bq / Litre.


Read Full Post »


News from April 13th 2011: Fukushima is now INES 7 – like Chernobyl. The IAEA doesn’t want that. Read here why.

The IAEA organizes propaganda conferences each year. Only those who are recommended by their country’s atomic authority are permitted to participate. Nuclear issues which are subject to criticism are excluded.
The World Health Organization (WHO) also organizes annual conferences. However, WHO is gagged by the IAEA (per Agreement WHA 12-40 of 1959) and is prohibited from independently issuing statements regarding the health effects of atomic accidents.
This means the IAEA’s engineers and physicists are given the legal right to make statements about the health impacts of atomic accidents at the same time medical doctors from the World Health Organization are legally prohibited from doing so. The IAEA’s physicists issue official statements about the biological effects of exposure to radiation or radioactive contamination; they are permitted to assess the impact of accidental exposure or releases of radioactive contamination on human health.

The IAEA has a history of denying that the following health impacts occurred as a result of exposure to radiation and radioactive contaminants: damage to the immune system, stillbirths, thyroid cancer in children, brain damage, mental retardation, trisomy 21, diabetes, fetal abnormalities, disabled children, and all kinds of cancer, illness.
Many of these illnesses occur months, years or decades after initial or continued exposure and therefore, the IAEA and WHO artificially reduce the casualty count by including only those injuries received in the first minutes, hours, days following a nuclear accident.

The proposal to bring TEPCO before the International Criminal Court (ICC) was made by German politician, Stefan Wenzel on April 9th, 2011, during the IPPNW congress in Berlin. Watch his impressive speech here (beginning at 4:08 Min.):

He also brought the following proposal to dissolve the secret relationship between the IAEA and WHO before the “Bundestag”, a federal legislative body in Germany.


The UN General Assembly adopted the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court on July 17, 1998. On July 1, 2002 the statute came into force. “The International Criminal Court is a permanent tribunal to prosecute individuals for genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes.” (Wikipedia, 03/25/2011) Thus far, the ICC has not accepted criminal or civil cases involving the destruction of natural resources and environmental terrorism. The establishment of its authority to do so is long overdue.
In relation to the ongoing accident at Fukushima, responsible officials from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the World Health Organization (WHO), the operating company (TEPCO) and Japanese nuclear power regulators should be brought before the International Criminal Court and held accountable for their actions.
Failure to aid in tens of thousands of cases and threats to natural resources hundreds of thousands if not millions of people is a Felony.
The behavior of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the World Health Organization (WHO) following the reactor accident of Fukushima is a scandal. WHO has made public statements trivializing the emergency and ceding all of its responsibilities to the IAEA, citing the treaty of 1957. “What is WHO’s role in nuclear emergencies? Answer by WHO: “Within the United Nations system, the IAEA is the lead agency for coordination of international response to radiation events.” (World Health Organization, Japan Nuclear Concerns, FAQ, 14 March 2011, Geneva)
The IAEA – an organization whose Board of Governors is dominated by and comprised almost entirely of nuclear industry members, holds fast to its opinion that Fukushima should be assessed at Level 5 on the International Rating scale for significant events in nuclear facilities (INES).
The quantity of radioactive Iodine-131 released is a central indicator for the evaluation of nuclear accidents on the INES scale. The release of more than “a few 10 ^ 16 Bq of iodine 131” is classified as a level 7 catastrophic accident this (INES) scale.
Apparently, the IAEA, TEPCO and the Japanese government officials in charge have not clearly stated how much radioactive material has been released throughout the unfolding of the Fukushima disaster. According to estimates by the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO), comprised of 60 monitoring stations world-wide under the auspices of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, the first three days of the Fukushima accident alone released about 3.8 x 10 ^ 17 Bq of radioactive Iodine-131. That is about 100 times the official inventory. The Fukushima disaster has also released significant amounts of several other radionuclides which have not even been measured.
Due to these figures, the Fukushima accident would have been legitimately classified as INES level 7 a long time ago. Greenpeace is now in the process of conducting its own analysis.
The behavior of WHO and the IAEA is therefore an unprecedented scandal. An inappropriately small evacuation zone is estimated to have resulted in the needless exposure of pregnant women, children, and other adults to excessive levels of radiation and radioactive contamination beyond 250mSv, the limit set for the recognition of work related cancer among Japanese nuclear power plant employees. Radiation biology assumes that if 10,000 people were exposed to a dose of 1 Sv, then 500 deaths are expected to occur as a result of their exposure (ICRP60) 500-1200 (BEIRV) 580-1740 (RERF), 2400 (Köhler). The ICRP – another profiteer of the atomic industry – made the recommendations for radiation protection standards, which were accepted by all countries and which were used o justify IAEA regulations. Interesting isn’t it?

Here is one:
ICRP set the original safety standard for tritium emission (from atomic power plants) in water at 40,000 Bq/litre.
In 1990 the ICRP said: Let’s lower the safety standard for tritium to 7000 Bq/ litre.
The new 7000 Bq/litre limit was approved by ACES (Committee for Environmental Standards, Canada). They agreed to change the safety limit to 7000 Bq/litre because of the cancer risk.
The ICRP later said: Let’s lower the safety standard to 100 Bq/litre every five years until we get down to 20 Bq /litre.
I think there is a big difference between ‘safety’ limits of 40,000 Bq/litre and 20 Bq/litre!
Said another way, if 40,000Bq/litre was safe, why would they ever lower the limit to 20 Bq/litre?

(thanks to Tadema for help)


Fukushima and Three Mile Island USA: strategic misinterpretation by the IAEA

Japanese officals and WHO ignore irradiated Japanese Children

IAEA and ICRP – Licence to Kill – ALARA principle

Fukushima: The IAEA strategy

Japan: Additional 252,500 Cancer Cases and Risk for pregnant women

25 Years with FUKUSHIMA

Atomic Industry – Licence to Kill


Read Full Post »


At the time of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, scientists were busy trying to figure out how many people die from atomic bombs and are incapable of fighting.

It was not about still-born children, sick adults or children suffering. Recognized losses had to stay as small as possible. (quote Rosalie Bertell, Toronto, Kanda)

Atomic power plants are an invention of the military to produce plutonium. Electricity was a waste product.

The definition of an accident is similar to what is known in Harvard as “strategic misinterpretation“. Quote of IAEA and OCDE: ““In consequence, the Chernobyl accident will be not considered as a significant accident.SOURCE

The ICRP talked in 1990 in connection with Chernobyl about “temporary effects from radiation“. Therefor ICRP admits radiation damage. The IAEA denies this.
The  ICRP leaves the field of consequences for health caused by radiation to engineers and physicists . The WHO does the same (independentwho.info)

In the case of Three Mile Island, the definition of accident refers only to the first 7 days. Everything about it falls within the definition of decontamination. But the Latency for Cesium is 20 – 25 years for mature people / 4 years children

Of these, the following doses are deducted:

The dose people at work in atomic power plants would be exposed to in normal operation.

The background radiation.

Moreover, the fallout from Chinese nuclear tests.

Excluding these values​​, and only 7 days. This is fraud.

The IAEA is undermining the right of expression and legal justice:

The IAEA recognized the judicial process to Three Mile Iceland / Harrisburg only to experts, the methodology and results consistent with those of the other “colleagues”on the same subject. The IAEA describes itself as the “colleagues”. Consequently, 11 were excluded from 12 experts from the court hearing.

Japanese officals and WHO ignore irradiated Japanese Children

IAEA and ICRP – Licence to Kill – ALARA principle

Fukushima: The IAEA strategy

Japan: Additional 252,500 Cancer Cases and Risk for pregnant women

25 Years with FUKUSHIMA

Atomic Industry – Licence to Kill


Read Full Post »

Older Posts »