Posts Tagged ‘low radiation’


Dear readers, after I’ve found Chernobyl chanterelles in german supermarkets (namely ALDI, REWE, EDEKA), I informed many facebooks communities and informed german consumer organisation foodwatch. My letter and their answer here:

I did two well visitied articles here, on my blog, along with photos, deep inside Cesium information and some footage I’ve made in Chernobyl irradiated Belarus (where the Chanterelles come from):

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Chernobyl chanterelles for sale:


WARNING: ALDI Germany sells Chernobyl irradiated chanterelles:


IAEA, UNSCEAR, ICRP, W.H.O., BEIR, officials, most common scienctists, atomic power plant operators ignore the dangers of internal low dose radiation. Learn here why: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/09/18/the-atomic-devil-strikes-again-iaea-general-conference-2011-sept-19th-23rd/

Japan allows 500 Bequerel for irradiated food. Belarus even more. NO ONE can controll all food, water, land, air. No one! They export it, they import it, they eat it, and pregnant women and children and infants! I witness it in Belarus, each year.

BELARUS: http://www.rbic.by/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=256&Itemid=86

“…To provide an adequate safety standard the dose limit of 1 mSv/y have to be reduced to 0.02 mSv/y or 20 µSv/y.”Page 9: http://www.staff.uni-marburg.de/~kunih/all-doc/stoakuni.pdf by Dr. Horst Kuni, Nuclear Medicine, University Professor.


Please sign this Petition: https://foodwatch.de/e10/e42688/e44900/

QUOTE: “Dear Commissioner Dalli, Commissioner Oettinger, Minister Aigner and Minister Röttgen,

The nuclear disasters of Chernobyl and Fukushima will have long-term impacts on human health. Food from the affected regions will be radioactively contaminated for many decades. It is the task of European policymakers to protect the health of the population as effectively as possible. The current EU-wide limits for the radioactive contamination of foodstuffs do not guarantee an adequate level of health safety.

The permissible limits are too high: there are no “safe” limits for radioactivity because any dose of radiation, no matter how small, can cause serious diseases like cancer. Therefore, as a precautionary measure, radiation limits for food must be as strict as possible. The current limits, however, are irresponsibly high and tolerate an excessive rate of illness and fatality. They accept, for no good reason, a level of radiation exposure that far exceeds the exposure permitted by the German Radiation Protection Ordinance for normally operating nuclear facilities. Sufficient quantities of foods are available from safe regions. Therefore, there is simply no justification for consuming highly contaminated products from the regions affected by Chernobyl and Fukushima.

Current permissible limits are contradictory: many other countries, including Ukraine and Belarus, which were directly affected by the Chernobyl disaster, have set much stricter limits. The outcome of these policies: foods that are too highly contaminated for sale in these countries can still be imported quite legally by EU Member States and sold within Europe.

The EU has an obligation to act: based on the European fundamental rights, European policymakershave an obligation to minimise human exposure to radiation as much as possible. This is mandated both by the precautionary principle, which is part of the primary legislation of the EU, and by the basic right to life and physical integrity.

I therefore call on you to:

  • drastically reduce permissible limits for the contamination of foodstuffs with the radionuclide cesium: from the current 370 becquerels per kilogram (or 200 becquerels per kilogram for imports from Japan) to 8 becquerels per kilogram for baby food and milk products, as well as from the current 600 becquerels per kilogram (or 500 becquerels per kilogram for imports from Japan) to 16 becquerels per kilogram for all other foods. These limits would satisfy the requirements of the German Radiation Protection Ordinance, according to which a maximum annual exposure limit of 0.3 millisieverts is permitted from each exposure pathway (i.e. for the emission of radioactive substances from nuclear power plants through air or water). The fact that any dose of radiation, no matter how small, can have serious health consequences is reason enough to question the continued operation and construction of nuclear power plants.
  • implement zero-tolerance policies for the contamination of foodstuffs with radioactive iodine-131. Given the relatively short half-life of iodine-131, people should not be expected to eat food contaminated with this isotope: many foods can be stored – or, if applicable, frozen – until the isotope has decayed and the foods have become suitable for consumption.
  • establish a uniform limit system that applies equally to normal and emergency situations. Currently the European Commission has the power to relax the limits for foodstuffs following a nuclear accident – like the recent Fukushima disaster; moreover, the EC can take such action alone, without parliamentary control. This situation must be changed.”

World Shocking Japanese Standard level – 2000 becquerel: http://kingo999.web.fc2.com/kizyun_e.html

Project 47 – a public observatory in the country’s 47 prefectures: http://www.earthspiral.jp/47pj/

the impact on marine spills of radioactive materials into the ocean by the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station – GREENPEACE JAPAN: http://www.greenpeace.org/japan/ja/earthquake

Measurement Information Center: http://sokuteiki.exblog.jp/15984034//monitoring/7th/

Project to protect the future of children from low dose exposure: http://blog.goo.ne.jp/kodomofukushima

Citizens’ Radioactivity Measuring Station CRMS put the German “foodwatch” (consumer organisation) information and petition links on their website! More on CRMS website: english: http://en.crms-jpn.com/art/137.html japanese: http://www.crms-jpn.com/art/135.html french: http://fr.crms-jpn.com/art/136.html

CRMS: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/08/16/donate-for-independent-radiation-measurements-in-japan-crms-project-47/

More background on the deadly limit which harms our children and can kill them:

The European Union imports radioactive goods from areas with a maximum of 20 Milli Sievert per Year (official) AND MORE –  that’s an equivalent of 50 (!) mammograms! FOR CHILDREN. This is dangerous and irresponsible.

So far had a radioactivity of cesium-134 and cesium-137 have been allowed by a maximum of 600 becquerels per kilogram. Since last weekend the EU limit for food from affected areas in Japan, however, was significantly increased. Consumer organization FoodWatch (web) and the Environment Institute Munich announced in a joint statement, that: For example, should fish oil or spices to their previous value to twenty times higher than what corresponds to 12 500 becquerels per kilogram.

Cesium directly harms the hearts of our children: MODIFICATIONS IN CARDIAC-VASCULAR SYSTEM OF CHILDREN, LIVING IN CONTAMINATED WITH RADIOISOTOPES: http://chernobyl-today.org/images/stories/Bandajevski_2001_Radiocaesium_and_heart.pdf

500 Bequerel per Kilogram – japanese limit IS MURDER. Why: we can rightly consider the Cesium-137 in relatively small doses (20-30 Bq/kg); a breach of the regulatory processes in the body: PAGE 2 – 3: http://chernobyl-today.org/images/stories/BANDAJEVSKI_UNSCEAR_-_REUTERS_Sept_22nd_2010_Eng_V2.pdf

more: http://chernobyl-today.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=55&Itemid=45&lang=en

The appropriate Emergency Ordinance 297/2011 was on entered into force on March 27th 2011. Safety standards for Japanese food have been decreased. German Federal Minister of Consumer Aigner contains important information to the public. This is an act against the health of the people. This is not democratic. Then, the E.U. TOOK IT partly BACK: http://www.foodwatch.de/kampagnen__themen/radioaktivitaet/nachrichten/kommissionsentscheidung/index_ger.html Here is the new one from April (see bottom on page for bequerel): http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2011:097:0020:0023:DE:PDF
reason: Massive protest of consumer organisations! JAPAN, you can do it also!


I had contact to foodwatch in 2008, when high Uranium was detected in Germany’s drinking water: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2008/09/12/uranium-in-drinking-water-solutions-made-in-germany/

Remember the scandal news of high Uranium levels in Germany’s drinking water HERE

The Consmer Protection Organisation “FOODWATCH” (web) discorvered, that of 8000 examined data 950 have more than 2 microgram of Uranium in one liter – that’s breaking the tolerance limit. Uranium in drinking water is dangerous for babies.

Adding to this: 150 data values are above the limit of 10 (!) microgram per liter. Is this still drinking water?

Worst of all: The German Authorities did not inform the German people about the Uranium in German drinking water – never did.

Only Foodwatch did it.

So, I sent them an E-Mail on August 7th 2008 regarding the shocking news of Uranium in drinking water. This was my Mail:

And this is their answer:

It took 3 (!) years for a lower Uranium limit in drinking water, but thanks to foodwatch something was done: http://www.foodwatch.de/kampagnen__themen/mineralwasser/trinkwasser/index_ger.html

quote: “From 1st November 2011 in Germany can not flow more water from the tap, which contains more than 10 micrograms of uranium per liter. This is a great step forward for consumers, because so far there was no legal limit. For years foodwatch critical values was made public and called for a limit. Babies and toddlers are so but still not sufficiently protected.”

MORE: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/09/18/the-atomic-devil-strikes-again-iaea-general-conference-2011-sept-19th-23rd/

With kind regards,



Read Full Post »


Dr. Ernest J. Sternglass (born 1923, Berlin) is an emeritus professor at the University of Pittsburgh and Director of the Radiation and Public Health Project. He is an American physicist and author, best known for his controversial research on the health risks of low-level radiation from atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons and from nuclear power plants. This is  his study “Infant Mortality Changes Following the Three Mile Island Accident,” from 1980: http://atomichistory.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/sternglass_infantmortalitytmi.pdf

Go on the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention http://wonder.cdc.gov/cmf-icd9.html click on: I Agree, do a search, 1979, 1980, PA / Pennsylvania…

11/92 interview with Dr. Ernest J. Sternglass, author of Secret Fallout: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/inetSeries/ejs1192.html

TO THREE-MILE ISLAND as a full PDF FILE: http://www.nucleardemolition.com/SF.pdf

and: sternglass fallout and sat scores evidence for cognitive damage during early infancy phi delta kappa april 1983 http://www.jstor.org/pss/20386800

No wonder the NRC staff did not want to let the public know that they knew exactly in which direction the most radioactive clouds had moved, since this information could then be used to tie any later localized rises in fetal deaths, infant mortality, and cancer to the radioactive gas clouds from Three Mile Island. SOURCE: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/SecretFallout/SFchp18.html

media bought by atomic industry: http://www.nytimes.com/1995/08/02/business/cbs-accepts-bid-by-westinghouse-5.4-billion-deal.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm

More insight:

quotes by: http://ratical.org/radiation/KillingOurOwn/KOO14.html

quote: “But the firing of Gordon MacLeod hardly ended the controversy over the health impact of the accident and how it had been handled. In November, Ernest Sternglass charged that figures from the nearby Harrisburg and Holy Spirit hospitals indicated that infant deaths there had doubled from six during February through April of 1979 to twelve in May through July. Only one infant had died at the Harrisburg Hospital in May through July of 1978; seven had died there in those same three months following the accident. The statistics seemed tragically reminiscent of the era of nuclear bomb testing. The NRC, the state, and the utility had all claimed–as had the AEC after so many atomic explosions–that radiation releases had been too small to have more than a very marginal health impact, if any at all. Sternglass asserted the authorities had failed to account for the extreme sensitivities of fetuses in utero in claiming a very marginal health impact from the accident’s releases…” Ernest Sternglass, “Infant Mortality Changes Following the Three Mile Island Accident,” presented at the 5th World Congress of Engineers and Architects, Tel Aviv, Israel, 1980

quote: “The charge that TMI had actually killed area infants provoked a storm of outrage from the government of Pennsylvania. The state responded–as it had at Shippingport six years earlier–that the official statistics Ernest Sternglass had used were, after all, inaccurate. Dr. George Tokuhata, director of the state’s Department of Epidemiological Research, said a “printing error” on the part of the U.S. Bureau of Vital Statistics had skewed the state’s infant-mortality figures. There were thus eighty-eight fewer infant deaths in Pennsylvania in the summer of 1979 than originally recorded.Sternglass, however, held his ground. Discrepancies between state and federal data are not uncommon. But this particular case seemed “suspicious.” The discrepancy in infant deaths between the two sources for the period of April 1 through June 30, 1979, had been two; from October 1 through December 31 it had also been two. For eighty-eight to surface between July 1 and September 30, precisely in the controversial summer months after the TMI accident, seemed unlikely.”
More about NRC: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/07/15/us-n-r-c-says-tritium-is-normal-reason-for-children-leukemia/

More about WHO / IAEA: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/07/19/how-the-iaea-actively-endangers-the-health-of-children/

Why low radiation (PETKAU EFFECT) is dangerous & how it works: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/03/14/low-radiation-the-petkau-effect/


Read Full Post »



What IAEA, UNSCEAR, ICRP and WHO ignore:

1927 Herman J Mueller discovered in 1927 (!) the following: ARTIFICIAL TRANSMUTATION OF THE GENE by radiation – he got the The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1946:


1928 the ICRP was founded. No coincidence: http://www.icrp.org/publication.asp?id=1928%20Recommendations

the ICRP kills 150,000 people per year with irradiated food standards: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/09/25/european-union-kills-legallly-150000-people-each-year-with-irradiated-food-in-germany/

nuclear industry is based on “eugenics” and “atomic darwinism”: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/10/01/the-atomic-darwinism/

The BIMODAL effect of low radiation on health – proven by Burlakova 1996, ignored by science and IAEA, today’s science ONLY looks for LINEAR dose effects. They use the model of HIGH radiation (acute syndrome) on LOW radiation effects (cancer, diseases, mutation – …) – result: ALL radiation victims are and latency in general ignored! Please share: http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/BurlakovaChernobyl-Belarus.pdf

Page 2: “Table 1 Incidence of 12 classes of disease among liquidators per 100 thousand people” – shows massive increase of diseases. Page 6 “relation between effects at low-intensive dosage and dose rate” and Page 11 “the PRESENCE of linear or linear-quadratic dependency IS NOT obligatory for the cases of diseases and deaths from malignant neoplasm at low doses”: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Burlakova.pdf

“Presently the international organizations (WHO, IAEA) recognize as the main cause of increase of thyroid cancer in liquidators and children population after the accident their irradiation with radioactive iodine, I-131. The rest of diseases, they suppose, are provoked by psycho-emotional reactions. ” http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Burlakova.pdf The bimodal dependence of effects on dose was
revealed for all studied parameters. Namely, effects increased at low doses, reached maximum (for low doses), then decreased (in some cases the effect sign reversed) and thereafter increased with the increase of

“What should WHO have done after Chernobyl?” asked Dr Nabarro, Acting Director-General of the World Health Organization in 2002. He received an immediate reply: Convene a “Scientific Working Group on “Ionizing Radiation and Genetics” similar to the one in 1956 but add the words “and Genomic Instability”. It was in response to this question, that the World Health Organization convened a study group in Geneva in 1956, composed of Nobel prize winner in genetics, Professor Muller, and other luminaries of international repute in the field…Together, these scientists reminded us that «the genome is the most valuable treasure of human kind. It determines the life of our descendants and the harmonious development of the future generations. As experts we confirm that the health of future generations is threatened by the expansion of the nuclear industry and the growth of the quantity of radioactive sources. We also consider the fact of appearance of new mutations observed in people to be fatal for them and for their descendants». Since then, a new area of research in genetics has opened up: genomic instability brought about, in particular, by radiation.” page 26 http://independentwho.org/media/Documents_IW/Forum_Radioprotection_English_Abstracts_IW_2012.pdf

Teratological effects and mutations through radiation – ignored by IAEA, OECD, ICRP, UNSCEAR, SCIENCE – proven by Étienne Wolff in the 1930ies: http://books.google.com/books/about/Th%C3%A8ses_pr%C3%A9sent%C3%A9es_%C3%A0_la_Facult%C3%A9_des.html?id=MQvwcQAACAAJ and: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,862623,00.html and: http://www.ijdb.ehu.es/web/paper.php?doi=041944cg&a=f

and here is another one THE PETKAU EFFECT, 1972: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/03/14/low-radiation-the-petkau-effect/



Read Full Post »


“Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields are possibly carcinogenic:
WHO has classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans, based on an increased risk for glioma, a malignant type of brain cancer, associated with wireless phone use”

FULL SOURCE: http://www.iarc.fr/en/media-centre/pr/2011/pdfs/pr208_E.pdf



Bees die of it too: http://genevalunch.com/blog/2011/05/11/all-the-buzz-bees-love-it-but-not-from-cell-phones/

Bee’s communaction = DANCING: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7ijI-g4jHg

background: http://genevalunch.com/files/2011/05/favre.pdf

http://www.bioinitiative.org/freeaccess/press_release/index.htm and http://www.bioinitiative.org/freeaccess/editors/index.htm

If the bee disappears from the surface of the earth, man would have no more than four years to live. – Albert Einstein
Radiation and WHO:

German Greens: Cancel secret gag agreement between IAEA and W.H.O.!



Read Full Post »


Video made by me




Dr. Helen Caldicott from http://www.beyondnuclear.org speaks about the fight against atomic bombs and atomic power, about her fight against atomic bomb tests. She has 19 honorary degrees, and got the Gandhi Prize. This is her speech during the IPPNW Chernobyl / Fukushima congress, from April 8th till 10th 2011. After the speech, I gave her a copy of my movie “The Time blurs the Truth” – about Chernobyl and Belarus.


World Health Organisation ignores all Fukushima and Chernobyl children – Geneva April 26th 2011

Come to Geneva on APRIL 26th 2011: Be part: Chernobyl Peace tour through Europe April 2011



Read Full Post »


Video made by me

Dr. Ian Fairlie at the IPPNW Chernobyl congress in Berlin, April 8th – 10th 2011. Fukushima is worse than Chernobyl, the technical accident will continue for 3 – 4 years, Zirkonium has been emitted. How will this end? He talks about that and the differences between Chernobyl and Fukushima. Schools which are 60 – 70 km away from Fukushima got the Yearly Dose in just one Hour! Pregnant women and the embryos are in danger.

At the end I talk and give him a copy of my movie “The Time blurs the Truth”.

Low radiation emission from atomic power plants, epspecially Tritium damages the human embryo during the 10th week of pregnancy and causes Leukaemia 3 – 4 years, after the child is born. Fairlie discusses the dangers of Chernobyl, low radiation and Fukushima.

Here is his presentation Dr. Ian Fairlie “Health Effects from Chernobyl”:

and here is my statement (in german) http://www.ibb-d.de/fileadmin/user_upload/pdf-tschernobyl-projekt/pdf-stimmen-nach/Jan_Hemmer.pdf


Read Full Post »

Japanese people hear it from Fukshima day One: “Panic and fear of radiation is much worse than radiation itself

This statement is used by the IAEA for Chernobyl victims.

The IAEA ignores cancer, leukemia, diabetes, trisomy 21, all kinds of illness, all kinds of cancer in connection with radiation, especially low radiation.

The IAEA calls it “Radiophobia”.

The present and future victims are perceived as a disturbance to the atomic industry, to the japanese government, to the companies running atomic plants. They are going to end it.

Since the foundation of the IAEA their purpose is: To serve and protect the atomic industry in these five countries: USA, Russia, China, France, Britain.

They also monopolized public health during and after atomic accidents, by the gag contract WHA 12-40 between them and the WHO (1959). SOURCE

Learn more about the International Atomic Energy Association:

The IAEA, WHO and TEPCO should be a case for the International Criminal Courts

Fukushima and Three Mile Island USA: strategic misinterpretation by the IAEA

Japanese officals and WHO ignore irradiated Japanese Children

IAEA and ICRP – Licence to Kill – ALARA principle

Fukushima: The IAEA strategy

Japan: Additional 252,500 Cancer Cases and Risk for pregnant women

25 Years with FUKUSHIMA

Atomic Industry – Licence to Kill


Read Full Post »

Older Posts »