Posted in Uncategorized, tagged 1986, 2011, 25 Jahre, Bürgerinitiative für eine Welt ohne atomare Bedrohung, Belarus, Chernobyl, Civil Society, Fukushima, Japan, june 2015, nuclear, Radiation, Rottweil on July 7, 2015 | Leave a Comment »
NOT A MELTDOWN NOT A MELT THROUGH! The violence of the explosion would have been massive, if they had not vented Reactor 2.
The pressure building up in the building destroyed it then, also in Unit 1 and Unit 2, and probably Unit 3. Info by Japanese Atomic Energy Commission JAEC, May 24th 2011, 16th meeting: March 14th 6:22 pm – 2号機全燃料 露出 = Ejection of ALL fuel from Reactor 2, 6:22pm March 14 2011:
Posted in Uncategorized, tagged 1990, 25 years of German-Belarusian Chernobyl Civil Movement June 18 till 21 - 2015, Bürgerinitiative für eine Welt ohne atomare Bedrohung, Belarus, Chernobyl, citizens' initiative for a world without nuclear threat, Civll Society, Deutschland, Germany, Japan, NGO, nuclear, nuklear, Prof. Dr. Gennady Grushevoy, Prof. Dr. Irina Grushevaya, reactor, reaktor, Rottweil, The Children of Chernobyl, weissrussland on April 27, 2015 | Leave a Comment »
Since 1990 exists a close partnership between the “citizens’ initiative for a world without nuclear threat” in Rottweil and the Belarusian Foundation “The Children of Chernobyl” in which they stand in solidarity to help remembering the Chernobyl disaster and build the energy future without nuclear energy.
There is a partnership festival from June 18 to 21 – 2015. This partnership will be held with a variety of events and with guests from Belarus and Japan.
They have supported this German-Belarusian partnership,, designed it, so we would like to celebrate it with you also.
Please book your accommodation in the hostel or the Tourist Information. http://www.rottweil.de
Info about City here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rottweil
The fund helped more than 2000.000 belarusians with concrete aid and sent more than 360,000 Chernobyl children in countries all over the world, was nominated for the peace nobel prize 2005. MORE INFO IN THESE TWO LINKS:
“Diagnoses of cancers were identified from the Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry. A two-fold higher risk for leukaemia and brain tumours was seen among children exposed to dose rates of ≥200 nSv/h compared to those exposed to .” http://www.ispm.ch/index.php?id=377&no_cache=1&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=1585
CSRP Japan: http://csrp.jp/posts/2190
-> 100 nano Sievert per hour = 0,1 micro Sievert per hour = 0,8 milli Sievert per year <-
JAPANESE TRANSLATION LINK: スイスで低線量被曝と小児ガンのリスク研究 大きな反響
This correspons perfectly to “Childhood Leukemia and Cancers Near German Nuclear Reactors” – World’s biggest 20 years Study – the KiKK Study: http://doris.bfs.de/jspui/bitstream/urn:nbn:de:0221-20100317939/4/BfS_2007_KiKK-Studie.pdf
Increase of Children leukemia around Nuclear Reactors!
Swiss Childhood Cancer Cancer and Nuclear Power Plants in Switzerland (as usual attacked by physicists BUT confirmed by physicians: the IPPNW – peace nobel prize 1985): http://www.canupis.ch/index.php?id=studydesign
20 Milli Sievert per year are allowed in Japan! http://www.ratical.org/radiation/Fukushima/FradAlarmsDrs.html
We call Victims of the Atomic Age simply “Cancer patients”. Where are our Geneticists, physicians, oncologists? Are they in a vegetative state?
“qualifying five year survival as “cure”, only considering cancer” – World Health Organisation; http://mondediplo.com/2008/04/14who
The main way in which the “radiation protection industry” has succeeded in hugely underrating the ill-health caused by nuclear power is by insisting on a group of extremely restrictive definitions as to what qualifies as a radiation-caused illness statistic. For example, under IAEA’s criteria:
> If a radiation-caused cancer is not fatal, it is not counted in the IAEA’s figures
> If a cancer is initiated by another carcenogen, but accelerated or promoted by exposure to radiation, it is not counted.
> If an auto-immune disease or any non-cancer is caused by radiation, it is not counted.
> Radiation-damaged embryos or foetuses which result in miscarriage or stillbirth do not count
> A congenitally blind, deaf or malformed child whose illnesses are are radiation-related are not included in the figures because this is not genetic damage, but rather is teratogenic, and will not be passed on later to the child’s offspring.
> Causing the genetic predisposition to breast cancer or heart disease does not count since it is not a “serious genetic disease” in the Mendelian sense.
> Even if radiation causes a fatal cancer or serious genetic disease in a live born infant, it is discounted if the estimated radiation dose is below 100 mSv [mSv= millisievert, a measurement of radiation exposure. One hundred millsievert is the equivalent in radiation of about 100 X-Rays].
> Even if radiation causes a lung cancer, it does not count if the person smokes — in fact whenever there is a possibility of another cause, radiation cannot be blamed.
> If all else fails, it is possible to claim that radiation below some designated dose does not cause cancer, and then average over the whole body the radiation dose which has actually been received by one part of the body or even organ, as for instance when radio-iodine concentrates in the thyroid. This arbitrary dilution of the dose will ensure that the 100 mSv cut-off point is nowhere near reached. It is a technique used to dismiss the sickness of Gulf War veterans who inhaled small particles of ceramic uranium which stayed in their lungs for more than two years, and in their bodies for more than eight years, irradiating and damaging cells in a particular part of the body.
quote by Dr. Rosalia Bertell, November 1999 issue of The Ecologist, pp. 408-411: http://ratical.org/radiation/NAvictims.html
21 Milli Sievert to 4 SIEVERT (4,207 mSv) per year on playground:
“Park closed due to high radiation in Ikebukuro, Tokyo:
“The government has reopened a section of National Route 6 running through part of the Hamadori region of Fukushima Prefecture” – “5.3uSv/h” ( = 46 milli SIevert per year):
“In Fukushima, the population is in an intricate situation”:
The atomic energy is everywhere – by TEPCO. But it is no needed for electricity:
Posted in Uncategorized, tagged Civil Society, court, Death, dose, Fukushima, health, Hideaki Higuchi, hot spot, Japan, mSv, nuclear, people, Radiation, reactor, Takahama, TEPCO on April 20, 2015 | Leave a Comment »
Health Ministry (!!!) attacks the people with a more than 100% increase of radiation: http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ201504180025
530 Minamisoma residents sue government over hot spot delisting: http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2015/04/17/national/crime-legal/530-minamisoma-residents-sue-government-hot-spot-delisting/#.VTUqa-Hy0ue
YOU can take part: HERE
The learned from Belarus: 1,000 areas off danger list: http://www.nbcnews.com/id/6492342/ns/us_news-environment/t/chernobyl-neighbors-ignoring-long-term-risk#.VTfJzOHy0uc
Chernobyl no longer allowed in Belarus: http://spring96.org/en/news/76869
This is about the Hot Spot regulations 特定避難勧奨地点for Minami-sôma. Around the evacuation zones with more than 20 mSv / year 132 families get 100,000 Yen per month. These families sued the officials, because the radiation remains high.
Defiant Judge Hideaki Higuchi rules and bans restarts of Takahama Reactors: http://www.evacuate-fukushima.com/2015/04/defiant-judge-hideaki-higuchi-rules-and-bans-restarts-of-takahama-reactors/
The 100 Millisievert Threshold Lie http://www.strahlentelex.de/The_100_Millisievert_Threshold_Lie_Statement_German_GSS.pdf
“it is recognized by the World Health Organization that the International Atomic Energy Agency has the primary responsibility for encouraging, assisting and coordinating research and development and practical application of atomic energy for peaceful uses throughout the world without prejudice to the right of the World Health Organization to concern itself with promoting, developing, assisting and coordinating international health work, including research, in all its aspects. ” http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/Others/inf20.shtml#note_c