Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Japan’

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

Diagnoses of cancers were identified from the Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry. A two-fold higher risk for leukaemia and brain tumours was seen among children exposed to dose rates of ≥200 nSv/h compared to those exposed to .” http://www.ispm.ch/index.php?id=377&no_cache=1&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=1585

CSRP Japan: http://csrp.jp/posts/2190

-> 100 nano Sievert per hour = 0,1 micro Sievert per hour = 0,8 milli Sievert per year <-

JAPANESE TRANSLATION LINK: スイスで低線量被曝と小児ガンのリスク研究 大きな反響

This correspons perfectly to “Childhood Leukemia and Cancers Near German Nuclear Reactors” – World’s biggest 20 years Study – the KiKK Study: http://doris.bfs.de/jspui/bitstream/urn:nbn:de:0221-20100317939/4/BfS_2007_KiKK-Studie.pdf

Increase of Children leukemia around Nuclear Reactors!

ENGLISH: http://alfred-koerblein.de/cancer/english/index.htm and: http://alfred-koerblein.de/cancer/english/index.htm

Swiss Childhood Cancer Cancer and Nuclear Power Plants in Switzerland (as usual attacked by physicists BUT confirmed by physicians: the IPPNW – peace nobel prize 1985): http://www.canupis.ch/index.php?id=studydesign

20 Milli Sievert per year are allowed in Japan! http://www.ratical.org/radiation/Fukushima/FradAlarmsDrs.html

We call Victims of the Atomic Age simply “Cancer patients”. Where are our Geneticists, physicians, oncologists? Are they in a vegetative state?

cosmosTEPCO

Safe-Murder

qualifying five year survival as “cure”, only considering cancer” – World Health Organisation; http://mondediplo.com/2008/04/14who

The main way in which the “radiation protection industry” has succeeded in hugely underrating the ill-health caused by nuclear power is by insisting on a group of extremely restrictive definitions as to what qualifies as a radiation-caused illness statistic. For example, under IAEA’s criteria:

>    If a radiation-caused cancer is not fatal, it is not counted in the IAEA’s figures

>    If a cancer is initiated by another carcenogen, but accelerated or promoted by exposure to radiation, it is not counted.

>    If an auto-immune disease or any non-cancer is caused by radiation, it is not counted.

>    Radiation-damaged embryos or foetuses which result in miscarriage or stillbirth do not count

>    A congenitally blind, deaf or malformed child whose illnesses are are radiation-related are not included in the figures because this is not genetic damage, but rather is teratogenic, and will not be passed on later to the child’s offspring.

>    Causing the genetic predisposition to breast cancer or heart disease does not count since it is not a “serious genetic disease” in the Mendelian sense.

>    Even if radiation causes a fatal cancer or serious genetic disease in a live born infant, it is discounted if the estimated radiation dose is below 100 mSv [mSv= millisievert, a measurement of radiation exposure. One hundred millsievert is the equivalent in radiation of about 100 X-Rays].

>    Even if radiation causes a lung cancer, it does not count if the person smokes — in fact whenever there is a possibility of another cause, radiation cannot be blamed.

>    If all else fails, it is possible to claim that radiation below some designated dose does not cause cancer, and then average over the whole body the radiation dose which has actually been received by one part of the body or even organ, as for instance when radio-iodine concentrates in the thyroid. This arbitrary dilution of the dose will ensure that the 100 mSv cut-off point is nowhere near reached. It is a technique used to dismiss the sickness of Gulf War veterans who inhaled small particles of ceramic uranium which stayed in their lungs for more than two years, and in their bodies for more than eight years, irradiating and damaging cells in a particular part of the body.

quote by Dr. Rosalia Bertell, November 1999 issue of The Ecologist, pp. 408-411: http://ratical.org/radiation/NAvictims.html

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

Tokyo (!):

21 Milli Sievert to 4 SIEVERT (4,207 mSv) per year on playground:

Park closed due to high radiation in Ikebukuro, Tokyo:

LINK: http://www.evacuate-fukushima.com/2015/04/park-closed-due-to-high-radiation-in-ikebukuro-tokyo/

“The government has reopened a section of National Route 6 running through part of the Hamadori region of Fukushima Prefecture” – “5.3uSv/h” ( =  46 milli SIevert per year):

LINK: http://www.evacuate-fukushima.com/2015/03/%E5%9C%B0%E7%8D%84%E3%81%AE%E6%9B%B2%E3%82%8A%E8%A7%92-road-to-hell/

“In Fukushima, the population is in an intricate situation”:

LINK: http://www.evacuate-fukushima.com/2015/04/fukushima-population-intricate-situation/

The atomic energy is everywhere – by TEPCO. But it is no needed for electricity:

Japan_monthly_electric_generation_2009_to_2014.svg

 

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

Health Ministry (!!!) attacks the people with a more than 100% increase of radiation: http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ201504180025

530 Minamisoma residents sue government over hot spot delisting: http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2015/04/17/national/crime-legal/530-minamisoma-residents-sue-government-hot-spot-delisting/#.VTUqa-Hy0ue
YOU can take part: HERE

The learned from Belarus: 1,000 areas off danger list: http://www.nbcnews.com/id/6492342/ns/us_news-environment/t/chernobyl-neighbors-ignoring-long-term-risk#.VTfJzOHy0uc

10

Chernobyl no longer allowed in Belarus: http://spring96.org/en/news/76869

This is about the Hot Spot regulations 特定避難勧奨地点for Minami-sôma. Around the evacuation zones with more than 20 mSv / year 132 families get 100,000 Yen per month. These families sued the officials, because the radiation remains high.

Defiant Judge Hideaki Higuchi rules and bans restarts of Takahama Reactors: http://www.evacuate-fukushima.com/2015/04/defiant-judge-hideaki-higuchi-rules-and-bans-restarts-of-takahama-reactors/

“A court in Fukui Prefecture, central Japan, has issued a provisional injunction blocking the restart of 2 reactors at the Takahama nuclear plant.”
NHK Apr. 14, 2015 http://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/english/news/20150414_37.html
Japan – March 12th 2015: Four utilities to decommission five aging nuclear reactors: http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ201503120041
More Info:
Contract between IAEA and Fukushima Medical Universitys (“Dr” Yamashita)
“…the IAEA will endeavour to organize conferences, seminars and workshops, in cooperation with the University, with the aim of enhancing public awareness of radiological effects on human health and addressing the issue of “radiation fear” and post-traumatic stress disorders in the Fukushima population…”
http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/energy/fukushima_2012/pdfs/fukushima_iaea_en_06.pdf

https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/06/03/fukushima-medical-unversity-accelerating-children-death/

it is recognized by the World Health Organization that the International Atomic Energy Agency has the primary responsibility for encouraging, assisting and coordinating research and development and practical application of atomic energy for peaceful uses throughout the world without prejudice to the right of the World Health Organization to concern itself with promoting, developing, assisting and coordinating international health work, including research, in all its aspects.http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/Others/inf20.shtml#note_c

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

meltfdown-lies

The most brutal kick to the face of the nuclear industry is happening right now in Japan. ALL reactors are exploded or shut down. But that is not all. This is the situation since 2011: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/may/05/japan-shuts-down-last-nuclear-reactor

It is impossible to boot the reactors again, because it is against the regulations, that WHOLE inventories / Cores are vented OUT and into the AIR to avoid a supercriticial excursion / nuclear explosion. And the officials, operators, companies, and some engineers – know it.

Reactors can be powered up again only by a lie.
The lie of the meltdown.
A meltdown creates the illusion that the inventory of nuclear reactor is sitll IN the containment or BELOW the containment.
Means: It is still contained somehow.
It sounds ridiculous, but this is the last hope of the nuclear industry.
More and more people understand this lie.
Consequences:  “A court in Fukui Prefecture, central Japan, has issued a provisional injunction blocking the restart of 2 reactors at the Takahama nuclear plant.”
NHK Apr. 14, 2015 http://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/english/news/20150414_37.html
Japan – March 12th 2015: Four utilities to decommission five aging nuclear reactors: http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ201503120041
Operating reactors is against the regulations of operating reactors, because during a big accident, they have to get rid of all the inventory to avoid an explosion.
And TEPCO Reactor 1 and 2 in Fukushima are emptied this way. There was and is NO meltdown.
nrc012 meltdown-lie01meltdown-lie02 no-restart  meltdown-fairy-tale reactor-2-ejec

More info: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2015/04/07/ventilating-or-exploding-each-reactor-architecture-must-lose-radioactive-inventory/

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

5th meeting:

Videos of the 4th meeting

Experts: http://csrp.jp/symposium2014/speakers_en

Official videos: http://csrp.jp/symposium2014/archived_videos_en

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

no-restart

“IRID SAW no fuel or water remaining in reactor core of Reactor 1″: http://fukushima-diary.com/2015/03/irid-saw-no-fuel-or-water-remaining-in-reactor-core-of-reactor-1/

meltdown-fairy-tale

Meltdown is a fixed emissivity
Usually an “1” with “18” zeros and no more: 1,850,000,000,000,000,000 Becquerel.
From this they calculate the average contamination of soils and invent radiation maps.

But a WHOLE Reactor Core consists of a 5 with 20 zeroes.

And this is not longer a meltdown. It is an ejection. All maps fake, all evac zones too small, all compensation criminal, all decontamination criminal, but it is the reality.

Japanese Reactor Restart depends on the credibility of the Meltdown fairy tale.

Supporting the meltdown theory supports the nuclear industry.

No wonder, the Science (!) ministery conceals the Radiation Data: http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ201207280073

meltdown-lie02 meltdown-lie01

Because then, all theoretical models are o.k.: Small evacuation zones, half-hearted protection measures, safety measures, low and slow compensation, fake radiation maps with “exact” numbers (thus and not otherwise style) and so on. But if you are with ME and you believe the readings of CTBTO, SPEEDI and the JAEC Data – and I never believed in any meltdown – then all this is junk! Because then at least Core 1 and Core 2 were vented and ejected into the wild! And all the models, all the studies are just textbook illusions!

Created to make us believe that the fuel is still safe somewhere “below” or “Inside” – so, that the industry can go on. Time is running out. Believe in the meltdown! Industry needs you!

Nuclear Lie by IAEA: Official (pro nuclear) IAEA data: Chernobyl released 50 million curie into the world: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/Chernobyl/Chernobyl@10p2.html

(“Radiation emission was no less that 80% of the core (with a total of 192 tons), which amounted to 6.4 x 10^9 Ci (Ci = Curie = 37,000,000,000 becquerel) If we divide the figure by the population of the whole earth (4.6 x 10^9 people) then we get 1 Ci per person.” – says Vladimir M. Chernousenko, Scientific Director of the Ukrainian Academy of Sciences  Institute of Physics in Kiev: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2014/02/09/the-future-is-on-fire/ )

But let`s take the lie of 50 million curie = 1,850,000,000,000,000,000 Becquerel (1.85e+18) released by CHERNOBYL.

1,85 1,85 1,85 1,85 1,85 1,85… Just remember this number ONE point EIGHT FIVE and the 50

let’s look at the Boiling Water Manual from GE, also for TEPCO in Fukushima:

page 73 and page 76:

Every reactor releases 50 micro curie of radioactive gases: which is 1,850,000 becquerel PER SECOND!

There is the 50 and the 1,85 again!

It’s all from the textbook!

It’s not the reality!

Can you control atoms?

>>>> A normal reactor releases 1,850,000 becquerel per second. Multiply it with x 10 = 18,500,000 becquerel – these are also the offical MAXIMUM LEVELS of radionuclide activity in the exclusion Chernobyl zone in Belarus (from the 1995 Belarus NATIONAL Report):

Again the 1,85 !

They press reality into their simulation models. Especially Chernobyl. The 50 Mio Curie are used to conceal the fact, that ALL Inventory was thrown out in 1986, thats more than 5 billion curie, not 50 million. But they use the textbook to conceal it, in order to prove that even during an explosion a reactor safe. And now these madmen build a 2nd sarcophagus around and EMPTY reactor, to even underline the 27 years old lie!

THE VENTING / EJECTION of the Reactor 2 Core stopped the Chain Reaction. The Containment works always under pressure. Just like a pressure cooker. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNTGj2i4e5A#t=2m30s
and here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dA369GWrVRo

See here, similiar accidents happened: “The explosion lifted the 6,400 pound lid up”: http://allthingsnuclear.org/fission-stories-122-monkey-business-at-point-beach/

Numo Paper (2) – sixth file:

http://www.aec.go.jp/jicst/NC/iinkai/teirei/siryo2011/siryo16/siryo2.pdf

And there it says:

March 14th 18:22 – 2号機全燃料 露出 = Ejection of ALL fuel from Reactor 2, 6:22pm March 14 2011

reactor-2-ejec

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

childrenkill-IAEA

Worldwide more boys are born – impact on demographic change?

The Study:

Total female mortality during pregnancy exceeds total male mortality. The unbiased sex ratio at conception, the increase in the sex ratio during the first trimester, and total mortality during pregnancy being greater for females are fundamental insights into early human development.”

Quote form new study of PNAS – accepted Feb 2015: http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2015/03/27/1416546112.abstract

“The most important consideration is the generally accepted value judgment that early embryonic losses are of little personal or social concern.” Dr R. Mole, 1979, a member of ICRP – The international committee which makes the dose limits WORLDWIDE ignores LIFE. http://bjr.birjournals.org/content/52/614/89

“Unexpected” findings suggest bomb tests, plant accidents boosted male births.”: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2011/06/110602-millions-fewer-girls-nuclear-radiation-births-science/

 “The gender gap in 1987 – 2007 (Chernobyl gender gap) corresponds to approximately 440 000 theoretical missing female births when only the female sex was affected. If also male births were affected at a ratio of male: female = 3:10, is the gender gap by about 790 000 (180 000 +610 000) male + female births” PAGE 32 http://www.tschernobylkongress.de/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/ScherbVoigt_fehlbildungen_fehlende_geburten.pdf

Dr, Scherb, Institute of Biomathematics and Biometry Germany: “The relative risks for stillbirth and preliminary malformations are 0,5 – 2 % per 1000 becquerel of Cesium 137 in m² soil.” Page 33http://www.tschernobylkongress.de/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/ScherbVoigt_fehlbildungen_fehlende_geburten.pdf

WHOIAEA01

Older News, but still up to date:

Millions Fewer Girls Born: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2011/06/110602-millions-fewer-girls-nuclear-radiation-births-science/

In December 2011, 9 months after Fukushima, there is also a significant deficit in the number of live births in Japan. A similar decline in birth numbers was found in February 1987 in southern Bavaria, the German region most affected by Chernobyl fallout. In Japan as well as Bavaria, the effect is limited to a single month.” http://www.strahlentelex.de/Infant_mortality_in_Japan_after_Fukushima.pdf

more: http://alfred-koerblein.de/indexengl.htm

Perinatal mortality in Germany following the Chernobyl accident: http://www.alfred-koerblein.de/chernobyl/downloads/KoKu1997.pdf and: 福島原発事故後の日本における乳児死亡率 Infant mortality in Japan

“Possible scale of lost or impaired children after Chernobyl in all of Europe and the part of Asia covered – Missing Children: 2,5 Million.” PAGE 34 http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/RIGEinEuroandCNPPc.pdf

NY TIMES 1996: “Inherited Damage Is Found In Chernobyl Area Children: changes in DNA in sperm and eggs. Such mutations are passed on from generation to generation.” http://www.nytimes.com/1996/04/25/world/inherited-damage-is-found-in-chernobyl-area-children.html

“Increased sex ratio in Bavaria: after Chernobyl and in the vicinity of NPPs – epidemiological findings”:

http://www.chernobylcongress.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/Koerblein_sexratio.pdf

VIDEOhttps://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/05/10/video-dr-hagen-scherb-less-girls-born-because-of-chernobyl-april-9th2011-part-1/

http://www.odwac.gov.on.ca/standards_review/tritium/Tritium_Radiation_Risks_Additional_Note_for_ODWAC_Fairlie.pdf – quote:Background radiation is also the primary reason why women aged over ~40 are
advised not to have children. This is because their stocks of ova have been exposed since birth to 40 or so years’ background radiation and have thereby been damaged to such an extent that an unacceptable proportion, when fertilised, results in congenital malformations, spontaneous abortions or stillbirths. Many scientists also consider that background radiation is the prime factor in the ageing process, and is ultimately the reason why we are not immortal. PAGE 5

Juri Dubrova created children DNA fingerprints and compared their data with the DNA profile of British children who had lived on non irradiated region. The results of the study: the higher the soil contamination by cesium-137, the higher the mutation rate in a genomic fragment:  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC378537/

Published in 1990 by Martin Gardner and Eve Roman, a study in which they examined the fathers of children with leukemia. They found: These fathers worked at Sellafield before “making” children and were exposed to radiation. The higher their dose was, the greater the risk was for their children to develop leukemia. Maximum: 5 mSv per year (Japan 20 mSv per year) repost: http://www.jstor.org/pss/29718787

Louise Parker in 1999 published a paper in which she examined primarily stillbirth in the “radiation workers” who work in a nuclear plant. She registered 9,208 births – among them were 130 stillbirths. The result of Parker’s study is appalling: When “producers” were irradiated 24 percent more stillbirths occured than of non-irradiated. (repost) http://www.lancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2899%2904138-0/abstract

Isn`t Immigration not a great method to mask the demographic change?
And isn`t demographic change not a great word to mask Infertility, impotence, abortions, miscarriages, stillbirths, syndromes?
And do these causes not have something to do, with the nuclear energy?
With the nuclear age?
Are the germ cells not among if not THE most sensitive cells?
Aren`t the fastest computers used for future probes?
A Modern crystal ball for the future fascism.
We are the actors. One act is one generation.
The Play is called Atomic Darwinism.
The model is evolution.

http://www.prb.org/Publications/Articles/2010/japandemography.aspx

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 90 other followers