Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘IEA’

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

From the CRMS website:

市民科学者国際会議 アーカイブ映像

講演:午前

松井英介
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/17822655

崎山比早子
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/17824364

講演:午後

セバスチャン・プフルークバイル
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/17951948

沢田昭二
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/17827015

円卓会議:

前半
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/17828447

後半
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/17829634

市民・科学者国際会議: http://www.crms-jpn.com/art/140.html

The International Conference of Citizens and Scientists: Radiation
Health Risks and Thorough Examination of the “International
Expert Symposium in Fukushima — Radiation and Health Risks”

National Olympics Memorial Youth Center, on October 12, 2011

VIDEO: http://en.crms-jpn.com/art/143.html / http://iwakamiyasumi.com/ustream-schedule/ustream2 / http://iwakamiyasumi.com/ustream-schedule/ustream4

Source: http://fr.crms-jpn.com/doc/The%20International%20Conference%20of%20Citizens%20and%20Scientists.pdf / http://en.crms-jpn.com/art/143.html

quote: “In the symposium, “scientific findings” showing low radiation doses are safe were presented in order to “address concerns with the effects of radiation” among the general public, while the “Conclusion and Recommendations” presented at the end offered no proposals or advices to minimize exposure and reduce possible disabilities. All this reminds us of what the IAEA and other UN organizations did with the International Chernobyl Project and the Chernobyl Forum about the health effect of the Chernobyl nuclear accident. The International Chernobyl Project concluded in 1991”

More: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/05/12/w-h-o-secretary-general-chan-admits-for-the-first-time-in-52-years-radiation-is-always-dangerous/ AND: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/09/18/the-atomic-devil-strikes-again-iaea-general-conference-2011-sept-19th-23rd/

and: “E. Cardis at IARC showed that cancers can significantly increase by low dose exposure, based on epidemiological results on the potential effects of external radiation exposure on cohorts of some 200 thousand workers
in the nuclear industry in 15 countries. Referring to these results, the European Committee on Radiation Risk (ECRR) objected to the ICRP risk model for underestimating “low dose internal exposure.” Meanwhile, Belarus and Ukraine epidemiological studies, which have been ignored so far by the international organizations, have reported non-cancerous lateonset disorders due to low dose exposure. They are starting to see the light of day these
years, with the publications like “Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment” (New York Academy of Sciences, 2009) and “Health Effects of Chernobyl 20 years after the reactor catastrophe” (German Affiliate of IPPNW, 2010).”

DOCUMENT: http://www.strahlentelex.de/Yablokov%20Chernobyl%20book.pdf

Background: IAEA / WHO Fukushima Symposium is Japan’s 9/11: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/09/10/this-years-911-will-be-japans-2nd-fukushima-warning/

quote: “The IAEA with it’s partners the atomic industry and military are thinking, that the public opinion is now weak enough, to blast a propaganda symposium into it and all media, along with strong pro nuclear advocats and criminals against humanity WITH: The International Expert Symposium in Fukushima – Radiation and Health Risks – September 11-12, 2011, Fukushima Medical University Their goal: Blaming the victim !”

Please support CRMS & CRIIRAD: http://en.crms-jpn.com/index.html

Or: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/08/16/donate-for-independent-radiation-measurements-in-japan-crms-project-47/

From a child in the future: “What are old persons?”

Life-Upgrade.com

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

From: “MAIN SCIENTIFIC REPORTS 1996 CHERNOBYL” – hardly a copy exists.

Download as PDF: http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/Okeanov-Chernobyl1996-Belarus.pdf

He said, that in the Minsk area the mortality among teens was higher in 1991, than in high irradiated areas. Might be right in absolute numbers, but he “forgot” one thing: Belarus began evacuating people in 1990, 4 years after the Chernobyl explosions, to Minsk. There they build a new city around the city, called “Malinovka”. So, all irradiated people are living there. They are suffering because of chronic, internal radiation, by irradiated food they ate after 1986. That’s probably the reason why the numbers are high(er) in Minsk. Tens of Thousands live in Malinova.

Dr. Okeanov attended the meeting of the Fund “For the Children of Chernobyl”, one of the first civil Chernobyl NGOs, which made the cry of the Chernobyl children public. Shortly after, Dr. Okeanov attended the IAEA Chernobyl meeting in Vienna, also in 1996. There he mentioned nothing about the data above, nothing about increaded children and teenage morbidity by Chernobyl. Instead his boss, president Lukashenko encouraged people to return to irradiated areas, in the sense of the IAEA / atomic industry. More about this scandal here: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/07/24/japan-goes-the-same-way-as-belarus-dictatorship-a-deep-insight/

Post-Chernobyl-time population inevitably decreases (picture 2) due to increase in mortality, lower birth rates and increasingly shortened life expectancy (picture 3) http://starch.narod.ru/Carnobyl.htm

Collection of Interesting Data Published in Various Documents CHERNOBYL

Tetsuji IMANAKAhttp://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/IM-data.pdf

Alla Yaroshinskaya: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/en/Novosti.html

PDF LINK HERE: http://2006.tschernobylkongress.de/ReferentInnen/Powerpoint_Okeanov.pdf

Okeanov is also mentioned here: http://www.chernobylcongress.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/fairlie.pdf page 17 and here: http://www.chernobylreport.org/torch.pdf – quote “Using data for cleanup workers from the Belarus National Cancer Registry, Okeanov et al (2004) compared baseline incidence rates for overall cancer and various cancers between 1976-85 with those between 1990-2000. An average 40% increase in
cancer incidence was observed in all regions with the most pronounced increase in the most contaminated region.” – page 55

The book “MAIN SCIENTIFIC REPORTS 1996 CHERNOBYL” was published by the Fund “For the Children of Chernobyl” based in Minsk, Belarus, in 1996. Founders: Prof. Dr. Gennady Grushevoy and Prof. Dr. Irirna Grushevaya. The Fund is opressed and prosecuted. One year before, in 1995 The Chernobyl aid-program in Belarus was stopped in PAGE 62 of this presentation : http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/NesterenkoChernobyl-Belarus.pdf and a new “pro nuclear” program replaced it: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/03/18/core-a-chernobyl-aid-program-that-kills/

Chronic Cs-137 incorporation in children’s organs – Y. I. Bandazhevsky “Schoolchildren in contaminated areas received radiologically clean food free of charge in school canteens and spent a month in a sanatorium, in a clean environment, each year. For reasons of economy the annual sanatorium stay has been shortened, and communities in some contaminated areas have been classified as “clean”, thus ending the supply of clean food from the state.”: http://www.smw.ch/docs/pdf200x/2003/35/smw-10226.PDF – just like in JAPAN NOW: www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aq4JG9ULVNE

A national cancer registry to assess trends after the Chernobyl accident http://www.smw.ch/docs/pdf200x/2004/43/smw-10221.pdf

About the Fund: http://www.civilsoc.org/nisorgs/belarus/chornbel.htm – The Fund sent more than 300,000 Chernobyl Children from Belarus for Recreation Stays into Countries all over the world, and helped 2000,000 belarusian people – this might be one reason why the officials, the belarusian government and it’s authoritarian ruler president Lukashenko is after them. They have to move from house to house, because they lose their legal address – one of many strategies of attrition of Belarusian state.

Book by the Fund: http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/BelarusianFundForTheChildrenOfChernobyl1996.pdf

This is Prof. Dr. Irina Grushevaya speaking at the German Government, on April 13th 2011: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/04/16/video-prof-dr-irina-grushevaya-on-chernobyl-fukushima-belarus-april-13th-2011-berlin/ She adressed the belarusian, totalitarian state and it’s brutality against free speech and even free thinking.

My video about them:

facebook profile of Prof. Dr. Irina Grushevaya (nominated for the alternative peace nobel prize): http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1617936134

More about Chernobyl / Fukushima – morbidity: http://www.strahlentelex.de/Yablokov%20Chernobyl%20book.pdf

German KiKK Study: Higher Cancer Risc next to Atomic Power Plants & unofficial Belarussian Children Cancer data: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2007/12/17/german-kikk-study-higher-cancer-risc-next-to-atomic-power-plants-unofficial-belarussian-children-cancer-data/

With kind regards,

Life-Upgrade.com

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

drosdova-chernobyl

55th IAEA General Conference http://www-ns.iaea.org/meetings/gc-2011.asp

IAEA Nuclear Safety and Security Programme – Monday 19 September – Friday 23 September 2011

First there was the anti human pro nuclear Fukushima Symposium: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/09/10/this-years-911-will-be-japans-2nd-fukushima-warning/

quote by Dr. Rosalia Bertell, November 1999 issue of The Ecologist, pp. 408-411: http://ratical.org/radiation/NAvictims.html

The main way in which the “radiation protection industry” has succeeded in hugely underrating the ill-health caused by nuclear power is by insisting on a group of extremely restrictive definitions as to what qualifies as a radiation-caused illness statistic. For example, under IAEA’s criteria:

>    If a radiation-caused cancer is not fatal, it is not counted in the IAEA’s figures

>    If a cancer is initiated by another carcenogen, but accelerated or promoted by exposure to radiation, it is not counted.

>    If an auto-immune disease or any non-cancer is caused by radiation, it is not counted.

>    Radiation-damaged embryos or foetuses which result in miscarriage or stillbirth do not count

>    A congenitally blind, deaf or malformed child whose illnesses are are radiation-related are not included in the figures because this is not genetic damage, but rather is teratogenic, and will not be passed on later to the child’s offspring.

>    Causing the genetic predisposition to breast cancer or heart disease does not count since it is not a “serious genetic disease” in the Mendelian sense.

>    Even if radiation causes a fatal cancer or serious genetic disease in a live born infant, it is discounted if the estimated radiation dose is below 100 mSv [mSv= millisievert, a measurement of radiation exposure. One hundred millsievert is the equivalent in radiation of about 100 X-Rays].

>    Even if radiation causes a lung cancer, it does not count if the person smokes — in fact whenever there is a possibility of another cause, radiation cannot be blamed.

>    If all else fails, it is possible to claim that radiation below some designated dose does not cause cancer, and then average over the whole body the radiation dose which has actually been received by one part of the body or even organ, as for instance when radio-iodine concentrates in the thyroid. This arbitrary dilution of the dose will ensure that the 100 mSv cut-off point is nowhere near reached. It is a technique used to dismiss the sickness of Gulf War veterans who inhaled small particles of ceramic uranium which stayed in their lungs for more than two years, and in their bodies for more than eight years, irradiating and damaging cells in a particular part of the body.

I want to see the IAEA before the ICC. The International Criminal Court. For mass murderer, with weapons of mass destruction and it’s invisible war – you can not touch, feel, hear, smell, see.

According to the WHO: a patient who survived cancer five years counts as cured: http://mondediplo.com/2008/04/14who quote ” ending studies after 10 years thereby excluding long term morbidity and mortality; qualifying five year survival as “cure”, only considering cancer” According to the IPPNW the Latency of strontium 90 and cesium-137 is 20 – 25 years. Cancer can be triggered by low-level radiation, but needs up to 40 years or more to develop. The burden of proof is always on the victim. It may be a deliberate causation of diseases: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/04/16/world-health-organisation-ignores-all-fukushima-and-chernobyl-children-geneva-april-26th-2011/

The BIMODAL effect of low radiation on health – proven by Burlakova 1996, ignored by science and IAEA, today’s science ONLY looks for LINEAR dose effects. They use the model of HIGH radiation (acute syndrome) on LOW radiation effects (cancer, diseases, mutation – …) – result: ALL radiation victims are and latency in general ignored! Please share: http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/BurlakovaChernobyl-Belarus.pdf

1927 Herman J Mueller discovered in 1927 (!) the following: ARTIFICIAL TRANSMUTATION OF THE GENE by radiation – he got the The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1946 for this! http://www.esp.org/foundations/genetics/classical/holdings/m/hjm-1927a.pdf

Teratological effects and mutations through radiation – ignored by IAEA, OECD, ICRP, UNSCEAR, SCIENCE – proven by Étienne Wolff in the 1930ies: http://books.google.com/books/about/Th%C3%A8ses_pr%C3%A9sent%C3%A9es_%C3%A0_la_Facult%C3%A9_des.html?id=MQvwcQAACAAJ and: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,862623,00.html and: http://www.ijdb.ehu.es/web/paper.php?doi=041944cg&a=f

Discovered by Abraham Petkau, 1972, Whitshell at the Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (web).

His study: http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/v71-196

He discovered:

that 26 RAD per Minute (fast radiation rate) need a total dose of 3500 RAD to harm a cell membrane.

with 0,001 RAD per Minute (slow dose) only 0,7 RAD are needed to harm a cell membrane.

The Mechanism behind it:

The production of free radicals of Oxygen (O² with a negative electric charge) caused by ionising effect of the radiation.

The free radicals caused by the slow dose (0,001) are sparsely distributed radicals do have a higher chance to reach the cell membranes.

Why:

The free radicals of the fast radiation rate (26) are tight together and so they react faster with each other.

The low electric charge of the cell membranes attract the free radicals in the early state of the reaction (minor total dose).

But WE can change history. One year remaining: The 20th IPPNW World Congress will be held in Hiroshima, Japan Medical Student Congress: August 22 and 23 (Wednesday and Thursday) Main Congress: August 24 – 26 (Friday to Sunday) : http://ippnw2012.org/

Health Physicist and Nuclear Consultant Question the Role of ICRP, IAEA and WHO at Upcoming Fukushima: http://fukushima.greenaction-japan.org/2011/09/10/health-physicist-and-nuclear-consultant-question-the-role-of-icrp-iaea-and-who-at-upcoming-fukushima-symposium/

Fukushima Citizens Challenge Symposium on Radiation and Health Risks – Hold Press Conference at Foreign Correspondents’ Club of Japan: http://fukushima.greenaction-japan.org/2011/09/09/materials-distributed-or-referred-to-at-the-fccj-press-conference/

They said 100 Milli Sievert per Year is safe (equivalent of 250 mammograms FOR CHILDREN!). At the moment 20 Milli Sievert per Year are legal. A french lab requires a reduction from 20 to 10 mSv per year: http://www.tdg.ch/actu/monde/fukushima-chiffres-enfants-contamines-doivent-revus-hausse-2011-09-07 – more: http://www.acro.eu.org/youkoso.html And: “…To provide an adequate safety standard the dose limit of 1 mSv/y have to be reduced to 0.02 mSv/y or 20 µSv/y.”Page 9: http://www.staff.uni-marburg.de/~kunih/all-doc/stoakuni.pdf by Dr. Horst Kuni, Nuclear Medicine, University Professor. Prolonged incorporation of radioisotope in the organism more than 30 Bq/kg is very undesirable, because could lead to the serious consequences: structural and metabolic alterations, energetic deficit, impairment of their functions, death, cell’s poison, cardiomyopathy, cardiac rhythm disturbance, and contraction function of myocardium, spasm of peripheral vessels – Page 26: http://www.chernobyl-today.org/images/stories/Bandajevski_2001_Radiocaesium_and_heart.pdf

Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology says 3.8 microsieverts per hour or o.k., that’s more than 33 millisieverts (mSv) per year. For children, kindergartens, nursery, primary and junior high schools. Radiation and how it destroys Health is NOT the problem. Murder is not the problem. The problem is: The economy is loosing money: http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/14/us-japan-nuclear-idUSTRE77B1RL20110814

Dr. Shunichi Yamashita (aka Mr. 100mSv), will be the recipient of Asahi Cancer Award for his “contribution” to radiation medicine. He is one of the two advisors for Fukushima Prefecture after the accident to “educate” Fukushima residents on radiation safety. He repeatedly “educated” residents that radiation exposure dose of 100mSv is SAFE. Lots of parents in Japan are upset about this announcement: http://www.asahi.com/national/update/0831/TKY201108310495.html Info by http://www.facebook.com/americaiminvisa

CHERNOBYL: “…Not until 2016, at the earliest, will be known the full number of those likely to develop serious medical conditions” because of delayed reactions to radiation exposure – QUOTE former U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/Chernobyl/042500.html

Radiation particles, directly hit the protoplasm and not the nucleus. they leave behind damage, which is only noticeable when these cells divide again. So instabilities occur in the chromosomes, the genes and genetic information. Instabilities that are not visible in the first, but especially in the second and third generation increase disease susceptibility: http://www.independentwho.info/Presse_ecrite/09_05_27_Salzburger_DE.pdf

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xL3MiDEtrA At Minute 11:21: The Government wants the people to return to Fukushima! Like it happened in Chernobyl areas in Belarus: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/07/24/japan-goes-the-same-way-as-belarus-dictatorship-a-deep-insight/

Internal irradiation happens when radioactive material is ingested into the body (…) Inhaling even the tiniest particle, that’s the danger. making comparisons with X-rays and CT scans has no meaning. Because you can breathe in radioactive material… http://www.independentwho.info/Presse_ecrite/11_03_28_TakashiHirose_EN.pdf

But the most scientific and ehtic dose limit for MAN MADE radiation is ZERO– because of the human embryo:

All recommendations for radiation emssion out of atomic power plants are based on a healthy mature 34 / 35 year old human.

This is called REFERENCE MAN

But what happens if you do not take a mature human as a default for limit values.

What if you choose a HUMAN EMBRYO

The answer is ZERO. This is called REFERENCE EMBRYO.

No One Escapes Harm: The Essential Story of In-Utero Irradiation http://ratical.org/radiation/CNR/No1Escapes.html

Confirmation that Ionizing Radiation Can Induce Genomic Instability: What is Genomic Instability: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/GenomicInst.html

MORE: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/08/03/safe-radiation-levels-never-get-your-facts-here/

The IAEA advises atomic states, is the PR agency for the atomic miliatry and industry, reports to the security council and has the five VETO powers of the U.N. as members. They want to blame the radiation victims, because of their fear of radiation – called RADIOPHOBIA by the IAEA: Japan officials are going to call radiation measurements illegal and that they are disturbing the industry. Health plays no role. They are adapting the IAEA ideology of Radiophobia: The fear of radiation is worse than the radiation. And the declining birth rates among belarusians under the age of 30 – declared by the IAEA with “Radiophobia”: http://www.iaea.org/inis/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/28/073/28073803.pdf – quote “2. PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACTS OF NUCLEAR ACCIDENTS : Soon after the discovery of ionizing radiation, it was realized that radiation could harmfully affect skin tissues, body organs and the human body as a whole beside the genetic effects. Lately after the drop of the first atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki and also after Three-Miles-Island and Chernobyl accidents anew phenomenon described as RADIOPHOBIA have become apparent and widely spread..” PAGE 338.

Teratological effects and mutations through radiation – ignored by IAEA, OECD, ICRP, UNSCEAR, SCIENCE – proven by Étienne Wolff in the 1930ies: http://books.google.com/books/about/Th%C3%A8ses_pr%C3%A9sent%C3%A9es_%C3%A0_la_Facult%C3%A9_des.html?id=MQvwcQAACAAJ and: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,862623,00.html and: http://www.ijdb.ehu.es/web/paper.php?doi=041944cg&a=f

Insects and their fast mutagenic “reaction” on low radiation are some kind of early warning system for us humans: Irradiated Insects in Japan: http://www.freeml.com/bl/8694840/25149/ normal insects soon only in the laboratory: http://www.wissenskunst.ch/en/tschernobyl.htm Great book about mutagentic impact on insects worldwide: http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/3908247314/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=thtefi-21&linkCode=as2&camp=1634&creative=6738&creativeASIN=3908247314 Reduced abundance of insects and spiders linked to radiation at Chernobyl: http://cricket.biol.sc.edu/chernobyl/papers/moller-mousseau-biol-letters-09.pdf please have a look at this beautiful book – in english: http://radionucleide.free.fr/Stresseurs/fulltext_punaise.pdf and in german: http://www.sensigns.ch/db/daten/dokumente/Heteroptera_Deutsch.pdf

More about IAEA and WHO on: http://www.independentwho.info / http://www.independentwho.info/Presse_ecrite/11_03_28_TakashiHirose_EN.pdf

WHO and IAEA ignore all irradiated children: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/03/19/effect-of-cesium-and-strontium-on-japanese-children-japanese-officals-irresponsible/

“What’s worse, the IAEA is going public these days with statements ridiculing the so called “radiophobia” of the population and calling for an end of aid programs, which, according to the IAEA report of 2005, only serve to instil a victim mentality in a totally healthy population – a claim not only cynical, but potentially dangerous for the health of the affected population.” Source: http://www.ippnw-students.org/chernobyl/coverup.html

In contrast:

Intelligence and Brain Damage in Children Acutely Irradiated in Utero. As a Result of the Chernobyl Accident – Department of Neurology, Institute for Clinical Radiology, Research Centre for Radiation Medicine of Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, WHO Collaborative Centre: nyagu@vent.kiev.ua http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr79/kr79pdf/Nyagu.pdf HEALTH OF SURVIVORS IN UKRAINE IN 25-YEARS
DYNAMICS AFTER THE CHERNOBYL CATASTROPHE : http://www.tschernobylkongress.de/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/nyagu.pdf

In 1985, a year before the disaster, 200 cases of malformations were recorded. In 2000, over 800 cases, however, despite a substantial decline in births: currently 14 to 15 000 births / year, against 28 to 30 000 before the Chernobyl disaster! http://www.dissident-media.org/infonucleaire/trait_25_26.html

New Book Concludes – Chernobyl death toll: 985,000, mostly from cancer – by Prof. Karl Grossman: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=20908

CHERNOBYL DEATHS :

4,000 deaths (in 90 years. Belarus, Ukraine, European part Russia) according to IAEA / WHO – press paper Chernobyl forum 2005

8,930 deaths (in 90 years. Belarus, Ukraine, European part Russia) according to Chernobyl forum 2005

7,400 deaths (Whole world for 50 years) according to Anspaugh et al., 1988

30,000 deaths (Whole world for 50 years) according to Goldman, 1987

18,000 (8,000 – 32,000) deaths (Europe, 1986 – 2065  without Thyroid cancer) according to Cardis et al., 2006

30,000 – 60,000 deaths (Whole world. About the entire period) according to Fairley, Sumner,2006

117,000 (37,000 – 181,000) deaths (Whole world. in the period 1986 – 2056) according to Malko, 2010

317,000 – 475,000 (495,000 with Leukemia) deaths (Whole world. About the whole period. only radiocesium) according to Hofman,1994

899,000 – 1,786 000 deaths (Whole world. About the entire period. only radionuclides) according to Bertell,2006

How does the IAEA think? Well, since the 1950ies science only looks for linear dose-effect correlation, when studying Low-Dose Radiation effects on health. – SOURCE: http://www.strahlentelex.de/Yablokov%20Chernobyl%20book.pdf

The IAEA is unscientific and unethic. They ignore the bimodal effect of low radiation.

“Presently the international organizations (WHO, IAEA) recognize as the main cause of increase of thyroid cancer in liquidators and children population after the accident their irradiation with radioactive iodine, I-131. The rest of diseases, they suppose, are provoked by psycho-emotional reactions..” (!!!…RADIOPHOBIA…!!!) There is no linear dose effect correlation, but “The bimodal dependence of effects on dose was revealed for all studied parameters. Namely, effects increased at low doses, reached maximum (for low doses), then decreased (in some cases the effect sign reversed) and thereafter increased with the increase of dosage”: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Burlakova.pdf IGNORED BY IAEA, UNSCEAR, ICRP, WHO

Swiss Childhood Cancer Cancer and Nuclear Power Plants in Switzerland (as usual attacked by physicists BUT confirmed by physicians: the IPPNW – peace nobel prize 1985): http://www.canupis.ch/index.php?id=studydesign

german kikk https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2007/12/17/german-kikk-study-higher-cancer-risc-next-to-atomic-power-plants-unofficial-belarussian-children-cancer-data/

This is in contrast to the lies of the IAEA, WHO, UNSCEAR, ICRP and OECD: “Chernobyl to the déjà dix. Impact radiologique et sanitaire. OCDE Paris, November 1995″ This report however was prepared by a French team of experts led by Dr. Henri Métiver by the French Institute for Radiation Protection and Safety (IPSN) today IRSN. It basically says: “Very extensive medical studies have shown that to the influence of radiation no anomaly in the field of health can be attributed.” and: “In consequence, the Chernobyl accident will be not considered as a significant accident.”: European OECD ignoring Chernobyl birth defects, sickness and deaths – quote “There are no clear trends in data for birth anomalies in Belarus or Ukraine”: http://www.oecd-nea.org/rp/chernobyl/chernobyl-1995.pdf

Chernobyl: Development failures in the NEWBORN: http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/Lazyuk-ChernobylBelarus.pdf  According to Michel Fernex (former WHO, Switzerland) The IAEA said in 1996: “Because there was no register in Belarus for malformations BEFORE Chernobyl, there are no abnormalities.” A LIE, not logic, unethic and unsicentific.

Results of Long-term Genetic Monitoring of Animal Populations Chronically
Irradiated in the Radiocontaminated Areas http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Goncharova.pdf

Incidence of Obligatory Registered Malformations in Belarus for 1982 to 1995 (per 1000 neonates) PAGE 3: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Lazjuk.pdf

Social Aspects of the Chernobyl Activity in Belarus http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Malko3.pdf

About the World Health Organisation and the International Atomic Energy Association and their dirty game: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xd1g3c_day-after-day_news#from=embed

The IAEA promotes the causes of cancer (atomic industry) and battles cancer at the same time: http://cancer.iaea.org/newsstory.asp?id=94

To conduct epidemiological research to determine differences and similarities (like increased infant mortality) you have to compare irradiated people and control groups. However, because radiation by Fukushima and Chernobyl is everywhere, there will soon no longer a control group. The artificial radiation becomes morbid and fatal normality.  Childhood cancer and low radiation emissions from atomic power plants: http://www.strahlentelex.de/FairlieJEnvironScienceHealth2010.pdf

Tritium H³ – according to IAEA and NRC: “No problem” (http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/grndwtr-contam-tritium.html) Mewissen at IAEA (!) symposium 1979 and BotAS 1984: “unusual cancer after 25 generations”: http://books.google.de/books?id=3gUAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA56&lpg=PA56#v=onepage&q=mewissen%20fo-cuses%20on%2025&f=false “But tritium can be deadly (…) However tritium behaves chemically and biochemically like ordinary hydrogen. When ingested, it can incorporate itself into all forms of body cells, including those of the reproductive system…” Source: http://ratical.org/radiation/KillingOurOwn/KOO10.html Here is the 1984 Tritium Warning: http://books.google.de/books?id=3gUAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA56&lpg=PA56#v=onepage&q&f=false

Nuclear energy is the art of killing cleanly and slowly, but to cover up the evidence. Potassium is confused with cesium. Strontium is confused with calcium, radio-iodine with iodine, tritium with hydrogen. Nuclear energy was invented with this in mind I suppose. First there was the atomic bomb, which kills acute. But nuclear energy turned out to be more profitable and less noticeable. More grotesque it was labeled as the “peaceful atom”. No one has so much power. When a military is planning a war, then they calculate civilian victims, so-called collateral damage. The Invisible War by nuclear reactors works well. In order to achieve objectives (profit, power, sterility of the people), our children are the collateral damage. One thinks about us. The nuclear fission in an Atomic plant or an Abomb is a permanent accident, because a) atoms are extra split, by “human hands” b) lethal fission products are created, most of which (Pu, Sr90, Cs137, I131) did not exist before the atomic age. Atomic Industry is the biggest mass murderer of all time. It’s slow. Peaceful. Clean. For endless generations. Even after the half-lifes are gone. Programmed in DNA.


The international radiation community supported the
Soviet authorities in their attempts to play down the
radiological consequences of the Chernobyl accident
for a long time. – PAGE 11: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Malko1.pdf

1986 is like 2011: Alla Yaroshinskaya “The big lie – The secret Chernobyl documents”: http://www.eurozine.com/articles/2006-04-21-yaroshinskaya-en.html “Chernobyl is a word we would all like to erase from our memory,” said UN secretary general Kofi Annan in a foreword to the report. “But,” he added, “more than 7 million of our fellow human beings do not have the luxury of forgetting. They are still suffering, every day, as a result of what happened.” The exact number of Chernobyl victims may never be known, he said, but 3 million children require treatment and “many will die prematurely” – in contrast, W.H.O. plays down Chernobyl: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2005/pr38/en/index.html REASON: http://mondediplo.com/2008/04/14who

And they are working on NEW weapons, which also kill peaceful and clean. Without smell, color, taste, noise: It seems that the so highly praised TRANSMUTATION is an instrument to revive the dangerous Plutonium fast breeder reactors – MOX – also at Fukushima: http://www.inr.kit.edu/english/264.php Partners of the project: http://www.nurisp.eu/www/nurisp/index.php?art=37

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

Sept. 18th 2011: French and German cooperative demonstration against junk reactor “Fessenheim“: http://www.swr.de/nachrichten/bw/-/id=1622/nid=1622/did=8619484/z2jt4r/index.html

Siemens to quit nuclear industry: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-14963575

365 DAYS NONSTOP anti atomic waste disposal DEMONSTRATION has begun in Germany: http://www.ndr.de/fernsehen/sendungen/hallo_niedersachsen/media/hallonds4815.html

Countess of Bernstorff is a private applicant against the atomic waste disposal “Gorleben” (german federal state Niedersachsen)- together with belarusian youths (most Chernobyl affected country): PART 1: http://www.youtube.com/wat​ch?v=p1CjNRboO-A PART 2: http://www.youtube.com/wat​ch?v=KFs3Zglz1Nw

German anti nuclear poetry festival: http://www.erlanger-poetenfest-atomfrei.de/

Reactors identical to Fukushima in Europe – MAP: http://maps.google.at/maps/ms?msa=0&msid=212731046368592544065.000474b3dbfa178d4a444&hl=de&ie=UTF8&t=h&source=embed&ll=50.226142,14.447623&spn=22.024779,40.291157

Anti Atomic Protests in Belgium and France announced: http://www.neues-deutschland.de/artikel/204340.akw-gegner-international-vernetzt.html

Swiss atomic reactor “Mühleberg” – Another Brick in the Wall: Wall penetrating cracks in the core shroud: http://angelisansichten.ch/?p=2705

Like in Austria: Nuclear phase-out in the Basic Law for Germany: http://www.sfv.de/artikel/opposition_fuer_atomausstieg_im_grundgesetz.htm

German studies & research: Altered Birth Sex Odds and Sex Odds Ratios around atomic reactors and disposals: http://www.helmholtz-muenchen.de/ibb/homepage/hagen.scherb/proceedings.html

Atomic power plant Philippsburg II has a problem with the emergency cooling system. On August8th 2011, a door is could not be closed in a cooling system, the environment ministry said in City of Stuttgart on Thursday. Operator: EnBW. Another so-called reportable event was three days earlier: During a “test for the transport” a container with fuel rods fell down: https://www.berlinonline.de/berliner-zeitung/politik/detail_dpa_31884076.php

Faulty switch in the German reactor Brokdorf: http://www.shz.de/nachrichten/top-thema/article//neue-panne-im-atomkraftwerk-brokdorf.html#CommentStart

German atomic reactor “Brokdorf” on Sunday was unexpectedly shut down. By triggering of circuit breakers, there had been an automatic shutdown of the generator transformers, said the Justice Ministry in City “Kiel”. “Independent” experts should collect oil samples and gas samples from the transformers and evaluate them. The nuclear power plant went back to the grid in mid July, after one-month maintenance: http://www.derwesten.de/nachrichten/panorama/Atomkraftwerk-Brokdorf-nach-Zwischenfall-runtergefahren-id4939158.html Original footage of overwhelmed Brokdorf staff (operator E.ON): http://www.youtube.com/wat​ch?v=GzDpG9rBs2Y They didn’t know what to do! Watch from MINUTE 00:52 on, when the alarm sounds.

Rubble with traces of radioactivity left by mistake the site of the nuclear power plant of Bugey “very low traces of artificial radioactivity,” quote EdF: http://www.lemonde.fr/planete/article/2011/08/10/des-gravats-radioactifs-quittent-par-erreur-la-centrale-nucleaire-du-bugey_1558315_3244.html

with kind regards,

Life-Upgrade.com

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

THE ATOM FORTRESS

SECOND STATUS REPORT OF THE IIASA PROJECT ON ENERGY SYSTEMS 1975:

http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Admin/PUB/Documents/RR-76-001.pdf

Quote page 27: “The idea is to install large-scale nuclear power there on the basis of the breeder principle (…) This would allow for the meaningful harvesting of uranium from the sea waters of the passing ocean current (…)

AND page 240: A WASTE DISPOSAL for RADIOACTIVE WASTE: “Scale view of Canton “Energy Island” with its presumed geological structure. The full lines under the power station barges represent permanent, drilled radioactive waste sink holes, and the dashed extensions the free trajectories of the sinking capsules.”

MORE:  http://www.cge.uevora.pt/energia/marchetti/Fire3.doc

page 15 quote: “In 1973 I was invited in Japan (…) Since the oceans contain 4.5 billion tons of uranium and their waters turns up at a rate of about one meter per year, simple estimates show that one can go flat for ten thousand years. The Japanese were fascinated by this energetic independence (…).”

The authorCesare Marchetti” was closest staff to Wolf Häfele – a german Swabian pastor’s son, Physicist, advocate of fast breeder technology – AND RESPONSIBLE FOR: The invention of trivialization of nuclear accidents: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/05/22/the-invention-of-trivialization-of-nuclear-accidents-made-in-germany-1975/

thousand men were needed for each island. The fuel from the ocean and prepared in breeder reactors would have been transported to the countries of the world by ship (max. 300,000 tons).

A crazed action. characteristic are the words “soon / almost / in preparation / almost hardly likely / except for a small percentage / in preparation / if / however / no immediate risk / residual risk

This is atomic science, atomic industry. A complete failure.

Life-Upgrade.com

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

One link: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/

massive information overload.

regards,

Life-Upgrade.com

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) was replaced by: As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP): To satisfy the ALARP principle, measures necessary to reduce risk must be taken until or unless the cost of those measures, whether money, time or trouble is disproportionate to the reduction in risk.” PAGE 170 – by UK Departement of Energy & Climatechange – QUOTE:

http://www.decc.gov.uk/assets/decc/11/meeting-energy-demand/consents-planning/nps2011/1925-appl-of-sust-of-revised-draft-en6.pdf

basically: Money over Health – a licence to kill. In the beginning the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle was turned against the atomic industry. It said, that radiation exposure has to be held as low as possible, that means as low as rasonably achievable. But hydrogen bombs cause much radiation.The ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection) turned around this principle (after the first hydrogen bomb explosion in 1954) – so that the ALARA principle is now working FOR the atomic industry, even if a reactor crashes next to you. ICRP said, that ALARA does not refer to accidents. Basically this means:

When an accident happens (an atomic reactor crash, for example) the whole point of Status Quo is that the people are contaminated with radiation.

They can irradiate you and do not compensate you – and if they do, they do it with your money. No reactor is assured, mind you.

Used in Belarus (Most Chernobyl affected country in the world) and Japan (Fukushima).

EXELON nuclear (US company) talking about ALARA:  http://www.decc.gov.uk/ass​ets/decc/11/meeting-energy​-demand/consents-planning/​nps2011/1925-appl-of-sust-​of-revised-draft-en6.pdf

Remember: This is the only VALID and OFFICIAL angenda for compensation during an atomic accident!

 

regards,

Life-Upgrade.com

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »