Geneva, Aprl 26th 2016, infront of the World Health Organisation. Signs and action during the hippocratic vigil: http://www.independentwho.org
“it is recognized by the World Health Organization that the International Atomic Energy Agency has the primary responsibility for encouraging, assisting and coordinating research and development and practical application of atomic energy for peaceful uses throughout the world without prejudice to the right of the World Health Organization to concern itself with promoting, developing, assisting and coordinating international health work, including research, in all its aspects. ” http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/Others/inf20.shtml#note_c
2012 IAEA annual budget: € 331 million – enough to buy the United Nations.
How the UN works: “know thine enemy” or at least who it is:
“By mid 1998 first draft of the Guidelines was circulating between IAEA and WHO at the management level.“
“Although there had been a clear agreement between the two organisations at the management level and the work had taken place openly the IAEA withdrew at that stage strongly advising that the whole issue should either be dropped or revised. The issue was the proposal to lower the action level for implementation from 100mGy to 10mGy dose to the thyroid’s of children.”
“Managerial level of IAEA refuses to endorse the report and refuses to endorse the report but WHO publishes Guidelines in 1999 but IAEA describes them as “DRAFT” and WHO Geneva agrees”
– Only summaries of the protocols have been published, 12 of a few hundreds.
– Every study, every statement or action by the WHO, if in connection with radioactivity and health, must be authorized by the IAEA
– The IAEA has no mandate for this. The IAEA has no mandate for reactor safety or human health.
– The IAEA is not contracted by the UN to organize relief efforts for nuclear accidents.
– 1991: Rather than examine genetic defects due to Chernobyl, the WHO examined Caries in the Chernobyl affected countries
– Behind the IAEA is the military-industrial complex
The IAEA is the spokesman of the five permanent members of the U.N.: China, USA, France, England, Russia – all atomic weapons countries. All with VETOs infront of the U.N. Vetos against all Chernobyl studies.
The UN General Assembly adopted the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court on July 17, 1998. On July 1, 2002 the statute came into force. “The International Criminal Court is a permanent tribunal to prosecute individuals for genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes.” (Wikipedia, 03/25/2011) Thus far, the ICC has not accepted criminal or civil cases involving the destruction of natural resources and environmental terrorism. The establishment of its authority to do so is long overdue.
In relation to the ongoing accident at Fukushima, responsible officials from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the World Health Organization (WHO), the operating company (TEPCO) and Japanese nuclear power regulators should be brought before the International Criminal Court and held accountable for their actions.
Failure to aid in tens of thousands of cases and threats to natural resources hundreds of thousands if not millions of people is a Felony.
The behavior of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the World Health Organization (WHO) following the reactor accident of Fukushima is a scandal. WHO has made public statements trivializing the emergency and ceding all of its responsibilities to the IAEA, citing the treaty of 1957. “What is WHO’s role in nuclear emergencies? Answer by WHO: “Within the United Nations system, the IAEA is the lead agency for coordination of international response to radiation events.” (World Health Organization, Japan Nuclear Concerns, FAQ, 14 March 2011, Geneva)
The IAEA – an organization whose Board of Governors is dominated by and comprised almost entirely of nuclear industry members, holds fast to its opinion that Fukushima should be assessed at Level 5 on the International Rating scale for significant events in nuclear facilities (INES).
The quantity of radioactive Iodine-131 released is a central indicator for the evaluation of nuclear accidents on the INES scale. The release of more than “a few 10 ^ 16 Bq of iodine 131” is classified as a level 7 catastrophic accident this (INES) scale.
Apparently, the IAEA, TEPCO and the Japanese government officials in charge have not clearly stated how much radioactive material has been released throughout the unfolding of the Fukushima disaster. According to estimates by the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO), comprised of 60 monitoring stations world-wide under the auspices of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, the first three days of the Fukushima accident alone released about 3.8 x 10 ^ 17 Bq of radioactive Iodine-131. That is about 100 times the official inventory. The Fukushima disaster has also released significant amounts of several other radionuclides which have not even been measured. Due to these figures, the Fukushima accident would have been legitimately classified as INES level 7 a long time ago. Greenpeace is now in the process of conducting its own analysis.
The behavior of WHO and the IAEA is therefore an unprecedented scandal. An inappropriately small evacuation zone is estimated to have resulted in the needless exposure of pregnant women, children, and other adults to excessive levels of radiation and radioactive contamination beyond 250mSv, the limit set for the recognition of work related cancer among Japanese nuclear power plant employees. Radiation biology assumes that if 10,000 people were exposed to a dose of 1 Sv, then 500 deaths are expected to occur as a result of their exposure (ICRP60) 500-1200 (BEIRV) 580-1740 (RERF), 2400 (Köhler). The ICRP – another profiteer of the atomic industry – made the recommendations for radiation protection standards, which were accepted by all countries and which were used o justify IAEA regulations. Interesting isn’t it?
The UN is divided into 7 organisations, of which two are of interest to us, the Economic and Social Council and the Security Council.The “Economic and Social Council” oversees ALL the United Nations agencies with the exception of the “IAEA”.
In fact, the IAEA is the only agency that reports directly to the “Security Council” which is made up of representatives of 15 countries, of which 5 are permanent members of the Council : the United States, the Untied Kingdom, the Russian Federation, China and France.
These 5 nations are all nuclear powers, both civil and military, and almost all are exporters of nuclear technology.
The 10 remaining members (or countries) have a mandate which lasts for 2 years.
The influence of these 5 permanent members of the Security Council on policy making within the IAEA is enormous and ongoing. With no counterbalancing power, it is almost impossible to claim that the IAEA has an objective view of the nuclear industry and the consequences of its use.
On 28th May 1959, the IAEA (not yet two years old !) and WHO signed an agreement referred to as “WHA 12-40” which, though it might, on paper, appear balanced and reciprocal, in practice, puts WHO in a subordinate position to the IAEA.
From this day on all information policy by the media, the ministeries, the universites and commissions is directly affected by that. We’ve seen it happening with Chernobyl and in Japan.
“Presently the international organizations (WHO, IAEA) recognize as the main cause of increase of thyroid cancer in liquidators and children population after the accident their irradiation with radioactive iodine, I-131. The rest of diseases, they suppose, are provoked by psycho-emotional reactions..” (!!!…RADIOPHOBIA…!!!) There is no linear dose effect correlation, but “The bimodal dependence of effects on dose was revealed for all studied parameters. Namely, effects increased at low doses, reached maximum (for low doses), then decreased (in some cases the effect sign reversed) and thereafter increased with the increase of dosage”: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Burlakova.pdf
From our 2011 visit at the U.N. in Geneva, Q & A with World Health Organisation:
This Fascist Anti Human Development is going on invisible. Like Radiation. Statistics individualize each case.
Here are examples:
The Tuskegee Timeline to study natural progression of untreated syphilis in black men who thought they were receiving free health care:http://www.cdc.gov/tuskegee/timeline.htm
Scientists from Harvard and MIT have distributed radioactively contaminated breakfast mentally handicapped at the school, from 1946 to 1956.
NASA and NRC experiments:
“The subject lay face down with his scrotum in a small plastic box filled with warm water to encourage the testes to descend. On either side of the box were a matched set of x-ray tubes. The alignment of the x-ray beams could be checked through a system of peepholes and mirrors.” http://www.hss.energy.gov/healthsafety/ohre/roadmap/achre/chap9_2.html
The same is done today, by nuclear programs, called ETHOS and CORE.
Dementia, Cancer, Autism, Demographic Chance, allergies, auto immue diseases, and so on. All kinds of syndroms and symptoms, going back to ONE SOURCE:
After the 2nd World War, United Nations were created. What they meant is “Global Dictatorship.” One army, one electronic currency, one energy source. Dependency on life prolonging drugs and energy for the masses. You can escape the second one by “Green” Energies, but not the fire they ignited in your DNA: Now the invisible atomic war is going on, after the Cold War. A Cellular Apocalypse. All major media and industries are involved, by active fire or ignoring. A nuclear reactor is a slow nuclear bomb, and the nuclear energy age is a slow atomic war. Meanwhile, soon to be World Police State – the United Nations, with it’s 100% pharma daughter W.H.O. Geneva and it’s nuclear assasins’ spokesman IAEA irradiate everything, also their own structure:
And ICRP? They said goodbye to humanity long ago: “The most important consideration is the generally accepted value judgment that early embryonic losses are of little personal or social concern.” Dr R. Mole, 1979, a member of ICRP – The international committee which makes the dose limits WORLDWIDE ignores LIFE. http://bjr.birjournals.org/content/52/614/89
IAEA once said “9,000 excess Chernobyl cancer deaths” – great work IPPNW / PSR you are now doing their work. Admitting something, denying anything: http://www.chernobylreport.org/?p=summary
10,000 deaths are “dangerous” but acceptable – to industry standards YEARLY / ANNUAL.
And IPPNW says these 10,000 Are ALL, for all coming years! There can ‘t be a more nuclear friendly statistic, than the one coming from IPPNW / PSR!
That is the reason why IAEA, ICRP, UNSCEAR and (welcome to the club) IPPNW / PSR quote it. This is even per year, so the publication is even more nuclear friendly:
Cancer deaths in the next generations – no one gives a damn. It seems IPPNW sucks in all activity and experts and dissolves more and more into semi anti nuclear organisation.
The Nuclear Industry installed FAKE pro human data collectors in irradiated areas:
French nuclear program ETHOS & CORE, and IAEA supported Fukushima Medical University are Data Colllectors.
According to my experience and independentWHO.org both instruments are used to collect all epidemiological data of irradiated people, of irradiated food, of irradiated soil and irradiated DNA, abortions, cancer, stillbirths, misscarriages, diseases, and so on. NOT to help, not to inform, not to evacuate people but to surpress the data and tell people to stay where they are, in irradiated areas. Source: http://independentwho.org/en/2014/02/05/chernobyl-model-fukushima/
Basically, each cell can respond to injury with four responses:
1) The damage is so severe that the cell dies.
2) The cell can repair the damage (in children mitosis accelerates damage before repair).
3) The cell loses its ability to produce certain substances, such as in the pancreas gland which can not produce insulin anymore (increase of diabetes in Belarus among children and adults) or other digestive juices during the growth, of the thyroid hormones.
4) The malignant cells degenerate and there is cancer.
Each point is ignored by the United Nations and National Bodies.
The main way in which the “radiation protection industry” has succeeded in hugely underrating the ill-health caused by nuclear power is by insisting on a group of extremely restrictive definitions as to what qualifies as a radiation-caused illness statistic. For example, under IAEA’s criteria:
> If a radiation-caused cancer is not fatal, it is not counted in the IAEA’s figures
> If a cancer is initiated by another carcenogen, but accelerated or promoted by exposure to radiation, it is not counted.
> If an auto-immune disease or any non-cancer is caused by radiation, it is not counted.
> Radiation-damaged embryos or foetuses which result in miscarriage or stillbirth do not count
> A congenitally blind, deaf or malformed child whose illnesses are are radiation-related are not included in the figures because this is not genetic damage, but rather is teratogenic, and will not be passed on later to the child’s offspring.
> Causing the genetic predisposition to breast cancer or heart disease does not count since it is not a “serious genetic disease” in the Mendelian sense.
> Even if radiation causes a fatal cancer or serious genetic disease in a live born infant, it is discounted if the estimated radiation dose is below 100 mSv [mSv= millisievert, a measurement of radiation exposure. One hundred millsievert is the equivalent in radiation of about 100 X-Rays].
> Even if radiation causes a lung cancer, it does not count if the person smokes — in fact whenever there is a possibility of another cause, radiation cannot be blamed.
> If all else fails, it is possible to claim that radiation below some designated dose does not cause cancer, and then average over the whole body the radiation dose which has actually been received by one part of the body or even organ, as for instance when radio-iodine concentrates in the thyroid. This arbitrary dilution of the dose will ensure that the 100 mSv cut-off point is nowhere near reached. It is a technique used to dismiss the sickness of Gulf War veterans who inhaled small particles of ceramic uranium which stayed in their lungs for more than two years, and in their bodies for more than eight years, irradiating and damaging cells in a particular part of the body.
a patient who survived cancer five years counts as cured: http://mondediplo.com/2008/04/14who quote ” ending studies after 10 years thereby excluding long term morbidity and mortality; qualifying five year survival as “cure”, only considering cancer”
IAEA and Fukushima Medical University get their money from the nuclear industrial military complex. IAEA gets annual 330 million EUROs.
Fukushima Hospital gets 330 additional beds, including a pediatric oncology… and hematology and gynacology. Source is Ian Thomas Ash’s new movie. http://ianthomasash.blogspot.de/
And now the industrial-medical connections:
from 14 Dec 2012:
“…the IAEA will endeavour to organize conferences, seminars and workshops, in cooperation with the University, with the aim of enhancing public awareness of radiological effects on human health and addressing the issue of “radiation fear” and post-traumatic stress disorders in the Fukushima population…” http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/energy/fukushima_2012/pdfs/fukushima_iaea_en_06.pdf
See how they officially blame psychological issues to be the problem, as they did with Chernobyl, a blackout on direct damage to health, instead all Unirted Nations orgs focus on social and economic consequences.
CORE, another such program was installed in Belarus for one purpose – to see how a chernobyl effect would look like in a western european country.
“French organisations, financed by rich European countries collected data on the levels of contamination in people, gave them lessons on how to avoid excessive contamination, but did not offer medical treatment to the contaminated children they observed . Even worse, they refused to distribute the natural pectin-based additive to these highly contaminated children” http://independentwho.org/en/2014/02/05/chernobyl-model-fukushima/
The already existing Chernobyl NGO’s do not play a role in the CORE program, beside themself participate on CORE – with their own (already short) budget – raised from international donations.
The CORE program was made public by the IBB (Link) in 2004, after developed behind secret doors. The IBB is a pseudo NGO with a big headquarter in Minsk, Belarus, where the KGB is a “daily guest”.
Who developed CORE / ETHOS and why is it the mayor international Chernobyl project today? Simple Answer: CEPN – “Centre d`etudes sur L’Evaluation de la Protection dans la domaine du Nucleaire” – a Study Center for radiation protection in the atomic sector, which should controll both research and science. CEPN already developed the failed ETHOS program and is also responsible for the today programs of CORE. View CEPN websiteHERE
But CEPN is not a NGO. CEPN was founded by the French Électricité de France (the mayor atomic power BIG player in the E.U.), French electricity association, and by CEA, the Comissariat for atomic power AREVA (former COGEMA). Not far away from IAEA. Remember the IAEA: They deny any links between radiation and illness excpet thyroid cancer.
The Budget of the CORE program: 5 Million EUROs. But there are also papers which show a Budget of 4 Million EUROs. The truth is: You need Billions of EUROs to “handle” Chernobyl: More than 2 Million people are still living in contaminated areas in Belarus. How to evacuate them? Build endless houses? Why such a small budget? If you would push more money into it you would admit that Chernobyl was what it was: A unpayable Catastrophe. And one 2nd thing: You would admit that atomic power is unpayable – none of the atomic reactors on this planet are assured. A big crash like the Chernobyl one would cause a damage of 2 – 5,000,000,000,000 EUROs in the U.S. or in the E.U.
And so, in May 2008, the belarusian Government struck off 1000 villages and communities from the list of contaminated areas.
Chernobyl program CORE has the aim to “end” Chernobyl. By helping people to die (not to live!) in irradiated areas. The only state supported program.
The 30th Chernobyl “became flesh anniversary” awaits.
Meanwhile many sites are dying, containing critical data (from U.N. webspace, from IPPNW servers, blogs and elsewhere, Fukushima Medical University) some are even deleted from the internet wayback machine. See some links I posted above. Try it with wayback.
The UN is divided into 7 organisations, of which two are of interest to us, the Economic and Social Council and the Security Council.The “Economic and Social Council” oversees ALL the United Nations agencies with the exception of the “IAEA”.
In fact, the IAEA is the only agency that reports directly to the “Security Council” which is made up of representatives of 15 countries, of which 5 are permanent members of the Council : the United States, the Untied Kingdom, the Russian Federation, China and France.
These 5 nations are all nuclear powers, both civil and military, and almost all are exporters of nuclear technology.
The 10 remaining members (or countries) have a mandate which lasts for 2 years.
The influence of these 5 permanent members of the Security Council on policy making within the IAEA is enormous and ongoing. With no counterbalancing power, it is almost impossible to claim that the IAEA has an objective view of the nuclear industry and the consequences of its use.
On 28th May 1959, the IAEA (not yet two years old !) and WHO signed an agreement referred to as “WHA 12-40” which, though it might, on paper, appear balanced and reciprocal, in practice, puts WHO in a subordinate position to the IAEA.
From this day on all information policy by the media, the ministeries, the universites and commissions is directly affected by that. We’ve seen it happening with Chernobyl and in Japan.
“…the IAEA will endeavour to organize conferences, seminars and workshops, in cooperation with the University, with the aim of enhancing public awareness of radiological effects on human health and addressing the issue of “radiation fear” and post-traumatic stress disorders in the Fukushima population…” http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/energy/fukushima_2012/pdfs/fukushima_iaea_en_06.pdf
“Presently the international organizations (WHO, IAEA) recognize as the main cause of increase of thyroid cancer in liquidators and children population after the accident their irradiation with radioactive iodine, I-131. The rest of diseases, they suppose, are provoked by psycho-emotional reactions..” (!!!…RADIOPHOBIA…!!!) There is no linear dose effect correlation, but “The bimodal dependence of effects on dose was revealed for all studied parameters. Namely, effects increased at low doses, reached maximum (for low doses), then decreased (in some cases the effect sign reversed) and thereafter increased with the increase of dosage”: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Burlakova.pdf
“it is recognized by the World Health Organization that the International Atomic Energy Agency has the primary responsibility for encouraging, assisting and coordinating research and development and practical application of atomic energy for peaceful uses throughout the world without prejudice to the right of the World Health Organization to concern itself with promoting, developing, assisting and coordinating international health work, including research, in all its aspects.” http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/Others/inf20.shtml#note_c
is a peaceful cesium 137 atom less lethal than a martial one?
Cesium 137 and Children Cardiac insufficiency in 18% of children with less than 5 becquerel per kg
65% in children with 11 to 26 becquerels per kg
87% in children with 74 becquerels per kg http://www.smw.ch/docs/pdf200x/2004/49/smw-10219.pdf
The UNSCEAR informs the UN General Assembly about the latest on policy and research of the IAEA. The members of the UNSCEAR serve the interests of their national governments, most of which have nuclear programs. These must be protected, not the victims of Chernobyl or Fukushima.
This small group of scientists have full control over politics, and on the recognition that research is paid off, which could perhaps be a threatto their results and decisions.
All submissions that are not consistent with the recommendations and the policy of the Board are stamped as ignorant, emotional, not scientific.
All international U.N. organisation will ignore the fate of the Fukushima children, as they did with the Chernobyl children
Pro Nuclear New York Times said 1996: “Chernobyl “compressed several thousand years of evolution into a decade” and “Inherited Damage Is Found In Chernobyl Area Children: changes in DNA in sperm and eggs. Such mutations are passed on from generation to generation.” SOURCE: http://www.nytimes.com/1996/05/07/science/chernobyl-s-voles-live-but-mutations-surge.html
AND, also from New York Times 1996: “Radiation at any level is a uniquely potent cause of chromosome mutations that can lead to so-called irregularly inherited disorders like heart disease, cancer, diabetes, multiple sclerosis, schizophrenia, asthma, rheumatoid arthritis, Alaheimer’s disease and many, many more.” http://www.nytimes.com/2000/06/25/nyregion/l-even-background-levels-of-radiation-are-harmful-922897.html
Kofi Annan, former United Nations Secretary General once said:
“not until 2016, at the earliest, will we know the full number of those likely to develop serious medical conditions.” former Secretary-General Kofi Annan http://www.un.org/ha/chernobyl/docs/sgsm7778.htm
As Kennedy said before:
“… there is no amount of radiation so small that it has no ill effects at all on anybody. There is actually no such thing as a minimum permissible dose. Perhaps we are talking about only a very small number of individual tragedies – the number of atomic age children with cancer, the new victims of leukemia, the damage to skin tissues here and reproductive systems there – perhaps these are too small to measure with statistics. But they nevertheless loom very large indeed in human and moral terms.
Radiation, in its simplest terms – figuratively, literally and chemically – is poison. Nuclear explosions in the atmosphere are slowly but progressively poisoning our air, our earth, our water and our food. And it falls, let us remember, on both sides of the Iron Curtain, on all peoples of all lands, regardless of their political ideology, their way of life, their religion or the color of their skin. Beneath this bombardment of radiation which man has created, all men are indeed equal.” http://www.jfklibrary.org/Research/Research-Aids/JFK-Speeches/Milwaukee-WI_19600402-Wisconsin-Assoc-of-Student-Councils.aspx
He practically was saying: “Stop the nuclear reactors”
He had the nerve to deescalate cuban missle crisis AND ended the above ground nuclear testing. Too much. They had to get rid of him. This (!) is a motive. And not a Conspiracy theory. It`s real.
Or Linus Pauling: He proved that by fallout of the atomic and h bomb tests of 195815.000 children with severe hereditary error came to the world in one year. 38,000 children were born dead. 90,000 were murdered inside of the mother.
Or “Mr. Eugenics” Herman Muller: “Accordingly, the great majority of mutations, certainly well over 99%, are harmful .”Herman J Mueller – father of modern genetics. Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1946
“We each carrya load of about four serious faults in our DNA. We are saved from fourfold incapacitation by covering most of these faults with a normal gene from our parents.” http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1716299/
Better medical care does not mean a bright future, the evolutions phases out each disturbance: “H.J. Muller estimated that thegenetic load accumulatedin 8 human generations (∼ 240 years) living under constantly improving medical services with zero mortality rate due to natural selective forces is equivalent to that acquired in a single exposure to 200roentgen (1,8 Sievert) of gamma radiation 2 kilometers from Ground Zero in Hiroshima.”
Or Mr. Lederberg: “Radiation exposure is an inevitable side-effect of our atomic energy programs, as well as of medical X-rays and of our natural environment. The Atomic Energy Commission (AEC = NRC) standards of permissible exposure (about 30 times larger than the level we experience now from atomic energy activities) would increase the natural rate of mutation about 10 percent. Over a period of generations the health costs of these additional mutations would be about $10 billion a year. This estimate and its probable uncertainty by a factor of 10 either way, needs to be factored into the economics of energy production and, more immediately, into the cost-effectiveness of the genetic research needed to plan on a basis of scientific certainty. Most of the atomic-energy related costs might even be canceled if we made sufficient efforts now to develop the countermeasures.” Government Is Most Dangerous of Genetic Engineers , Washington Post 1970 – by Joshua Lederberg – 1958 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. http://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/ps/access/BBABXZ.pdf
Bombs explode, planes crash. As evidence, there are only pictures of men (Belgium), often not even that. Or fragments of the plane (germanwings, MH17), or not even that (MH370). In the age of the symbol everything is possible. A meltdown that never happened (TEPCO – no photo). Even that the Design becomes the template for reality. Only the consequences are clear: a police state, with more safetys, and no more freedom.
And many “debt generations” paying with mutation loaded DNA and suffering.
Welcome to the age of symbol where a bomb is detonated. And all we get is a photo. Showing three men. That is all. Of course global press agencies have the “insight” story and “facts” shortly afte: http://edition.cnn.com/2016/03/22/europe/brussels-explosions/ (major media in hands of elite)
What a coincidence. What will we do? Shouting “More Safety”, “more Police”? Will the European Union become a Police State, where everyone can be put in jail any moment? Like in Britain, during the era of “Defence Regulation 18B”: http://www.jstor.org/stable/175278?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
The people caring for our safety by reducing freedom are currently planning new “terrorist” attacks against us. Will my comment become illegal then? Yes, it will. They are crying about the belgian nuclear reactors, not because there are miniature cracks and fissures in the architecture as we all know, no! Because they are afraid of terrorists. They plan to make these plants inaccesible to us, to the public as a whole. A harder law than the “Secret Defense” in France:http://www.sortirdunucleaire.org/Secret-defense-le-nouveau-scandale
And TEPCO? They still sell us the meltdown lie as reality, this time even without a photo, without any evidence. Nothing. They vented three reactors into our world, making the radioactivity of 3,000 Hiroshima bombs available to us. The age of the symbol. Creating a reality beyond imagination: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2015/03/19/thousands-of-tepco-nuclear-bombs-missing/
Right now, infront of me, 4 police officers are controlling people’s bags here at the border of Germany. 4 will become 40,000 and the border your home. And then your mind. As long as the smartphone does not become the brain micro ship. One wee ago I visited a home for disabled people in the Netherlands, where everything works with face tracking cameras, in each room. Soon, robots drive through and greet the people. They are being built in Belgium.
Other examples of desgined reality and war and reducing freedom by planned attacks and false evidences:
Epidemiology goes through a template before it comes to a conclusion. This template is called “individualization”. And so there is an ever lasting equal designed reality. With ever new syndromes. But the same old cause. Our geneticists, physicians and experts do not shout: “Are we mad? Shut all reactors down! They produce mutagenic substances!” – The news agencies get their commands – from industry, military and soon-to-be world dictatorship: The “Unted Nations” – all from the same sources. And the media then spread this unchanging echo. “Concern Could increase” instead of “more deaths, more damage” It is always only a “concern” a virtual term. An emotion. An emotion that can be overcome. And this “overcoming” is the illusion that is kept alive to support this mutagenic agenda, to sell the idea of cosmetics to us: The Decontamination. Each day another U.S. reactor “leaks”. Our Wakefulness expressed is branded as “scaremongering”. We are hypnotized and our thoughts are controlled while our DNA is changed with more and more damage. And not concern.
We should look at effects on animals, I think they don’t suffer from radiophobia as IAEA and WHO and ICRP and UNSCEAR claim:
It is the same in Germany, and other industrial countries, with nuclear reactors:
Total female mortality during pregnancy exceeds total male mortality. The unbiased sex ratio at conception, the increase in the sex ratio during the first trimester, and total mortality during pregnancy being greater for females are fundamental insights into early human development.”
“The most important consideration is the generally accepted value judgment that early embryonic losses are of little personal or social concern.” Dr R. Mole, 1979, a member of ICRP – The international committee which makes the dose limits WORLDWIDE ignores LIFE. http://bjr.birjournals.org/content/52/614/89
“The gender gap in 1987 – 2007 (Chernobyl gender gap) corresponds to approximately 440 000 theoretical missing female births when only the female sex was affected. If also male births were affected at a ratio of male: female = 3:10, is the gender gap by about 790 000 (180 000 +610 000) male + female births” PAGE 32 http://www.tschernobylkongress.de/…/ScherbVoigt…
In December 2011, 9 months after Fukushima, there is also a significant deficit in the number of live births in Japan. A similar decline in birth numbers was found in February 1987 in southern Bavaria, the German region most affected by Chernobyl fallout. In Japan as well as Bavaria, the effect is limited to a single month.” http://www.strahlentelex.de/Infant_mortality_in_Japan…
NY TIMES 1996: “Inherited Damage Is Found In Chernobyl Area Children: changes in DNA in sperm and eggs. Such mutations are passed on from generation to generation.” http://www.nytimes.com/…/inherited-damage-is-found-in…
Many people just have amputated their imagination power and reality is still greater than imagination – that scares them, so they prefer facts. And here our experts come. With their templates aka text books. Everything behaves to standards. No reason for fear.To lose fear and forgetting things is also a critical mass.
The genetic mutations are expressed at the advanced age of the individual. For us that was “aging” or “Being old”. Now there is in children: rheumatism, dementia, cancer. The previous generations had the chance of becoming old, but were already “affected”. We’re not getting older, but age faster. By genetic load. This is known to the ruling class since at least 60 years (two generations). But no geneticist loses a word about this expiration date of huge parts of the human race.
In the eyes of those in power, there can be nothing better than hatred, suspicion and false focus, among the to be dominated people. They become a simple controllable mass. They call for retaliation and military spending can rise.
“Diagnoses of cancers were identified from the Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry. A two-fold higher risk for leukaemia and brain tumours was seen among children exposed to dose rates of ≥200 nSv/h compared to those exposed to .” http://www.ispm.ch/index.php?id=377&no_cache=1&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=1585
Swiss Childhood Cancer Cancer and Nuclear Power Plants in Switzerland (as usual attacked by physicists BUT confirmed by physicians: the IPPNW – peace nobel prize 1985): http://www.canupis.ch/index.php?id=studydesign
The main way in which the “radiation protection industry” has succeeded in hugely underrating the ill-health caused by nuclear power is by insisting on a group of extremely restrictive definitions as to what qualifies as a radiation-caused illness statistic. For example, under IAEA’s criteria:
> If a radiation-caused cancer is not fatal, it is not counted in the IAEA’s figures
> If a cancer is initiated by another carcenogen, but accelerated or promoted by exposure to radiation, it is not counted.
> If an auto-immune disease or any non-cancer is caused by radiation, it is not counted.
> Radiation-damaged embryos or foetuses which result in miscarriage or stillbirth do not count
> A congenitally blind, deaf or malformed child whose illnesses are are radiation-related are not included in the figures because this is not genetic damage, but rather is teratogenic, and will not be passed on later to the child’s offspring.
> Causing the genetic predisposition to breast cancer or heart disease does not count since it is not a “serious genetic disease” in the Mendelian sense.
> Even if radiation causes a fatal cancer or serious genetic disease in a live born infant, it is discounted if the estimated radiation dose is below 100 mSv [mSv= millisievert, a measurement of radiation exposure. One hundred millsievert is the equivalent in radiation of about 100 X-Rays].
> Even if radiation causes a lung cancer, it does not count if the person smokes — in fact whenever there is a possibility of another cause, radiation cannot be blamed.
> If all else fails, it is possible to claim that radiation below some designated dose does not cause cancer, and then average over the whole body the radiation dose which has actually been received by one part of the body or even organ, as for instance when radio-iodine concentrates in the thyroid. This arbitrary dilution of the dose will ensure that the 100 mSv cut-off point is nowhere near reached. It is a technique used to dismiss the sickness of Gulf War veterans who inhaled small particles of ceramic uranium which stayed in their lungs for more than two years, and in their bodies for more than eight years, irradiating and damaging cells in a particular part of the body.
Worldwide more boys are born – impact on demographic change?
The Study:
“Total female mortality during pregnancy exceeds total male mortality. The unbiased sex ratio at conception, the increase in the sex ratio during the first trimester, and total mortality during pregnancy being greater for females are fundamental insights into early human development.”
“The most important consideration is the generally accepted value judgment that early embryonic losses are of little personal or social concern.” Dr R. Mole, 1979, a member of ICRP – The international committee which makes the dose limits WORLDWIDE ignores LIFE. http://bjr.birjournals.org/content/52/614/89
In December 2011, 9 months after Fukushima, there is also a significant deficit in the number of live births in Japan. A similar decline in birth numbers was found in February 1987 in southern Bavaria, the German region most affected by Chernobyl fallout. In Japan as well as Bavaria, the effect is limited to a single month.” http://www.strahlentelex.de/Infant_mortality_in_Japan_after_Fukushima.pdf
http://www.odwac.gov.on.ca/standards_review/tritium/Tritium_Radiation_Risks_Additional_Note_for_ODWAC_Fairlie.pdf – quote: “Background radiation is also the primary reason why women aged over ~40 are advised not to have children. This is because their stocks of ova have been exposed since birth to 40 or so years’ background radiation and have thereby been damaged to such an extent that an unacceptable proportion, when fertilised, results in congenital malformations, spontaneous abortions or stillbirths. Many scientists also consider that background radiation is the prime factor in the ageing process, and is ultimately the reason why we are not immortal.” PAGE 5
Juri Dubrova created children DNA fingerprints and compared their data with the DNA profile of British children who had lived on non irradiated region. The results of the study: the higher the soil contamination by cesium-137, the higher the mutation rate in a genomic fragment: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC378537/
Published in 1990 by Martin Gardner and Eve Roman, a study in which they examined the fathers of children with leukemia. They found: These fathers worked at Sellafield before “making” children and were exposed to radiation. The higher their dose was, the greater the risk was for their children to develop leukemia. Maximum: 5 mSv per year (Japan 20 mSv per year) repost: http://www.jstor.org/pss/29718787
Louise Parker in 1999 published a paper in which she examined primarily stillbirth in the “radiation workers” who work in a nuclear plant. She registered 9,208 births – among them were 130 stillbirths. The result of Parker’s study is appalling: When “producers” were irradiated 24 percent more stillbirths occured than of non-irradiated. (repost) http://www.lancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2899%2904138-0/abstract
Isn`t Immigration not a great method to mask the demographic change?
And isn`t demographic change not a great word to mask Infertility, impotence, abortions, miscarriages, stillbirths, syndromes?
And do these causes not have something to do, with the nuclear energy?
With the nuclear age?
Are the germ cells not among if not THE most sensitive cells?
Aren`t the fastest computers used for future probes?
A Modern crystal ball for the future fascism.
We are the actors. One act is one generation.
The Play is called Atomic Darwinism.
The model is evolution.
The nuclear Industry knows from ICRP 1966, publication 8, that the maximum death rate due to natural radiation is 100 deaths in 1,000,000 people. So, they use THIS RATIO as base for their term “SAFE”. Every radiation that kills 100 people in 1,000,000 is SAFE. This is the official allowed death rate. Tolerated by your officials, experts, health authorities, national nuclear bodies and politicians. This is the base for dose limits. This is why they compare man made radiation with natural radiation. As an excuse. FACT.
“… there is no amount of radiation so small that it has no ill effects at all on anybody. There is actually no such thing as a minimum permissible dose. Perhaps we are talking about only a very small number of individual tragedies – the number of atomic age children with cancer, the new victims of leukemia, the damage to skin tissues here and reproductive systems there – perhaps these are too small to measure with statistics. But they nevertheless loom very large indeed in human and moral terms.
Radiation, in its simplest terms – figuratively, literally and chemically – is poison. Nuclear explosions in the atmosphere are slowly but progressively poisoning our air, our earth, our water and our food. And it falls, let us remember, on both sides of the Iron Curtain, on all peoples of all lands, regardless of their political ideology, their way of life, their religion or the color of their skin. Beneath this bombardment of radiation which man has created, all men are indeed equal.”
~~~~~~~ John F. Kennedy (US President, Jan ’61 – Nov ’63) 1960
Source: Pro Nuclear ICRP International Commission on Radiation Protection – linked to IAEA and Industry. Founded 1928. One year after Nobel Prize Winner Muller proved the transmutation of the gene by radiation.
SCANS:
1927 Herman J Mueller discovered in 1927 (!) the following: ARTIFICIAL TRANSMUTATION OF THE GENE by radiation – he got the The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1946:
ICRP has confirmed in 1966 that natural radiation is harmful! ICRP Publication Number 8 from 1966 on page 60. in relation to the health damage caused by natural radiation for the bulk of the world’s population is a risk of sixth order (1 to 10 dead per million per rad / gray) in a few areas with high natural background radiation the risk fifth order. 10 to 100 dead per million and rad (gray). and in 1977 the ICRP publication number 26 said, that, in this sense, regional differences of the natural radiation are so regarded, that the corresponding differences include the damage. and in the ’80s the natural radiation was simply doubled. and in 2011 it became the twentyfold in japan: 20 mSv/a. Natural radiation is used as an excuse to increase artificial radiation with radionuclides from reactors.
“According to the ICRP in 1991, just 5 mSv to the testes could cause damage to offspring – yet this dose was permitted yearly to members of the public, and ten times more was permitted to nuclear workers, in all countries prior to 1990. It continues today to be permitted yearly for nuclear workers in most countries.” http://iicph.org/victims_of_the_nuclear_age
1971: the discoverer of plutonium and president of the USAECGlenn Theodore Seaborg resigns – at the same time the ICRPreduced the additional maximum dose near reactors for the public from 500 mrem/annual (5 mSv/a) to 5 mrem/annual (0,05 mSv/a).
the USAEC “protects” health and advertises nuclear industry at the same time, later renamed in AEC, then renamed in NRC.
And, in 1991, the ICRP lowered the standard from 5 mSv /a to 1 mSv/a: “For occupational exposure in planned exposure situations the Commission now recommends an equivalent dose limit for the lens of the eye of 20 mSv in a year, averaged over defined periods of 5 years, with no single year exceeding 50 mSv.” page 1: Source: http://www.icrp.org/docs/ICRP%20Statement%20on%20Tissue%20Reactions.pdf
And in 2011, the japanese government increased it for infants, students, mature, unborn, to: 20 mSv/a
20 mSv mean: below, but still high: 555,000 becquerel per m² contamination (from 1995 Belarus National Report):
17 milli Sievert per year mean: 16,000 – 32,000 additional cancer deaths AND 150,000 – 1,5 million deaths by genetic diseases:http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/PP/app1.html by John W. Gofman, Ph.D., M.D and Arthur R. Tamplin, Ph.D. quote “If we use the most optimistic Russell mouse genetic data, and even if we give full credit for slow delivery of radiation, we reach the conclusion that 100,000 extra genetic deaths per year would occur for the allowable average exposure of 170 millirads to the population. This can hardly be construed as an “optimistic” outlook, or a “safe” dose of radiation.”
“…To provide an adequate safety standard the dose limit of 1 mSv/y have to be reduced to 0.02 mSv/y or 20 µSv/y.”Page 9: http://www.staff.uni-marburg.de/~kunih/all-doc/stoakuni.pdf by Dr. Horst Kuni, Nuclear Medicine, University Professor.
Professor Yuri Bandazhevsky, a pathologist, Rector of the Medical Institute of Gomel, on the ingestion of radio caesium includes – he said: “Clinical checks on children between 1996 and 1999 show that at levels greater than 50Bq/kg there are pathological changes in vital organs and systems – cardiovascular, nervous, endocrine, immune, reproductive, digestive excretory and eyes. Caesium concentrations in the placenta reveal a relationship with nervous system defects in the foetus. The health condition of the population is a disaster but being a physician myself I cannot accept it as hopeless. With all my faith in God and life I appeal to anyone who can influence it: do your best to improve the situation. There is nothing more precious on this planet than life. And we should do everything possible to protect it.” http://www.spokesmanbooks.com/Spokesman/PDF/91Gifford.pdf
IAEA subsequently took its radiation protection recommendations directly from ICRP (rather than WHO), therefore persons from the Commission who also sit on UNSCEAR both make the rules and judge their adequacy: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/Chernobyl/CaUFtH.html
Clause 12 of the Executive conclusion of the Recommendation of the European Committee for radiation risks declares: “…Total maximal permitted dose from all human-caused sources should not exceed 0.1 mSv for population and 5 mSv for personnel”. This publication is declared by the European Committee for radiation risks as “regulating”. It is only common sense that we should follow the recommendations given in this publication by the scientists from Canada, Norway, Great Britain, Denmark, Switzerland, the USA, Ireland, Sweden, Germany, France, India, Belarus, Finland and Russia. page 16 http://independentwho.org/media/Documents_IW/Forum_Radioprotection_English_Abstracts_IW_2012.pdf
“European Parliament hears criticisms of radiation protection standards, but don’t publish findings” Brussels 1998: page 35 for example: Childhood leukemia caused by normal reactor operation: http://www.llrc.org/health/subtopic/stoaabstracts.pdf
