Posts Tagged ‘human’

Monkeys, Brains and TEPCO radiation:

“The effects associated with long-term low-dose radiation exposure on fetuses are among the many health concerns. Children born to atomic bomb survivors from Hiroshima and Nagasaki showed low birth weight, high rates of microcephaly, and reduced intelligence due to abnormal brain development. Experiments with pregnant mice or rats and radiation exposure had been reported to cause low birth weight, microcephaly or both. We identified one similar study on wild animals, which reported that the brains of birds captured in the vicinity of the Chernobyl NPP weighted lower compared to those of birds captured elsewhere.” https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-03866-8

quoted also on pro nuclear FORBES: https://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffmcmahon/2017/10/30/three-ways-radiation-has-changed-the-monkeys-of-fukushima-a-warning-for-humans/#7f0f60a465ea

Dr. Shin-ichi Hayama seems to refuse to link radiation and brain / head growth development. although it is known for decades, although at the same time he shows a connection. This is the typical scientific behavior. Calling their own studies myth.

Birds, Brains, and ROSATOM Chernobyl Radiation:

“Impaired brain development is linked to oxidative stress because of the high lipid content of brains. Large-brained individuals must be capable of continuously supplying the brain with high levels of oxygen for neuronal ion pumping, synthesis of neurotransmitters and protection from toxic compounds. This makes brain maintenance a highly oxidizing process that requires large amounts of antioxidants, in particular glutathione. Therefore, any environment with low antioxidant levels and/or high rates of use of antioxidants will provide a challenge to normal brain development.” http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0016862

Humans, Brains and US Reactors Radiation:

“mental retardation in children exposed to radiation during the fifth to 15th weeks of their mother’s pregnancy. Radiation kills brain cells, causing both an underdeveloped brain [microcephaly] and mental retardation” https://ratical.org/radiation/NAvictims.html

quoted also on semi pro nuclear NATURE: http://www.nature.com/articles/srep16594

No impact on Science

No impact on UN / WHO / IAEA / UNSCEAR / ICRP / Health Policy / Energy Policy

Genetic damage excluded
All health damage excluded
Environment damage excluded
Subsidies excluded




Read Full Post »


Original text by german government “Bundestag“: http://www.bundestag.de/presse/hib/2011_05/2011_198/01.html

The federal government should work towards the immediate cancellation of the contract between the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). In return, the role of WHO in the investigation health effects of disasters should be strengtened, The Greens called in application (17/5769). As the time window for a cancellation request: the General Assembly of the WHO of 16 to 24 May 2011 in Geneva.


The over “decades” secret agreement “of 1959 regulates that making studies of radiation effects made by WHO are only done in consultation with the IAEA.  Atomic Energy Authority Members therefore take decisive influence on the health assessment of nuclear disasters, without a mandate or have sufficient expertise and independence:

The main objectives of both organizations were in an “irreconcilable conflict”- here to promote the peaceful use of nuclear power, where the goal of “all nations and people to achieve the best possible health help. ”

IAEA-WHO 協定 (1959 年): http://www.crms-jpn.com/doc/IAEA-WHO1959.pdf

English /  Français:  indenpendentWHO.org

EDIT – more: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/05/27/margaret-chan-versus-world-health-organisation/

This contradiction reveals itself not least in the “untenable difference of the data on the number of deaths” in consequence of the Chernobyl nuclear disaster. Even with the disaster of Fukushima, the WHO currently has no dedicated team on site, could raise the radiation levels, regardless of nuclear power plant operator Tepco and the IAEA.
“Adequate provisioning and disaster management” but needed independent survey, evaluation and publication of such data, the Green Party wrote in their application

Source: http://bag-tschernobyl.net/informationen/stellungnahmen-und-dokumentationen/277-1-gruene-geheimvertrag-zwischen-iaeo-und-who-kuendigen.html

More backgroud information: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/05/12/w-h-o-secretary-general-chan-admits-for-the-first-time-in-52-years-radiation-is-always-dangerous/


BREAKING NEWS from May 21st 2011: U.N. launches study of Japan nuclear crisis



Read Full Post »



First of all:
Herman J Mueller discovered in 1927 (!) the following: ARTIFICIAL TRANSMUTATION OF THE GENE by radiation.

SOURCE: http://www.esp.org/foundations/genetics/classical/holdings/m/hjm-1927a.pdf he got the The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1946: – he got the The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1946:


The W.H.O. has a gag agreement with IAEA since 1959: http://mondediplo.com/2008/04/14who

Full article in german newsmag “TAZ”:


and: “Nuclear Threat Draws WHO and Civil Society Closer” http://www.independentwho.info/Presse_ecrite/11_05_05_IPS_EN.pdf and: http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/article1766914.ece?homepage=true and: http://www.independentwho.info/Presse_ecrite/11_04_27_IPS_EN.pdf in german: http://www.woz.ch/artikel/2011/nr15/international/20607.html 

and Info by the IPPNW (peace nobel price 1985): http://www.ippnw.de/commonFiles/pdfs/Atomenergie/who_letter_chan.pdf

IAEA-WHO 協定 (1959 年): http://www.crms-jpn.com/doc/IAEA-WHO1959.pdf

Русский / English / Deutsch / Castellano / Français:  http://www.independentwho.info

One of the most important News for the anti nuclear movement: http://independentwho.info/OMS-IW_2011-05-04_FR.php

Source WHO

I rushed the article through a google translator, sorry:

Radiation always dangerous

So far, the WHO took always the same heading as the IAEA: So-called internal radiation, “in the body is enriched, not dangerous. This is now over.

“There is no safe low levels of radiation, ” said WHO Director General Margaret Chan on Wednesday during a short meeting scheduled with members of the critical “initiative for an independent WHO “. By the former Ukrainian, Russian and Western European doctors and radiation biologists, and WHO staff based initiative has been demonstrating daily about four years before the WHO Office for cancellation of the agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

So far, the WHO had always taken the position specified by the IAEA, radioactive radiation below certain limits is NOT dangerous. Chan was referring in her testimony to the internal radiation from radioactive particles – such as Iodine 131, Cesium 137, Strontium 90, plutonium – they are being absorbed through food, water or air into the body and are deposited in the thyroid, bones or internal organs and continue radiation.

These particles are, after numerous studies by independent scientists who carried out since the nuclear disaster at Chernobyl in April 1986, responsible for up to 95 percent of all cancers caused by radiation and genetic changes. The WHO has denied the internal radiation up to today, and in all statements regarding potential health risks only to external radiation – based and related measurements with the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 – for example by a passing by radioactive cloud.

Chan distanced himself from Chernobyl sayings of the WHO

Chan distanced itself from the recent statements made by the WHO on the consequences of Chernobyl. “I personally do not believe that the nuclear accident in Chernobyl has claimed only 50 lives,” WHO Director-General said, according to transcripts of the interview with the critic initiative. In accordance with the IAEA, the WHO official said today, as a result of the Chernobyl disaster were only 52 people died and irradiated up to 6,000 more infected with thyroid cancer. These figures also took over the UN Commission of Atomic Scientists, and finally published in February this year.

Notwithstanding the correction of previous positions Chan insisted on and got to look at the current nuclear disaster in Fukushima “fully recognized its responsibility,” the WHO. And this “without restriction by the bilateral agreements with the IAEA in 1959.” Chan defended against the critics, too, that the WHO has to date the results of measurement to Fukushima under wraps, she and the IAEA regularly receives from the international authority to monitor agreements on nuclear weapons test ban (CTBTO). The world’s 80 monitoring stations of the CTBTO to register around the clock, the radioactivity in the atmosphere.

WHO has, however, Fukushima-measurement results under wraps

The “Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics (ZAMG) in Vienna, which also has access to the measurement results of the CTBT0, presented at the end of fixed March with a significantly higher leakage of radioactivity from Fukushima, when the Japanese authorities – based on their data, the WHO and the IAEA – publicly announced. Chan said the WHO would be the CTBTO measurement data “publish only if it’s dangerous values.” If that was the case, they decide “alone”.

At the same time admitted the Director-General, that “no expert on radiation,” and that the WHO “on this issue today almost at all has not within the jurisdiction more.” The Department of Radiobiology at the Geneva WHO headquarters was closed two years ago under pressure from private and public donors. Earlier, the deputy head of the department with the attempt to impose lower limits for WHO Iodine intake failed on objections by the IAEA and France: http://www.chernobylcongress.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/Baverstock_How_the_UN_works.pdf

WHO hushed Chernobyl Conference documents

Today in the WHO Geneva headquarters, only a single radiation biologist. Chan said the “Initiative for an independent WHO” to “investigate what happened to the documents of 2001, organized jointly with the IAEA Chernobyl conference in Kiev,” she wanted. So far, the WHO claims falsely that the documents had been published in full.

In fact, only a brief summary was published. Of the more than 700 documents of the first Chernobyl conference, conducted in 1995 jointly by WHO and IAEA in Geneva, have been published to date, only twelve. The IAEA had prevailed, citing the agreement with the WHO, the then WHO Director-General Nakashima been confirmed in a television interview.

Sixty-fourth World Health Assembly being held from May 16th till 24th 2011: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/events/2011/wha64/en/index.html

Press Article of the Federal Working Agency “For the Children of Chernobyl” Germany / Belarus: http://life-upgrade.com/Genf-Minsk-2011.pdf

INTERNAL Radiation exposure to plant workers in Fukushima:

FOX NEWS and PSR say also NO SAFE RADIATION LIMITS: http://www.foxnews.com/health/2011/06/29/radiation-in-our-food/

The National Academies of Science says All Levels of Radiation Confirmed to Cause Cancer: http://www.nirs.org/press/06-30-2005/1


How nuclear apologists mislead the world over radiation, by Dr. Helen Caldicott: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/apr/11/nuclear-apologists-radiation

Keith Baverstock, PhD, a graduate of London University, led the Radiation Protection Programme at the World Health Organisation’s Regional Office for Europe from 1991 to 2003. His critical views of the management and conduct of the Committee, particularly in its failure to make proper use of science and its lack of adherence to the Code of Conduct in Public Life, resulted in his dismissal – more information: http://www.chernobylcongress.org/speakers/artikel/2cc0de2cee21dc8506748b53a7d…

His presentation: How the UN / WHO / IAEA work: “How the UN works: “know thine enemy” or at least who it is.” http://www.chernobylcongress.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/Baverstock_How_the_UN_works.pdf

Mainichi newspaper has become the first newsaper in Japan which has reported about the IAEA-WHO gag order and that the WHO abolished the department of radiation health specialist. It mentioned the NGO “for the independence of WHO”: http://mainichi.jp/select/today/news/20110918k0000m030124000c.html?inb=tw info by Izumi Toshiosdóttir

WHO: abolish the department of radiation health specialist

September 18, 2011

World Health Organization United Nations specialized agencies (WHO), and abolished the department of radiation health specialist for two years ago, found that there are no plans to revive in the future due to financial difficulties. May, the WHO Director General Margaret Chan, the top sought after and investigating health hazards due to nuclear accident TEPCO Fukushima 1 WHO, European non-governmental organization (NGO) organization of 40 organizations contacted about “independence of the WHO For “approved by meeting with representatives.
Concurrently promoting the primary criticism of the leadership ◇ IAEA

Leadership of the investigation, such as health damage caused by nuclear Since 1959, International Atomic Energy Agency WHO (IAEA) has been been moved to the IAEA in the agreement entered into with, the NGO is “IAEA (after the accident, Fukushima) country While seeking to isolate and monitor promotion of nuclear power, which also serve both their own, there is a conflict, “such as criticism, have pointed out the limitations of the current international nuclear monitoring system.

According to WHO, were abolished, the Health Department’s headquarters was in charge of radiation and nuclear effects on the human body. In 2009, after the resignation of the director was suspected of collusion with industry, the organization itself has been dismantled. The current staff expertise in radiation damage is not only one, department from budget cuts planned resurrection, he said.

WHO is in agreement with the IAEA was established in 1959 to promote the peaceful use of nuclear energy. Without the consent of the IAEA is constrained such that their own work-related issues of primary health. Soviet nuclear accident in Chernobyl 88 years old after 1986, when a nuclear accident and the IAEA concluded that two new treaties, such as a state that corresponds to head the IAEA. Also in 2005, has led the IAEA additional issue of food imports and exports of radioactive material contaminated with the chemical.

The NGO is, has been criticized reason not been able global discovery is still health of the Chernobyl accident is weak authority survey of WHO, in the study health in Japan, the active involvement of UN agencies are expected to It is not reality.

In contrast, the WHO spokesman for the agreement with the IAEA “as well as WHO, UN specialized agencies are all similar as far as the nuclear relationship,” while indicating the recognition of de facto subordination in the “There is more radiation research group creating a healthy environment in the sector,” he said. “International Agency for Research on Cancer of the Chernobyl accident for subordinate agency (IARC, Lyon, France headquarters) are continuing to research and six regional offices,” said survey system was being maintained.

WHO in 2005 for the victims of Chernobyl 20 years after the accident investigation as a result “56 people dead and about 4,000 cancer deaths estimated in the future,” said. In contrast, such NGO is “too low compared to reality,” and criticized. The WHO has also admitted that plans for the re-survey of global discovery so far has not. This is the NGO “forced attention to the IAEA because of promoting nuclear power” has been pointed out.

<Whotoiaea>, WHO cooperation agreements with the United Nations’ specialized agency, “one. The IAEA 結Bazu a partnership agreement with the United Nations, the organization has independently and report to the General Assembly and Security Council “relevant agencies”. Hierarchical relationship of the two organizations have no authority in the organization.

◇ WHO and IAEA conventions list

<1959 agreement>

Article 1 Section 2 · “WHO, for use in research and development for peaceful use of nuclear energy around the world acknowledge that you do basically the IAEA”

Article 7 · “WHO and the IAEA, to avoid unnecessary duplication of their activities”

Article 12 Section 1 – “The two institutions could raise their agreement to fix”

<1986 “Convention on Early Notification Assistance nuclear accident 2” (WHO was ratified in 1988)>

• The nuclear accident occurred when, standing at the top of the international response IAEA, other international organizations, to support this assertion only when there is demand and acceptance of relevant government

<2005 “International Health Regulations,” revised>

• The crisis management rules originally intended for infectious disease control. Apply to issues such as import and export of products contaminated with chemical substances such as radioactive

Article 6 – “When was the problem areas related to the IAEA report had not, immediately report to the IAEA”

This is a result of our peace tour, which also took place with Chernobyl childern in Geneva, at the United Nations Office, with members of the W.H.O. (Dr. Neira), on April 26th 2011:

 Chernobyl Peace tour through Europe April 2011

More background:

Website Independent WHO

BREAKING NEWS from May 21st 2011: U.N. launches study of Japan nuclear crisis


New problems in Japan:

More radioactive water leaks into sea near stricken plant: http://www.asahi.com/english/TKY201105120188.html

Masks, sleeves in at Fukushima schools as radiation looms: http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20110512n1.html


Read Full Post »