Posts Tagged ‘Embryo’


His article: http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2012/12/16/news/who-downplayed-health-effects-of-nuclear-crisis-on-fukushima-residents-german-physician/#.UeaVXZyK07o

VIDEOS – part 1

part 2

Bandazhevsky recently was in Japan, his articles:


The Overview of independent nuclear science:
http://www.acsir.org/info.php?28 EN / JAP


Read Full Post »


Dr. Ernest J. Sternglass (born 1923, Berlin) is an emeritus professor at the University of Pittsburgh and Director of the Radiation and Public Health Project. He is an American physicist and author, best known for his controversial research on the health risks of low-level radiation from atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons and from nuclear power plants. This is  his study “Infant Mortality Changes Following the Three Mile Island Accident,” from 1980: http://atomichistory.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/sternglass_infantmortalitytmi.pdf

Go on the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention http://wonder.cdc.gov/cmf-icd9.html click on: I Agree, do a search, 1979, 1980, PA / Pennsylvania…

11/92 interview with Dr. Ernest J. Sternglass, author of Secret Fallout: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/inetSeries/ejs1192.html

TO THREE-MILE ISLAND as a full PDF FILE: http://www.nucleardemolition.com/SF.pdf

and: sternglass fallout and sat scores evidence for cognitive damage during early infancy phi delta kappa april 1983 http://www.jstor.org/pss/20386800

No wonder the NRC staff did not want to let the public know that they knew exactly in which direction the most radioactive clouds had moved, since this information could then be used to tie any later localized rises in fetal deaths, infant mortality, and cancer to the radioactive gas clouds from Three Mile Island. SOURCE: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/SecretFallout/SFchp18.html

media bought by atomic industry: http://www.nytimes.com/1995/08/02/business/cbs-accepts-bid-by-westinghouse-5.4-billion-deal.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm

More insight:

quotes by: http://ratical.org/radiation/KillingOurOwn/KOO14.html

quote: “But the firing of Gordon MacLeod hardly ended the controversy over the health impact of the accident and how it had been handled. In November, Ernest Sternglass charged that figures from the nearby Harrisburg and Holy Spirit hospitals indicated that infant deaths there had doubled from six during February through April of 1979 to twelve in May through July. Only one infant had died at the Harrisburg Hospital in May through July of 1978; seven had died there in those same three months following the accident. The statistics seemed tragically reminiscent of the era of nuclear bomb testing. The NRC, the state, and the utility had all claimed–as had the AEC after so many atomic explosions–that radiation releases had been too small to have more than a very marginal health impact, if any at all. Sternglass asserted the authorities had failed to account for the extreme sensitivities of fetuses in utero in claiming a very marginal health impact from the accident’s releases…” Ernest Sternglass, “Infant Mortality Changes Following the Three Mile Island Accident,” presented at the 5th World Congress of Engineers and Architects, Tel Aviv, Israel, 1980

quote: “The charge that TMI had actually killed area infants provoked a storm of outrage from the government of Pennsylvania. The state responded–as it had at Shippingport six years earlier–that the official statistics Ernest Sternglass had used were, after all, inaccurate. Dr. George Tokuhata, director of the state’s Department of Epidemiological Research, said a “printing error” on the part of the U.S. Bureau of Vital Statistics had skewed the state’s infant-mortality figures. There were thus eighty-eight fewer infant deaths in Pennsylvania in the summer of 1979 than originally recorded.Sternglass, however, held his ground. Discrepancies between state and federal data are not uncommon. But this particular case seemed “suspicious.” The discrepancy in infant deaths between the two sources for the period of April 1 through June 30, 1979, had been two; from October 1 through December 31 it had also been two. For eighty-eight to surface between July 1 and September 30, precisely in the controversial summer months after the TMI accident, seemed unlikely.”
More about NRC: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/07/15/us-n-r-c-says-tritium-is-normal-reason-for-children-leukemia/

More about WHO / IAEA: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/07/19/how-the-iaea-actively-endangers-the-health-of-children/

Why low radiation (PETKAU EFFECT) is dangerous & how it works: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/03/14/low-radiation-the-petkau-effect/


Read Full Post »


Belarus is not the last dictatorship in Europe.

It’s the first after Chernobyl.*

*quote: 2009, by Burkhard Homeyer, pastor & chairman “Fund for the Children of Chernobyl”, Germany, Belarus (http://www.bag-tschernobyl.net/wer-wir-sind.html)

Evacuation-Ready Zone to Be Abolished on September 30: http://ex-skf.blogspot.com/2011/09/radiation-in-japan-evacuation-ready.html

Lukashenka wants to repopulate Chernobyl Chernobyl’s Zone “quickly” http://charter97.org/en/news/2009/4/26/17680/

The secret Agenda of Japan & IAEA is in full effect. Like in Belarus, where 72% of the Chernobyl fallout went down.

Principal Sawai of Yumoto Daini Middle School, Iwaki City, Fukushima: “The radiation problem is already finished,” he told the children and their parents. “You can go to school and go outside without any problem. You should not fear malicious gossip.” SOURCE: http://japanfocus.org/-Makiko-Segawa/3516

1996 said the belarusian president Lukashenko during a meeting of the IAEA: “We encourage people to come back. We will open the shops again and enable the people to return to their evacuated towns and villages.”

National statements were made by the President of Belarus, Mr. A. Lukashenko:



quote: “Lukashenko, as far as I understand, is doing it somewhat surreptitiously. It is not an open process. There are reports, for instance, of encouraging agriculture, redeveloping dairying and forestry operations, and encouraging people either to resettle or to move into contaminated areas.” – from (page 51): http://www.wilsoncenter.org/topics/pubs/OP295.pdf

BELARUS adopted a new program, that killed financial support for irradiated areas:

March 20, 1997:

President Lukashenko has ordered university graduates to teach in areas affected with high levels of radiation from Chernobyl: http://www.russianmeetingplace.com/forums/russia-ukraine-belarus-travel-news/topic.php/312-1.html

Lukashenko sends grads to contaminated areas: http://www.lindsayfincher.com/lukashenko-sends-grads-to-contaminated-areas.html

His statements of “overcoming Chernobyl” can be found from page 47 on, http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub1001_web.pdf ONE DECADE AFTER
CHERNOBYL Summing up the Consequences of the Accident Proceedings of an International Conference Vienna, 8-12 April 1996

Angela Merkel IGNORES all data and Chernobyl studies, showing an increase in diseases, mutation, disbility, mortality and morbidity and so on. EVIDENCE: http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/Pub1001_web.pdf ANGELA MERKEL said in 1996 at the IAEA meeting: page 51: “This week’s conference is an attempt to formulate a synthesis from the results of the meetings of the WHO in Geneva, the European Commission in Minsk and the International Forum on Nuclear Safety Aspects here in Vienna.(…) We must assess the epidemiological findings for other types of cancer, in particular with regard to leukaemia, which has always been thought to be the most sensitive indicator for exposure to radiation. There have not yet been any cases of leukaemia attributable to the disaster. What does this mean for the future? In this connection we will have to examine what this means for the development of other tumours or other health effects as the results of exposure to radiation.We think that we know that these effects on health are psychological consequences of the accident, the general uncertainty about the actual situation, as well as other stress factors, e.g. resettlement. This was associated with a disruption of social networks. Several hundred thousand people were evacuated or resettled, with enormous social implications. At the same time we can see an increase in the accumulation of specific diseases — not yet regarded as radiation induced — particularly among children.” SHE IGNORES 1000,000 ill Chernobyl children. (pure PR, with a foto of her in 1996 at the IAEA together, where also president Lukashenko of Belarus was and demanded Come back to irradiated areas, people!: http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Magazines/Bulletin/Bull383/38304781423.pdf)

The 1996 IAEA Conference has a successor: The 2011 Fukushima Symposium: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/09/10/this-years-911-will-be-japans-2nd-fukushima-warning/

PART 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRl7t_yhZhM PART 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xL3MiDEtrA At Minute 11:21: The Government wants the people to return to Fukushima!

Japan Forced School Children To Clean Radioactive Dirt From Swimming Pools: http://www.examiner.com/civil-rights-in-jersey-city/japan-forced-school-children-to-clean-radioactive-dirt-from-swimming-pools

CENSORSHIP is the only HELP radiation vicitims get.

Riot policemen against participants of “Chernobyl Way” in Minsk (Photo, video) http://charter97.org/en/news/2009/4/26/17678/

Livestream from Tokyo anti nuclear demonstrations and crackdown by Riot Police: http://www.ustream.tv/channel/kamatayusuke#utm_campaign=t.co&utm_source=7970606&utm_medium=social


Chernobyl’s Hostages: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/en/Novosti.html#Yr9904 – quote “What could they do in that situation? They made the most simplest decision – to return to the contaminated zones. Why? Because it is at least a week guarantee that they will have Chernobyl’s compensations for those remaining. For example, people living in zones of eviction have the right to receive 50 rubles per month (today it is about 2 USD). People working in that zones have rights to receive 300 rubles per month (it is about 12 USD). Taking into account that the average salary in Novozubkovo is 290 rubles per month, it is not difficult to imagine how such little money is important for the people.” More: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/en/Novosti.html

This is an example from Japan: http://fukushima-diary.com/2011/08/column-what-is-the-purpose-of-people-to-call-us-paranoid/

Japan could use the The daiyo kangoku justice system (http://www.amnesty.org/en/region/japan/report-2011) against whistleblowers and civil society. And Saiban-in (Lay Judge) System http://www.amnestyusa.org/research/reports/annual-report-japan-2011?page=2

Japanese government killing its own people in Fukushima – Offficals running away during public hearing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVuGwc9dlhQ

Anger in Japan Over Withheld Radiation Forecasts http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/09/world/asia/09japan.html?_r=2&pagewanted=all%3Fsrc%3Dtp

Japan’s throwaway workers: http://mg.co.za/article/2011-06-27-japans-throwaway-nuclear-workers/

This company http://www.adk.jp/ made a contract with Resources and Energy Agency for 70,000,000JPY to monitor internet.
Welcome to the battle field. (thanks to Sakurako for this information): This is how REAL (government made) radiation protection looks like: CENSORSHIP. This is all they do.

Japanese civil society: http://www.asahi.com/english/TKY201107270451.html

The only anti nuc government bureaucrat, Mr Koga (thanks Mochizuki Cheshire Iori) : https://twitter.com/#!/hasegawa24

Quote by Mariko Ichikawa, head of a consumer group from July 23rd 2011:

Experts say there is no effect on health if you eat a small amount of meat with the current [low] level of contamination. It may be necessary to check all meat cows in Fukushima Prefecture, but is it necessary for the government to use a large amount of taxpayers’ money to buy the [contaminated] meat and burn it? We need more discussion”


“I want everyone to remember the BSE crisis in the US, when people trusted the domestic beef. ”

Original japanese Source: http://mainichi.jp/select/opinion/closeup/news/20110723ddm003040079000c.html

Translation: http://ex-skf.blogspot.com/2011/07/japanese-consumer-advocates-scold.html

We do not need more discussion. We need to understand, that radionuclides in food cause no immediate dangers, because of the latency of Cesium 137 and Strontium 90, for example.

BSE is not subtantial equivalent to radiation. One is radiation of radionuclides with a halflife (30 years, but 300 years biological) the other is a Brain disease epidemic (BSE).

The statement of Mariko Ichikawa is criminal.

Here is a cry for survival from Fukushima with english subtitles: http://www.universalsubtitles.org/ja/videos/o9gtNtWoaqpZ/

Need more background? Listen to one of the leading atomic scientsts on earth: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/07/18/scientist-chris-busby-in-japan-reports/



One Japanese Citizen’s View of Fukushima Anarch: http://akiomatsumura.com/2011/07/one-japanese-citizens-view-of-fukushima-anarchy.html

DIARY of a Fukushima liquidator: http://yfrog.com/user/Happy20790/profile

Over 2,600 Meat Cows Suspected of Being Fed with Radioactive Rice Hay:

Original japanese Source: http://www.tokyo-np.co.jp/s/article/2011072301000673.html

Translation: http://ex-skf.blogspot.com/2011/07/over-2600-meat-cows-suspected-of-being.html

High Level of Plutonium rumored to have been detected in rice paddies 50 km from Fukushima I:


Radioactive iodine found in breast milk of Japanese mothers:


Report from Japan: http://www.dianuke.org/mochizuki-ioris-report-from-japan-4/

Japan: Science VS Politicians: http://ex-skf.blogspot.com/2011/07/part-2-professor-tatsuhiko-kodama-of.html

Cesium 137 in Japan’s food chain:


Herbs? Clay? Cure? That’s un ethic money making by esoteric people and business men.

Here is an article of the belarusian independent newspaper “Luninetz Progulka” – one of only 15 remaining independent in whole Belarus! This article speaks about the reduction of financial suppoert for irradiated areas and “ending Chernobyl” – it was a official decision by the government!

This is me and the deputy editor, in June 2011:

Read this: Since 2006, non-state Newspaper Inform-progulka Is prohibited for Sale at Newspaper Kiosk

Source: http://spring96.org/en/news/15916

quote “The almost absence of an independent press in Belarus leads to two central problems for the democratic opposition: on one hand their publicity and effectiveness is low and on the other hand, the state press is aggressively used as a propaganda tool against the independent press – and not just since the events following the presidential election.”: http://www.lphr.org/en/news/news-details/article/printmedien-in-belarus/

Will happen with newspapers in Japan also.

Japan officials are going to call radiation measurements illegal and that they are disturbing the industry. Health plays no role. They are adapting the IAEA ideology of Radiophobia: The fear of radiation is worse than the radiation. Civil Society with it’s Fukushima NGOs will become a threat to the poitical level and hunted down like in Belarus.

Dear Japan. Welcome to the Atomic State. A modern dictatorship. Where the Victims become the Offenders.

The health standard in Japan: 100 Millisieverts is o.k.

Original Japanese Source: http://www.asahi.com/special/10005/TKY201107210634.html

Translation: http://ex-skf.blogspot.com/2011/07/radiation-in-japan-100-millisieverts-in.html

Japan launches PR drive for nuclear power: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/japan/8600981/Japan-launches-PR-drive-for-nuclear-power.html

over 1300 cattle suspected of radiation contamination shipped: http://www.japantoday.com/category/national/view/over-1300-cattle-suspected-of-radiation-contamination-shipped

Even 250 Millisievert are o.k.

Please be aware, that 100 mSv represent an equivalent of 200 mammograms!

Japan increased the dose limit for children by 2000 percent: Which is now 20 mSv / per year -> 50 mammograms for every child PER YEAR.

If they increase the dose limit, there will be nothing left to censor!

The devil is relying on the bible. By the way death penalty is in Japan as in Belarus.

Soon, Japan will struck of irradiated areas from the radiation map, just like Belarus did: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2008/05/14/government-1000-villages-struck-off-from-being-contaminated/

THIS WILL HAPPEN IN JAPAN: Stopping compensation and support for irradiated areas:

PAGE 62: http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/NesterenkoChernobyl-Belarus.pdf

And it will lead to: criminal humanitarian programs: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/03/18/core-a-chernobyl-aid-program-that-kills/

“If we continue to treat them like victims, they feel like victims,” quote by Zoya I. Trafimchik, coordinator of the CORE programme

The costs of the atomic accident, tsnuami and earthquake are invaluable, because the full impact on human health is yet to come:


quote: “In about 4 years we’re going to see the same with japanese children.

Quiet Death.

The then children are already suffering much earlier – often with fatal consequences.

The cesium is present in the inheritance cells.

Precarious, is that the cesium implants in the ovaries and the eggs of women. Because renew their loans, they are damaged for life.

Although renewed in sperm, they also give more information to the injury during fertilization. Either, it can no longer be fathered children, or they get through father and mother misinformation in the future. The result you can not even imagine.

The authorities in Japan had long ago have put women and children in the south of the country. Why they did not is, in my view, totally incomprehensible. There will be massive leukemia. This cesium cloud is a disaster for the Japanese, and from all other radionuclides, we know nothing.

The body can not distinguish between Calcium and Strontium. If it is taken in through the food chain. It is built into the bones and teeth, shines there and hits the bone marrow, where sit the blood-forming organs: The stem cells that give rise to the red and white blood cells and platelets.

These cells are damaged by Strontium, and indeed a lifetime, because the strontium remains where it is: irradiating with short and beta radiation.”

Costs make pressure. Pressure destroys the democracy. No country in the world can pay for an atomic accident. Not a single reactor is assured, it’s simpy too expensive:


Human Health costs and nuclear energy:


Killing our own:

The Disaster of America’s Experience
with Atomic Radiation
Harvey Wasserman & Norman Solomon

the complete 1982 book: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/KillingOurOwn/

Belarus is transforming into a 2nd generation of some kind of Atomic State (Before: Chernobyl, Now: Reactor). Which means everyone who speaks against atomic power is an enemy of the state. New developments are under way: Belarusian officials detain over 450 after rally: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5ht93_cpV6vNi4Z5PsSGCiTOtxLGQ?docId=e6806b5fd8b240bbae405d2bfd098e74&index=0

More photos: http://toxaby.livejournal.com/514571.html?view=11193611

After leaving Areva, SIEMENS (web) cooperates with ROSATOM (web) – the russian concern, which started building the first Belarusian atomic reactor. Belarus is the most Chernobyl affected country in the world. Still more than 2 million people are living in contaminated areas there.

This is how the situation is Belarus is RIGHT NOW:


I wrote on March 15th 2011: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/03/15/fukushima-the-iaea-strategy/

The IAEA wants the people make believe, that the main effect of the atomic catastrophe is psychological. This is made in these steps:

– Make the people believe, that because of background radiation every additional radiation is natural, normal, not bad (known as the principle of “substantial equivalence”)

– Tell the people, that Fukushima is not as bad as Chernobyl, and, Chernobyl was a small accident (50 deaths acc. to WHO, 125,000 deaths acc. to Ukrainian health minisry 1993).

– Make the people believe, that any other statement is panic and unobjective (The IAEA uses the word “Radiophobia” for Chernobyl)

– The IAEA recognizes the disease in highly contaminated areas as not in connection with the contamination.

– Make sure that there are no independent measurements, only measurements by the atomic power plant operator, it is also important NOT to show radiation measurements during the TV weather forecasts.

– Make sure that there are no organized measurements at all, for each region, each plant, each city – especially not in the media. Or do reconstrucion on the basis of official data, which are often too low.

Advise the officals with authentic language

Advise the government to install a 30 km No Enter Zone – invented and used during the atomic weapon test in the U.S. – but 30 km is not enough for an atomic reactor accident.

Refuse cancer studies like the german KiKK study as unscientific

Raise radiation limits for different groups of people, so that different values can be measured but each is normal, and below the limt

Prof. Hiroaki Koide concludes that if Tokyo has been contaminated this much, then ‘areas within Fukushima prefecture must be seriously contaminated’.


Japanese government wants to reduce evacuation zone:

Prime minister Kan traveled to Fukushima on Saturday July 16th to talk with local officials.

Minami Soma city is asking all the evacuees to come back to their land:

Russian activist released from Belarusian jail after protesting against the new belarusian reactor: http://www.anti-atom.ru/en/node/1301

When the kiss of the mother is deadly for the child:

The ICRP says  “The cancer risk goes up by 0.5% with 100 millisieverts exposure.”

Well, that’s the ICRP: A direct servant of the atomic industry itsel. I qoute myself again: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/03/22/iaea-uncesco-icrp-playing-down-radiation-in-fukushima-and-chernobyl-is-scientifically-valid/

The following is from Dr. Katsumi Furitsu (her speech on youtube) (this is a report about Fukushima, by her), Research Committee of the atomic bomb victims at Hannan Chuo Hospital, Osaka, Japan:

Report of the International Komietees the IAEA in 1991: The international Chernobyl project, assess the effects on health and the environment and evaluation of radiation protection measures. Presentation 1991, in Vienna. Chairman of the Committee, Dr Itsuzo Shigematsu – also chairman of the Researching the effects of radiation -> RERF (web) in Hiroshima Institute.
He set up the limit of the dose for the resettlement and maximum values for contaminated food.


Source: ICRP: Protection of the Public in the Event of Major Radiation Accidents: Principles and Planing – ICRP Publication 40th Annuals of the ICRP, 14, no. 2. 1984
ICRP: Principles for intervention of Protection of the Public in a Radiological Emergency. ICRP Publication 63rd 1993

The IAEA has criticized the RCRP, they should apply the ICRP guidelines. This means that people relocating is unnecessary if the level of individual radiation mSv in the first year after an accident does not exceed 500. (ICRP 1984) If this dose is short, there are acute Radiations symptoms. 500 mSv are also equivalent of 1.7 km distance to Ground Zero in Hiroshima.
Nov. 1992: The ICRP INCREASED the dose for the evacuation in 1Sv – the equivalent to 1.3 km to the Hiroshima Ground Zero.

This means the continuation of nuclear power, even if people die.

1992: increased occupational radiation ICRP recommends to 0.05 Sv / year.
IAEA and WHO deny leukemia in connection with radiation.

1954 ICRP was an organisation of 13 male members.  Till 1990 the first woman came to them…

They made the recommendations for radiation protection norms, which were accepted by all countries, and which (very important!) justified the set of regulations of the IAEA. Interesting isn’t it? Here is one:
ICRP said, the tritium emission (from atomic power plants) in water should be 40.000 Bq. And now the crazy progress of the ICRP: In 1990 they said: Lets make 7000 Bq/ litre. This was proved by ACES (Comitee for environmental standards). They said: Wrong housenumber, change the 7000 (Because of cancer danger). They also said: Lower it to 100 Bq in five years until you get 20 Bq / Litre.

I think its a big difference between 40.000 and 20, don’t you?

That’s why we should never tolerate a number for low radiation emission from atomic power plants.

But the IAEA uses them in a very cruel way, since the Chernobyl reactor explosion in 1986. If you read through a paper from 1990 (called “Document Nr. 60 1990), written by the ICRP you find the description

“temporary radiation effect”.

Effects which they did not find heavy enough in order that the effected people can be compensated.

Japanese people hear it from Fukshima day One: “Panic and fear of radiation is much worse than radiation itself

This statement is used by the IAEA for Chernobyl victims.

The IAEA ignores cancer, leukemia, diabetes, trisomy 21, all kinds of illness, all kinds of cancer in connection with radiation, especially low radiation.

The IAEA calls it “Radiophobia”: http://www.iaea.org/inis/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/31/017/31017716.pdfthis is what Japan now uses for their anti radiation fear propaganda.

The present and future victims are perceived as a disturbance to the atomic industry, to the japanese government, to the companies running atomic plants. They are going to end it.

Since the foundation of the IAEA their purpose is: To serve and protect the atomic industry in these five countries: USA, Russia, China, France, Britain.

They also monopolized public health during and after atomic accidents, by the gag contract WHA 12-40 between them and the WHO (1959). SOURCE

ICRP totally gave up tp IAEA. IAEA is doing ICRP work today. And more: IAEA is selling the “peacefull atomic energy theory” worldwide. Although peaceful atomic reactos do develop low radiation (whose effects IAEA does try to deny) and weapon-ready Plutonium. It’s a BIG money game they are playing for decades and which will end hopefully soon (Uranium range: 60 years and below).

ICRP is NOT the organisation (in my opinion) which is in charge to protect the workers of the atomic industry. The ICRP does make down-the-lines and brings economic “imperative” into account. ICRP is not the advocator for radiation protection. Are there ICRP members who do have an apprenticeship in public health or industrial medicine?

More background: HOW MUCH RADIATION? http://www.ratical.org/radiation/KillingOurOwn/KOO12.html

ICRP members are profiteers of the atomic industry, just like the IAEA. Don’t expect to them to make radiation safety for YOU. This is an evidence that our modern society seems to have big problems.

Critique of ICRP structure and membership by Dr. Rosalie Bertel: http://ratical.org/radiation/inetSeries/wwc2_10.txt

“The Board (AECB Canada) relies heavily on the recommendations of international agencies and committees. Two of the most important of which are the ICRP and UNSCEAR.”

“The dominant expertise among ICRP  membership  between 1950  and  1985  was physicists, with one biophysicist (46.9% of the person years). ”

“Clearly when practically all members  are  in  the  pay  of their  respective governments, ICRP cannot claim to be free of all bias, conflict of interest or  government  pressure.”

Membership in ICRP appears to  be  made  on  the  basis  of occupational  affiliation  with  national  nuclear research (military  or  commercial)  and  regulatory  agencies.   It clearly  provides  a forum for dialogue on nuclear policies and standards  among  nations  with  a  clear  governmental standardize  their “story” relative to the health trade off (risks) of their nuclear activities (benefits).”

UNSCEAR, as all United Nations Agencies, is an organization of  delegates sent by member governments.  It does not make recommendations on radiological health and safety practices but serves primarily as an information gathering agency.

quotes by UNSCEAR from: http://ratical.org/radiation/CNR/NoSafeThresh.html / What Is Factually Wrong with This Belief:   “Harm from  Low-Dose Radiation Is Just Hypothetical — Not Proven”

“”The extent to which radiation-induced DNA damage may be correctly repaired at very low doses and very low dose rates is beyond the resolution of current experimental techniques. If DNA double-strand breaks are critical lesions determining a range of cellular responses, including perhaps neoplastic transformation, then it may be that wholly accurate cellular repair is unlikely even at the very low lesion abundance expected after low dose and low-dose-rate irradiation.”

UNSCEAR 1993 Report, p.634, para.74.”

“”It is highly unlikely that a dose threshold exists for the initial molecular damage to DNA, because a single track from any ionizing radiation has a finite probability of producing a sizable cluster of atomic damage directly in, or near, the DNA. Only if the resulting molecular damage, plus any additional associated damage from the same track, were always repaired with total efficiency could there be any possibility of a dose threshold for consequent cellular effects.”

UNSCEAR 1993 Report, p.636, para.84.”

“Biological effects are believed to arise predominantly from residual DNA changes that originate from radiation damage to chromosomal DNA. It is the repair response of the cell that determines its fate. The majority of damage is repaired, but it is the remaining unrepaired or misrepaired damage that is then considered responsible for cell killing, chromosomal aberrations, mutations, transformations and cancerous changes.”

UNSCEAR 1993 Report, p.680-681, para.323.”

“The BEIR Committees are heavily staffed with personnel from U.S.  Government  nuclear research laboratories such as Oak Ridge and Brookhaven, and with researchers from the  atomic bomb  research centers at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.  There is a greater breadth of expertise on the BEIR Committees  than on  ICRP  and  much  more  internal  dissent.  However, the Committee assumes an  adversarial  rather  than  scientific role. “

“The delegates to ICRP, UNSCEAR and  BEIR  chosen  by  their respective  governments  have  both  personal  and national compelling reason for perpetuating their  closed  structure and secrecy.”

Why BEIR VII (Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation) plays in the hand of atomic industry – quote “they rely on data from Hiroshima and Nagasaki to assess for low dose exposure in humans. BEIR VII is assessing continuous or routine low doses, but data from Hiroshima and Nagasaki are not adequate predictors of the full range of health effects for various types of exposure…”

Source: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/BEIR7pronuke.html

Excerpts from the book “No Immediate Danger, Prognosis for a Radioactive Earth, by Dr Rosalie Bertell ” (http://www.ratical.org/radiation/NRBE/NRBEtoc.html)

ICRP: More about Radiaton Protection Standards: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/NRBE/NRBE11.html

ICRP: Failure to Audit Health: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/NRBE/NRBE12.html

“Activists from Belarus and Germany arrested brutally at peaceful anti-nuclear action

Minsk, 25th April, 18.35 belarussian time. 6 activists from germany and 5 activists from Belarus, as well as one activist from Poland have been brutally arrested.

Around 40 activists have protested peacefully against the construction of the first nuclear power in Ostrovetz, Belarus. They held banners saying «Chernobyl, Fukushima — Ostrovets?» and «We are against nuclear power plants» and gave out leaflets. There were two flashmobs – the first lasted around 5 min.

However, the second flashmob was interrupted immediately. After around one minute two vehicles with civil police stopped, as well as a red prisoner’s transport. Peaceful protestors were thrown to the ground and arrested using brutal force.

Against all nuclear power installations! No newbuild of nuclear power plants — in Belarus or anywhere! Solidarity with political prisoners!


You think it’s only Japan and Belarus? Think again:

Tim DeChristopher’s Imprisonment: Our Call to Action! http://www.peacefuluprising.org/tim-dechristophers-imprisonment-our-call-to-action-20110726

France: Atomic Industry knows no freedom of speech: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/07/12/france-atomic-industry-knows-no-freedom-of-speech-the-epr-junk-reactor/

5,000,000 Beq/L is a quote by Dr Ian Fairlie (UK) from the Committee Examining Radiation Risks of Internal Emitters founded by UK Government in 2001– made public by the IPPNW (nobel peace prize 1985) on Sept.16th 2010. It’s common science now and not conspiracy: http://www.ippnw2010.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Press/WOZ_37_S5.pdf

This is a statement of the pro nuclear IAEASignificant activity of tritium is escaping into air by the way of the cooling towers” at: 4th Meeting WG7, 6 – 9 September 2010, Aix-en-Provence, France: http://www-ns.iaea.org/downloads/rw/projects/emras/emras-two/first-technical-meeting/fourth-working-group-meeting/working-group-presentations/workgroup7-presentations/presentation-4th-wg7-czech-npp.pdf

MORE: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/07/18/reactors-emitting-tritium-during-normal-mode-children-cancer/

quote by Dr. Rosalia Bertell, November 1999 issue of The Ecologist, pp. 408-411: http://ratical.org/radiation/NAvictims.html

The main way in which the “radiation protection industry” has succeeded in hugely underrating the ill-health caused by nuclear power is by insisting on a group of extremely restrictive definitions as to what qualifies as a radiation-caused illness statistic. For example, under IAEA’s criteria:

>    If a radiation-caused cancer is not fatal, it is not counted in the IAEA’s figures

>    If a cancer is initiated by another carcenogen, but accelerated or promoted by exposure to radiation, it is not counted.

>    If an auto-immune disease or any non-cancer is caused by radiation, it is not counted.

>    Radiation-damaged embryos or foetuses which result in miscarriage or stillbirth do not count

>    A congenitally blind, deaf or malformed child whose illnesses are are radiation-related are not included in the figures because this is not genetic damage, but rather is teratogenic, and will not be passed on later to the child’s offspring.

>    Causing the genetic predisposition to breast cancer or heart disease does not count since it is not a “serious genetic disease” in the Mendelian sense.

>    Even if radiation causes a fatal cancer or serious genetic disease in a live born infant, it is discounted if the estimated radiation dose is below 100 mSv [mSv= millisievert, a measurement of radiation exposure. One hundred millsievert is the equivalent in radiation of about 100 X-Rays].

>    Even if radiation causes a lung cancer, it does not count if the person smokes — in fact whenever there is a possibility of another cause, radiation cannot be blamed.

>    If all else fails, it is possible to claim that radiation below some designated dose does not cause cancer, and then average over the whole body the radiation dose which has actually been received by one part of the body or even organ, as for instance when radio-iodine concentrates in the thyroid. This arbitrary dilution of the dose will ensure that the 100 mSv cut-off point is nowhere near reached. It is a technique used to dismiss the sickness of Gulf War veterans who inhaled small particles of ceramic uranium which stayed in their lungs for more than two years, and in their bodies for more than eight years, irradiating and damaging cells in a particular part of the body.

war is going on.

It was made publicly known in 1953 when President Dwight D. Eisenhower declared war upon every citizen and human being with “The Peaceful Atom”. It was then further developed in 1954 with the first hydrogen bomb testing which changed the most important international program for radiation protection and compensation: THE ALARA PRINCIPLE: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/03/21/iaea-and-icrp-the-alara-principle/, the h bomb testing is the successor to the Hiroshima / Nagasaki testing (!). The BASE for ALL RADIATION LIMITS is the T65D Study (Tentative Dose Estimate compiled in 1965): http://www.rerf.or.jp/glossary_e/t65d.htm For validation of this study the US even did an atomic test in Nevada: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/212/4497/900.extract

The indirect chemical damage to cell membranes in the low dose range is much more important than the direct effect of radiation on the nucleus with its genetic material. In the nucleus there appears to be much stronger repair mechanisms than in the cell membranes. This is consistent with the purposes of evolution: Increasingly higher development of life. First and foremost, namely the genes in the nucleus had greatly developed by repair mechanisms to be protected. Only then could the nature of the gene pool protect itself against the highly damaging properties of natural radiation, and thus maintain the relative stability of species over millions of years.


> Petkau A. Effects of 22 Na + on phospholipid membrane injury to irradiated erythrocytes. Radiation Research 1968, 34:335-346.
>Sternglass EJ. Implication of dose-rate dependent cell-membrane damage for the biological effets of medical and environmental radiation. Proceedings of the symposium on population exposures, Knoxville TN, October 21-23, 1974. (CONF-741 018)

But in contrast to the gene pool, individual members of populations (plants, animals, people) for the evolution are not so important to the contrary, her constant death and her replacement by reproduction is an important evolutionary process. The repair mechanisms in the cell membranes were needed, but weren’t  so important, because you only caused diseases, but no genetic defects. And if one member of a population has fulfilled its evolutionary role of reproduction, sit is no longer needed, so a life extension beyond the reproductive age is also not absolutely necessary. This is for the survival of animals and plant species are not necessarily problematic, however, for human society. Each individual hopes to a long and healthy life, far beyond reproduction age. In addition, an adaptation to environmental toxic substances in humans is not possbile, because of the generational change phaes which are very long. But we add more radiation by atomic energy with it’s low radiation emission, accidents, catastrophes – which are peeks.




Read Full Post »


Japanese officals and WHO ignore irradiated Japanese Children

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for ALL JAPANESE: http://www.criirad.org/actualites/dossier2011/japon_bis/en_japonais/japonais.html

national meteorological and geophysical services in Austria LIVE MAP Cesium 137 release


Radiation Chart (might be unobjective and downplaying)

TEPCO radiation measurements – updated (might be unobjective and downplaying)

Radiation Effects Research Foundation Japan (Lists of Institutes related to health care for the radiation-exposes in Japan) (might be unobjective and downplaying)

Quake and Radiation graphs

Readings at Monitoring Post out of 20 Km Zone of Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP (might be unobjective and downplaying)


Technical Briefing of nuclear safety aspects of the situation in Japan

Quake tracker Map Japan


Six Fukushima liquidators were irradiated with 250 Millisievert on March 19th 2011 – after the radiation limit was increased to 250 Millisievert.  They got the radiation of 100 years! Thats the crone of irresponsibility. Atomic energy is a criminal energy against all kinds of life on the planet. And the IAEA got the peace noble prize in 2005.

older news:

Fuel rods are now exposed and ready for meltdown.
Workers are irradiated. New explosions heard.

Suppression pool may have been damaged at No. 2 reactor

SOURCE: http://english.kyodonews.jp/

An atomic cloud reached Tokyo in the morning of March 13th 2011.

NHK weather forecast doesn’t show radiation levels. You cannot rely on them.

Here are radiation measurements from March 13th 2011:

Block I Fukushima: 3/13/2011  more than 1 millisievert per hour.

At the Gate of Fukushima I: 3/12/2011 forenoon till explosion of building I: 1 milli-sievert per hour, then they dropped to 0,07 milli-sievert per hour


9:35 pm 760 micro sv/h, 9:37 pm 3130 micro sv/h, 10:15 pm 431 micro sv/h and 10:35 pm 326 micro sv/h

03/14/11: 2 am: 3100 micro sievert

Normal exposure is: 2 milli-sievert per YEAR and there you have 1 milli-sievert per HOUR

GET AWAY! The radiation is 60.000 times higher than normal!

Normal radiation: 0,05 micro sievert per hour * 24 * 365 makes 438 micro sievert. Per Year.

The 2 milli sievert are made out of external radiation and other radiation sources, like Radon for example.

Divide 3000 micro sievert per hour through 0,05 micro sievert per hour – you get 60.000

The officials are down playing this crisis. GET AWAY

Low doses can lead to cancer. Especially Leukaemia after radiation exposes children are born. It damages the embryo. KiKK Study



Discovered by Abraham Petkau, 1972, Whitshell at the Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (web).

He discovered:

that 26 RAD per Minute (fast radiation rate) need a total dose of 3500 RAD to harm a cell membrane.

with 0,001 RAD per Minute (slow dose) only 0,7 RAD are needed to harm a cell membrane.

The Mechanism behind it:

The production of free radicals of Oxygen (O² with a negative electric charge) caused by ionising effect of the radiation.

The free radicals caused by the slow dose (0,001) are sparsely distributed radicals do have a higher chance to reach the cell membranes.


The free radicals of the fast radiation rate (26) are tight together and so they react faster with each other.

The low electric charge of the cell membranes attract the free radicals in the early state of the reaction (minor total dose).

If the harmed cells are monocytes this will cause:

Anemia, because the monocytes recycle 37 – 40 % of the iron of dying red blood cells.

Weakened immune system in the cells, because the monocytes generate the substance which activates the immune system of the lymphocytes.

This is the so called “Bura Bura” – of Hiroshima and Nagasaki survivors.




This is the  NEW  Livestream of NHK japanese Televison. and the english translation

More Japan Information

More Chernobyl Information

Wind: Japan – USA map

IEA wants 1,300 new atomic power plants (32 each year)




Read Full Post »


It’s 25 Chernobyl years.

25 Years of lies by the IAEA and the WHO.

25 years of suffering.With still more than 2 million people living in contaminated areas in Belarus. 1000.000 Children are ill.

Therefore, the Federal Working Agency Chernobyl (web) of Germany organizes a bus tour through Europe:


The trip will consist of three stages:

  1. Minsk Garden of Hope: The peace tour starts and ends in Minsk in the “Garden of Hope” where vigils (sit-ins) and candle burning actions will take place on the commemoration day. Byelorussian participants as well as organizers will assemble in Minsk and international participants can join at this point. The Foundation “The Children of Chernobyl” is responsible for the organization and program of the trip and will decide on the itinerary. If possible, a group of animators should be included.
  2. Intermediate stops: bus of the foundation will transport us. En route, people can join, for example, in Poland, Germany, Benelux countries, Switzerland, among others. If there are not enough places, there will be an additional bus. Stops will be made where initiatives have taken to invite the group. The organizers in these places are responsible for lodging – in families, youth hostels and other places – and for a program – possibly with guests (where donations can be requested), for ex.: memorial services, vigils (sit-ins), laying of wreaths, memorial unveilings, etc.
    Reports from “witnesses” – this does not only include guests from Byelorussia but also local people, parents, teachers, doctors, local authorities who were responsible at that time, on how they witnessed the shock of Chernobyl, in towns, schools, etc.
    Reading literature on Chernobyl, possibly by authors, people who are known in the area, in churches, schools etc., at a “reading night” with Chernobyl cultural events with guests – theater, music, exhibitions, etc. Special actions: Theatre in pedestrian zones, paintings, and a display of the ‘Chernobyl candle’, catastrophe exercise, stock of milk powder for infants distributed in little bags, ‘mushroom’ soups, nuclear chain reactions, etc.
    In any case, the reason and aim of the “Peace Journey through Europe” in April 2011, should be made clear through reports, media, etc.
    The return trip could be similar.
  3. Meeting place Geneva: Aim and meeting place is Geneva, with a participation in the (memorial) vigil (sit-in) on 26 April 2011 in front of the WHO – also for those who arrive by private car, bicycle, on foot, tractor, etc. Accommodation: Youth hostel in Geneva and surroundings, hotels, or private homes, etc. The Federal Association of ‘ For the Children of Chernobyl’ in Germany) will be responsible for preparation and organization.
    An international group should already join the participants in Minsk.
  4. Invitation to the federal government / German Greens in the federal state “Niedersachsen”:

Candle actions everywhere
with the symbol of the Chernobyl candle

The “Chernobyl candle” is the center of all candle actions. It reminds and warns everyone in a peaceful way and cannot be overlooked. Everybody
can take part in such an action by placing a candle in the window to remember together with host families the Chernobyl disaster:

  • for all who have become victims of this ‘invisible war’, who suffer from it and have to carry the consequences for the children of Chernobyl as well as
  • for all children whose lives have been and will be destroyed through atomic action
  • for our friends and partners in Byelorussia
  • for all courageous and engaged people who oppose the atomic threat and who stand up for life
  • for the participants of the ‘peace journey’
  • for a world without atomic threat – each nuclear power plant is a potential atomic bomb
  • for free access to medical data and information without any hesitation, imposed silence, according to the statutes of the WHO
  • for people who do not withdraw from their responsibility
  • for bridges of humanitarian cooperation
  • for..
  • for..

Where there is church involvement, Western Easter (24./25.04.2011) could be a focal point with the use of the Easter candle.


The WHO constitution describes 22 actions which are to enable it to obtain its medical goals. One can read that it is mandatory to give the widest possible information on health problems to the population so that it can come to its own conclusions.


The main goal of the IAEO is ”to accelerate and promote the nuclear industry for peace, health and well-being of the whole world”. Almost
by way of parenthesis it is underlined that the IAEA is also accountable for health in the field of nuclear industry.

The contract of 1959

The main point of the contract between WHO and IAEO: No public information on health problems when could influence the development of nuclear industry.

This commitment to keep secrecy is however totally against the WHO statutes which state that the public be informed. Consequently, it seems that the world is being kept in the dark concerning risks from the nuclear industry or, so to say, protected from the truth. It will still be worse when it comes to information and protective measures regarding the expected waste from the nuclear industry, as was in the case after Chernobyl, because first of all the promoters of nuclear power plants will be financially protected (Prof. Dr. M. Fernex, France).

“The peak of the number of concerned persons will only be visible by 2016. The heritage of Chernobyl will accompany us and our children,
for generations” (Kofi Annan, former U.N. general secretary). He surely has the information from WHO. We want to know this, too

To tell the truth

1. Unforgettable is the date of 26 April 1986. It was with horror that all of Europe observed what happened in the former Soviet Union: The unimaginable, the ‘GAU’ of a nuclear power plant, a super-GAU – bigger than the greatest imaginable accident. This horror was called Chernobyl. Europe was scared, fear over the children, helplessness, what shall we do, what are we allowed to eat, how can we protect ourselves? Europe was lucky. Immediately affected however were the regions around the nuclear reactor in the Ukraine, Russia and in large parts of White Russia/Belarus. However, nothing of all this was known in the beginning. There was nothing but silence, repression, bluff. The then politbureau of the USSR had ordered silence. Silence was maintained by all means.

Europe, however, should remember and hear the warning.

2. Only the civil movement could and would not be silent. On its very own it wanted to find out. It informed its own population and the world at large. It tried to make known this disaster by involving the media, by ways of scientific congresses, with civil rights’ engagement, to bring Glasnost and Perestroika into the disaster. It organized immediate aid for children and for the people in the heavily affected regions. A world-wide network of self-help and humanitarian cooperation developed – marked by international solidarity with the courageous people who took their fate into their own hands, who broke through the silence, who brought light into the darkness. It is the civil rights movement who up to this date carries out international humanitarian programs and who, in deep solidarity, stands on the side of the afflicted and engaged people. It is the international citizens movement who over and over again calls for the truth – particularly today, 25 years after the ‘Chernobyl’ disaster. This memory moves between the two poles: solidarity and truth. We need free information and medical data over ‘Chernobyl’. The real situation at that time and today must be transparent and made known.

3. After a short democratic opening in Belarus, silence has again been installed. The silence has an international dimension. The silence which had once been ordered by the politbureau of the Communist party of the Soviet Union is today being steered by the IAEO. The IAEO is subordinate to the U.N. Security Council where the five leading nuclear powers have the word. The whole military-industrial nuclear complex wants ‘Chernobyl’ forgotten. The nuclear lie is, not the least, the result of the agreement of 1959 between two U.N. organizations: the IAEO and the WHO. As to nuclear issues, the WHO is only allowed to publish what is agreed to with the IAEO. There have already been publications that had to be destroyed, and congresses had to be cancelled. This is how in the end physicists and politicians decide over what medical doctors have to say.

Remembering and Reminding

WHO has an enormous amount of medical documentation, data and information with regard to ‘Chernobyl’ and to the whole nuclear program. However, silence is the order. Facts and data cannot be obtained anymore. The IAEO declares today as it did in 1986 “Chernobyl is not that bad” – only 31 dead and – in the meantime they admitted that there are some cases of thyroid cancer in children. IAEO even starts a counter attack: What is really bad is how one speaks about Chernobyl. Many negative initiatives create insecurity among people and make them depend on outside support, plunging them into apathy and poverty.

The ‘atomic lie’ then leads to a direct battle against civil society – not only in Belarus. Much has in the meantime been destroyed. Humanitarian cooperation is constantly being threatened and hindered. The more necessary is the call for truth.

4. One should remember that ‘Chernobyl’ does not belong in a museum but remains a constant challenge today and tomorrow: To stand for the cause of free access to all necessary information, for an “independent WHO”, that the agreement of 1959, which leaves people to suffer, be suppressed, that silence be broken, that the truth about the consequences of Chernobyl for life and health be put on the table, that the whole dimension for man and environment become visible. Because the medical records will show that for a long time to come ‘Chernobyl’ is not over, it continues to threaten the people in Belarus, Russia, the Ukraine, Europe. Genetic consequences cannot yet be estimated. The atomic lie is like an octopus that spreads its deadly arms over humanity, like cancer which starts to grow and forms metastases. The whole Chernobyl work depends on medical data and facts. For its humanitarian programs, it depends essentially on up-to-date information on radioactive emissions, on the consequences of nuclear contaminaon and the health situation. Whoever accepts the “atomic lie” makes civil movements and humanitarian cooperation loses ground, and leaves children and the weakest to their fate.

5. At the same time, ‘Chernobyl’ is a symbol for taking the wrong path and for the disaster of the whole military-industrial nuclear program. Silence, bluff, repression, is worldwide. The consequences are incalculable.

6. For many years, vigils (sit-ins) for an independent WHO on a local and international level, take place in Geneva in front of WHO. Chernobyl is constantly being remembered and the truth about the ‘nuclear lie’ is being remembered. They need support, especially also from Germany. German initiatives are missing here. The 26th of April 2011 therefore offers the possibility to participate in Geneva in these vigils (sit-ins) to protest against the ‘nuclear lie’ and to make visible these events and actions. The “peace journey through Europe” and candle action will serve this aim.

For further information: www.independentwho.info

An additional Chernobyl Congress will be held in Berlin, Germany by the IPPNW (PSR in the U.S.) more information HERE




Read Full Post »

Warning to all pregnant women in Japan: Get away! 20 – 30 Km is not enough!

Children should stay in the flat during fallout, for 2 weeks! Or should be evacuated to southern Japan.


IAEA, UNCESCO, ICRP: Playing down radiation in Fukushima and Chernobyl is scientifically valid


All recommendations for radiation emssion out of atomic power plants are based on a healthy mature 34 / 35 year old human.

This is called REFERENCE MAN

But what happens if you do not take a mature human as a default for limit values.

What if you choose a HUMAN EMBRYO

The answer is ZERO. This is called REFERENCE EMBRYO.

PDF / Downloadable Review of Risks from Tritium. Report of the independent Advisory Group on Ionising Radiation HERE

and HERE <- How Tritium makes children sick (in German)

List of downloadable documents by Prof. Pflugbeil, Germany HERE

And this is why IAEA, WHO and ICRP close their eyes: HERE and HERE

More here and here

Press releases by operator TEPCO (offline March 13th 2011)

This is the Livestream of japanese NHK Broadcast. It is now offline. Here is the NEW one.

This is how a General Electric BWR reactor like Fukushima looks from the inside: PHOTOS

This is the webcam of Fukushima HERE – updated per hr. It is now online again. During the explosion of block 1, it was offline.

The pressure tank is not damaged, but the meltdown will do it.

This is the Wind map – Japan USA

Reference Embryo Information was sent to the Comission on Radiological Protection Germany (web) by the IPPNW (web) two weeks before xmas 2009. No decision yet.

What comes out of cooling towers at atomic power plants?

Steam PLUS Tritium (heavy water, Beta emitter)

In a radius of 5 – 10 km around every atomic power plant PREGNANT women’s embryos are exposed to that.

Around / before/ after the 10th pregnancy week Tritium / beta radiation harms the cell information, when inhaled and transported to the embryo itself. It does not cause a pregnancy abortion, mind you. But after the child is born, and let’s say 2, 3 years are gone, this child is likely to get blood cancer.You should ask your gynecologist about this and leave the area if you want to have a child.

The atomic power plant operators publish only averages of Tritium emissions. This convincing, with those numbers it is possible the camouflage high emissions or even accidents. You can not rely on that.

Dr. Ian Fairlie is an independent scientist who researches on this sector. More HERE

Read all about it HERE and HERE, in the German KiKK Study – released by the Federal Radation Agency (web HERE) in 2007. Children living in a 5 km radius around German atomic power plants do have a higher cancer risc. It is scientific and confirmed in professional circles.

Explosion in Fukushima 1 confirmed SOURCE

After the 8.9 earthquake on March 11th 2011, 3000 people have been evacuated living around the atomic power plant Fukushima. The emergency cooling system was running on battery mode.

Fukushima Nr.2 (12 km from Nr.1) is now also without cooling system. The Government evacuates everyone within 20 miles. Chernobyl was and is 30 miles – because 30 miles zone was used during the atomic bomb tests in the U.S. 30 miles is pretty useless, because the wind blows the radioactivity thousands of miles away.


Photos 1 and Photos 2 (Before and after)

In June 2008 Fukushima was also damaged by an earthquake and fire HERE

In July 2007 there was a fire in the Kashiwazaki atomic power plant HERE

TOSHIBA announced In June 2008 that they want to build 65 new atomic reactors SOURCE the Stocks of TOSHIBA went DOWN on March 15th 2011 by 20%.

When an accident happens (an atomic reactor crash, for example) the whole point of Status Quo is that the people are contaminated with radiation.

By the ALARA principle you have to prove that the money you are going to spent to lower the radiation exposure does advance peoples health.

Read about it HERE (ALARA, ICRP and atomic reactor CRASH)

Now, after radioactive steam has built up – and the operators released it, the pressure has built up one and a half the time allowed (yesterday).

The reactor is built for a quake of 8.25. The latest quake was 8.9.

Japan plans to build 14 new atomic reactors until 2030. They already have 54.

The radioactivity has risen one thousand times. Backup generators are not working. SOURCE

Japan was hit by another quake of 6.6 afterwards.

Atomic power is a big risc for everyone. It is not safe.

There is no peaceful atom.

WHO and IAEA are going to ignore the consequnces of the atomic power plant catastrophe in Japan:

from independentwho.info:

The World Health Organisation (WHO) is failing in its duty to protect the victims of radioactive contamination.

Daily messurements for the Federal Agency for Radiation Protection Germany

Fukushima [map] reactor building1 is completely destroyed, Meltdown has begun. 03/11/11  Source

11 atomic reactors were shut down, five of them were allowed to spread radioactive water steam. 03/11/11

3 people in Kyodo are contaminated. Myagi [map] is contaminated 03/12/11

160 people are contaminated. Reactor 3 is out of control. 03/13/11

Emergency at Onagawa [map] atomic power plant . 03/13/11

Eruption at Shinmoedake vulcano [map] . 03/13/11

Cooling system offline at Tokai [map] atomic power plant. 03/13/11

210,000 people flee the area of Fukushima. 03/13/11

Explosion in Fukushima reactor 3. 11 people wounded. Radiation rising. 03/14/11

Cooling system in Fukushima reactor 2 offline. 03/14/11

Seawater is pumped into Fukushima reactor 2, but it the water level drops. 03/14/11

Fueling rods of Fukushima reactor 2 are without water. Meltdown warning for three of four reactors. 03/14/11

5 workers radiation exposed, two wounded at Fukushima reactor 1. And the reactor is without cooling water again. 03/14/11

WHO tells the people that there is no harm to health. READ HERE WHY. 03/14/11

Big explosion in Ibaraki reactor 2 between Tokio and Fukushima. 03/15/11

Fukshima fuel rods 1 seem to melt. 03/15/11

Fukushima reactor 4 burning. 03/15/11

Radiation nine times higher in Tokio. 03/15/11

Fukushima: 400 milli sievert per hour acc. to IAEA. 03/15/11

Condition of the 50 workers at Fukushima unknown. 03/15/11

Flight ban over Fukushima. 03/15/11

Increased radation at U.S. naval personnel. 03/15/11

Yukio Edano: Cooling of Fukushima reactor 5 and 6 faulty. 03/15/11

Prefecture Yamagata has shelters. 03/15/11

Water in decay pool of Fukushima is boiling. 03/15/11

According to French atomic agency Fukushima is INES 6 (Chernobyl was INES 7) Source. Japan gives it a 4. 03/15/11

Radiation to high for workers at Fukushima plant. 03/15/11  Source

Helicopters shall drop water above Fukushima. 03/15/11

Helicopters stopped – too dangerous because of high radiation. 03/16/11

No water in cooling pond of Fukushima reactor 4. 03/16/11

U.S. says Japan must install a 80 km evac zone, not only 30 km. 03/16/11

Temperatures rise in Fukushima reactor 5 and 6. 03/16/11

Japan will stop selling food from Fukushima region.  Spinach and milk are contaminated. 03/19/11

Tochigi region: Spinach high contaminated. 03/19/11

Video copyright by



Read Full Post »