Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘CTBTO’

17098093_1286955404726420_2200176157965570779_o

Right now a one billion USD lawsuit is opened by irradiated and damaged soldiers, who were on the USS Reagan during the Venting of TECPO’s reactors:

http://norcalrecord.com/stories/511141853-sailors-1-billion-lawsuit-over-radiation-from-fukushima-nuclear-disaster-sails-through-federal-court

Also, Chris Busby is right now in San Francisco, developing a strategy to help these sailors infront of court. He is one of last remaining experts actually doing something for the human race. More on his profile:

https://www.facebook.com/chris.busby.714?fref=mentions

Don Gabel died in the first proven case of radiation-caused cancer at Rocky Flats, in the 1970ies: https://books.google.de/books?id=YIAzHckpZswC&pg=PA3#v=onepage&q&f=false

What I want to add are examples from Chernobyl, the cancer categories, the model of when a cancer is radiation induced, a similar case from the U.S., and data linked to the USS Reagan and TEPCO’s VENTING.

melt-dissolve-vent

Latest: NO FUEL FOUND! But Control Rods! HERE: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2017/07/25/tepco-found-the-control-rods-not-fuel/

17191754_1286986068056687_98755878022666238_o

“Dr. Mettler (IAEA) learned well that solid cancers without a ten year latency period did not “count” as radiation-related under ICRP latency models. Therefore the Chernobyl thyroid cancers were seen, but not reported as radiogenic, since they were within five years of a disaster! The nuclear industry has a monopoly on radiation and human health scientific information, and its dissemination through the Universities into nuclear reactor facilities, hospital radiology laboratories and UN organizations. This poses a further serious problem. Normally, one believes the evidence at hand, rather than the theory! If one has been taught theory as fact, the situation becomes more complicated. ICRP has created an artificial “consensus” on the health effects of radiation” from: https://ratical.org/radiation/Chernobyl/CaUFtH.html

stage-show2

Concering Three Mile Island, from: https://ratical.org/radiation/NAvictims.html

Restrictive Definitions

The main way in which the “radiation protection industry” has succeeded in hugely underrating the ill-health caused by nuclear power is by insisting on a group of extremely restrictive definitions as to what qualifies as a radiation-caused illness statistic. For example, under IAEA’s criteria:

  • If a radiation-caused cancer is not fatal, it is not counted in the IAEA’s figures
  • If a cancer is initiated by another carcenogen, but accelerated or promoted by exposure to radiation, it is not counted.
  • If an auto-immune disease or any non-cancer is caused by radiation, it is not counted.
  • Radiation-damaged embryos or foetuses which result in miscarriage or stillbirth do not count
  • A congenitally blind, deaf or malformed child whose illnesses are are radiation-related are not included in the figures because this is not genetic damage, but rather is teratogenic, and will not be passed on later to the child’s offspring.
  • Causing the genetic predisposition to breast cancer or heart disease does not count since it is not a “serious genetic disease” in the Mendelian sense.
  • Even if radiation causes a fatal cancer or serious genetic disease in a live born infant, it is discounted if the estimated radiation dose is below 100 mSv [mSv= millisievert, a measurement of radiation exposure. One hundred millsievert is the equivalent in radiation of about 100 X-Rays].
  • Even if radiation causes a lung cancer, it does not count if the person smokes — in fact whenever there is a possibility of another cause, radiation cannot be blamed.
  • If all else fails, it is possible to claim that radiation below some designated dose does not cause cancer, and then average over the whole body the radiation dose which has actually been received by one part of the body or even organ, as for instance when radio-iodine concentrates in the thyroid. This arbitrary dilution of the dose will ensure that the 100 mSv cut-off point is nowhere near reached. It is a technique used to dismiss the sickness of Gulf War veterans who inhaled small particles of ceramic uranium which stayed in their lungs for more than two years, and in their bodies for more than eight years, irradiating and damaging cells in a particular part of the body.

This is what they go against. But Sciences changes, as Busby said on facebook.

Another category, no one knows: The IAEA says only the first seven days of a nuclear catastrophe count as an accident. How is that possible, if you look at the decay times of radionuclides and the genetic long term effect? Well, it sure helps the government to re populate the areas, make compensation claims small and fake some radiation maps as public service, against the panic makers:

11722157_862633310491967_4261527797011097163_o

 

nomeltdown-2

It all is also linked to the “Meltdown” term. I believe it was VENTING. And that there is no core, no molten core anywhere, not inside, not below. Show me a single pic of molten fuel. Anything, since 2011. There is nothing.

Here below are NRC trans script snapshots, the big one is about the USS Reagan.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Let me explain:

We must accept that the large amounts of nuclear material, or almost everything, has left the reactors. Not tiny amounts as TEPCO and IAEA Vienna / JAEC Japan say. We must concentrate the clues contradicting the meltdown. If one gets off here, one is not interested in the truth. There is data from SPEEDI, CTBTO, TEPCO, and JAEC data from Germany and Norway, which shows that enormous amounts have escaped. So much that not a meltdown could have been the source. BECAUSE it says in the text book, that a meltdown is equivalent to 2 – 5% of the total inventory that exists in a reactor. A number, a theory, not reality. From which all radiation maps and evac zones are calculated, including possible damage compensation, and also this case against TEPCO.

 

 

 

 

 

 

I think almost 100 % escaped. From all three reactors. There is solid confirmation for this claim: From Futaba to the USS Reagan, infront of Tokyo bay, to Takasaki 200 miles away – they were all irradiated with radionuclides, more than ever in human history (the CTBTO RN 38 station was shut down to be decontaminated).

Excerpt:

“Two stations of the CTBTO network, Okinawa and Takasaki, are located in Japan, but 133Xe (XENON) measurements are made only at Takasaki. However, the Takasaki noble gas detections were, for an extended period of time, reaching the dynamic range of the system, meaning that measurements were so high that they became unreliable. Regarding the 137Cs (CESIUM) measurements at Takasaki, there was another problem:”

“During the first passage of the plume at this station, radioactivity entered the interior of the building. This resulted in a serious contamination, meaning that 137Cs shows up continuously in the measurements since the initial event, even when it is completely absent in the ambient air.”

“Both stations are part of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO) – The Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) foresees a global ban of all nuclear explosions. To verify compliance with the CTBT, a global International Monitoring System (IMS) with four different measurement technologies is currently built up, namely for seismic (170 stations), hydroacoustic (11 stations), infrasound (80 stations) and radionuclide (80 stations) monitoring. 60 particulate monitoring stations are currently delivering data to the International Data Centre of the Preparatory Commission for the CTBTO in Vienna.”

Source: http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/12/2313/2012/acp-12-2313-20

Did you know? Even world’s most advanced measurement system gives data about emissions only after 2 – 3 days. Here is a list of CTBTO stations which catched radioactive atoms from the TEPCO reactors, in chronological order (bottom of the page, german language) The following stations have actually been able to detect radionuclides. Translation: “The activity concentrations measured outside Japan with the extremely sensitive IMS systems are very small and are partly in the range of the detection threshold. The simulated time of arrival can not be evaluated precisely because the IMS radionuclide stations measure particles in a three-day crypt: The plants suck air through a filter for 24 hours, after which the sample decays for 24 hours to reduce the background by short-lived isotopes And the energy of decay is counted and counted for a further 24 hours in a gamma spectrometer. The results are therefore always available two to three days after the measurement. Within this accuracy, however, the modeled arrival times were mostly confirmed. Detections up to and including March 25th 2011″: https://www.bgr.bund.de/DE/Themen/Erdbeben-Gefaehrdungsanalysen/Seismologie/Kernwaffenteststopp/Verifikation/Atmosphaer-Transport/Besondere%20Ereignisse/atm_fukushima_inhalt.html

Not possible by a simple meltdown. Then the other confirmation: The plant site still exists. Why is this important? The reactors operated with pressure containments, BWR type. But TEPCO and JAEC confirmed that their fuel rods were 100% dry, on March 14th 6 pm. Much pressure was building up. In a pressurized system (!). But it was not blown to pieces. It should have been beacause of the pressure building up. Only the burst protection around the containment was. Why is that? Why is the plant site still there? A good question. It should have been exploded just like the pressure cooker bomb during the marathon in the U.S. The architecture of reactors consists of many valves and safety pressure relief systems. Some are spring designed, to give out a “Puff” from time to time, and with it radionuclides, despite the active coal filters.

This one comes from: https://de.scribd.com/document/93660119/Fukushima-Disaster-March-11th-March-21st-NRC-ET-Chronology-Descending-Pages-From-C142487-03X

A short summary:

~~ From MELT to VENT ~~
or: how to dissolve fuel pellets and make them ready for venting
NRC: “IF CONTAINMENT PRESSURE WORSENS,
WILL NEED TO _VENT_ TO PREVENT CATASTROPHIC FAILURE”
VENTED PRIMARY CONTAINMENT!
heat capacity limit suppression pool (saturated!)
Reduced pressure by 50% = VENTING! (120 to 60 psi, means 50% of the pressure, steam, dissolved fuel pellets are OUT and AWAY)
Caldicott, Gundersen, Gunter, Naoto the coward & Co, where are you?
Remember, if you say “Meltdown”; you say “3 to 5 % fuel escaped

Opening Valve to inject seawater. By opening valve dissolved fuel pellets escape. Thus the dose around the reactor is increased. Naval base receives evacuation worth doses in their air an sepa filter. Tokio is between that base and the venting reactors. No evavuation. USS Reagan again mentioned. Also not evacuated. This all happaned with intent and lazyness and typical, “sane” and rational calculus behaviour those always show who are top trained and “responsible”. UO2 fuel escaped, parts of spent fuel escaped also, 38 milli Sievert per hour, 100 mili Sievert per hour, 400 milli Sievert per hour.

 

 

 

 

 

 

“To justify venting or purging, there must be an established need to improve working conditions” JUSTIFICATION: Avoiding explosion of the containment: https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/gen-comm/gen-letters/1979/gl79054.html

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

But when the reactors became dry – all three (!) – TEPCO melted, vented, melted, vented, controlled, over days. To the outside. There is no molten core anywhere, “falling” into the sea, as some dreamers say. TEPCO even drilled holes from outside into the burst protection, to relief the system. But when hundreds of tons of MOX / UO2 fuel melt, no space is enough to catch it. A dry reactor heats up with 212°F per 0,1 seconds. Means it reaches its melting temperature 5,072°F in 2,8 seconds. Then its in the molten form. But is does not stop there. But that is the limit of most people’s imagination power. TEPCO knows this. It vaporizes, aerolizes. And at the bottom of a molten core a critical mass is possible, because the neutrons are no longer catched by water. The splitting rate races. And the pressure rises with the temperature. What did TEPCO do? VENTING. Until the system could not hold any longer, the system was overrun by it, and the space went out in the torus / dry well and even the chimney wasnt enough. Cracks and vessel breached, as photos and gamma cams have shown. Pipes were sucked flat, instead of blown to pieces. There are photos.

Then we can read about the 400 mSv per hour measuerd near the plant (“There was a media report of a 40-rem dose measured somewhere near the plant.”) quote from NRC on PAGE 15: http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1205/ML12052A106.pdf

Gregory Jaczko was informed about the venting of TEPCO reactors in the NRC document ML12052A099.pdf. What did he know, what did he do? Venting reactor containment means letting it fly – to the people. THIS is NOT a meltdown. The reactors are empty. Scanner pics of TEPCO show this. How can this be a meltdown? http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1205/ML12052A099.pdf

What I mean with Reactor Fuel Enthalpy (TEPCO never shows anything like this, to avoid questions about the so called meltdown): “Prompt fuel dispersion was observed at radial average peak fuel enthalpies above 275 cal/g UO2- Tests at greater than 400 cal/g UO2 produced more severe consequences, with resultant coolant pressure increases to 12 MPa, energy conversions to nearly 3%, and metal-water reaction to nearly 100%of the cladding.” There is also data about melting and fragmentation. Remember: Chernobyl 1,400 cal/g (!!!) There was nothing melting anymore, it became gaseaous. SOURCE PDF: http://www.iaea.org/inis/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/12/581/12581572.pdf

SOARCA / MACCS2: “Accident Consequence Analysis Code: The computer code used to calculate dispersion of radioactive material to the environment and the population.” http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/research/safetycodes.html

cherno-fuku-msv-comp

This is a video from Chernobyl 4 for comparsion, to understand the TEPCO air dose date below. According to Alexandr Kupnyi, who made the footage, near the elephant foot is an air dose of 2 – 3 röntgen per hour. so 0,01 – 0,02 Sievert per hour. 10 – 20 milli SIevert per hour. And the dose rate at Fukushima coast, during venting was 60 – 110 milli Sievert per hour.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hundr

 

eds of sievert per hour were measured, causing 100 mill Sievert per hour air dose infront of Fukushima coast line. I think 3 x 16 billion curie escaped. The radioactivity of 3,000 Hiroshima bombs. We are not dead, because it left the building as tiniest pieces of itself, available everywhere to everyone, showing up NOT in the immediate offspring, because the effects are not dominant enough in DNA. That makes it impossible to track down, but will be the death for millions over the next generations. Many simple can not propagate, for example, because the cells / glands responsible are among the most vunerable in the human body. What I add is this: Since this industry was born and is fed by the military, no price is too high. TEPCO scales readings down when people enter. But scale it up, when robots enter. They switch off their Toys R Us Robots, and call it “killed” by radiation, to support their meltdown theory. In order the industry survives and people never know that a full and complete fuel loss is possible by VENTING, and that this emergency system is everywhere, in each reactor worldwide. This is also the reason why we have NEVER SEEN and will never see any fuel sample grabbed by a camera or robot, from TEPCO’s reactors, Because if we could see it we could estimate the fuel enthalpy, the energy deposited into the fuel and from then on we could explain the nature of the catastophe and fuel loss. TEPCO would risk their meltdown theory. I repeat: NO evidence was ever shown to the world, supporting the meltdown. And this is why we should find the regulations for operating reactors in Japan. For example in the UK Safety Assessment Principle 152 requires ‘The containment should adequately contain such radioactive matter as may be released into it as a result of any fault in the reactor.’ If a reactor VENTS its core almost completely to the outside, licence can not be granted and operation of reactors become instant ILLEGAL. But since this step is not done by clinging to the meltdown, Japan will switch on their reactors, one by one. And we watch. And this lawsuit will fail then, because it was only a meltdown and so the radiation can’t and couldn’t be so high, in TEPCO’s eyes.

“The licensing basis calculations for a control rod drop accident predict a peak fuel rod enthalpy of about 220 calories/gram when the inserted reactivity is 1.3% K. (…) When the core is reflooded, about half the core will undergo a cold water reactivity transient. (…) every fuel rod in the core would be perforated. I(…) the effect of the transient on the fuel matrix itself. (-..) Reflooding the reactor will insert about 8% K, when filled with cold water (with xenon present). However, it takes about 30 seconds to refill the vessel from the bottom to the top of the core (…) it is likely that there will be at least some severe fuel damage in the region where the control rods do not insert. As a shutdown core is reflooded, individual fuel rods, now at a high surface temperature, will first experience film boiling and then “quench” as the cladding temperature drops and the rod transitions into nucleate boiling (…) Source: https://www.nrc.gov/sr0933/Section%203.%20New%20Generic%20Issues/080r4.html

Again, Facts are Facts:

no AC power, lost all injection capability, trouble controlling their SRV. I asked ‘ what was the vessel pressure? The guy told me it was 4 megapascals, and all they got are fire pumps. And there’s no way a fire pump is going to push against 4 megapascals.”
Tony: ‘we’re concerned they’ve been in the situation on and off really from the beginning and they’ve been having trouble getting injection all along… very likely, also drawing, you know, it’s also leading us to this conclusion.”
pg 276
“… when you said ‘a loud sound’ ….would be it was probably when the core went x-up.”
Tony: “and landing in the water under the vessel, it would have caused a little steam explosion.”
Jack Grobb: “ But what you think is that that was a steam explosion from the fuel going x-vessel, and we heard that containment at that point in time went from 3 atmospheres to 1 atmosphere.”
Jim: “That makes sense.”
Tony: “Yep. It would.”
ET Transcripts #4 of 10 –14 March 2011
http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1205/ML12052A105.pdf

 

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

TEPCO02

“The dilemma for the victims is that they have to ask TEPCO, the very same company which caused this huge damage, how to fill up the thick and complicated application form to receive compensation. It is a long, painful procedure to get compensation.” – See more at: http://fukushimaontheglobe.com/the-earthquake-and-the-nuclear-accident/damage-compensations#sthash.GHgVYpHc.dpuf

A Reactor Containment = Pressure Cooker.
All containment type reactors enclose their core under pressure. During emergency this means: Phase transition for fuel into microparticles and gaseous leve – into the wild! Stop all containment type reactors now! The Meltdown theory was invented to let them run amok. Sounds so good, fight? “Meltdown”- but it is a lie.

“NHK admitted pieces of fuel rods and reactor vessels blasted to at least Ibaraki to contain Uranium & Zirconium”: http://fukushima-diary.com/2014/08/nhk-admitted-pieces-fuel-rods-reactor-vessels-blasted-least-ibaraki-contain-uranium-zirconium/

“Two stations of the CTBTO network, Okinawa and Takasaki, are located in Japan, but 133Xe (XENON) measurements are made only at Takasaki. However, the Takasaki noble gas detections were, for an extended period of time, reaching the dynamic range of the system, meaning that measurements were so high that they became unreliable. Regarding the 137Cs (CESIUM) measurements at Takasaki, there was another problem:”

“During the first passage of the plume at this station, radioactivity entered the interior of the building. This resulted in a serious contamination, meaning that 137Cs shows up continuously in the measurements since the initial event, even when it is completely absent in the ambient air.”

“Both stations are part of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO) – The Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) foresees a global ban of all nuclear explosions. To verify compliance with the CTBT, a global International Monitoring System (IMS) with four different measurement technologies is currently built up, namely for seismic (170 stations), hydroacoustic (11 stations), infrasound (80 stations) and radionuclide (80 stations) monitoring. 60 particulate monitoring stations are currently delivering data to the International Data Centre of the Preparatory Commission for the CTBTO in Vienna.”

Source: http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/12/2313/2012/acp-12-2313-2012.pdf

MORE: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2014/01/11/tepco-cooked-core-of-reactor-2-core-and-then-blew-it-out/

Containment reactors COOK Fuel and blew it out! A meltdown scenario is unlikely! It is a fairy tale told by the industry to let containment type reactors run all over the planet. But in case of emergency the let their inventory fly – controlled of course – making each country an invisible radioactive wasteland. Programming the cellular apocalypse for generations. Measurements that prove that FUEL was blown out:

We can read about the 400 mSv per hour measuerd near the plant (“There was a media report of a 40-rem dose measured somewhere near the plant.”) quote from NRC on PAGE 15: http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1205/ML12052A106.pdf

TEPCO01

According to KAWATA Toumio, Fellow of the Nuclear Waste Management Organization of Japan (NUMO), all reactor inventory of Fukushima Reactor 2 was released on March 14th 2011, 6:22 pm: http://www.strahlentelex.de/Stx_11_588_S01-02.pdf

From TEPCO’s emergency correspondence to JAPANESE GOVERNMENT, starting March 11th 2011. Official Data: Up to 110 milli Sievert PER HOUR in air distance 0,28 km to Fukushima Plant, Wind South-East & 64 milli Sievert PER HOUR distance 4,29 km to Fukushima Plant, Wind South-East. ALL DATA: http://fukushima-diary.com/2012/04/emergency-correspondence-between-jp-gov-and-tepco-right-after-311/
thanks Mochizuki!

TEPCO03


110 milli Sievert PER HOUR! Even at a distance of 280 Meters on the Sea!

That’s why “25 Sv/h from the damaged stack for reactor1 and 2 / Highest reading outside of the buildings” was measured: http://fukushima-diary.com/2013/12/tepco-attached-a-dosimeter-on-the-top-of-a-pole-moved-it-by-a-minitruck-to-measure-25-svh/ quote by Fukushima-Diary.com

1.6 Sv/h on the first floor of reactor1 / Highly radioactive source is in the vent pipe (update): http://fukushima-diary.com/2014/01/1-6-svh-on-the-first-floor-of-reactor1-highly-radioactive-source-is-in-the-vent-pipe/

A dry reactor heats up 100°C every 0,1 seconds and becomes so supercritical, that it even overtakes the Doppler Effect: http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/Artikel%20zu%20Tschernobyl%20in%20Nuclear%20Technology%20Vol%20

Make sure your reactor has a containment and exhaust valves.
If you notice that the water level drops, then open the valves to relieve pressure. The fuel enters into a phase transition and is drained piece by piece until the entire inventory is gone.
Tell the world public then, the core “had melted” (Then everyone believes the core is still there). Not a single photo of any molten material since 2011! But the world is told the Meltdown Fairy Tale.
Important: HIDE measuring results from the vicinity of the reactor.
BECAUSE: High values indicate where the fuel was blown off and where it was distributed to. Evauation is needed, stop all Reactors. They can not afford this truth!

TEPCO cooked Reactor 2 Core and blown it out completely, to avoid a nuclear explosion of the reactor type, because of the pressure in the containment, that increased. Reactor Fuel can develop a yield of more than 1 Terrajoule, which is 0,2 – 0,3 KT TNT. No containment can survive this. AND: TO avoid that the world could learn: A nuclear explosion is possible in each reactor. THE END OF NUCLER FISSION ENERGY.

A containment means: Cooking Fuel and letting it out as pressure!

All contaiment reactors must be slowed down and shut down immediately.

This is the thing we have overseen all the time!

We always blamed Chernobyl: No containment. But conainment means: PRESSURE!

On 14 March 2011 at 6:22 pm clock local time there were HUGE emissions of the entire radioactive inventory of the reactor 2 with a subsequent sharp increase in the dose rate to several millisieverts per hour (mSv / h), into various areas. On the following two days there were then more fires and explosions, which were also coming from the reactor 4 which then caused Tepco to measure a local dose of 400 mSv / h. These findings were presented to Toumio Kawata, a fellow of the Nuclear Waste Management Organization of Japan, at the 16th Meeting of the Japanese nuclear Commission on 24 May 2011. “Strahlentelex” has his manuscript been made available: http://www.strahlentelex.de/Stx_11_586_S05-06.pdf

 

worldwide-man

 

 

 

 

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

 

nuclear-history

In 1963 the radioactivity in milk was so high, the public got alarmed. But the USAEC (today NRC) denied everything. Former President Kennedy held his speech and demanded the bomb test stop: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:President_Kennedy_signs_Nuclear_Test_Ban_Treaty,_07_October_1963.jpgIronically, the health authorities (former NRC: USAEC – president: Seaborg – who discovered Plutonium:) were particularly zealous advocates of nuclear bombs Supporters. Three months later, President Kennedy was shot.

President Kennedy, June, 1963: “the number of children and grandchildren with cancer in their bones, with leukemia in their blood, or with poison in their lungs might seem statistically small to some, in comparison with natural health hazards, but this is not a natural health hazard–and it is not a statistical issue. The loss of even one human life, or the malformation of even one baby–who may be born long after we are gone–should be of concern to us all. Our children and grandchildren are not merely statistics toward which we can be indifferent.” http://www.ratical.org/radiation/inetSeries/RB89.html

2nd-paradise

Where to go, Adam and Eve?

 

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

IAEA-CTBTO

Written by CTBTO one day ago, in a short teply to me:

!!!!

“The Japanese think tank CPDNP regularely publishes data from the Takasaki station http://www.cpdnp.jp/pdf/130110Takasaki_report_Dec31.pdf (LINK)

!!!!

Why is this important?

Answer: The World Health Organisation WHO has to date the results of measurement to Fukushima under wraps, the WHO and the IAEA regularly receives from the international authority to monitor agreements on nuclear weapons test ban (CTBTO). The world’s 60 monitoring stations of the CTBTO to register around the clock, the radioactivity in the atmosphere. General Secretary Chan of the WHO said the WHO would publish CTBTO measurement data  “only if it’s dangerous values.” If that was the case, they decide “alone”. At the same time, there is NO safe level of radiation. K.Z. Morgan (former ICRP chairman) “there is no dose of radiatoon so low that the risk of malignancy is zero” QUOTE page 30, right, although the ICRP claimed the opposite until 1960. http://books.google.de/books?id=aAoAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA30#v=onepage&q&f=false

LOW DOSES ARE THE MAIN KILL! How the Nuclear Industry first kills the Children and then the Parents

click: Low Radiation: The Petkau Effect

click: Radiation: Larger effect of small doses!

Of only ONE Station: CTBTO station Takasaki is 200 km from Fukushima.

Why is this outstanding? ANSWER: IAEA conceales CTBTO Fukushima Data (LINK)

“Two stations of the CTBTO network, Okinawa and Takasaki, are located in Japan, but 133Xe (XENON) measurements are made only at Takasaki. However, the Takasaki noble gas detections were, for an extended period of time, reaching the dynamic range of the system, meaning that measurements were so high that they became unreliable. Regarding the 137Cs (CESIUM) measurements at Takasaki, there was another problem: During the first passage of the plume at this station, radioactivity entered the interior of the building. This resulted in a serious contamination, meaning that 137Cs shows up continuously in the measurements since the initial event, even when it is completely absent in the ambient air.” http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/12/2313/2012/acp-12-2313-2012.pdf

THIS IS THE NETWORK: http://www.ctbto.org/map/#ims

USUALLY IAEA AND WHO CONCEAL ALL CTBTO DATA!

Kennedy stopped the bomb tests because of Strontium in milk. Shortly after he was shot!

請願 http://www.cpdnp.jp/pdf/120521Takasaki_report_May11.pdf

German http://www.bfs.de/de/ion/imis/spurenmessungen.html

Philippine http://www.pnri.dost.gov.ph/index.php

Austrian http://www.zamg.ac.at/wetter/fukushima/

I hereby demand that the results of the analyses conducted to measure the airborne radioactivity by the global network (TICEN) be made public, ENTIRELY AND WITHOUT ANY FURTHER DELAY:

english: http://petitions.criirad.org/?For-a-total-transparency-on-the

請願: http://petitions.criirad.org/?%E8%AB%8B%E9%A1%98%E6%9B%B8,34

française http://petitions.criirad.org/?-Petitions-

thanks CRIIRAD!

Millions Fewer Girls Born: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2011/06/110602-millions-fewer-girls-nuclear-radiation-births-science/

Jan Hemmer

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

IAEA-CTBTO

CTBTO is world’s most advanced radiation measurement network, a direct result of President Kennedy’s a bomb test stop agenda: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AiuPubfL1AY

The Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) foresees a global ban of all nuclear explosions. To verify compliance with the CTBT, a global International Monitoring System (IMS) with four different measurement technologies is currently built up, namely for seismic (170 stations), hydroacoustic (11 stations), infrasound (80 stations) and radionuclide (80 stations) monitoring.

Radionuclide station network: 80 particulate radionclide stations with daily samples and detection sensitivity of 10 – 30 micro becquerel per m³

President Kennedy, June, 1963: “the number of children and grandchildren with cancer in their bones, with leukemia in their blood, or with poison in their lungs might seem statistically small to some, in comparison with natural health hazards, but this is not a natural health hazard–and it is not a statistical issue. The loss of even one human life, or the malformation of even one baby–who may be born long after we are gone–should be of concern to us all. Our children and grandchildren are not merely statistics toward which we can be indifferent.” http://www.ratical.org/radiation/inetSeries/RB89.html

Nobel peace laureate Linus Pauling proved, that by fallout of the atomic and h bomb tests of 1958 15.000 children with severe hereditary error came to the world in one year. 38,000 children were born dead. 90,000 were murdered inside of the mother.  http://books.google.de/books?id=2QduA19d_X8C&pg=PA1310&dq=Linus+Pauling:+Biomolecular+sciences+90,000&hl=de&ei=tXlGTuMWg8PxA4rQscoG&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CDEQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false In 1963 the radioactivity in milk was so high, the public got alarmed. But the USAEC denied everything. Former President Kennedy held his speech and demanded the bomb test stop. Ironically, the health authorities were particularly zealous advocates of nuclear bombs Supporters.

“Possible scale of lost or impaired children after Chernobyl in all of Europe and the part of Asia coveredMissing Children: 2,5 Million.” PAGE 34 http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/RIGEinEuroandCNPPc.pdf

60 particulate monitoring stations are currently delivering data to the International Data Centre of the Preparatory Commission for the CTBTO in Vienna.

Where also the IAEA sits: http://blogs.nature.com/news/2011/03/exclusive_governments_withhold.html

http://www.ctbto.org/verification-regime/the-11-march-japan-disaster/

請願 http://www.cpdnp.jp/pdf/120521Takasaki_report_May11.pdf

German http://www.bfs.de/de/ion/imis/spurenmessungen.html

Philippine http://www.pnri.dost.gov.ph/index.php

Austrian http://www.zamg.ac.at/wetter/fukushima/

From Source: http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/11/28319/2011/acpd-11-28319-2011.pdf:

“Two stations of the CTBTO network, Okinawa and Takasaki, are located in Japan, but 133Xe (XENON) measurements are made only at Takasaki. However, the Takasaki noble gas detections were, for an extended period of time, reaching the dynamic range of the system, meaning that measurements were so high that they became unreliable. Regarding the 137Cs (CESIUM) measurements at Takasaki, there was another problem: During the first passage of the plume at this station, radioactivity entered the interior of the building. This resulted in a serious contamination, meaning that 137Cs shows up continuously in the measurements since the initial event, even when it is completely absent in the ambient air.”

THIS IS THE NETWORK: http://www.ctbto.org/map/#ims

and the only info we get: http://www.ctbto.org/press-centre/highlights/2011/fukushima-related-measurements-by-the-ctbto/fukushima-related-measurements-by-the-ctbto-page-2/

nuclear-shills

Air Research Institute NILU from Norway “We used both atmospheric activity concentration measurements as well as, for 137Cs, measurements of bulk deposition. Regarding 133Xe, we find a total release of 15.3 (uncertainty range 12.2–18.3) EBq, which is more than twice as high as the total release from Chernobyl and likely the largest radioactive noble gas release in history.” PDF: http://zardoz.nilu.no/~andreas/publications/219.pdf

Atmospheric Transport: http://www.eurad.uni-koeln.de/index_e.html

IAEA even houses CTBTO: http://www.ctbto.org/press-centre/press-releases/2011/ctbto-to-share-data-with-iaea-and-who/

CTBTO Data was sent to IAEA in the first hour while Fukushima began to explode. It is permanentely available to IAEA. IAEA Database has more than 1 million data measurements from all kinds of source.

This said Denis Flory of IAEA in March 2012. http://www.ctbto.org/press-centre/highlights/2012/one-year-after-fukushimathe-ctbtos-contributions/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhSGGHABwl4

ALL DATA IS CONCEALED: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/05/27/margaret-chan-versus-world-health-organisation/

Congratulations CTBTO! 15 years of Cover up by IAEA and W.H.O.

https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/02/18/congratulations-ctbto-15-years-of-cover-up-by-iaea-and-w-h-o/

The World Health Organisation WHO has to date the results of measurement to Fukushima under wraps, the WHO and the IAEA regularly receives from the international authority to monitor agreements on nuclear weapons test ban (CTBTO). The world’s 60 monitoring stations of the CTBTO to register around the clock, the radioactivity in the atmosphere.

The “Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics (ZAMG) in Vienna, which also has access to the measurement results of the CTBT0, presented at the end of fixed March with a significantly higher leakage of radioactivity from Fukushima, when the Japanese authorities – based on their data, the WHO and the IAEA – publicly announced. General Secretary Chan of the WHO said the WHO would publish CTBTO measurement data  “only if it’s dangerous values.” If that was the case, they decide “alone”.

At the same time admitted the Director-General, that the WHO is “no expert on radiation,” and that the WHO “on this issue today almost at all has not within the jurisdiction more.” The Department of Radiobiology at the Geneva WHO headquarters was closed two years ago under pressure from private and public donors. Earlier, the deputy head of the department with the attempt to impose lower limits for WHO Iodine intake failed on objections by the IAEA and France: http://www.chernobylcongress.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/Baverstock_How_the_UN_works.pdf

I hereby demand that the results of the analyses conducted to measure the airborne radioactivity by the global network (TICEN) be made public, ENTIRELY AND WITHOUT ANY FURTHER DELAY:

english: http://petitions.criirad.org/?For-a-total-transparency-on-the

請願: http://petitions.criirad.org/?%E8%AB%8B%E9%A1%98%E6%9B%B8,34

française http://petitions.criirad.org/?-Petitions-

now, continuing with quotes from http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/11/28319/2011/acpd-11-28319-2011.pdf :

The CTBTO stations are all equipped with high-volume aerosol samplers. (…) As part of CTBT treaty monitoring, half of the radionuclide stations shall additionally be equipped with xenon detectors. FLEXPART is also the model operationally used at CTBTO for atmospheric backtracking and at the Austrian Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics for emergency response as well as CTBT verification purposes.

The UN General Assembly adopted the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court on July 17, 1998. On July 1, 2002 the statute came into force. “The International Criminal Court is a permanent tribunal to prosecute individuals for genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes.” (Wikipedia, 03/25/2011)

Thus far, the ICC has not accepted criminal or civil cases involving the destruction of natural resources and environmental terrorism. The establishment of its authority to do so is long overdue.

In relation to the ongoing accident at Fukushima, responsible officials from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the World Health Organization (WHO), the operating company (TEPCO) and Japanese nuclear power regulators should be brought before the International Criminal Court and held accountable for their actions.

Failure to aid in tens of thousands of cases and threats to natural resources hundreds of thousands if not millions of people is a Felony.

The behavior of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the World Health Organization (WHO) following the reactor accident of Fukushima is a scandal. WHO has made public statements trivializing the emergency and ceding all of its responsibilities to the IAEA, citing the treaty of 1957. “What is WHO’s role in nuclear emergencies? Answer by WHO: “Within the United Nations system, the IAEA is the lead agency for coordination of international response to radiation events.” (World Health Organization, Japan Nuclear Concerns, FAQ, 14 March 2011, Geneva)

The IAEA – an organization whose Board of Governors is dominated by and comprised almost entirely of nuclear industry members, holds fast to its opinion that Fukushima should be assessed at Level 5 on the International Rating scale for significant events in nuclear facilities (INES).

The quantity of radioactive Iodine-131 released is a central indicator for the evaluation of nuclear accidents on the INES scale. The release of more than “a few 10 ^ 16 Bq of iodine 131” is classified as a level 7 catastrophic accident this (INES) scale.

Apparently, the IAEA, TEPCO and the Japanese government officials in charge have not clearly stated how much radioactive material has been released throughout the unfolding of the Fukushima disaster. According to estimates by the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO), comprised of 60 monitoring stations world-wide under the auspices of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, the first three days of the Fukushima accident alone released about 3.8 x 10 ^ 17 Bq of radioactive Iodine-131. That is about 100 times the official inventory. The Fukushima disaster has also released significant amounts of several other radionuclides which have not even been measured.

Due to these figures, the Fukushima accident would have been legitimately classified as INES level 7 a long time ago. Greenpeace is now in the process of conducting its own analysis.

The behavior of WHO and the IAEA is therefore an unprecedented scandal. An inappropriately small evacuation zone is estimated to have resulted in the needless exposure of pregnant women, children, and other adults to excessive levels of radiation and radioactive contamination beyond 250mSv, the limit set for the recognition of work related cancer among Japanese nuclear power plant employees. Radiation biology assumes that if 10,000 people were exposed to a dose of 1 Sv, then 500 deaths are expected to occur as a result of their exposure (ICRP60) 500-1200 (BEIRV) 580-1740 (RERF), 2400 (Köhler). The ICRP – another profiteer of the atomic industry – made the recommendations for radiation protection standards, which were accepted by all countries and which were used o justify IAEA regulations.

Calculations based on models used by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) show that dietary intake of the maximum amount of radioactive contamination permitted in the EU and Japan would lead to at least roughly 150,000 fatalities in Germany each year. Other calculation models reach vastly higher figures. If the entire German population were to eat foods exposing individuals to only 5 percent of the contamination currently allowed in food imports from Japan, at least 7,700 fatalities could be expected; this figure doesn’t even include the secondary consequences of a wide range of greatly varying diseases and genetic disorders.

http://foodwatch.de/foodwatch/content/e10/e42688/e44884/e44993/CalculatedFatalitiesfromRadiation_Reportfoodwatch-IPPNW2011-09-20_ger.pdf

and: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/09/25/european-union-kills-legallly-150000-people-each-year-with-irradiated-food-in-germany/

TEPCO invents fictitious measurements – CTBTO Data covered up

https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/02/17/tepco-invents-fictitious-measurements-ctbto-data-covered-up/

Two stations of the CTBTO network, Okinawa and Takasaki, are located in Japan, but 133Xe (XENON) measurements are made only at Takasaki. However, the Takasaki noble gas detections were, for an extended period of time, reaching the dynamic range of the system, meaning that measurements were so high that they became unreliable.

VIDEOS about CTBTO / WHO / UNSCEAR -> One Club.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6t9Vn7-9eU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8ktRCI4zN4 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jDpj5Eaa8A

MORE MEDIA COVERAGE: http://www.ctbto.org/fileadmin/user_upload/public_information/2011/Updated_list_CTBTO_Fukushima_media_coverage_March-June.pdf

On PDF Page 59 of TEPCO document 1-8 we find: 4 x 10 mSv (per hour? I think so) at a distance of 0,28 km: http://www.scribd.com/doc/88568685/%E7%A6%8F%E5%B3%B6%E7%AC%AC%E4%B8%80%E5%8E%9F%E7%99%BA%E4%BA%8B%E6%95%85%E7%9B%B4%E5%BE%8C%E3%81%8B%E3%82%89%E3%81%AE%E7%8F%BE%E5%A0%B4%E3%81%A8%E6%94%BF%E5%BA%9C%E3%81%AE%E3%82%84%E3%82%8A%E5%8F%96%E3%82%8AFAX1-8 – which is exactly the the 40 mSv/h mentioned in this NRC correspondence on PDF page 15 (“There was a media report of a 40-rem dose measured somewhere near the plant.”): http://www.houseoffoust.com/fukushima/NRCFOIA/ML12052A106.pdf in my view, this speaks for brutal high radiation, if we take into account, that the air even weakens the concentration. This is 4 times the daily dose at a 1000 Curie per km² area, for example near Chernobyl reactor 4 / hot sport, with 37 mio becquerel per m² (map): http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/Chernobyl-map.jpg and I _think_ this speaks for the lost inventory of containment and inventory. Because it is also reactor fuel, that is all over there (494 Kg of Plutonium 239 was in the burnup fuel): Page 6 right top: http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/Artikel%20zu%20Tschernobyl%20in%20Nuclear%20Technology%20Vol%2090.pdf
According to KAWATA Toumio, Fellow of the Nuclear Waste Management Organization of Japan (NUMO), all reactor inventory of Fukushima Reactor 2 was released on March 14th 2011, 6:22 pm: http://www.strahlentelex.de/Stx_11_588_S01-02.pdf

For a transparent Future!

Jan Hemmer

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

it is recognized by the World Health Organization that the International Atomic Energy Agency has the primary responsibility for encouraging, assisting and coordinating research and development and practical application of atomic energy for peaceful uses throughout the world without prejudice to the right of the World Health Organization to concern itself with promoting, developing, assisting and coordinating international health work, including research, in all its aspects.http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/Others/inf20.shtml#note_c

VERSUS:

Radiation Is Always Dangerous, Says World Health Organization Director-General:  http://concernforhealth.org/radiation-is-always-dangerous-says-world-health-organization-director-general/

BECAUSE of the IAEA-WHO CONTRACT, HERE ARE WHO’s CANCER CRITERIA:

The main way in which the “radiation protection industry” has succeeded in hugely underrating the ill-health caused by nuclear power is by insisting on a group of extremely restrictive definitions as to what qualifies as a radiation-caused illness statistic. For example, under IAEA’s criteria:

>    If a radiation-caused cancer is not fatal, it is not counted in the IAEA’s figures

>    If a cancer is initiated by another carcenogen, but accelerated or promoted by exposure to radiation, it is not counted.

>    If an auto-immune disease or any non-cancer is caused by radiation, it is not counted.

>    Radiation-damaged embryos or foetuses which result in miscarriage or stillbirth do not count

>    A congenitally blind, deaf or malformed child whose illnesses are are radiation-related are not included in the figures because this is not genetic damage, but rather is teratogenic, and will not be passed on later to the child’s offspring.

>    Causing the genetic predisposition to breast cancer or heart disease does not count since it is not a “serious genetic disease” in the Mendelian sense.

>    Even if radiation causes a fatal cancer or serious genetic disease in a live born infant, it is discounted if the estimated radiation dose is below 100 mSv [mSv= millisievert, a measurement of radiation exposure. One hundred millsievert is the equivalent in radiation of about 100 X-Rays].

>    Even if radiation causes a lung cancer, it does not count if the person smokes — in fact whenever there is a possibility of another cause, radiation cannot be blamed.

>    If all else fails, it is possible to claim that radiation below some designated dose does not cause cancer, and then average over the whole body the radiation dose which has actually been received by one part of the body or even organ, as for instance when radio-iodine concentrates in the thyroid. This arbitrary dilution of the dose will ensure that the 100 mSv cut-off point is nowhere near reached. It is a technique used to dismiss the sickness of Gulf War veterans who inhaled small particles of ceramic uranium which stayed in their lungs for more than two years, and in their bodies for more than eight years, irradiating and damaging cells in a particular part of the body.

quote by Dr. Rosalia Bertell, November 1999 issue of The Ecologist, pp. 408-411: http://ratical.org/radiation/NAvictims.html

At the Chernobyl IAEA forum the term “Radiophobia” was invented and used: “What’s worse, the IAEA is going public these days with statements ridiculing the so called “radiophobia” of the population and calling for an end of aid programs, which, according to the IAEA report of 2005, only serve to instil a victim mentality in a totally healthy population – a claim not only cynical, but potentially dangerous for the health of the affected population.” Source: http://www.ippnw-students.org/chernobyl/coverup.html

“Presently the international organizations (WHO, IAEA) recognize as the main cause of increase of thyroid cancer in liquidators and children population after the accident their irradiation with radioactive iodine, I-131. The rest of diseases, they suppose, are provoked by psycho-emotional reactions..” (!!!…RADIOPHOBIA…!!!) There is no linear dose effect correlation, but “The bimodal dependence of effects on dose was revealed for all studied parameters. Namely, effects increased at low doses, reached maximum (for low doses), then decreased (in some cases the effect sign reversed) and thereafter increased with the increase of dosage”: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Burlakova.pdf IGNORED BY IAEA, UNSCEAR, ICRP, WHO

The IAEA advises atomic states, is the PR agency for the atomic miliatry and industry, reports to the security council and has the five VETO powers of the U.N. as members. They want to blame the radiation victims, because of their fear of radiation – called RADIOPHOBIA by the IAEA: Japan officials are going to call radiation measurements illegal and that they are disturbing the industry. Health plays no role. They are adapting the IAEA ideology of Radiophobia: The fear of radiation is worse than the radiation. And the declining birth rates among belarusians under the age of 30 – declared by the IAEA with “Radiophobia”: http://www.iaea.org/inis/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/28/073/28073803.pdf – quote “2. PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACTS OF NUCLEAR ACCIDENTS : Soon after the discovery of ionizing radiation, it was realized that radiation could harmfully affect skin tissues, body organs and the human body as a whole beside the genetic effects. Lately after the drop of the first atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki and also after Three-Miles-Island and Chernobyl accidents anew phenomenon described as RADIOPHOBIA have become apparent and widely spread..” PAGE 338.

“INTERNAL radionuclides are 10 to 100 times more damaging than the equivalent EXTERNALdose” Dr. Michel Fernex, former WHO employee

Appeal to the World Health Organisation – IPPNW Germany appeals to the World Health Organisation to substantially expand medical research on the health effects of the Fukushima nuclear disaster: http://www.fukushima-disaster.de/information-in-english/maximum-credible-accident.html

japanese: http://www.fukushima-disaster.de/information-in-japanese.html

FROM W.H.O.: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2012/wha65_closes_20120526/en/index.html “Dr Margaret Chan appointed to a second term as Director-General of the World Health Organization by the 65th World Health Assembly”

1959年のWHO-IAEA協定文書の翻訳 http://www.crms-jpn.com/art/112.html

Gregory Härtl – Team Leader, Communications for Global Alert and Response (GAR) World Health Organization: “Within the United Nations system, the IAEA is the lead agency for coordination of international response to radiation events.” 14 March 2011

Why our Children are killed and ignored: http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/Others/inf20.shtml#note_c

“World Health Organisation experts played a role of advocates of the Soviet authorities which tried to play down by any means the scale of the Chernobyl accident and its radiological consequences”: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/1998/kr-21/Malko96-1.html

the WHO released the paper “Preliminary Dose Estimation from the nuclear accident after the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami”

here >>> http://www.who.int/ionizing_radiation/pub_meet/fukushima_dose_assessment/en/index.html

consumption >>> “It can be concluded that the estimated effective doses outside Japan from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident are below (and often far below) the dose levels regarded by the international radiological protection community as very small.”

The paper is not interested in INTERNAL EMITTERS and NOT in GENOMIC INSTABILITY and NOT in LATENCY. The paper / WHO makes ICRP the law maker, instead of WHO, who is / should be the authority on human health on earth: 

“UNSCEAR, in 1955 and IAEA, in 1957, were set up by the United Nations (UN) in response to the U.S. President Eisenhower’s Peaceful Energy talk at the UN, in 1953. The IAEA was mandated to perform two tasks — to assist countries in harnessing nuclear energy for peaceful purposes and to carry out inspections to ensure that any assistance a country received from another was used exclusively for peaceful purposes and not diverted to developing any nuclear weapon. UNSCEAR was to report on the adequacy of the regulation of ionizing radiation and its effects on health. IAEA subsequently took its radiation protection recommendations directly from ICRP (rather than WHO), therefore persons from the Commission who also sit on UNSCEAR both make the rules and judge their adequacy.”

“Dr. Mettler, Jr., leading the Health Investigation after Chernobyl for IAEA in 1991, was subsequently appointed to the main Commission of ICRP, and also to the health effects evaluation committee of UNSCEAR. This is a major conflict of interest because of the agency mandates.”

From: http://ratical.org/radiation/Chernobyl/CaUFtH.html

“Executive conclusion of the Recommendation of the European Committee for radiation risks declares: “…Total maximal permitted dose from all human-caused sources should not exceed 0.1 mSv for population and 5 mSv for personnel”. This publication is declared by the European Committee for radiation risks as “regulating”. It is only common sense that we should follow the recommendations given in this publication by the scientists from Canada, Norway, Great Britain, Denmark, Switzerland, the USA, Ireland, Sweden, Germany, France, India, Belarus, Finland and Russia.” page 16 http://independentwho.org/media/Documents_IW/Forum_Radioprotection_English_Abstracts_IW_2012.pdf

2013: Cancer risk 70% higher for females in Fukushima area, says WHO: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/feb/28/cancer-risk-fukushima-who

SHAME OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION!
Complicity! Crimes against humanity!
>>> Critical Analysis of the WHO’s health risk assessment of the
Fukushima nuclear catastrophe <<<
– The report is based on faulty assumptions!
– The report ignores the health risks for people outside of Fukushima!
– Continued radioactive emissions were not included in the assessment!
– The report ignores the increased radiosensitivity of the unborn child!
– Recent clinical findings were not taken into considerations!
– Non-cancer diseases are not included in the health risk calculations!
– The authors’ neutrality has to be doubted!
http://www.ippnw.de/commonFiles/pdfs/Atomenergie/Fukushima/WHO_Fukushima_Report2013_Criticism_en.pdf

WHOのフクシマ原発事故健康リスク評価に対する批判的分析!!!
報告書は間違った推定を基盤にしている
今回の報告書はWHOが2012年5月に公表した予備的線量推定iiをベースにしているが、この
推定は以下のいくつかの理由から独立系の研究者から激しく批判されたiii。
• 放射性物質の総放出量(ソースターム)を過小評価した
• 避難前、避難中における20キロメートル内地域に居住していた公衆の被曝を無視した
• 内部被曝線量の計算に使用された食品試料の量が不十分で、試料の選択が偏っていた
• 報告書の作成責任のある原子力科学者に不透明な利害関係があった
http://www.ippnw.de/commonFiles/pdfs/Atomenergie/Fukushima/WHO_Fukushima_Report2013_Criticism_jp.pdf

THE AGREEMENT WHA 12 – 40 between IAEA and WHO: http://independentwho.org/en/who-and-aiea-aggreement/ QUOTE:

“Since the signing of this agreement, WHO has shown no autonomy of action towards achieving its stated objectives in the field of radiation protection.

On the contrary it has shown its capacity for misinforming the public about the health consequences of radioactive contamination caused by the civil and military nuclear industries.

WHO waited five years before visiting those territories that had been heavily contaminated by the accident at Chernobyl. They gave no instructions for evacuation or for the provision of clean food to the affected populations.

WHO has kept hidden the health consequences of this catastrophe, especially by not publishing the proceedings of the 1995 and 2001 conferences.

WHO still estimates the number of deaths caused by Chernobyl at less than fifty and attributes the health problems of populations of Belarus, Ukraine and Russia to fear of radiation.

WHO does not recognise the validity of the work published in 2009 by the Academy of Sciences of New York which estimates the number of deaths caused by Chernobyl to be nearly one million.

With Fukushima, WHO has the same attitude as for Chernobyl.

The World Health Organisation (WHO) does not respect its constitution which lays down the following principle:

“Informed opinion and active cooperation from the public are of paramount importance for improving the health of people …”

In the first chapter, Article 1:

“The goal of the World Health Organization shall be the attainment by all peoples of the highest possible level of health.”

In chapter 2 – FUNCTIONS of WHO:

a) to act as the directing and co-ordinating Authority on International Health Work.”

“The WHO experts had also rejected any relation between radiation and the significant increase in the morbidity in many somatic diseases established in the affected areas of Belarus, Russia and the Ukraine soon after the accident. / the international radiation community practically played a role of an advocate of the USSR government that tried to play down the consequences of this accident from the very beginning.” http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/1998/kr-21/Malko96-1.html

On May 4th 2011, the Secretary General of the WHO (Margeret Chan) admitted: “Radiation always dangerous”:

worlwide unique article of german newspaper TAZ, meeting with Margeret Chan >>> http://www.taz.de/!70237/

my translation >>>https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/05/12/w-h-o-secretary-general-chan-admits-for-the-first-time-in-52-years-radiation-is-always-dangerous/ QUOTE:

“Radiation always dangerous”

WHO Rollercoaster on Nuclear Radiation

Margaret Chan, Director-General of the World Health Organisation (WHO) distances herself from WHO’s previous position on evaluating nuclear risks. An increase in permissible levels for radiation exposure in Japan triggered this change.

“There is no such thing as a safe dose for low-level radiation” explained Margaret Chan, Director-General of the World Health Organisation, to members of the critical group “Independent WHO” in a spontaneous meeting with them. Up until now WHO has consistently stuck to the position agreed with the Internation Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) which claims that ionising radiation is safe below a certain dose.

This about-face occurs just before the World Health Assembly is due to take place from May 16 to 24 where cooperation with IAEA is on the agenda. Chan was referring to incorporated radiactive particles like iodine 131, caesium 137, strontium 90 and other substances that are taken into the body through food, drink or breathing air with this statement.

These particles settle in the thyroid gland, bones and inner organs where they continue to radiate. Numerous studies by independent scientists have shown that such particles from the Chernobyl nuclear catastrophe in April 1986 are responsible for up to 95 % of all radiationinduced cancers and genetic mutation.

Up until now WHO has denied the existence of internal radiation. In all of its statements on potential health risks, only external ionising radiation were referred to, based on the first, and to date, only data taken in Hiroshima and Nagasaki after the nuclear bombings in 1945.

Fukushima data still under lock and key

Chan distanced herself also from previous WHO statements on the effects of Chernobyl. “I personally do not believe that the Chernobyl nuclear accident only caused 50 deaths” stated the WHO Director-General, according to notes taken at the meeting with the critic’s group. As agreed with IAEA, WHO has claimed officially that only 52 irradiated people died as a direct result of the Chernobyl catastrophe and up to 6000 more developed thyroid cancer.

These are the same figures that the UN Scientific Commission on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) quoted in their publication of February of this year. However, despite correcting previous positions, when referring to Fukushima Chan continues to insist that she has “fully exercised her responsibility … without being compromised by the 1959 agreement with IAEA in any way”. Chan defended the much-criticised fact that WHO has up until now held the measurement data on Fukushima under lock and key that it, and IAEA, regularly receives from CTBTO, an organisation set up to monitor the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty.

IAEA even houses CTBTO: http://www.ctbto.org/press-centre/press-releases/2011/ctbto-to-share-data-with-iaea-and-who/

Only one radiation expert left at WHO

CTBTO has 80 monitoring stations around the globe that constantly take measurements of ionising radiation in the atmosphere. The Central Office for Meteorology and Geodynamic (ZAMG) in Vienna also has access to CTBTO data and thereby established already by the end of March that radioactive emissions from Fukushima were much higher than those given by the Japanese authorities. Even so, WHO and IAEA have continued to publicly quote the Japanese figures. Chan stated that WHO would only publish the CTBTO data “if they were to indicate dangerous levels”.

CTBTO: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/02/17/tepco-invents-fictitious-measurements-ctbto-data-covered-up/ and: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/02/18/congratulations-ctbto-15-years-of-cover-up-by-iaea-and-w-h-o/

CTBTO DATA: http://www.bfs.de/en/ion/imis/animation.gif

This would be “her decision only”. At the same time, the Director-General added that she was “not an expert on nuclear radiation” and that “WHO has practically no more competence in this field”. The department on radiobiology at the WHO headquarters in Geneva was closed down two years ago under pressure from private and state funders. The deputy head of the department had previously attempted to get the WHO limits for iodine exposure lowered, without success, due to resistance from IAEA and France.

Today there is only one single radiobiologist at the WHO headquarters.

WHO cannot publish its findings

 Chan told the NGO “Independent WHO” that she would try to “find out what happened to the documents from the 2001 joint conference with IAEA on Chernobyl held in Kiev”. Until now WHO has claimed that these documents have already been published in their entirety.

In actual fact only a short summary of the proceedings was published. Out of 700 documents of the first WHO/IAEAjoint conference on Chernobyl in 1995, only 12 have been published. According to a TV interview with Hiroshi Nakashima, who was WHO Director-General at that time, this was due to IAEA intervention unter the terms of the agreement with WHO.

Toshisho Kosak, official nuclear adviser to the Japanese government , resigned from his post at the end of April and, in front of TV cameras, tearfully lamented the government decision on radiation limits. He criticised both the increase in exposure limits permitted for nuclear workers in Fukushima and the new annual limit of 20 milliSievert for schoolchildren in the vicinity of the nuclear power plant.

He complained that it was unacceptable, saying “as a scientist, I cannot condone this”. Professor Kosak had only just been given the position this March by Prime Minister Naoto Kan.

At the end of the day, concrete measures for action to protect the population remain in the hands of national governments. Nevertheless, WHO — founded in 1948 with 192 member states – is responsible for informing and educating people on public health issues. Observers are of the opinion that a withdrawal from the agreement with IAEA could therefore play a role in the coming World Health Assembly from May 16 to 24.

Author: Andreas Zumach

Translation: Xanthe Hall

Earlier, the deputy head of the department with the attempt to impose lower limits for WHO Iodine intake failed on objections by the IAEA and France: http://www.chernobylcongress.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/Baverstock_How_the_UN_works.pdf

WHO and IAEA cover up worldwide CTBTO data. They decide if radiation doses are dangerous or not. This contradicts Margaret Chan’s statement, that Radiation is ALWAYS dangerous”

The silent and forgotten scandal: http://chernobyl.undp.org/spanish/otherdoc/fund.htm No Money No Study No Victims (even this link is pure Cover Up “no increase in leukaemia”)

“The WHO Pilot Project «Brain Damage in Utero» International Advisory Board assumes that prenatal exposure to the Chernobyl disaster can give rise to a dysfunctional child, either because of organic damage to the developing brain or because of the disturbed psychosocial milieu.” http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr79/kr79pdf/Nyagu.pdf

Chernobyl: the great cover-up http://mondediplo.com/2008/04/14who

F-68480 BIEDERTHAL, Wednesday, November 30, 2011

Michel Fernex

When reading the article of the Mainich Daily News, dealing with health problems after the nuclear accident of Fukushima, One may ask the question: which institution could advice the authorities for ta-king the best decisions to protect the population and reduce the suffering of the victims?

The responsibility of the direction of the factory starts with the errors in the planning and building of the power plant, the absence of information about the real damage which started with the earthquake, more than one hour before the rest of the wave of the tsunami making thousands of victims 100km from there. * The later errors lead to the delay to reduce and stop the contamination of the air, of the soils and water.

According to its constitution (1946) the World Health Organization (WHO) has to provide an adequate technical assistance in the field of medicine. Intervention in case of urgency, if required by governments, or just after acceptation of such interventions should furnish the best information, give pieces of advice and assistance concerning health. It has to form a well documented public opinion regarding health. None of these obligations were respected.

For historical reasons this did not happen. The WHO signed in 1959 with the newly created (1957) International Agency for Atomic Energy (IAEA) an Agreement (WHA 12.40) which ended the independence of the WHO to act in the field of nuclear industry. * More recent decisions confirm the take away of the activities of the WHO in the field of ionizing radiation. * It explains why the IAEA could intervene in Chernobyl and Fukushima, not the WHO.

The population ignore the statutes of the IAEA, which gives directives or contributes to make decisions after an atomic catastrophe such as Fukushima or Chernobyl. The IAEA before all, has to owe the wording of its statutes. The following lines of this IAEA document, is quoted in IAEA publications, for instance in the Proceedings of the International Conference on Chernobyl in Vienna, 8-12 April 1996. It says that the Agency has as principal objective “to accelerate and enlarge the contribution of atomic industry to peace, health and prosperity throughout the world”.

In other words, this U.N. agency has before all to promote nuclear industries, and support such commercial projects. The IAEA has the highest position compared with other agencies in the hierarchy of the United Nations (UN), including the WHO, FAO, UNICEF and others being controlled by ECOSOP. Furthermore, the WHO from a legal point of view, is not independent or even absent in the field of health and ionizing radiations. The IAEA having to impose its goal, will not admit that severe diseases are due to radiation; this would slow down the spreading and the growth of the nuclear facilities in the world. The guidelines from this agency represent the defense of these commercial structures, but not a protection the population nor a help for victims.

For the national health authorities, the IAEA will be the wrong councilor in case of a nuclear catastrophe. Priority will be given to economical considerations, therefor the attempt to minimize or refute pathologies associated or provoked by artificial radiations will be denied. Wrong estimations may delay the evacuation of heavily irradiated communities.

Shocking and even less understandable in Fukushima, has been the absence of distribution of stable iodine to the whole population, and before all to children, who are more at risk. This prophylactic intervention is not expensive. It would have been efficient and, as shown in Poland by Keath Baverstock, such a campaign is very well tolerated, even if millions of children, who have the greatest need for such a protection, are included. One tablets has to be swallowed, if possible before the wind transporting radioactive iodine, mainly I-131, crosses over the region.

The Journal does not indicate that the first victims of the accident of Fukushima are and will be the children. This starts when the rapidly dividing cells of the embryo makes this stage of development 1000 times more susceptible than adults. Embryos may die, this would correspond to an early subclinical abortion. At birth, up to 5% of the girl babies have been missing the years after the explosion of Chernobyl, compared with the statistics of the years prior to 1986. The highest sex odds, with more than 5% of the female children missing were registered in Belarus and Russia, the countries with the highest radioactive fall-out. Missing girls at birth were also noticed in eastern Europe and Balkans after Chernobyl. Even in Germany there was still a significant deficit in girls at birth. However in France and Spain, with very little or localized radioactive fall-out, no changes of the historical sex odds were found. It shows that the deterioration of the sex odds is proportional to ionizing radiation.

The normal sex ratio, which is a sex odd, corresponds to about 1045 new-born males for 1000 newborn females. This ratio is more or less constant all over the world. There are other examples where the aggravation of the sex odds are increased, connected with increased radioactivity. For instance in the valley of Kerala with a back-ground radioactivity due to monazite, a thorium rich sand, with a six-time increased background activity, leads to a significant increase of congenital new dominant mutations, and Down’s syndrome, as well as an aggravation of the sex odds, compared with the neiboring valley with a normal background radiation. (Padmanabham).

In Chernobyl still-birth and perinatal mortality, as well as congenital defects were noticed. Cardiac defects are often detected much later. Irradiation of fetuses in utero may lead to a significant increase of leukaemia and cancers (brain tumors) as shown in the 50th by Alice Stewart.

In Chernobyl, the incidence of type 1 diabetes mellitus increased in children and especially in small children and infants, where the disease becomes evident due to the coma at entry. This is caused by defects of the immune system or a new mutation. *Usually, hereditary factors may be found in such cases; parents or grand-parents suffered from similar diseases. * In Chernobyl, type 1 diabetes mellitus is missing in the family. The Chernobyl diabetes mellitus of infants or small children appears to be a new disease.

In Belarus, it has been shown that the immune system was heavily affected after the accident. Therefore,

both the white blood cells and the gamma globulins must be studied with a prolonged follow-up in the population of Fukushima (See papers of Pr. Titov). The results should be compared with those of similar research performed in children populations far away from the radioactive fall-out. E.g.: a comparable region around Kobe or Kyoto).

When studying the immune system of irradiated children, attention should be payed to auto-antibodies, agains beta cells of Langerhans islets in the pancreas, and against thyroid cells. Hashimoto’s thyroiditis has the same etiology as type 1 diabetes mellitus. *Other endocrine glands, such as sex hormones producing cells, may be responsible for functional problems especially during puberty: delayed menstruations or even epidemics of male sterility as described in Ukraine. Allergic diseases may also increase in frequency among irradiated children populations. *Again, comparison with communities free of radioactive fall-out will be necessary.

The hypersensitivity of cells (lymphocyte cultures) of irradiated children, after a short X-ray irradiation of the cell culture, should also be studied in Fukushima, as it was done in Chernobyl children by Pr. Pelevina.The alteration of the immune system surely contributes to the increase of infectious diseases in infants and children of Chernobyl, even after years, if children still receive radio-contaminated food. The infections will have a more severe course, with complications and a tendency to become chronic, when compared with children of not radio-contaminated regions.

Ionizing radiation induces a genome instability, which is directly transmissible from generation to generation. This has to be studied and followed-up for generations, starting with the grand-parents now.

The incidence of thyroid cancer extremely rare in small children, may increase even before the fifth year of age; an age where normally only one case in one million small children suffers from this malignant disease. If irradiated in utero or soon after birth, the latency period for this cancer may be very short, and a rapidly invasive papillary cancer of the thyroid can develop in very young children. Chernobyl provoked several other thyroid diseases, such as goiter, thyroiditis and functional disorders. The other cancers have a longer latency period, up to 35 years. Cronberg in Sweden and Okeanov in Belarus found a clear trend for the increase of different cancers 10 years after Chernobyl, and a statistically highly significant increases of all common cancers after 20 years.

Irradiation of young adults leads to premature aging; the early occurrence of cancers being part of this phenomenon. *The increase of cancer was much more pronounced in younger, than in older liquidators of Chernobyl, with the same exposition to radiation. Okeanov showed further more that among liquidators, the duration of the exposition to radiation was a more important risk factor than the dose. (See Proceeding of an intentional conference, IAEA, Vienna, p279, 8-12 April 1996.). When studying problems of cancers, never chose the mortality as parameter, the mortality is declining year after year, but the incidence is growing, especially among irradiated subjects, and the mean age of occurrence may start 20 years too early. There, statistically significant differences may be found in ten to twenty years.

Blindness is also more frequent among young than among older liquidators. It is a degenerative disease of the retina, with microcirculatory disturbance, reaching after a few years the macula.

In Chernobyl the first cause of death due to radiation is not cancer, but cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, with cerebral and cardiac complications. Physicians may protect patients from these complications.

Years after Chernobyl, children with a high burden of Cs-137 in the organism are ill in 80% of the cases, and have often cardiac problems. Prior to Chernobyl and in regions of Belarus with minimal radioactive fallout, only 20% of the children can be considered as non healthy, as it was the case in Belarus before the catastrophe.

Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, and type 1 diabetes mellitus occur in infants at always younger ages. Other endocrine diseases, such as conditions due to anomalies of sex hormones may be responsible for functional problems especially in females during puberty, with delayed menstruations and sterility in male subject.

It is important that similar studies are undertaken in Fukushima, with always a possibly to compare the findings, with a group for comparison, in a similar environment, but no radioactive fall-out. The age, the sex distribution, the professions and standard of living and the density of population should be the same. Radiologically clean regions for comparison, could be selected around Kyoto or Kobe.

Measures to be taken to protect children are before all to prevent the uptake of radionuclides with drinks and food. Clean food and drinks must be given to all children, at home and in school canteens. Holidays in radiologically clean areas are also helpful.

Pectin reduces the uptake of radionuclides, Sr-90. Cs-137 and uranium derivatives. It also accelerates the elimination of radionuclides both with feces and urine. This food additive is Considered by the experts of the Research Laboratory of the European Commission in Ispra, Italy, as safe and efficient for this indication (Nesterenko V.I. & al. SMV 134: 24-27. 2004).

Contaminated children can also be protected with vitamin E and A, as well as carotenes, which act as antioxidants. Mothers should provide carrots, beet ruts and red fruits, containing such antioxidants to their children.

The external radiation dose is much less source of pathologies than internal dose due to incorporated radionuclides, which are chronically accumulated in given organs, Thymus, endocrine glands, spleen, surface of bones and heart. Bandazhevsky demonstrated after Chernobyl (SMW 2003; 133:p488-490) that nearly a two times higher concentrations of Cs-137 is measured at autopsy in organs from children, when compared with the concentration in the organs of adults from the same region. The highest concentrations were measured in the pancreas and the thymus of new-born babies and infants.

Dosimeters distributed to children should be replaced by whole body spectrometers periodically transported in schools for controls. This gives a measure of the Cs-137 load. If the values are above 20 Bq/kg bodyweight, pectin courses may be necessary, and the contaminated food must be replaced by absolutely clean food and clean drinks.

These reflections follow the article of the Mainich Daily News. It confirms that among adults no death related radiation occurred so far. The epidemiological and medical problems are to be studied and treated from birth to puberty by pediatricians, geneticists and immunologists, in irradiated communities. They will compare the present situation in Fukushima with that observed in not radio-contaminated comparable regions. *The cancers epidemic in adults has to be studied in 5 to 25 years from now.

Quote from Michel Fernex, former WHO employee:

“What should WHO have done after Chernobyl?” asked Dr Nabarro, Acting DirectorGeneral of the World Health Organization in 2002. He received an immediate reply: Convene a “Scientific Working Group on “Ionizing Radiation and Genetics” similar to the one in 1956 but add the words “and Genomic Instability”.
It was in response to this question, that the World Health Organization convened a study group in Geneva in 1956, composed of Nobel prize winner in genetics, Professor Muller, and other luminaries of international repute in the field…Together, these scientists reminded us that «the genome is the most valuable treasure of human kind. It determines the life of our descendants and the harmonious development of the future generations. As experts we confirm that the health of future generations is threatened by the expansion of the nuclear industry and the growth of the quantity of radioactive sources. We also consider the fact of appearance of new mutations observed in people to be fatal for them and for their descendants». Since then, a new area of research in genetics has opened up: genomic instability brought about, in particular, by radiation.

In 1986, the Minister of Health in the USSR, asked WHO for assistance for the victims of Chernobyl but WHO did not have the authority to respond to this request. It was therefore the IAEA, whose
mandate is the promotion of civil nuclear energy that set up the International Research Project, in which no mention was made of genetics. Instead, the IAEA gave higher priority to the problem of
dental caries and this became an area of investigation and research.

What genetic damage to the population has resulted from the accident at Fukushima? Is it already recorded in the cells of those workers who have exhausted themselves over the last year in the effort to
limit radioactive contamination of the environment? And what about people who inhaled the radioactive clouds and who ate contaminated food? Have the events of spring 2011 induced genomic
instability? And the children that have been born since, and those who are yet to be born, to mothers or fathers who were exposed to radiation. Have they been affected by the genomic instability of their
parents? Will the effects on them be worse?

What surprises researchers is that the genetic and especially perigenetic damage, responsible for genomic instability, to descendants is much more severe than the damage to parents, and it may get worse from generation to generation. What action should the authorities be taking? With the aid of geneticists, they should try to reduce the genetic damage that renewed contamination could exacerbate. They should reduce internal radiation from incorporated radionuclides that are 10 to 100 times more damaging than the equivalent external dose. They should provide uncontaminated food. In case of contamination, they should accelerate the elimination of the radionuclides with chelators such as pectin from algae, fruits and vegetables. They should help the body to fight the damage done by free radicals or peroxides induced by ionizing radiation by reinforcing the antioxidants in the body with vitamin A and E and by providing natural carotenoids contained in carrots, beetroot, and numerous coloured vegetables and fruit. Children should drink the milk of Jersey cows which is rich in
carotenoids and vitamin A.” http://independentwho.org/media/Documents_IW/Forum_Radioprotection_English_Abstracts_IW_2012.pdf

Even ICRP president admitted the same as WHO’s Margaret Chan:
“there is no dose of radiatoon so low that the risk of malignancy is zero”

AT: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/08/03/safe-radiation-levels-never-get-your-facts-here/

Who Coverup article: http://www.rense.com/general95/whocoverup.html

“HOLOCAUST” versus “NOTHING HAPPENED” : http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/HoloVsNoProb.html

DO NOT TRUST IAEA AND WHO! http://www.independentwho.org

“The splitting of the atom has changed everything except our way of thinking, and thus we drift towards unparalleled catastrophe”. Albert Einstein http://www.icucec.org/files/art-chernobylrem.pdf

Jan Hemmer

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

IT”S THE BEST GLOBAL MEASURMENT RADIATION NETWORK – IT COULD HELP HUMAN KIND. BUT ALL DATA IS COVERED UP!

Fukushima was INES 7 after 3 days – says CTBTO – IAEA ignores, World Health Organisation covers up: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/02/17/tepco-invents-fictitious-measurements-ctbto-data-covered-up/

How they work: http://www.ctbto.org/press-centre/press-releases/2011/ctbto-to-share-data-with-iaea-and-who/

Their cover up birthday party: http://www.ctbto.org/press-centre/press-releases/2012/un-secretary-general-proud-of-15-years-of-successful-fight-against-nuclear-testing-urge-entry-into-force-of-the-ctbt/

And what the UN says: “It is irresponsible to see this treaty still waiting to come into effect 15 years after it was opened for signature.” The unwillingness of the United States to ratify the treaty has been a key obstacle: http://www.thenewage.co.za/43724-1020-53-UN_chief_makes_new_call_for_nuclear_test_ban_implementation

The World Health Organisation WHO has to date the results of measurement to Fukushima under wraps, the WHO and the IAEA regularly receives from the international authority to monitor agreements on nuclear weapons test ban (CTBTO). The world’s 60 monitoring stations of the CTBTO to register around the clock, the radioactivity in the atmosphere.

The “Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics (ZAMG) in Vienna, which also has access to the measurement results of the CTBT0, presented at the end of fixed March with a significantly higher leakage of radioactivity from Fukushima, when the Japanese authorities – based on their data, the WHO and the IAEA – publicly announced. General Secretary Chan of the WHO said the WHO would publish CTBTO measurement data  “only if it’s dangerous values.” If that was the case, they decide “alone”.

At the same time admitted the Director-General, that the WHO is “no expert on radiation,” and that the WHO “on this issue today almost at all has not within the jurisdiction more.” The Department of Radiobiology at the Geneva WHO headquarters was closed two years ago under pressure from private and public donors. Earlier, the deputy head of the department with the attempt to impose lower limits for WHO Iodine intake failed on objections by the IAEA and France: http://www.chernobylcongress.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/Baverstock_How_the_UN_works.pdf

I hereby demand that the results of the analyses conducted to measure the airborne radioactivity by the global network (TICEN) be made public, ENTIRELY AND WITHOUT ANY FURTHER DELAY:

english: http://petitions.criirad.org/?For-a-total-transparency-on-the

請願: http://petitions.criirad.org/?%E8%AB%8B%E9%A1%98%E6%9B%B8,34

française http://petitions.criirad.org/?-Petitions-

with kind regards,

Jan Hemmer

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »