Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘compensation’

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

This articile is reblogged here with the permission of the author of Evacuate-Fukushima.com

ORIGINAL LINK AND ARTICLE: http://www.evacuate-fukushima.com/2015/11/ken-sakamoto-protecting-housing-subsidies-for-evacuees/

迫り来る東京オリンピックにむけ、福島原発事故も含め、2011年の東北地方のトリプル災害から日本が完全に復興したと世界に示すために、安倍晋三と 地方自治体政府は、何千人という避難者に帰還の時期がきたと明言しました。日本政府によると、除染作業が十分に行われた結果、汚染された土地に帰還するこ とに安全上の問題はないということです。しかし、多くの避難者は地方自治体政府による、このプロパガンダ戦略にのらず、当然のことながら、帰還に二の足を 踏んでいます。帰還を促進させるために、政府は2018年には大多数の避難者の住宅支援と賠償を打ち切るという強硬な手段に訴えています

In the light of the upcoming Tokyo Olympics and its bid to show the world that Japan has fully recovered from the triple disaster that hit Tohoku in 2011, including the ongoing nuclear crisis in Fukushima and beyond, Shinzo Abe and local governments have made it clear to tens of thousands of evacuees that it is time to go home. Japan claims that sufficient decontamination work has been concluded to return evacuees safely to their contaminated land. But most aren’t buying into the many propaganda tactics by local governments and are reticent to go back, rightfully so. In order to speed up the return process, the government has adopted drastic measures, such as cutting all housing subsidies and other compensations to most evacuees, by year 2018, forcing evacuees to return.

日本のメディアは殆ど伝えていませんが、福島では帰還政策に対して、住民の広汎な抵 抗が起こり、多くの市民が激しい、献身的な 団体やNPOを結成し、こうした圧力をかけてきている改革に対して闘っています。その最も献身的なリーダーの一人が坂本建さんです。私はSNSを通して、 またEvacuate Fukushima「福島の子供を守れ」のメンバーで私の大事な友人であるYukiko Youngの紹介で、坂本さんと知り合うという幸運に恵まれました。坂本さんは信じがたい人物で全身全霊、福島の子供と居住者の生命を守る闘争に捧げてお られます。

Though poorly reported by the Japanese media, Fukushima has experienced an increasing resistance from residents on this issue and numerous citizens have organized into fierce and dedicated groups and NPOs to fight against these pressuring reforms. One of their most dedicated leader is Ken Sakamoto, which I have had the privilege to meet via social Networks and introduced to me by my dear friend and member of Evacuate Fukushima 福島の子供を守れ; Yukiko Young. Sakamoto san is an incredible human being and is fighting, body and soul, to protect the lives of children and residents in Fukushima.

坂本さんは私たちのインタビューを受けることを了承してくださり、私たちはインタ ビューの結果をできるだけ広く拡散、シェアすることを約束しました。今までメディアが本気を入れずにやってきたよりも、うんと広汎に情報が拡散されること を期待しています。私たちは皆な、福島の忘れられた声を世界に伝えるプラットフォームです。ですので、みなさん、このインタビューを読んで、広くシェアす ることで、ぜひ坂本さんと何千という犠牲者をサポートしてください。インタビューの終わりに寄付のためのリンクがあります。こちらに寄付することで犠牲者 を直接支援することができます。多くの人がどうやって寄付を通して支援できるだろうかという質問を寄せてくださいました。こちらにその回答があります!

Sakamoto san has accepted to interview with us and we have promised to him to SHARE the voices of Fukushima – otherwise silenced by an unwilling media body. So please, support him and the thousands of victims by reading this interview and to share aplenty. At the end of this, you will find links wherein you may donate money that will directly come in help of these victims. Many people have asked me how they could help in terms of donation, this is it!

Nelson

Sakamoto san, thank you for taking the time and effort to speak with us.

You have gone on a 13 days hunger strike as a protest against the Government’s decision to terminate housing subsidies for Fukushima evacuees – which consequently is forcing residents to return with their children to contaminated areas.

Our first question to you though is “how is your health?”. “Are you ok?

Ken Sakamoto

Yes I am absolutely fine and thank you so much for your concern. I would have not been able to complete this hunger strike without the moral support from other evacuees and help from my friends. Before we go further into this, I wish to redirect all acknowledgments directly to those who supported me – anonymously.

Usually, for a hunger strike, the person remains in one place, protesting that way night and day. However, in this case, I only had four days to prepare, from the moment I decided to go ahead with the hunger strike (only water and salt). It was a very short time to prepare. I still had to fulfill other engagements I had previously made in the prefecture of Kanagawa* and also  kept going back and forth to Fukushima prefecture to pursue my claims, speaking on behalf of evacuees. But I did manage to do it all, while restricting myself to salt and water, even during my travels. The best approach to recuperate from a hunger strike is to devote the same amount of days you’ve spent without eating to gradually return to a regular diet. After fasting for 13 days, I started to eat normally the very next day and I was being cautious to drink lots of water, to avoid spicy food and was eating even a bit less, as I had to quickly return to other engagements – but I was listening to my body and felt no particular problems. I was able to get well quickly and move on with my life. I am grateful to everyone who has given me their moral support who definitely helped boosting my physical condition .

THE REST OF THE INTERVIEW: http://www.evacuate-fukushima.com/2015/11/ken-sakamoto-protecting-housing-subsidies-for-evacuees/

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

From the CRMS website:

市民科学者国際会議 アーカイブ映像

講演:午前

松井英介
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/17822655

崎山比早子
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/17824364

講演:午後

セバスチャン・プフルークバイル
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/17951948

沢田昭二
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/17827015

円卓会議:

前半
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/17828447

後半
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/17829634

市民・科学者国際会議: http://www.crms-jpn.com/art/140.html

The International Conference of Citizens and Scientists: Radiation
Health Risks and Thorough Examination of the “International
Expert Symposium in Fukushima — Radiation and Health Risks”

National Olympics Memorial Youth Center, on October 12, 2011

VIDEO: http://en.crms-jpn.com/art/143.html / http://iwakamiyasumi.com/ustream-schedule/ustream2 / http://iwakamiyasumi.com/ustream-schedule/ustream4

Source: http://fr.crms-jpn.com/doc/The%20International%20Conference%20of%20Citizens%20and%20Scientists.pdf / http://en.crms-jpn.com/art/143.html

quote: “In the symposium, “scientific findings” showing low radiation doses are safe were presented in order to “address concerns with the effects of radiation” among the general public, while the “Conclusion and Recommendations” presented at the end offered no proposals or advices to minimize exposure and reduce possible disabilities. All this reminds us of what the IAEA and other UN organizations did with the International Chernobyl Project and the Chernobyl Forum about the health effect of the Chernobyl nuclear accident. The International Chernobyl Project concluded in 1991”

More: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/05/12/w-h-o-secretary-general-chan-admits-for-the-first-time-in-52-years-radiation-is-always-dangerous/ AND: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/09/18/the-atomic-devil-strikes-again-iaea-general-conference-2011-sept-19th-23rd/

and: “E. Cardis at IARC showed that cancers can significantly increase by low dose exposure, based on epidemiological results on the potential effects of external radiation exposure on cohorts of some 200 thousand workers
in the nuclear industry in 15 countries. Referring to these results, the European Committee on Radiation Risk (ECRR) objected to the ICRP risk model for underestimating “low dose internal exposure.” Meanwhile, Belarus and Ukraine epidemiological studies, which have been ignored so far by the international organizations, have reported non-cancerous lateonset disorders due to low dose exposure. They are starting to see the light of day these
years, with the publications like “Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment” (New York Academy of Sciences, 2009) and “Health Effects of Chernobyl 20 years after the reactor catastrophe” (German Affiliate of IPPNW, 2010).”

DOCUMENT: http://www.strahlentelex.de/Yablokov%20Chernobyl%20book.pdf

Background: IAEA / WHO Fukushima Symposium is Japan’s 9/11: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/09/10/this-years-911-will-be-japans-2nd-fukushima-warning/

quote: “The IAEA with it’s partners the atomic industry and military are thinking, that the public opinion is now weak enough, to blast a propaganda symposium into it and all media, along with strong pro nuclear advocats and criminals against humanity WITH: The International Expert Symposium in Fukushima – Radiation and Health Risks – September 11-12, 2011, Fukushima Medical University Their goal: Blaming the victim !”

Please support CRMS & CRIIRAD: http://en.crms-jpn.com/index.html

Or: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/08/16/donate-for-independent-radiation-measurements-in-japan-crms-project-47/

From a child in the future: “What are old persons?”

Life-Upgrade.com

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

子どもたちを放射能から守る福島ネットワーク

Measuring on their own: Parents and youths. They are evacuating on their own.

Website: http://kofdomofukushima.at.webry.info/

Photos: http://webryalbum.biglobe.ne.jp/myalbum/302320700e56781054efa09b742ffab118c63f430/150219016864384031

facebook: http://www.facebook.com/fnscr

More Info (at the end of the video): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QXQ33ffA930

Fukushima Children speaking: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K3II4P2zxUA

Drawings by Fukushima Children: http://strongchildrenjapan.blogspot.com/

Remember: Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology says 3.8 microsieverts per hour o.k., that’s more than 33 millisieverts (mSv) per year. For children, kindergartens, nursery, primary and junior high schools. That’s an equivalent of 50 mammograms. And now add the irradiated food, the irradiatesd water… add the altered genes, mixed up now and in future generations. Human Fetus radiation tolerance: ZERO. Source: http://peaceandhealthblog.com/2011/04/26/children-of-fukushima/ and: http://www.ippnw.de/commonFiles/pdfs/Atomenergie/Reference_Embryo.pdf

Ryuichi Hirokawa has seen it all in Fukushima http://www.telerama.fr/monde/ryuichi-hirokawa-a-tout-vu-a-fukushima,70695.php

with kind regards,

Life-Upgrade.com

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

Donations for independent radiation measurements in Japan:
Subject „Fukushima Projekt 47“

SOURCE: http://www.strahlentelex.de/Stx_11_588_S01-02.pdf

INDEPENDENT RADIATION MEASUREMENTS JAPAN – Citizen’s Radioactivity Measuring Station

Adress: 〒960-8036
Fukushima-shishinmachi 8-8
Meiho Bill 3F
MAIL: info@crms-jpn.com

市民放射能測定所
〒960-8036
福島市新町8丁目8番地
明邦ビル3階
MAIL: info@crms-jpn.com

Japanese: http://www.crms-jpn.com/

English: http://en.crms-jpn.com/index.html

French: http://fr.crms-jpn.com/

Congratulations CRMS! http://www.crms-jpn.com/ Good news! Citizen’s Radioactivity Measuring Station gets support from indepdendent CRIIRAD France

Citizens’ Radioactivity Measuring Station put the German “foodwatch” (consumer organisation) information and petition links on their website! More on CRMS website: english: http://en.crms-jpn.com/art/137.html japanese: http://www.crms-jpn.com/art/135.html french: http://fr.crms-jpn.com/art/136.html and on my blog: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/09/20/german-foodwatch-lower-japanese-500-bequerel-radiation-limit-for-food-to-16-bequerel/

MORE: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/09/20/german-foodwatch-lower-japanese-500-bequerel-radiation-limit-for-food-to-16-bequerel/

Nationwide Soil Testing Project has begun: japanese: http://www.radiationdefense.jp/ english: http://www.radiationdefense.jp/en/investigation

POWERED by CRIIRAD – independent institute – http://www.criirad.org

More background: english: http://www.criirad.org/actualites/dossier2011/japon_bis/en_anglais/criirad11-47ejapan.pdf german: http://www.strahlentelex.de/Stx_11_588_S01-02.pdf IPPNW: http://news.ippnw.de/index.php?id=64#c685 french, english and japanese: http://www.criirad.org/actualites/dossier2011/japon_bis/en_japonais/japonais.html

More on the Fukushima Children network: http://kofdomofukushima.at.webry.info/

with kind regards,

Life-Upgrade.com

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

Belarus is not the last dictatorship in Europe.

It’s the first after Chernobyl.*

*quote: 2009, by Burkhard Homeyer, pastor & chairman “Fund for the Children of Chernobyl”, Germany, Belarus (http://www.bag-tschernobyl.net/wer-wir-sind.html)

Evacuation-Ready Zone to Be Abolished on September 30: http://ex-skf.blogspot.com/2011/09/radiation-in-japan-evacuation-ready.html

Lukashenka wants to repopulate Chernobyl Chernobyl’s Zone “quickly” http://charter97.org/en/news/2009/4/26/17680/

The secret Agenda of Japan & IAEA is in full effect. Like in Belarus, where 72% of the Chernobyl fallout went down.

Principal Sawai of Yumoto Daini Middle School, Iwaki City, Fukushima: “The radiation problem is already finished,” he told the children and their parents. “You can go to school and go outside without any problem. You should not fear malicious gossip.” SOURCE: http://japanfocus.org/-Makiko-Segawa/3516

1996 said the belarusian president Lukashenko during a meeting of the IAEA: “We encourage people to come back. We will open the shops again and enable the people to return to their evacuated towns and villages.”

National statements were made by the President of Belarus, Mr. A. Lukashenko:

http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Magazines/Bulletin/Bull383/box1.html

http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/1996/inf510.shtml

quote: “Lukashenko, as far as I understand, is doing it somewhat surreptitiously. It is not an open process. There are reports, for instance, of encouraging agriculture, redeveloping dairying and forestry operations, and encouraging people either to resettle or to move into contaminated areas.” – from (page 51): http://www.wilsoncenter.org/topics/pubs/OP295.pdf

BELARUS adopted a new program, that killed financial support for irradiated areas:
http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/NesterenkoChernobyl-Belarus.pdf

March 20, 1997:

President Lukashenko has ordered university graduates to teach in areas affected with high levels of radiation from Chernobyl: http://www.russianmeetingplace.com/forums/russia-ukraine-belarus-travel-news/topic.php/312-1.html

Lukashenko sends grads to contaminated areas: http://www.lindsayfincher.com/lukashenko-sends-grads-to-contaminated-areas.html

His statements of “overcoming Chernobyl” can be found from page 47 on, http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub1001_web.pdf ONE DECADE AFTER
CHERNOBYL Summing up the Consequences of the Accident Proceedings of an International Conference Vienna, 8-12 April 1996

Angela Merkel IGNORES all data and Chernobyl studies, showing an increase in diseases, mutation, disbility, mortality and morbidity and so on. EVIDENCE: http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/Pub1001_web.pdf ANGELA MERKEL said in 1996 at the IAEA meeting: page 51: “This week’s conference is an attempt to formulate a synthesis from the results of the meetings of the WHO in Geneva, the European Commission in Minsk and the International Forum on Nuclear Safety Aspects here in Vienna.(…) We must assess the epidemiological findings for other types of cancer, in particular with regard to leukaemia, which has always been thought to be the most sensitive indicator for exposure to radiation. There have not yet been any cases of leukaemia attributable to the disaster. What does this mean for the future? In this connection we will have to examine what this means for the development of other tumours or other health effects as the results of exposure to radiation.We think that we know that these effects on health are psychological consequences of the accident, the general uncertainty about the actual situation, as well as other stress factors, e.g. resettlement. This was associated with a disruption of social networks. Several hundred thousand people were evacuated or resettled, with enormous social implications. At the same time we can see an increase in the accumulation of specific diseases — not yet regarded as radiation induced — particularly among children.” SHE IGNORES 1000,000 ill Chernobyl children. (pure PR, with a foto of her in 1996 at the IAEA together, where also president Lukashenko of Belarus was and demanded Come back to irradiated areas, people!: http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Magazines/Bulletin/Bull383/38304781423.pdf)

The 1996 IAEA Conference has a successor: The 2011 Fukushima Symposium: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/09/10/this-years-911-will-be-japans-2nd-fukushima-warning/

PART 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRl7t_yhZhM PART 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xL3MiDEtrA At Minute 11:21: The Government wants the people to return to Fukushima!

Japan Forced School Children To Clean Radioactive Dirt From Swimming Pools: http://www.examiner.com/civil-rights-in-jersey-city/japan-forced-school-children-to-clean-radioactive-dirt-from-swimming-pools

CENSORSHIP is the only HELP radiation vicitims get.

Riot policemen against participants of “Chernobyl Way” in Minsk (Photo, video) http://charter97.org/en/news/2009/4/26/17678/

Livestream from Tokyo anti nuclear demonstrations and crackdown by Riot Police: http://www.ustream.tv/channel/kamatayusuke#utm_campaign=t.co&utm_source=7970606&utm_medium=social

http://news.3yen.com/2011-09-11/japanese-police-attack-an-anti-nuclear-protest-in-tokyo/

Chernobyl’s Hostages: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/en/Novosti.html#Yr9904 – quote “What could they do in that situation? They made the most simplest decision – to return to the contaminated zones. Why? Because it is at least a week guarantee that they will have Chernobyl’s compensations for those remaining. For example, people living in zones of eviction have the right to receive 50 rubles per month (today it is about 2 USD). People working in that zones have rights to receive 300 rubles per month (it is about 12 USD). Taking into account that the average salary in Novozubkovo is 290 rubles per month, it is not difficult to imagine how such little money is important for the people.” More: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/en/Novosti.html

This is an example from Japan: http://fukushima-diary.com/2011/08/column-what-is-the-purpose-of-people-to-call-us-paranoid/

Japan could use the The daiyo kangoku justice system (http://www.amnesty.org/en/region/japan/report-2011) against whistleblowers and civil society. And Saiban-in (Lay Judge) System http://www.amnestyusa.org/research/reports/annual-report-japan-2011?page=2

Japanese government killing its own people in Fukushima – Offficals running away during public hearing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVuGwc9dlhQ

Anger in Japan Over Withheld Radiation Forecasts http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/09/world/asia/09japan.html?_r=2&pagewanted=all%3Fsrc%3Dtp

Japan’s throwaway workers: http://mg.co.za/article/2011-06-27-japans-throwaway-nuclear-workers/

This company http://www.adk.jp/ made a contract with Resources and Energy Agency for 70,000,000JPY to monitor internet.
Welcome to the battle field. (thanks to Sakurako for this information): This is how REAL (government made) radiation protection looks like: CENSORSHIP. This is all they do.

Japanese civil society: http://www.asahi.com/english/TKY201107270451.html

The only anti nuc government bureaucrat, Mr Koga (thanks Mochizuki Cheshire Iori) : https://twitter.com/#!/hasegawa24

Quote by Mariko Ichikawa, head of a consumer group from July 23rd 2011:

Experts say there is no effect on health if you eat a small amount of meat with the current [low] level of contamination. It may be necessary to check all meat cows in Fukushima Prefecture, but is it necessary for the government to use a large amount of taxpayers’ money to buy the [contaminated] meat and burn it? We need more discussion”

and:

“I want everyone to remember the BSE crisis in the US, when people trusted the domestic beef. ”

Original japanese Source: http://mainichi.jp/select/opinion/closeup/news/20110723ddm003040079000c.html

Translation: http://ex-skf.blogspot.com/2011/07/japanese-consumer-advocates-scold.html

We do not need more discussion. We need to understand, that radionuclides in food cause no immediate dangers, because of the latency of Cesium 137 and Strontium 90, for example.

BSE is not subtantial equivalent to radiation. One is radiation of radionuclides with a halflife (30 years, but 300 years biological) the other is a Brain disease epidemic (BSE).

The statement of Mariko Ichikawa is criminal.

Here is a cry for survival from Fukushima with english subtitles: http://www.universalsubtitles.org/ja/videos/o9gtNtWoaqpZ/

Need more background? Listen to one of the leading atomic scientsts on earth: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/07/18/scientist-chris-busby-in-japan-reports/

http://www.wat.tv/video/japan-fukushima-dr-chris-busby-3wtpt_31wod_.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxOupFH-a-A

One Japanese Citizen’s View of Fukushima Anarch: http://akiomatsumura.com/2011/07/one-japanese-citizens-view-of-fukushima-anarchy.html

DIARY of a Fukushima liquidator: http://yfrog.com/user/Happy20790/profile

Over 2,600 Meat Cows Suspected of Being Fed with Radioactive Rice Hay:

Original japanese Source: http://www.tokyo-np.co.jp/s/article/2011072301000673.html

Translation: http://ex-skf.blogspot.com/2011/07/over-2600-meat-cows-suspected-of-being.html

High Level of Plutonium rumored to have been detected in rice paddies 50 km from Fukushima I:

http://ex-skf.blogspot.com/2011/07/high-level-of-plutonium-rumored-to-have.html

Radioactive iodine found in breast milk of Japanese mothers:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/japan/8465248/Radioactive-iodine-found-in-breast-milk-of-Japanese-mothers.html

Report from Japan: http://www.dianuke.org/mochizuki-ioris-report-from-japan-4/

Japan: Science VS Politicians: http://ex-skf.blogspot.com/2011/07/part-2-professor-tatsuhiko-kodama-of.html

Cesium 137 in Japan’s food chain:

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-07-24/threat-to-japanese-food-chain-multiplies-as-cesium-contamination-spreads.html

Herbs? Clay? Cure? That’s un ethic money making by esoteric people and business men.

Here is an article of the belarusian independent newspaper “Luninetz Progulka” – one of only 15 remaining independent in whole Belarus! This article speaks about the reduction of financial suppoert for irradiated areas and “ending Chernobyl” – it was a official decision by the government!

This is me and the deputy editor, in June 2011:

Read this: Since 2006, non-state Newspaper Inform-progulka Is prohibited for Sale at Newspaper Kiosk

Source: http://spring96.org/en/news/15916

quote “The almost absence of an independent press in Belarus leads to two central problems for the democratic opposition: on one hand their publicity and effectiveness is low and on the other hand, the state press is aggressively used as a propaganda tool against the independent press – and not just since the events following the presidential election.”: http://www.lphr.org/en/news/news-details/article/printmedien-in-belarus/

Will happen with newspapers in Japan also.

Japan officials are going to call radiation measurements illegal and that they are disturbing the industry. Health plays no role. They are adapting the IAEA ideology of Radiophobia: The fear of radiation is worse than the radiation. Civil Society with it’s Fukushima NGOs will become a threat to the poitical level and hunted down like in Belarus.

Dear Japan. Welcome to the Atomic State. A modern dictatorship. Where the Victims become the Offenders.

The health standard in Japan: 100 Millisieverts is o.k.

Original Japanese Source: http://www.asahi.com/special/10005/TKY201107210634.html

Translation: http://ex-skf.blogspot.com/2011/07/radiation-in-japan-100-millisieverts-in.html

Japan launches PR drive for nuclear power: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/japan/8600981/Japan-launches-PR-drive-for-nuclear-power.html

over 1300 cattle suspected of radiation contamination shipped: http://www.japantoday.com/category/national/view/over-1300-cattle-suspected-of-radiation-contamination-shipped

Even 250 Millisievert are o.k.

Please be aware, that 100 mSv represent an equivalent of 200 mammograms!

Japan increased the dose limit for children by 2000 percent: Which is now 20 mSv / per year -> 50 mammograms for every child PER YEAR.

If they increase the dose limit, there will be nothing left to censor!

The devil is relying on the bible. By the way death penalty is in Japan as in Belarus.

Soon, Japan will struck of irradiated areas from the radiation map, just like Belarus did: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2008/05/14/government-1000-villages-struck-off-from-being-contaminated/

THIS WILL HAPPEN IN JAPAN: Stopping compensation and support for irradiated areas:

PAGE 62: http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/NesterenkoChernobyl-Belarus.pdf

And it will lead to: criminal humanitarian programs: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/03/18/core-a-chernobyl-aid-program-that-kills/

“If we continue to treat them like victims, they feel like victims,” quote by Zoya I. Trafimchik, coordinator of the CORE programme

The costs of the atomic accident, tsnuami and earthquake are invaluable, because the full impact on human health is yet to come:

 https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/03/19/effect-of-cesium-and-strontium-on-japanese-children-japanese-officals-irresponsible/

quote: “In about 4 years we’re going to see the same with japanese children.

Quiet Death.

The then children are already suffering much earlier – often with fatal consequences.

The cesium is present in the inheritance cells.

Precarious, is that the cesium implants in the ovaries and the eggs of women. Because renew their loans, they are damaged for life.

Although renewed in sperm, they also give more information to the injury during fertilization. Either, it can no longer be fathered children, or they get through father and mother misinformation in the future. The result you can not even imagine.

The authorities in Japan had long ago have put women and children in the south of the country. Why they did not is, in my view, totally incomprehensible. There will be massive leukemia. This cesium cloud is a disaster for the Japanese, and from all other radionuclides, we know nothing.

The body can not distinguish between Calcium and Strontium. If it is taken in through the food chain. It is built into the bones and teeth, shines there and hits the bone marrow, where sit the blood-forming organs: The stem cells that give rise to the red and white blood cells and platelets.

These cells are damaged by Strontium, and indeed a lifetime, because the strontium remains where it is: irradiating with short and beta radiation.”

Costs make pressure. Pressure destroys the democracy. No country in the world can pay for an atomic accident. Not a single reactor is assured, it’s simpy too expensive:

http://www.atomhaftpflicht.de/hintergruende.php3

Human Health costs and nuclear energy:

http://ratical.org/radiation/inetSeries/

Killing our own:

The Disaster of America’s Experience
with Atomic Radiation
Harvey Wasserman & Norman Solomon

the complete 1982 book: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/KillingOurOwn/

Belarus is transforming into a 2nd generation of some kind of Atomic State (Before: Chernobyl, Now: Reactor). Which means everyone who speaks against atomic power is an enemy of the state. New developments are under way: Belarusian officials detain over 450 after rally: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5ht93_cpV6vNi4Z5PsSGCiTOtxLGQ?docId=e6806b5fd8b240bbae405d2bfd098e74&index=0

More photos: http://toxaby.livejournal.com/514571.html?view=11193611

After leaving Areva, SIEMENS (web) cooperates with ROSATOM (web) – the russian concern, which started building the first Belarusian atomic reactor. Belarus is the most Chernobyl affected country in the world. Still more than 2 million people are living in contaminated areas there.

This is how the situation is Belarus is RIGHT NOW:

https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/nuclear-energy-takes-you-as-hostage/

I wrote on March 15th 2011: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/03/15/fukushima-the-iaea-strategy/

The IAEA wants the people make believe, that the main effect of the atomic catastrophe is psychological. This is made in these steps:

– Make the people believe, that because of background radiation every additional radiation is natural, normal, not bad (known as the principle of “substantial equivalence”)

– Tell the people, that Fukushima is not as bad as Chernobyl, and, Chernobyl was a small accident (50 deaths acc. to WHO, 125,000 deaths acc. to Ukrainian health minisry 1993).

– Make the people believe, that any other statement is panic and unobjective (The IAEA uses the word “Radiophobia” for Chernobyl)

– The IAEA recognizes the disease in highly contaminated areas as not in connection with the contamination.

– Make sure that there are no independent measurements, only measurements by the atomic power plant operator, it is also important NOT to show radiation measurements during the TV weather forecasts.

– Make sure that there are no organized measurements at all, for each region, each plant, each city – especially not in the media. Or do reconstrucion on the basis of official data, which are often too low.

Advise the officals with authentic language

Advise the government to install a 30 km No Enter Zone – invented and used during the atomic weapon test in the U.S. – but 30 km is not enough for an atomic reactor accident.

Refuse cancer studies like the german KiKK study as unscientific

Raise radiation limits for different groups of people, so that different values can be measured but each is normal, and below the limt

Prof. Hiroaki Koide concludes that if Tokyo has been contaminated this much, then ‘areas within Fukushima prefecture must be seriously contaminated’.

http://www.infiniteunknown.net/2011/06/16/prof-hiroaki-koide-of-kyoto-university-on-the-ugly-truth-about-the-nuclear-disasters-of-chernobyl-and-fukushima-video/

Japanese government wants to reduce evacuation zone:
http://mdn.mainichi.jp/mdnnews/national/archive/news/2011/07/15/20110715p2g00m0dm012000c.html

Prime minister Kan traveled to Fukushima on Saturday July 16th to talk with local officials.

Minami Soma city is asking all the evacuees to come back to their land:
http://mainichi.jp/area/yamagata/news/20110712ddlk06040136000c.html

Russian activist released from Belarusian jail after protesting against the new belarusian reactor: http://www.anti-atom.ru/en/node/1301

When the kiss of the mother is deadly for the child:

The ICRP says  “The cancer risk goes up by 0.5% with 100 millisieverts exposure.”

Well, that’s the ICRP: A direct servant of the atomic industry itsel. I qoute myself again: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/03/22/iaea-uncesco-icrp-playing-down-radiation-in-fukushima-and-chernobyl-is-scientifically-valid/

The following is from Dr. Katsumi Furitsu (her speech on youtube) (this is a report about Fukushima, by her), Research Committee of the atomic bomb victims at Hannan Chuo Hospital, Osaka, Japan:

Report of the International Komietees the IAEA in 1991: The international Chernobyl project, assess the effects on health and the environment and evaluation of radiation protection measures. Presentation 1991, in Vienna. Chairman of the Committee, Dr Itsuzo Shigematsu – also chairman of the Researching the effects of radiation -> RERF (web) in Hiroshima Institute.
He set up the limit of the dose for the resettlement and maximum values for contaminated food.

http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub884e_web.pdf

Source: ICRP: Protection of the Public in the Event of Major Radiation Accidents: Principles and Planing – ICRP Publication 40th Annuals of the ICRP, 14, no. 2. 1984
ICRP: Principles for intervention of Protection of the Public in a Radiological Emergency. ICRP Publication 63rd 1993

The IAEA has criticized the RCRP, they should apply the ICRP guidelines. This means that people relocating is unnecessary if the level of individual radiation mSv in the first year after an accident does not exceed 500. (ICRP 1984) If this dose is short, there are acute Radiations symptoms. 500 mSv are also equivalent of 1.7 km distance to Ground Zero in Hiroshima.
Nov. 1992: The ICRP INCREASED the dose for the evacuation in 1Sv – the equivalent to 1.3 km to the Hiroshima Ground Zero.

This means the continuation of nuclear power, even if people die.

1992: increased occupational radiation ICRP recommends to 0.05 Sv / year.
IAEA and WHO deny leukemia in connection with radiation.

1954 ICRP was an organisation of 13 male members.  Till 1990 the first woman came to them…

They made the recommendations for radiation protection norms, which were accepted by all countries, and which (very important!) justified the set of regulations of the IAEA. Interesting isn’t it? Here is one:
ICRP said, the tritium emission (from atomic power plants) in water should be 40.000 Bq. And now the crazy progress of the ICRP: In 1990 they said: Lets make 7000 Bq/ litre. This was proved by ACES (Comitee for environmental standards). They said: Wrong housenumber, change the 7000 (Because of cancer danger). They also said: Lower it to 100 Bq in five years until you get 20 Bq / Litre.

I think its a big difference between 40.000 and 20, don’t you?

That’s why we should never tolerate a number for low radiation emission from atomic power plants.

But the IAEA uses them in a very cruel way, since the Chernobyl reactor explosion in 1986. If you read through a paper from 1990 (called “Document Nr. 60 1990), written by the ICRP you find the description

“temporary radiation effect”.

Effects which they did not find heavy enough in order that the effected people can be compensated.

Japanese people hear it from Fukshima day One: “Panic and fear of radiation is much worse than radiation itself


This statement is used by the IAEA for Chernobyl victims.

The IAEA ignores cancer, leukemia, diabetes, trisomy 21, all kinds of illness, all kinds of cancer in connection with radiation, especially low radiation.

The IAEA calls it “Radiophobia”: http://www.iaea.org/inis/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/31/017/31017716.pdfthis is what Japan now uses for their anti radiation fear propaganda.

The present and future victims are perceived as a disturbance to the atomic industry, to the japanese government, to the companies running atomic plants. They are going to end it.

Since the foundation of the IAEA their purpose is: To serve and protect the atomic industry in these five countries: USA, Russia, China, France, Britain.

They also monopolized public health during and after atomic accidents, by the gag contract WHA 12-40 between them and the WHO (1959). SOURCE

ICRP totally gave up tp IAEA. IAEA is doing ICRP work today. And more: IAEA is selling the “peacefull atomic energy theory” worldwide. Although peaceful atomic reactos do develop low radiation (whose effects IAEA does try to deny) and weapon-ready Plutonium. It’s a BIG money game they are playing for decades and which will end hopefully soon (Uranium range: 60 years and below).

ICRP is NOT the organisation (in my opinion) which is in charge to protect the workers of the atomic industry. The ICRP does make down-the-lines and brings economic “imperative” into account. ICRP is not the advocator for radiation protection. Are there ICRP members who do have an apprenticeship in public health or industrial medicine?

More background: HOW MUCH RADIATION? http://www.ratical.org/radiation/KillingOurOwn/KOO12.html

ICRP members are profiteers of the atomic industry, just like the IAEA. Don’t expect to them to make radiation safety for YOU. This is an evidence that our modern society seems to have big problems.

Critique of ICRP structure and membership by Dr. Rosalie Bertel: http://ratical.org/radiation/inetSeries/wwc2_10.txt

quotes:
“The Board (AECB Canada) relies heavily on the recommendations of international agencies and committees. Two of the most important of which are the ICRP and UNSCEAR.”

“The dominant expertise among ICRP  membership  between 1950  and  1985  was physicists, with one biophysicist (46.9% of the person years). ”

“Clearly when practically all members  are  in  the  pay  of their  respective governments, ICRP cannot claim to be free of all bias, conflict of interest or  government  pressure.”

Membership in ICRP appears to  be  made  on  the  basis  of occupational  affiliation  with  national  nuclear research (military  or  commercial)  and  regulatory  agencies.   It clearly  provides  a forum for dialogue on nuclear policies and standards  among  nations  with  a  clear  governmental standardize  their “story” relative to the health trade off (risks) of their nuclear activities (benefits).”

UNSCEAR, as all United Nations Agencies, is an organization of  delegates sent by member governments.  It does not make recommendations on radiological health and safety practices but serves primarily as an information gathering agency.

quotes by UNSCEAR from: http://ratical.org/radiation/CNR/NoSafeThresh.html / What Is Factually Wrong with This Belief:   “Harm from  Low-Dose Radiation Is Just Hypothetical — Not Proven”

“”The extent to which radiation-induced DNA damage may be correctly repaired at very low doses and very low dose rates is beyond the resolution of current experimental techniques. If DNA double-strand breaks are critical lesions determining a range of cellular responses, including perhaps neoplastic transformation, then it may be that wholly accurate cellular repair is unlikely even at the very low lesion abundance expected after low dose and low-dose-rate irradiation.”

UNSCEAR 1993 Report, p.634, para.74.”

“”It is highly unlikely that a dose threshold exists for the initial molecular damage to DNA, because a single track from any ionizing radiation has a finite probability of producing a sizable cluster of atomic damage directly in, or near, the DNA. Only if the resulting molecular damage, plus any additional associated damage from the same track, were always repaired with total efficiency could there be any possibility of a dose threshold for consequent cellular effects.”

UNSCEAR 1993 Report, p.636, para.84.”

“Biological effects are believed to arise predominantly from residual DNA changes that originate from radiation damage to chromosomal DNA. It is the repair response of the cell that determines its fate. The majority of damage is repaired, but it is the remaining unrepaired or misrepaired damage that is then considered responsible for cell killing, chromosomal aberrations, mutations, transformations and cancerous changes.”

UNSCEAR 1993 Report, p.680-681, para.323.”

“The BEIR Committees are heavily staffed with personnel from U.S.  Government  nuclear research laboratories such as Oak Ridge and Brookhaven, and with researchers from the  atomic bomb  research centers at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.  There is a greater breadth of expertise on the BEIR Committees  than on  ICRP  and  much  more  internal  dissent.  However, the Committee assumes an  adversarial  rather  than  scientific role. “

“The delegates to ICRP, UNSCEAR and  BEIR  chosen  by  their respective  governments  have  both  personal  and national compelling reason for perpetuating their  closed  structure and secrecy.”

Why BEIR VII (Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation) plays in the hand of atomic industry – quote “they rely on data from Hiroshima and Nagasaki to assess for low dose exposure in humans. BEIR VII is assessing continuous or routine low doses, but data from Hiroshima and Nagasaki are not adequate predictors of the full range of health effects for various types of exposure…”

Source: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/BEIR7pronuke.html

Excerpts from the book “No Immediate Danger, Prognosis for a Radioactive Earth, by Dr Rosalie Bertell ” (http://www.ratical.org/radiation/NRBE/NRBEtoc.html)

ICRP: More about Radiaton Protection Standards: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/NRBE/NRBE11.html

ICRP: Failure to Audit Health: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/NRBE/NRBE12.html

“Activists from Belarus and Germany arrested brutally at peaceful anti-nuclear action

Minsk, 25th April, 18.35 belarussian time. 6 activists from germany and 5 activists from Belarus, as well as one activist from Poland have been brutally arrested.

Around 40 activists have protested peacefully against the construction of the first nuclear power in Ostrovetz, Belarus. They held banners saying «Chernobyl, Fukushima — Ostrovets?» and «We are against nuclear power plants» and gave out leaflets. There were two flashmobs – the first lasted around 5 min.

However, the second flashmob was interrupted immediately. After around one minute two vehicles with civil police stopped, as well as a red prisoner’s transport. Peaceful protestors were thrown to the ground and arrested using brutal force.

Against all nuclear power installations! No newbuild of nuclear power plants — in Belarus or anywhere! Solidarity with political prisoners!

http://de.indymedia.org/2011/04/305841.shtml

You think it’s only Japan and Belarus? Think again:

Tim DeChristopher’s Imprisonment: Our Call to Action! http://www.peacefuluprising.org/tim-dechristophers-imprisonment-our-call-to-action-20110726

France: Atomic Industry knows no freedom of speech: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/07/12/france-atomic-industry-knows-no-freedom-of-speech-the-epr-junk-reactor/

5,000,000 Beq/L is a quote by Dr Ian Fairlie (UK) from the Committee Examining Radiation Risks of Internal Emitters founded by UK Government in 2001– made public by the IPPNW (nobel peace prize 1985) on Sept.16th 2010. It’s common science now and not conspiracy: http://www.ippnw2010.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Press/WOZ_37_S5.pdf

This is a statement of the pro nuclear IAEASignificant activity of tritium is escaping into air by the way of the cooling towers” at: 4th Meeting WG7, 6 – 9 September 2010, Aix-en-Provence, France: http://www-ns.iaea.org/downloads/rw/projects/emras/emras-two/first-technical-meeting/fourth-working-group-meeting/working-group-presentations/workgroup7-presentations/presentation-4th-wg7-czech-npp.pdf

MORE: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/07/18/reactors-emitting-tritium-during-normal-mode-children-cancer/

quote by Dr. Rosalia Bertell, November 1999 issue of The Ecologist, pp. 408-411: http://ratical.org/radiation/NAvictims.html

The main way in which the “radiation protection industry” has succeeded in hugely underrating the ill-health caused by nuclear power is by insisting on a group of extremely restrictive definitions as to what qualifies as a radiation-caused illness statistic. For example, under IAEA’s criteria:

>    If a radiation-caused cancer is not fatal, it is not counted in the IAEA’s figures

>    If a cancer is initiated by another carcenogen, but accelerated or promoted by exposure to radiation, it is not counted.

>    If an auto-immune disease or any non-cancer is caused by radiation, it is not counted.

>    Radiation-damaged embryos or foetuses which result in miscarriage or stillbirth do not count

>    A congenitally blind, deaf or malformed child whose illnesses are are radiation-related are not included in the figures because this is not genetic damage, but rather is teratogenic, and will not be passed on later to the child’s offspring.

>    Causing the genetic predisposition to breast cancer or heart disease does not count since it is not a “serious genetic disease” in the Mendelian sense.

>    Even if radiation causes a fatal cancer or serious genetic disease in a live born infant, it is discounted if the estimated radiation dose is below 100 mSv [mSv= millisievert, a measurement of radiation exposure. One hundred millsievert is the equivalent in radiation of about 100 X-Rays].

>    Even if radiation causes a lung cancer, it does not count if the person smokes — in fact whenever there is a possibility of another cause, radiation cannot be blamed.

>    If all else fails, it is possible to claim that radiation below some designated dose does not cause cancer, and then average over the whole body the radiation dose which has actually been received by one part of the body or even organ, as for instance when radio-iodine concentrates in the thyroid. This arbitrary dilution of the dose will ensure that the 100 mSv cut-off point is nowhere near reached. It is a technique used to dismiss the sickness of Gulf War veterans who inhaled small particles of ceramic uranium which stayed in their lungs for more than two years, and in their bodies for more than eight years, irradiating and damaging cells in a particular part of the body.

war is going on.

It was made publicly known in 1953 when President Dwight D. Eisenhower declared war upon every citizen and human being with “The Peaceful Atom”. It was then further developed in 1954 with the first hydrogen bomb testing which changed the most important international program for radiation protection and compensation: THE ALARA PRINCIPLE: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/03/21/iaea-and-icrp-the-alara-principle/, the h bomb testing is the successor to the Hiroshima / Nagasaki testing (!). The BASE for ALL RADIATION LIMITS is the T65D Study (Tentative Dose Estimate compiled in 1965): http://www.rerf.or.jp/glossary_e/t65d.htm For validation of this study the US even did an atomic test in Nevada: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/212/4497/900.extract

The indirect chemical damage to cell membranes in the low dose range is much more important than the direct effect of radiation on the nucleus with its genetic material. In the nucleus there appears to be much stronger repair mechanisms than in the cell membranes. This is consistent with the purposes of evolution: Increasingly higher development of life. First and foremost, namely the genes in the nucleus had greatly developed by repair mechanisms to be protected. Only then could the nature of the gene pool protect itself against the highly damaging properties of natural radiation, and thus maintain the relative stability of species over millions of years.

Sources:

> Petkau A. Effects of 22 Na + on phospholipid membrane injury to irradiated erythrocytes. Radiation Research 1968, 34:335-346.
>Sternglass EJ. Implication of dose-rate dependent cell-membrane damage for the biological effets of medical and environmental radiation. Proceedings of the symposium on population exposures, Knoxville TN, October 21-23, 1974. (CONF-741 018)

But in contrast to the gene pool, individual members of populations (plants, animals, people) for the evolution are not so important to the contrary, her constant death and her replacement by reproduction is an important evolutionary process. The repair mechanisms in the cell membranes were needed, but weren’t  so important, because you only caused diseases, but no genetic defects. And if one member of a population has fulfilled its evolutionary role of reproduction, sit is no longer needed, so a life extension beyond the reproductive age is also not absolutely necessary. This is for the survival of animals and plant species are not necessarily problematic, however, for human society. Each individual hopes to a long and healthy life, far beyond reproduction age. In addition, an adaptation to environmental toxic substances in humans is not possbile, because of the generational change phaes which are very long. But we add more radiation by atomic energy with it’s low radiation emission, accidents, catastrophes – which are peeks.

regards,

Life-Upgrade.com

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) was replaced by: As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP): To satisfy the ALARP principle, measures necessary to reduce risk must be taken until or unless the cost of those measures, whether money, time or trouble is disproportionate to the reduction in risk.” PAGE 170 – by UK Departement of Energy & Climatechange – QUOTE:

http://www.decc.gov.uk/assets/decc/11/meeting-energy-demand/consents-planning/nps2011/1925-appl-of-sust-of-revised-draft-en6.pdf

basically: Money over Health – a licence to kill. In the beginning the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle was turned against the atomic industry. It said, that radiation exposure has to be held as low as possible, that means as low as rasonably achievable. But hydrogen bombs cause much radiation.The ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection) turned around this principle (after the first hydrogen bomb explosion in 1954) – so that the ALARA principle is now working FOR the atomic industry, even if a reactor crashes next to you. ICRP said, that ALARA does not refer to accidents. Basically this means:

When an accident happens (an atomic reactor crash, for example) the whole point of Status Quo is that the people are contaminated with radiation.

They can irradiate you and do not compensate you – and if they do, they do it with your money. No reactor is assured, mind you.

Used in Belarus (Most Chernobyl affected country in the world) and Japan (Fukushima).

EXELON nuclear (US company) talking about ALARA:  http://www.decc.gov.uk/ass​ets/decc/11/meeting-energy​-demand/consents-planning/​nps2011/1925-appl-of-sust-​of-revised-draft-en6.pdf

Remember: This is the only VALID and OFFICIAL angenda for compensation during an atomic accident!

 

regards,

Life-Upgrade.com

Read Full Post »