Posts Tagged ‘AEC’


NEW: Protect the children of Japan against radiation exposure 福島の子供を守れ

In 1970 it was proven that human fetus is 500 times more vulnerable to radiation. And in 1978 this was released in the bulletin of atomic scientists: http://books.google.de/books?id=aAoAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA30&lpg=PA30&dq=cancer+stewart+xray+1970+radiographs&source=bl&ots=UGZYt0TZGo&sig=ENE9wYZjjNs3Rh2XyptdZwP3Ucw&hl=de&ei=7545Tu6iF8aAOsLrvbMG&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&sqi=2&ved=0CBsQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false

ICRP has confirmed in 1966 that natural radiation is harmful! ICRP Publication Number 8 from 1966 on page 60. in relation to the health damage caused by natural radiation for the bulk of the world’s population is a risk of sixth order (1 to 10 dead per million per rad / gray) in a few areas with high natural background radiation the risk fifth order. 10 to 100 dead per million and rad (gray). and in 1977 the ICRP publication number 26 said, that, in this sense, regional differences of the natural radiation are so regarded, that the corresponding differences include the damage. and in the ’80s the natural radiation was simply doubled. and in 2011 it became the twentyfold in japan: 20 mSv/a. Natural radiation is used as an excuse to increase artificial radiation with radionuclide-antagonists.

They call that radiation-protection!

Internal Dose for japanese Infants: 1 SIEVERT per year: http://www.strahlentelex.de/RadiationRisk_EU_042011_engl.pdf

“According to the ICRP in 1991, just 5 mSv to the testes could cause damage to offspring – yet this dose was permitted yearly to members of the public, and ten times more was permitted to nuclear workers, in all countries prior to 1990. It continues today to be permitted yearly for nuclear workers in most countries.” http://iicph.org/victims_of_the_nuclear_age

1971: the discoverer of plutonium and president of the USAEC Glenn Theodore Seaborg resigns – at the same time the ICRP reduced the additional maximum dose near reactors for the public from 500 mrem/annual (5 mSv/a) to 5 mrem/annual (0,05 mSv/a).

the USAEC “protects” health and advertises nuclear industry at the same time, later renamed in AEC, then renamed in NRC.

Source NRC (USAEC / AEC before): http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/32111590/seaborg-resigns-from-aec

Source (ICRP 5 mSv/a): http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2596042/pdf/yjbm00117-0064.pdf

! no coincidence !

Thanks to Prof. Ernest Sternglass and his studies about infant mortality near reactors;: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/inetSeries/ejs1192.html

And, in 1991, the ICRP lowered the standard from 5 mSv /a to 1 mSv/a: “For occupational exposure in planned exposure situations the Commission now recommends an equivalent dose limit for the lens of the eye of 20 mSv in a year, averaged over defined periods of 5 years, with no single year exceeding 50 mSv.” page 1:  Source: http://www.icrp.org/docs/ICRP%20Statement%20on%20Tissue%20Reactions.pdf

And in 2011, the japanese government increased it for infants, students, mature, unborn, to: 20 mSv/a


Source: http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/breaking-news/japanese-ire-over-radiation-limit-for-kids/story-e6frf7jx-1226061484710

20 mSv mean: below, but still high: 555,000 becquerel per m² contamination (from 1995 Belarus National Report):

17 milli Sievert per year mean: 16,000 – 32,000 additional cancer deaths AND 150,000 – 1,5 million deaths by genetic diseases: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/PP/app1.html by John W. Gofman, Ph.D., M.D and Arthur R. Tamplin, Ph.D. quote “If we use the most optimistic Russell mouse genetic data, and even if we give full credit for slow delivery of radiation, we reach the conclusion that 100,000 extra genetic deaths per year would occur for the allowable average exposure of 170 millirads to the population. This can hardly be construed as an “optimistic” outlook, or a “safe” dose of radiation.”



“…To provide an adequate safety standard the dose limit of 1 mSv/y have to be reduced to 0.02 mSv/y or 20 µSv/y.”Page 9: http://www.staff.uni-marburg.de/~kunih/all-doc/stoakuni.pdf by Dr. Horst Kuni, Nuclear Medicine, University Professor.

Professor Yuri Bandazhevsky, a pathologist, Rector of the Medical Institute of Gomel, on the ingestion of radio caesium includes – he said: “Clinical checks on children between 1996 and 1999 show that at levels greater than 50Bq/kg there are pathological changes in vital organs and systems – cardiovascular, nervous, endocrine, immune, reproductive, digestive excretory and eyes. Caesium concentrations in the placenta reveal a relationship with nervous system defects in the foetus. The health condition of the population is a disaster but being a physician myself I cannot accept it as hopeless. With all my faith in God and life I appeal to anyone who can influence it: do your best to improve the situation. There is nothing more precious on this planet than life. And we should do everything possible to protect it.” http://www.spokesmanbooks.com/Spokesman/PDF/91Gifford.pdf

Until 1990 ICRP said it is not necessary to evacuate people, as long as the radiation does not exceed 500 mSv.: http://books.google.de/books?id=Ber3ENERfGwC&pg=PA343&lpg=PA343&dq=ICRP+40++500mSv&source=bl&ots=IaOqT2MqK2&sig=l3l0MYGe_nKkaXxvFZxkkG8hP5M&hl=de&ei=gc81TpqyI4PfsgajxLG5Ag&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=8&ved=0CE0Q6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=ot%20exceed%20500%20mSv.%20The%20ICRP&f=false

WARNING TO ALL PREGNANT WOMEN: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/08/03/safe-radiation-levels-never-get-your-facts-here/

IAEA subsequently took its radiation protection recommendations directly from ICRP (rather than WHO), therefore persons from the Commission who also sit on UNSCEAR both make the rules and judge their adequacy: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/Chernobyl/CaUFtH.html

Clause 12 of the Executive conclusion of the Recommendation of the European Committee for radiation risks declares: “…Total maximal permitted dose from all human-caused sources should not exceed 0.1 mSv for population and 5 mSv for personnel”. This publication is declared by the European Committee for radiation risks as “regulating”. It is only common sense that we should follow the recommendations given in this publication by the scientists from Canada, Norway, Great Britain, Denmark, Switzerland, the USA, Ireland, Sweden, Germany, France, India, Belarus, Finland and Russia. page 16 http://independentwho.org/media/Documents_IW/Forum_Radioprotection_English_Abstracts_IW_2012.pdf

“European Parliament hears criticisms of radiation protection standards, but don’t publish findings” Brussels 1998: page 35 for example: Childhood leukemia caused by normal reactor operation: http://www.llrc.org/health/subtopic/stoaabstracts.pdf

with kind regards,

Jan Hemmer

Read Full Post »


On NRC Server:

From the 1970ies: Mrs. Mary Weik (New York) on Indian Point, Hudson River, Leukemia and Cancer – collected works: http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1002/ML100220378.pdf She was attacked by officials like AEC (NRC) that she was only a “housewife” and her works are worthless. NRC’s response: http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1002/ML100261297.pdf from the NRC server (full of docs): http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1002/

with kind regards,

Jan Hemmer


Read Full Post »


NRC “science”:

Former NRC chairman Schlesinger wanted to shoot radioactive waste into space: http://books.google.de/books?id=fmip1KhHnrUC&pg=PA475&lpg=PA475&dq=Schlesinger+AEC+space+radioactive+waste&source=bl&ots=lEbmQ8lYyg&sig=JHFMgVqTcx_DeSm3Tz6G1rJX5CY&hl=de&sa=X&ei=wB84T5GlOoSf0QWm4qinAg&ved=0CDoQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=Schlesinger%20rocket&f=false

No step further today.

with kind regards,

Jan Hemmer

Read Full Post »


offender found!

The atomic industry IS the military!

SOURCE: § 40.25 General license for use of certain industrial products or devices: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/part040/part040-0025.html

EFFECTS: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WgQ79-oDX2o and: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/dhap/dhap99f.html

800 tons of DU is the atomicity equivalent of 83,000 Nagasaki bombs. The U.S. has used more DU since 1991 than the atomicity equivalent of 400,000 Nagasaki bombs. Four nuclear wars indeed, and 10 times the amount of radiation released into the atmosphere from atmospheric testing! SOURCE: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/DU/KYagasakiOnDU.pdf

More on NRC: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/07/15/us-n-r-c-says-tritium-is-normal-reason-for-children-leukemia/


Read Full Post »


ONE radiograph during pregnancy: 20 % increase for cancer probability before the child is 10 years old. Two radiographs during pregnancy: 28 %. Three: 70 %. FOUR:…. 100 PERCENT. There is NO SAFE LEVEL OF RADIATION EXPOSURE: http://books.google.de/books?id=aAoAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA30&lpg=PA30&dq=cancer+stewart+xray+1970+radiographs&source=bl&ots=UGZYt0TZGo&sig=ENE9wYZjjNs3Rh2XyptdZwP3Ucw&hl=de&ei=7545Tu6iF8aAOsLrvbMG&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&sqi=2&ved=0CBsQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false

No One Escapes Harm: The Essential Story of In-Utero Irradiation http://ratical.org/radiation/CNR/No1Escapes.html

The X-rays and Health Project (XaHP): http://www.x-raysandhealth.org/

THE PETKAU EFFECT: http://www.nuclearreader.info/chapter3.html

PET / CT scanner. These are systems that simultaneously do (X-ray) computer tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) of a whole person. The PET is a nuclear medicine three-dimensional method in which positron emitters are used – mostly fluorine-18 – with a half-life of 1.8 hours (or full decay time of 18 hrs). For a single whole-body examination while the effective dose climbs to 10 millisieverts (mSv) for CT alone to 25 mSv. The organ doses are correspondingly: bone marrow 29 mSv, 27 mSv lung, ovary 33 mSv, 36 mSv intestine, stomach 29 mSv. For comparison, the threshold for the population at a nuclear power plant is 0.3 mSv (effective) per year for occupationally Exposed 20 mSv per year: http://www.strahlentelex.de/MedizinischeStrahlenbelastung.htm

radioactive iron Fe-59 given to 820 pregnant women (between 10th and 35th pregnancy week). The women knew nothing about it. Result: High malignancy rates in offspring: Acute lymphatic leukemia, synovial sarcoma, lymphosarcoma, primary liver carcinoma. http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/radiation/dir/mstreet/commeet/pm04/pl4brf/pl4brd.txt

BEIR? ICRP? IAEA? SAFE LEVELS? Here are your facts, by a former NRC scientists and whistleblower: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/GreenDereg.html

K.Z. Morgan (former ICRP chairman) “there is no dose of radiatoon so low that the risk of malignancy is zero” QUOTE page 30, right, although the ICRP claimed the opposite until 1960http://books.google.de/books?id=aAoAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA30&lpg=PA30&dq=cancer+and+low+level+ionizing+radiation+morgan+k.z.&source=bl&ots=UGZYt-R5El&sig=u136wezO8Tvy5YZE-bfJhYjB-AQ&hl=de&ei=GHM5TtXrOoTKswbx4vUY&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCAQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=there%20is%20no%20dose%20of%20radiatoon%20so%20low%20that%20the%20risk%20of%20malignancy%20is%20zero&f=false

Karl Morgan “There is no safe level of exposure and there is no dose of radiation so low that the risk of a malignancy is zero”:  http://books.google.de/books?id=9-8EkIhxeK0C&pg=PA18&lpg=PA18&dq=%E2%80%9CThere+is+no+safe+level+of+exposure+and+there+is+no+dose+of+radiation+so+low+that+the+risk+of+a+malignancy+is+zero%E2%80%9D&source=bl&ots=GZXG5ZVK0i&sig=vVvf-pFUOPAPISPaBR5IWmVzlV8&sa=X&ei=AnUyUIq4L6Ss0QWtzoDgDA&ved=0CBQQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%E2%80%9CThere%20is%20no%20safe%20level%20of%20exposure%20and%20there%20is%20no%20dose%20of%20radiation%20so%20low%20that%20the%20risk%20of%20a%20malignancy%20is%20zero%E2%80%9D&f=false

more: http://books.google.de/books?id=QunaUpeENl4C&printsec=frontcover&hl=de&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

“As Alice Stewart mentioned in her talk, there are two categories of human illness that everyone agrees can be caused by exposure to atomic radiation even at very low levels. They are (1) cancers of all kinds, and also (2) genetic mutations — which can be caused right down to the lowest levels of radiation exposure. Most scientists believe that these harmful effects are linearly related to the dose, so that if the dose is doubled, the number of cancers and genetic defects will also be doubled, and if the dose is cut in half, only half as many cancers and genetic defects will be seen. It is important to realize that if a damaging dose is spread out among a very large population, so that each individual receives only a very small portion of the total dose, the number of cancers and genetic defects is in no way diminished. Thus, in the case of radioactive pollution, dilution is no solution at all.” http://www.ratical.org/radiation/WorldUraniumHearing/AliceStewart.html#MUTATE

“According to the ICRP in 1991, just 5 mSv to the testes could cause damage to offspring – yet this dose was permitted yearly to members of the public, and ten times more was permitted to nuclear workers, in all countries prior to 1990. It continues today to be permitted yearly for nuclear workers in most countries.” http://iicph.org/victims_of_the_nuclear_age

ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection) protects atomic industry NOT human health: Until 1990 ICRP said it is not necessary to evacuate people, as long as the radiation does not exceed 500 mSv. Then they lowered it from 100 mSv to 20 milli sievert (2000 percent increase for children) which Japan implemented. Which is an equivalent of 50 mammograms: http://books.google.de/books?id=Ber3ENERfGwC&pg=PA343&lpg=PA343&dq=ICRP+40++500mSv&source=bl&ots=IaOqT2MqK2&sig=l3l0MYGe_nKkaXxvFZxkkG8hP5M&hl=de&ei=gc81TpqyI4PfsgajxLG5Ag&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=8&ved=0CE0Q6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=ot%20exceed%20500%20mSv.%20The%20ICRP&f=false

NOW we know, there is only one tolerance limit: ZERO – the Reference Embryo: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/03/11/atomic-alert-in-japan/

ICRP versus ECRR: http://www.euradcom.org/2009/lesvostranscript.htm

and: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/07/15/less-girls-are-born-because-of-nuclear-power-global-population-growth-control/

The excess cancer risk from obstetric X-ray examination was directly related to the fetal dose: http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2870%2991782-4/abstract

5 mGy – 50 mGy = 5000% Leukemia increase for children: http://cel.webofknowledge.com/InboundService.do?SID=Q2kiGlBbfFgNPfKfkLo&product=CEL&UT=A1972N025000001&SrcApp=CR&Init=Yes&action=retrieve&customersID=Highwire&Func=Frame&SrcAuth=Highwire&IsProductCode=Yes&mode=FullRecord

The dosage given for diagnostic radiography is carciogenic at any rate for the foetus: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2009217/?page=9



Read Full Post »

Older Posts »


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 71 other followers