Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘2012’

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

WHO Report on Fukushima a Travesty: http://www.i-sis.org.uk/WHO_Report_on_Fukushima_a_Travesty.php

Action & Text by independentwho.org

“For five and a half years we have maintained a daily presence (the Hippocratic Vigil) outside the headquarters of the WHO in Geneva. The aim of the vigil is to denounce the lies and cover-up of this international organisation on the subject of the health consequences of radioactive pollution…”

ENGLISH: http://independentwho.org/en/2012/11/15/vigil-ministry-in-paris/

JAPANESE: http://independentwho.org/jp/2012/11/10/%E3%83%91%E3%83%AA%E5%8E%9A%E7%94%9F%E7%9C%81%E5%89%8D%E3%83%B4%E3%82%A3%E3%82%B8%E3%83%BC%EF%BC%88%E8%A6%8B%E5%BC%B5%E7%95%AA%EF%BC%89/

FRENCH: http://independentwho.org/fr/2012/11/09/vigie-ministere-sante-paris/

This report bears all the hallmarks of WHO’s subservience to the IAEA. It was not written by WHO personnel but by an International Expert Panel convened by the WHO. http://independentwho.org/en/2012/12/08/who-report-a-travesty/

More: Margaret Chan VERSUS World Health Organisation: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/05/27/margaret-chan-versus-world-health-organisation/

WHO downplayed health effects of nuclear crisis on Fukushima residents – The Japan Times Online Dec 6th 2012:

>>> http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/nn20121216a4.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+japantimes+%28The+Japan+Times%3A+All+Stories%29

> “it is recognized by the World Health Organization that the International Atomic Energy Agency has the primary responsibility for encouraging, assisting and coordinating research and development and practical application of atomic energy for peaceful uses throughout the world without prejudice to the right of the World Health Organization to concern itself with promoting, developing, assisting and coordinating international health work, including research, in all its aspects.http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/Others/inf20.shtml#note_c

> Radiation Is Always Dangerous, Says World Health Organization Director-General:  http://concernforhealth.org/radiation-is-always-dangerous-says-world-health-organization-director-general/

CHERNOBYL – the greast Cover Up: http://mondediplo.com/2008/04/14who

“World Health Organisation experts played a role of advocates of the Soviet authorities which tried to play down by any means the scale of the Chernobyl accident and its radiological consequences”: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/1998/kr-21/Malko96-1.html

“experts of IAEA neglected protests of Belarussian and Ukrainian scientists insisting serious increase of child thyroid diseases around Chernobyl against the conclusion of the International Chernobyl Project that there was no health effect there. Five years later the same experts of IAEA had to recognize ′myth′ of thyroid diseases to be facts…” http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Imanaka1.pdf

> “Up to 1,300 million people have been killed, maimed or diseased by nuclear power since its inception. The industry’s figures massively underestimate the real cost of nuclear power, in an attempt to hide its victims from the world.” http://exacteditions.theecologist.org/read/ecologist/vol-29-no-7-november-1999-5368/29/2/

> “We are constantly being told about a ‘permissible amount of radiation.’ Who permitted it? Who has any right to permit it?” Albert Schweitzer
http://icanw.org/1957

“The threshold level of 20 mSv/year is in contrast to the statutory legal limit imposed by the 1972 industrial safety regulation for the nuclear industry. For workers at a nuclear power plant, the maximum limit of exposure (in the controlled area) prescribed by law is 20 mSv/year (not exceeding 50 mSv/year) and a cumulative dose of 100 mSv in five years. The law prohibits the entry of ordinary citizens into the controlled area with radiation dose of 1.3 mSv/quarter and further prohibits workers to eat, drink or sleep in that area. It also prohibits pregnant women to be exposed to radiation dose in a controlled area of over 2mSv/year.

I would like to recall that in Chernobyl the threshold limit for obligatory resettlement was 5 mSv/year or above, apart from soil contamination levels. There are also a significant number of epidemiological studies, which indicate that cancer and other diseases could occur in low dose radiation below 100 mSv/year. According to these studies, there is no low threshold limit for the occurrence of diseases.” http://independentwho.org/en/2012/11/29/anand-grover-fukushima/

Brilliant Article about IAEA, WHO, Fukushima by Agnès Sinai in the latest Le Monde Diplomatique – german translation: http://www.taz.de/!107449/

Jan Hemmer

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

My footage from Correction of History: Forum on Radioprotection May 12 – 13 Geneva by independent WHO.org

Communication by : Alexei Nesterenko (Belarus) Director BELRAD care of children affected by ionizing radiation, coauthor of Chernobyl Consequences
of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment published by the New York Academy of Sciences: http://www.strahlentelex.de/Yablokov%20Chernobyl%20book.pdf

Title: Implementation of radioprotection for populations at local level. Radioecological atlas: Human beings and radiation.

MORE CHILDERN RADIATION MAPS: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/children-radiation-maps-2/

With more than 20 years experience, we can sum up what we have learnt about protecting local populations from radiation: children living in highly contaminated areas, who are eating food that is
highly contaminated by radionuclides, need constant radioprotection. The work that has been done by the Belrad Institute in the Narovlya district of the Gomel region, provides a good example of this.
The children received 45 cycles of radioprotection treatment consisting of 45 pectin cures and 810 WBC measurements (Whole Body Count measured with a radiospectrometer before and after the intake of pectin preparation).

BELRAD Whole Body Counter (Children and Cesium 137) summary: http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/paper2%20V.Nesterenko.ppt PowerPoint File

After each measurement, staff from the Belrad Institute for Radiation Safety held meetings with parents and teachers to examine the results. The use of milk separators which are able to reduce radioactivity in milk 68 fold.

The WBC measurements of children in those families demonstrated that levels of accumulation were decreased 3 to 4 fold.

Practical education is necessary in order to develop cooking skills and radiological knowledge.

The children should be sent for recuperation in uncontaminated regions as often as twice a year, and the entire programme of radiological protection should be made available to them.

The large scope of the work required the collation and evaluation of all the data received, which was then combined to produce a document called “A Radioecological Atlas: Man and Radiation”.

Later on the atlas was extended to include the results of measurements taken between 2008 and 2011. On the basis of these measurements, it was possible to create maps of Cs137 radionuclide contamination of children in fifteen districts: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/children-radiation-maps-2/

The projects “ATLAS2” and “Prompt Radiological Assistance for the Children of the Chernobyl Zone of Belarus” were a logical continuation of the original ATLAS project. The purpose was to update the Radioecological
atlas with the new data, and provide comprehensive and prompt assistance in those settlements where an adverse radiological situation was discovered in the course of radiation monitoring. It should also be mentioned that the ATLAS was subsequently extended by including the data received as a result of activities carried out as part of other projects and work carried out by the BELRAD Institute. Today the ATLAS presents a systematic analysis of the results of more than 300, 000 measurements.
We are well aware that our work is just a small part of what needs to be done, and that positive results can only be achieved by using a whole series of protective measures. These include: monitoring of radiation in the environment, food, and population; medical examinations; administrative measures; rehabilitation of contaminated areas; the application of modern methods in agriculture and forestry; education; the use of radioprotectors (adsorbants) for the quick elimination of radionuclides from the bodies of people, dairy and beef cattle and so on.

Cesium 137, food, children,,apple pectin: http://radionucleide.free.fr/Stresseurs/smw-Galina_Bandazhevskaya.pdf

Cesium 137 and Children: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/05/13/%E3%83%A6%E3%83%BC%E3%83%AA%E3%83%BC%E3%83%BB%E3%83%90%E3%83%B3%E3%83%80%E3%82%B8%E3%82%A7%E3%83%95%E3%82%B9%E3%82%AD%E3%83%BC-cesium-137-and-children-may-12th-2012/

Communication by: Vladimir Babenko (Belarus), Deputy Director BELRAD (author of a manual on radioprotection)

In the last few years we have often heard the opinion that the interest in Chernobyl is diminishing. In 2011 this interest like the interest in the problems of nuclear energy increased unusually. To my mind there are several reasons for this. Twenty five years after the Chernobyl accident, the accident at the Fukushima nuclear power plant in Japan and rethinking about the problems of nuclear energy. Now it is time to solve the problem of the future prospects of nuclear power plants.

Twenty five years is a period allowing the following conclusions: what have we learned during this time, what moral have people drawn from the Chernobyl accident? To my mind the first conclusion is disappointing. The Chernobyl accident demonstrated nothing to mankind. Chernobyl and Fukushima – the same problems, the same mistakes. Once it seemed that the main reason for such difficult consequences was the political regime existing in the USSR. Japan: another political regime, another natural environment, another culture and traditions. But the mistakes are the same. The main mistake is an attempt to hide the information about the real scale of the radiation accident, to minimize its consequences and to distort the real state of things.

After the accident at the Fukushima power plant it was clear that the population of Japan had not enough knowledge about radiation, no documents, no instructions regulating people’s behavior in case of a radiation accident, no literature and reference materials that could help to clarify the situation and to take simple steps for radioprotection. That is why the Japanese show interest in the Belarusian experience in minimization of the consequences of the Chernobyl accident. From here there appeared the interest in the book “How to Protect Yourself and Your Child from Radiation” that was translated into Japanese and published in Japan.
There exist problems resulting from the Chernobyl accident in our country and they will exist in our country for a long time. The people living in the districts contaminated by Chernobyl radionuclides
should constantly learn how to protect themselves from the radiation impact, should learn to live under conditions of radioactive contamination of the territory and to help themselves and their relatives to minimize the Chernobyl impact.

The necessity to set in place permanent radiation monitoring of people and the annual dose of 0.1 mSv serve as a starting point for undertaking radiation protection measures. Clause 12 of the Executive conclusion of the Recommendation of the European Committee for radiation risks declares: “…Total maximal permitted dose from all humancaused sources should not exceed 0.1 mSv for population and 5 mSv for personnel”. This publication is declared by the European Committee for radiation risks as “regulating”. It is only common sense that we should follow the recommendations given in this publication by the scientists from Canada, Norway, Great Britain, Denmark, Switzerland, the USA, Ireland, Sweden, Germany, France, India, Belarus, Finland and Russia.

“Our experience shows that the recovery of the children in the clean regions doubled parallell with taking Pectin: The cleaning effectiveness of the child’s body by the radionuclides.” http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/Belrad%20Report%2012.pdf ALSO: CLEAN FOOD ALL THE TIME!

Belarusian Chernobyl Children WHOLE BODY COUNTER Experience & FOOD Measurements & Radionuclides. “COMPARISON OF THE EFFICIENCY OF THE RECUPERATION OF CHILDREN OF THE CHERNOBYL DISTRICTS OF BELARUS IN THE NATIONAL SANATORIA AND ABROAD” http://www.physiciansofchernobyl.org.ua/eng/Docs/Nesterenko_and_%20all_report.pdf

Me and Mr. Babenko in Minsk:

MORE OF BELRAD: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/04/25/26-chernobyl-years-since-1986/

Jan Hemmer

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

ignored by IAEA, WHO, USCEAR, BEIR, ICRP

Quote: “The collapse of the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant caused a massive release of radioactive materials to the environment. A prompt and reliable system for evaluating the biological impacts of this accident on animals has not been available. Here we show that the accident caused physiological and genetic damage to the pale grass blue Zizeeria maha, a common lycaenid butterfly in Japan. We collected the first-voltine adults in the Fukushima area in May 2011, some of which showed relatively mild abnormalities. The F1 offspring from the first-voltine females showed more severe abnormalities, which were inherited by the F2 generation. Adult butterflies collected in September 2011 showed more severe abnormalities than those collected in May. ***Similar abnormalities were experimentally reproduced in individuals from a non-contaminated area by external and internal low-dose exposures.**

“We conclude that artificial radionuclides from the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant caused physiological and genetic damage to this species.
http://www.nature.com/srep/2012/120809/srep00570/full/srep00570.html

TO ALL: The Butterflies of Fukushima are known since 1927! One of the best hidden secrets of the Atomic Military Industrial Complex.

EVIDENCE: Herman J Mueller discovered in 1927 (!) the following: ARTIFICIAL TRANSMUTATION OF THE GENE by radiation

http://www.esp.org/foundations/genetics/classical/holdings/m/hjm-1927a.pdf

He used X-Rays on fruit fly Drosophila! 1927!

Emmy Stein generated 1921 with Radium hereditary carcinomas in Antirrhinum plants: http://books.google.de/books?id=gPrtE4K0WC8C&pg=PA143&lpg=PA143&dq=Antirrhinum+radium+Emmy+Stein+1922&source=bl&ots=8EDd9LgkVF&sig=SqeLMTtx98h7aD5LLc_qAtJN3nY&hl=en#v=onepage&q=Antirrhinum%20radium%20Emmy%20Stein%201922&f=false

If Fukushima’s and Chernobyl’s radionuclides mimic X-rays and their mutagenic effect, then this is transferable to the effect of X-rays / Fukushima on the human fetus:

http://www.llrc.org/wobblyscience/wobblysciencepage.htm

ONE radiograph during pregnancy: 20 % increase for cancer probability before the child is 10 years old. Two radiographs during pregnancy: 28 %. Three: 70 %. FOUR:…. 100 PERCENT. There is NO SAFE LEVEL OF RADIATION EXPOSURE: http://books.google.de/books?id=aAoAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA30&lpg=PA30&dq=cancer+stewart+xray+1970+radiographs&source=bl&ots=UGZYt0TZGo&sig=ENE9wYZjjNs3Rh2XyptdZwP3Ucw&hl=de&ei=7545Tu6iF8aAOsLrvbMG&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&sqi=2&ved=0CBsQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false from: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/08/03/safe-radiation-levels-never-get-your-facts-here/

ICRP President “Karl Morgan was a friend of Hermann Müller and he remembers the geneticist’s warning about undermining the health of a nation and its children”: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/NRBE/NRBE14.html

Karl Morgan “There is no safe level of exposure and there is no dose of radiation so low that the risk of a malignancy is zero”:  http://books.google.de/books?id=9-8EkIhxeK0C&pg=PA18&lpg=PA18&dq=%E2%80%9CThere+is+no+safe+level+of+exposure+and+there+is+no+dose+of+radiation+so+low+that+the+risk+of+a+malignancy+is+zero%E2%80%9D&source=bl&ots=GZXG5ZVK0i&sig=vVvf-pFUOPAPISPaBR5IWmVzlV8&sa=X&ei=AnUyUIq4L6Ss0QWtzoDgDA&ved=0CBQQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%E2%80%9CThere%20is%20no%20safe%20level%20of%20exposure%20and%20there%20is%20no%20dose%20of%20radiation%20so%20low%20that%20the%20risk%20of%20a%20malignancy%20is%20zero%E2%80%9D&f=false

http://www.nuclearreader.info/chapter3.html

Butterflies of Fukushima! 2011!

Herman J Mueller got the The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1946 for THIS!

http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/1946/muller-bio.html

WE KNOW IT SINCE 1927!

An he believed in EUGENICS!: http://www.genomenewsnetwork.org/resources/timeline/1927_Muller.php

Chernobyl “compressed several thousand years of evolution into a decade” – New York Times 1996 http://www.nytimes.com/1996/05/07/science/chernobyl-s-voles-live-but-mutations-surge.html

X-Rays are also used on larger animals, with horrific effects: “The Monster Maker” http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,862623,00.html

Irradiated Fruit Fly (the antenna grows from the eye):

The nuclear lessons of Chernobyl (french) by Roger Nymo: http://sanurezo.org/spip.php?article85
The birth numbers do not only decrease because people don’t want children… they can’t get as much healthy children as in the past. Mutation rate of insects rised from 1% to 30%: http://radionucleide.free.fr/Stresseurs/fulltext_punaise.pdf
LESS GIRLS: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/07/15/less-girls-are-born-because-of-nuclear-power-global-population-growth-control/
Cancer = Mutation: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/06/17/nuclear-cancer-industry/
Insects and their fast mutagenic “reaction” on low radiation are some kind of early warning system for us humans: Irradiated Insects in Japan: http://www.freeml.com/bl/8694840/25149/
normal insects soon only in the laboratory: http://www.wissenskunst.ch/en/tschernobyl.htm
Reduced abundance of insects and spiders linked to radiation at Chernobyl: http://cricket.biol.sc.edu/chernobyl/papers/moller-mousseau-biol-letters-09.pdf
Teratological effects and mutations through radiation – ignored by IAEA, OECD, ICRP, UNSCEAR, SCIENCE – proven by Étienne Wolff in the 1930ies: http://books.google.com/books/about/Th%C3%A8ses_pr%C3%A9sent%C3%A9es_%C3%A0_la_Facult%C3%A9_des.html?id=MQvwcQAACAAJ
adsorbed Strontium 90 remains in weakly bound outer sphere surface complexes even after incubation for one year. This has clear implications with respect to scenarios where future sea level rise may result in seawater inund0ation of coastalsites.This would result in increased ionic strength in groundwaters, and, therefore, remobilisation of adsorbed Strontium 90 by cation exchange.” http://leeds.academia.edu/IBurke/Papers/1664859/Effect_of_groundwater_pH_and_ionic_strength_on_strontium_sorption_in_aquifer_sediments_Implications_for_90Sr_mobility_at_contaminated_nuclear_sites 
Acantharia (Plankton) has a Strontium Skeleton: http://tolweb.org/Acantharia/2385 takes in Radio-Strontium – just as us. But: PLankton is much lower in the Food Chain. And the food chains are much longer there than on land. This means that contamination in fish at the end of the food chain is much higher than the water in which they swim.
http://www.osti.gov/bridge/purl.cover.jsp?purl=%2F5557734-tlwxvK%2F

Plankton takes in 200,000th of a radioactive substance: http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/FUKUSHIMA-SEA-BECQUEREL.jpg“If the cesium in the fresh water happens to be radioactive cesium-137, from a nuclear reactor or other source, then the fish will contain 1000 times more cesium-137 than the fresh water itself, on a weight-for-weight basis.” Source: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/PP/chp2.htmlCesium 137 activity is 200,000 times higher back waters (!) than before Chernobyl: https://tekknorg.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/08.jpg

with kind regards,
Jan Hemmer

Read Full Post »