Archive for the ‘WMD’ Category

The IEA wants 1,300 new atomic power plants to be build till 2050. They made this public in Tokio. They want 32 new atomic power plants per Year.

HERE is their scenario (.pdf file)

The IAEA which sells pro-atomic ideology around the globe and denies any link between desease / death and high or low radiation for sure supports the opinion of the IEA.

A scenario like this would have drastic changes in energy costs – such as rising Uranium prices. From the 60 year range of Uranium we have today, with 1,300 additional atomic reactors worldwide, the Uranium range would drop to 3 years and the prices will explode more than oil does today (US $ 140 / barrel).

2000,000,000  EUROs (as for the new reactor in Finland – funded by the Bavarian Bank) per atomic power plant makes 1,300 times 2,000,000,000 EUROs. Unimaginable costs – plus mortgage crisis – plus (!) rising Uranium / shipping / security prices – plus new energy wars.

IEA and IAEA indirectly support worlds insecurity in my opion.

Every non-objective Organisation like the IEA or the IAEA which reclaims more atomic reactors (1,300 !) mustn’t wonder when countries like Iran or North-Korea want to build new atomic reactors.

Also a peaceful atomic power plant creates weapon ready Plutonium.

Don’t let IEA and IAEA destroy your money.

This is an energy-politcal Rampage!

further information HERE



Read Full Post »

Given the fact of rising oil prices, Presidential Candidate Senator McCain wants to build 45 new atomic power plants. During his Presidential race, President Bush also announced that he wants new atomic power plants to be build. Guess what? Nothing happened during his 8 years. And nothing will happen during the McCain or Obama Presidency. Why?
Simply because atomic reactors are too expensive. For example the new reactor in Finland – which is funded by the Bavarian Bank – with 2,000,000,000 EUROs. That’s 45 times 2,000,000,000 EUROs according to McCain’s plans. And this is what McCain wants, this is what the IAEA wants. They want to destroy money, it seems.

Atomic reactors never never amortize. Really, never. They become more and more expensive instead. Why?

If you build one reactor, more Uranium is needed. Uranium has a worldwide range of 60 years – that’s the way Oil goes: Up the price. So, if you build more reactors, you need more Uranium. Uranium will be more expensive and new energy wars will be on the horizon. More and more costs. As said, this hopefully will never happen.

McCain also said, his ultimate goal would be: 100 new atomic reactors.

Since the 1970ies not a single reactor was build in the U.S.



Read Full Post »

According to an internal study of the U.S. Air Force most of the U.S. atomic weapons storage places in Europe are not conform with the minimal security standards of the Pentagon. Source: Federation of American Scientists [FAS]

The FAS estimates that 200 – 350 atomic weapons are stored in Europe. For example in Germany: Bundeswehr-Fliegerhorst Büchel / Eifel [map] On top of this there are other storage places Great Britain, Italy, Turkey and the Netherlands. The U.S. Military plans to reduces these places but not the atomc weapons.

The problems are: The security systems, fences, and that 9 month conscripts were used to ensure that the places are safe against thievery.

The study was only made public (due FAS), because the U.S. Air Force itself has big security problems:

U.S. Air Force Chiefs fired because letting fly six atomic weapons over the U.S.



Read Full Post »

On Jun 7th 2008, Gen. T. Michael Moseley and Secretary Michael W. Wynne were fired. Source


U.S. Warheads over (!) the U.S.


Read Full Post »

Denver USA. On Tuesday, Republican Presidental Candidate McCain spoke out for worldwide cut of atomic weapons, also in the U.S. Also with China negotiations should be made. He hopes that U.S. atomic weapons can be cut as soon as possible.  He also pleads for an offensive to stop circulation of atomic weapons. Source

How about cutting the atomic weapons in Germany first


Read Full Post »

Watch them HERE (gruesome photos):

Original SOURCE and additional info.

More than 150,000 people died after explosion, more than 100,000 after. Today there are still people suffering, because radiation has long time effects on health and genotype. IAEA denies this, although it is scientific proven (HERE), published in a paper 2 years after the atomic bomb exploded over Hiroshioma. The Americans dropped an atomic bomb in 1945 over Hiroshima and the 2nd one over Nagasaki, to end WWII. What are the atomic plans of the U.S. today – see HERE – nuking again?



Read Full Post »

There are people who cannot find the information about the danger of atomic power and atomic bombs, neither on Wikipedia nor on Youtube. What they find is what School says. Here is a list.

Excerpts of the papers mentioned in the list can be found inside the book “Permanent peoples tribunal – Chernobyl” 1996, by the IPPNW

Buy it here: Global Education Associates, 475 Riverside Drive Suite 1848, New York, NY 10 1115, Tel. + 1212 870 3290 / UK: Low Level Radiation Campaign, Ammondale, Spa Rd. Llandrindod Wells, Powys LD1 5EY, U.K., Tel. + 44 1597 824 771. Or in Germany: Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft Den Kindern von Tschernobyl in Deutschland e.V. ESG-Haus, Breul 43, 48143 – Münster (Pfr. Burkhard Homeyer). Tel. + 49 2501 274 17.

Ask me for more Adresses. Some papers have never been translated, some are very hard to find – and even forbidden, especially in Belarus, where you can lose your job, when making links between illness and Radiation (if you’re a Belarussian Doctor). Many information from these papers, such as becoming ill by low radiation are denied by IAEA nerds.

Well, let’s go:

– EU – IAEA -WHO, Documentation for the international Conference “One Decade After Chernobyl: Summing up the Consequences of the Accident” (Vienna, 8. – 12. April 1996).

One Decade after Chernobyl: Environmental Impact and Prospects For the Future, IAEA Conference 8 – 12 March 1996, Vienna, Background papers of the Sessions 5, 7, 8, Book of Extended Synopses, Statements of the President of the Republic of Belarus and of the Prime Minister of Ukraine, Closing Session: Keynote closing remarks and keynote statements presenting the final conclusions and recommendations of the IAEA Conference, Friday 12 April 1996, 12.30 hr

– International Congress “The World After Chernobyl”, Main-Scientific Reports, Minsk, March 1996.

Declaration of Helsinki about the Action for Environment and Health in Europe, 1994.

– WHO, International Program about the health consequences from the Chernobyl accident – IPHECA Pilotproject and related national programs, summary report, 1995.

UNSCEAR, Effects of Radiation on Environment, 17.2. 1995.

NEA-OECD, Chernobyl: Ten Years after. Radiological and health consequences. A assessment of the NEA committee for radiation protection and peoples health, November 1995.

– Baker R.J., Ronald A., Van Den Busshe R.A., Wright A.J., Wiggins L.E., Hamilton M.J., Reat E.P., Smith M.H. Lomakin M.D. & Chesser R.K.: High Levels of genetic change in rodents of Chernobyl, Nature, 25 April 1996, Vol. 380, pp. 707 – 708.

– Bandahevsky Yu.I. and Lelevich V.V.: Clinical and experimental aspects of the effect of incorporated radionucleides upon the organism, Gomel, State Medical Institute, Belorussian Engineering Academy. Monography of the Ministery of Health of the Republic of Belarus, pp. 128. 1995.

– Burlakova E.B.: Low intensity radiation: radiological aspects. Radiation Protection Dosimetry Vol. 62, No 1/2 pp. 13 – 18 1995, Nuclear Technology Publishing.

Into the Future without Atomic energy. Pullout in 10 years – Win for Environment and Working places. CAN (Anti-Atomic coalition, Sihlquai 67, 8005 – Zurich), December 1995.

– Drobyschewskaja I.M., Kryssenko N.A., Shakov I.G., Steshko W.A. & Okeanov A.E.: Health condition of the people, who are living in the Chernobyl contamined areas of Belarus. 1996, Minsk. The most important papers, Internat. Congress “The World after Chernobyl”, pp. 91 – 103.

– Dubrova Y.E., Nesterov V.N. , Krouchinsky N.G., Ostapenko V. A. Neumann R., Neil D.L. & Jeffreys A.J.: Human minisatellite mutation rate after the Chernobyl accident, Nature, 25 April 1996, Vol. 380 p 683 – 686.

– Editorial: Children become the first vicitims of fallout. Science: vol. 272, 19 April 1996 pp. 357 à 360.

– Fernex M.: Les conférences du 10e anniversaire de la catastrophe de Tchernobyl et le congrès de L’Agence Internationale pour L’Energie Atomique (AIEA). Symposium “Tschernobyl Projekte 1996”, publié par L’Institut pour Social et préventif médicine de Université Bern, Suisse, P. Bleuer ed. 11 mai 1996, pp. 1-8.

– Gadekar S.: Conclusion of the health survey of villages near Rawatbhata. CANE 767, 36 Cross, 4th Block Jayanager Bangalore 560 041. April / May 1993 Anumkti Vol. 6 No 5, pp. 1 – 32.

– Goncharova R.I. & Ryabokon N.I.: Proceedings: Belarus-Japan-Symposium “Acute and late Consequences of Nuclear Catastrophes: Hiroshima-Nagasaki and Chernobyl” Oct. 3 – 5, 1994. Belarus Academy of Sciences, Minsk.

– Goncharova R.I. & Ryabokon N.I.: Dynamics of gamma-emitter content level in many generations of wild rodents in contaminated areas of Belarus. 2nd Intern. 25 – 26 October 1994, Conf. “Radiobiological Consequences of Nuclear Accidents.”

– Goncharova R.I. & Slukvin A.M.: Study on mutation and modification variability in young fishes of Cyprinus carpio from regions contaminated by the Chernobyl radioactive fallout. 27 – 28 October 1994, Russia-Norvegian Satellite Symposium on Nuclear Accidents, Radioecology and Health. Abstract Part 1, Moscow, 1994

Second Sources HERE

More coming soon!



Read Full Post »

Older Posts »