Archive for January, 2014



The official and PUBLIC belarusian radiation map shows CLEAN areas: MOSTLY Belarus appears to be clean: And this is a LIE! An official lie!



Plutonium (Pu-239), that triggers in micrograms cancer, is produced in each reactor in the fission of uranium, about 250kg per year and reactor.
Radiogases which reactors emit do not disappear.
Instead they become more deadly.
Krypton 89 stays 18,4 seconds (full decay time) and becomes Strontium 89, which stays 500 days.
Krypton 90 stays 323 seconds and delievers Strontium 90 (288 years) via Rubidium 90 (1,580 seconds).
Xenon 137 stays 384 minutes and decays into Cesium 137 (300 years) which becomes stable Barium 137.
Plutonium 241 stays 147 years, becomes Americium 241 which stays 4,000 years and then becomes Neptunium 237, which stays 22 million years.

HALF-LIFE – an euphemistic term, used by the nuclear industry, to downplay and conceal.

European Continent is COMPLETELY irradiated: http://www.unscear.org/docs/JfigXI.pdf Cesium 137: Full Decay Time is 10 human generatons = 300 years.

Radionuclides decay more slowly with time.

Half life time means that only half of the radiation has disappeared. You have to multiply the half life time by ten in order to know approximately, when it disappeared from the environment. In the case of Strontium and Cesium that would be 300 years.


432352_234914423305891_62798769_ncomparsion by 希望の大輪



Every Oblast (federal state) of Belarus HERE: (from the textbook, and not real measurements): http://www.rbic.by/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=256&Itemid=86

The official belarusian radiation maps from the Radiation Atlas of the Government (NOT PUBLIC) show the change over the decades (1986 – 2046):And there is NEVER a CLEAN area. I had the chance to look into the Radiation Atlas, when our NGO visited the  Kosmo Aero Geology Institute of Belarus (http://www.kosmoaerogeology.by)

helios18 helios19

“Taking into account increased sensitivity of cells of different organs and tissues of animals from chronically irradiated populations to induction of all types of mutations – genic, genomic (polyploid cells) and structural (chromosome aberrations), it is necessary to emphasise that the areas with a wide range of radiocontamination density due to the Chernobyl fallout (8-2351 kBq/m² in our tests) are zones with high genetic risk for animals and man.” http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Goncharova.pdf

the blast / federal state BREST in 1996: (Belarus) / Border to Poland – distance to Chernobyl: 460 km


then, BREST in 2006:


and BREST in 2026:


The penetration of radionuclides into deeper soil layers: The water solubility of these isotopes is essential. There exists the following sequence: Strontium> Cesium> Tungsten> Yttrium> Cerium> Zircon. http://www.landesmuseum.at/pdf_frei_remote/PHY_37_1_0085-0092.pdf. Most of these radionuclides remain a long time on the upper 1-2 centimeters, after 5 years 60 – 85% of them are decreased in 3 – 5 cm depth. http://www.dissercat.com/content/sistema-zashchitnykh-meropriyatii-i-tekhnologicheskie-priemy-vedeniya-rastenievodstva-na-sel

And now one of the most irradiated oblasts / federal states of Belarus: GOMEL, in 1986 – distance to Chernobyl: 138 km


Ten years later, GOMEL 1996:


GOMEL, 2006:


10 years later: GOMEL, 2016:


“Germline mutation at human minisatellite loci has been studied among children born in heavily polluted areas of the Mogilev district of Belarus after the Chernobyl accident and in a control population. The frequency of mutation was found to be twice as high in the exposed families as in the control group. Mutation rate in the Mogilev families was correlated with the level of caesium-137 surface contamination, consistent with radiation induction of germline mutation.” http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8614461

And this is Minsk – the capital, 2,000,000 people: According to the PUBLIC OFFICIAL MAP: CLEAN. Already in 1986. But: IRRADIATED in 2046 and 1986!

helios10 helios09

The development of Strontium 90:


Cesium 137:



helios16 helios20

and in Forests of Belarus:

helios07 helios08 helios21helios06

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14


“not until 2016, at the earliest, will we know the full number of those likely to develop serious medical conditions.” former Secretary-General Kofi Annan http://www.un.org/ha/chernobyl/docs/sgsm7778.htm

What do these Becquerel and Curie mean? ONE EXAMPLE:

555,000 to 1,48 million becquerel per m² mean 50 – 60 mSv a year! EXTERNAL! Internal not even counted in: https://tekknorg.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/16.jpg “For children of the Stolinsk District, Brest Province, who were radiated in utero from ambient Cs-137 levels up to 15 Ci/km2, morbidity was significantly higher for the primary classes of illnesses 10 years later. Disease diagnoses were manifest at ages 6 to 7 years” Page 63: http://www.strahlentelex.de/Yablokov%20Chernobyl%20book.pdf -> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10576018

MORE INSIGHT: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/04/21/good-will-is-irradiated/

AND: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/children-radiation-maps-2/

Read Full Post »



The funeral of the founder of the fund “For The Children of Chernobyl” Belarus – Prof. Dr. Gennady Grushevoy. Your work, friend, will never rest in peace. Your Work, philosophy, help has germinated.

Today died the Founder of the Fund “For the Children of Chernobyl” Belarus. Prof. Dr. Gennady Grushevoy.
Thanks to you, the world learned about Chernobyl.
Thanks to you, many lives could be saved.
Thanks to you, an ethical “chain reaction” arose.
Of help, of Hope, of Future.
Your work marvels enemies and friends.
I remember our conversations.
And how they changed my spirit, my actions radically.
Your words were like knives that never sting, but sharpen the view.
On behalf of all the children of Chernobyl and Fukushima!
On behalf of all 2 million people who got Help from you and your wife!
Infinitely many friends mourn you. Because YOU are ONE of US!
For the Children!




“since 1989 more than 300,000 young Belarusians were able to improve their health in a clean place thanks to Gennady Grushevoy’s “Fund for the Children of Chernobyl” http://www.svaboda.org/content/article/25245635.html

“One of the organizers and active participants of the Belarusian Popular Front “Revival” (1988). Chairman of the Board of the Belarusian Charitable Fund ” Children of Chernobyl ” ( 1989 ) . Member of the Supreme Council of the Republic of Belarus , a member of the Belarusian Popular Front (1990-1995) , member of the Supreme Council of the Republic of Belarus of the 13th convocation . Chairman of the Belarusian Christian Democratic Party ( since 1996). Coordinator of the Assembly of Democratic NGOs of Belarus (1997). Organizer Youth Christian Social Union , 71 self-help groups , youth social network central ” Workshop of the Future” in different regions of Belarus ( 1997 ) , co-chair of the civil committee “Choice – 2001 ” ( 2000 ) . Member of the Coordinating Council of the International Peace Bureau (Geneva ) . Was judged as one of the organizers of the first ” Chernobyl Way ” ( 30.09.1989 ) . Coordinated the work of the First Assembly of Peoples of Chernobyl (25 – twenty-sixth eleventh 1989) in Minsk. Under his leadership fund ” Children of Chernobyl ” during his work has helped more than 2 million people in Belarus. Awarded annual prizes Norwegian Rafto Foundation for his work in the direction of protection of human rights (1999). Gennady Pear is the author of more than 200 works on philosophy and political science.” http://charter97.org/ru/news/2014/1/28/85129/

PHOTOS: http://www.svaboda.org/content/article/25245108.html

The testament of Prof. Dr. Gennady Grushevoy was published.
“When nearly five years ago, I learned that I had leukemia – a violation of the structure of DNA – I told myself I was lucky in my life, because I’m dead on with life than fighting. But I will not give up by any chance Chernobyl. My ight which started April 26, 1986, at which ‘m the last 27 years on. I am with those who worked after / a Chernobyl . My “departure” is the logical conclusion of my life. Such care was given to me by God and destiny. And I take it as a soldier in the war, because it is better to die in the attack at the front than at the “rear” of malaria.

Perhaps this fate convinces someone that Belarus has no future if the Chernobyl consequences are ignored. You can not hope to flee this tragedy or hide or escape. That is why the government should engage in a serious way concerning Chernobyl. Only then will the nation has any hope of salvation. At one time I fought for the post-Chernobyl Belarus. Today, half of Europe is fighting for me. Europeans give me the drugs that I could not give belarusian patients. And with this advance I should work on full …”

HIS NGO AND WIFE (rare footage):




Read Full Post »


How TEPCO reactor 2 lost on purpose? It was not a meltdown! ANSWER:
SRV = Safety Relief Valves – like a Pressure Cooker in your Kitchen!
To avoid a BIG explosion with a high Yield:


Example from Unit 1: “As a result, highly radioactive parts were found near the inert gas pipes, which were used to venting in 311″ http://fukushima-diary.com/2014/01/1-6-svh-on-the-first-floor-of-reactor1-highly-radioactive-source-is-in-the-vent-pipe/


The whole thing started in the morning of March 14th 2011, when the water level decreased further. TEPCO said the fuel burned, fell to ground, remained there, started to melt. BUT: Reactions = Pressure in Containment, what to do? ANSWER:
The pressure cooker recipe for reactors:
Make sure your reactor has a containment and exhaust valves.
If you notice that the water level drops, then open the valves to relieve pressure. The fuel enters into a phase transition and is drained piece by piece until the entire inventory is gone.
Tell the world public then, the core “had melted” (Then everyone believes the core is still there). Not a single photo of any molten material since 2011! But the world is told the Meltdown Fairy Tale.
Important: HIDE measuring results from the vicinity of the reactor.
BECAUSE: High values ​​indicate where the fuel was blown off and where it was distributed to. Evauation is needed, stop all Reactors. They can not afford this truth!

TEPCO cooked Reactor 2 Core and blown it out completely, to avoid a nuclear explosion of the reactor type, because of the pressure in the containment, that increased. Reactor Fuel can develop a yield of more than 1 Terrajoule, which is 0,2 – 0,3 KT TNT. No containment can survive this. AND: TO avoid that the world could learn: A nuclear explosion is possible in each reactor. THE END OF NUCLER FISSION ENERGY.

11025633_10153186028239533_7751560391560160186_n 10556258_10153186026944533_1014296922570493489_n 11035740_10153186026554533_738050946435179813_n

That’s why “25 Sv/h from the damaged stack for reactor1 and 2 / Highest reading outside of the buildings” was measured: http://fukushima-diary.com/2013/12/tepco-attached-a-dosimeter-on-the-top-of-a-pole-moved-it-by-a-minitruck-to-measure-25-svh/ quote by Fukushima-Diary.com

1.6 Sv/h on the first floor of reactor1 / Highly radioactive source is in the vent pipe (update): http://fukushima-diary.com/2014/01/1-6-svh-on-the-first-floor-of-reactor1-highly-radioactive-source-is-in-the-vent-pipe/

A dry reactor heats up 100°C every 0,1 seconds and becomes so supercritical, that it even overtakes the Doppler Effect: http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/Artikel%20zu%20Tschernobyl%20in%20Nuclear%20Technology%20Vol%2090.pdf 

It started in the evening, but The PEAK was in the very late evening of March 14th 2011. Reactor containment = Pressure Cooker for reactor fuel

1) According to KAWATA Toumio, Fellow of the Nuclear Waste Management Organization of Japan (NUMO), all reactor inventory of Fukushima Reactor 2 was released on March 14th 2011, 6:22 pm: http://www.strahlentelex.de/Stx_11_588_S01-02.pdf


What DATA exists than can explain this?

2) From TEPCO’s emergency correspondence to JAPANESE GOVERNMENT, starting March 11th 2011. Official Data: Up to 110 milli Sievert PER HOUR in air distance 0,28 km to Fukushima Plant, Wind South-East & 64 milli Sievert PER HOUR distance 4,29 km to Fukushima Plant, Wind South-East. ALL DATA: http://fukushima-diary.com/2012/04/emergency-correspondence-between-jp-gov-and-tepco-right-after-311/


Then we can read about the 400 mSv per hour measuerd near the plant (“There was a media report of a 40-rem dose measured somewhere near the plant.”) quote from NRC on PAGE 15: http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1205/ML12052A106.pdf


This is brutal high! Normal is 1 – 2 mSv per YEAR! And this combines EVERY RADIATION COMING FROM THE WHOLE UNIVERSE TO US! Credit this!

Even the daily dose at a 1000 Curie per km² area, for example near Chernobyl reactor 4 / hot sport, with 37 mio becquerel per m² (map) is something like 10 mSv PER DAY

But Fukushima! 110 milli Sievert PER HOUR! Even at a distance of 280 Meters on the Sea!

2012 / 2013 Readings:

1) Where Reactor Inventory was vented to, via wind – THE BLACK SUBSTANCE: https://www.facebook.com/notes/311-fukushima-watchdogs/black-substance-rei-shiva-en/126411687499573

2) Where Reactor Inventory was vented to, via wind: 80 km distance to Fukushima: “40 micro sv / hr = 350 Millisievert per year: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=10200465957291378&set=vb.1830343586&type=2&theater

3) Where it went on plant site: 25 Sievert near Reactor 2 – That is REACTOR FUEL! http://fukushima-diary.com/2013/12/tepco-attached-a-dosimeter-on-the-top-of-a-pole-moved-it-by-a-minitruck-to-measure-25-svh/

TEPC-NRC-ChernoFuku Chernobyl4

The control rods are made of

>> cadmium (melting point: 321.07 °C, 594.22 K, 609.93 °F)

>> silver (961°C) 1234.93 K, 1763.2 °F)

>> indium (156°C 429.7485 K, 313.8773 °F)

>> The cladding (zirconium), which they found in parts outside the plant: 1857 °C

Melting point of the UO² fuel: 2800°C.

If something goes wrong, the control rods melt first.

On 14 March 2011 at 6:22 pm clock local time there were HUGE emissions of the entire radioactive inventory of the reactor 2 with a subsequent sharp increase in the dose rate to several millisieverts per hour (mSv / h), into various areas. On the following two days there were then more fires and explosions, which were also coming from the reactor 4 which then caused Tepco to measure a local dose of 400 mSv / h. These findings were presented to Toumio Kawata, a fellow of the Nuclear Waste Management Organization of Japan, at the 16th Meeting of the Japanese nuclear Commission on 24 May 2011. “Strahlentelex” has his manuscript been made available: http://www.strahlentelex.de/Stx_11_586_S05-06.pdf

and 2014? THEY WANT A CONTROLLED MELTDOWN! http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2014/01/10/japan-nuclear-agency-to-conduct-controlled-meltdown-japan-nuclear-agency-to-conduct-controlled-meltdown

EDIT FROM 2014: http://fukushima-diary.com/2014/01/evidence-to-prove-reactor2-also-possibly-exploded-in-311-was-found-hole-on-suppression-chamber/#comment-1625622

and: hole in Fukushima Daiichi Unit 2 suppression pool http://photo.tepco.co.jp/date/2013/201311-j/130313-04j.html

nrc02 nrc01

The TEPCO Numbers fit also the flooding of the CTBTO measurement stations in Japan (CTBT global network): http://www.ctbto.org/map/#ims


“Two stations of the CTBTO network, Okinawa and Takasaki, are located in Japan, but 133Xe (XENON) measurements are made only at Takasaki. However, the Takasaki noble gas detections were, for an extended period of time, reaching the dynamic range of the system, meaning that measurements were so high that they became unreliable. Regarding the 137Cs (CESIUM) measurements at Takasaki, there was another problem:”

“During the first passage of the plume at this station, radioactivity entered the interior of the building. This resulted in a serious contamination, meaning that 137Cs shows up continuously in the measurements since the initial event, even when it is completely absent in the ambient air.”

“Both stations are part of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO) – The Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) foresees a global ban of all nuclear explosions. To verify compliance with the CTBT, a global International Monitoring System (IMS) with four different measurement technologies is currently built up, namely for seismic (170 stations), hydroacoustic (11 stations), infrasound (80 stations) and radionuclide (80 stations) monitoring. 60 particulate monitoring stations are currently delivering data to the International Data Centre of the Preparatory Commission for the CTBTO in Vienna.”

Source: http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/12/2313/2012/acp-12-2313-2012.pdf

I think the TEPCO Pollen is Triuranium octoxide – created by oxidating Uranium dioxide fuel.

No meltdown, it went outside via venting the SRV.

Pollen! TEPCO is brainwashing the people for 4 years.


SOURCES: http://fukushima-diary.com/2012/08/14-μsvh-from-the-yellow-substance-on-the-roof-in-kashiwa-chiba/ and: http://www.tostem-fc.jp/blog.php?post_cmd=kosin&post_blogdir=5000457&post_eid=153277 and: http://fukushima-diary.com/2011/10/yellow-powder-caught-by-camera-beside-reactor-4/ and: http://www.nukem.de/uranium/u3o8.html and: http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML0716/ML071690245.pdf

TEPCO invents sometimes fictitious measurements or gets them from the textbook – at the same time CTBTO Data is covered up. BUT: The “Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics (ZAMG) in Vienna, which also has access to the measurement results of the CTBTO, presented at the end of March 2011 a significantly higher leakage of radioactivity from Fukushima, as the Japanese authorities publicly announced – based on their data, the WHO and the IAEA. General Secretary Chan of the WHO said the WHO would publish CTBTO measurement data  “only if it’s dangerous values.” If that is the case, they decide “alone”.

The CTBTO stations are all equipped with high-volume aerosol samplers. (…) As part of CTBT treaty monitoring, half of the radionuclide stations shall additionally be equipped with xenon detectors. FLEXPART is also the model operationally used at CTBTO for atmospheric backtracking and at the Austrian Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics for emergency response as well as CTBT verification purposes.

According to estimates by the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO), comprised of 60 monitoring stations world-wide under the auspices of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, the first three days of the Fukushima accident alone released about 3.8 x 10 ^ 17 Bq of radioactive Iodine-131. That is about 100 times the official inventory. The Fukushima disaster has also released significant amounts of several other radionuclides which have not even been measured.

The UN General Assembly adopted the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court on July 17, 1998. On July 1, 2002 the statute came into force. “The International Criminal Court is a permanent tribunal to prosecute individuals for genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes.” (Wikipedia, 03/25/2011)

Thus far, the ICC has not accepted criminal or civil cases involving the destruction of natural resources and environmental terrorism. The establishment of its authority to do so is long overdue.

In relation to the ongoing accident at Fukushima, responsible officials from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the World Health Organization (WHO), the operating company (TEPCO) and Japanese nuclear power regulators should be brought before the International Criminal Court and held accountable for their actions.

Failure to aid in tens of thousands of cases and threats to natural resources hundreds of thousands if not millions of people is a Felony.

The behavior of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the World Health Organization (WHO) following the reactor accident of Fukushima is a scandal. WHO has made public statements trivializing the emergency and ceding all of its responsibilities to the IAEA, citing the treaty of 1957. “What is WHO’s role in nuclear emergencies? Answer by WHO: “Within the United Nations system, the IAEA is the lead agency for coordination of international response to radiation events.” (World Health Organization, Japan Nuclear Concerns, FAQ, 14 March 2011, Geneva)

The IAEA – an organization whose Board of Governors is dominated by and comprised almost entirely of nuclear industry members, holds fast to its opinion that Fukushima should be assessed at Level 5 on the International Rating scale for significant events in nuclear facilities (INES).

The quantity of radioactive Iodine-131 released is a central indicator for the evaluation of nuclear accidents on the INES scale. The release of more than “a few 10 ^ 16 Bq of iodine 131” is classified as a level 7 catastrophic accident this (INES) scale.

Apparently, the IAEA, TEPCO and the Japanese government officials in charge have not clearly stated how much radioactive material has been released throughout the unfolding of the Fukushima disaster.

Due to these figures, the Fukushima accident would have been legitimately classified as INES level 7 before IAEA admitted it, too late!

Focus on all info regarding Unit 2 at TEPCO’s Holocaust Reactor in Japan. So far, NRC blacked out everything: https://tekknorg.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/nrc01.jpg Why this is important, you ask? ALL radiation maps are false lies, if a WHOLE Core was lost into air, NOT meltdown. This is why: Unit 2 was emptied by TEPCO. Cooking and venting, cooking and venting. Com’on! You know it from your kitchen. All statistics are false, all estimates, all official language rules, everything! There was so much blown out, that each human theoretically can carry 37,000,000,000 becquerel of everything in the body. And more. https://tekknorg.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/reactor2-no-meltdown.jpg
How can we tolerate such a lie that threatens everything there? We must start, looking for clues. We are told there were meltdowns. There is abolutely NO evidence. No photo, no nothing. It is just a theory. The WHOLE meltdown scenario was invented once in a time by the nuke industry to give us the feeling, that even in worst case scenarios everything is safe. But a reator can go apeshit and blow out everything, while the Containment remains stable. And we
bleat like good stupid sheep “Meltdown” – “Meltdown”. And nothing, only words from so called experts! For three years! If I call you a criminal, do people believe it, without any evidence? I hope not! Look the other way! Demand evidence, not textbook and cheap calculations that look so smart. They only calculate what THEY think is real, NOT what REALLY is REAL. For THIS they use textbooks, theories and symbols. Because we live in the age of the simulation, we confuse symbol with reality. Especially when it comes the the invisible, the Radioactive Atom. Because the fact, that a reactor loses IT ALL smashes the industry into pieces, before the day begins! Beause that is the nail for their coffin, for this murderous enterprise. Because if a whole Core is lost, EVEN the industry’s most optimistic, best calculated system is so owerpowered by this single fact, that there is more radiation than needed to overtake their risk-radiation-damage-models they use to avoid compensation and evacuation. Everything would fall! A whole century of lies and lies. This is what we need. Friends, let’s look for it. Everything is WRONG with Unit 2. Absolutely everything. t’s laughable! While TEPCO was sending highest Sievert per hour mesurements round the clock the the Jap. Government, NRC says some reading THEY get, the NRC, can’t be true. And why is that? Because the Radiation Output from TEPCO’s hell was SO HIGH, the machines measurring became unrealiable, they were NOT prepared for so high readings. Context people! It is not seperate! low numbers from textbook / not reality = NO evacuation needed = MO’MONEY! Life Upgrade for Nuke Industry. Are you with me! Right now they build a 2nd sarophagus over Chernobyl! An empty reactor! A lie on top of a lie! While the world watches! How to look for clues, I tried to explain with this article. It was only possible with the help of good friends, to get the facts: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2014/02/09/the-future-is-on-fire/

Thanks to Fukushima-Diary.com! http://fukushima-diary.com/2012/04/emergency-correspondence-between-jp-gov-and-tepco-right-after-311/


Read Full Post »


The Invisible blurs the causality.
The Symptom dresses up as Cause.


Protection against Fear, not against Radiation!

quote from the latest nuclear gag contract:
Contract between IAEA and Fukushima Medical University (“Dr” Yamashita)
“…the IAEA will endeavour to organize conferences, seminars and workshops, in cooperation with the University, with the aim of enhancing public awareness of radiological effects on human health and addressing the issue of “radiation fear” and post-traumatic stress disorders in the Fukushima population…” http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/energy/fukushima_2012/pdfs/fukushima_iaea_en_06.pdf

basis for this gag contract was the first one, quote:

“it is recognized by the World Health Organization that the International Atomic Energy Agency has the primary responsibility for encouraging, assisting and coordinating research and development and practical application of atomic energy for peaceful uses throughout the world without prejudice to the right of the World Health Organization to concern itself with promoting, developing, assisting and coordinating international health work, including research, in all its aspects.” http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/Others/inf20.shtml#note_c


radiation fear = Radiophobia – a non medical term: “What’s worse, the IAEA is going public these days with statements ridiculing the so called “radiophobia” of the population and calling for an end of aid programs, which, according to the IAEA report of 2005, only serve to instil a victim mentality in a totally healthy population – a claim not only cynical, but potentially dangerous for the health of the affected population.” Source: http://www.ippnw-students.org/chernobyl/coverup.html

“Presently the international organizations (WHO, IAEA) recognize as the main cause of increase of thyroid cancer in liquidators and children population after the accident their irradiation with radioactive iodine, I-131. The rest of diseases, they suppose, are provoked by psycho-emotional reactions..” (!!!…RADIOPHOBIA…!!!) There is no linear dose effect correlation, but “The bimodal dependence of effects on dose was revealed for all studied parameters. Namely, effects increased at low doses, reached maximum (for low doses), then decreased (in some cases the effect sign reversed) and thereafter increased with the increase of dosage”: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Burlakova.pdf


THE RESULT: The new IAEA Killer Agenda: http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/pressreleases/2012/prn201234.html

IAEA invites people to come back to Fukushima. Wth kind support of the local and national authorities, the World Health Organisation, and the Fukushima Medical University. Irradiated ares will become cheap Land. Very attractive.

This IAEA program means: Resettlement of people in irradiated areas, “overcoming” the situation by ignoring the situation, Rehabilitation means: Restoration. NOT of the people, but of the IRRADIATED land, into “normality”. Radiation is forced ON the people, INTO the people, by calling it normality, and encouraging the people to come back.

This program is fed by the IAEA annual budget of over 300 millon EUR and by the nuclear industry: http://www.iaea.org/About/budget.html

while the WHO relies on Sponsoring…


“According to its statutes, the IAEA (a UN agency which reports to the Security Council) is mandated to “to accelerate and enlarge the contribution of atomic energy to peace, health and prosperity throughout the world”. It is in fact a lobby, industrial and military, which should have no role to play in public health policymaking or research.” http://mondediplo.com/2008/04/14who

whoiaeawha WHOIAEA01 cheap-death

MORE: IAEA protects against Truth and irradiates People

MORE: Japan goes the same way as Belarus: Dictatorship – a deep insight

MORE: Margaret Chan VERSUS World Health Organisation

Read Full Post »


How does someone look suffering from cancer in the final stage?
Can not walk, eat, drink, talk …
As somone old, “dying natural…”



The pro nuclear New York Times says in their latest Cancer article: “Why Everyone Seems to Have Cancer”SOURCE: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/05/sunday-review/why-everyone-seems-to-have-cancer.html?smid=fb-nytimes&WT.z_sma=OP_WES_20140105

SEEMS to have Cancer.

A total Denial of the increase of Cancer.

“According to the National Cancer Institute, cancer incidence (all sites) in the US increased by 55% between 1950 and 1995; the trends in Europe and other industrialised nations are similar. Non-smoking related cancers are responsible for about 75% of the overall increased incidence of cancer since 1950, and cannot be explained in terms of better detection or ageing” http://www.preventcancer.com/publications/cancer-gate.php

The same New York Times said 1996: “Chernobyl “compressed several thousand years of evolution into a decade” and “Inherited Damage Is Found In Chernobyl Area Children: changes in DNA in sperm and eggs. Such mutations are passed on from generation to generation.” SOURCE: http://www.nytimes.com/1996/05/07/science/chernobyl-s-voles-live-but-mutations-surge.html

AND, also from New York Times 1996: “Radiation at any level is a uniquely potent cause of chromosome mutations that can lead to so-called irregularly inherited disorders like heart disease, cancer, diabetes, multiple sclerosis, schizophrenia, asthma, rheumatoid arthritis, Alaheimer’s disease and many, many more.” http://www.nytimes.com/2000/06/25/nyregion/l-even-background-levels-of-radiation-are-harmful-922897.html

The World Health Organisation also fakes history and statistics: “The second category involves dozens of manipulations of data, among them: averaging exposures over entire populations and ignoring local sources of concentrated contamination; ending studies after 10 years thereby excluding long term morbidity and mortality; qualifying five year survival as “cure”, only considering cancer, those still alive and the three most affected countries; claiming decreases in childhood cancers when in fact children have become adults with cancer and therefore no longer appear in that database.” SOURCE: http://mondediplo.com/2008/04/14who

ONE radiograph during pregnancy: 20 % increase for cancer probability before the child is 10 years old. Two radiographs during pregnancy: 28 %. Three: 70 %. FOUR:…. 100 PERCENT. There is NO SAFE LEVEL OF RADIATION EXPOSURE: http://books.google.de/books?id=aAoAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA30&lpg=PA30&dq=cancer+stewart+xray+1970+radiographs&source=bl&ots=UGZYt0TZGo&sig=ENE9wYZjjNs3Rh2XyptdZwP3Ucw&hl=de&ei=7545Tu6iF8aAOsLrvbMG&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&sqi=2&ved=0CBsQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false

This goes with 100 years old knowledge: In 1914 Thomas Boveri found that Genomic Instability causes Malignancy of Cancer – and that Genomic Instability is also caused by RADIATION “quote: “existence of cancers produced by X-rays” : http://jcs.biologists.org/content/121/Supplement_1/1.full

The genomic instability is passed on in the genes and increases exponentially with each generation” = what New York Times said 1996 and what Boveri found out.

SEEMS to have?


Alexei Yablokov (Russia) Doctor of Biological Sciences, advisor to the Russian Academy of Sciences, said: Among of the main effects of the Chernobyl disaster is to be found in the increase of ilnesses’ incidence and prevalence:

• increase in cancers;
• accelerated aging; ACCELERATED AGING!

more: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/06/02/%E3%82%A2%E3%83%AC%E3%82%AF%E3%82%BB%E3%82%A4%C2%B7%E3%83%A4%E3%83%96%E3%83%AD%E3%82%B3%E3%83%95-may-12th-2012/

Earlier onset of cancer = Accelerated Aging = Radiation Effect.

Accelerated aging! And this why we find diseases of the old in children. Perfect Example: Thyroid Cancer – see below: Who understands the thyroid cancer phenomenon? A frightening text:
There are two main findings. Only the first will be understood and is always mentioned, by doctors, media: 1) The increase of thyroid cancer, in children. And: The increase of cysts and other changes.


Not so understood: These are usually the precursor of cancer. Digested? Well,
then there is 2) Thyroid Cancer WAS uncommon. Totally. One out One Million. Before the Atomic Age (During the period 1935 – 1944: less than one in a million cases, it was declining

It increased 5 fold since 1945). AND: It was a cancer of OLD people. NOT children. Dear readers, friends. Nuclear Reactors make us more mortal – They lead to an earlier onset of diseases that only older people had. It is a kind of an accelerated evolution. Now it becomes clear why are more and more ill, and also EARLIER. Diseases – of which no one knows WHY. Alzheimer’s, dementia, diabetes type 1, Preemies, mental illness, autism, stillbirths… And these few generations living and born since the nuclear age, are only one second of a long journey. If the invisible disguises itself by taking the shape of The Known… it is no wonder, experts fail to blame the real offender. Parents pay the killer of their children, with the monthly electricity bill. Nuclear Safety and dose limits allow peaceful murder. Victims of the nuclear cellular apocalypse are simply called “cancer patients.” Then even laws are passed, so is not reported on nuclear issues. I ask: Who dares to look into it’s face and rip the mask away? If the self-evident became an offense. If you do, you’re welcome. We can not count on experts per se, but on the new thinking. Remember what Einstein said: the possibility of a chain reaction “never occurred to me”.

The latest total schizophrenic saying of the New York Times sound like IAEA policy: IAEA protecting against Truth and irradiating People: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2013/11/27/iaea-protects-against-truth-and-irradiates-people/

They say Cancer and Radiation are not the problem: Resettlement of people in irradiated areas is ok, “overcoming” the situation by ignoring the situation is important, Rehabilitation means: Restoration. NOT of the people, but of the IRRADIATED land, into “normality”. Radiation is forced ON the people, INTO the people, by calling it normality, and encouraging the people to come back. This program is fed by the IAEA annual budget of over 300 millon EUR and by the nuclear industry: http://www.iaea.org/About/budget.html

it is recognized by the World Health Organization that the International Atomic Energy Agency has the primary responsibility for encouraging, assisting and coordinating research and development and practical application of atomic energy for peaceful uses throughout the world without prejudice to the right of the World Health Organization to concern itself with promoting, developing, assisting and coordinating international health work, including research, in all its aspects.http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/Others/inf20.shtml#note_c

Einstein also said: “The splitting of the atom has changed everything except our way of thinking, and thus we drift towards unparalleled catastrophe”. Albert Einstein http://www.icucec.org/files/art-chernobylrem.pdf

This is why we confuse symbol with reality. Experts and media (as New York Times above) see the waves NOT THE OCEAN!


> If a radiation-caused cancer is not fatal, it is not counted in the IAEA’s figures

> If a cancer is initiated by another carcenogen, but accelerated or promoted by exposure to radiation, it is not counted.

> If an auto-immune disease or any non-cancer is caused by radiation, it is not counted.

> Radiation-damaged embryos or foetuses which result in miscarriage or stillbirth do not count

> A congenitally blind, deaf or malformed child whose illnesses are are radiation-related are not included in the figures because this is not genetic damage, but rather is teratogenic, and will not be passed on later to the child’s offspring.

> Causing the genetic predisposition to breast cancer or heart disease does not count since it is not a “serious genetic disease” in the Mendelian sense.

> Even if radiation causes a fatal cancer or serious genetic disease in a live born infant, it is discounted if the estimated radiation dose is below 100 mSv [mSv= millisievert, a measurement of radiation exposure. One hundred millsievert is the equivalent in radiation of about 100 X-Rays].

> Even if radiation causes a lung cancer, it does not count if the person smokes — in fact whenever there is a possibility of another cause, radiation cannot be blamed.

> If all else fails, it is possible to claim that radiation below some designated dose does not cause cancer, and then average over the whole body the radiation dose which has actually been received by one part of the body or even organ, as for instance when radio-iodine concentrates in the thyroid. This arbitrary dilution of the dose will ensure that the 100 mSv cut-off point is nowhere near reached. It is a technique used to dismiss the sickness of Gulf War veterans who inhaled small particles of ceramic uranium which stayed in their lungs for more than two years, and in their bodies for more than eight years, irradiating and damaging cells in a particular part of the body. SOURCE: http://exacteditions.theecologist.org/read/resurgence/vol-29-no-7-november-1999-5368/28/3

Radioactive Atoms are SMALLER than any GMO or Virus. Plus: Virus are mutated by radioactive atoms. “It is well known that radiation can cause mutations in bacteria and viruses. Andrei Sakharov, the famous Russian physicist, described in his 1992 Memoirs that even at low levels radiation could increase mutations of bacteria and viruses. His predictions, which were originally made in 1958, have come true and we are seeing new ailments such as Reye’s syndrome which first appeared in 1963, and Legionnaires’ disease, which is caused by a bacteria that was not threatening prior to 1976. AIDS may be related to a mutated virus combined with a weakened immunity in a generation born after the first nuclear weapons were detonated.” http://www.nuclearreader.info/chapter1.html

Prof. Dr. Hedy fritz-niggli, Switzerland: “Ionizing radiation produces the same mutations as they occur naturally. The former, however, gives rise to coarser changes of chromosome structure. Mutations are irreversible injuries. Smallest doses may cause harm.The present stage of our knowledge does not permit an accurate statement on the kind of mutation. We can only see extreme changes of ion-density exercise influence the number of the mutations produced. At the various stages of the formation of germcells sensitivity to radiation is different. Water content and oxygen tension of the environments bear on the number of mutations produced. Anoxybiosis protects against radiation effects so that these occur mainly indirectly.Germ cells of various age respond in a different way to ion-density and to changes in environment.” https://www.thieme-connect.com/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/s-0029-1212990

In 1970 he said:
10 milli gray create 2 point mutations among 1,000 gametes. These are one seventieth ofl the natural mutation rate. If you take all chromosome mutations 10 milli gray produce one-tenth of the total mutation rate. If each year the maximum allowable dose is reached (5 mSv) the genetic mutation rate is increased in 30 years (one generation) by a fifth.

I add: We don’t see the primarily “BIG” mutations, with many legs. Instead it’s what we do not see: The genetically induced malignancy. And this takes time. This is how Fukushima and Chernobyl “work”.

Read Full Post »


Interview “Hessischer Rundfunk” (Radio Station Germany) with Dr. Rosa Goncharova, from Minsk, Belarus http://www.hr-online.de/servlet/de.hr.cms.servlet.File/11-042?enc=d3M9aHJteXNxbCZibG9iSWQ9MTIwMTQ3NTImaWQ9NDExMDgxNDEmZm9yY2VEb3dubG9hZD0x


photo from VIDEO “Nuclear Controversies” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zCIto-rsa8o

She is a speaker at the coming Symposium “Consequences of Nuclear disasters of Nature and Man” – sign and attend here: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2014/01/01/sign-march-4th-7th-2014-chernobyl-fukushima-symposium-with-real-independent-experts/


02 Speaker 1 “An everyday scene in the radiological monitoring station of Komarin in Belarus: A woman knocks on the laboratory door and brings a plastic bag full of pumpkin seeds. Here, levels of radioactivity of food from the contaminated zone is measured.

04 Speaker 1 “We are only about 30 kilometers from Chernobyl and close to the exclusion zone. The remote village is heavily contaminated since the nuclear disaster in neighboring Ukraine . Who lives here, who collects mushrooms here or foods of unknown origin carries home, would do well to let them inspect before consumption.

06 Speaker 1 “If the maximum permissible dose too strong exceeds, the food will be disposed as hazardous waste in the deserted 30 – kilometer zone.

08 Speaker 1 “The Woman with the pumpkin seeds is lucky. The limit of 270 becquerels per kilogram is not exceeded. Anastasija Fedosenko  director of the laboratory, complains : “In this area there is only a single measurement station, which is freely accessible to residents at all times . Previously there were six .

10 Speaker 1 “In Belarus, hundreds of thousands of people in areas that are contaminated by the explosion of the Chernobyl reactor still for centuries live there. Today it is mainly cesium -137, which provides for continuous radiation . Cesium-137 has a half -life of about 30 years. The safety formula is in the West: ” half-life x 13 times” . Eastern scientists anticipate ” half-life x 10 times” . According to these formulas, cesium -137 is not harmful to humans after Eastern invoice after 301 years , according to Western accounts it is dangerous even after 392 years. In other words, only after about 13 generations of men, the danger is gone.

12 Speaker 1 change of location. “Rosa Goncharova ‘s geneticist. In the Belarusian capital, Minsk, she directs the Laboratory of the Institute of Genetics and Cytology of the Belarusian Academy of Sciences. For decades, the professor and her team investigate the effects of long-lasting radioactive low-level radiation . What harm take people living in contaminated areas? Have to life, because otherwise 2600 villages must be relocated. Rosa Gonchrova summarizes the results of their studies this way:

13 Russian original sound Goncharova
14 Voice Over 1 “One of the key findings from Chernobyl is the fact that even low doses of ionizing radiation in animals and humans have biological and genetic consequences. This is proved today . They produce damage in the body cells and in gametes. Genetic changes were observed in our laboratory Even at a low dose of less than 100 microsieverts and even at a tolerated annual dose of one millisievert .

15 Speaker 1 “round a Milllisievert per year : This is the annual dose limit for people who do not work with these ionizing radiations and our research team found changes in the genetic material of the cell nucleus with this dose limit. For occupationally exposed persons even higher limits apply in Europe

16 Russian original sound Goncharova
17 Voice Over 1 Man , “like every other living thing, man has protection systems that repair such mutations. If man is now under the influence of additional radioactivity it is an additional burden to the organism, he must fight also against it, mutation occur.

18 Speaker 1 “But what are the consequences? Rosa Goncharova explains one of the effects on the basis of observations in children in the contaminated areas .”

19 Russian original sound Goncharova
20 Voice Over 1 “For these children, changes were found involving single genes. And the bad thing is that these children have an increased sensitivity to other unfavorable factors. That is, these children fall ill more often than others. Among the unfavorable factors are poor diet, environmental factors, chemical pollution. This applies not only for children but also for adults. They all have an increased sensitivity to other unfavorable factors.

[ personal addition;
Not better diagnostics

21 Speaker 1 In plain English: “Who has spent his life in contaminated area, whose immune system is weakened. Radioactivity opens the doors for other health problems. The most dangerous radiation is that which is consumed in the diet. Thus, cesium -137 , for example acts from the inside on the cells, since it displaces the vital potassium in muscle tissue. Or, strontium -90, a radionuclide , which accumulates in the bones and in the bone marrow : It can get damage blood cells and as a result blood cancer can be caused”

“On the question of whether they are inherited changes in the genetic material to the next generation” , says geneticist Rosa Goncharova :

22 Russian original sound Goncharova
23 VoiceOver 1 , “we have shown for the first time genetic changes over generations of time passed in our laboratory. We have found a genomic instability after Chernobyl over 22 animal generations. These are animals that live in the contaminated areas who have to live under the influence of low doses. We have scientifically proven.”

24 Speaker 1 “Proven with one of the most common mammals in the bank vole. The cells of these mice were comparable with those of the people , says the researcher. Therefore, one could transfer many findings from it to man.

25 Russian original sound Goncharova
26 Voice Over 1 “Even after 22 generations of mice you can still see changes, mutations. They are inherited . The radioactivity remains Harmful . It so happens that many offspring or even many embryos do not survive . Those who survive , somehow come to terms with the situation. But whose genetic material is unstable , and that they also give in the next generation. And they are often sick. Your whole system is more unstable than in other animals .

[ personal addition; Mice developed a new type of cancer, AFTER 25 GENERATIONS (quote: “unusual cancer after 25 generations” at http://books.google.de/books?id=3gUAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA56&lpg=PA56#v=onepage&q=mewissen%20fo-cuses%20on%2025&f=false

27 Speaker 1 “This means that you pay a price.” Rosa Goncharova :
28 O-Ton Rosa Goncharova
29 VoiceOver 1 “The mortality rate in these animals is very very high. But mice produce very many offspring  and therefore they CAN afford a high death rate. Man, however, will usually produce only one child. Definitely not five, six, seven at a time. In addition, he does not bring several generations in a year or during his life to the world. So we can not transfer all parts of the results that actually are transmitto humans.

30 Speaker 1″The effects of low doses of radiation are pointed in  a study that was published in December 2010 in Germany . It says within 35 kilometers of a nuclear plant fewer girls are born than in areas without nuclear power . We investigated the region of 27 plants in Germany and four in Switzerland. Less female births were stated earlier : In regions that were hit by the Chernobyl radioactive precipitation . It is believed that female embryos are more radiosensitive and therefore more likely to die than male .


[personal addition: “The sex ratio (ratio of male to female live births) is significantly decreased in October 2011, 7 months after the Fukushima reactor accident. The sex ratio in October 2011 is lowest in the whole study period (January 1998 through March 2013).” http://alfred-koerblein.de/fukushima/english/index.htm

[personal additon: “the human sex ratio at birth in several European countries before and after the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant accident was investigated. A long-term chronic impact of radioactive fallout on the secondary sex ratio has been found” http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/env.958/abstract;jsessionid=69E27384F9B8CCE48A54AADC6FDA0606.d02t03

[personal addition: Millions Fewer Girls Born: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2011/06/110602-millions-fewer-girls-nuclear-radiation-births-science/

[personal addition: http://www.atomkongress.de/z_folien_busby.pdf – quote: “Nuclear site child leukemia and cancer clusters (Sellafield, Dounreay, La Hague, Aldermaston discovered in the period 1983-1996. Causality denied by
ICRP, COMARE, UNSCEAR, BEIR, WHO, EU and Nuclear Industry.” and: “New research shows that if a cell is hit, its progeny are likely to suffer from an increased tendency to general mutation. This is called genomic instability.”  PAGE 2 + 3]
32 Speaker 1 “mathematics teaching in a school in the region of Gomel. The second largest city of Belarus and the surrounding areas were severely affected by the Chernobyl around. – Aliaksandr Dmitrievitch is in Gomel director of the State radioecological Institute. There, too,do scientists research of potential consequences of low-level radiation. In the white blood cells of mice, says Aliaksandr Dmitirevitch, changes in the cell nucleus during long periods of low-level radiation are observed . And that five to eight times as often as in the control group.

[personal addition: overview Gomel: http://www.rbic.by/…/articles/files/Oblast_Gomel-Map.pdf

33 Russian original sound Dmitrievich
34 Voice Over 2 “There are changes in the DNA structure . For example, rings or micronuclei form . These are changes in the structure of DNA chains. There, for example, arise fractures.

[personal addition: https://tekknorg.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/128.jpg?w=700&h= LINK with more Scans: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2013/04/08/direct-damage-to-people-attributable-to-chernobyl/

35 Speaker 1 “The younger the mice, the faster you see changes, says Dmitirevitch .”

[personal addition: Nesterenko, founder of BELRAD: “Children receive the highest doses, because the dose coefficients, in a 3 year old child, are 5 times higher than in adults.“ https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/children-radiation-maps-2/

36 Russian original sound Dmitrievich
37 Voice Over 2 “The effect of ionizing radiation on an organism can accelerate the development of cancer.”
38 Speaker 1 “In laboratory rats , researchers at the radioecological Institute in Gomel have made a more frightening discovery.

39 Russian original sound Dmitrievich
40 Voice Over 2 “The sixth generation comes not to the world. There is simply no sixth generation, it works somehow no longer with the offspring.

41 Speaker 1 “Aliaksandr Dmitrievitch emphasizes, however, that the observed cell damage can also be caused by other environmental influences . Therefore, a direct relationship has not been established with Chernobyl : A set that can be heard by most of Belarusian scientists. Although there is ample evidence of the relationship between cell damage and radioactive low-level radiation. But there are no independent institutions in Belarus. You are responsible for all the doctrine of the authoritarian state. And today played down the consequences of the Chernobyl disaster . – Aliaksandr Dmitrievitch but does not want to play down after insisting the influence of radioactivity.”

[personal addition: Lukashenka wants to repopulate Chernobyl Chernobyl’s Zone “quickly” http://charter97.org/en/news/2009/4/26/17680/

[personal addition: “The Foundation The Children of Chernobyl in Belarus had to gave up it’s legal status in Januar 2014. A new organization was founded and the application for legal recognition.
Twice, however, the name had to be changed – the word “Chernobyl”  is NOT allowed anymore and must not appear in the new name!

He says :

42 Russian original sound Dmitrievich
43 Voice Over 2 “It is always inflicts damage. And depending on how big the damage to the cells is and as many occur at onc, it can eventually lead to death.

49 Speaker 1 “The consequences of the Chernobyl disaster are  far from over. The people of Belarus, so it looks for many decades, if not centuries, is to suffer the consequences.”

[personal addition: “not until 2016, at the earliest, will we know the full number of those likely to develop serious medical conditions.” former Secretary-General Kofi Annan http://www.un.org/ha/chernobyl/docs/sgsm7778.htm

“The activity concentrations of 137Cs, 134Cs, 90Sr, 238Pu, 239,240Pu, 241Pu and 241Am in soil and in animals were measured at five monitoring sites with different ground deposition of radionuclides at different distances from the destroyed reactor. The observed temporal pattern of the radionuclide activity concentration in the studied animal populations reflects the changes in biological availability of these isotopes for biota, mostly due to fuel particle destruction and appearance of dissolved and exchangeable forms of radionuclides. Maximal values of the whole-body absorbed dose rates occurred during the year of deposition, followed by a decrease in the subsequent period. Generally, this decrease was monotonic, mainly determined by the decrease of the external c-ray dose rate, but there were exceptions due to the delayed maximum of internal exposure. The inter-individual distributions of radionuclide concentrations and lifetime whole-body absorbed doses were asymmetric and close to log-normal, including concentrations and doses considerably higher than the population mean values.” PDF: http://www.enfants-tchernobyl-belarus.org/extra/pdf-divers/telecharge.php?pdf=etb-037.pdf

“There are data on high rates of genic mutations in animal and human populations in the areas radiocontaminated by the Chernobyl fallout. So, the frequency of germline mutations at human minisatellite loci in children born on heavily polluted areas of Belarus was found to be twice as high as in the control group. In two species of voles (Microtus arvalis and M. rossiaemeridionalis), collected near the Chernobyl nuclear power plant, the range of genic mutations was hundreds of times greater than those typically found in vertebrates. Taking into account increased sensitivity of cells of different organs and tissues of animals from chronically irradiated populations to induction of all types of mutations – genic, genomic (polyploid cells) and structural (chromosome aberrations), it is necessary to emphasise that the areas with a wide range of radiocontamination density due to the Chernobyl fallout (8-2351 kBq/m² in our tests) are zones with high genetic risk for animals and man.” http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Goncharova.pdf

“Base-pair substitution rates for the mitochondrial cytochrome beta gene of free-living, native populations of voles collected next to reactor 4 at Chernobyl, Ukraine, were estimated by two independent methods to be in excess of 10(-4) nucleotides per site per generation. These estimates are hundreds of times greater than those typically found in mitochondria of vertebrates, suggesting that the environment resulting from this nuclear power plant disaster is having a measurable genetic impact on the organisms of that region. Despite these DNA changes, vole populations thrive and reproduce in the radioactive regions around the Chernobyl reactor.” http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8614463

“Transgenerational accumulation of radiation damage in small mammals chronically exposed to Chernobyl fallout” PDF: http://www.enfants-tchernobyl-belarus.org/extra/pdf-divers/telecharge.php?pdf=etb-068.pdf “With regard to the continuous buildup of transgenerationally-transmitted damage in the course of chronic radiation exposure of the parental generations, we will shortly speak of the transgenerational accumulation of transmitted biological damage” ignored by World’s Science.

Prof. Dr. Hedy fritz-niggli, Switzerland: “Ionizing radiation produces the same mutations as they occur naturally. The former, however, gives rise to coarser changes of chromosome structure. Mutations are irreversible injuries. Smallest doses may cause harm.The present stage of our knowledge does not permit an accurate statement on the kind of mutation. We can only see extreme changes of ion-density exercise influence the number of the mutations produced. At the various stages of the formation of germcells sensitivity to radiation is different. Water content and oxygen tension of the environments bear on the number of mutations produced. Anoxybiosis protects against radiation effects so that these occur mainly indirectly.Germ cells of various age respond in a different way to ion-density and to changes in environment.” https://www.thieme-connect.com/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/s-0029-1212990

In 1970 he said:
10 milli gray create 2 point mutations among 1,000 gametes. These are one seventieth ofl the natural mutation rate. If you take all chromosome mutations 10 milli gray produce one-tenth of the total mutation rate. If each year the maximum allowable dose is reached (5 mSv) the genetic mutation rate is increased in 30 years (one generation) by a fifth.

Read Full Post »


March2014a March2014


Start: March 4th 2014 18:00 (6 pm)

End: march 7th .2014 13:00 (1 pm)

Sign until Januar 20th 2014! (FORM BELOW)

The speakers will be translated into german & english & japanese!

At this specialist consultation doctors from Germany , America, Belarus and other countries will share findings about the diseases as a result of the nuclear disaster by Chernobyl and Fukushima and discuss ways of medical treatment. This event is organized in cooperation of the Centre ecumenism EKHN with the German Section of the International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War , Physicians for Social Responsibility Association ( IPPNW  / PSR) .

Head: Dr. Dörte Siedentopf , IPPNW / Board (her article SILENT DEATH: German: http://www.n-tv.de/Spezial/Horrorszenario-wartet-auf-Japan-article2887296.html English: http://fukushima-diary.com/2011/11/slow-death/) Here, she is speaking: http://vimeo.com/22981871

and Dr. Martin Repp , Commissioner for dialogue with Asian religions in the center ecumenism EKHN

Target Audience: Physicians, scientists , environmentalists, and Committed in initiatives that take care of the people from radiation- polluted areas in various ways.

Martin Niemöller House , AmEichwaldsfeld 3 (STREET), 61389 Schmitten / Arnoldshain (CITY)

Contacthttp://www.zentrum-oekumene-ekhn.de , E-MAIL martina.schreiber (at) zoe- ekhn.de

No nuclear shills allowed. Real Science, No BEIR, no WHO, no IAEA, no UNSCEAR, no BEIR folk. No Kan, no NRC. Just real experts, with 20+ years Chernobyl field experience. Fighting official rule, for the truth:



with english translation added:

conference2014a conference2014c

WITHOUT. Mail and SIGN!:

conference2014b conference2014d



Dr. Rosa Goncharova, from Minsk, Belarus (100% irradiated) :

“I think that increased thyroid cancer incidence of children from irradiated parents would be first manifestation of the induced genomic instability”: http://vivretchernobyl.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/presentation-of-rosa-goncharova-genomic-instability-after-chernobyl-prognosis-for-the-coming-generations/

Rosa Goncharova‘s geneticist. In the Belarusian capital Minsk, she directs the laboratory of the Institute of Genetics and Cytology of the Belorussian Academy of Sciences. For decades, the research professor and her team investigated the effects of long-lasting radioactive low-level radiation.

What harm take people living in contaminated areas? LINK: http://www.hr-online.de/servlet/de.hr.cms.servlet.File/11-042?enc=d3M9aHJteXNxbCZibG9iSWQ9MTIwMTQ3NTImaWQ9NDExMDgxNDEmZm9yY2VEb3dubG9hZD0x

“Even after 22 generations of mice you can still see changes, mutations. They are inherited. The radioactivity is harmful. So it happens that many offspring do not survive or even many embryos. Those who survive are somehow cope with the situation. But whose genome is unstable, and they also pass into the next generation. And often they are ill. Their whole system is more unstable than in other animals.”

Dr. Keith Baverstock (http://www.kbaverstock.org/) VIDEO http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQZr8jbiGH0

“Keith Baverstock, PhD, a graduate of London University, led the Radiation Protection Programme at the World Health Organisation’s Regional Office for Europe from 1991 to 2003, initially at the European Centre for Environment and Health in Rome, Italy since its foundation in 1991. From 1998 to 2002 he set-up a dedicated project office in Helsinki for nuclear emergencies and public health and in 2002 he transferred to the WHO’s European Centre for Environment and Health located in Bonn where he was the Regional Advisor for Radiation and Public Health.” His bureau was closed by pressure from the nuclear industry http://www.chernobylcongress.org/speakers/artikel/2cc0de2cee21dc8506748b53a7d1e584/keith-baverstock.html”

“By mid 1998 first draft of the Guidelines was circulating between IAEA and WHO at the management level.

“Although there had been a clear agreement between the two organisations at
the management level and the work had taken place openly the IAEA withdrew
at that stage strongly advising that the whole issue should either be dropped or
revised. The issue was the proposal to lower the action level for implementation
from 100mGy to 10mGy dose to the thyroid’s of children.”

Dr. Ian Farilie (http://www.ianfairlie.org/) VIDEO http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkGEzuOiUYY

“Dr. Ian Fairlie is a radiobiologist from Great Britain. He works as an independent consultant in the field of radioactivity in the environment and advises environmental organisations, the European Parliament as well as local and national authorities in several countries. Fairlie studied chemistry at the University of Western Ontario in Canada and radiobiology at Barts Medical College in London. He wrote his doctorate on the effects of radioactive contamination in the vicinity of Sellafield and La Hague.” http://www.chernobylcongress.org/speakers/artikel/3e03a972eec5d0bf9e43dfc4f8059bba/ian-fairlie.html







Dr. Timothy A. Mousseau (http://www.biol.sc.edu/faculty/mousseau) / http://cricket.biol.sc.edu/chernobyl/Chernobyl_Research_Initiative/Introduction.htm

“Stress is not the cause of mental illnesses

1) increased oxidative stress and low levels of antioxidants

lead to:

2) normal development of the nervous system is jeopardized

leads to:

3) high frequencies of developmental errors


4) reduced brain size and impaired cognitive abilities in humans

leads to:

5) psychological effects”


Chernobyl birds have smaller brains: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3033907/


Read Full Post »