Fear and stress are not the problem! They are our last safeguarding! Against an invisible enemy: RADIATION
The nuclear industry helps irradiating and murdering Children, assisted by IAEA, WHO, ICRP, BEIR, UNSCEAR and local and national health authorities. With Cover Up, Dose Limits and Do not evacuate Policy.
Here is a belarusian Example: CORE / ETHOS Program:
= learn how to live in irradiated areas (no word about evacuation) & avoid stress (instead of radiation protection) & build industry, infra structure, accept the radiation, resettlement of people in contaminated areas <- instead of evacuation!
! This is PRO NUCLEAR!
“Even in the present, over one year after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster, there are restrictions on children playing outside in areas of Fukushima”
Of course it is. Children still live in irradiated areas and are massively more vunerable to it, than their parents. Children = Mitosis = faster cell division = FAST CANCER GROWTH & silent death
“their physical strength has declined greatly due to insufficient exercise and they are also experiencing mental stress.”
Is stress the problem? Or is a Cesium 137 radionuclide in their heart tissue the problem? A plutonium atom in the lungs? Strontium 90 in bones and teeth? Is stress really the problem?
Let’s quote nuclear industry’s best friend: Dr. Evil Yamashita: According to Dr. Yamashita Shunichi, you won’t be affected by radiation if you are smiling. He tested it with animals.” http://fukushima-diary.com/2012/02/the-chairman-of-japan-thyroid-association-is-yamashita-shunichi/
Yes! Smiling stopps decay times and the energy of radioactive atoms! What a shame of a doctor!
INSTEAD of evacuation millions stay in irradiated areas! And they SMILE! Thanks to wrond designed objectives. And falsification of reality.
How is this possible? IT IS IAEA POLICY!
“The fear of radiation is worse than the radiation.” Civil Society with it’s Fukushima NGOs will become a threat to the poitical level and hunted down like in Belarus. Make the people believe, that any other statement is panic and unobjective (The IAEA uses the word “Radiophobia” for Chernobyl) The IAEA calls it “Radiophobia”: http://www.iaea.org/inis/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/31/017/31017716.pdf – this is what Japan now uses for their anti radiation fear propaganda. The present and future victims are perceived as a disturbance to the atomic industry, to the japanese government, to the companies running atomic plants. They are going to end it. “If we continue to treat them like victims, they feel like victims,” quote by Zoya I. Trafimchik, coordinator of the CORE programme(above)
Japan kills NGO activity online: http://ajw.asahi.com/article/behind_news/social_affairs/AJ201311100027
quote “2. PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACTS OF NUCLEAR ACCIDENTS : Soon after the discovery of ionizing radiation, it was realized that radiation could harmfully affect skin tissues, body organs and the human body as a whole beside the genetic effects. Lately after the drop of the first atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki and also after Three-Miles-Island and Chernobyl accidents anew phenomenon described as RADIOPHOBIA have become apparent and widely spread..” PAGE 338.
1996 said the belarusian president Lukashenko during a meeting of the IAEA: “We encourage people to come back. We will open the shops again and enable the people to return to their evacuated towns and villages.” National statements were made by the President of Belarus, Mr. A. Lukashenko: http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Magazines/Bulletin/Bull383/box1.html and: http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/1996/inf510.shtml
“It is remarkable how reports always include “stress” / “fear” / “might” / “concern” / “risk” / “Danger” in their headlines and MAINgoals of reporting. The real damage occurring moves into the background. The dead, the injured, not worth looking at, only the concern counts. This is important, especially during nuclear catastrophes (which never end), to create the illusion of an “end”, to overcome the “current situation”. This is not about hope or strength, but to cover up, so that the Holocaust industry can live on. Nourished by the death of children, sponsored by the IAEA and the World Health Organization. I present you two instruments which are used: 1) The invention of an unethical, non-medical term: “Radiophobia” and 2) the exclusion of NGOs as alarmists. Compare everything you have read and seen with this information. Be ready to see everything in a totally new light. Even the term “stress” is today overused, for everything, as if stress is something new in human history and could be responsible for all the diseases. It’s not. Internal Emitters from Reactors are. Risk is a virtual term, which conceals existing, current, happening damage.” https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2013/06/02/incapacitation-and-protection-against-truth/
Stress is not the cause of mental illnesses
1) increased oxidative stress and low levels of antioxidants
2) normal development of the nervous system is jeopardized
3) high frequencies of developmental errors
4) reduced brain size and impaired cognitive abilities in humans
5) psychological effects
Children do not get allergies because they do not go out: 1) ionizing radiation leads to 2) genetic effects: “A mild mutation may express itself in humans as an allergy, asthma, juvenile diabetes, hypertension, arthritis, high blood cholesterol level, slight muscular or bone defects, or other genetic `mistakes’. These defects in genetic make-up leave the individual slightly less able to cope with ordinary stresses and hazards in the environment.” http://www.ratical.org/radiation/NRBE/NRadBioEffects.html
“It is widely known that irradiation not only causes specific reactions but also has «stress» component. Probably, like as specific reactions, «stress» reactions are connected with dosage and dose rate of irradiation.
However, while «dose-effect» dependencies are well enough studied for death of irradiated cells, for cell transformation, and for such injuries in DNA molecule as one- and two-thread breaks of DNA-protein joints etc., they are studied quite less for «radiation stress». http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Burlakova.pdf