Archive for March, 2011


More about Köhnlein: Nussbaum R. H. & Köhnlein W.: health consequences of exposure to ionizing radiation from external and internal sources: Challenges to radiation protection standards and biomedical research. Medicine and Global Survival Dec. 1995 Vol.2, No 4, pp 198-213.

The official website of the Radiation Effects Research Foundation JAPAN
IAEA and ICRP – Licence to Kill – ALARA principle

Read Full Post »


not only rain and waves, fish also. A 2nd catastrophe for Japan.

national meteorological and geophysical services in Austria LIVE MAP Cesium 137 release

Radiation Chart (probably down played and manipulated)

TEPCO radiation measurements – updated (probably down played and manipulated)

Quake and Radiation graphs

Readings at Monitoring Post out of 20 Km Zone of Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP (probably down played and manipulated)


Technical Briefing of nuclear safety aspects of the situation in Japan

Quake tracker Map Japan

Casualties (probably down played and manipulated)


Read Full Post »



If a reactor next to you crashes, what will happen? Who is going to compensate you? No reactor is insured.

There is something, it is called ALARA

In the beginning the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle was turned against the atomic industry. It said, that radiation exposure has to be held as low as possible, that means as low as rasonably achievable. But hydrogen bombs cause much radiation.

The ICRP Info HERE turned around this principle (after the first hydrogen bomb explosion in 1952) – so that the ALARA principle is now working FOR the atomic industry, even if a reactor crashes next to you. ICRP said, that ALARA does not refer to accidents. Basically this means:

When an accident happens (an atomic reactor crash, for example) the whole point of Status Quo is that the people are contaminated with radiation.

It was also renamed, it’s new name is “ALARP” (Source)

It simply doesn’t help the victims anymore, it helps the atomic industry and it’s profiteers: IAEA and ICRP

So, the atomic industry is spoken free, even during atomic accidents.

By the ALARA principle you have to prove that the money you are going to spent to lower the radiation exposure does advance peoples health. This was told the IAEA by the ICRP and so the IAEA told this all atomic agencies in the world. Funny thing, IAEA is not responsible for peoples health. And the IAEA does have a gag contract with the WHO since the 1950ies which does the WHO not allow to publish other numbers concerning radiation desease and death numbers, than those validated by the IAEA. And the IAEA ignores the link between desease / death and high / low radiation. Although it is proven.

Evidence HERE

Since 1929 genetic and cancer creating effects of radioactivity are known.
In 1946 Hermann J. Mueller got for his experiments the nobelprice:

So, more atomic power plants means: Less sorrow for the operators and the industry – if something happens. Now it’s understandable why money-printers / atomic power plants are not assured.

Do you know the ICRP? See HERE

They were originally founded in 1954. While their foundation was going on, an atmosphere of secrecy because of the atomic weapons and the secrecy of reasons of national safety were around them.

1954 ICRP was an organisation of 13 male members.  Till 1990 the first woman came to them…

They made the recommendations for radiation protection norms, which were accepted by all countries, and which (very important!) justified the set of regulations of the IAEA. Interesting isn’t it? Here is one:
ICRP said, the tritium emission (from atomic power plants) in water should be 40.000 Bq. And now the crazy progress of the ICRP: In 1990 they said: Lets make 7000 Bq/ litre. This was proved by ACES (Comitee for environmental standards). They said: Wrong housenumber, change the 7000 (Because of cancer danger). They also said: Lower it to 100 Bq in five years until you get 20 Bq / Litre.

I think its a big difference between 40.000 and 20, don’t you?

That’s why we should never tolerate a number for low radiation emission from atomic power plants.

But the IAEA uses them in a very cruel way, since the Chernobyl reactor explosion in 1986. If you read through a paper from 1990 (called “Document Nr. 60 1990), written by the ICRP you find the description

“temporary radiation effect”.

Effects which they did not find heavy enough in order that the effected people can be compensated. And today? Have a look at his HERE

ICRP totally gave up tp IAEA. IAEA is doing ICRP work today. And more: IAEA is selling the “peacefull atomic energy theory” worldwide. Although peaceful atomic reactos do develop low radiation (whose effects IAEA does try to deny) and weapon-ready Plutonium. It’s a BIG money game they are playing for decades and which will end hopefully soon (Uranium range: 60 years and below).

ICRP is NOT the organisation (in my opinion) which is in charge to protect the workers of the atomic industry. The ICRP does make down-the-lines and brings economic “imperative” into account. ICRP is not the advocator for radiation protection. Are there ICRP members who do have an apprenticeship in public health or industrial medicine?

ICRP members are profiteers of the atomic industry, just like the IAEA. Don’t expect to them to make radiation safety for YOU. This is an evidence that our modern society seems to have big problems.

There is also an other link, it’s called Principle of Subtantial Equivalentread about it HERE

IAEA is responsible for everything nuclear. It’s as if we choose the MAFIA as our Police to control the crimes.

Feeling safer – anyone?


Read Full Post »


They say: It’s below the normal limit.

But the normal limit is what you get everyday, without the atomic accident.

The atomic accident adds an additional dose to the normal dose.

This below the limit dose is added to the limit dose – both added = over the limit.

It also depends on what you get: Iodine 131, Cesium 137, Strontium are man made – your body is not adapted to them, neither does he know them.

The human body can not distinguish between the good potassium and cesium for example and let the cesium in, and saves it. CONSEQUENCES HERE

Not only that: Everytime the normal radiation dose is increased by IAEA and the health ministry by X, it means that eating X oranges means: I only eat one, and if I’m going sick because of that, it means that there must be another cause than oranges.

Japanese officals and WHO ignore irradiated Japanese Children

Fukushima: The IAEA strategy

Japan: Additional 252,500 Cancer Cases and Risk for pregnant women

25 Years with FUKUSHIMA

Atomic Industry – Licence to Kill

Read Full Post »


The Analogy proof:

Japanese officals and WHO ignore irradiated Japanese Children

Fukushima: The IAEA strategy

Japan: Additional 252,500 Cancer Cases and Risk for pregnant women


Atomic Industry – Licence to Kill


Read Full Post »


On  Dec. 11th 2008:

Gaddafi (lybian ruler) arrived in Paris, met Sarkozy.

Both countries signed a contract with a volume about 10,000,000,000 EUROs.

France was going to help Lybia to use atomic power.

France also wanted to deliver military equipment and a few atomic reactors.

On July 24th 2006 Lybia claimed to build an atomic bomb soon.

On July 27th 2007 Lybia and France announced cooperation on the atomic sector (SOURCE)

In the year 2003 Lybia stopped it’s development for producing Weapons of Mass Destruction.

With kind regards to Électricité de France. Don’t forget:

French atomic power plant: Worker contamined with radiation – again – Oct. 29th 2007 and

Électricité de France and the rising suicide rate in Chinon atomic power plant – July 8th 2007


Read Full Post »



On March 19th 2011, Gregory Härtl of the WHO told the world, that danger to human health around the 30 km zone is low. But the WHO has to do what the IAEA tells them. And the IAEA is a profiteer and left arm of the atomic industry. SOURCE

Send protests to him. Here is his adress:

Gregory Härtl
Team Leader, Communications for Global Alert and Response (GAR)
World Health Organization

Gregory Härtl was asked the following questions by a german Member of Parliament:

World Health Organization
Japan Nuclear Concerns

14 March 2011

Q: What is WHO’s role in nuclear emergencies?
Gregory Härtl: Within the United Nations system, the IAEA is the lead agency for coordination of international response to radiation events.
In accordance with its Constitution and the International Health Regulations, WHO is mandated to assess public health risks and Provide technical consultation and assistance in association with public health events, including those associated with radiation events.

Q: What is the Radiation Emergency Medical Preparedness and Assistance Network (REMPAN)?
Gregory Härtl: REMPAN WHO is a global network comprising more than 40 specialized institutions in radiation emergency medicine. It provides technical assistance for radiation emergency preparedness and response.

Q: What is the current risk in Japan to those near the reactor at the time, and those in other parts of Japan?
Gregory Härtl: Given that the amount of radiation released so far appears to be quite small, WHO believes that the public health risk is small.
In areas farther than 20km away from the Fukushima Daiichi and Daiini reactors, there is not assumed to be any Increased health risk to those who were there at the time of the explosion or to those who plan to be in those areas now.
The above assessment can change if there are further incidents at these plants, and the health consequences will depend on exposure. Exposure is in turn the amount of radiation released Dependant, weather conditions at the time of the explosion, the distance one is from the plans and the amount of time one is in irradiated areas.

CESIUM and STRONTIUM (HalfLife: 400 years) – released into the environment by TEPCO / FUKUSHIMA

Half-life is only so that half of the radiation is gone. You have every half-life multiplied by ten in order to have an idea when this radioisotope is gone from the biological environment. That would be in strontium and cesium 400 years.

national meteorological and geophysical services in Austria LIVE MAP Cesium 137 release

Latency: 20 – 25 years mature people / 1 – 4 years children (Chernobyl happens grows today, illness, death, cancer increase and not decrease, as WHO and IAEA say)

This is the upturned pyramid.

by Dr Dörte Siedentopf (IPPNW), Germany – i know her. This is an excerpt (SOURCE / IPPNW / PSR):

ENGLISH: http://fukushima-diary.com/2011/11/slow-death/#comment-41550
JAPANESE: http://vogelgarten.blogspot.com/2011/10/das-leise-sterben.html

Effect: The cesium is biological similar to the potassium and the human body can not distinguish between the good potassium and cesium.

The body takes it on the breath and the food. You can not protect yourself.

After intake, the cesium builds self into the body cells and destroys the energy balance of cells. It does not matter whether it consists of the liver, kidney or brain cells involved.

These infected cell dies, after she pulls even before their neighbors suffer.

June 4th 2011 – NEWS: Cesium in Tokio’s ground water: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-07-04/radioactive-cesium-is-found-in-tokyo-water.html

Thus begins a weird cycle:

How life begins with a cell starts in this case the death. Children are more vulnerable because their cells divide constantly.

As they grow, they need constant energy and constant need to cope with the damage to their cells.

LOW Radiation harms and kills – Evidence here: PETKAU EFFECT

25 years with Chernobyl:

The adults at that time have survived 25 years and are now ill. In about 4 years we’re going to see the same with japanese children.

Quiet Death.

The then children are already suffering much earlier – often with fatal consequences.

The cesium is present in the inheritance cells.

Precarious, is that the cesium implants in the ovaries and the eggs of women. Because renew their loans, they are damaged for life.

Although renewed in sperm, they also give more information to the injury during fertilization. Either, it can no longer be fathered children, or they get through father and mother misinformation in the future. The result you can not even imagine.

The authorities in Japan had long ago have put women and children in the south of the country. Why they did not is, in my view, totally incomprehensible. There will be massive leukemia. This cesium cloud is a disaster for the Japanese, and from all other radionuclides, we know nothing.

The body can not distinguish between Calcium and Strontium. If it is taken in through the food chain. It is built into the bones and teeth, shines there and hits the bone marrow, where sit the blood-forming organs: The stem cells that give rise to the red and white blood cells and platelets.

These cells are damaged by Strontium, and indeed a lifetime, because the strontium remains where it is: irradiating with short and beta radiation.


Six Fukushima liquidators were irradiated with 250 Millisievert on March 19th 2011 – after the radiation limit was increased to 250 Millisievert.  They got the radiation of 100 years! Thats the crone of irresponsibility. Atomic energy is a criminal energy against all kinds of life on the planet. And the IAEA got the peace noble prize in 2005.

Who decided to increase the limits? The health ministy of Japan? Or came the advise by the IAEA? The ICRP? Were medics actually involved? TEPCO by themself? Is this democratic? Or is it criminal?

THE IAEA and the WHO ignore this http://www.independentwho.info

Guideline by PSR

JAPAN INCREASED CHILDREN RADIATION LIMITS BY 2000 PERCENT: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/05/24/warning-japan-has-increased-radiation-limits-for-children-20-times-quiet-death/

20 milli sievert per hour (2000 percent increase for children) are 50 mammograms

Japanese Government -> Den Haag!

Fukushima: The IAEA strategy

Japan: Additional 252,500 Cancer Cases and Risk for pregnant women


Atomic Industry – Licence to Kill


Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 85 other followers