DNA Damage by CT Scanners: http://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2015/07/dna-damage-seen-in-patients-undergoing-ct-scanning-study-finds.html

Tiny studies cause Leukemia in nuclear workers: http://www.nature.com/news/researchers-pin-down-risks-of-low-dose-radiation-1.17876

The International Nuclear Workers Study (INWORKS): http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2015/07/06/ije.dyv122.extract



older news:

Radiation: Larger effect of small doses: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/09/02/radiation-larger-effect-of-small-doses/

ONE radiograph during pregnancy: 20 % increase for cancer probability before the child is 10 years old. Two radiographs during pregnancy: 28 %. Three: 70 %. FOUR:…. 100 PERCENT. There is NO SAFE LEVEL OF RADIATION EXPOSURE: http://books.google.de/books?id=aAoAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA30&lpg=PA30&dq=cancer+stewart+xray+1970+radiographs&source=bl&ots=UGZYt0TZGo&sig=ENE9wYZjjNs3Rh2XyptdZwP3Ucw&hl=de&ei=7545Tu6iF8aAOsLrvbMG&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&sqi=2&ved=0CBsQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false

radioactive iron Fe-59 given to 820 pregnant women (between 10th and 35th pregnancy week). The women knew nothing about it. Result: High malignancy rates in offspring: Acute lymphatic leukemia, synovial sarcoma, lymphosarcoma, primary liver carcinoma. http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/radiation/dir/mstreet/commeet/pm04/pl4brf/pl4brd.txt

PET / CT scanner. These are systems that simultaneously do (X-ray) computer tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) of a whole person. The PET is a nuclear medicine three-dimensional method in which positron emitters are used – mostly fluorine-18 – with a half-life of 1.8 hours (or full decay time of 18 hrs). For a single whole-body examination while the effective dose climbs to 10 millisieverts (mSv) for CT alone to 25 mSv. The organ doses are correspondingly: bone marrow 29 mSv, 27 mSv lung, ovary 33 mSv, 36 mSv intestine, stomach 29 mSv. For comparison, the threshold for the population at a nuclear power plant is 0.3 mSv (effective) per year for occupationally Exposed 20 mSv per year: http://www.strahlentelex.de/MedizinischeStrahlenbelastung.htm

Karl Morgan (director ICRP) “There is no safe level of exposure and there is no dose of radiation so low that the risk of a malignancy is zero”:  http://books.google.de/books?id=9-8EkIhxeK0C&pg=PA18&lpg=PA18&dq=%E2%80%9CThere+is+no+safe+level+of+exposure+and+there+is+no+dose+of+radiation+so+low+that+the+risk+of+a+malignancy+is+zero%E2%80%9D&source=bl&ots=GZXG5ZVK0i&sig=vVvf-pFUOPAPISPaBR5IWmVzlV8&sa=X&ei=AnUyUIq4L6Ss0QWtzoDgDA&ved=0CBQQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%E2%80%9CThere%20is%20no%20safe%20level%20of%20exposure%20and%20there%20is%20no%20dose%20of%20radiation%20so%20low%20that%20the%20risk%20of%20a%20malignancy%20is%20zero%E2%80%9D&f=false

The catastrophic genetic consequences of Low doses: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2014/01/05/the-catastrophic-genetic-consequences-of-low-doses/



From: http://static1.1.sqspcdn.com/static/f/356082/9624219/1291134934927/WS1_koerblein_Dose_response_ppt.pdf?token=ZxeP0DY3budkxvICxYqib2sakNI%3D

Is homosexuality / sex change a natural attempt / corollary of compensation by the disturbance of the sex ratio by nuclear power?

Millions Fewer Girls Born: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2011/06/110602-millions-fewer-girls-nuclear-radiation-births-science

The gender gap in 1987 – 2007 (Chernobyl gender gap) corresponds to approximately 440 000 theoretical missing female births when only the female sex was affected. If also male births were affected at a ratio of male: female = 3:10, is the gender gap by about 790 000 (180 000 +610 000) male + female births PAGE 32 http://www.tschernobylkongress.de/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/ScherbVoigt_fehlbildungen_fehlende_geburten.pdf

the human sex ratio at birth in several European countries before and after the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant accident was investigated. A long-term chronic impact of radioactive fallout on the secondary sex ratio has been found http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/env.958/abstract;jsessionid=69E27384F9B8CCE48A54AADC6FDA0606.d02t03

Wolff used X-Rays to produce Intersexuality, or an effect of radiation causes a change in hormon balance (as seen in the thyroid gland -> Iodine 131), and so, Intersexuality is caused. http://books.google.de/books?id=9ZUsXdsX57cC&pg=PA265&lpg=PA265&dq=%C3%89tienne+Wolff+intersexuality&source=bl&ots=ZyTgkEq1pu&sig=NNCFNCDYeS3Vw9nXtFM0m8jgJP0&hl=en#v=onepage&q=%C3%89tienne%20Wolff%20intersexuality&f=false and: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15906220

embryonic cells are radiosensitive during the morphogenetic phases (1924. 1925, 1928) and radiation causes omphalocephalic chick embryos: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=0CCYQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ijdb.ehu.es%2Fweb%2Fcontents.php%3Fvol%3D34%26issue%3D1%26doi%3D2203449&ei=gck4UK6_N-qn0QXPyYGgDw&usg=AFQjCNEdBmUO_FTQeuzIQA4D1JzhZ1EcGg

The atmospheric atomic bomb test fallout affected the human sex odds at birth overall, and the Chernobyl fallout had a similar impact in Europe and parts of Asia. The birth sex odds near nuclear facilities are also distorted. The persistently disturbed secular human sex odds trends allow the estimation of the global deficit of births in the range of several millions. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21336635

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9039384 The human sex odds at birth after the atmospheric atomic bomb tests, after Chernobyl, and in the vicinity of nuclear facilities http://www.springerlink.com/content/q15h473440512601/

A positive association of the male proportion in Germany between 1986 and 1991 with radioactive exposure at the district level is reflected by a sex odds ratio of 1.0145 per mSv/a These findings suggest a possible long-term chronic influence of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant accident on the human sex odds at birth in several European countries. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17482426

Low Dose News


“Diagnoses of cancers were identified from the Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry. A two-fold higher risk for leukaemia and brain tumours was seen among children exposed to dose rates of ≥200 nSv/h compared to those exposed to .” http://www.ispm.ch/index.php?id=377&no_cache=1&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=1585



Impressions from:

25 years of German-Belarusian Chernobyl Civil Movement June 18 till 21 – 2015

background: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2015/04/27/25-years-of-german-belarusian-chernobyl-civil-movement-june-18-till-21-2015/

rwi rwh   rwe rwd rwc rwg rwb rwa

Media Report: http://www.schwarzwaelder-bote.de/inhalt.rottweil-ein-jubilaeum-mit-traurigem-hintergrund.b125ca08-7f57-48ef-8d6f-7c931e223d21.html


NOT A MELTDOWN NOT A MELT THROUGH! The violence of the explosion would have been massive, if they had not vented Reactor 2.

The pressure building up in the building destroyed it then, also in Unit 1 and Unit 2, and probably Unit 3. Info by Japanese Atomic Energy Commission JAEC, May 24th 2011, 16th meeting: March 14th 6:22 pm – 2号機全燃料 露出 = Ejection of ALL fuel from Reactor 2, 6:22pm March 14 2011:

The Nuke Club


It’s a Set up. Clever, brilliant, murderous intent.

What’s wrong with ETHOS Fukushima and their nuclear daddies:


What’s wrong with the World Health Organisation and the IAEA:



Since 1990 exists a close partnership between the “citizens’ initiative for a world without nuclear threat” in Rottweil and the Belarusian Foundation “The Children of Chernobyl”  in which they stand in solidarity to help remembering the Chernobyl disaster and build the energy future without nuclear energy.

There is a partnership festival from June 18 to 21 – 2015. This partnership will be held with a variety of events and with guests from Belarus and Japan.

They have supported this German-Belarusian partnership,, designed it, so we would like to celebrate it with you also.

Please book your accommodation in the hostel or the Tourist Information. http://www.rottweil.de

Info about City here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rottweil

15cib 15cia

The fund helped more than 2000.000 belarusians with concrete aid and sent more than 360,000 Chernobyl children in countries all over the world, was nominated for the peace nobel prize 2005. MORE INFO IN THESE TWO LINKS:

Prof. Dr. Gennady Grushevoy – Геннадий Грушевой: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2014/01/28/prof-dr-gennady-grushevoy
VIDEOS of the fund and the NGO:

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 100 other followers