The wheel of the second Evolution

You see a wheel that rotates. It is the wheel of four billion years old evolution. The outer wheel. Of a circle.
The next wheel in the circle shows us the natural radiation. The second circle of the wheel shows the mutations.
These two circles rotate in unison. Although there are different circuits, but they rotate together.
The nearest, innermost circle shows the artificial radiation. This turns just since the nuclear age.

And this turns the mutation loop also.
The innermost circle is covered

And everyone thinks that the speed of the second has always been to match the outer circle.

A line is the development
A second parallel line is the radiation
Both show time: time of development (mutation), time of radiation.
If I now also give in radiation, from reactors, it seems the development needs to catch up.
If I give in additional radiation, there is an additional mutation.
Radiation apes. It leads to that nature reacts.
If I give in finely dosed radiation, which would be expected in 10 years (10 to 20 milli Sievert additional one per year), then there is correspondingly more deaths and mutations, namely the next ten years. Namely earlier. Not everything in the same year, and not in all infants (some are just not born). But maybe in the next decade, or generation – there is then also the regular cases that remain. The higher rate is interpreted by experts through falsification of history by means of statistics – they will fail and do strategic misinterpretation.

If some die, and not procreate – that is the end of their existance, of the DNA code. It’ll never comes back. As if it never existed.

What is reality? That’s what I wonder.
What we are. So the answer is.
What are we? Change.
How do we measure it? With time, with various kinds of states within the time.
So and so many sick people, so and so much healthy ones.
This figure, this ratio is valid for a period.
Within the period. That’s reality.
Within a period of one year, there are, let’s say, 1,000 lightning strikes. 100 reach the ground, a person dies. Because not all people are, where lightning strikes. So 1,000 flashes are normally in one year. The default value, death is real, is normal. Now I will again produce 1,000 flashes, the same year. Thus, there are 8 deaths. So 8 times as much, or 800% more. There are supposed to be only 2, so 1 more. But these flashes have a special feature: tehy penetrate the body, and remain as a energy there. Making further damage. But I only observe one year. And I only compare flash with flash, no matter if man made or natural. Inner effects in the body, I don’t care. But the 8 deaths in the same year remain. Next year 16 suddenly die even if no additional lightning were sent in. Henceforth 16 become normally. The accumulation is attributed to betterlightning death diagnostics”.
Is this the Reality?
In short: If I give in more radiation that is as if I turn the wheel of time faster, only slightly, and thus accelerating the development.
And this development is called: Selection. Or: Nuclear Darwinism.

Pour 200 milli Siever into humanity, and you give them in the next generations the degeneration of 200 years, at once.


What is milli Sievert, what are doeses?

Depends on who gets it, and where- in the glands, the lungs, the DNA. Who can say? It is a mess.
Who gets it? Children, pregnant women, fetuses?
Where is the nuclear atom, for who knows how long and gives it’s energy, causes the damage, and how and where to in the body is the damage passed on to.
All this Rem, Sievert or Roentgen – the designations do not consider it,

What is cancer? A disease? Only? Or is it a MUTATION.

Only after these 200 years, the generations born – who is then there too see the connection with an old crime? An invisible crime it is. People are only concerned with somatic factors, triggering genetically programmed malignancy. The first one we can see. A deadly mistake that we have started since the beginning of the nuclear age. Splitting of the atom means altering the DNA.

If a severely disabled child is born this can be the result of genes – over many many generations, OR, for example from the last generation genes, altered by radiation. Our DNA is oxygen, hydrogen, nitrogen, carbon. Reactors emit ionizing radioactive atoms, Emit tritium mimicing hydrogen, emitting carbon 14. It is our DNA. And the loss a single reactor inventory means the emissions of 1,000 uranium atomic bombs an 40 plutonium atomic bombs.

And so throbs a heart in each of the reactors. In slow motion, invisible to the viewer, and yet emitting radioativity just below the speed of light. Camouflaged effects by the slowness of the generations. Only in comparison it is visible, but who compares? This knowledge includes no wisdom, is always being updated. Better diagnosis conceals the change.

Controlled chain reaction. This is meant with “decelerated atomic bombs”, so called reactors. The ray shocks were the  2000 bomb blasts in the last decades, by above ground testing. Here the genetic material of the human race has been changed. Many new diseases saw the light of the day. At the same time better diagnostics. Which is partly only obfuscation.

We misunderstand everything. The diseases and mutations are only sypmtoms of the variation in the DNA by artificial radiation. The natural radiation background radiation is external, mostly. The artificial emitters are in the food, get to body cells and DNA forming genomic changes, which are triggered somatically. The four billion perpetual evolution does not know these “substances”, and builds them in as benign.

That is reality. And not the dream world we live in. The knowledge burns the imagination


Who gives in radiation, turns the wheel of time faster, and multiplies and accelerates the development. This is the “rapid aging” phenomena we have in our people, in children also. Why are there cancers in children, which were found in older times only in old people? Because Four-year-old children are older than Four-year-old children.

The changes begin insidiously. Who comes today severely disabled to the world, whose DNA was altered through generations or was teratogenic changed by substances or radiation, or whose parents...
The many disorders of the mind and mood, are sign of a boiling point in the future where there will be a mass extinction within the human race. It starts only slightly, just by this interference. Mental disorders only symptoms of Development.

Such a degenerated humanity must be controlled externally (by controlling, Quality Management, company and civil processes, key performance indicators for everyone and everything) and internal control (psychotropics, drugs, when do I feel what / what do I think) be controlled towards a moldable material to a million / billion-strong army of addicts who only will provide slave labor. Only work at all to get drugs (symptoms blocking)  and other means (euthanasia) to alleviate their suffering.

Symbol and Simulation become reality.

This is thrilled applauded by a crowd who doesn’t want to know a thing about the backgrounds, and is trained by medication anyway. The words are killed by controlling and imagination power is killed by education and care. In addition, they lack the opportunities of comparison, because there is always only one present, generated by constant updates (strategic Misintepretation by experts and students).

That’s why people also believe that there are more cases only through better diagnostics – ergo that never anything changes anything, that things are always harmonious. And the rest just is just fear mongering and panic makers and a lot of “could”, which – must be overcome – as prescribed. By positive thinking and “changing life style”

This form of fascism engages directly into the DNA, and forms the basic thinking, and makes absolutely every exit and opposition impossible, because there are simply no alternatives.

Acting now, is too early to act later, is impossible.
During this 200 to 300 years of operation, the numbers are rising of all mutations, such as autism, dementia, diabetes, cancer, infertility, sterility, and thin the ranks among us to destroy and opposition, and to generate fear (just don’t say anything, so I can get my drug – later I can’t even imagine a thing) ,

That’s the reality.

That is the Nuclear Darwinism.

Better medical care does not mean a bright future, the evolutions phases out each disturbance: ““H.J. Muller estimated that the genetic load accumulated in 8 human generations (∼ 240 years) living under constantly improving medical services with zero mortality rate due to natural selective forces is equivalent to that acquired in a single exposure to 200roentgen (1,8 Sievert) of gamma radiation 2 kilometers from Ground Zero in Hiroshima.”  https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2015/09/22/the-radiation-generation/

1) NATURE ELIMINATES MUTATIONS. The Nuclear Industry uses this LATENCY Weapon against us, to create Dependence in Future.

2) Accordingly, the great majority of mutations, certainly well over 99%, are harmful .” Herman J Mueller – father of modern genetics. Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1946

3) The Increase in diseases and genetic defects is the new normal. And the accelerated evolution means we are NOT advanced, We will get older faster, and NOT be older. Each genetic benefit is an accident, NOT an adaptive response.

We each carry a load  of about four serious faults  in our DNA. We are saved from fourfold incapacitation by covering most of these faults with a normal gene from our parents.”

Radiation exposure is an inevitable side-effect of our atomic energy programs, as well as of medical X-rays and of our natural environment. The Atomic Energy Commission (AEC = NRC) standards of permissible exposure (about 30 times larger than the level we experience now from atomic energy activities) would increase the natural rate of mutation about 10 percent. Over a period of generations the health costs of these additional mutations would be about $10 billion a year. This estimate and its probable uncertainty by a factor of 10 either way, needs to be factored into the economics of energy production and, more immediately, into the cost-effectiveness of the genetic research needed to plan on a basis of scientific certainty. Most of the atomic-energy related costs might even be canceled if we made sufficient efforts now to develop the countermeasures.” Government Is Most Dangerous of Genetic Engineers , Washington Post 1970 – by Joshua Lederberg – 1958 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. http://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/ps/access/BBABXZ.pdf


quote from Fukushima-Diary.com

“Mass media reported Reactor 2 has almost no fuel inside / 6 months later than the first academic report”

previous post: http://fukushima-diary.com/2015/03/nagoya-uni-significantly-small-amount-of-fuel-remaining-in-reactor-2-no-announcement-about-underground-situation/


Gregory Jaczko was informed about the venting of TEPCO reactors in the NRC document ML12052A099.pdf. What did he know, what did he do? Venting reactor containment means letting it fly – to the people. THIS is NOT a meltdown. The reactors are empty. Scanner pics of TEPCO show this. How can this be a meltdown? http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1205/ML12052A099.pdf

SORCA = MACCS2: “Accident Consequence Analysis Code: The computer code used to calculate dispersion of radioactive material to the environment and the population.” http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/research/safetycodes.html

nrc-vent4 nrc-vent3 nrc-vent2 nrc-vent1

Ventilating or Exploding: Each Reactor Architecture must lose Radioactive Inventory: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2015/04/07/ventilating-or-exploding-each-reactor-architecture-must-lose-radioactive-inventory/


The radiation-generation


It was Muller, who brought the Atomic Darwinism indirectly into the light of awarness:

“H.J. Muller estimated that the genetic load accumulated in 8 human generations (∼ 240 years) living under constantly improving medical services with zero mortality rate due to natural selective forces is equivalent to that acquired in a single exposure to 200roentgen (1,8 Sievert) of gamma radiation 2 kilometers from Ground Zero in Hiroshima.” http://arxiv.org/pdf/1301.4299.pdf

chernobyl-clock Safe-Murder

All quotes are from:

Our load of mutations by H.J. Muller: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1716299/

And since the death rate is a kind of index of the total damage which the gene occasions, it also follows that, paradoxically, the grade of detriment caused by a gene in the average individual in which it manifests itself is not correlated with the total amount of damage it does in the entire population.

More recently, without at the time being aware of Haldane’s approach to this particular point, the present writer gave a statement of it in terms of the individual mutation, noting that each detrimental mutant gene, no matter how slight its phenotypic effect, produces, on the average, one eventual half-death of a zygote, or what may be termed one genome-death, when it acts as a recessive in causing elimination, and one complete zygote death, i.e. two genome deaths, when acting as a dominant

The use of ionizing radiation and of radioactive materials is increasing and promises to continue increasing to such an extent, both in medical treatment and diagnosis, and in commerce and industry, even without considering military affairs in this connection, that unless more caution is exercised than at present the majority of the population may in each successive generation have its gonads exposed to enough radiation to raise. the mutation rate by a significant amount, such as 25% or 50%

Yet despite the fact that the evidence of a short-term rise in mutation rate is so hidden, the total amount of damage caused to all. later generations by even a moderate rise, confined to one parental generation, would if gathered together be seen to be enormous. Thus only a 25% rise in mutation rate for one generation would, in a population of 100,000,000 per generation whose usual spontaneous rate was only 1 mutant gene in 10 germ cells, cause the eventual “genetic death” of 5,000,000 individuals, scattered throughout scores of generations. It would probably cause, in addition, hundreds of millions to be slightly more afflicted than they would otherwise have been, i.e. to have their viability lowered by an average of some 2 or 3%. These effects are hidden only because distributed over so many generations and because so intermingled with those of other factors. Moreover, once the mutations have been produced, they will take their eventual toll despite all counteracting measures that may hereafter be instituted, short of a consciously directed selection.


Thus, in a population of 100,000,000, a rise of mutation rate of only 0.025, confined to just one generation, would in the course of centuries result in 5,000,000 genetically caused extinctions, and in a vastly greater number of individuals who were detrimentally affected to a slight extent.

Thus, if an average of 100 r were applied to the germ cells of the whole population for an indefinitely long period and finally lowered the equilibrium fitness by 10%, then the application of 100 r to just one generation would have a total genetic effect equivalent to the lowering of the average fitness of exactly one whole generation by, 10% (implying with this an increment of 10% in its genetic deaths). Actually, however, these 10%0 of deaths and these forty (i) times as numerous slight shortcomings would be diluted by being spread out over scores of generations. If then we knew this relationship we should have to put the further question: would the benefits of applying just these particular practices, rather than such substitutes or modifications of them as would nothave thisgenetic effect, be worth so large a price?

We see then that although there is some possibility that the studies in Japan may obtain evidence of the induction of mutations, it is certainly premature to say, as some persons have done, that they will afford a definitive test of the genetic effectiveness of radiation in man. Assertions have in fact been made that if positive results are not found there, this will have a salutary influence in quieting public fears concerning the genetic dangers of radiation. It should therefore be reiterated that existing knowledge is not only enough now to make it more likely that no definitely positive effects will be found than that they will, but also enough to make it quite sure that such failure to obtain positive results would not give valid support for the view, thus far based only on wishful thinking, that the amount of effect is insignificant.


It might be imagined however that the average person would be very unlikely to receive a dose of radiation great enough to raise the mutation rate by 0.025. But it takes a total dose of only about 50 r, when applied to the immature germ cells of Drosophila, to cause this much rise, and only 25 r when applied to mature germ cells. Moreover, the data from mice, although entirely too scanty, do indicate so far as they go that the induced mutation rate in mammals is of the same order of magnitude as in Drosophila. Now 50 r is an amount of radiation that a person’s gonads are not at all unlikely to receive under modern conditions. And the use of radiation is increasing in so many ways that, within a few decades, people whose gonads have not been exposed to this much total radiation, in the entire period from their conception to the time they reproduce, may be comparatively rare. A single fluoroscopic “screening” has been estimated to deliver to the skin about 75′ r, on the average (Martin, 1947), and’although but a fraction of this reaches the gonads it would not take very many such examinations to deliver 50 r to them. Again, an increasing number of women are having their ovaries deliberately treated with 300 r for the purpose of rupturing refractory Graafian follicles, i.e. to induce’ovulation (see for instance Haman, 1947), and the practice of having the testes treated with 500 r for the purpose of delaying the possibility of conception for several years is said to be increasing in popularity among men.

As yet,-there is much resistance to such measures when they are proposed. Indeed, even the “permissible level” of 0.3 r per week which has recently become commonly recognized (but not so commonly followed), and which repre-‘ sents a considerably more cautious standard than the long-accepted “tolerance’ dose” of 0.1 r per day that preceded it, would allow 15 r a year. Hence it would allow delivery of 50 r in the course of only three’ and a third years.

Moreover, since, as previously explained, the human mutation rate is probably not far from its critical level, even mild influences may turn out to be of more significance than has been suspected, in relation to the mutational load of mankind.

For example, if 100 r, applied as an average to a whole populations indefinitely, causes a 10%o lowering of average fitness and a corresponding 10% increment of genetic deaths, then this 100 r applied to the germ cells of just one individual who will later reproduce by an average amount will cause, again on the average, a total lowering of fitness of his descendants equal to the lowering of fitness of one descendant by 010%, and will, correspondingly, give a 10% risk of one genetic extinction, occurring at some unknown point in his line of succession. Nevertheless, if we have thereby raised the level of life of the exposed individual himself to such a degree that the effect, when averaged out over his own lifetime, would amount to more than 10%o, then we were in fact justified-provided we could not have attained this benefit by means that were safer for his descendants. And the same kind of considerations must be the guide in decisions concerning whether or not a given individual should undertake reproduction, when he is known to have certain genetic shortcomings.

Nevertheless, they are numerous enough to be collectively important, in the great majority of individuals, and, untreated, they must lead to the “genetic death,” or extinction, of a sizeable proportion-at least some 20%, to be conservative, of the population. On the other hand, if these weaknesses are mitigated or “cured” and in consequence proceed to perpetuate themselves to a greater degree than before, they must eventually, after very many generations, result in a new equilibrium, in which the population harbors and is being treated for correspondingly more of them than before, and in which there is again, despite all these treatments, just as large a proportion meeting genetic extinction as there was originally. At the same time, the amount of genetically caused suffering short of extinction will also have become comparable with what it had been originally

On the basis of existing data in man, supported by evidence from Drosophila, the total human mutation rate is judged to be probably not less than one newly arisen mutant gene in 10 germ cells, on the average, and not more than one in 2 germ cells.

My thoughts: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2014/04/14/nuclear-energy-programs-the-genetic-wipeout-in-10-generations/



DNA Damage by CT Scanners: http://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2015/07/dna-damage-seen-in-patients-undergoing-ct-scanning-study-finds.html

Tiny studies show: Leukemia caused in nuclear workers: http://www.nature.com/news/researchers-pin-down-risks-of-low-dose-radiation-1.17876

The International Nuclear Workers Study (INWORKS): http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2015/07/06/ije.dyv122.extract



older news:

Radiation: Larger effect of small doses: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/09/02/radiation-larger-effect-of-small-doses/

ONE radiograph during pregnancy: 20 % increase for cancer probability before the child is 10 years old. Two radiographs during pregnancy: 28 %. Three: 70 %. FOUR:…. 100 PERCENT. There is NO SAFE LEVEL OF RADIATION EXPOSURE: http://books.google.de/books?id=aAoAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA30&lpg=PA30&dq=cancer+stewart+xray+1970+radiographs&source=bl&ots=UGZYt0TZGo&sig=ENE9wYZjjNs3Rh2XyptdZwP3Ucw&hl=de&ei=7545Tu6iF8aAOsLrvbMG&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&sqi=2&ved=0CBsQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false

radioactive iron Fe-59 given to 820 pregnant women (between 10th and 35th pregnancy week). The women knew nothing about it. Result: High malignancy rates in offspring: Acute lymphatic leukemia, synovial sarcoma, lymphosarcoma, primary liver carcinoma. http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/radiation/dir/mstreet/commeet/pm04/pl4brf/pl4brd.txt

PET / CT scanner. These are systems that simultaneously do (X-ray) computer tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) of a whole person. The PET is a nuclear medicine three-dimensional method in which positron emitters are used – mostly fluorine-18 – with a half-life of 1.8 hours (or full decay time of 18 hrs). For a single whole-body examination while the effective dose climbs to 10 millisieverts (mSv) for CT alone to 25 mSv. The organ doses are correspondingly: bone marrow 29 mSv, 27 mSv lung, ovary 33 mSv, 36 mSv intestine, stomach 29 mSv. For comparison, the threshold for the population at a nuclear power plant is 0.3 mSv (effective) per year for occupationally Exposed 20 mSv per year: http://www.strahlentelex.de/MedizinischeStrahlenbelastung.htm

Karl Morgan (director ICRP) “There is no safe level of exposure and there is no dose of radiation so low that the risk of a malignancy is zero”:  http://books.google.de/books?id=9-8EkIhxeK0C&pg=PA18&lpg=PA18&dq=%E2%80%9CThere+is+no+safe+level+of+exposure+and+there+is+no+dose+of+radiation+so+low+that+the+risk+of+a+malignancy+is+zero%E2%80%9D&source=bl&ots=GZXG5ZVK0i&sig=vVvf-pFUOPAPISPaBR5IWmVzlV8&sa=X&ei=AnUyUIq4L6Ss0QWtzoDgDA&ved=0CBQQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%E2%80%9CThere%20is%20no%20safe%20level%20of%20exposure%20and%20there%20is%20no%20dose%20of%20radiation%20so%20low%20that%20the%20risk%20of%20a%20malignancy%20is%20zero%E2%80%9D&f=false

The catastrophic genetic consequences of Low doses: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2014/01/05/the-catastrophic-genetic-consequences-of-low-doses/



From: http://static1.1.sqspcdn.com/static/f/356082/9624219/1291134934927/WS1_koerblein_Dose_response_ppt.pdf?token=ZxeP0DY3budkxvICxYqib2sakNI%3D

Is homosexuality / sex change a natural attempt / corollary of compensation by the disturbance of the sex ratio by nuclear power?

Millions Fewer Girls Born: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2011/06/110602-millions-fewer-girls-nuclear-radiation-births-science

The gender gap in 1987 – 2007 (Chernobyl gender gap) corresponds to approximately 440 000 theoretical missing female births when only the female sex was affected. If also male births were affected at a ratio of male: female = 3:10, is the gender gap by about 790 000 (180 000 +610 000) male + female births PAGE 32 http://www.tschernobylkongress.de/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/ScherbVoigt_fehlbildungen_fehlende_geburten.pdf

the human sex ratio at birth in several European countries before and after the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant accident was investigated. A long-term chronic impact of radioactive fallout on the secondary sex ratio has been found http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/env.958/abstract;jsessionid=69E27384F9B8CCE48A54AADC6FDA0606.d02t03

Wolff used X-Rays to produce Intersexuality, or an effect of radiation causes a change in hormon balance (as seen in the thyroid gland -> Iodine 131), and so, Intersexuality is caused. http://books.google.de/books?id=9ZUsXdsX57cC&pg=PA265&lpg=PA265&dq=%C3%89tienne+Wolff+intersexuality&source=bl&ots=ZyTgkEq1pu&sig=NNCFNCDYeS3Vw9nXtFM0m8jgJP0&hl=en#v=onepage&q=%C3%89tienne%20Wolff%20intersexuality&f=false and: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15906220

embryonic cells are radiosensitive during the morphogenetic phases (1924. 1925, 1928) and radiation causes omphalocephalic chick embryos: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=0CCYQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ijdb.ehu.es%2Fweb%2Fcontents.php%3Fvol%3D34%26issue%3D1%26doi%3D2203449&ei=gck4UK6_N-qn0QXPyYGgDw&usg=AFQjCNEdBmUO_FTQeuzIQA4D1JzhZ1EcGg

The atmospheric atomic bomb test fallout affected the human sex odds at birth overall, and the Chernobyl fallout had a similar impact in Europe and parts of Asia. The birth sex odds near nuclear facilities are also distorted. The persistently disturbed secular human sex odds trends allow the estimation of the global deficit of births in the range of several millions. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21336635

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9039384 The human sex odds at birth after the atmospheric atomic bomb tests, after Chernobyl, and in the vicinity of nuclear facilities http://www.springerlink.com/content/q15h473440512601/

A positive association of the male proportion in Germany between 1986 and 1991 with radioactive exposure at the district level is reflected by a sex odds ratio of 1.0145 per mSv/a These findings suggest a possible long-term chronic influence of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant accident on the human sex odds at birth in several European countries. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17482426

Low Dose News


“Diagnoses of cancers were identified from the Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry. A two-fold higher risk for leukaemia and brain tumours was seen among children exposed to dose rates of ≥200 nSv/h compared to those exposed to .” http://www.ispm.ch/index.php?id=377&no_cache=1&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=1585



Impressions from:

25 years of German-Belarusian Chernobyl Civil Movement June 18 till 21 – 2015

background: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2015/04/27/25-years-of-german-belarusian-chernobyl-civil-movement-june-18-till-21-2015/

rwi rwh   rwe rwd rwc rwg rwb rwa

Media Report: http://www.schwarzwaelder-bote.de/inhalt.rottweil-ein-jubilaeum-mit-traurigem-hintergrund.b125ca08-7f57-48ef-8d6f-7c931e223d21.html


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 101 other followers