Posts Tagged ‘UNSCEAR’
Posted in Uncategorized, tagged Anti-Nuclear-Power Consumers Group with TEPCO, Association of parents for the safe and relieved environment of Fukushima University, “No More Nanjing” Association, “Sayonara Genpatsu! Mitaka Action” Jikkoiinkai, Campaign for Nuclear-free Japan, Chiyodaku Kodomo Mamoru Kai, Chominritsukankyo Network Ooiso, Citizens’ Radioactivity Measuring Station, Civil Society, FoE Japan, Fukushima Daigaku Genpatsu Saigai Sien Forum, Fukushima Ken Shizen Hogo Kyokai, Fukushima no Kodomo Tachitotomoni Setagaya no Kai, Genpatsu Yameyou Tsunagarou Kansai Madamu Kaigi, Greens Japan, Group Mirai, Hairo Action Fukushima, Hamelnproject, Hinan Shien Net Kanagawa, Hinan Sien Net Kanagawa, Hisaishasien wo kangaeru kai Koube, Honmoku Senior EX, Honmoku Senior IT Club, Houshasen hibaku wo Gakushu suru Kai, Housyanou kara Kodomo wo Mamorou Kanto Net, Human Rights, IAEA, IAEO, Inochi Mirai Ube, Inter-faith Forum for Review of National Nuclear Policy, Izuminomori, Kaburaya, Kafuka no Kai, Kaminoseki Genpatsu no Nekko wo Miru Kai, Kazashimo No Kai Fukushima, Kodomo no Mirai wo Mamoru Kai Ikoma, Kodomotachi no Mirai to Kankyo wo Kangaeru Kai Hyogo, Kurashi no Shizen Kankyo Joho Shitsu, Large flowers of hope projects, Make Our Way, Midori Fukushima, Mirai to Inochi wo Mamoru Kai, Mirai to Inochi wo Mamoru Kai Sensyu, Mori no koya, Nagoya, Nasunogahara Residents’ Association for Radiation Protection, National Network of Parents to Protect Children from Radiation, Network Asunowa, Niji To Midori No Kai, Nishiyashiki, NO NUKES from Shiga, Nonukes Ibaraki, nuclear, Oracle itami, Osaka Seimei Kankyo Communitas, Peace and Environmental Advocacy for the Child, Project 47, Protect Kids from Radiation – Setagaya, Radiation, reactor, Safety Project, Stop Genpatsu no Kai, STOP Nuclear Plants BEFORE Huge Quake Strikes, Takagi School, Tewotunagu3.11 Shisyu, The Civil Forum on Damages of Nuclear Radiation, The meeting of the lee which prevents an earthquake disaster with nuclear accident, Toshima Hosyanou kara kodomo wo mamoru kai, UNSCEAR, Wakayama Housyanou Gareki kara Inochi wo Mamoritai Iinkai, WHO, Workers’ Executive Committee For Anti-nuclear Power Movements, Yoshikawa-sukoyaka Net, Zensekiyu Showa-Shell Labor Union on November 19, 2013 | Leave a Comment »
“The Rapporteur criticizes the use of “cost-benefit analysis” made by the Japanese authorities (following the ICRP recommendations) since such analysis does not respect the fundamental right to health of individuals.”
World Health Organisation ignores health of irradiated people: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/05/27/margaret-chan-versus-world-health-organisation/
this is the ICRP (pro nuclear commission) risk assessment (http://www.icrp.org/publication.asp?id=ICRP+Publication+22) on page 14/15 they say The commission discussed the application of risk assessments to estimate the actual cases of disease that can result from a given radiation exposure of individuals or populations (…) One way to improve the usefulness of risk estimates, is to express them as damage measurement in monetary terms… Several authors have already performed such calculations and indicate the cost per person, and “rem” (1 rem = 10 mSv) to 10 to 250 US dollars. (ICRP publication 22 1973)
BEIR 1972 page 69 / 70: Created by the National Academy of Sciences: suffering is “converted” in dollars. In the 1970ies the annual health care costs per capita in the U.S. estimated at $ 400 lump sum for medical expenses, based on $ 80 billion for medical expenses in 1970 (200 million citizens). Mr. Lederberg (BEIR) said that when allowed 1.7 mSv per year (mSv for nuclear workers 50 / a) is increased in 30 years, the total level of disease in the U.S.increases by 0.5 to 5%. 10 mSv increase 0.1 to 1%. In 30 years (one generation) causes $ 12,000 per head (30 x $ 400). 10 mSv per generation would result in 10-120 dollars costs (0.1 to 1% of 12,000 dollars).
How much does a cancer drug? 10.000, $ 20.000? Genetic defects are not considered.
BEIR 1972 still assumed it will come to more than 6.2 deaths per 100 people when irradiated with 1 sievert, the same panel twenty years later, already figured at 12.4 cancer deaths. ICRP has confirmed in 1966 that natural radiation is harmful! ICRP Publication Number 8 from 1966 on page 60. in relation to the health damage caused by natural radiation for the bulk of the world’s population is a risk of sixth order (1 to 10 dead per million per rad / gray) in a few areas with high natural background radiation the risk fifth order. 10 to 100 dead per million and rad (gray). and in 1977 the ICRP publication number 26 said, that, in this sense, regional differences of the natural radiation are so regarded, that the corresponding differences include the damage. and in the ’80s the natural radiation was simply doubled. and in 2011 it became the twentyfold in japan: 20 mSv/a. Natural radiation is used as an excuse to increase artificial radiation with radionuclide-antagonists.
They call that radiation-protection!
1971: the discoverer of plutonium and president of the USAEC (“protects” health and advertises nuclear industry at the same time, later AEC, then NRC) Glenn Theodore Seaborg resigns – at the same time the ICRP reduced the the additional maximum dose near reactors for the public from 500 mrem/annual (5 mSv/a) to 5 mrem/annual (0,05 mSv/a). Thanks to Prof. Ernest Sternglass and his studies about infant mortality near reactors;: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/inetSeries/ejs1192.html
MORE about IAEA, ICRP, BEIR, UNSCEAR – the nuclear hitman: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/Chernobyl/
Prepare yourself with this ultimate summary:
in japanese & english!
A PROBLEM OF LOW DOSE EFFECTS:
The Inadequacy of the Official Concept of Radiation Safety
Russian Academy of Science, Moscow
The ICRP/UNSCEAR concept of radiation safety was originally developed for
the purposes of protecting military forces from nuclear weapons and protection of
The establishment of acceptable (“safe”) levels of anthropogenic radiation
(individual effective equivalent dose of 1 mSv/person/year)
is not based on reliable data.
The main criterion of radiation safety on the battle field was the ability of men to continue
battle for next several hours after a N-explosion.
Radiation protection of nuclear personnel is easier because just a few radionuclides must be
controlled in the workplace.
The existing dose concept is not efficient for providing radiation safety of
the general public from chronic low irradiation from many radionuclides,
like those around Chernobyl or Fukushima.
The ICRP/ UNSCEAR model of radiation safety (dose concept)
contradicts the growing volume of data concerning
measured real negative consequences of chronic low irradiation.
ICRP/ UNSCEAR の放射線安全モデル（放射線量の概念）は、
I want, that my readers LEARN!
Posted in Uncategorized, tagged BEIR, cell, Cesium 137, Chernobyl, Children, Department of Energy, doe, Fukushima, Hanford, IAEA, IAEO, ICRP, internal emitters, Japan, Membrane, mitosis, nuclear, Petkau Effect, Plutonium, Rats, thorium, UNSCEAR, W.H.O., WHO on September 2, 2012 | Leave a Comment »
> BEIR III admits Petkau Effect: If gamma radiation comes from EXTERNAL, it starts protective action of the enzyme. When irradiated from the INSIDE with beta radiation of tritium, there is no protective effect: page 469 – 469 http://iopscience.iop.org/0260-2814/1/2/002/
MEANS: The lower and slower a dose is, the less it is recognized by the body. So, it causes more damage, tha high and fast doses from outside. This means: ALL REACTOR CHIMNEY EMISSIONS: http://tekknorg.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/ge-ari2.jpg
“The renowned British biologist, J.B.S. Haldane, suggested in 1948 that perpetual exposure to natural background radiation might account for most of humanity’s accumulated burden of inherited afflictions”: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/Asleep@Wheel.html#Part2
“Natural background radiation is the mutagen which accounts for 25% or more of those cases of Irregularly Inherited Afflictions which occur because of inherited predisposition.” http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/Asleep@Wheel.html#Part2
Oxidization in YOUR DNA: http://moribin.blog114.fc2.com/blog-entry-1700.html
LOW RADIATION becomes HIGH RADIATION when ingested with food – Low Doses of Radiation – Objective Laws of their Action and Risk: http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/BurlakovaChernobyl-Belarus.pdf
= Internal Emitters are 10 to 100 times more dangerous than their external equivalent: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/06/17/nuclear-cancer-industry/
+ Children’s Mitosis even accelerates this damage, because their cells divide faster than in adults, copying the damage to the next cells, having NO TIME to repair. Faster metabolism does not help.
IAEA, WHO, UNSCEAR, ICRP even BEIR see no difference between INTERNAL and EXTERNAL radiation – this is the reason for fraud dose limits and ultimatively ATOMIC DARWINISM
Genomic Instability is caused by Internal Emitters in the body, from irradiated food, by man made nuclear fission.
RADIATION > FREE RADICAL > CELL DAMAGE > TISSUE DAMAGE > DISEASE http://www.nuclearreader.info/chapter4.html
Hiroshima & Nagsaki: Birth of a killer dose limit Agenda (T65D study 1950): http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/08/10/hiroshima-nagsaki-birth-of-a-killer-dose-limit-agenda-t65d-study-1950/
> Hanford USA: Extremely elevated cancer incidence in staff despite lower radiation exposure: At that time, the 20-fold reduction of the dose limit was requested: By all means the officials have tried to refute the work. It was said the amounts of radiation had been measured incorrectly. It is nevertheless argued that such employees are monitored precisely! http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/422389
> Portsmouth dockyard workers who repair nuclear submarines: 5.6 times higher rate of leukemia in 1978: http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2878%2990741-9/abstract
> different areas in New York State , 1956: Increased natural radioactivity of the soil by uranium, thorium. Increased mortality of newborns and developmental defects. 20 to 40 percent higher. One percent per mrad (0.00001 Gray): http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1372765/?tool=pmcentrez
> Close relationship between stillbirths with visible deformities and the intensity of cosmic radiation. 1960: 1.8 malformations per 1000 births at the equator. About 50 degrees north latitude: 5 malformations per 1000 births. Explainable by Petkau Effect. With the effects of radiation on the nucleus (hereditary), the greatly increased number of stillbirths would have been unable to explain: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13844093
> In many cases, increased chromosomal abnormalities in the blood of people living on thorium-containing Monozite sandy soil. Residents and workers were examined. Ten-fold increase of lead 212 in the air (beta rays) increased chromosomal defects from 0.9 to 2 percent. Another ten-fold increase in lead 212 concentration increased defects by 0.57 percent. Means: A larger effect of smaller doses: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1762904/
> 1984, New Scientist: Internal studies of the DOE Department of Energy: Workers of twelve different nuclear plants. Nine of the studies found up to 50% higher leukemia rates, above average: lung cancer, lymphoma, brain cancer, malignant tumors of the digestive organs. Common diseases of the respiratory system were more frequent. 2,529 workers were examined in plants of the DOE. All workers had received more than 50 mSv per year. The cancer rate was three times higher: http://books.google.de/books?id=YIAzHckpZswC&pg=PA3&lpg=PA3#v=onepage&q&f=false
> If Oxygen in cells is replaced by nitrogen, the dose must be many times increased to destroy of the membranes. Thus, the damaging role of oxygen is demonstrated (free radicals: O negative): http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/abs/10.1139/m74-049
> Even pro nuclear BEIR III 1980 report shows: The protection of the membrane is possible by enzymes and substances. These bind free radicals. This is indirect evidence for the oxidation of the membranes in living Systems: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/201/4359/875.short
> The lower the concentration of strontium-90 in rat bone, the greater the damage to the bone marrow: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5748432 “the dose rates are too low to reduce the ‘requisite’ repair levels” PAGE 4 http://www.solarsplendor.com/Nuclear%20Research/Biological%20low-dose%20radiation%20effects.pdf
> human blood cells of radiologists and X-ray technicians (Universtity of California): For rubidium cell membranes were more permeable – So, more damage, than regular staff. The largest increase of the damage was at the lowest total doses. Percentage: A hundred times larger. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4683533
> With a high dose rate of 1900 rad (19 Gray) per minute – with nuclear explosions – is the total dose of 2000 Rad (20 Gray) needed to damage cell membranes of blood: http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/3572559?uid=2129&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&sid=21101160429691
> Rats inhaled plutonium dust – Doubling dose for cancer was only 180 mrad (1.8 milli Gray). According to conservative ICRP and IAEA guidelines, it would have amounted to 395 rad – 3.95 Gray! But it was only 1,8 milli Gray! ICRP’s estimates has been miscalculated to the 190-fold! http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4358363
> Hamsters: Larger effect of small doses: Polonium 210 was applied to their lungs: The largest increase of cancer cases arose at the lowest total radiation dose (see Petkau, Chelack, Stokke, Scott Sanders – all above): http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/639040
> Hamsters: 15 times more lung cancer by Polonium 210 in samll units over 15 weeks, than a TOTAL dose of the same amount at once: Mac Candy R.B. et al “Exp. Lung Cancer” Springer Verlag, 1974, p. 485 (http://books.google.de/books?id=kkxzmBwKt78C&pg=PA208&lpg=PA208&dq=Mac+Candy+R.B.+et+al+%22Exp.+Lung+Cancer%22+Springer+Verlag,+1974&source=bl&ots=szKH-CV3in&sig=kaT6Wsm9k2-RlwSWYJVdEscr_UU&hl=de#v=onepage&q=Mac%20Candy%20R.B.%20et%20al%20%22Exp.%20Lung%20Cancer%22%20Springer%20Verlag%2C%201974&f=false)
ONLY 7 (seven!) mSv destroy cell membranes if you use a dose rate of 0,01 mSv per minute. IF YOU use a dose rate of 260 (!) mSv per minute you have to wait until 35,000 (35 thousand!) mSv are reached! This is 5,000 times more energy! Although the first dose is low and slow This means: Slow and low doses are (over the years) MORE DANGEROUS than high doses!
Erythrocytes / Tradescantia and bone marrow cells are destroyed and mutate by slow and low doses: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-1-4615-8972-3_7 / http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/jyd74e00/pdf;jsessionid=8A62A199CCC3408148BD21A7212E566C.tobacco03
The rise of non-leukemia cancers in the 20th century: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1567333/bin/envhper00395-0049-a.jpg
“It is important to study the effect of low-level irradiation at the population level /in an exposed human population the number of people whose blood cells do not give an adaptive response to subsequent exposures has increased / it was shown that 15 generations of cells irradiated with the doses 10 to 50 cGy (100 to 500 milli Gray) “remember” the irradiation and respond to external stimuli differently than the control.” PAGE 60 http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/chernobylebook.pdf
Juri Dubrova created children DNA fingerprints and compared their data with the DNA profile of British children who had lived on non irradiated region. The results of the study: the higher the soil contamination by cesium-137, the higher the mutation rate in a genomic fragment: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC378537/
Published in 1990 by Martin Gardner and Eve Roman, a study in which they examined the fathers of children with leukemia. They found: These fathers worked at Sellafield before “making” children and were exposed to radiation. The higher their dose was, the greater the risk was for their children to develop leukemia. Maximum: 5 mSv per year (Japan 20 mSv per year) repost: http://www.jstor.org/pss/29718787
Louise Parker in 1999 published a paper in which she examined primarily stillbirth in the “radiation workers” who work in a nuclear plant. She registered 9,208 births – among them were 130 stillbirths. The result of Parker’s study is appalling: When “producers” were irradiated 24 percent more stillbirths occured than of non-irradiated. (repost) http://www.lancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2899%2904138-0/abstract
Presently the international organizations (WHO, IAEA) recognize as the main cause of increase of thyroid cancer in liquidators and children population after the accident their irradiation with radioactive iodine, I-131. The rest of diseases, they suppose, are provoked by psycho-emotional reactions. http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Burlakova.pdf
The bimodal dependence of effects on dose was revealed for all studied parameters. Namely, effects increased at low doses, reached maximum (for low doses), then decreased (in some cases the effect sign reversed) and thereafter increased with the increase of dosage.
An excpert from the movie “Nuclear Controversis” by Wladimir Tchertkoff: http://vimeo.com/33724891
Fernex – Don’t you think that during 15 years, the majority of Caesium is internal?
Gentner (UNSCEAR)– No. It’s not internal. Are you talking about the external exposure that people receive?
Fernex – I am speaking of the internal one, which they receive through food in very large population.
Gentner (UNSCEAR)– I refuse to think that whether a radiation dose is internal or external, what counts is the dose received by whatever mechanism and to prey on people’s consciousness to say that somehow, because it’s internal, it’s worse, doesn’t do service to the people.
Fernex – There are cardiac diseases found in humans, found in children which may lead to sudden death.
Gentner (UNSCEAR)– OK, we know these complications, these things are arising. But to simply say that these things have occurred following the accident, and to infer from that a blind acceptance that they are radiation related, doesn’t allow the public health authorities of these countries to serve their people.
Fernex – There are doses related in children.
Gentner (UNSCEAR)– I have not seen any information on that.
Fernex – There are universities in Belarus which have been working on this topic for nine years. And you never had any interest to what they did? http://vivretchernobyl.blogspot.de/2008/06/w-tchertkof-nuclear-controversies.html
If the food you EAT contains 1 becquerel of let’s say Cesium 137 – it’s not safe. You eat many times a day, many days a week, a month, a year, a whole LIFE. And the Full Decay Time of Cesium 137 is 300 years -> 10 HUMAN GENERATIONS – and it’s coming from every reactor, each second. That’s what we are talking about, if we say “the food is safe, it’s below the limit” – it means YOU EAT and YOU STORE it in your BODY. Becquerel after Becquerel. ALL THE TIME. After years you have hundreds and thousands of Becquerel in your body. This is not known, because Whole Body Counters for Internal Radionuclide Measurments are not as common as CT or X-Ray machines.
Cesium 137 decays into Barium – blocking the Receptors. And it sends out Gamma + Beta, destroying 100% on the cellular level. 1 becquerel = 100 % damage. ALWAYS.Mitosis: The cell in the child is damaged: Cell wants to repair, can’t, because it divides to fast (Children grow), so we have 2 damaged cells, and so on, and so on -> Cancer latency of children is very very short. But as always Doctors, Health Organisations and Authorities and even Parents blame everything else. The Atomic Industry gets away. More cancer = More profit.
“Recently, in a concerted effort to raise the permissible levels of radiation for workers and the public, members of the Heath Physics Society have been actively promoting their theory of Hormesis, namely, that low dose exposures to radiation induce “beneficial” effects such as longevity, robustness, radio-resistance and increased growth. The use of the term “beneficial” implies a judgment, not a scientific fact. Experiments backing these hypotheses have been difficult to reproduce and definitions of “beneficial” have been controversial and appear very subjective. Claims of low dose hormesis have frequently been based on high dose observations, and the only mechanisms offered for these effects has been speculation on repair overshoot at the cellular and genome level. Cell growth as “hormetic” is the most troubling claim, since illicit growth stimulation signifies catastrophe for biological organisms.” FROM http://www.ccnr.org/radiation_standards.html
BIMODAL: “Presently the international organizations (WHO, IAEA) recognize as the main cause of increase of thyroid cancer in liquidators and children population after the accident their irradiation with radioactive iodine, I-131. The rest of diseases, they suppose, are provoked by psycho-emotional reactions..” (!!!…RADIOPHOBIA…!!!) There is no linear dose effect correlation, but “The bimodal dependence of effects on dose was revealed for all studied parameters. Namely, effects increased at low doses, reached maximum (for low doses), then decreased (in some cases the effect sign reversed) and thereafter increased with the increase of dosage”: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Burlakova.pdf IGNORED BY IAEA, UNSCEAR, ICRP, WHO
with kind regards,
Posted in 1945, tagged 0 Bertell, 1945, 1950, ABCC, atom, Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission, BEIR, Bura Bura, cancer, D86, Dr Nida, Hibakusha, Hiroshima, IAEA, IAEO, ICRP, Japan, Life, Nagaski, nuclear, reactor, RERF, T65D, UNSCEAR, USA, WHO, WWII on August 10, 2012 | 1 Comment »
“The ionizing radiation stimulations are “illicit” in the sense that there is no equivalent stimulation of the arachidonic pathway after non-radiological physiological stimulation, making it pathogenic in character, difficult for the body to regulate and return to homeostasis. This response activates the monocytes, which kill themselves by the oxidants they produce, often ending up as pus along with their digested cellular victims. They can endanger the host by killing other tissue, for example, transplants or infarcted heart tissue. Activated monocytes are carcinogenic, provoking hitherto latent oncogenic systems and genomic errors to replicate. This may well be one of the mechanisms by which cancers were increased within the first ten years after the Chernobyl disaster. These cancers were dismissed by the IAEA as not radiation related because the ICRP required latency period of ten years had not been completed. These were radiation promoted or accelerated cancers, not radiation induced cancers. Again, we see ICRP recognizing only radiation induced cancers, whereas the victim will experience both mechanisms as due to the disaster.” http://www.ccnr.org/radiation_standards.html#at
The Criminality of Japan’s Radiation Effects Researchers: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr139/pdf/watanabe.pdf
“To say there is no effect and ignore the issue, just because it has not been scientifically proven, is not a scientific response.”
RERF is the successor to the ABCC (Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission) – which today is NRC in USA. MILITARY! http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/No1Escapes.html
Dr Itsuzo Shigematsu – chairman RERF @ Hiroshima Institute.
He set up the limit of the dose for the resettlement and maximum values for contaminated food: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/03/22/iaea-uncesco-icrp-playing-down-radiation-in-fukushima-and-chernobyl-is-scientifically-valid/
Hiroshima & Nagasaki: The T65D study from 1950 (by US military) is applicable to all dose limits and food “safety” that we have today: All internal emitters are ignored, latency is ignored, children and fetuses are ignored. T65D is a nuclear holocaust in slow motion: The international radiation protection bodies such as ICRP, UNSCEAR and BEIR base their findings on the somatic damage (cancer, leukemia risks) mainly on studies of the victims of the nuclear tests of Nagasaki and Hiroshima, wo still lived in 1950. That’s right, not 1945, 1950! This study is called “T65D.” It was begun in 1950. The five years before that has not been studied. It was observed since 1950. About 800,000 Japanese people harmed by radiation, and the analysation of their causes of death. http://www.rerf.or.jp/glossary_e/t65d.htm and: http://www.rerf.or.jp/library/archives_e/lsstitle.html / For validation of this study the US even did an atomic test in Nevada: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/212/4497/900.extractMore: “Since 1950, more than 90,000 of the survivors of the atomic bombings at Hiroshima and Nagasaki have been enrolled in a lifetime study of their health”: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/RIC/chp4F.html / Alteration of the study: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/RIC/chp5F.html
“the famous failure to detect (at a statistically significant level) any extra frequency of inherited afflictions, in the Japanese children of the Atomic Bomb Survivors”: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/Asleep@Wheel.html
From 2012 -> new Cover Up in the making: http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ201211200069
Each person has been exposed to a certain dose of radiation that had to be estimated later (!) Because of the location of the bomb explosion at the moment (T65D study). It is at HIGH DOSE SHORT TERM (explosion). This is in contrast to chronic low-level radiation. ICRP, UNSCEAR and BEIR exclude results that you get from high doses to the low dose effects. THIS IS A CRIME and unscientific and unethic.
Every decision making is made by RERF’s knowledge which neglects the Internal Emitter.
Accordingly the standard for food and drink as well.
“Another century of nuclear power, and this carnage would continue with more than 10 million victims a year. An industry which has the potential to kill, injure and maim that number of innocent people- and all in the name of ‘benefitting’ society – is surely wholly unacceptable. ” http://exacteditions.theecologist.org/read/ecologist/vol-29-no-7-november-1999-5368/31/3/
We all live in the atomic fire, “proven safe” by T65D Hiroshima & Nagsaki Study.
“Up to 1,300 million people have been killed, maimed or diseased by nuclear power since its inception. The industry’s figures massively underestimate the real cost of nuclear power, in an attempt to hide
its victims from the world.” http://exacteditions.theecologist.org/read/ecologist/vol-29-no-7-november-1999-5368/29/2/
FAKE SCIENCE: http://www.foe.arc.net.au/kohnlein/kohnpaper.html
“Nagasawa and Little have noticed that alpha-particles already a doses as low as 0,3 mGy leads to significant increase in frequency of sister chromatid exchanges in Chinese Hamster ovary cells…” http://www.foe.arc.net.au/kohnlein/kohnpaper4.html
“there is no safe dose, no safe-dose rate, nor a safe dose threshold”: http://www.foe.arc.net.au/kohnlein/kohnpaper2.html
Atomic Wounds – At 89, Doctor Hida, a survivor of the 1945 atomic bomb at Hiroshima, continues to care for some of the other quarter of a million survivors. Atomic Wounds retraces his dedicated journey and highlights how the terrible danger of radiation was concealed by successive American administrations in the 50′s – 70′s so that nuclear power could be freely developed, with no concern for public health. http://www.youtube.com/movie?v=_EOeRb-ddqc&ob=av1e&feature=mv_sr
800 tons of DU is the atomicity equivalent of 83,000 Nagasaki bombs. The U.S. has used more DU since 1991 than the atomicity equivalent of 400,000 Nagasaki bombs. Four nuclear wars indeed, and 10 times the amount of radiation released into the atmosphere from atmospheric testing! SOURCE: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/DU/KYagasakiOnDU.pdf
President Kennedy, June, 1963: “the number of children and grandchildren with cancer in their bones, with leukemia in their blood, or with poison in their lungs might seem statistically small to some, in comparison with natural health hazards, but this is not a natural health hazard–and it is not a statistical issue. The loss of even one human life, or the malformation of even one baby–who may be born long after we are gone–should be of concern to us all. Our children and grandchildren are not merely statistics toward which we can be indifferent.” http://www.ratical.org/radiation/inetSeries/RB89.html
Kofi Annan about Chernobyl: “the exact number of victims may never be known, but that 3 million children require treatment and “many will die prematurely.” http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=20000426&slug=4017441 Today? Not a single word about Fukushima.
The crimes TODAY: Dr. Yamashia and Fukushima Medical University are pro nuclear: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/06/03/fukushima-medical-unversity-accelerating-children-death/
“The biggest risk is the “Internal Emitter” which is totally different from external radiation as IAEA, ICRP, UNSCER, RERF, NIRS of MEXT asserts that less than 100mSv is uncertain. It is KNOWN: Internal Emitter of lower dose ACCUMELATE. Even IAEA admit this in the Publication 111.(Evidence is the Picture Attached. See this carefully, No doubt. Continuous Lower dose accumulates in your body in long time. IN THIS PICTURE 1000 days, less than 3 years.) Dr.Yamashita USES Publication 103 which do not admit this and OUT OF DATE. (This is really, really CHEAP TRICK.)
There’ll be thousands of these examples available in the future. (Within 3 years according to the CHART attached.)
This is not child but rather old husband and wife in 70′s.
WBC detected 20,000Bq of Cesium in their body.There are clear evidences and scientific analysis of the mechanism. Your DNA is continuously injured and tapestry of diseases overwhelms your body. CANCER is NOT the point at all. All we care is QOL(Quality Of Life) for 20-30 years and GENERATIONS. This (The Internal Emitter damages all the DNA’s not only human, but trees, grasses, insects, birds, animals, fishes…EVERY LIFE and Environments. These are well clarified by the famous “Chernobyl” of NY Academy of Sciences, 2009 and the “cited 150,000 references” from Belarus, Chernobyl, Ukraine and all the European countries.)”Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment”
http://www.nyas.org/publications/annals/Detail.aspx?cid=f3f3bd16-51ba-4d7b-a086-753f44b3bfc120,000Bq in Body detected.