Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Tschernobyl’

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

Click on every photo & scan you can see here.

future-is-on-fire4

cherno-shelter

Chernobyl needs no sarcophagus, not today and not in 1986, because it was and is EMPTY. The establishment of a sarcophagus was crazy, senseless and deadly – But right now, they build the 2nd one. A new Containment for a dangerous truth.

The liquidators have not liquidated Chernobyl. The liquidators have liquidated themselves.

800,000 worked in the area. On site, as doctors, workers… but they worked in the Chernobyl Core – which was was scattered everywhere. In microparticles. This means: Soviet officials evacuated 130,000 civilans, but sent 800,000 into the irradiated areas!

The Reactor became empty, when the second explosion happened.

A nuclear one. What? Not possible? Sadly, it is. And it is known since the first reactor was build. A moderator / water is vital for each reactor, because it can become nuclear explosive.

vzryv_na_chetvertom_bloke 6337147eb183a58d885705bdd44_prev 970449913  29438

The CORE data:

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion42 (2)chernobyl-nuclear-explosion42

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion31

Chernobyl irradiated the whole European Continent – even pro nuclear UNSCEAR clearly admits that (although their numbers are from the textbook):

unscear-chernobyl

http://www.unscear.org/docs/JfigXI.pdf

882275_431284120293557_1499725210_o

belarus-cloud-plane

To understand the principle of the nuclear explosion of the reactor, and unmask probably the biggest lie in technological history of human history, just have a look at this:

- Chernobyl was a nuclear explosion

- No containment can keep such a explosion

- The weight of the reactor lid was 2,000 tons (NOT 1,000!) – important for energy calculation later below

- A containment would increase the yield of the explosion (pressure!)

- This principle is as old as the principle of man made nuclear fission:

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion15 chernobyl-nuclear-explosion16 chernobyl-nuclear-explosion17 chernobyl-nuclear-explosion18 chernobyl-nuclear-explosion19

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion04

the above scan is from: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2013/03/28/chernobyl-the-accident-and-its-implications-for-other-nuclear-reactors/

From the book “History of the British nuclear industry” by Margaret Gowing, “Britain and Atomic Energy”, on page 382 the former  U.S. water-cooled graphite reactor at Hanford is described: “To be built in view of the risks of an accident, the reactor is at an isolated location. Because water absorbs neutrons, and when the water flow is interrupted and the control rods do not occur immediately in action, the water evaporates in the cooling system and can no longer absorb the neutrons . These neutrons were therefore available to increase the fission rate in the reactor, which is super critical with power. The temperature rises, the fuel evaporated and the radioactivity is spreading widely. “

On page 385 we find the position:
“The gas cooling is to avoid the risk of severe supercritical state …”

What is supercritical?

The knowledge of the danger of an atomic explosion that can occur in a water-cooled graphite-gas reactor, is as old as the principle of the reactor itself.

Safety Assessment Principle 152 requires ‘The containment should adequately contain such radioactive matter as may be released into it as a result of any fault in the reactor.’ Clearly if nuclear explosions are possible a licence should not be granted. LAST PAGE: http://www.spokesmanbooks.com/Spokesman/PDF/91Gifford.pdf

safety-cherno-nuclear

Chernobyl was build by ROSATOM – the ones who build a new reactor in Chernobyl irradiated Belarus, the ones who helped Iran with their nuclear reactors. Chernobyl went critical 1st time 1984, 2 years before the explosions:

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion12

So, what happened at Chernobyl Reactor 4? First a small and short summary. Then a BIG one further below. Are you with me?

1) A very good summary with exact Energy Yields was made by: “Martinez Val, Jose M., Aragones, Jose M., Mingues, Emilio, Perlado, Jose M., Velarade, Guillermio. An Analysis of the Physical Causes of the Chernobyl Accident. Nuclear Technology. Vol. 90, June 1990: http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/Artikel%20zu%20Tschernobyl%20in%20Nuclear%20Technology%20Vol%2090.pdf (this is the worldwide only exclusive link providing this file). Chernobyl’s 190,3 tons Core consisted of 450 Kg Plutonium 239.

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion05

This is also something the nuclear advocats don’t want you to know: 250 Kg Plutonium 239 are produced by each reactor. This is why they were invented: For Plutonium, NOT electricity. Chernobyl was primarily a military reactor. You could extract the Plutonium while the reactor was running. Because of the two halves of the Core. So there is much potential for supercriticality. EVERY reactor needs critical ingredients to “start” – it is in the BOL fuel, the “Beginning Of Life” Fuel. It starts with it. Chernobyl even with more. Give it a face: Nagasaki was “only” 6,2 Kg Plutonium. While every reactor has 250 Kg of it! Now, credit that!

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion28

2) In Chernobyl there were TWO Explosions. Number One set the reactor dry – with 200 Gigajoules Energy (0,2 Terrajoule), and then Core poisoned itself and heated it up 100°C every 0,1 seconds. The 2nd explosion reached 1,000 Gigajoules (1,0 Terrajoule) and led to destruction / phase transition of the fuel:

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion06

Other sources say: H. van Dam. says: “900 Gigajoules”: http://iopscience.iop.org/0034-4885/55/11/003 still a good “housenumber”.

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion09

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion10

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion20

NRC official: http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML0716/ML071690245.pdf 

3) The Temperature reached more than 2,000°C degrees – reaching 47,000 % POWER!

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion01

4) Reaching 4,000 – 5,000°C these temperatures were no longer chemical, they were nuclear. Officials tell us: “Chernobyl was a hydrogen / steam explosion” – maybe the first one. But with the heating up, it became too hot for these kind of explosions. Don Arnot (below) said: At these temperatures steam ionizes and dissociates into the gases oxygen and hydrogen. These detonating gases do not explode above 2,000 / 2,100 °C.

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion29

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion13

Source: http://books.google.de/books?id=QGlMb5wXs5sC&pg=PA174#v=onepage&q=arnott&f=false

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion14

http://books.google.de/books?id=oEqd0IeAhccC&pg=PA6&hl=de&source=gbs_selected_pages&cad=3#v=snippet&q=4000&f=false

Often officials as former soviet Agencies, IAEA, NRC, UNSCEAR, tell the lie of a “hydrogen” or “steam” explosion. That is a lie. It comes from the textbook. Because otherwise reactors would get no licence to be built. They have to keep their inventory inside at all cost. The nuclear textbook is a template and experts push reality through it. The Officials lie about the temperature, or the weight of the reactor lid, or any other data, at least one of them. To downplay the nature of the explosion. But the reactor hall is no more. A fact. Plus the 2,000 tons reactor lid.

50 million Chernobyl curies? IAEA? “The pro-nuclear Time magazine reported in 1989 that perhaps “one billion or more” curies were released, rather than the 50 to 80 million estimated by Russian authorities.” Source: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/Chernobyl/Chernobyl@10p2.html

All radiation maps, doses, emissions are from the text book – not from reality. 50 million curie are: 1,850,000,000,000,000,000 Becquerel (1.85e+18) released by CHERNOBYL. A lie!

There is nearly NOTHING left in the Chernobyl 4 reactor! This is proven! 

Argonne National Laboratory in Illinois: 9 Billion Curie

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California: 4,5 Billion Curie

Source: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb6393/is_n3_v12/ai_n28692892/

1,85 1,85 1,85 1,85 1,85 1,85… Just remember this number ONE point EIGHT FIVE and the 50

let’s look at the Boiling Water Manual from GE, also for Fukushima:

page 73: CLICK!

page 76: CLICK!

Every reactor releases 50 micro curie of radioactive gases: which is 1,850,000 becquerel PER SECOND!

There is the 50 and the 1,85 again!

It’s all from the textbook!

It’s not the reality!

Can you control atoms?

>>>> A normal reactor releases 1,850,000 becquerel per second. Multiply it with x 10 = 18,500,000 becquerel – these are also the offical MAXIMUM LEVELS of radionuclide activity in the exclusion Chernobyl zone in Belarus (from the 1995 Belarus NATIONAL Report):

Again the 1,85 !

daily dose at a 1000 Curie per km² area, for example near Chernobyl reactor 4 with 37 mio becquerel per m² (map) is something like 10 mSv PER DAY – while normal is 1 – 2 mSv per year.

They press reality into their simulation models. Especially Chernobyl. The 50 Mio Curie are used to conceal the fact, that ALL Inventory was thrown out in 1986, thats more than 5 billion curie, not 50 million. But they use the textbook to conceal it, in order to prove that even during an explosion a reactor safe. And now these madmen build a 2nd sarcophagus around and EMPTY reactor, to even underline the 28 years old lie!

nucler-mental

a) A steam explosion can not develop 1,2 Terrajoule. Steam explosion’s Maxium -> 50 Gigajoules. But the explosion lifted the 2,000 tons lid away, and then even destroyed the reactor hall! How powerful is that. Only a maximum of 10 to 50 Gigajoule of Energy are possible by a Steam explosion in Chernobyl – it was the water expelled from Reactor 4:

no-hydrogen

Source: http://books.google.de/books?id=vgwAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA65#v=onepage&q&f=false

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion08

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion11

NRC confirmed the terrajoule data:

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion03

NRC: http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML0716/ML071690245.pdf 

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion02

Yes: 1,400 Cal/gm (calories per gram) are 1,1 Terrajoules = equivalent of 0,2 – 0,3 Kilotons TNT.

There was not enough water, power in water, to create so a high energy explosion, for the 2nd one. This was nuclear.

W54 nuclear warhead is the energy yield equivalent of Chernobyl explosion (0,2 – 0,3 KT TNT):

We are fooled by IAEA and soviet agencies since 1986!

b) What you see here in this video is NOT the fuel melting, because it was thrown completely out by a force of 1,2 terrajule (0,2 – 0,3 KT TNT)  and it is NOT graphite fire, there was none according to a heat photo scanner Checherov used shortly after the explosions. What you see  is the 2,000 tons reactor lid, that was thrown aside and is GLOWING because of HEAT, it was so hot, that it turned from Red (770 – 800°C) into Yellow (1150 – 1250°C). The helicopter crew did not survive. Interivew with above Infos: Constantine Checherov – Senior Researcher of the Kurchatov Institute – one of the first people who visited the reactor hall after the explosion. He does not believe that the explosion of Chernobyl in ’86 exploded was hydrogen. It was a nuclear
explosion scattered hundreds of tons of radioactive fuel around the station: http://www.novayagazeta.ru/society/6095.html

chernobyl-nuke

Info from Interview with Checherov: http://www.novayagazeta.ru/society/6095.html

The fuel can become vaporized:

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion21

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion22 chernobyl-nuclear-explosion23 chernobyl-nuclear-explosion24

Vladimir M. Chernousenko, Scientific Director of the Ukrainian Academy of Sciences  Institute of Physics in Kiev’s Task Force for the  Rectification of the Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident- HE SAID:

“Radiation emission was no less that 80% of the core (with a total of 192 tons), which amounted to 6.4 x 10^9 Ci (Ci = Curie = 37,000,000,000 becquerel) If we divide the figure by the population of the whole earth (4.6 x 10^9 people) then we get 1 Ci per person.”

http://www.ratical.org/radiation/Chernobyl/ChernobylIftI.html

 

Footage from the inside of Reactor 4:

Chernobyl-kochelev

Prof. Pflugbeil (Germany): “Checherow and I went inside the destroyed reactor in Unit IV, as he is there crowled everywhere, even on the bottom of the reactor – accompanied by a small film crew.” – “I want now speak about the second Sarcophagus, because it does not serve to disguise a dangerous ruin, but for the concealment of dangerous lies. Since there are a lot of inconsistencies. Worldwide, for example, the version that 95 percent of the nuclear fuel still in there – is accepted, and that it would pose a threat for Ukraine and for the whole of Western Europe. Checherov has refuted this claim and he clearly says less than 10 percent are still in there. He was commissioned in 2001 by the Kurchatov Institute, to do a research report related to the second Sarcophagus. He has investigated room by room, measured, photographed, take core samples and has made his research report. He got a high distinction for it and the report ended up in a drawer forever! It interferes with the business.” Source: http://www.taz.de/!82695/

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion43

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion25chernobyl-nuclear-explosion26

“And that he (Checherov) has worked in the the lower part of the reactor for five hours. He said there were only is 10 tons. Otherwise they would have been so dead as a doornail. When we were in there, that was an uneasy feeling for me. The sound of the instruments, no light, you had to watch where you step and climb and you never knew whether or not chunk falls down from above. There are a thousand different rooms accessible in these ruins, heavily damaged. At the bottom of the reactor pot: We climbed over it broken things. At some areas there were even these elephants ‘feet’ of  molten material. Checherov has shown us all.” – “In the reactor pot was nothing. It was all thrown out with tremendous force into a short and violent explosion, which was so strong that it has lifted the 2,000-ton concrete lid. So the energy source is nuclear energy, clearly and the explosion was a nuclear explosion! The Western world – where  nuclear power plants and nuclear weapons are completely different – wants to ignore it, because otherwise it would clarify that a nuclear power plant can destroy itself with a nuclear explosion. But in the textbook, is written that a nuclear power plant can not. But it can.”

WWWsouzchernobylORG

AN Kiselev, Chernobyl, 1986, block 3: “Power of gamma radiation from a channel, lying on the roof of the third block measured by Zherdev was 2 Sievert per Hour (the limit of the measuring range of the instrument DP-5V ) at a distance of three meters” / “we had to work in an environment where radiation levels could exceed the 10 Sievert per Hour and even higher” / “As soon as the rotary drill bit to the fuel clusters, fuel chips along with the water got into the room , and immediately dramatically increased gamma-ray background” / “Biological protection of the camera has been redesigned in accordance with the requirements of radiation safety.” / “On the tube sites were about 15-20 tons of fuel. On the roof lay the whole fuel assemblies. Approximate weight of 300-350 kg each. The rate per person was calculated by removing 50 kg of graphite or 10-15 kg pieces of fuel rod.” / “the total amount of fuel in the lava-like clusters is within 20 % of the entire nuclear fuel that the reactor had at the time of the accident.”

Chernobyl4

“Checherov analyzed all the reports and minutes of the Integrated expedition with measurements and calculations. The analysis estimated the amount of fuel made on the basis of thermal measurements showed that this estimate was based on assumptions that do not reflect the real picture of the thermal situation in unit 4, and secondly, were based on experiments that are not based on reliable measurements, and voluntarist declarations of expenditure thermal parameters experimentally recorded variations of which varies in the range of up to two orders of magnitude.” / “The maximum thickness of the fuel accumulation , measured on the spot and recorded on the film is 0.5 meters , and if you increase the thickness of the layer 8 times, then this cluster should have a thickness of 4 meters.” / “At the time of the accident in the reactor core were 1,659 fuel channels withg 190,257 kilograms of uranium or its kg dioxide (UO2).”

“where, how much and in what state the nuclear fuel ?” / “Our reports of fuel found in the Unit 4 was several times smaller, but the debate as to why such differences exist and where the truth is – was not gebated in this symposium” / “regardless of the fact that the reactor vault is empty and you can not see this amount of fuel and the amount of such fuel just could not fit in the observed areas, those who were there and personally saw it with their own eyes the empty space – you can not convince the others that there are not huge amount of fuel as declared by those who have not been there ” / ” it turns out that the minimum found fuel is 53 % of the fuel, and if we accept the second version, you still have to find the 91%!http://www.souzchernobyl.org/?section=31&id=563

img_4ee5bbb6f2103

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion30

“Valery A. Legasov” – who was the first russian official who spoke about Chernobyl to the IAEA in 1986, and committed suicide. Before his death he made an audiotape, with untold facts about the Chernobyl explosion. Here are the abstracts of his tapes: “About the accident at Chernobyl” by Academician VA Legasov (text from the 4 cassettes) – in russian: http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/Legasov_V._Ob_Avarii_Na_Chernobiylsk.pdf

His 5 hours long speech at the IAEA 1996 meeting about Chernobyl was ignored: http://books.google.de/books?id=S-SsDtZG5WgC&pg=PA51&dq=new+scientist+valery+legasov&hl=de&ei=Lx_MTuu-BMaEOqb9uKYP&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CDMQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false

He knew about the insanity of sending liquidators to Chernobyl – he could not convince the IAEA and soviet officials. And decades later, Checherov – also from the same institute, indrectly supported the Legasov.

The now many times quotes Checherov (above) wrote this study. It is not simply a theory. HE WAS THERE, many times, WHERE – according to the IAEA, the Fuel should be. But it is not!

“Two different models of the nuclear explosions are known. According to, the core of the Chernobyl reactor transformed to a turbo-jet solid-phase engine after a very short initial overheating of fuel. It flied like a missile from the reactor vault to the central reactor hall by the hydrodynamic forces of gas-phase streams flushing down from the fuel channels. Then it exploded as an atomic bomb in the spaceof the central hall.” source: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr79/kr79pdf/Malko1.pdf

THE FULL STUDY – reads like a thriller! BELOW:

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion33 chernobyl-nuclear-explosion34 chernobyl-nuclear-explosion34b chernobyl-nuclear-explosion35 chernobyl-nuclear-explosion36 chernobyl-nuclear-explosion37 chernobyl-nuclear-explosion38 chernobyl-nuclear-explosion39 chernobyl-nuclear-explosion40 chernobyl-nuclear-explosion41

Chernobyl became even an inspiration for weapons:

RAM-Cherno

Dear fellow people.

The above-described principle is part of nuclear fission reactors. Whether now, or in the course of the life of a reactor.
Is as old as the man-made nuclear fission itself.

It is a principle that we have overlooked. Have overlooked the major areas of science. What the military-industrial complex is silent about, which is not explained the operation staff of nuclear facilities, which is in no Textbook.

With a containment a core will be boiled and blown out / vented, to avoid explosion.

Without containment, the lid makes the safety valve, but there is an explosion.

The inventory can not be kept.

The decay times are longer than any material.

“10 milli gray create 2 point mutations among 1,000 gametes. These are one seventieth ofl the natural mutation rate. If you take all chromosome mutations 10 milli gray produce one-tenth of the total mutation rate. If each year the maximum allowable dose is reached (5 mSv) the genetic mutation rate is increased in 30 years (one generation) by a fifth.” Prof. Dr. Hedy fritz-niggli, Switzerland. The International Commission on Radiological Protection ICRP believes 100 becquerels in one day are the same as a hundred days each day 1 Becquerel. Mathematically correct. Biologically completely wrong.

Herman J Mueller discovered in 1927 the following: ARTIFICIAL TRANSMUTATION OF THE GENE by radiation (Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1946) same story proven by Fukushima’s butterflies, remember? There was the Geneva Summit 1955, about the “peaceful” use of nuclear energy. Mueller wanted to present his report in which he had calculated that people in 200 to 300 years – by the current radiation – will have genetic damage as the most affected survivors of Hiroshima. These people, in 10 generations, would have to work only for one thing: To obtain the means to take care of their suffering. This is what Mueller wanted to tell, BUT the AEC (Predecessor of the NRC) gave him no talk permission. I mean: We experience this NOW! Cancer thins the rows around us (malignancy by genomic instability, by radiation). And the cancer drugs are the most expensive out there. More and more people accept euthanasia. We are eradicated, and then we are obedient till death! And then we twist the truth also: More cases because of better diagnostics!
We are getting older? Yes, if we look at the people who were born BEFORE the atomic age. Check it out the ones born TODAY! In what kind of dream world we live in! http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/08/17/fukushimas-butterflies-known-since-1927/ and http://books.google.de/books?id=ihDdAWPakwgC&pg=PA155&#v=onepage&q&f=false

And this principle, as well as the denial and ignoring the same
Will Set The Future
On fire.

damage-time

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

gennady

The funeral of the founder of the fund “For The Children of Chernobyl” Belarus – Prof. Dr. Gennady Grushevoy. Your work, friend, will never rest in peace. Your Work, philosophy, help has germinated.
http://belapan.by/archive/2014/01/31/media_panihida_v1/

Today died the Founder of the Fund “For the Children of Chernobyl” Belarus. Prof. Dr. Gennady Grushevoy.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Thanks to you, the world learned about Chernobyl.
Thanks to you, many lives could be saved.
Thanks to you, an ethical “chain reaction” arose.
Of help, of Hope, of Future.
Your work marvels enemies and friends.
I remember our conversations.
And how they changed my spirit, my actions radically.
Your words were like knives that never sting, but sharpen the view.
On behalf of all the children of Chernobyl and Fukushima!
On behalf of all 2 million people who got Help from you and your wife!
Infinitely many friends mourn you. Because YOU are ONE of US!
For the Children!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

traueranzeige-gennadij

MEDIA REACTIONS so far:

“since 1989 more than 300,000 young Belarusians were able to improve their health in a clean place thanks to Gennady Grushevoy’s “Fund for the Children of Chernobyl” http://www.svaboda.org/content/article/25245635.html

“One of the organizers and active participants of the Belarusian Popular Front “Revival” (1988). Chairman of the Board of the Belarusian Charitable Fund ” Children of Chernobyl ” ( 1989 ) . Member of the Supreme Council of the Republic of Belarus , a member of the Belarusian Popular Front (1990-1995) , member of the Supreme Council of the Republic of Belarus of the 13th convocation . Chairman of the Belarusian Christian Democratic Party ( since 1996). Coordinator of the Assembly of Democratic NGOs of Belarus (1997). Organizer Youth Christian Social Union , 71 self-help groups , youth social network central ” Workshop of the Future” in different regions of Belarus ( 1997 ) , co-chair of the civil committee “Choice – 2001 ” ( 2000 ) . Member of the Coordinating Council of the International Peace Bureau (Geneva ) . Was judged as one of the organizers of the first ” Chernobyl Way ” ( 30.09.1989 ) . Coordinated the work of the First Assembly of Peoples of Chernobyl (25 – twenty-sixth eleventh 1989) in Minsk. Under his leadership fund ” Children of Chernobyl ” during his work has helped more than 2 million people in Belarus. Awarded annual prizes Norwegian Rafto Foundation for his work in the direction of protection of human rights (1999). Gennady Pear is the author of more than 200 works on philosophy and political science.” http://charter97.org/ru/news/2014/1/28/85129/

PHOTOS: http://www.svaboda.org/content/article/25245108.html

The testament of Prof. Dr. Gennady Grushevoy was published.
“When nearly five years ago, I learned that I had leukemia – a violation of the structure of DNA – I told myself I was lucky in my life, because I’m dead on with life than fighting. But I will not give up by any chance Chernobyl. My ight which started April 26, 1986, at which ‘m the last 27 years on. I am with those who worked after / a Chernobyl . My “departure” is the logical conclusion of my life. Such care was given to me by God and destiny. And I take it as a soldier in the war, because it is better to die in the attack at the front than at the “rear” of malaria.


Perhaps this fate convinces someone that Belarus has no future if the Chernobyl consequences are ignored. You can not hope to flee this tragedy or hide or escape. That is why the government should engage in a serious way concerning Chernobyl. Only then will the nation has any hope of salvation. At one time I fought for the post-Chernobyl Belarus. Today, half of Europe is fighting for me. Europeans give me the drugs that I could not give belarusian patients. And with this advance I should work on full …”
http://www.svaboda.org/content/article/25245802.html

HIS NGO AND WIFE (rare footage):

INTERVIEW:

NGO PRESENTATION:

legal-status

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

SITUATION in ALDI Supermarkets:

ALDI2913

Belarusian example:

This is a small “village” in south central Belarus, it’s called “Good Will”: 15 Curie per km² (555,000 becquerel per m²) Chernobyl irradiated area “Dobra Wolya“  – this is the map (Strontium 90 & Cesium 137 & Americium 241): http://www.rbic.by/images/stories/articles/files/Luninetsky-Map.pdf (middle, the large spot): http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/04/21/good-will-is-irradiated/

BELARUS: At 15 curies per square kilometer from every square meter radiate 550,000 becquerel. For comparison: Before Chernobyl cesium load was about 1,000 becquerel per square meter as a result of above-ground nuclear weapons tests. 15 curies per square kilometer is not the maximum value: Hundreds of villages are contaminated with 60 or more Curie.  147 Curie in Tschudjany, in Nowojelna 390 Curie (this corresponds to 14.4 million becquerels per square meter). All these villages – a total of more than 500 – are still inhabited.  http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-13499932.html

Another example: “The two Belarusian villages Lumatschi and Tulgowitschi lie under a layer of plutonium, which emits at 5.4 curies. Plutonium” http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-13499932.html

THE LATEST INDEPENDENT FOOD MEASUREMENTS FROM BELARUS:

BY-FOOD

Latest, independent Food measurements Strontium 90 & Cesium 137. Highest radiation in Minsk (center on map), although state says it’s clean. A lie. Official propaganda map: http://tekknorg.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/by-map-chernobyl.jpg?w=1000&h

BY-FOOD2

Official BELARUSIAN radiation maps (from the textbook, and not real measurements): http://www.rbic.by/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=256&Itemid=86

“According to calculation models used by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), the European Union today accepts that current permissible value limits will lead to at least roughly 150,000 additional cancer deaths in Germany alone each year as a consequence of radiation exposure from food” http://www.foodwatch.org/en/what-we-do/topics/radiation/more-information/foodwatch-report-calculated-fatalities-from-radiation/

July 2013:

BY-CRIIRAD http://www.criirad.org/

Strontium 90 in Baby Food. Belarusian limit of Strontium 90 in milk was 3,7 becquerels per kilogram. Now, for the neighboring countries: 20 BECQUEREL per KG! http://euroradio.fm/stroncyy-u-dzicyachym-harchavanni-mytny-sayuz-dazvoliu-peravyshenne-u-13-razou

2013: Belarusian Potatoes: Strontium 90 -> 40,5 Becquerel per Kg.
Cesium 137 smaller than 4,28 Becquerel per Kg.
http://euroradio.fm/report/bulba-i-malako-z-pad-valozhyna-u-10-razou-peravysili-normy-pa-radyyacyi

boar-chernobyl

“The permissible limits currently set in the EU and Japan for radiation protection mean that the population is exposed to an unnecessarily high risk to health. If we assume that the population of Germany were to ingest food containing the current maximum limits of contamination permitted in the EU – equivalent to the limits applying to imports from Japan – children and adolescents would each be exposed to an annual effective dose of 68 millisieverts (mSv) and adults of 33 mSv. The German radiation protection legislation that governs the operation of nuclear power plants stipulates that the legally permissible limit of total exposure from all exposure pathways is 1 mSv per year for individuals. This means that if children and adolescents ingested the amount of radioactive contamination permitted by EU and Japanese regulations, they would be exposed to 68 times the German limit. Even if only 2 percent of the dietary intake were contaminated to permissible EU and Japanese limits, the annual effective dose would already be over the German limit of 1 mSv.

“Calculations based on models used by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) show that dietary intake of the maximum amount of radioactive contamination permitted in the EU and Japan would lead to at least roughly 150,000 fatalities in Germany each year. Other calculation models reach vastly higher figures. If the entire German population were to eat foods exposing individuals to only 5 percent of the contamination currently allowed in food imports from Japan, at least 7,700 fatalities could be expected; this figure doesn’t even include the secondary consequences of a wide range of greatly varying diseases and genetic disorders.”

Other countries have to some extent set much stricter limits and thereby done more to protect human health. Even the limits in Ukraine and Belarus are much stricter and have continuously tightened over the last few years. The permissible limit for cesium-137 in milk products in Ukraine and Belarus is 100 becquerels per kilogram (Bq/kg), whereas this value stands at 370 Bq/kg in the EU and 200 Bq/kg in Japan.”

Prolonged incorporation of radioisotope in the organism more than 30 Bq/kg is very undesirable, because could lead to the serious consequences: structural and metabolic alterations, energetic deficit, impairment of their functions, death, cell’s poison, cardiomyopathy, cardiac rhythm disturbance, and contraction function of myocardium, spasm of peripheral vessels – Page 26: http://www.chernobyl-today.org/images/stories/Bandajevski_2001_Radiocaesium_and_heart.pdf

Of the 248 children who are in the Belarusian village Bartolomewka at home, half suffering from chronic tonsillitis, epistaxis and resulting anemia, more frequent colds and general immune weakness. Physician assistants Suglob: “Even the eyesight deteriorates more and more.”

500 Bequerel per Kilogram – japanese limit IS MURDER. Why: we can rightly consider the Cesium-137 in relatively small doses (20-30 Bq/kg); a breach of the regulatory processes in the body: PAGE 2 – 3: http://chernobyl-today.org/images/stories/BANDAJEVSKI_UNSCEAR_-_REUTERS_Sept_22nd_2010_Eng_V2.pdf

food

Dose limits lead to enrichment
http://www.strahlentelex.de/RadiationRisk_EU_042011_engl.pdf

Bandazhevsky:

“cesium is easy to accumulate in the heart”

“50 Becquerel break your heart rhythm at 20 to 30 becquerel per kilogram of body weight” (CHILDREN!)

“if, during pregnancy, there is more than 200 becquerel per kilogram of cesium in the placenta it can lead to sudden death of the child”

more scientific info: http://www.chernobyl-today.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=55&Itemid=45&lang=en

nuclear-food

In 1990, members of the Belarusian people’s demanded investigation of the circumstances of concealing information about the Chernobyl disaster. No results, further Coper Up, 1994 came Lukashenko into power and installed the dictatorship: Chernobyl forbidden by decree! http://www.svaboda.org/content/article/24266048.html

More:

English:

http://foodwatch.de/foodwatch/content/e10/e42688/e44884/e45059/2011-09-20pressreleasefoodwatch_IPPNW_EN_ger.pdf

http://foodwatch.de/foodwatch/content/e10/e42688/e44884/e44993/CalculatedFatalitiesfromRadiation_Reportfoodwatch-IPPNW2011-09-20_ger.pdf

http://foodwatch.de/foodwatch/content/e10/e42688/e44884/e45038/2011-09-20Backgroundfoodwatch_IPPNWStrahlenschutznachFukushima_EN_ger.pdf

French:

http://foodwatch.de/foodwatch/content/e10/e42688/e44884/e45039/radioactive_reportfoodwatch-IPPNW2011-09-20_ger.pdf

http://foodwatch.de/foodwatch/content/e10/e42688/e44884/e45055/2011-09-20communiquedepressefoodwatch_IPPNW_FR_ger.pdf

http://foodwatch.de/foodwatch/content/e10/e42688/e44884/e45056/2011-09-20contextefoodwatch_IPPNWcontaminationradioactive_FR_ger.pdf

Japanese:

http://foodwatch.de/foodwatch/content/e10/e42688/e44884/e45057/foodwatch_IPPNW_Report_Sep2011_jp_final_ger.pdf

http://foodwatch.de/foodwatch/content/e10/e42688/e44884/e45058/2011-09-20_PM_jp_ger.pdf

German:

http://foodwatch.de/foodwatch/content/e10/e42688/e44884/e44978/KalkulierterStrahlentod_Reportfoodwatch-IPPNW2011-09-20_ger.pdf

http://foodwatch.de/foodwatch/content/e10/e42688/e44884/e45041/2011-09-20Hintergrund_Grenzwerte_EU-Verordnungen_Messwerte_ger.pdf

polydactyly (6 toes on foot for example)BELARUS: Chernobyl induced: “Anencephaly, severe spina bifida cystica, cleft lips and/or palate, , reduction limb defects leading to disability, esophageal atresia, anorectal atresias, Down’s syndrome and multiple malformations are registered both in stillborns and in fetuses obtained through induced abortion after prenatal diagnostics. The results are presented in Table 2 for the 137Cs contaminated areas and for the control.” http://tekknorg.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/licencetokill05.gif

in contrast:

The European Union imports radioactive goods from areas with a maximum of 20 Milli Sievert per Year (official) AND MORE -  that’s an equivalent of 50 (!) mammograms! FOR CHILDREN. This is dangerous and irresponsible: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2011:080:0005:0008:DE:PDF

EDEKA

edeka-south-chernobyl120713
Chernobyl chanterelles for sale in 2011, by EDEKA, ALDI: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/09/04/chernobyl-chanterelles-for-sale/

And 2013: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2013/07/12/again-edeka-supermarkets-selling-nuclear-heart-killers/

All radiation maps, doses, emissions are from the text book – not from reality. http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2013/07/12/all-radiation-maps-doses-emissions-are-from-the-text-book-not-from-reality/

Latest example: http://fukushima-diary.com/2013/07/english-radiation-survey-map-shows-radiation-levels-by-taking-down-a-figure-one-place/

icon-reality

Radiation Is Always Dangerous, Says World Health Organization Director-General:  http://concernforhealth.org/radiation-is-always-da

remember!
Jan Hemmer

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

FROM JULY 2013:

edeka-south-chernobyl120713

Again nuclear waste back into supermarkets!

From Belarus!

Belarus is completely irradiated by Chernobyl!

2011 by ALDI and EDEKA: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/08/18/warning-aldi-germany-sells-chernobyl-irradiated-chanterelles/

And now by EDEKA!

The full decay time of Cesium 137 is 300 years

This is a small “village” in south central Belarus, it’s called “Good Will”: 15 Curie per km² (555,000 becquerel per m²) Chernobyl irradiated area “Dobra Wolya“  – this is the map (Strontium 90 & Cesium 137 & Americium 241): http://www.rbic.by/images/stories/articles/files/Luninetsky-Map.pdf (middle, the large spot): http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/04/21/good-will-is-irradiated/

“According to calculation models used by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), the European Union today accepts that current permissible value limits will lead to at least roughly 150,000 additional cancer deaths in Germany alone each year as a consequence of radiation exposure from food” http://www.foodwatch.org/en/what-we-do/topics/radiation/more-information/foodwatch-report-calculated-fatalities-from-radiation/

Cesium! The HEART KILLER in Ukraine’s Children: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Kharkiv-Center-of-Cardiac-Surgery/243380055675270

Cesium 137 mimics potassium.

555,000 to 1,48 million becquerel per m² mean 50 – 60 mSv a year! EXTERNAL! Internal not even counted in: http://tekknorg.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/16.jpg

“For children of the Stolinsk District, Brest Province, who were radiated in utero from ambient Cs-137 levels up to 15 Ci/km2, morbidity was significantly higher for the primary classes of illnesses 10 years later. Disease diagnoses were manifest at ages 6 to 7 years” Page 63: http://stopnuclearpoweruk.net/sites/default/files/Yablokov%20Chernobyl%20book.pdf -> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10576018

5 Curie per km² (185,000 becquerel per m²) Chernobyl irradiated area: “Kudritchi” – this is the map (Strontium 90 & Cesium 137): http://www.rbic.by/images/stories/articles/files/Pinsky-Map.pdf (the spot, middle right)

I gave BELRAD institute () on April 6th in Minsk samples to test. They measured Cesium 137 in all samples:

1. Fish (5 Curie area = 185,000 bq / m²) 72 Bq/kg, belarusian limit is 370 bq/kg

2. Eggs (15 Curie area 555,000 bq / m²) 87 Bq/kg, belarusian limit is 370 bq/kg

3. Potatoes (15 Curie area = = 555,000 bq / m²) 72 Bq/kg, ZGU = belarusian limit is 80 Bq/kg

4. Honey comb (5 Curie area = 185,000 bq / m²) 45 Bq/kg, belarusian limit is 370 bq/kg

5. Soil (15 Curie area 555,000 bq / m²) 524 Bq/kg, no limits for soil in Belarus

aldi-south-chernobyl180811c1

Cesium – 137
Half-life is about 30 years (full decay time 300 years), biological half-life of 50-150 days, in children it tends to be shorter. Cesium is excreted through the kidneys. The body uses it as potassium, which is located in each cell. Cesium sends beta and gamma radiation from the decay, and is absorbed by the body from the diet quickly and completely. In whole-body radiation measurements (Whold Body Counter Check-ups), the gamma radiation of cesium – 137 is measured in Bq / kg of body weight and measured before and after a recovery residence of children from Belarus a significant decrease of the Cesium can be seen: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/children-radiation-maps-2/ Cesium  is the “leading isotope” by the disasters of Chernobyl and Fukushima. And where there is Cesium, of course, are also
many other isotopes. Since Cesium can occur in every cell, every organ is to be damaged. It comes to high concentrations in the muscles, and heart muscle where cells die or the blood supply by destroying the vessel walls no longer works. Strokes and heart attacks resulting in people in middle age. Renal failure, high blood pressure in childhood, liver injury and diffuse brain disorders are described. Children suffer from cataracts of the eyes, older people without cataracts are the exception. Also in the placenta cesium is concentrated and harms the growing child. Miscarriages, premature births, birth defects resulting with a large birth risk and developmental disorders. Each organ, especially the lungs and the gastrointestinal tract in women, can develop cancer, and it appears that the cancer caused by radioactive radiation is particularly aggressive and metastasizes quickly.

Rough and inaccurate radiation maps of BELARUS (Am241, Cs137, Sr90, Pu239 & 240), in Curie per km²: http://chornobyl.in.ua/karta-belorussii.html

and RUSSIAhttp://chornobyl.in.ua/karty-zagriaznenia-rossii.html and UKRAINE: http://chornobyl.in.ua/karta-radionulid-ukraine.html

Here is the belarusian state guideline for food and agriculture: http://www.rbic.by/images/stories/articles/files/for_people.pdf / for milk: http://www.rbic.by/images/stories/articles/files/milk.pdf

Belarusian state started declaring 5 Curie areas CLEAN, from 1995 on: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/06/24/nuclear-crimes-belarus-says-chernobyl-irradiated-areas-are-clean/

HERE ARE BELARUSIAN CHILDREN RADIATION MAPS from BELRAD: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/children-radiation-maps-2/

Dying on irradiated soil and murdering with irradiated food is state supported: http://charter97.org/en/news/2009/4/26/17680/

Plutonium 241 (147 years decay time) decays into Americium 241 (4,000 years decay time) decays into Neptunium 237 (22,000,000 years decay time)…

as in 2011: Chernobyl chanterelles for sale:  http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/09/04/chernobyl-chanterelles-for-sale/

THIS IS WHERE CESIUM 137 GOES:

RADIOACTIVE CESIUM: “Prolonged incorporation of radioisotope in the organism more than 30 Bq/kg is very undesirable, because could lead to the serious consequences: structural and metabolic alterations, energetic deficit, impairment of their functions, death, cell’s poison, cardiomyopathy, cardiac rhythm disturbance, and contraction function of myocardium, spasm of peripheral vessels”– Page 26: http://www.chernobyl-today.org/images/stories/Bandajevski_2001_Radiocaesium_and_heart.pdf

500 Bequerel per Kilogram – japanese limit IS MURDER. Why: we can rightly consider the Cesium-137 in relatively small doses (20-30 Bq/kg); a breach of the regulatory processes in the body: PAGE 2 – 3: http://chernobyl-today.org/images/stories/BANDAJEVSKI_UNSCEAR_-_REUTERS_Sept_22nd_2010_Eng_V2.pdf

“cesium is easy to accumulate in the heart”

“50 Becquerel break your heart rhythm at 20 to 30 becquerel per kilogram of body weight” (CHILDREN!)

“if, during pregnancy, there is more than 200 becquerel per kilogram of cesium in the placenta it can lead to sudden death of the child”

in contrast:

The European Union imports radioactive goods from areas with a maximum of 20 Milli Sievert per Year (official) AND MORE -  that’s an equivalent of 50 (!) mammograms! FOR CHILDREN. This is dangerous and irresponsible.

So far had a radioactivity of cesium-134 and cesium-137 have been allowed by a maximum of 600 becquerels per kilogram. Since last weekend the EU limit for food from affected areas in Japan, however, was significantly increased. Consumer organization FoodWatch (web) and the Environment Institute Munich announced in a joint statement, that: For example, should fish oil or spices to their previous value to twenty times higher than what corresponds to 12 500 becquerels per kilogram.

The appropriate Emergency Ordinance 297/2011 was on entered into force on March 27th 2011. Safety standards for Japanese food have been decreased. German Federal Minister of Consumer Aigner contains important information to the public. This is an act against the health of the people. This is not democratic. Then, the E.U. TOOK IT partly BACK: http://www.foodwatch.de/kampagnen__themen/radioaktivitaet/nachrichten/kommissionsentscheidung/index_ger.html Here is the new one from April (see bottom on page for bequerel): http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2011:097:0020:0023:DE:PDF

axon-cesium-potassium

“The permissible limits currently set in the EU and Japan for radiation protection mean that the population is exposed to an unnecessarily high risk to health. If we assume that the population of Germany were to ingest food containing the current maximum limits of contamination permitted in the EU – equivalent to the limits applying to imports from Japan – children and adolescents would each be exposed to an annual effective dose of 68 millisieverts (mSv) and adults of 33 mSv. The German radiation protection legislation that governs the operation of nuclear power plants stipulates that the legally permissible limit of total exposure from all exposure pathways is 1 mSv per year for individuals. This means that if children and adolescents ingested the amount of radioactive contamination permitted by EU and Japanese regulations, they would be exposed to 68 times the German limit. Even if only 2 percent of the dietary intake were contaminated to permissible EU and Japanese limits, the annual effective dose would already be over the German limit of 1 mSv.

“Calculations based on models used by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) show that dietary intake of the maximum amount of radioactive contamination permitted in the EU and Japan would lead to at least roughly 150,000 fatalities in Germany each year. Other calculation models reach vastly higher figures. If the entire German population were to eat foods exposing individuals to only 5 percent of the contamination currently allowed in food imports from Japan, at least 7,700 fatalities could be expected; this figure doesn’t even include the secondary consequences of a wide range of greatly varying diseases and genetic disorders.”

Other countries have to some extent set much stricter limits and thereby done more to protect human health. Even the limits in Ukraine and Belarus are much stricter and have continuously tightened over the last few years. The permissible limit for cesium-137 in milk products in Ukraine and Belarus is 100 becquerels per kilogram (Bq/kg), whereas this value stands at 370 Bq/kg in the EU and 200 Bq/kg in Japan.”

SOURCE:  page 5: http://foodwatch.de/foodwatch/content/e10/e42688/e44884/e44993/CalculatedFatalitiesfromRadiation_Reportfoodwatch-IPPNW2011-09-20_ger.pdf

IT IS 500 Bequerel / Kg in Japan – SOURCE: http://fukushima-diary.com/2011/10/news-spreading-fear/ http://www.city.yokohama.lg.jp/kyoiku/kyu-sokutei/20111012.html

Cancer Deaths 2011 in Germany: 218,000 http://www.n-tv.de/wissen/Vorsorge-wird-ausgebaut-article6686701.html

Radiation Map Germany: https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-Rvm7CeZn1gw/TYcUk22uBvI/AAAAAAAALAw/eakkVrOpPQ0/s1600/Deutschlandkarte_Caesium_Radioaktivit%C3%A4t_Deutschland.gif everything is irradiated. Cesium 137. For 300 years. 10 Generations.

More:

English:

http://foodwatch.de/foodwatch/content/e10/e42688/e44884/e45059/2011-09-20pressreleasefoodwatch_IPPNW_EN_ger.pdf

http://foodwatch.de/foodwatch/content/e10/e42688/e44884/e44993/CalculatedFatalitiesfromRadiation_Reportfoodwatch-IPPNW2011-09-20_ger.pdf

http://foodwatch.de/foodwatch/content/e10/e42688/e44884/e45038/2011-09-20Backgroundfoodwatch_IPPNWStrahlenschutznachFukushima_EN_ger.pdf

French:

http://foodwatch.de/foodwatch/content/e10/e42688/e44884/e45039/radioactive_reportfoodwatch-IPPNW2011-09-20_ger.pdf

http://foodwatch.de/foodwatch/content/e10/e42688/e44884/e45055/2011-09-20communiquedepressefoodwatch_IPPNW_FR_ger.pdf

http://foodwatch.de/foodwatch/content/e10/e42688/e44884/e45056/2011-09-20contextefoodwatch_IPPNWcontaminationradioactive_FR_ger.pdf

Japanese:

http://foodwatch.de/foodwatch/content/e10/e42688/e44884/e45057/foodwatch_IPPNW_Report_Sep2011_jp_final_ger.pdf

http://foodwatch.de/foodwatch/content/e10/e42688/e44884/e45058/2011-09-20_PM_jp_ger.pdf

German:

http://foodwatch.de/foodwatch/content/e10/e42688/e44884/e44978/KalkulierterStrahlentod_Reportfoodwatch-IPPNW2011-09-20_ger.pdf

http://foodwatch.de/foodwatch/content/e10/e42688/e44884/e45041/2011-09-20Hintergrund_Grenzwerte_EU-Verordnungen_Messwerte_ger.pdf

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

WHO Report on Fukushima a Travesty: http://www.i-sis.org.uk/WHO_Report_on_Fukushima_a_Travesty.php

Action & Text by independentwho.org

“For five and a half years we have maintained a daily presence (the Hippocratic Vigil) outside the headquarters of the WHO in Geneva. The aim of the vigil is to denounce the lies and cover-up of this international organisation on the subject of the health consequences of radioactive pollution…”

ENGLISH: http://independentwho.org/en/2012/11/15/vigil-ministry-in-paris/

JAPANESE: http://independentwho.org/jp/2012/11/10/%E3%83%91%E3%83%AA%E5%8E%9A%E7%94%9F%E7%9C%81%E5%89%8D%E3%83%B4%E3%82%A3%E3%82%B8%E3%83%BC%EF%BC%88%E8%A6%8B%E5%BC%B5%E7%95%AA%EF%BC%89/

FRENCH: http://independentwho.org/fr/2012/11/09/vigie-ministere-sante-paris/

This report bears all the hallmarks of WHO’s subservience to the IAEA. It was not written by WHO personnel but by an International Expert Panel convened by the WHO. http://independentwho.org/en/2012/12/08/who-report-a-travesty/

More: Margaret Chan VERSUS World Health Organisation: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/05/27/margaret-chan-versus-world-health-organisation/

WHO downplayed health effects of nuclear crisis on Fukushima residents – The Japan Times Online Dec 6th 2012:

>>> http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/nn20121216a4.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+japantimes+%28The+Japan+Times%3A+All+Stories%29

> “it is recognized by the World Health Organization that the International Atomic Energy Agency has the primary responsibility for encouraging, assisting and coordinating research and development and practical application of atomic energy for peaceful uses throughout the world without prejudice to the right of the World Health Organization to concern itself with promoting, developing, assisting and coordinating international health work, including research, in all its aspects.http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/Others/inf20.shtml#note_c

> Radiation Is Always Dangerous, Says World Health Organization Director-General:  http://concernforhealth.org/radiation-is-always-dangerous-says-world-health-organization-director-general/

CHERNOBYL – the greast Cover Up: http://mondediplo.com/2008/04/14who

“World Health Organisation experts played a role of advocates of the Soviet authorities which tried to play down by any means the scale of the Chernobyl accident and its radiological consequences”: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/1998/kr-21/Malko96-1.html

“experts of IAEA neglected protests of Belarussian and Ukrainian scientists insisting serious increase of child thyroid diseases around Chernobyl against the conclusion of the International Chernobyl Project that there was no health effect there. Five years later the same experts of IAEA had to recognize ′myth′ of thyroid diseases to be facts…” http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Imanaka1.pdf

> “Up to 1,300 million people have been killed, maimed or diseased by nuclear power since its inception. The industry’s figures massively underestimate the real cost of nuclear power, in an attempt to hide its victims from the world.” http://exacteditions.theecologist.org/read/ecologist/vol-29-no-7-november-1999-5368/29/2/

> “We are constantly being told about a ‘permissible amount of radiation.’ Who permitted it? Who has any right to permit it?” Albert Schweitzer
http://icanw.org/1957

“The threshold level of 20 mSv/year is in contrast to the statutory legal limit imposed by the 1972 industrial safety regulation for the nuclear industry. For workers at a nuclear power plant, the maximum limit of exposure (in the controlled area) prescribed by law is 20 mSv/year (not exceeding 50 mSv/year) and a cumulative dose of 100 mSv in five years. The law prohibits the entry of ordinary citizens into the controlled area with radiation dose of 1.3 mSv/quarter and further prohibits workers to eat, drink or sleep in that area. It also prohibits pregnant women to be exposed to radiation dose in a controlled area of over 2mSv/year.

I would like to recall that in Chernobyl the threshold limit for obligatory resettlement was 5 mSv/year or above, apart from soil contamination levels. There are also a significant number of epidemiological studies, which indicate that cancer and other diseases could occur in low dose radiation below 100 mSv/year. According to these studies, there is no low threshold limit for the occurrence of diseases.” http://independentwho.org/en/2012/11/29/anand-grover-fukushima/

Brilliant Article about IAEA, WHO, Fukushima by Agnès Sinai in the latest Le Monde Diplomatique – german translation: http://www.taz.de/!107449/

Jan Hemmer

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 71 other followers