Posts Tagged ‘TEPCO’


1) TEPCO to name NHK chairman as director: http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ201205120047

2) TEPCO shows eagerness to restart reactors at shareholders‘ meeting: http://english.kyodonews.jp/news/2013/06/232494.html

3) NHK holds 7,100,000,000 JPY of Tepco’s bond. NHK is the biggest stakeholder of TEPCO: http://www.asyura2.com/11/senkyo117/msg/360.html

This is one of the reasons why: NHK weather forecasts were without radiation levels FROM DAY 1.

NHK is the biggest stakeholder of these power companies.The sum of money is 34,000,000,000JPY


2.CHUBU power company

3.KANSAI power company

4.Chugoku power company

5.Tohoku power company

NHK doesn’t show radiation levels per city / region during their Weather Forecasts. NHK told the people, the biggest danger goes out from Iodine.

Just like in 1986 – Chernobyl. NISA asked CHUBU Electric to manipulate public opinion: http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ201107295038

And now Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency NISA again plans to restart the reactors AGAINST the People’s will: http://www.newsonjapan.com/html/newsdesk/article/96802.php

2007: Japan Nuclear-Site Damage Worse Than Reported http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/19/world/asia/19japan.html?_r=0

DO NOT LISTEN TO MASS MEDIA.  This is a murderous Agenda they are playing.


Expect ONLY Pro Nuclear from ALL Lame Stream Media. And a total blackout on Civil Society protesting against nuclear holocaust by most media: http://www.aljazeera.com/news/asia/2013/06/2013631371588689.html

And this is the Fukushima Holocaust Sponsors Club: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2013/06/03/fukushima-holocaust-sponsors-club/

Read Full Post »


There are NO SAFETY LIMITS with external and internal radiation exposure!
That is a LIE !
These safety limits only define how high of a percentage they allow on human collateral damage !!

And THAT is the truth !!!!








>>> ユーリー・バンダジェフスキー Cesium 137 and Children – May 12th 2012

>>> 専門家 ユーリー・バンダジェフスキー 日本 Belarusian Chernobyl and Children expert Yury Bandazhevsky in JAPAN

>>> ホールボディーカウンター情報

>>> Japanese Children Cancer Outlook / Children need absolutely CLEAN food

>>> Mother! How much radiation? お母さん!どのくらいの放射線?

>>> ガリーナBandazhevskaya May 12th 2012

>>> ミシェルFernex May 12th 2012

>>> Fukushima Medical Unversity: Accelerating Children Death

>>> 26 Chernobyl years since 1986 – BELRAD Belarus

>>> Children Radiation Maps

thanks to Christopher Noland

& BELRAD Belarus

Jan Hemmer

Read Full Post »


The 100 Millisievert Threshold Lie http://www.strahlentelex.de/The_100_Millisievert_Threshold_Lie_Statement_German_GSS.pdf

Thyroid Cancer & the crime of the IAEA: www.youtube.com/watch?v=lvNR8VtVJpU

How the IAEA actively endangers the health of children

Position Statement: What Is Currently Happening to Fukushima Children? http://fukushimavoice-eng.blogspot.fr/2012/07/position-statement-what-is-currently.html

Children’s thyroid cancer is (was) an extremely uncommon “disease” (mutation). It’s world spontaneous rate doesn’t exceed 1 – 2 cases per 1 million: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/03/04/japanese-children-cancer-outlook-children-need-absolutely-clean-food/

Me speaking @ Correction of History: Forum on Radioprotection May 12 – 13 Geneva by independent WHO.org

Councilor of radiation is led by a pharmaceutical company and ICRP http://fukushima-diary.com/2012/02/councilor-of-radiation-is-led-by-a-pharmaceutical-company-and-icrp/

The Latest of Yamashita and Fukushima Medical University: http://www.cataloghouse.co.jp/2012spring/yomimono/yamashita/index.html – translation by Kitagawa Takashi:

“Complete set of what Dr.Yamashita think about Fukushima children.

This interview reveals what the Yamashita thik about Fukushima Children.
His definite belief:
1. There’s no scientific evidence that radioactive dose less than 100mSv/year has something to do with disease including cancer.
2. The only desease which has something to do is thyloid cancer.
3. It take at least 5years to detect thyloid cancer for children, and 20 years for adults.
4. So it’s enough to examine all the children within 5 years. (Actually he will check within 2 and half years for children under heavy dose)
5. There’s no children with thyloid cancer detected so far. Zero. No problem.

This is fundamental attitude of Japan Academy of Nuclear Health related Association and Foundations and IAEA, NRC, ANSER, etc. Nothing has changed. No lower dose. Without scientific evidence of caused by radioactive, there’s no responsibility, no suit, no payment, namely no problem. If something happend, it’s due to something else, which they call it radio-phobia.
(That’s exacrly what they did in Hiroshima and Chernovyl)

This interview is very rare, done by a mail order business.
Usually NIRS and RERF(formally ABCC) never accept interview.
They reject Chernovyl report(NY Academic Press) and related research work as Non Scientific.
MEXT(Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology) follows them and teach all the children “Smile, Don’t mind it, No problem”.

About 20mSv/year on the playgroud of junior high, the IAEA standarad in emergency state is clarified that 100mSv-20mSv. So they(Committee formed by the Government) say “We take the most strict and severe level for the safety for chldren, namely 20mSv/year”. There’s official record for this decision making.”

It is widely accepted that the A-bomb survivors’ data are an unsatisfactory basis for estimating the effects of internal contamination. As early as 1953, data were available to falsify assumptions that there is a 7-year time lag between exposure and the onset of leukaemia, that there was no fallout or residual radiation at Hiroshima and Nagasaki and that there were no heritable defects in those who were exposed xxiv and hence to falsify a risk model based on those assumptions. Since the Radiation Effects Research Foundation controls were as contaminated as the study group it has been possible to reanalyze RERF data to show whether there are health effects in the controls attributable to fallout. Busby has shown that UNSCEAR reported high leukaemia rates in the Hiroshima controls relative to all Japan. Sternglass attributed to fallout the dramatic increase in cancer rates in children which was recorded all over Japan between three and five years after the Abombings. RERF data have been reanalyzed to show disturbances of sex ratio in  live births.” http://cnic.jp/



Dr. Shinichi Yamashita + Fukushima Mecial University are Japan’s CORE of Pro Nuclear Health Care:







“ The problem is the control over medical experts in Fukushima. They have to follow infamous Dr. Shunichi Yamashita, who is a governmentally supported nuclear medical care expert, who says that a child can be exposed to 100 milliSV of radiation yearly. An ad by a clinic in local papers says, “Breast milk is safe”. Many concerns are expressed, but only in anecdotal ways because we cannot acquire any good information since the Japanese government excluded Fukushima from its annual health monitoring. If somebody goes to a clinic, she or he will see obvious sign languages among staffed nurses saying “Shshhh…don’t tell them!” It’s all about “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”. We need investigation, and need to accumulate data from people in Fukushima for the use of people. With the clinic project, we also want to promote psychological care for people who are suffering with this anxiety.”
–Chieko Shiina at The Peace and Resouce Center of San Diego, July 7th, 2012 http://www.clinic-fukushima.jp/
 Accelerating CHILDREN KILL: Dr Suzuki also claimed it is unlikely thyroid cancer rates would rise and that the results found so far where over 43% of children had abnormalities were “ordinary”: http://www.simplyinfo.org/?p=8220 If the thyroid gland does not work correctly. the fetus is going to suffer
Protection against Fear, not against Radiation!
Contract between IAEA and Fukushima Medical Universitys (“Dr” Yamashita)
“…the IAEA will endeavour to organize conferences, seminars and workshops, in cooperation with the University, with the aim of enhancing public awareness of radiological effects on human health and addressing the issue of “radiation fear” and post-traumatic stress disorders in the Fukushima population…”

it is recognized by the World Health Organization that the International Atomic Energy Agency has the primary responsibility for encouraging, assisting and coordinating research and development and practical application of atomic energy for peaceful uses throughout the world without prejudice to the right of the World Health Organization to concern itself with promoting, developing, assisting and coordinating international health work, including research, in all its aspects.http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/Others/inf20.shtml#note_c


NEWS: info by Yoshimasa Kitsunai
May 7 (part) 2011 Video Professor Shunichi Yamashita answer questions
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWhzpfeHhZw“There is no way of taking responsibility,” Shunichi Yamashita

Back of the governor Yuhei Sato, Shunichi Yamashita remarks “safe to 100mSv” [Ban]
The biggest risk is the “Internal Emitter” which is totally different from external radiation as IAEA, ICRP, UNSCER, RERF, NIRS of MEXT asserts that less than 100mSv is uncertain.It is KNOWN Internal Emitter of lower dose ACCUMELATES.
Even IAEA admit this in the Publication 111.(Evidence is the Picture Attached. See this carefully, No doubt. Continuous Lower dose accumulates in your body in long time. IN THIS PICTURE 1000 days, less than 3 years.)

Dr.YamaSHITa USES Publication 103 which do not admit this and OUT OF DATE. (This is really, really CHEAP TRICK.)Possible fact is revealed by a doctor of Fukushima.
There’ll be thousands of these examples available in the future. (Within 3 years according to the CHART attached.)
This is not child but rather old husband and wife in 70′s.
WBC detected 20,000Bq of Cesium in their body.There are clear evidences and scientific analysis of the mechanism. Your DNA is continuously injured and tapestry of diseases overwhelms your body. CANCER is NOT the point at all. All we care is QOL(Quality Of Life) for 20-30 years and GENERATIONS. This (The Internal Emitter damages all the DNA’s not only human, but trees, grasses, insects, birds, animals, fishes…EVERY LIFE and Environments. These are well clarified by the famous “Chernobyl” of NY Academy of Sciences, 2009 and the “cited 150,000 references” from Belarus, Chernobyl, Ukraine and all the European countries.)20,000Bq in Body detected.
below: 7 years -old boy who lived in Aizuwakamatsu at that time which the Fukushima nuclear power plant exploded:

Background: 9/11 from last year:


Why children should be screened:




Japanese IPPNW members support the pro nuclear, anti human term “Radiophobia” (made by IAEA):

“The biggest problem is the fear of radiation and psychological stress. Stress itself,
and failure due to stress or alcohol” – QUOTE by japanese IPPNW: http://www.hiroshima.med.or.jp/ippnw/sokuho/docs/2150_006.pdf
Nearly nothing about Fukushima, Chernobyl and nuclear energy in general, at the IPPNW 2012 Congress in Hiroshima:
1 out of 1,000,000 Children once had thyroid cancer – and today, because of radiation More and More a developing it!
ICRP Publication109(2007) Recommendation、”Emergent radiation status” which determines, “20mSv~100mSv/year” .”ICRP Publication 109(2007) for Emergent State:
20mSv-100mSv”They say 20mSv/year is the best thing they can employ (in Japan).
ICRP Publication 109(2007)
Arrangements for emergent exposure situations.
20-100mSv/yearThey employed this recommendation.ICRP Publication 111(2008)
This recommendation lowered the level to
1-20mSv/yearStill MEXT employed the former(109) to admit 20mSv/year.ICRP Publication 109(2007)
neglects internal emitter totally: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/06/01/%e3%83%9f%e3%82%b7%e3%82%a7%e3%83%abfernex-may-12th-2012/by Marnie DawsonWho composes the “test” group? They are the children of Fukushima. They are an involuntary irradiated “test” group monitored since March 2011 displaying disturbing health abnormalities that may ultimately decide the debate on nuclear power, should the global media report it. Fukushima Daiichi has been like a suppurating wound, leaching radionuclides into the environment since March 2011. The sixth report of the Fukushima Prefecture Health Management Survey, revealed after the survey examined 38,114 local children that 36 percent of Fukushima children have abnormal thyroid growths. The Fukushima Prefecture Health Management Survey revealed that 13,460 children, or 35.3 percent, had thyroid cysts or nodules up to 0.197 inches long growing on their thyroids and 0.5 percent of the children had growths larger than 0.197 inches. So, why might this be significant? According to the American Thyroid Association (ATA), thyroid problems from nuclear events occur when radioactive iodine is leaked into the atmosphere and thyroid cells that absorb too much of this radioactive iodine may become cancerous, with children being particularly susceptible. Furthermore, the ATA reports noted that thyroid cancer “seems to be the only cancer whose incidence rises after a radioactive iodine release” and that that babies and children are at highest risk. The National Institute of Radiological Sciences conclusions refute the government’s assertion that Japanese children in effect received zero thyroid radiation doses from Fukushima. Fukushima children’s health, the news just gets worse. Two months ago Tokyo Shinbum reported that 60 percent of Fukushima children under 12 have tested positive for diabetes, according to Dr. Miura, the director of Iwase’s general hospital. Why, possibly? Because the Strontium-90 radioactive isotope quickly decays to become Yttrium-90, which can concentrate in the pancreas, causing pancreatic cancer or diabetes. Two major nuclear disasters in less than 40 years….Thousands of children continue to suffer because of it. In Japan and around Chernobyl http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ujAG_Ofj4M Do we want more children to suffer when the next nuclear accident happens? As responsible adults can we continue to let this happen? Another report on the kids of Fukushima: http://www.eelamenews.com/?p=100126 Data above taken from this report: http://www.techwireasia.com/3754/fukushima-local-children-unwitting-and-unwilling-radioactive-guinea-pigs/
with kind regards,
Jan Hemmer

Read Full Post »


- Radionuclides

- produced by every reactor – released by every reactor chminey

- collected by every soil – collected by every food – eaten by every animal and human

- collected in every organism, every organ, fetus – collecting, collecting, collecting,

with every gram of food.


It’s not air, it’s not natural radiation. It’s in food (70 – 90 %)

Short half lifes have no meaning.

Permanent radionuclide supplies in small quantities, summing up over years and decades. In our children.

Latency. Full effect in each generation. During each generation, at least one radiation shock (Chernobyl, Fukushima).

Thus, new generations always have lower tolerance for radiation and simple infections, disease, they become more mortal. The purpose of procreation to produce healthier offspring disappears.

Soon, the tolerance is so low that the normal natural radiation is sufficient enough to destroy more and more of the generations.

>> Tritium mimics hydrogen (body cells) – natural tritium increased by reactor tritium millions of times.

>> Radio-Cesium mimics potassium (heart) – radionuclide did not exist before atomic age.

>> Radio-Strontium mimics calcium (bones) – radionuclide did not exist before atomic age.

>> Radio-Iodine mimics Iodine (thyroid gland -> brain of fetus) – radionuclide did not exist before atomic age.

Working for the destruction of mankind: IAEA, UNSCEAR, WHO, BEIR, NRC, ICRP, health ministries, reactor operators, regulatory authorities, with or without knowledge.

Now you are with.

Jan Hemmer

More: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/02/18/every-year-twice-chernobyl/ and: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/03/02/mother-how-much-radiation-%E3%81%8A%E6%AF%8D%E3%81%95%E3%82%93%EF%BC%81%E3%81%A9%E3%81%AE%E3%81%8F%E3%82%89%E3%81%84%E3%81%AE%E6%94%BE%E5%B0%84%E7%B7%9A%EF%BC%9F-2/

Read Full Post »


The Reactor pressure vessel  (RPV) is around the core with the reactor fuel: http://www.nuclearevents.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/fukushima-reactor-building-containment-110314d-021.jpeg

The Fukushima containment is indeed closed under pressure, unlike Chernobyl, which had no containment. This means that the force of an explosion would actually be greater in Fukushima. If the reactor operator let#s out pressure, it decreases the possible risk of an explosion, but sets free unbelievable amounts of curie / radionuclides.

This is the problem of Western reactors: The control rods are made of a material -> cadmium-silver-indium. If something goes wrong, the control rods melt first. It is likely that the control rods are rather lost than the core. – says Ross Hesketh, a nuclear scientist, ON PDF PAGE 42 HERE: http://wilpfinternational.org/publications/Tchernobyl_consequences.pdf

Normal reactor inventory: http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/inventory-reactor-beznau2.jpg

Screenshot here: http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/control-rods-western-reacto.jpg

The control rods are made of

>> cadmium (melting point: 321.07 °C, 594.22 K, 609.93 °F)

>> silver (961°C) 1234.93 K, 1763.2 °F)

>> indium (156°C 429.7485 K, 313.8773 °F)

>> The cladding (zirconium), which they found in parts outside the plant: 1857 °C

Melting point of the UO² fuel: 2800°C.

If something goes wrong, the control rods melt first.

They are NOT in the reactor 2 video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3Vdiwg6c5o

Then the cladding melts, then the reactor fuel melts.

Radioactive Silver was found in japanese fish: http://www.cnn.com/2012/02/22/world/asia/japan-fukushima-pacific/index.html

when they found zirconium outside the plant they told the public, that it is from the spent fuel. http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/science/news/20110325-OYT1T00127.htm Spent fuel = diversionary tactic.
TEPCO admits reactor fuel left containment – how can that be, if the containment is not destroyed? ANSWER: Pressure cooker system, with a valve / pipe.

quote from pro TEPCO article: http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ201112010004As for the No. 2 and No. 3 reactors, most of the melted fuel stayed within the pressure vessel, TEPCO added.” THEY ADMIT, that Fuel left the containment, but the containment stayed stable. Does this mean that fuel can (I think) evaporize and leave the containment?

UO² reactor fuel can evaporate: http://books.google.de/books?id=9hCLf0u5YUgC&pg=PA21&lpg=PA21&dq=uranium+oxyde+evaporate&source=bl&ots=ctDqVJHxlU&sig=Ht3rYnNJ-tXHZlHU4ibwiVS7Amk&hl=de&sa=X&ei=3Vg2T5yLNYem0AXSpZS3Ag&ved=0CCYQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=evaporate&f=false

And the United Nations ended their study about the health effects under 1 year after the fukushima explosions. ONE YEAR is enough for them. Even the UN’s own WHO says a cancer patient has to survive 5 years to be called “cured” (although the patient might die after 6 or more years). This is not science. This is nuclear holocaust: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/05/21/u-n-launches-study-of-japan-nuclear-crisis-results-directly-influenced-by-atomic-industry/

The term “pressure cooker” is used for the new advanced boiling water reactor (Fukushima’s successor) AP 1000 -> HERE: http://fairewinds.com/content/ap-1000-press-conference-%E2%80%93-technical-statement IAEA advises TEPCO to renew the radionuclide “lie 1986″, for nearly 26 years IAEA lies to us about the remaining fuel in reactor 4. Most of it was Blown out and the same now has probably happened in reactor(s) in Fukushima.

Vaporizing UO² fuel is an old hat. It’s called PUREX (pro nuclear sites: http://www.ne.doe.gov/pdfFiles/i-neri2005AnnualReport.pdf) http://world-nuclear.org/info/inf69.html) and used for the atomic weapons program. The know-how was given to reprocessing facilites. Of course, there is no nitric acid IN the containment like in La Hague, or Sellafield.

1,555,036,000,000,000 Becquerel (water & air) = 42000 Curie. Source: EdF France http://energie.edf.com/fichiers/fckeditor/Commun/En_Direct_Centrales/Nucleaire/Centrales/Fessenheim/Publications/documents/Umwelt%20&%20Strahlenschutz_Juli_August2011.pdf 1,850,000 Becquerel into air – Source: GE USA: http://tekknorg.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/ge-ari2.jpg It can reach 0,01 – 0,02 Curie per Second from Reactor Chimney and even 0,05 Curie – which are 1,600,000 Curie per Year: “Radioactive Pollution Control in Minnesota, Final Report for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency – by by Ernest Tsivogloue”. https://www.osti.gov/opennet/detail.jsp?osti_id=16313726&query_id=0


On PDF Page 59 of TEPCO document 1-8 we find: 4 x 10 mSv PER HOUR at a distance of 0,28 km: http://www.scribd.com/doc/88568685/%E7%A6%8F%E5%B3%B6%E7%AC%AC%E4%B8%80%E5%8E%9F%E7%99%BA%E4%BA%8B%E6%95%85%E7%9B%B4%E5%BE%8C%E3%81%8B%E3%82%89%E3%81%AE%E7%8F%BE%E5%A0%B4%E3%81%A8%E6%94%BF%E5%BA%9C%E3%81%AE%E3%82%84%E3%82%8A%E5%8F%96%E3%82%8AFAX1-8 – which is exactly the the 400 mSv PER HOUR mentioned in this NRC correspondence on PDF page 15 (“There was a media report of a 40-rem dose measured somewhere near the plant.”): http://www.houseoffoust.com/fukushima/NRCFOIA/ML12052A106.pdf in my view, this speaks for brutal high radiation, if we take into account, that the air even weakens the concentration. This is 10 times the daily dose at a 1000 Curie per km² area, for example near Chernobyl reactor 4 / hot sport, with 37 mio becquerel per m² (map): http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/Chernobyl-map.jpg and I _think_ this speaks for the lost inventory of containment and inventory. Because it is also reactor fuel, that is all over there (494 Kg of Plutonium 239 was in the burnup fuel of Chernobyl): Page 6 right top: http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/Artikel%20zu%20Tschernobyl%20in%20Nuclear%20Technology%20Vol%2090.pdf
According to KAWATA Toumio, Fellow of the Nuclear Waste Management Organization of Japan (NUMO), all reactor inventory of Fukushima Reactor 2 was released on March 14th 2011, 6:22 pm: http://www.strahlentelex.de/Stx_11_588_S01-02.pdf

“During normal reactor operation subcooled water enters the fuel bundle from the lower plenum and experiences heating from the fuel rods. There are three different types of boiling heat transfer to water in forced convection systems: nucleate boiling, which is an extremely efficient mode of heat transfer, allowing large quantities of heat to be transferred with a very small temperature rise at the heated wall. As heat transfer rate is increased the boiling transfer surface alternates between film and nucleate boiling, leading to fluctuations in heated wall temperatures. The point of departure from the nucleate boiling region into the transition boiling region is called the boiling transition. Transition boiling begins at the critical power, and is characterized by fluctuations in cladding surface temperature. Stable film boiling occurs at the highest heat transfer rates; it begins as transition boiling comes to an end. Film boiling heat transfer is characterized by wall temperatures which are significantly higher than those experienced during nucleate boiling.” page 17: http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1002/ML100220484.pdf and “early boiling transition to within one second. This level of accuracy is acceptable because the conditions at dryout are not changing rapidly enough within one second to significantly alter the post dryout behavior. This provides reasonable assurance that TASC can be used to predict early boiling transition” page 8 http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1002/ML100220484.pdf full archive: http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1002

possible temperatures in a reactor: 4000 – 5000 ° K: http://books.google.de/books?id=oEqd0IeAhccC&pg=PA6&hl=de&source=gbs_selected_pages&cad=3#v=snippet&q=4000&f=false these temperatures ionize steam into hydrogen and oxygen and are no longer chemical but nuclear. the file above is the OFFICIAL british statement.

To IAEA: Stop calling the situation “under control” – because you lost inventory! End the lies! For 26 years you are LYING to the world, telling us, that still 95 % of the Chernobyl reactor fuel is in reactor 4.

Reason: If 95% are IN the reactor, you can say “only” 50 million curie left the reactor. This is the connection: Excluding the possibility of an atomic explosion in an reactor leads to the comclusion that ONLY 5% (50 mio. Curie) left the reactor. That not much fuel can leave a reactor in general. But the violence of the explosions in Chernobyl was 1,2 Terrajoule – the maximum of a chemical reaction is 50 Gigajoule. This is the spanish analysis of Martinez-Val: http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/Artikel%20zu%20Tschernobyl%20in%20Nuclear%20Technology%20Vol%2090.pdf So, it is possible that a) a reactor destroys itself and b) loses all it’s inventory – by 1) explosion / power burst (without containment: Chernobyl) or by 2) short melting process and dissolving fuel process – and pressure drain (with containment: Fukushima).

Chernobyl: Radiation emission was no less that 80% of the core (with a total of 192 tons) – If we divide the figure by the population of the whole earth then we get 1 Curie per person – or 3,7 billion becquerel. http://www.ratical.org/radiation/Chernobyl/ChernobylIftI.html

5 billion curie left the reactor. And every year we have 2 Chernobyl catastrophes by 400 reactors operating: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/02/18/every-year-twice-chernobyl/

Chernobyl’s not welded lid (weight, according to Russians: 2,000 tons) was a safety valve.

Nearly no fuel left in Chernobyl 4 reactor – footage, interviews, starting at 07:55: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CgCydo5Y2sA&feature=related IAEA lies to us since 1986.

EVIDENCE: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zP5neBujiFU&feature=related The containment has to keep the core inside. Yes, but not in every physical state, it seems. And the man who was inside reactor 4 more than 500 times, “Checherov” said there is no radioactive fuel left in the reactor and that a nuclear explosion took place at the reactor, which vaporized the fuel at a temperature of 40000°C (72032°F) Source: http://www.springerlink.com/content/5tr8g6u3v5acxa4r/

explaination: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/11/12/the-atomic-reactor-explosions-of-fukushima-and-chernobyl/

From Xavier Nast :

“Since the beginning, the reports through the conventional media are antonymic.
It means that the authorities knee from the 14th March 2011how much Plutonium are travelling through the atmosphere, contaminating certainly a large place in Japan but also the complete Northern hemisphere. For this reason it is possible to understand now the policy of Japanese government was to shut up the main comprehensive stages, and to give only the secondary information. But also it is possible to understand the closing of all nuclear plant. Now everybody has just to hope random is benefit for himself and their children, because scholastic effects will hit people more and more like after Chernobyl.
I am leaving in an area where Chernobyl cloud hot particles have met a wet atmosphere and the rains have brought down the plums of radio nuclides and contaminated soils and food.
In 25 years I lost 29 people younger as 50 years old from various cancers, people from my family, friends, colleagues, old fellows, neighbors. This one, a lot people from Europe inside a circle of 1000 miles from Chernobyl, has observed the same facts. Oncologists knee the facts and the main cause but they are not allowed to talk. But new cancers are increasing every year and one conclusion is that occurring of detection of those new cancers are 4 times higher that before 1985.
Since 1960 every nuclear physician knows that plutonium is a hyper poison inside a human an animal and vegetable.
Today we will start to understand those old theories. What is surprising is the total deny of former and various experiences, lies of the political responsibles and apathy of the mass?

Ask you just one question: Where is the storage pool of nuclear M.OX fuel from unit n°3?
Have you seen pictures? Have you heart if the water level isn’t still correct? What is M.OX?
You could imagine easily the consequences of Fukushima if you have understood those of Chernobyl, just to imagine the factor between both of them. This is the question? 0.1 , 1 , 10 or more?”

by Stella Blackwell Steinbach

Number of fuel assemblies

In the reactor

400 unit 1

548 unit 2

548 unit 3

? unkown..loading was in progress unit 4

548 unit 5

764 unit 6

Spent fuel assemblies in the spent fuel pool

292 unit 1

587 unit 2

514 U-238 and 20-ish? 10+yrs/old PU-239 rods unit 3

1,331 U-238 & MOX 40 PU-239 Breeder rods unit 4

946unit 5

876 unit 6

New fuel assemblies in the spent fuel pool

100 unit 1

28 unit 2

52 unit 3

204 unit 4

48 unit 5

64 unit 6

Common Spent Fuel Pool

6300 fuel assemblies

by Pattie L. Brassard

Originally… the PU-239 rods in Reactor 4 stood about a foot out of the rack there in the center… unmarked. The don’t have handles, and used a ” C-Clamp ” type bit with pins on sides to lift them and move them. They have burned-off to the point that they are now recessed into the rack. #3 pool had a PU-239 detonation… the age of the plutonium meant 30% of the rods were PU-240 & 241… the PU-240 is what made the nuclear blast fizzle-out. Same goes for the corium of #3 when it hit the water table. There IS NO spent pool on #3 anymore! Its contents burned, shattered, and / or was arisolized in the blast. The rods remaining were thrown all over the ground aroud the buildings.They are now piled / stored in large ” totes ‘ over to the south west of reactor buildings. They thought it was reactor that blew-out.. and used choppers to dump water.. what’s left of the pool maybe holds a foot or two of water now? The pool blast had removed the yellow ‘ CAP ‘ from #3 reactor… but the corium was already gone… and the ‘ plug ‘ on the PCV was still on.. but cracked.. and pissing-out steam. the following day that second in-ground criticality happened.. it tossed the plug way over onto the south-west driveway to the gate !!! And that’s when the real black smoke started to pour out of #3 building. It also ignited the gasses in #4.. methane in lower levels (damaged pool supports) and hydrogen from the now dry contents of the open-top reactor core of #4 – It was being loaded when the quake hit.


Read Full Post »

Older Posts »


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 71 other followers