Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Shinichi Yamashita’

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

The Invisible blurs the causality.
The Symptom dresses up as Cause.

fear-rad

Protection against Fear, not against Radiation!

quote from the latest nuclear gag contract:
Contract between IAEA and Fukushima Medical University (“Dr” Yamashita)
“…the IAEA will endeavour to organize conferences, seminars and workshops, in cooperation with the University, with the aim of enhancing public awareness of radiological effects on human health and addressing the issue of “radiation fear” and post-traumatic stress disorders in the Fukushima population…” http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/energy/fukushima_2012/pdfs/fukushima_iaea_en_06.pdf

basis for this gag contract was the first one, quote:

“it is recognized by the World Health Organization that the International Atomic Energy Agency has the primary responsibility for encouraging, assisting and coordinating research and development and practical application of atomic energy for peaceful uses throughout the world without prejudice to the right of the World Health Organization to concern itself with promoting, developing, assisting and coordinating international health work, including research, in all its aspects.” http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/Others/inf20.shtml#note_c

fake-aid

radiation fear = Radiophobia – a non medical term: “What’s worse, the IAEA is going public these days with statements ridiculing the so called “radiophobia” of the population and calling for an end of aid programs, which, according to the IAEA report of 2005, only serve to instil a victim mentality in a totally healthy population – a claim not only cynical, but potentially dangerous for the health of the affected population.” Source: http://www.ippnw-students.org/chernobyl/coverup.html

“Presently the international organizations (WHO, IAEA) recognize as the main cause of increase of thyroid cancer in liquidators and children population after the accident their irradiation with radioactive iodine, I-131. The rest of diseases, they suppose, are provoked by psycho-emotional reactions..” (!!!…RADIOPHOBIA…!!!) There is no linear dose effect correlation, but “The bimodal dependence of effects on dose was revealed for all studied parameters. Namely, effects increased at low doses, reached maximum (for low doses), then decreased (in some cases the effect sign reversed) and thereafter increased with the increase of dosage”: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Burlakova.pdf

slow-doses-stress

THE RESULT: The new IAEA Killer Agenda: http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/pressreleases/2012/prn201234.html

IAEA invites people to come back to Fukushima. Wth kind support of the local and national authorities, the World Health Organisation, and the Fukushima Medical University. Irradiated ares will become cheap Land. Very attractive.

This IAEA program means: Resettlement of people in irradiated areas, “overcoming” the situation by ignoring the situation, Rehabilitation means: Restoration. NOT of the people, but of the IRRADIATED land, into “normality”. Radiation is forced ON the people, INTO the people, by calling it normality, and encouraging the people to come back.

This program is fed by the IAEA annual budget of over 300 millon EUR and by the nuclear industry: http://www.iaea.org/About/budget.html

while the WHO relies on Sponsoring…

“According to its statutes, the IAEA (a UN agency which reports to the Security Council) is mandated to “to accelerate and enlarge the contribution of atomic energy to peace, health and prosperity throughout the world”. It is in fact a lobby, industrial and military, which should have no role to play in public health policymaking or research.” http://mondediplo.com/2008/04/14who

whoiaeawha WHOIAEA01 cheap-death

MORE: IAEA protects against Truth and irradiates People

MORE: Japan goes the same way as Belarus: Dictatorship – a deep insight

MORE: Margaret Chan VERSUS World Health Organisation

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

My footage from Correction of History: Forum on Radioprotection May 12 – 13 Geneva by independent WHO.org

Matsui Eisuke (Japan) specialist in respiratory diseases and low dose radiation, Director, Medical Institute of Environment at Gifu. Abstracts here: page 12: http://independentwho.org/media/Documents_IW/Forum_Radioprotection_English_Abstracts_IW_2012.pdf

The accident of TEPCO’s Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant caused serious harm. Vast areas have been contaminated with radiation, and the lives of a large number of people are threatened. The major effects of radiation from the accident are caused by internal exposure by inhaling or ingesting food and drink. In measuring the doses of exposure to radiation, the government and its professional advisors have relied mainly on gamma rays which are easy to detect. But, in terms of internal radiation exposure, beta and alpha rays have a far more serious effect than gamma rays. The government and TEPCO hardly measure such isotopes as beta emitting strontium90
or alpha emitting plutonium239.

They have been deliberately ignoring the characteristics of internal exposure. Behind this lie the nuclear strategies and nuclear power policies of the United States. Influenced by these policies, international organizations such as the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) were established. They have relied on the research by Radiation Effects Research Foundation which has been ignoring the effect of radiation exposures from fallouts of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Atomic bombs. With regard to the Fukushima accident they make such claims as “there is no statistically significant evidence to prove that the radiation doses under 100mSv cause diseases”,
and continue to cover up the real facts on the effects of exposure to radiation.

What is now needed is the promotion of truly scientific studies about the effects of radiation on the human body that are based on facts and actual radiation exposures including internal exposure, and not on policies that promote nuclear weapons and pronuclear power. This is an international issue and a task for all human kind. And it is now required that the effects of the Fukushima accident are to be dealt with scientifically and democratically from the viewpoint of citizens. This includes appropriate measures to protect food and drink from radiation contamination, compensation for the damage, and safeguards so that people can live and work without radiation exposure. The right of every citizen to live safely must be recognized. For this, we must establish the sovereignty of the people who are rightly provided with correct information about radiation exposure.

MORE: “a fourth new dosimetry, DS02, with refined shielding estimate, and changes both in the locations of the epicenters and the yield of the bombs. Studies based on the DS02 dosimetry will now replace all previous research findings. All atomic bomb research dating prior to 2002 is now inadmissible science.” http://ratical.org/radiation/Chernobyl/CaUFtH.html / “Hiroshima basis of risk model flawed because the study and control groups were not representative of a normal population.” / “ICRP basis of risk assessment is undemocratic and biased by the membership and historic provenance of the Committee” / “Hiroshima and all other bases of risk model unable to inform on risk from internal exposure due to averaging and other errors implicit in the units of exposure.” / “Hiroshima base of risk model did not include contribution from internal exposure from fallout or residual contamination as controls were exposed to fallout” / “Units of exposure themselves (Sieverts) contain inappropriate value judgments and are not physical units” Beginning @ PAGE 50: http://www.euradcom.org/2011/ecrr2010.pdf – and about RERF: http://www.facebook.com/notes/chernobyl-children-fukushima-children/the-criminality-of-japans-radiation-effects-researchers/214827511939220 / THE NEW COVER UP STUDY BY RERF: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22171960

TEPCO / IAEA’s Cover Up (CTBTO):

http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/05/28/iaea-conceales-ctbto-fukushima-data/

http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/02/25/100m%C2%B2-near-fukushima-plant-78-times-chernobyl-evac-zone/

Jan Hemmer

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

The 100 Millisievert Threshold Lie http://www.strahlentelex.de/The_100_Millisievert_Threshold_Lie_Statement_German_GSS.pdf

Thyroid Cancer & the crime of the IAEA: www.youtube.com/watch?v=lvNR8VtVJpU

How the IAEA actively endangers the health of children

Position Statement: What Is Currently Happening to Fukushima Children? http://fukushimavoice-eng.blogspot.fr/2012/07/position-statement-what-is-currently.html

Children’s thyroid cancer is (was) an extremely uncommon “disease” (mutation). It’s world spontaneous rate doesn’t exceed 1 – 2 cases per 1 million: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/03/04/japanese-children-cancer-outlook-children-need-absolutely-clean-food/

Me speaking @ Correction of History: Forum on Radioprotection May 12 – 13 Geneva by independent WHO.org

Councilor of radiation is led by a pharmaceutical company and ICRP http://fukushima-diary.com/2012/02/councilor-of-radiation-is-led-by-a-pharmaceutical-company-and-icrp/

The Latest of Yamashita and Fukushima Medical University: http://www.cataloghouse.co.jp/2012spring/yomimono/yamashita/index.html – translation by Kitagawa Takashi:

“Complete set of what Dr.Yamashita think about Fukushima children.

This interview reveals what the Yamashita thik about Fukushima Children.
His definite belief:
1. There’s no scientific evidence that radioactive dose less than 100mSv/year has something to do with disease including cancer.
2. The only desease which has something to do is thyloid cancer.
3. It take at least 5years to detect thyloid cancer for children, and 20 years for adults.
4. So it’s enough to examine all the children within 5 years. (Actually he will check within 2 and half years for children under heavy dose)
5. There’s no children with thyloid cancer detected so far. Zero. No problem.

This is fundamental attitude of Japan Academy of Nuclear Health related Association and Foundations and IAEA, NRC, ANSER, etc. Nothing has changed. No lower dose. Without scientific evidence of caused by radioactive, there’s no responsibility, no suit, no payment, namely no problem. If something happend, it’s due to something else, which they call it radio-phobia.
(That’s exacrly what they did in Hiroshima and Chernovyl)

This interview is very rare, done by a mail order business.
Usually NIRS and RERF(formally ABCC) never accept interview.
They reject Chernovyl report(NY Academic Press) and related research work as Non Scientific.
MEXT(Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology) follows them and teach all the children “Smile, Don’t mind it, No problem”.

About 20mSv/year on the playgroud of junior high, the IAEA standarad in emergency state is clarified that 100mSv-20mSv. So they(Committee formed by the Government) say “We take the most strict and severe level for the safety for chldren, namely 20mSv/year”. There’s official record for this decision making.”

It is widely accepted that the A-bomb survivors’ data are an unsatisfactory basis for estimating the effects of internal contamination. As early as 1953, data were available to falsify assumptions that there is a 7-year time lag between exposure and the onset of leukaemia, that there was no fallout or residual radiation at Hiroshima and Nagasaki and that there were no heritable defects in those who were exposed xxiv and hence to falsify a risk model based on those assumptions. Since the Radiation Effects Research Foundation controls were as contaminated as the study group it has been possible to reanalyze RERF data to show whether there are health effects in the controls attributable to fallout. Busby has shown that UNSCEAR reported high leukaemia rates in the Hiroshima controls relative to all Japan. Sternglass attributed to fallout the dramatic increase in cancer rates in children which was recorded all over Japan between three and five years after the Abombings. RERF data have been reanalyzed to show disturbances of sex ratio in  live births.” http://cnic.jp/

http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr139/pdf/watanabe.pdf

Background:

Dr. Shinichi Yamashita + Fukushima Mecial University are Japan’s CORE of Pro Nuclear Health Care:

http://fukushima-diary.com/2012/06/tokyo-womens-medical-university-hospital-we-are-told-not-to-give-radiation-inspection-by-the-gov/#.T9Br2r4__7s.twitter

http://tanakaryusaku.jp/2012/06/0004412

http://fukushimavoice-eng.blogspot.de/2012/05/fukushima-childrens-thyroid-examination.html

http://fukushima-diary.com/2012/04/yamashita-banned-recording-findings-suggestive-of-thyroid-nodule/

http://fukushima-diary.com/2012/05/futaba-town-mayor-fukushima-medical-university-stops-us-from-having-exposure-test/

http://fukushima-diary.com/2012/06/yamashita-admits-he-exaggerated-the-safety-of-under-100msvy/

“ The problem is the control over medical experts in Fukushima. They have to follow infamous Dr. Shunichi Yamashita, who is a governmentally supported nuclear medical care expert, who says that a child can be exposed to 100 milliSV of radiation yearly. An ad by a clinic in local papers says, “Breast milk is safe”. Many concerns are expressed, but only in anecdotal ways because we cannot acquire any good information since the Japanese government excluded Fukushima from its annual health monitoring. If somebody goes to a clinic, she or he will see obvious sign languages among staffed nurses saying “Shshhh…don’t tell them!” It’s all about “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”. We need investigation, and need to accumulate data from people in Fukushima for the use of people. With the clinic project, we also want to promote psychological care for people who are suffering with this anxiety.”
–Chieko Shiina at The Peace and Resouce Center of San Diego, July 7th, 2012 http://www.clinic-fukushima.jp/
 Accelerating CHILDREN KILL: Dr Suzuki also claimed it is unlikely thyroid cancer rates would rise and that the results found so far where over 43% of children had abnormalities were “ordinary”: http://www.simplyinfo.org/?p=8220 If the thyroid gland does not work correctly. the fetus is going to suffer
Protection against Fear, not against Radiation!
Contract between IAEA and Fukushima Medical Universitys (“Dr” Yamashita)
“…the IAEA will endeavour to organize conferences, seminars and workshops, in cooperation with the University, with the aim of enhancing public awareness of radiological effects on human health and addressing the issue of “radiation fear” and post-traumatic stress disorders in the Fukushima population…”
http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/energy/fukushima_2012/pdfs/fukushima_iaea_en_06.pdf

it is recognized by the World Health Organization that the International Atomic Energy Agency has the primary responsibility for encouraging, assisting and coordinating research and development and practical application of atomic energy for peaceful uses throughout the world without prejudice to the right of the World Health Organization to concern itself with promoting, developing, assisting and coordinating international health work, including research, in all its aspects.http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/Others/inf20.shtml#note_c

http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2013/11/27/iaea-protects-against-truth-and-irradiates-people/

NEWS: info by Yoshimasa Kitsunai
May 7 (part) 2011 Video Professor Shunichi Yamashita answer questions
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWhzpfeHhZw“There is no way of taking responsibility,” Shunichi Yamashita
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tj3oiukC8HA&feature=related

Back of the governor Yuhei Sato, Shunichi Yamashita remarks “safe to 100mSv” [Ban]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZMYiN-RyTfo&feature=related
The biggest risk is the “Internal Emitter” which is totally different from external radiation as IAEA, ICRP, UNSCER, RERF, NIRS of MEXT asserts that less than 100mSv is uncertain.It is KNOWN Internal Emitter of lower dose ACCUMELATES.
Even IAEA admit this in the Publication 111.(Evidence is the Picture Attached. See this carefully, No doubt. Continuous Lower dose accumulates in your body in long time. IN THIS PICTURE 1000 days, less than 3 years.)

Dr.YamaSHITa USES Publication 103 which do not admit this and OUT OF DATE. (This is really, really CHEAP TRICK.)Possible fact is revealed by a doctor of Fukushima.
There’ll be thousands of these examples available in the future. (Within 3 years according to the CHART attached.)
This is not child but rather old husband and wife in 70′s.
WBC detected 20,000Bq of Cesium in their body.There are clear evidences and scientific analysis of the mechanism. Your DNA is continuously injured and tapestry of diseases overwhelms your body. CANCER is NOT the point at all. All we care is QOL(Quality Of Life) for 20-30 years and GENERATIONS. This (The Internal Emitter damages all the DNA’s not only human, but trees, grasses, insects, birds, animals, fishes…EVERY LIFE and Environments. These are well clarified by the famous “Chernobyl” of NY Academy of Sciences, 2009 and the “cited 150,000 references” from Belarus, Chernobyl, Ukraine and all the European countries.)20,000Bq in Body detected.
http://fukushima-diary.com/2012/08/20000-bqbody-from-a-man-in-fukushima/#.UB3znFE_P6Y.facebok
below: 7 years -old boy who lived in Aizuwakamatsu at that time which the Fukushima nuclear power plant exploded:
CLICK ON PHOTO:

Background: 9/11 from last year:

http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/09/10/this-years-911-will-be-japans-2nd-fukushima-warning/

Why children should be screened:

http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/03/04/japanese-children-cancer-outlook-children-need-absolutely-clean-food/

http://onodekita.sblo.jp/article/55872777.html

http://vivretchernobyl.blogspot.de/2008/09/goncharova-r-i-health-effects-of.html

Japanese IPPNW members support the pro nuclear, anti human term “Radiophobia” (made by IAEA):

“The biggest problem is the fear of radiation and psychological stress. Stress itself,
and failure due to stress or alcohol” – QUOTE by japanese IPPNW: http://www.hiroshima.med.or.jp/ippnw/sokuho/docs/2150_006.pdf
Nearly nothing about Fukushima, Chernobyl and nuclear energy in general, at the IPPNW 2012 Congress in Hiroshima:
1 out of 1,000,000 Children once had thyroid cancer – and today, because of radiation More and More a developing it!
ICRP Publication109(2007) Recommendation、”Emergent radiation status” which determines, “20mSv~100mSv/year” .”ICRP Publication 109(2007) for Emergent State:
20mSv-100mSv”They say 20mSv/year is the best thing they can employ (in Japan).
ICRP Publication 109(2007)
7.1.5
Arrangements for emergent exposure situations.
20-100mSv/yearThey employed this recommendation.ICRP Publication 111(2008)
This recommendation lowered the level to
1-20mSv/yearStill MEXT employed the former(109) to admit 20mSv/year.ICRP Publication 109(2007)
neglects internal emitter totally: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/06/01/%e3%83%9f%e3%82%b7%e3%82%a7%e3%83%abfernex-may-12th-2012/by Marnie DawsonWho composes the “test” group? They are the children of Fukushima. They are an involuntary irradiated “test” group monitored since March 2011 displaying disturbing health abnormalities that may ultimately decide the debate on nuclear power, should the global media report it. Fukushima Daiichi has been like a suppurating wound, leaching radionuclides into the environment since March 2011. The sixth report of the Fukushima Prefecture Health Management Survey, revealed after the survey examined 38,114 local children that 36 percent of Fukushima children have abnormal thyroid growths. The Fukushima Prefecture Health Management Survey revealed that 13,460 children, or 35.3 percent, had thyroid cysts or nodules up to 0.197 inches long growing on their thyroids and 0.5 percent of the children had growths larger than 0.197 inches. So, why might this be significant? According to the American Thyroid Association (ATA), thyroid problems from nuclear events occur when radioactive iodine is leaked into the atmosphere and thyroid cells that absorb too much of this radioactive iodine may become cancerous, with children being particularly susceptible. Furthermore, the ATA reports noted that thyroid cancer “seems to be the only cancer whose incidence rises after a radioactive iodine release” and that that babies and children are at highest risk. The National Institute of Radiological Sciences conclusions refute the government’s assertion that Japanese children in effect received zero thyroid radiation doses from Fukushima. Fukushima children’s health, the news just gets worse. Two months ago Tokyo Shinbum reported that 60 percent of Fukushima children under 12 have tested positive for diabetes, according to Dr. Miura, the director of Iwase’s general hospital. Why, possibly? Because the Strontium-90 radioactive isotope quickly decays to become Yttrium-90, which can concentrate in the pancreas, causing pancreatic cancer or diabetes. Two major nuclear disasters in less than 40 years….Thousands of children continue to suffer because of it. In Japan and around Chernobyl http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ujAG_Ofj4M Do we want more children to suffer when the next nuclear accident happens? As responsible adults can we continue to let this happen? Another report on the kids of Fukushima: http://www.eelamenews.com/?p=100126 Data above taken from this report: http://www.techwireasia.com/3754/fukushima-local-children-unwitting-and-unwilling-radioactive-guinea-pigs/
with kind regards,
Jan Hemmer

Read Full Post »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 71 other followers