Immortal Fukushima

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

Plutonium 241 (147 years decay time) decays into Americium 241 (4,000 years decay time) decays into Neptunium 237 (22,000,000 years decay time)…

Nuclear reactors are more effective than nuclear bombs. They hide their nature through the production of steam. 26 years ago, when Chernobyl released it’s inventory (95% or more), the meaning of nuclear war was changed, at least for us. Some groups knew it all the time, probably the ones who worked out eugenics. But we thought in conventional terms. A single reactor explosion is a nuclear war in terms of radionuclides.

This is Chernobyl compared to the 2,000 atomic bomb tests – according to CTBTO:

CTBTO Chernobyl

The bomb is gone. The reactor stays. And it is designed, “to walk into it’s doom”:

This is only the radiation shock. But it is stretched in time. Programmed into DNA. Ignored by IAEA, WHO, UNSCEAR, BEIR, ICRP: http://independentwho.org/fr/

And there are no crater.

Only holes.

In Children’s hearts.

http://www.bellona.org/english_import_area/international/russia/envirorights/info_access/29685

Fukushima’s focus is on soil AND sea.

The place where we came from.

Turritopsis nutricula is a immortal jellyfish http://www.sciencepub.net/nature/ns0802/03_1279_hongbao_turritopsis_ns0802_15_20.pdf

Total release of Fukushima reactor One: 40,000 trilltion becquerel – 70% went into sea: http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ201202290025

http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/02/29/fukushima-rector-1-21000-times-chernobyl/

EDIT 2013: 47 quadrillion becquerels of cesium-137 released into Pacific from Fukushima — Nearly 50 times original Tepco estimate: http://www.biogeosciences-discuss.net/10/4127/2013/bgd-10-4127-2013.html

Plankton takes in 200,000th of a radioactive substance: http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/FUKUSHIMA-SEA-BECQUEREL.jpg

“If the cesium in the fresh water happens to be radioactive cesium-137, from a nuclear reactor or other source, then the fish will contain 1000 times more cesium-137 than the fresh water itself, on a weight-for-weight basis.” Source: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/PP/chp2.html

Cesium 137 activity is 200,000 times higher back waters (!) than before Chernobyl:

Marine Plankton as an Indicator of Low-Level Radionuclide Contamination in the Southern Ocean: http://www.osti.gov/bridge/servlets/purl/6802363-hfGOhq/6802363.pdf

Radioecological Studies on the Plankton of the Cooling Water Reservoir of the Beloyarsk Nuclear Power Plant: http://www.springerlink.com/content/q220n14kl169g207/

POLIKARPOV, G. G. 1966. RADIOECOLOGY of AQUATIC organisms. 281 (PDF page) or respectively on “printed” 292: http://www.osti.gov/bridge/purl.cover.jsp?purl=/5557734-tlwxvK/

Acantharia (Plankton) has a Strontium Skeleton: http://tolweb.org/Acantharia/2385 takes in Radio-Strontium – just as us.

Strontium 90 remains in surface and remobilisation of adsorbed Strontium: http://leeds.academia.edu/IBurke/Papers/1664859/Effect_of_groundwater_pH_and_ionic_strength_on_strontium_sorption_in_aquifer_sediments_Implications_for_90Sr_mobility_at_contaminated_nuclear_sites

Isotopes in Sea Life: http://books.google.de/books?id=4n3wAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA165#v=onepage&q&f=false

Radiation influenced the evolution. 1 mSv per year. If we only increase it by 0.1 mSv, it influences the evolution. The nuclear reactor holocaust is leading the Atomic Darwinism: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/10/01/the-atomic-darwinism/

“Background radiation is also the primary reason why women aged over ~40 are advised not to have children. This is because their stocks of ova have been exposed since birth to 40 or so years’ background radiation and have thereby been damaged to such an extent that an unacceptable proportion, when fertilised, results in congenital malformations, spontaneous abortions or stillbirths. Many scientists also consider that background radiation is the prime factor in the ageing process, and is ultimately the reason why we are not immortal.” PAGE 5 http://www.odwac.gov.on.ca/standards_review/tritium/Tritium_Radiation_Risks_Additional_Note_for_ODWAC_Fairlie.pdf

One natural radionuclide and man made radionclide, for example,  is Tritium, which mimics a substance of life: Hydrogen. It replaces Hydrogen in the body and causes Cancer – after 25 Generations: http://books.google.de/books?hl=de&id=3gUAAAAAMBAJ&q=mice#v=snippet&q=mice&f=false One generation of humans: 25 – 30 years. It takes 30 years for Chernobyl to reach it’s full impact: Kofi Annan: “Not until 2016, at the earliest, will be known the full number of those likely to develop serious medical conditions” because of delayed reactions to radiation exposure, he said: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/Chernobyl/042500.html

Until now, the average  life expectancy was on the rise. But this will be sought from Accelerated Aging. It comes from the increased annual dose.

We get in a year from as much as in 10 years. 10 milli Sievert, for example, 20 in Japan and Belarus. Radiation through food is not included. Food makes 70 – 90% of the radiation – ignored by IAEA, WHO, ICRP, BEIR, UNSCEAR.

Accelerated Aging as a Consequence of the Chernobyl Catastrophe – page 76: http://www.strahlentelex.de/Yablokov%20Chernobyl%20book.pdf

The hope is now: Measurement of food, clean food, measurement of children with Whole Body Counters: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/03/02/mother-how-much-radiation-%e3%81%8a%e6%af%8d%e3%81%95%e3%82%93%ef%bc%81%e3%81%a9%e3%81%ae%e3%81%8f%e3%82%89%e3%81%84%e3%81%ae%e6%94%be%e5%b0%84%e7%b7%9a%ef%bc%9f-2/

“The dangerous thing about the water contamination is that the food chains are much longer there than on land. Among the many steps in the water to accumulate more and more radioactive substances in the organisms. This means that contamination in fish at the end of the food chain is much higher than the water in which they swim” / Radiophobia: “government calls the fears of the people “radiation phobia” = unfounded anxiety before radioactivity. Everyone should just be pretty happy, then they would not get sick. Only sad people would get radiation sickness.” / “The special radiation sensitivity of children is yet not considered.” / “the snow melt began in the mountains. “In the forested mountains the radioactive clouds are stuck, which now come in small streams running down again and causes the rivers to be charged more radioactive” … http://www.n-tv.de/politik/Fukushima-ist-nicht-ueberstanden-article5731966.html

For a clean future! For the Children!

Jan Hemmer

Read Full Post »

Idea for Japan Sea

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

more: http://nemos.org/english/home/

And: How Coal becomes Green: Quote “SunCoal Industries develops, builds and operates facilities that refine organic waste into SunCoal® biocoal with the patented CarboREN® technology, for use in generating bio-energy”: http://www.suncoal.de/en/suncoal-biocoal

 

Read Full Post »

IAEA and TEPCO: The devil is relying on the Bible

Japanese people hear it from Fukshima day One: “Panic and fear of radiation is much worse than radiation itself“

This statement is used by the IAEA for Chernobyl victims.

The IAEA ignores cancer, leukemia, diabetes, trisomy 21, all kinds of illness, all kinds of cancer in connection with radiation, especially low radiation.

The IAEA calls it “Radiophobia”.

The present and future victims are perceived as a disturbance to the atomic industry, to the japanese government, to the companies running atomic plants. They are going to end it.

Since the foundation of the IAEA their purpose is: To serve and protect the atomic industry in these five countries: USA, Russia, China, France, Britain.

They also monopolized public health during and after atomic accidents, by the gag contract WHA 12-40 between them and the WHO (1959). SOURCE

Learn more about the International Atomic Energy Association:

The IAEA, WHO and TEPCO should be a case for the International Criminal Courts

Fukushima and Three Mile Island USA: strategic misinterpretation by the IAEA

Japanese officals and WHO ignore irradiated Japanese Children

IAEA and ICRP – Licence to Kill – ALARA principle

Fukushima: The IAEA strategy

Japan: Additional 252,500 Cancer Cases and Risk for pregnant women

25 Years with FUKUSHIMA

Atomic Industry – Licence to Kill

Life-Upgrade.com

Read Full Post »

WARNING: EU increased limits for irradiated foods higher than after Chernobyl

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

So far had a radioactivity of cesium-134 and cesium-137 have been allowed by a maximum of 600 becquerels per kilogram. Since last weekend the EU limit for food from affected areas in Japan, however, was significantly increased.

Consumer organization FoodWatch (web)and the Environment Institute Munich announced in a joint statement, that:

For example, should fish oil or spices to their previous value to twenty times higher than what corresponds to 12 500 becquerels per kilogram.

The appropriate Emergency Ordinance 297/2011 was on entered into force on March 27th 2011.

Safety standards for Japanese food has been decreased

German Federal Minister of Consumer Aigner contains important information to the public.

This is an act against the health of the people. This is not democratic.

THE E.U. TOOK IT partly BACK: http://www.foodwatch.de/kampagnen__themen/radioaktivitaet/nachrichten/kommissionsentscheidung/index_ger.html
reason: Massive protest of consumer organisations! JAPAN, you can do it also!

http://www.bmelv.de/SharedDocs/Pressemitteilungen/2011/072-EU-Schutzmassnahmen-Japan.html

history says: Atomic accidents lead to higher radiation limits – which stay flexible. Flexible for incrasing the limit:

The ICRP - another profiteer of the atomic industry – made the recommendations for radiation protection norms, which were accepted by all countries, and which justified the set of regulations of the IAEA. Interesting isn’t it? Here is one:
ICRP said, the tritium emission (from atomic power plants) in water should be 40.000 Bq.

In 1990 they said: Lets make 7000 Bq/ litre.

This was proved by ACES (Comitee for environmental standards, Canada). They said: change the 7000 Bq (Because of cancer danger).

They also said: Lower it to 100 Bq in five years until you get 20 Bq / Litre.

Life-Upgrade.com

Read Full Post »

The IAEA, WHO and TEPCO should be a case for the International Criminal Courts

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

News from April 13th 2011: Fukushima is now INES 7 – like Chernobyl. The IAEA doesn’t want that. Read here why.

The IAEA organizes propaganda conferences each year. Only those who are recommended by their country’s atomic authority are permitted to participate. Nuclear issues which are subject to criticism are excluded.
The World Health Organization (WHO) also organizes annual conferences. However, WHO is gagged by the IAEA (per Agreement WHA 12-40 of 1959) and is prohibited from independently issuing statements regarding the health effects of atomic accidents.
This means the IAEA’s engineers and physicists are given the legal right to make statements about the health impacts of atomic accidents at the same time medical doctors from the World Health Organization are legally prohibited from doing so. The IAEA’s physicists issue official statements about the biological effects of exposure to radiation or radioactive contamination; they are permitted to assess the impact of accidental exposure or releases of radioactive contamination on human health.

The IAEA has a history of denying that the following health impacts occurred as a result of exposure to radiation and radioactive contaminants: damage to the immune system, stillbirths, thyroid cancer in children, brain damage, mental retardation, trisomy 21, diabetes, fetal abnormalities, disabled children, and all kinds of cancer, illness.
Many of these illnesses occur months, years or decades after initial or continued exposure and therefore, the IAEA and WHO artificially reduce the casualty count by including only those injuries received in the first minutes, hours, days following a nuclear accident.

The proposal to bring TEPCO before the International Criminal Court (ICC) was made by German politician, Stefan Wenzel on April 9th, 2011, during the IPPNW congress in Berlin. Watch his impressive speech here (beginning at 4:08 Min.):

He also brought the following proposal to dissolve the secret relationship between the IAEA and WHO before the “Bundestag”, a federal legislative body in Germany.

http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/05/19/german-greens-cancel-secret-gag-agreement-between-iaea-and-w-h-o/

The UN General Assembly adopted the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court on July 17, 1998. On July 1, 2002 the statute came into force. “The International Criminal Court is a permanent tribunal to prosecute individuals for genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes.” (Wikipedia, 03/25/2011) Thus far, the ICC has not accepted criminal or civil cases involving the destruction of natural resources and environmental terrorism. The establishment of its authority to do so is long overdue.
In relation to the ongoing accident at Fukushima, responsible officials from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the World Health Organization (WHO), the operating company (TEPCO) and Japanese nuclear power regulators should be brought before the International Criminal Court and held accountable for their actions.
Failure to aid in tens of thousands of cases and threats to natural resources hundreds of thousands if not millions of people is a Felony.
The behavior of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the World Health Organization (WHO) following the reactor accident of Fukushima is a scandal. WHO has made public statements trivializing the emergency and ceding all of its responsibilities to the IAEA, citing the treaty of 1957. “What is WHO’s role in nuclear emergencies? Answer by WHO: “Within the United Nations system, the IAEA is the lead agency for coordination of international response to radiation events.” (World Health Organization, Japan Nuclear Concerns, FAQ, 14 March 2011, Geneva)
The IAEA – an organization whose Board of Governors is dominated by and comprised almost entirely of nuclear industry members, holds fast to its opinion that Fukushima should be assessed at Level 5 on the International Rating scale for significant events in nuclear facilities (INES).
The quantity of radioactive Iodine-131 released is a central indicator for the evaluation of nuclear accidents on the INES scale. The release of more than “a few 10 ^ 16 Bq of iodine 131” is classified as a level 7 catastrophic accident this (INES) scale.
Apparently, the IAEA, TEPCO and the Japanese government officials in charge have not clearly stated how much radioactive material has been released throughout the unfolding of the Fukushima disaster. According to estimates by the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO), comprised of 60 monitoring stations world-wide under the auspices of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, the first three days of the Fukushima accident alone released about 3.8 x 10 ^ 17 Bq of radioactive Iodine-131. That is about 100 times the official inventory. The Fukushima disaster has also released significant amounts of several other radionuclides which have not even been measured.
Due to these figures, the Fukushima accident would have been legitimately classified as INES level 7 a long time ago. Greenpeace is now in the process of conducting its own analysis.
The behavior of WHO and the IAEA is therefore an unprecedented scandal. An inappropriately small evacuation zone is estimated to have resulted in the needless exposure of pregnant women, children, and other adults to excessive levels of radiation and radioactive contamination beyond 250mSv, the limit set for the recognition of work related cancer among Japanese nuclear power plant employees. Radiation biology assumes that if 10,000 people were exposed to a dose of 1 Sv, then 500 deaths are expected to occur as a result of their exposure (ICRP60) 500-1200 (BEIRV) 580-1740 (RERF), 2400 (Köhler). The ICRP – another profiteer of the atomic industry – made the recommendations for radiation protection standards, which were accepted by all countries and which were used o justify IAEA regulations. Interesting isn’t it?

Here is one:
ICRP set the original safety standard for tritium emission (from atomic power plants) in water at 40,000 Bq/litre.
In 1990 the ICRP said: Let’s lower the safety standard for tritium to 7000 Bq/ litre.
The new 7000 Bq/litre limit was approved by ACES (Committee for Environmental Standards, Canada). They agreed to change the safety limit to 7000 Bq/litre because of the cancer risk.
The ICRP later said: Let’s lower the safety standard to 100 Bq/litre every five years until we get down to 20 Bq /litre.
I think there is a big difference between ‘safety’ limits of 40,000 Bq/litre and 20 Bq/litre!
Said another way, if 40,000Bq/litre was safe, why would they ever lower the limit to 20 Bq/litre?

(thanks to Tadema for help)

 

Fukushima and Three Mile Island USA: strategic misinterpretation by the IAEA

Japanese officals and WHO ignore irradiated Japanese Children

IAEA and ICRP – Licence to Kill – ALARA principle

Fukushima: The IAEA strategy

Japan: Additional 252,500 Cancer Cases and Risk for pregnant women

25 Years with FUKUSHIMA

Atomic Industry – Licence to Kill

Life-Upgrade.com

Read Full Post »