Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘radionuclides’

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

Source: Pro Nuclear ICRP International Commission on Radiation Protection – linked to IAEA and Industry. Founded 1928. One year after Nobel Prize Winner Muller proved the transmutation of the gene by radiation.

SCANS:

ICRP-Scan02 ICRP-Scan01

1927 Herman J Mueller discovered in 1927 (!) the following: ARTIFICIAL TRANSMUTATION OF THE GENE by radiation – he got the The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1946:

http://www.esp.org/foundations/genetics/classical/holdings/m/hjm-1927a.pdf

It was repeated by Fukushima`s butterflies, in 2011: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/08/17/fukushimas-butterflies-known-since-1927/

1928 the ICRP was founded. No coincidence: http://www.icrp.org/publication.asp?id=1928%20Recommendations

cosmosTEPCO

ICRP has confirmed in 1966 that natural radiation is harmful! ICRP Publication Number 8 from 1966 on page 60. in relation to the health damage caused by natural radiation for the bulk of the world’s population is a risk of sixth order (1 to 10 dead per million per rad / gray) in a few areas with high natural background radiation the risk fifth order. 10 to 100 dead per million and rad (gray). and in 1977 the ICRP publication number 26 said, that, in this sense, regional differences of the natural radiation are so regarded, that the corresponding differences include the damage. and in the ’80s the natural radiation was simply doubled. and in 2011 it became the twentyfold in japan: 20 mSv/a. Natural radiation is used as an excuse to increase artificial radiation with radionuclides from reactors.

They call that radiation-protection!

nuclear-food

Internal Dose for japanese Infants: 1 SIEVERT per year: http://www.strahlentelex.de/RadiationRisk_EU_042011_engl.pdf

“According to the ICRP in 1991, just 5 mSv to the testes could cause damage to offspring – yet this dose was permitted yearly to members of the public, and ten times more was permitted to nuclear workers, in all countries prior to 1990. It continues today to be permitted yearly for nuclear workers in most countries.” http://iicph.org/victims_of_the_nuclear_age

1971: the discoverer of plutonium and president of the USAEC Glenn Theodore Seaborg resigns – at the same time the ICRP reduced the additional maximum dose near reactors for the public from 500 mrem/annual (5 mSv/a) to 5 mrem/annual (0,05 mSv/a).

the USAEC “protects” health and advertises nuclear industry at the same time, later renamed in AEC, then renamed in NRC.

Source NRC (USAEC / AEC before): http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/32111590/seaborg-resigns-from-aec

Source (ICRP 5 mSv/a): http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2596042/pdf/yjbm00117-0064.pdf

! no coincidence !

Dose-Limit

Thanks to Prof. Ernest Sternglass and his studies about infant mortality near reactors;: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/inetSeries/ejs1192.html

And, in 1991, the ICRP lowered the standard from 5 mSv /a to 1 mSv/a: “For occupational exposure in planned exposure situations the Commission now recommends an equivalent dose limit for the lens of the eye of 20 mSv in a year, averaged over defined periods of 5 years, with no single year exceeding 50 mSv.” page 1:  Source: http://www.icrp.org/docs/ICRP%20Statement%20on%20Tissue%20Reactions.pdf

And in 2011, the japanese government increased it for infants, students, mature, unborn, to: 20 mSv/a

A 2000 PERCENT INCREASE.

Source: http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/breaking-news/japanese-ire-over-radiation-limit-for-kids/story-e6frf7jx-1226061484710

20 mSv mean: below, but still high: 555,000 becquerel per m² contamination (from 1995 Belarus National Report):

17 milli Sievert per year mean: 16,000 – 32,000 additional cancer deaths AND 150,000 – 1,5 million deaths by genetic diseases: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/PP/app1.html by John W. Gofman, Ph.D., M.D and Arthur R. Tamplin, Ph.D. quote “If we use the most optimistic Russell mouse genetic data, and even if we give full credit for slow delivery of radiation, we reach the conclusion that 100,000 extra genetic deaths per year would occur for the allowable average exposure of 170 millirads to the population. This can hardly be construed as an “optimistic” outlook, or a “safe” dose of radiation.”

http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/03/19/effect-of-cesium-and-strontium-on-japanese-children-japanese-officals-irresponsible/

NUCLEAR HOLOCAUST in SLOW MOTION.

“…To provide an adequate safety standard the dose limit of 1 mSv/y have to be reduced to 0.02 mSv/y or 20 µSv/y.”Page 9: http://www.staff.uni-marburg.de/~kunih/all-doc/stoakuni.pdf by Dr. Horst Kuni, Nuclear Medicine, University Professor.

food

Professor Yuri Bandazhevsky, a pathologist, Rector of the Medical Institute of Gomel, on the ingestion of radio caesium includes – he said: “Clinical checks on children between 1996 and 1999 show that at levels greater than 50Bq/kg there are pathological changes in vital organs and systems – cardiovascular, nervous, endocrine, immune, reproductive, digestive excretory and eyes. Caesium concentrations in the placenta reveal a relationship with nervous system defects in the foetus. The health condition of the population is a disaster but being a physician myself I cannot accept it as hopeless. With all my faith in God and life I appeal to anyone who can influence it: do your best to improve the situation. There is nothing more precious on this planet than life. And we should do everything possible to protect it.” http://www.spokesmanbooks.com/Spokesman/PDF/91Gifford.pdf

Until 1990 ICRP said it is not necessary to evacuate people, as long as the radiation does not exceed 500 mSv.: http://books.google.de/books?id=Ber3ENERfGwC&pg=PA343&lpg=PA343&dq=ICRP+40++500mSv&source=bl&ots=IaOqT2MqK2&sig=l3l0MYGe_nKkaXxvFZxkkG8hP5M&hl=de&ei=gc81TpqyI4PfsgajxLG5Ag&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=8&ved=0CE0Q6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=ot%20exceed%20500%20mSv.%20The%20ICRP&f=false

IAEA subsequently took its radiation protection recommendations directly from ICRP (rather than WHO), therefore persons from the Commission who also sit on UNSCEAR both make the rules and judge their adequacy: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/Chernobyl/CaUFtH.html

Clause 12 of the Executive conclusion of the Recommendation of the European Committee for radiation risks declares: “…Total maximal permitted dose from all human-caused sources should not exceed 0.1 mSv for population and 5 mSv for personnel”. This publication is declared by the European Committee for radiation risks as “regulating”. It is only common sense that we should follow the recommendations given in this publication by the scientists from Canada, Norway, Great Britain, Denmark, Switzerland, the USA, Ireland, Sweden, Germany, France, India, Belarus, Finland and Russia. page 16 http://independentwho.org/media/Documents_IW/Forum_Radioprotection_English_Abstracts_IW_2012.pdf

“European Parliament hears criticisms of radiation protection standards, but don’t publish findings” Brussels 1998: page 35 for example: Childhood leukemia caused by normal reactor operation: http://www.llrc.org/health/subtopic/stoaabstracts.pdf

 

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

use it, copy it, share it.

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

0fbada3476459c52785ec0a2027a01f6

Citizens’ Movement Fukushima-EVENT took place on Oct 15th 2013: http://www.mfj.gr.jp/agenda/2013/10/15/index_ja.php
Scientific and Medical Views on Health Effects of Exposure to Radiation

CONTENT: http://csrp.blog.fc2.com/?lang=en

PDF: http://www.mfj.gr.jp/agenda/_data/2013-10-15-16_Fukushima.pdf

LOCATION: http://www.mfj.gr.jp/index.php

FORMER LIVESTREAM: http://janic-fukushima.jp/static_html/csrp.html

Participants: CRIIRAD from France: http://www.criirad.org/english/presentation.html

CRMS: http://en.crms-jpn.org/

Pre-Event from 2012

The latest food measurements from Fukushima CRMS (citizens’ Movement) http://crms-fukushima.blogspot.jp/

They are the only reliable source in Japan, among other CIVIL SOCIETY NGOs and simple measurements done by cititzens.

infirmity

DO NOT TRUST OFFICIALS.

What we really need is a genome analysis of all peoples. A ban for growing food near reactors (compensators for farmers from operators) and ultimately above the equator in nuclear states. A complete infinite energy for everyone: solar energy. The end of power and domination. The repeal of the linear dose response methodology. A ban on dose limits for food and water. A reliable express measurement method of all foods. For everyone, and for free. The reverence for life as the basis of all sciences. A nuclear priesthood, composed of citizens. Immediate withdrawal from nuclear energy. Stopping of Shipment of nuclear waste, all around the world. Keeping it in the country that made it.

Absurd: In part, it is this: The newer the studies and scientific evidence emerges, the more they move away from the truth and earlier provided evidence – and will lead to a distortion of reality, to a mere template into which the “experts” cram the reality. The observation has long given way to the design.

Are YOU aware, that there is NO LIMIT for radionuclides in soil?
This is the worldwide standard. Where EVERYTHING grows.
The same goes for sea.
How to decontaminate reality? First we must get rid of “dose limits” / accepting nuclear fission products

The trend of abortion because of disability or deformity increases.
Consequently, these children drop out of the statistics.
The result is, that there are fewer children born.
PLUS fewer children are born at the same time, because parents are sterile.

Tritium in Water.
Radioactive hydrogen.
In the water.
The biggest disaster!
The entire ecosystem of the world is killed from the bottom up!
Radioactive plankton can take up the 200,000th a radioactive substance.

The experts talk about radiation.

Where it is, how much is irradiated…

What is radiation?

Atoms.

Atoms are everywhere.

There are no clear boundaries, there are no limits at all.

Imagination is required, not arrogant expertise.

We can use Olympics to draw attention on Fukushima
The Civil Society in Japan can.

The main product of the nuclear industry is murder
and a little bit of electricity.

 

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

decay-game

Plutonium (Pu-239), that triggers in micrograms cancer, is produced in each reactor in the fission of uranium, about 250kg per year and reactor.
Radiogases which reactors emit do not disappear.
Instead they become more deadly.
Krypton 89 stays 18,4 seconds (full decay time) and becomes Strontium 89, which stays 500 days.
Krypton 90 stays 323 seconds and delievers Strontium 90 (288 years) via Rubidium 90 (1,580 seconds).
Xenon 137 stays 384 minutes and decays into Cesium 137 (300 years) which becomes stable Barium 137.
Plutonium 241 stays 147 years, becomes Americium 241 which stays 4,000 years and then becomes Neptunium 237, which stays 22 million years.

HALF-LIFE – an euphemistic term, used by the nuclear industry, to downplay and conceal.

European Continent is COMPLETELY irradiated: http://www.unscear.org/docs/JfigXI.pdf Cesium 137: Full Decay Time is 10 human generatons = 300 years.

Radionuclides decay more slowly with time.

Half life time means that only half of the radiation has disappeared. You have to multiply the half life time by ten in order to know approximately, when it disappeared from the environment. In the case of Strontium and Cesium that would be 300 years. http://www.n-tv.de/Spezial/Horrorszenario-wartet-auf-Japan-article2887296.html

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

cheap-death

WHY IS NUCLEAR ENERGY CALLED “CHEAP”?

Because our life is not worth anything!

If you wage war, it’s about the attitude, the thinking away. In order to destroy the enemy, you take into account collataral damage  (Murder of civilians).So this kind of thinking and acting is possible. Exactly this behavior is used on the OWN population. Secret service murder in their own country, to blame others  (e.g. Moscow apartment buildings were blown up by the KGB). Atomic Power kills and wounds over 1,3 billion people since it’s creation.For certain forces on this planet the war against the external enemies and their own people is alike. This substantial equivalence and the mechanization of our lives makes the unthinkable possible. So the obvious (reverence for life) becomes impossible. Even the victims speak their own death sentence while they find protection from the truth as a sedative.

Councilor of radiation is led by a pharmaceutical company and ICRP http://fukushima-diary.com/2012/02/councilor-of-radiation-is-led-by-a-pharmaceutical-company-and-icrp/

nuclear-food KofiAnnan childrenkill-IAEA WHOIAEA01

There is the power to physically and psychologically harming someone.

And there is the nuclear energy, which does both.

In fact in the CORE of life, the Atom. To make the innermost the enemy.

There is no more powerful force.

It doesn’t make sense from a rational, life affirming point of view. So does Collateral Damage. Cancer Cures probably do exist. Before the disease, cure is already invented. A common strategy in science. Nano particles are eaten as sugar by cancer cells and are heated up / detonated from the outside. Such cures are in the making. We are not the ones to profit from it, you can be sure.

this is the ICRP (pro nuclear commission) risk assessment (http://www.icrp.org/publication.asp?id=ICRP+Publication+22) on page 14/15 they say The commission discussed the application of risk assessments to estimate the actual cases of disease that can result from a given radiation exposure of individuals or populations (…) One way to improve the usefulness of risk estimates, is to express them as damage measurement in monetary terms… Several authors have already performed such calculations and indicate the cost per person, and “rem” (1 rem = 10 mSv) to 10 to 250 US dollars. (ICRP publication 22 1973)

BEIR 1972 page 69 / 70: Created by the National Academy of Sciences: suffering is “converted” in dollars. In the 1970ies the annual health care costs per capita in the U.S. estimated at $ 400 lump sum for medical expenses, based on $ 80 billion for medical expenses in 1970 (200 million citizens). Mr. Lederberg (BEIR) said that when allowed 1.7 mSv per year (mSv for nuclear workers 50 / a) is increased in 30 years, the total level of disease in the U.S.increases by 0.5 to 5%. 10 mSv increase 0.1 to 1%. In 30 years (one generation) causes $ 12,000 per head (30 x $ 400). 10 mSv per generation would result in 10-120 dollars costs (0.1 to 1% of 12,000 dollars).

How much does a cancer drug? 10.000, $ 20.000? Genetic defects are not considered.

BEIR 1972 still assumed it will come to more than 6.2 deaths per 100 people when irradiated with 1 sievert, the same panel twenty years later, already figured at 12.4 cancer deaths. ICRP has confirmed in 1966 that natural radiation is harmful! ICRP Publication Number 8 from 1966 on page 60. in relation to the health damage caused by natural radiation for the bulk of the world’s population is a risk of sixth order (1 to 10 dead per million per rad / gray) in a few areas with high natural background radiation the risk fifth order. 10 to 100 dead per million and rad (gray). and in 1977 the ICRP publication number 26 said, that, in this sense, regional differences of the natural radiation are so regarded, that the corresponding differences include the damage. and in the ’80s the natural radiation was simply doubled. and in 2011 it became the twentyfold in japan: 20 mSv/a. Natural radiation is used as an excuse to increase artificial radiation with radionuclide-antagonists. http://www.ratical.org/radiation/inetSeries/ejs1192.html

They call that radiation-protection!

1) Councilor of radiation is led by a pharmaceutical company and ICRP | Fukushima Diary

2) Nano Cancer Alliance

3) World Health Organisation: Fukushima data still under lock and key

The experts talk about radiation.

Where it is, how much is irradiated…

What is radiation?

Atoms.

Atoms are everywhere.

There are no clear boundaries, there are no limits at all.

Imagination is required, not arrogant expertise.

This war takes everywhere, but invisible, in the inner of Matter.

UN-cancer Industrial-Destruction_of-L NuclearBanks

food-fetus-radiation

Radiation-Science

internal-emitters0251

Stochastic effects and children:
There is statistical health damage caused by the so-called low-level radiation (above ZERO up to 500mSv.) That is not assigned to any particular people, but occur in a defined population. This issue is the subject of thousands of studies all over the world since the Chernobyl nuclear disaster, and I will discuss in detail below with reference to examples. Factors such as age, gender, health, immune system, nutrition, social situation and the duration of exposure of the radioactivity influence the onset of cancer and other diseases. Until the Chernobyl disaster, the biological effects in the body of the
radioactive isotopes have been undervalued.

It is now clear: Any radiation poses a risk especially for children who are extremely radiosensitive.

1) A child is constantly increasing in weight and size, it grows from the intrauterine embryo to adult, the younger, the faster. Therefore, the cells divide much more frequently than an adult. Cells in the division phase (mitosis) are more vulnerable to radiation than cells in the resting phase.

2) The ability of the body to recognize “defective” cells and to  eliminate them develops during childhood. An embryo has not yet this ability. Therefore  “defective” cells can multiply unimpeded and later lead to cancer or heritable diseases.

3) A child that grows must hold more substances than emiting them, more than an adult. The body of a child takes in more radioactive substances in food, drink and air we breathe than adults. Especially dangerous are 137 and Cs-134 and 137 and Sr-90 – deposited in the muscles or in the bone (see below).

4) Children have their whole lives ahead of them. Some diseases caused by radiation take a long time to occur (latency): 20 or even 30 years. Children are more likely than older adults to reach the dubious chance to see the end of this latency. In the human body there are about 200 different cell types, each has a different function.

Basically, each cell can respond to injury with four responses:

1) The damage is so severe that the cell dies.

2) The cell can repair the damage (in children see above).

3) The cell loses its ability to produce certain substances, such as in the pancreas gland which can not produce insulin anymore (increase of diabetes in Belarus among children and adults) or other digestive juices during the growth, of the thyroid hormones.

4) The malignant cells degenerate and there is cancer.

It is now clear: Any radiation poses a risk especially for children who are extremely radiosensitive.

The effect of 4 isotopes of iodine -131, Strontium-90, Tritium (H-3) and cesium – 134 / 137 on the human body I will now show more detail, not without pointing out the most toxic isotope, plutonium (Pu-239), that triggers in micrograms cancer. It is produced in each reactor in the fission of uranium, about 250kg per year and reactor.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 79 other followers