Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘nuclear’

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

Industrial-Destruction_of-L

Millions Fewer Girls Born: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2011/06/110602-millions-fewer-girls-nuclear-radiation-births-science/

“In December 2011, 9 months after Fukushima, there is also a significant deficit in the number of live births in Japan. A similar decline in birth numbers was found in February 1987 in southern Bavaria, the German region most affected by Chernobyl fallout. In Japan as well as Bavaria, the effect is limited to a single month.” http://www.strahlentelex.de/Infant_mortality_in_Japan_after_Fukushima.pdf

“Up to 1,300 million people have been killed, maimed or diseased by nuclear power since its inception. The industry’s figures massively underestimate the real cost of nuclear power, in an attempt to hide
its victims from the world.” http://exacteditions.theecologist.org/read/ecologist/vol-29-no-7-november-1999-5368/29/2/

“The most important consideration is the generally accepted value judgment that early embryonic losses are of little personal or social concern.” Dr R. Mole, 1979, a member of ICRP – The international committee which makes the dose limits WORLDWIDE ignores LIFE. http://bjr.birjournals.org/content/52/614/89

Perinatal mortality in Germany following the Chernobyl accident: http://www.alfred-koerblein.de/chernobyl/downloads/KoKu1997.pdf and: 福島原発事故後の日本における乳児死亡率 Infant mortality in Japan

MORE: http://www.alfred-koerblein.de/indexengl.htm

“Possible scale of lost or impaired children after Chernobyl in all of Europe and the part of Asia covered – Missing Children: 2,5 Million.” PAGE 34 http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/RIGEinEuroandCNPPc.pd

http://www.atomkongress.de/z_folien_busby.pdf – quote: “Nuclear site child leukemia and cancer clusters (Sellafield, Dounreay, La Hague, Aldermaston discovered in the period 1983-1996. Causality denied by
ICRP, COMARE, UNSCEAR, BEIR, WHO, EU and Nuclear Industry.” and: “New research shows that if a cell is hit, its progeny are likely to suffer from an increased tendency to general mutation. This is called genomic instability.”  PAGE 2 + 3

Congenital Malformation and Stillbirth in Germany and Europe Before and
European stillbirth proportions before

“After Chernobyl, infant mortality rates in Sweden, Finland and Norway increased by a significant 15.8 percent compared to the trend for the period 1976 to 2006. Alfred Körblein calculated that for the period 1987 to 1992 an additional 1,209 (95% confidence interval: 875 to 1,556) infants had died.”

“From the period of atmospheric nuclear weapons testing it is known that the infant mortality parameter is sensitive to radioactivity. It therefore comes as no surprise that there are now numerous studies showing that infant mortality is not only higher in the vicinity of Chernobyl, but also further away – in Europe. In the textbooks there is nothing to be found on this yet, but it is to be found in a number of different journals.”

“In 1986 in Berlin, an unusual increase of infant mortality was observed. Compared to 1985, infant mortality in Berlin rose in 1986 from 10.6 to12.5 per 1,000 live births in the first year of life. The mortality rate of non-German infants increased over-proportionally from 9.6 auf 14.3 per thousand. The mortality rate even increased between the end of the first week and the end of the first year of life by 26 percent. There had previously been a decrease in infant mortality”

“Ever since discovering the mutagenicity of ionising radiation in animal experiments, damaging radiation genetic effects in humans have also been repeatedly considered and examined. The ICRP, however, is of the opinion that teratogenic damage (stillbirths, infant mortality, severe malformation) does not occur below a dose of 100 mSV. Since the mean dose for Germany in 1986-7 was only 0.2 mSV, according to ICRP opinion there can’t have been an increase in teratogenic damage. On the other hand, there are numerous studies from Germany, Europe and the three countries in the Chernobyl region that show that there was indeed an increase in teratogenic damage, contrary to expectations on the part of these scientists.”

Source: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/Chernobyl/HEofC25yrsAC.html

PEACEFUL MURDER

PEACEFUL MURDER

Kofi Annan about Chernobyl: “the exact number of victims may never be known, but that 3 million children require treatment and “many will die prematurely.” http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=20000426&slug=4017441

In the late 70s, there were in Wisconsin / USA seven nuclear power plants without incident. The mortality of infants of lower weight (less than 2500 grams) was examined: If the officially published emission rates of the nuclear power plants increased from year to year (Source: Government of the United States), also the mortality of underweight babies was increased. http://books.google.de/books?id=Rdgo5cXrO94C&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q=Small%20babies%20die%20near%20nuclear%20plants&f=false

“According to the ICRP in 1991, just 5 mSv to the testes could cause damage to offspring – yet this dose was permitted yearly to members of the public, and ten times more was permitted to nuclear workers, in all countries prior to 1990. It continues today to be permitted yearly for nuclear workers in most countries.” http://iicph.org/victims_of_the_nuclear_age

Perinatal mortality rates in the regions of Ukraine and Belarus surrounding the Chernobyl site increased in 1987, the year following the Chernobyl accident. The same year, increases of perinatal mortality were also observed in Germany and Poland, and the effect can be associated with the caesium burden in pregnant women. After 1989, there is an unexpected second rise of perinatal mortality in Belarus and Ukraine. This increase is shown to correlate with the strontium content in pregnant women. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12754809

the human sex ratio at birth in several European countries before and after the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant accident was investigated. A long-term chronic impact of radioactive fallout on the secondary sex ratio has been found http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/env.958/abstract;jsessionid=69E27384F9B8CCE48A54AADC6FDA0606.d02t03

Mother Instinct = Disruptive Factor: http://www.ars.usda.gov/is/ar/archive/nov95/broodiness1195.htm?pf=1 genetically turned off. Prolactin for mother instinct comes from the pituitary gland.

yttrium 90, the daughter product of strontium — were known to concentrate in the pituitary gland.” “even slight damage to the pituitary gland from radioactivity in the air or in the mother’s diet could lead to a slight retardation in development” http://www.ratical.org/radiation/SecretFallout/SFchp14.html

KofiAnnan

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

100mSv100mph

A Statement of the German Society for Radiation Protection against Current Attempts of the Nuclear Lobby to Deny Low-Dose Radiation Effects: http://www.strahlentelex.de/The_100_Millisievert_Threshold_Lie_Statement_German_GSS.pdf
“To insist on a “practical” threshold dose of 100 mSv in these days simply ignores the current state of knowledge. It is irresponsible and criminal with respect to the victims

of environmental radioactive contaminations and other low dose exposures.”
“…To provide an adequate safety standard the dose limit of 1 mSv/y have to be reduced to 0.02 mSv/y or 20 µSv/y.”Page 9:  http://www.staff.uni-marburg.de/~kunih/all-doc/stoakuni.pdf by Dr. Horst Kuni, Nuclear Medicine, University Professor.

Scientific Downplaying and euphemism:

a) Our estimates suggest that a cumulative exposure of 100 mSv would lead to a 9.7% (1.4 to 19.7%) increased mortality from all cancers excluding leukaemia and a 5.9% (−2.9 to 17.0%) increased mortality from all cancers excluding leukaemia, lung, and pleura compared with background rates: http://www.bmj.com/content/331/7508/77.full?sid=ed1379eb-6c19-40da-ba21-8c9b05d9b9da

b) http://blogs.flinders.edu.au/flinders-news/2011/07/14/radiation-response-a-meltdown-in-reason/ – This is anti human science.

In contrast: Page 2: “Table 1 Incidence of 12 classes of disease among liquidators per 100 thousand people” – shows massive increase of diseases. Page 6 “relation between effects at low-intensive dosage and dose rate” and Page 11 “the PRESENCE of linear or linear-quadratic dependency IS NOT obligatory for the cases of diseases and deaths from malignant neoplasm at low doses”: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Burlakova.pdf

HORMESIS:

“Recently, in a concerted effort to raise the permissible levels of radiation for workers and the public, members of the Heath Physics Society have been actively promoting their theory of Hormesis, namely, that low dose exposures to radiation induce “beneficial” effects such as longevity, robustness, radio-resistance and increased growth. The use of the term “beneficial” implies a judgment, not a scientific fact. Experiments backing these hypotheses have been difficult to reproduce and definitions of “beneficial” have been controversial and appear very subjective. Claims of low dose hormesis have frequently been based on high dose observations, and the only mechanisms offered for these effects has been speculation on repair overshoot at the cellular and genome level. Cell growth as “hormetic” is the most troubling claim, since illicit growth stimulation signifies catastrophe for biological organisms.” http://www.ccnr.org/radiation_standards.html

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

rockets-reactors

1981: Osirak Nuclear Reactor IRAQ

2007: Ali Kibar Nuclear Reactor SYRIA

20??: NO WAR ON IRAN

Israel und US plan attack: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-15595657

President Obama declared his plan for withdrawal of US forces from Afghanistan. And later, also from Iraq.

http://edition.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/06/23/afghanistan.troops.drawdown/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

Because a US led atomic attack against Iran will cause fallout, which will also affect Afghanistan and Iraq.

Projected Casualties Among U.S. Military Personnel and Civilian Populations from the Use of Nuclear Weapons Against Hard and Deeply Buried Targets:

http://www.ippnw-students.org/iran/RNEP_Report_Final.pdf

The IPPNW (peace nobel prize 1985) says, that

  • six B61-11 earth-penetrating atomic weapons with a yield of 340 kt each will be dropped according to HPAC / Pentagon scenario
  • dropped on: Isfahan and Natnaz (Iran)
  • Result: In 48 hours -> 2,6 million deaths, fallout on India, Pakistan, Afghanistan (evacuation of the troops?), 10,5 million people injured.

iran-afghanistan

At the same time Iran is trying to run it’s atomic reactors (build by russian company ROSATOM – builds now in Belarus, most Chernobyl affected country) – which are offline since the outbreak of the computervirus Stuxnet:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/16/world/middleeast/16stuxnet.html

If the atomic reactors are running and producing Plutonium, Iran fulfills these conditions:

  • 1st, the 2002 Nuclear Posture Review
  • 2nd, the National Security Strategies of 2002
  • 3rd, the 2006 National Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction

These 3 papers will be used as a reason to start a war.

Plus: The atomic facilities of Iran are underground. Which makes them invulnerable against conventional attacks.

1981 – Israelian conventional airstrike against ABOVEGROUND Iraq atomic reactor Osirak: http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/june/7/newsid_3014000/3014623.stm

2007 – Israelian conventional airstrike against ABOVEGROUND Syrian atomic reactor: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/14/washington/14weapons.html

So, the HPAC program used by the US Pentagon recommends the use of six B-61 atomic weapons against Iran – each digging 7 meters deep and then exploding.

B 61 atomic bomb: http://books.google.de/books?id=YgAAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA78&lpg=PA78&dq=pentagon+less+fallout+b-61&source=bl&ots=kYo5w2KxVZ&sig=M2UcN_1fIzSsdPkB-y2Nx8wEIGQ&hl=de&ei=csAxTr2XMYbesgaamYjpBg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CCAQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false

A civil atomic program – supported by the IAEA – is the base for a military atomic program. If this military atomic program violates the proliferation: A war is inevitable. So, the IAEA plays a key role in Preparing Wars.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9409

Ignored by World Media, played by 5 VETO members of Security Council.

Jan Hemmer

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

IAEA-CTBTO

Written by CTBTO one day ago, in a short teply to me:

!!!!

“The Japanese think tank CPDNP regularely publishes data from the Takasaki station http://www.cpdnp.jp/pdf/130110Takasaki_report_Dec31.pdf (LINK)

!!!!

Why is this important?

Answer: The World Health Organisation WHO has to date the results of measurement to Fukushima under wraps, the WHO and the IAEA regularly receives from the international authority to monitor agreements on nuclear weapons test ban (CTBTO). The world’s 60 monitoring stations of the CTBTO to register around the clock, the radioactivity in the atmosphere. General Secretary Chan of the WHO said the WHO would publish CTBTO measurement data  “only if it’s dangerous values.” If that was the case, they decide “alone”. At the same time, there is NO safe level of radiation. K.Z. Morgan (former ICRP chairman) “there is no dose of radiatoon so low that the risk of malignancy is zero” QUOTE page 30, right, although the ICRP claimed the opposite until 1960. http://books.google.de/books?id=aAoAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA30#v=onepage&q&f=false

LOW DOSES ARE THE MAIN KILL! How the Nuclear Industry first kills the Children and then the Parents

click: Low Radiation: The Petkau Effect

click: Radiation: Larger effect of small doses!

Of only ONE Station: CTBTO station Takasaki is 200 km from Fukushima.

Why is this outstanding? ANSWER: IAEA conceales CTBTO Fukushima Data (LINK)

“Two stations of the CTBTO network, Okinawa and Takasaki, are located in Japan, but 133Xe (XENON) measurements are made only at Takasaki. However, the Takasaki noble gas detections were, for an extended period of time, reaching the dynamic range of the system, meaning that measurements were so high that they became unreliable. Regarding the 137Cs (CESIUM) measurements at Takasaki, there was another problem: During the first passage of the plume at this station, radioactivity entered the interior of the building. This resulted in a serious contamination, meaning that 137Cs shows up continuously in the measurements since the initial event, even when it is completely absent in the ambient air.”

THIS IS THE NETWORK: http://www.ctbto.org/map/#ims

USUALLY IAEA AND WHO CONCEAL ALL CTBTO DATA!

Kennedy stopped the bomb tests because of Strontium in milk. Shortly after he was shot!

請願 http://www.cpdnp.jp/pdf/120521Takasaki_report_May11.pdf

German http://www.bfs.de/de/ion/imis/spurenmessungen.html

Philippine http://www.pnri.dost.gov.ph/index.php

Austrian http://www.zamg.ac.at/wetter/fukushima/

I hereby demand that the results of the analyses conducted to measure the airborne radioactivity by the global network (TICEN) be made public, ENTIRELY AND WITHOUT ANY FURTHER DELAY:

english: http://petitions.criirad.org/?For-a-total-transparency-on-the

請願: http://petitions.criirad.org/?%E8%AB%8B%E9%A1%98%E6%9B%B8,34

française http://petitions.criirad.org/?-Petitions-

thanks CRIIRAD!

Millions Fewer Girls Born: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2011/06/110602-millions-fewer-girls-nuclear-radiation-births-science/

Jan Hemmer

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

KofiAnnan

This data is concealed and ignored and out of print, and is applicable both to Fukushima, as well as on normal reactor emissions:

This is how Chernobyl looks today in Children: Children Radiation Maps

This is what Atoms for Peace really are: Atoms for Peaceful Murder

The summary of the most important russian, belarusian and ukrainian studies, ignored by western world: http://www.strahlentelex.de/Yablokov%20Chernobyl%20book.pdf

This shows, how Chernobyl kills, mostly with slow and low doses, increasing in time an space: Direct Damage To People attributable to Chernobyl

And the damage increases from Generation to Generation: Chernobyl: Evidence of Genetic or Teratogenic Damage to Environment and Humans

Why is there no Compenstion for no one? Chernobyl and the Human Rights of the Victims (ALARA, ICRP, IAEA)

A nuclear explosion of the reactor type is possible, it is the other form of the known bomb type explosion: Chernobyl: The Accident and it’s implications for other Nuclear Reactors

A summary of Three Mile Island, Chernobyl and how IAEA undermines health, freedom and justice: Dr. Bertell on TMI, radiation, Chernobyl, IAEA

“Possible scale of lost or impaired children after Chernobyl in all of Europe and the part of Asia coveredMissing Children: 2,5 Million.” PAGE 34 of new link: http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/RIGEinEuroandCNPPc.pdf

Chernobyl is empty. New sarcophagus is USELESS. Supervisor of new sarcophagus is “Hans Blix” IAEA former Director. He said in 1986: “A yearly Chernobyl is acceptable for the world…” The new sarcophagus is financed by the European Nuclear Banks! What you see here in this video is NOT the fuel melting, because it was thrown completely out and it is NOT graphite fire, there was none. It is the 2,000 tons reactor lid, that was thrown aside and is GLOWING because of HEAT, it was so hot, that it turned from Red (770 – 800°C) into Yellow (1150 – 1250°C): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bhqb1HfHDwg Helicopter crew did not survive. This 2,000 tons lid was thrown aside by 1,2 Terrajoule of energy = 0,2 – 0,3 KT TNT yield, also ejecting the WHOLE Core! Irradiating Northern hemisphere and Stratosphere and soil and all living beings. http://images.wikia.com/nuklear/images/7/79/Chernobyl_model.jpg Nuclear bombs are primitive: Less radiation, big destruction. Reactors: No crater, but the radioactive equivalent of thousands of bombs. http://tekknorg.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/reactor-core-bomb.jpg Chernobyl; Roughly 450 Kg Pu239. Nagasaki: 6,2 Kg Pu 239. http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/Artikel%20zu%20Tschernobyl%20in%20Nuclear%20Technology%20Vol%2090.pdf It was a nuclear explosion of the reactor (not of the bomb). The fuel was thrown out there completely. This is proven by Checherov, who was 1,500 times inside of the reactor, where once the fuel was: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zP5neBujiFU There his crew is on the lid of the reactor. They should be dead, but they aren’t. The IAEA is lying for 27 years. Checherov has 20 hrs of material. It can be seen: The reactor is empty. The lid was 2,000 tons, the fuel 192 tons, the energy release 1,2 terrajoule, the temperatures up to 4000 – 5000 K – this is all caused by a nuclear explosion. We can not afford to guess and be open for IAEA analyses – they never were in the reactor. with all fuel thrown out all radiation maps are wrong, by the factor 100 or 1,000, the development of diseases becomes plausible. a) http://tekknorg.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/scan05.jpg b) http://tekknorg.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/chernobyl-wasnuclearexplosion.jpg Checherov was THERE where IAEA says IS fuel, but there WASN’T and ISN’T any fuel. And he filmed it. This is the real proof. IAEA was never inside. We can not make reality a theory and than rather believe in theory than in reality. Do not confuse symbol with fact. And I know the person who was with him: Mr. Sebastian Pflugbeil. The fuel is gone! http://discover-decouvrir.cisti-icist.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/eng/article/?aid=2485630 Chernobyl explosion released 1,200 Gigajoules: http://books.google.de/books?id=pAsAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA61&dq=1200+gigajoules&hl=de&ei=oiLMTsfSNJGyhAfXh5ivDQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CDsQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=1200%20gigajoules&f=false ATOMIC EXPLOSION. Steam explosion: Maxium -> 50 Gigajoules. More: http://books.google.de/books?id=vgwAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA65#v=onepage&q&f=false I gave you all knowledge, do something with it! A reactor can explose nuclear and THROW EVERYTHING OUT! With this all reactors would have been stopped long ago! Do not let IAEA fool you! Let us share this knowledge, which comes as a light in the dark! Do not believe rule and textbook!

The most important thing we have, is the Genome

and love

Jan Hemmer

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 39 other followers