妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ
IT”S THE BEST GLOBAL MEASURMENT RADIATION NETWORK – IT COULD HELP HUMAN KIND. BUT ALL DATA IS COVERED UP!
Fukushima was INES 7 after 3 days – says CTBTO – IAEA ignores, World Health Organisation covers up: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/02/17/tepco-invents-fictitious-measurements-ctbto-data-covered-up/
How they work: http://www.ctbto.org/press-centre/press-releases/2011/ctbto-to-share-data-with-iaea-and-who/
Their cover up birthday party: http://www.ctbto.org/press-centre/press-releases/2012/un-secretary-general-proud-of-15-years-of-successful-fight-against-nuclear-testing-urge-entry-into-force-of-the-ctbt/
And what the UN says: “It is irresponsible to see this treaty still waiting to come into effect 15 years after it was opened for signature.” The unwillingness of the United States to ratify the treaty has been a key obstacle: http://www.thenewage.co.za/43724-1020-53-UN_chief_makes_new_call_for_nuclear_test_ban_implementation
The World Health Organisation WHO has to date the results of measurement to Fukushima under wraps, the WHO and the IAEA regularly receives from the international authority to monitor agreements on nuclear weapons test ban (CTBTO). The world’s 60 monitoring stations of the CTBTO to register around the clock, the radioactivity in the atmosphere.
The “Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics (ZAMG) in Vienna, which also has access to the measurement results of the CTBT0, presented at the end of fixed March with a significantly higher leakage of radioactivity from Fukushima, when the Japanese authorities – based on their data, the WHO and the IAEA – publicly announced. General Secretary Chan of the WHO said the WHO would publish CTBTO measurement data “only if it’s dangerous values.” If that was the case, they decide “alone”.
At the same time admitted the Director-General, that the WHO is “no expert on radiation,” and that the WHO “on this issue today almost at all has not within the jurisdiction more.” The Department of Radiobiology at the Geneva WHO headquarters was closed two years ago under pressure from private and public donors. Earlier, the deputy head of the department with the attempt to impose lower limits for WHO Iodine intake failed on objections by the IAEA and France: http://www.chernobylcongress.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/Baverstock_How_the_UN_works.pdf
I hereby demand that the results of the analyses conducted to measure the airborne radioactivity by the global network (TICEN) be made public, ENTIRELY AND WITHOUT ANY FURTHER DELAY:
english: http://petitions.criirad.org/?For-a-total-transparency-on-the
請願: http://petitions.criirad.org/?%E8%AB%8B%E9%A1%98%E6%9B%B8,34
française http://petitions.criirad.org/?-Petitions-
with kind regards,
Jan Hemmer
