Posts Tagged ‘Maria Neira’



CTBTO is world’s most advanced radiation measurement network, a direct result of President Kennedy’s a bomb test stop agenda: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AiuPubfL1AY

The Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) foresees a global ban of all nuclear explosions. To verify compliance with the CTBT, a global International Monitoring System (IMS) with four different measurement technologies is currently built up, namely for seismic (170 stations), hydroacoustic (11 stations), infrasound (80 stations) and radionuclide (80 stations) monitoring.

Radionuclide station network: 80 particulate radionclide stations with daily samples and detection sensitivity of 10 – 30 micro becquerel per m³

President Kennedy, June, 1963: “the number of children and grandchildren with cancer in their bones, with leukemia in their blood, or with poison in their lungs might seem statistically small to some, in comparison with natural health hazards, but this is not a natural health hazard–and it is not a statistical issue. The loss of even one human life, or the malformation of even one baby–who may be born long after we are gone–should be of concern to us all. Our children and grandchildren are not merely statistics toward which we can be indifferent.” http://www.ratical.org/radiation/inetSeries/RB89.html

Nobel peace laureate Linus Pauling proved, that by fallout of the atomic and h bomb tests of 1958 15.000 children with severe hereditary error came to the world in one year. 38,000 children were born dead. 90,000 were murdered inside of the mother.  http://books.google.de/books?id=2QduA19d_X8C&pg=PA1310&dq=Linus+Pauling:+Biomolecular+sciences+90,000&hl=de&ei=tXlGTuMWg8PxA4rQscoG&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CDEQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false In 1963 the radioactivity in milk was so high, the public got alarmed. But the USAEC denied everything. Former President Kennedy held his speech and demanded the bomb test stop. Ironically, the health authorities were particularly zealous advocates of nuclear bombs Supporters.

“Possible scale of lost or impaired children after Chernobyl in all of Europe and the part of Asia coveredMissing Children: 2,5 Million.” PAGE 34 http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/RIGEinEuroandCNPPc.pdf

60 particulate monitoring stations are currently delivering data to the International Data Centre of the Preparatory Commission for the CTBTO in Vienna.

Where also the IAEA sits: http://blogs.nature.com/news/2011/03/exclusive_governments_withhold.html


請願 http://www.cpdnp.jp/pdf/120521Takasaki_report_May11.pdf

German http://www.bfs.de/de/ion/imis/spurenmessungen.html

Philippine http://www.pnri.dost.gov.ph/index.php

Austrian http://www.zamg.ac.at/wetter/fukushima/

From Source: http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/11/28319/2011/acpd-11-28319-2011.pdf:

“Two stations of the CTBTO network, Okinawa and Takasaki, are located in Japan, but 133Xe (XENON) measurements are made only at Takasaki. However, the Takasaki noble gas detections were, for an extended period of time, reaching the dynamic range of the system, meaning that measurements were so high that they became unreliable. Regarding the 137Cs (CESIUM) measurements at Takasaki, there was another problem: During the first passage of the plume at this station, radioactivity entered the interior of the building. This resulted in a serious contamination, meaning that 137Cs shows up continuously in the measurements since the initial event, even when it is completely absent in the ambient air.”

THIS IS THE NETWORK: http://www.ctbto.org/map/#ims

and the only info we get: http://www.ctbto.org/press-centre/highlights/2011/fukushima-related-measurements-by-the-ctbto/fukushima-related-measurements-by-the-ctbto-page-2/


Air Research Institute NILU from Norway “We used both atmospheric activity concentration measurements as well as, for 137Cs, measurements of bulk deposition. Regarding 133Xe, we find a total release of 15.3 (uncertainty range 12.2–18.3) EBq, which is more than twice as high as the total release from Chernobyl and likely the largest radioactive noble gas release in history.” PDF: http://zardoz.nilu.no/~andreas/publications/219.pdf

Atmospheric Transport: http://www.eurad.uni-koeln.de/index_e.html

IAEA even houses CTBTO: http://www.ctbto.org/press-centre/press-releases/2011/ctbto-to-share-data-with-iaea-and-who/

CTBTO Data was sent to IAEA in the first hour while Fukushima began to explode. It is permanentely available to IAEA. IAEA Database has more than 1 million data measurements from all kinds of source.

This said Denis Flory of IAEA in March 2012. http://www.ctbto.org/press-centre/highlights/2012/one-year-after-fukushimathe-ctbtos-contributions/


ALL DATA IS CONCEALED: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/05/27/margaret-chan-versus-world-health-organisation/

Congratulations CTBTO! 15 years of Cover up by IAEA and W.H.O.


The World Health Organisation WHO has to date the results of measurement to Fukushima under wraps, the WHO and the IAEA regularly receives from the international authority to monitor agreements on nuclear weapons test ban (CTBTO). The world’s 60 monitoring stations of the CTBTO to register around the clock, the radioactivity in the atmosphere.

The “Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics (ZAMG) in Vienna, which also has access to the measurement results of the CTBT0, presented at the end of fixed March with a significantly higher leakage of radioactivity from Fukushima, when the Japanese authorities – based on their data, the WHO and the IAEA – publicly announced. General Secretary Chan of the WHO said the WHO would publish CTBTO measurement data  “only if it’s dangerous values.” If that was the case, they decide “alone”.

At the same time admitted the Director-General, that the WHO is “no expert on radiation,” and that the WHO “on this issue today almost at all has not within the jurisdiction more.” The Department of Radiobiology at the Geneva WHO headquarters was closed two years ago under pressure from private and public donors. Earlier, the deputy head of the department with the attempt to impose lower limits for WHO Iodine intake failed on objections by the IAEA and France: http://www.chernobylcongress.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/Baverstock_How_the_UN_works.pdf

I hereby demand that the results of the analyses conducted to measure the airborne radioactivity by the global network (TICEN) be made public, ENTIRELY AND WITHOUT ANY FURTHER DELAY:

english: http://petitions.criirad.org/?For-a-total-transparency-on-the

請願: http://petitions.criirad.org/?%E8%AB%8B%E9%A1%98%E6%9B%B8,34

française http://petitions.criirad.org/?-Petitions-

now, continuing with quotes from http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/11/28319/2011/acpd-11-28319-2011.pdf :

The CTBTO stations are all equipped with high-volume aerosol samplers. (…) As part of CTBT treaty monitoring, half of the radionuclide stations shall additionally be equipped with xenon detectors. FLEXPART is also the model operationally used at CTBTO for atmospheric backtracking and at the Austrian Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics for emergency response as well as CTBT verification purposes.

The UN General Assembly adopted the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court on July 17, 1998. On July 1, 2002 the statute came into force. “The International Criminal Court is a permanent tribunal to prosecute individuals for genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes.” (Wikipedia, 03/25/2011)

Thus far, the ICC has not accepted criminal or civil cases involving the destruction of natural resources and environmental terrorism. The establishment of its authority to do so is long overdue.

In relation to the ongoing accident at Fukushima, responsible officials from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the World Health Organization (WHO), the operating company (TEPCO) and Japanese nuclear power regulators should be brought before the International Criminal Court and held accountable for their actions.

Failure to aid in tens of thousands of cases and threats to natural resources hundreds of thousands if not millions of people is a Felony.

The behavior of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the World Health Organization (WHO) following the reactor accident of Fukushima is a scandal. WHO has made public statements trivializing the emergency and ceding all of its responsibilities to the IAEA, citing the treaty of 1957. “What is WHO’s role in nuclear emergencies? Answer by WHO: “Within the United Nations system, the IAEA is the lead agency for coordination of international response to radiation events.” (World Health Organization, Japan Nuclear Concerns, FAQ, 14 March 2011, Geneva)

The IAEA – an organization whose Board of Governors is dominated by and comprised almost entirely of nuclear industry members, holds fast to its opinion that Fukushima should be assessed at Level 5 on the International Rating scale for significant events in nuclear facilities (INES).

The quantity of radioactive Iodine-131 released is a central indicator for the evaluation of nuclear accidents on the INES scale. The release of more than “a few 10 ^ 16 Bq of iodine 131” is classified as a level 7 catastrophic accident this (INES) scale.

Apparently, the IAEA, TEPCO and the Japanese government officials in charge have not clearly stated how much radioactive material has been released throughout the unfolding of the Fukushima disaster. According to estimates by the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO), comprised of 60 monitoring stations world-wide under the auspices of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, the first three days of the Fukushima accident alone released about 3.8 x 10 ^ 17 Bq of radioactive Iodine-131. That is about 100 times the official inventory. The Fukushima disaster has also released significant amounts of several other radionuclides which have not even been measured.

Due to these figures, the Fukushima accident would have been legitimately classified as INES level 7 a long time ago. Greenpeace is now in the process of conducting its own analysis.

The behavior of WHO and the IAEA is therefore an unprecedented scandal. An inappropriately small evacuation zone is estimated to have resulted in the needless exposure of pregnant women, children, and other adults to excessive levels of radiation and radioactive contamination beyond 250mSv, the limit set for the recognition of work related cancer among Japanese nuclear power plant employees. Radiation biology assumes that if 10,000 people were exposed to a dose of 1 Sv, then 500 deaths are expected to occur as a result of their exposure (ICRP60) 500-1200 (BEIRV) 580-1740 (RERF), 2400 (Köhler). The ICRP – another profiteer of the atomic industry – made the recommendations for radiation protection standards, which were accepted by all countries and which were used o justify IAEA regulations.

Calculations based on models used by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) show that dietary intake of the maximum amount of radioactive contamination permitted in the EU and Japan would lead to at least roughly 150,000 fatalities in Germany each year. Other calculation models reach vastly higher figures. If the entire German population were to eat foods exposing individuals to only 5 percent of the contamination currently allowed in food imports from Japan, at least 7,700 fatalities could be expected; this figure doesn’t even include the secondary consequences of a wide range of greatly varying diseases and genetic disorders.


and: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/09/25/european-union-kills-legallly-150000-people-each-year-with-irradiated-food-in-germany/

TEPCO invents fictitious measurements – CTBTO Data covered up


Two stations of the CTBTO network, Okinawa and Takasaki, are located in Japan, but 133Xe (XENON) measurements are made only at Takasaki. However, the Takasaki noble gas detections were, for an extended period of time, reaching the dynamic range of the system, meaning that measurements were so high that they became unreliable.

VIDEOS about CTBTO / WHO / UNSCEAR -> One Club.




MORE MEDIA COVERAGE: http://www.ctbto.org/fileadmin/user_upload/public_information/2011/Updated_list_CTBTO_Fukushima_media_coverage_March-June.pdf

On PDF Page 59 of TEPCO document 1-8 we find: 4 x 10 mSv (per hour? I think so) at a distance of 0,28 km: http://www.scribd.com/doc/88568685/%E7%A6%8F%E5%B3%B6%E7%AC%AC%E4%B8%80%E5%8E%9F%E7%99%BA%E4%BA%8B%E6%95%85%E7%9B%B4%E5%BE%8C%E3%81%8B%E3%82%89%E3%81%AE%E7%8F%BE%E5%A0%B4%E3%81%A8%E6%94%BF%E5%BA%9C%E3%81%AE%E3%82%84%E3%82%8A%E5%8F%96%E3%82%8AFAX1-8 – which is exactly the the 40 mSv/h mentioned in this NRC correspondence on PDF page 15 (“There was a media report of a 40-rem dose measured somewhere near the plant.”): http://www.houseoffoust.com/fukushima/NRCFOIA/ML12052A106.pdf in my view, this speaks for brutal high radiation, if we take into account, that the air even weakens the concentration. This is 4 times the daily dose at a 1000 Curie per km² area, for example near Chernobyl reactor 4 / hot sport, with 37 mio becquerel per m² (map): http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/Chernobyl-map.jpg and I _think_ this speaks for the lost inventory of containment and inventory. Because it is also reactor fuel, that is all over there (494 Kg of Plutonium 239 was in the burnup fuel): Page 6 right top: http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/Artikel%20zu%20Tschernobyl%20in%20Nuclear%20Technology%20Vol%2090.pdf
According to KAWATA Toumio, Fellow of the Nuclear Waste Management Organization of Japan (NUMO), all reactor inventory of Fukushima Reactor 2 was released on March 14th 2011, 6:22 pm: http://www.strahlentelex.de/Stx_11_588_S01-02.pdf

For a transparent Future!

Jan Hemmer

Read Full Post »


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 71 other followers