The Nuclear Cancer inside of the United Nations

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

This is the cancerous structure & influence of the NUCLEAR INDUSTRY inside of the UNITED NATIONS:

2012 IAEA annual budget:  € 331 million – enough to buy the United Nations.

How the UN works: “know thine enemy” or at least who it is:
http://www.chernobylcongress.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/Baverstock_How_the_UN_works.pdf

“it is recognized by the World Health Organization that the International Atomic Energy Agency has the primary responsibility for encouraging, assisting and coordinating research and development and practical application of atomic energy for peaceful uses throughout the world without prejudice to the right of the World Health Organization to concern itself with promoting, developing, assisting and coordinating international health work, including research, in all its aspects. ”
http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/Others/inf20.shtml#note_c

This is the reason why UN sees no rise in cancer due to Fukushima:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/31/us-japan-fukushima-un-idUSBRE94U0KR20130531

VERSUS:

Radiation Is Always Dangerous, Says World Health Organization Director-General: 
http://concernforhealth.org/radiation-is-always-dangerous-says-world-health-organization-director-general/

No immediate Danger:
http://www.ratical.org/radiation/inetSeries/NID.html

Basically, each cell can respond to injury with four responses:

1) The damage is so severe that the cell dies.

2) The cell can repair the damage (in children see above).

3) The cell loses its ability to produce certain substances, such as in the pancreas gland which can not produce insulin anymore (increase of diabetes in Belarus among children and adults) or other digestive juices during the growth, of the thyroid hormones.

4) The malignant cells degenerate and there is cancer.

It is now clear: Any radiation poses a risk especially for children who are extremely radiosensitive:
http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2013/04/22/atoms-for-peaceful-murder/

These BANKS support the NUCLEAR HOLOCAUST:
http://www.nuclearbanks.org

And they cover up the fact, that Chernobyl lost it’s whole Core, by paying for the new USELESS sarcophagus: Nearly no fuel left in Chernobyl 4 reactor – footage, interviews, starting at 07:55:

IAEA lies to us since 1986.

MORE:
http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/11/12/the-atomic-reactor-explosions-of-fukushima-and-chernobyl/

IAEA, UNCESCO, IRSN, ICRP: Playing down radiation in Fukushima and Chernobyl is scientifically valid:
http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/03/22/iaea-uncesco-icrp-playing-down-radiation-in-fukushima-and-chernobyl-is-scientifically-valid/

VERSUS: Natural Radiation already damaging:

“The renowned British biologist, J.B.S. Haldane, suggested in 1948 that perpetual exposure to natural background radiation might account for most of humanity’s accumulated burden of inherited afflictions”:
http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/Asleep@Wheel.html#Part2 

“Natural background radiation is the mutagen which accounts for 25% or more of those cases of Irregularly Inherited Afflictions which occur because of inherited predisposition.”
http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/Asleep@Wheel.html#Part2

different areas in New York State , 1956: Increased natural radioactivity of the soil by uranium, thorium. Increased mortality of newborns and developmental defects. 20 to 40 percent higher. One percent per mrad (0.00001 Gray):
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1372765/?tool=pmcentrez

More:
http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/09/02/radiation-larger-effect-of-small-doses/

ICRP has confirmed in 1966 that natural radiation is harmful! ICRP Publication Number 8 from 1966 on page 60. in relation to the health damage caused by natural radiation for the bulk of the world’s population is a risk of sixth order (1 to 10 dead per million per rad / gray) in a few areas with high natural background radiation the risk fifth order. 10 to 100 dead per million and rad (gray). and in 1977 the ICRP publication number 26 said, that, in this sense, regional differences of the natural radiation are so regarded, that the corresponding differences include the damage. and in the ’80s the natural radiation was simply doubled. and in 2011 it became the twentyfold in japan: 20 mSv/a:
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/breaking-news/japanese-ire-over-radiation-limit-for-kids/story-e6frf7jx-1226061484710

UN Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health, Mr. Anand Grover: Country Visit to Japan, 15 to 26 November 2012

http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=12831&LangI

Versus:

Until 1990 ICRP said it is not necessary to evacuate people, as long as the radiation does not exceed 500 mSv.:
http://books.google.de/books?id=Ber3ENERfGwC&pg=PA343&lpg=PA343&dq=ICRP+40++500mSv&source=bl&ots=IaOqT2MqK2&sig=l3l0MYGe_nKkaXxvFZxkkG8hP5M&hl=de&ei=gc81TpqyI4PfsgajxLG5Ag&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=8&ved=0CE0Q6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=ot%20exceed%20500%20mSv.%20The%20ICRP&f=false

WHO: Covering Up Chernobyl:
http://mondediplo.com/2008/04/14who

German IPPNW (PSR) Doctors: “40,000 to 80,000 new cancers”:
http://www.focus.de/gesundheit/ratgeber/krebs/news/schreckliche-folgen-von-fukushima-aerzte-befuerchten-zehntausende-krebsfaelle-mehr_aid_937053.html

“Thyroid Abnormalities are Precancerous Condition”

“Tens of thousands of cases of cancer” 

“Expect more than 100,000 cancer cases”

“4,300 missing children“

“Thyroid cysts and nodes with in more than 55,000 children alone in Fukushima prefecture (only one of the 47 islands)”

“42 percent of children in the prefecture have thyroid abnormalities”

“infant mortality increased by about 4 percent.”

The German IPPNW (nobel peace price 1985) attacks the World Health Organisation (complicity with IAEA since 1959):
http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/05/27/margaret-chan-versus-world-health-organisation/

Three German Sources:

1)
http://www.taz.de/Atomkatastrophe-Fukushima/!112316/

2)
http://www.n-tv.de/politik/Zehntausende-Krebsfaelle-zu-erwarten-article10248721.html

3)
http://www.ippnw.de/startseite/artikel/5c295cd947/gesundheitliche-folgen-von-fukushima-2.html

WHO downplayed health effects of nuclear crisis on Fukushima residents : German physician: 
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2012/12/16/national/who-downplayed-health-effects-of-nuclear-crisis-on-fukushima-residents-german-physician/#.UToaJGeJ07o

The main way in which the “radiation protection industry” has succeeded in hugely underrating the ill-health caused by nuclear power is by insisting on a group of extremely restrictive definitions as to what qualifies as a radiation-caused illness statistic. For example, under IAEA’s criteria:

>    If a radiation-caused cancer is not fatal, it is not counted in the IAEA’s figures

>    If a cancer is initiated by another carcenogen, but accelerated or promoted by exposure to radiation, it is not counted.

>    If an auto-immune disease or any non-cancer is caused by radiation, it is not counted.

>    Radiation-damaged embryos or foetuses which result in miscarriage or stillbirth do not count

>    A congenitally blind, deaf or malformed child whose illnesses are are radiation-related are not included in the figures because this is not genetic damage, but rather is teratogenic, and will not be passed on later to the child’s offspring.

>    Causing the genetic predisposition to breast cancer or heart disease does not count since it is not a “serious genetic disease” in the Mendelian sense.

>    Even if radiation causes a fatal cancer or serious genetic disease in a live born infant, it is discounted if the estimated radiation dose is below 100 mSv [mSv= millisievert, a measurement of radiation exposure. One hundred millsievert is the equivalent in radiation of about 100 X-Rays].

>    Even if radiation causes a lung cancer, it does not count if the person smokes — in fact whenever there is a possibility of another cause, radiation cannot be blamed.

>    If all else fails, it is possible to claim that radiation below some designated dose does not cause cancer, and then average over the whole body the radiation dose which has actually been received by one part of the body or even organ, as for instance when radio-iodine concentrates in the thyroid. This arbitrary dilution of the dose will ensure that the 100 mSv cut-off point is nowhere near reached. It is a technique used to dismiss the sickness of Gulf War veterans who inhaled small particles of ceramic uranium which stayed in their lungs for more than two years, and in their bodies for more than eight years, irradiating and damaging cells in a particular part of the body.

quote by Dr. Rosalia Bertell, November 1999 issue of The Ecologist, pp. 408-411:
http://ratical.org/radiation/NAvictims.html

IPPNW Fukushima Info ENGLISH:
http://www.fukushima-disaster.de/deutsche-information/super-gau.html

IPPNW Fukushima Info JAPANESE:
http://www.fukushima-disaster.de/information-in-english/maximum-credible-accident.html

IPPNW Fukushima Info GERMAM:
http://www.fukushima-disaster.de/deutsche-information/super-gau.html

At the Chernobyl IAEA forum the term “Radiophobia” was invented and used: “What’s worse, the IAEA is going public these days with statements ridiculing the so called “radiophobia” of the population and calling for an end of aid programs, which, according to the IAEA report of 2005, only serve to instil a victim mentality in a totally healthy population – a claim not only cynical, but potentially dangerous for the health of the affected population.” Source:
http://www.ippnw-students.org/chernobyl/coverup.html

“Presently the international organizations (WHO, IAEA) recognize as the main cause of increase of thyroid cancer in liquidators and children population after the accident their irradiation with radioactive iodine, I-131. The rest of diseases, they suppose, are provoked by psycho-emotional reactions..” (!!!…RADIOPHOBIA…!!!) There is no linear dose effect correlation, but “The bimodal dependence of effects on dose was revealed for all studied parameters. Namely, effects increased at low doses, reached maximum (for low doses), then decreased (in some cases the effect sign reversed) and thereafter increased with the increase of dosage”:
http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Burlakova.pdf
IGNORED BY IAEA, UNSCEAR, ICRP, WHO

Margaret Chan VERSUS World Health Organisation:
http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/05/27/margaret-chan-versus-world-health-organisation/

by former independentwho.org website:

NEW VERSION:
http://independentwho.org/en/who-and-aiea-aggreement/

History and Structure of the UN

The Treaty of Versailles signed in 1919 set up the League of Nations, an international organisation whose aim was to keep the peace in Europe after the First World War. The objectives of the LoN included: disarmament; the prevention of war through the principle of collective security; the resolution of conflicts by negotiation and by an improvement in the quality of life world wide. Benito Mussolini said : “The League of Nations is very effective when the sparrows cry, but not at all when the eagles attack.”
After some considerable successes and a few failures in the 1920’s, the League of Nations proved unequal to the task of preventing the aggression of the Axis powers in the 1930’s. The start of the Second World War showed that the LoN had failed in its primary objective which had been to avoid a new world war. The United Nations Organisation replaced it at the end of the War and inherited from it a number of agencies and organisations.

21st August 1944		The opening of the Dumbarton Oaks Conference, bringing together the United States, China, The United Kingdom and the USSR.
25th April 1945		Conference in San Francisco bringing together 51 nations with the aim of establishing a charter for the United Nations.
26th June 1945		The United Nations Charter is signed by 51 nations.
24th October 1945		The United Nations Charter is ratified by 51 nations.      OFFICIAL BIRTH OF THE UN
22nd July 1946		Creation of WHO.
10th December 1948		The UN adopts the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
July 1957		Creation of the IAEA.
28th May 1959		Signing of the Agreement WHA 12-40 between WHO and IAEA.

The UN is divided into 7 organisations, of which two are of interest to us, the Economic and Social Council and the Security Council. The “Economic and Social Council” oversees ALL the United Nations agencies with the exception of the “IAEA”. In fact, the IAEA is the only agency that reports directly to the “Security Council” which is made up of representatives of 15 countries, of which 5 are permanent members of the Council : the United States, the Untied Kingdom, the Russian Federation, China and France. These 5 nations are all nuclear powers, both civil and military, and almost all are exporters of nuclear technology.
The 10 remaining members (or countries) have a mandate which lasts for 2 years.
The influence of these 5 permanent members of the Security Council on policy making within the IAEA is enormous and ongoing. With no counterbalancing power, it is almost impossible to claim that the IAEA has an objective view of the nuclear industry and the consequences of its use.

On 28th May 1959, the IAEA (not yet two years old !) and WHO signed an agreement referred to as “WHA 12-40” which, though it might, on paper, appear balanced and reciprocal, in practice, puts WHO in a subordinate position to the IAEA.

The IAEA wants the people make believe, that the main effect of the atomic catastrophe is psychological. This is made in these steps:

- Make the people believe, that because of background radiation every additional radiation is natural, normal, not bad (known as the principle of “substantial equivalence”)

- Tell the people, that Fukushima is not as bad as Chernobyl, and, Chernobyl was a small accident (50 deaths acc. to WHO, 125,000 deaths acc. to Ukrainian health minisry 1993).

- Make the people believe, that any other statement is panic and unobjective (The IAEA uses the word “Radiophobia” for Chernobyl)

- The IAEA recognizes the disease in highly contaminated areas as not in connection with the contamination.

- Make sure that there are no independent measurements, only measurements by the atomic power plant operator, it is also important NOT to show radiation measurements during the TV weather forecasts.

- Make sure that there are no organized measurements at all, for each region, each plant, each city – especially not in the media. Or do reconstrucion on the basis of official data, which are often too low.

- Advise the officals with authentic language

- Advise the government to install a 30 km No Enter Zone – invented and used during the atomic weapon test in the U.S. – but 30 km is not enough for an atomic reactor accident.

- Refuse cancer studies like the german KiKK study as unscientific

- Raise radiation limits for different groups of people, so that different values ​​can be measured but each is normal, and below the limt

with kind regards,

Jan Hemmer

Read Full Post »

Radiation: Larger effect of small doses!

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

> BEIR III admits Petkau Effect: If gamma radiation comes from EXTERNAL, it starts protective action of the enzyme. When irradiated from the INSIDE with beta radiation of tritium, there is no protective effect: page 469 – 469
http://iopscience.iop.org/0260-2814/1/2/002/

MEANS: The lower and slower a dose is, the less it is recognized by the body. So, it causes more damage, tha high and fast doses from outside. This means: ALL REACTOR CHIMNEY EMISSIONS:
http://tekknorg.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/ge-ari2.jpg

“The renowned British biologist, J.B.S. Haldane, suggested in 1948 that perpetual exposure to natural background radiation might account for most of humanity’s accumulated burden of inherited afflictions”:
http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/Asleep@Wheel.html#Part2 

“Natural background radiation is the mutagen which accounts for 25% or more of those cases of Irregularly Inherited Afflictions which occur because of inherited predisposition.”
http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/Asleep@Wheel.html#Part2

Oxidization in YOUR DNA:
http://moribin.blog114.fc2.com/blog-entry-1700.html

LOW RADIATION becomes HIGH RADIATION when ingested with food – Low Doses of Radiation – Objective Laws of their Action and Risk:
http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/BurlakovaChernobyl-Belarus.pdf

= Internal Emitters are 10 to 100 times more dangerous than their external equivalent:
http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/06/17/nuclear-cancer-industry/

+ Children’s Mitosis even accelerates this damage, because their cells divide faster than in adults, copying the damage to the next cells, having NO TIME to repair. Faster metabolism does not help.

IAEA, WHO, UNSCEAR, ICRP even BEIR see no difference between INTERNAL and EXTERNAL radiation – this is the reason for fraud dose limits and ultimatively ATOMIC DARWINISM

Genomic Instability is caused by Internal Emitters in the body, from irradiated food, by man made nuclear fission.

RADIATION > FREE RADICAL > CELL DAMAGE > TISSUE DAMAGE > DISEASE
http://www.nuclearreader.info/chapter4.html

Hiroshima & Nagsaki: Birth of a killer dose limit Agenda (T65D study 1950):
http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/08/10/hiroshima-nagsaki-birth-of-a-killer-dose-limit-agenda-t65d-study-1950/

EVIDENCES:

> Hanford USA: Extremely elevated cancer incidence in staff despite lower radiation exposure: At that time, the 20-fold reduction of the dose limit was requested: By all means the officials have tried to refute the work. It was said the amounts of radiation had been measured incorrectly. It is nevertheless argued that  such employees are monitored precisely!
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/422389

> Portsmouth dockyard workers who repair nuclear submarines: 5.6 times higher rate of leukemia in 1978:
http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2878%2990741-9/abstract

> different areas in New York State , 1956: Increased natural radioactivity of the soil by uranium, thorium. Increased mortality of newborns and developmental defects. 20 to 40 percent higher. One percent per mrad (0.00001 Gray):
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1372765/?tool=pmcentrez

> Close relationship between stillbirths with visible deformities and the intensity of cosmic radiation. 1960: 1.8 malformations per 1000 births at the equator. About 50 degrees north latitude: 5 malformations per 1000 births. Explainable by Petkau Effect. With the effects of radiation on the nucleus (hereditary), the greatly increased number of stillbirths would have been unable to explain:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13844093

> In many cases, increased chromosomal abnormalities in the blood of people living on thorium-containing Monozite sandy soil. Residents and workers were examined. Ten-fold increase of lead 212 in the air (beta rays) increased chromosomal defects from 0.9 to 2 percent. Another ten-fold increase in lead 212 concentration increased defects by 0.57 percent. Means: A larger effect of smaller doses:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1762904/

> 1984, New Scientist: Internal studies of the DOE Department of Energy: Workers of twelve different nuclear plants. Nine of the studies found up to 50% higher leukemia rates, above average: lung cancer, lymphoma, brain cancer, malignant tumors of the digestive organs. Common diseases of the respiratory system were more frequent. 2,529 workers were examined in plants of the DOE. All workers had received more than 50 mSv per year. The cancer rate was three times higher:
http://books.google.de/books?id=YIAzHckpZswC&pg=PA3&lpg=PA3#v=onepage&q&f=false

> If Oxygen in cells is replaced by nitrogen, the dose must be many times increased to destroy of the membranes. Thus, the damaging role of oxygen is demonstrated (free radicals: O negative):
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/abs/10.1139/m74-049

> Even pro nuclear BEIR III 1980 report shows: The protection of the membrane is possible by enzymes and substances. These bind free radicals. This is indirect evidence for the oxidation of the membranes in living Systems:
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/201/4359/875.short

> The lower the concentration of strontium-90 in rat bone, the greater the damage to the bone marrow:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5748432
“the dose rates are too low to reduce the ‘requisite’ repair levels” PAGE 4
http://www.solarsplendor.com/Nuclear%20Research/Biological%20low-dose%20radiation%20effects.pdf

> human blood cells of radiologists and X-ray technicians (Universtity of California): For rubidium cell membranes were more permeable – So, more damage, than regular staff. The largest increase of the damage was at the lowest total doses. Percentage: A hundred times larger.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4683533

> With a high dose rate of 1900 rad (19 Gray) per minute – with nuclear explosions – is the total dose of 2000 Rad (20 Gray) needed to damage cell membranes of blood:
http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/3572559?uid=2129&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&sid=21101160429691

> Rats inhaled plutonium dust – Doubling dose for cancer was only 180 mrad (1.8 milli Gray). According to conservative ICRP and IAEA guidelines, it would have amounted to 395 rad – 3.95 Gray! But it was only 1,8 milli Gray! ICRP’s estimates has been miscalculated to the 190-fold!
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4358363

> Hamsters: Larger effect of small doses: Polonium 210 was applied to their lungs: The largest increase of cancer cases arose at the lowest total radiation dose (see Petkau, Chelack, Stokke, Scott Sanders – all above): 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/639040

> Hamsters: 15 times more lung cancer by Polonium 210 in samll units over 15 weeks, than a TOTAL dose of the same amount at once: Mac Candy R.B. et al “Exp. Lung Cancer” Springer Verlag, 1974, p. 485 (
http://books.google.de/books?id=kkxzmBwKt78C&pg=PA208&lpg=PA208&dq=Mac+Candy+R.B.+et+al+%22Exp.+Lung+Cancer%22+Springer+Verlag,+1974&source=bl&ots=szKH-CV3in&sig=kaT6Wsm9k2-RlwSWYJVdEscr_UU&hl=de#v=onepage&q=Mac%20Candy%20R.B.%20et%20al%20%22Exp.%20Lung%20Cancer%22%20Springer%20Verlag%2C%201974&f=false
)

ONLY 7 (seven!) mSv destroy cell membranes if you use a dose rate of 0,01 mSv per minute. IF YOU use a dose rate of 260 (!) mSv per minute you have to wait until 35,000 (35 thousand!) mSv are reached! This is 5,000 times more energy! Although the first dose is low and slow This means: Slow and low doses are (over the years) MORE DANGEROUS than high doses!

http://journals.lww.com/health-physics/Abstract/1972/03000/Effect_of_22Na__on_a_Phospholipid_Membrane.4.aspx

Erythrocytes / Tradescantia and bone marrow cells are destroyed and mutate by slow and low doses:
http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-1-4615-8972-3_7
/
http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/jyd74e00/pdf;jsessionid=8A62A199CCC3408148BD21A7212E566C.tobacco03

The rise of non-leukemia cancers in the 20th century:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1567333/bin/envhper00395-0049-a.jpg

“It is important to study the effect of low-level irradiation at the population level /in an exposed human population the number of people whose blood cells do not give an adaptive response to subsequent exposures has increased / it was shown that 15 generations of cells irradiated with the doses 10 to 50 cGy (100 to 500 milli Gray) “remember” the irradiation and respond to external stimuli differently than the control.” PAGE 60
http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/chernobylebook.pdf

Presently the international organizations (WHO, IAEA) recognize as the main cause of increase of thyroid cancer in liquidators and children population after the accident their irradiation with radioactive iodine, I-131. The rest of diseases, they suppose, are provoked by psycho-emotional reactions. 
http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Burlakova.pdf

The bimodal dependence of effects on dose was revealed for all studied parameters. Namely, effects increased at low doses, reached maximum (for low doses), then decreased (in some cases the effect sign reversed) and thereafter increased with the increase of dosage.

An excpert from the movie “Nuclear Controversis” by Wladimir Tchertkoff:

Fernex – Don’t you think that during 15 years, the majority of Caesium is internal?

Gentner (UNSCEAR)– No. It’s not internal. Are you talking about the external exposure that people receive?

Fernex – I am speaking of the internal one, which they receive through food in very large population.

Gentner (UNSCEAR)– I refuse to think that whether a radiation dose is internal or external, what counts is the dose received by whatever mechanism and to prey on people’s consciousness to say that somehow, because it’s internal, it’s worse, doesn’t do service to the people.

Fernex – There are cardiac diseases found in humans, found in children which may lead to sudden death.

Gentner (UNSCEAR)– OK, we know these complications, these things are arising. But to simply say that these things have occurred following the accident, and to infer from that a blind acceptance that they are radiation related, doesn’t allow the public health authorities of these countries to serve their people.

Fernex – There are doses related in children.

Gentner (UNSCEAR)– I have not seen any information on that.

Fernex – There are universities in Belarus which have been working on this topic for nine years. And you never had any interest to what they did?
http://vivretchernobyl.blogspot.de/2008/06/w-tchertkof-nuclear-controversies.html

If the food you EAT contains 1 becquerel of let’s say Cesium 137 – it’s not safe. You eat many times a day, many days a week, a month, a year, a whole LIFE. And the Full Decay Time of Cesium 137 is 300 years -> 10 HUMAN GENERATIONS – and it’s coming from every reactor, each second. That’s what we are talking about, if we say “the food is safe, it’s below the limit” – it means YOU EAT and YOU STORE it in your BODY. Becquerel after Becquerel. ALL THE TIME. After years you have hundreds and thousands of Becquerel in your body. This is not known, because Whole Body Counters for Internal Radionuclide Measurments are not as common as CT or X-Ray machines.

Cesium 137 decays into Barium – blocking the Receptors. And it sends out Gamma + Beta, destroying 100% on the cellular level. 1 becquerel = 100 % damage. ALWAYS.Mitosis: The cell in the child is damaged: Cell wants to repair, can’t, because it divides to fast (Children grow), so we have 2 damaged cells, and so on, and so on -> Cancer latency of children is very very short. But as always Doctors, Health Organisations and Authorities and even Parents blame everything else. The Atomic Industry gets away. More cancer = More profit.

“Recently, in a concerted effort to raise the permissible levels of radiation for workers and the public, members of the Heath Physics Society have been actively promoting their theory of Hormesis, namely, that low dose exposures to radiation induce “beneficial” effects such as longevity, robustness, radio-resistance and increased growth. The use of the term “beneficial” implies a judgment, not a scientific fact. Experiments backing these hypotheses have been difficult to reproduce and definitions of “beneficial” have been controversial and appear very subjective. Claims of low dose hormesis have frequently been based on high dose observations, and the only mechanisms offered for these effects has been speculation on repair overshoot at the cellular and genome level. Cell growth as “hormetic” is the most troubling claim, since illicit growth stimulation signifies catastrophe for biological organisms.” FROM
http://www.ccnr.org/radiation_standards.html

BIMODAL: “Presently the international organizations (WHO, IAEA) recognize as the main cause of increase of thyroid cancer in liquidators and children population after the accident their irradiation with radioactive iodine, I-131. The rest of diseases, they suppose, are provoked by psycho-emotional reactions..” (!!!…RADIOPHOBIA…!!!) There is no linear dose effect correlation, but “The bimodal dependence of effects on dose was revealed for all studied parameters. Namely, effects increased at low doses, reached maximum (for low doses), then decreased (in some cases the effect sign reversed) and thereafter increased with the increase of dosage”:
http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Burlakova.pd
f IGNORED BY IAEA, UNSCEAR, ICRP, WHO

with kind regards,

Jan Hemmer

Read Full Post »

Hiroshima & Nagsaki: Birth of a killer dose limit Agenda (T65D study 1950)

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

“The ionizing radiation stimulations are “illicit” in the sense that there is no equivalent stimulation of the arachidonic pathway after non-radiological physiological stimulation, making it pathogenic in character, difficult for the body to regulate and return to homeostasis. This response activates the monocytes, which kill themselves by the oxidants they produce, often ending up as pus along with their digested cellular victims. They can endanger the host by killing other tissue, for example, transplants or infarcted heart tissue. Activated monocytes are carcinogenic, provoking hitherto latent oncogenic systems and genomic errors to replicate. This may well be one of the mechanisms by which cancers were increased within the first ten years after the Chernobyl disaster. These cancers were dismissed by the IAEA as not radiation related because the ICRP required latency period of ten years had not been completed. These were radiation promoted or accelerated cancers, not radiation induced cancers. Again, we see ICRP recognizing only radiation induced cancers, whereas the victim will experience both mechanisms as due to the disaster.”
http://www.ccnr.org/radiation_standards.html#at

The Criminality of Japan’s Radiation Effects Researchers:
http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr139/pdf/watanabe.pdf

“To say there is no effect and ignore the issue, just because it has not been scientifically proven, is not a scientific response.”

RERF is the successor to the ABCC (Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission) – which today is NRC in USA. MILITARY!
http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/No1Escapes.html

Dr Itsuzo Shigematsu – chairman RERF @ Hiroshima Institute.
He set up the limit of the dose for the resettlement and maximum values for contaminated food:
http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/03/22/iaea-uncesco-icrp-playing-down-radiation-in-fukushima-and-chernobyl-is-scientifically-valid/

Hiroshima & Nagasaki: The T65D study from 1950 (by US military) is applicable to all dose limits and food “safety” that we have today: All internal emitters are ignored, latency is ignored, children and fetuses are ignored. T65D is a nuclear holocaust in slow motion: The international radiation protection bodies such as ICRP, UNSCEAR and BEIR base their findings on the somatic damage (cancer, leukemia risks) mainly on studies of the victims of the nuclear tests of Nagasaki and Hiroshima, wo still lived in 1950. That’s right, not 1945, 1950! This study is called “T65D.” It was begun in 1950. The five years before that has not been studied. It was observed since 1950. About 800,000 Japanese people harmed by radiation, and the analysation of their causes of death.
http://www.rerf.or.jp/glossary_e/t65d.htm
and:
http://www.rerf.or.jp/library/archives_e/lsstitle.html
/ For validation of this study the US even did an atomic test in Nevada:
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/212/4497/900.extract
More: “Since 1950, more than 90,000 of the survivors of the atomic bombings at Hiroshima and Nagasaki have been enrolled in a lifetime study of their health”:
http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/RIC/chp4F.html
/ Alteration of the study:
http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/RIC/chp5F.html

“the famous failure to detect (at a statistically significant level) any extra frequency of inherited afflictions, in the Japanese children of the Atomic Bomb Survivors”:
http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/Asleep@Wheel.html

From 2012 -> new Cover Up in the making:
http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ201211200069

Quote “Radiation protection norms are a HOAX: “Since 1950, more than 90,000 of the survivors of the atomic bombings at Hiroshima and Nagasaki have been enrolled in a lifetime study of their health. The study, first conducted by the Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission (ABCC), was transferred in 1975 to control by the Radiation Effects Research Foundation (RERF), which has its headquarters at 5-2 Hijiyama Park, Minami-Ku, Hiroshima 732, Japan. and true magnitude of the radiation risk. RERF is equally funded by the government of Japan through its Ministry of Health and Welfare and by the government of the United States via the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) under contract with the Department of Energy (DOE)…”
Each person has been exposed to a certain dose of radiation that had to be estimated later (!) Because of the location of the bomb explosion at the moment (T65D study). It is at HIGH DOSE SHORT TERM (explosion). This is in contrast to chronic low-level radiation. ICRP, UNSCEAR and BEIR exclude results that you get from high doses to the low dose effects. THIS IS A CRIME and unscientific and unethic.

info by Kitagawa Takashi

“RERF （放影研）admitted Internal Emitter is not considered as risk factor.
Every decision making is made by RERF’s knowledge which neglects the Internal Emitter.
Accordingly the standard for food and drink as well.

Evidence Video(Pict. is a critical Scene cut)”

This speech was delivered Nov. 14, 2011 at the Foreign Correspondents’ Club.(日本海外特派員協会) Dr. Hida’s speech bigins from 13’30″;

http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/18530453

“Sawada Shoji, emeritus professor of physics at Nagoya University and a Hiroshima survivor, confirms, that the Hiroshima studies never looked at fallout: they looked at “gamma rays and neutrons emitted within a minute of the explosion,” but did not consider the effects of residual radiation over time, effects from inhalation or ingestion that “are more severe.”
http://www.ratical.org/radiation/radioactivity/ScienceWithASkew.pdf 

http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/routledg/mcs/2007/00000023/00000001/art00006

If gamma radiation comes from EXTERNAL, it starts protective action of the enzyme. When irradiated from the INSIDE with beta radiation of tritium, there is no protective effect:
http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/09/02/radiation-larger-effect-of-small-doses/

“Another century of nuclear power, and this carnage would continue with more than 10 million victims a year. An industry which has the potential to kill, injure and maim that number of innocent people- and all in the name of ‘benefitting’ society – is surely wholly unacceptable. ”
http://exacteditions.theecologist.org/read/ecologist/vol-29-no-7-november-1999-5368/31/3/

We all live in the atomic fire, “proven safe” by T65D Hiroshima & Nagsaki Study.

“Up to 1,300 million people have been killed, maimed or diseased by nuclear power since its inception. The industry’s figures massively underestimate the real cost of nuclear power, in an attempt to hide
its victims from the world.”
http://exacteditions.theecologist.org/read/ecologist/vol-29-no-7-november-1999-5368/29/2/

FAKE SCIENCE:
http://www.foe.arc.net.au/kohnlein/kohnpaper.html

“Nagasawa and Little have noticed that alpha-particles already a doses as low as 0,3 mGy leads to significant increase in frequency of sister chromatid exchanges in Chinese Hamster ovary cells…”
http://www.foe.arc.net.au/kohnlein/kohnpaper4.html

“there is no safe dose, no safe-dose rate, nor a safe dose threshold”:
http://www.foe.arc.net.au/kohnlein/kohnpaper2.html

Atomic Wounds – At 89, Doctor Hida, a survivor of the 1945 atomic bomb at Hiroshima, continues to care for some of the other quarter of a million survivors. Atomic Wounds retraces his dedicated journey and highlights how the terrible danger of radiation was concealed by successive American administrations in the 50′s – 70′s so that nuclear power could be freely developed, with no concern for public health.
http://www.youtube.com/movie?v=_EOeRb-ddqc&ob=av1e&feature=mv_sr

800 tons of DU is the atomicity equivalent of 83,000 Nagasaki bombs. The U.S. has used more DU since 1991 than the atomicity equivalent of 400,000 Nagasaki bombs. Four nuclear wars indeed, and 10 times the amount of radiation released into the atmosphere from atmospheric testing! SOURCE:
http://www.ratical.org/radiation/DU/KYagasakiOnDU.pdf

President Kennedy, June, 1963: “the number of children and grandchildren with cancer in their bones, with leukemia in their blood, or with poison in their lungs might seem statistically small to some, in comparison with natural health hazards, but this is not a natural health hazard–and it is not a statistical issue. The loss of even one human life, or the malformation of even one baby–who may be born long after we are gone–should be of concern to us all. Our children and grandchildren are not merely statistics toward which we can be indifferent.”
http://www.ratical.org/radiation/inetSeries/RB89.html

Kofi Annan about Chernobyl: “the exact number of victims may never be known, but that 3 million children require treatment and “many will die prematurely.”
http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=20000426&slug=4017441
Today? Not a single word about Fukushima.

The crimes TODAY: Dr. Yamashia and Fukushima Medical University are pro nuclear:
http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/06/03/fukushima-medical-unversity-accelerating-children-death/

“The biggest risk is the “Internal Emitter” which is totally different from external radiation as IAEA, ICRP, UNSCER, RERF, NIRS of MEXT asserts that less than 100mSv is uncertain. It is KNOWN: Internal Emitter of lower dose ACCUMELATE. Even IAEA admit this in the Publication 111.(Evidence is the Picture Attached. See this carefully, No doubt. Continuous Lower dose accumulates in your body in long time. IN THIS PICTURE 1000 days, less than 3 years.) Dr.Yamashita USES Publication 103 which do not admit this and OUT OF DATE. (This is really, really CHEAP TRICK.)

Possible fact is revealed by a doctor of Fukushima.
There’ll be thousands of these examples available in the future. (Within 3 years according to the CHART attached.)
This is not child but rather old husband and wife in 70′s.
WBC detected 20,000Bq of Cesium in their body.There are clear evidences and scientific analysis of the mechanism. Your DNA is continuously injured and tapestry of diseases overwhelms your body. CANCER is NOT the point at all. All we care is QOL(Quality Of Life) for 20-30 years and GENERATIONS. This (The Internal Emitter damages all the DNA’s not only human, but trees, grasses, insects, birds, animals, fishes…EVERY LIFE and Environments. These are well clarified by the famous “Chernobyl” of NY Academy of Sciences, 2009 and the “cited 150,000 references” from Belarus, Chernobyl, Ukraine and all the European countries.)”Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment”

http://www.nyas.org/publications/annals/Detail.aspx?cid=f3f3bd16-51ba-4d7b-a086-753f44b3bfc1
20,000Bq in Body detected.

http://fukushima-diary.com/2012/08/20000-bqbody-from-a-man-in-fukushima/#.UB3znFE_P6Y.facebok
“

consumption by Kitagawa Takashi

—-

FRANCK REPORT 1945 -> Hiroshima and Nagasaki were avoidable: “Much more favorable conditions for the eventual achievement of such an agreement could be created if nuclear bombs were first revealed to the world by a demonstration in an appropriately selected uninhabited area.” signed by SEABORG (discovered Plutonium) SZILARD (conceived nuclear chain reaction)
http://www.fas.org/sgp/eprint/franck.html

The Reactor Chimney is the BIGGEST crack in every Contaiment.

I wish all living beings a good health,

Jan Hemmer

Read Full Post »

Citizen-Scientist International Symposium 放射線防護のための国際会議 June 23rd 2012

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

“Scientific and Medical Views on Health Effects of Exposure to Radiation“

FROM THE WEBSITE:
http://www.csrp.jp/?lang=en


“Marshalling of various scientific and medical views of importance concerning health effects of exposure to radiation. Discussion among scientists and citizens representing different views to identify points of agreement and issues to be studied in the future. Presentation of current understandings of the accident of the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant and basic data needed for full-scale investigation in the future. Study of the contents of health effects surveys, protective measures and aftercare that will be needed in the future.”

Among participants: Dr. Keith Baverstock (
http://www.chernobylcongress.org/speakers/artikel/2cc0de2cee21dc8506748b53a7d1e584/keith-baverstock.html
)

It can be seen as a successor to the Geneva Radiation Protection Forum:
http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/05/03/correction-of-history-forum-on-radioprotection-may-12-13-geneva/

This is my consumption:
http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/06/09/%E9%A3%9F%E3%81%B9%E7%89%A9%E3%81%8C%E6%9C%80%E3%82%82%E5%8D%B1%E9%99%BA%E3%81%AA%E6%94%BE%E5%B0%84%E8%83%BD%E6%BA%90%E3%81%A7%E3%81%99%E3%80%82-%E9%A3%9F%E3%81%B9%E7%89%A9%E3%81%AE%E7%B7%9A%E9%87%8F/

—

It could be a counterattack to the pseudo conference of IPPNW exactly 2 months later, @ Hiroshima: www.ippnw2012.org- which ignores Fukushima:

Japanese IPPNW members support the pro nuclear, anti human term “Radiophobia” (made by IAEA):

“The biggest problem is the fear of radiation and psychological stress. Stress itself,
and failure due to stress or alcohol” – QUOTE by japanese IPPNW:
http://www.hiroshima.med.or.jp/ippnw/sokuho/docs/2150_006.pdf

More:
http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/06/03/fukushima-medical-unversity-accelerating-children-death/

Read Full Post »

Children Radiation Maps

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

On April 5th I went to BELRAD Institute (
http://belrad-institute.org/
) in Belarus (got 72% of the Chernobyl fallout), with a friend and translator, to get important data about their work. Here I present with the permission of vice director Mr. Babenko of BELRAD, the Children radiation maps of Belarus (below). First, some background on the data: We see here 17 regions of Belarus:

Irradiated areas and relatively “CLEAN” areas. Children have Cesium in their bodies, no matter if they live in “clean” or irradiated areas.  This is one important fact these maps show. Why is that? The average irradiated soil in Belarus is: 1 – 40 Curie per square kilometer (= 37,000 – 1,480,000 becquerel per m²) of radionuclides,  such as Cesium 137, Strontium 90, Americium 241 and other radionuclides. It reaches also 160 Curie per km², although it is 40 on official maps, but reaches 18,500,000 becquerel per m² in some places. Here is more info: 
http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/03/04/japanese-children-cancer-outlook-children-need-absolutely-clean-food/
Here is a list of the radionuclides:
http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/Primary%20Radionuclides.gif

A brief introduction:

BELRAD ベラルーシ 市民の放射線計測協会 – May 12th 2012

The circles on the region graphic mostly show GREEN and YELLOW. Green means: Children have 0 – 20 Becquerel of Cesium 137 per body kilogram (2,20 pounds or 35,20 ounzes). Yellow means: Children have 20 – 100 Becquerel of Cesium 137 per body kilogram.

Download the Children Radiation Maps:
http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/MAPS.pdf

Download History of Belrad (from above):
http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/NesterenkoChernobyl-Belarus.pdf

WHAT ARE THE CONSEQUENCES?

1) How the Nuclear Industry first kills the Children and then the Parents

2) Prof. Gould explains How Radiation Kills Infants

FULL ENGLISH ARTICLE AND CHILDREN RADIATION MAPS (from
http://www.enfants-tchernobyl-belarus.org
)

Atlas_report_1
Atlas_report2-3stage
Atlas_report_3
Dobrush
Elsk
Vetka
Zhitkovichi

AND:

Report_7_8
Report_9_10
Report_11_12
Report_13_14
Report_15_16
Report_17_18
Report_19_20
Report_21_22
Report_23_24

Caesium 137, food, children, apple pectin:
http://radionucleide.free.fr/Stresseurs/smw-Galina_Bandazhevskaya.pdf

Nesterenko, founder of BELRAD: “Children receive the highest doses, because the dose coefficients, in a 3 year old child, are 5 times higher than in adults.“

But the Children Radiation Maps are based upon Whole Body Counter measurments of Children, measuring Cesium 137. They are the latest maps available by Belrad. More Info:
http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/03/02/mother-how-much-radiation-%E3%81%8A%E6%AF%8D%E3%81%95%E3%82%93%EF%BC%81%E3%81%A9%E3%81%AE%E3%81%8F%E3%82%89%E3%81%84%E3%81%AE%E6%94%BE%E5%B0%84%E7%B7%9A%EF%BC%9F-2/

Not even world’s biggest nuclear-reactor-children-cancer study (KIKK) counts in INTERNAL radiation:
http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2007/12/17/german-kikk-study-higher-cancer-risc-next-to-atomic-power-plants-unofficial-belarussian-children-cancer-data/
They only measure EXTERNAL radiation. No known children cancer study is interested in INTERNAL emitters, although 70 – 90% of radiation comes from food today. THE WORLD HAS TO LEARN FROM BELARUS. If the focus is set only to external radiation, is seen only radiation in water and air, only milli sievert is discussed.  Clean city, irradiated food. No children cancer study I know is interested in internal emitters. We can not afford this failure a 2nd time. This is not mere methodology. This is survival.

BELRAD INFO IN BELARUSIAN LANGFUAGE:

Cesium 137 mimics potassium and it did not exist before the atomic age. “cesium is easy to accumulate in the heart” / “50 Becquerel break your heart rhythm at 20 to 30 becquerel per kilogram of body weight” (CHILDREN!) / “if, during pregnancy, there is more than 200 becquerel per kilogram of cesium in the placenta it can lead to sudden death of the child” – according to Prof. Bandazhevsky from Belarus, now working in Ukraine and Japan:
http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/03/24/%E5%B0%82%E9%96%80%E5%AE%B6-%E3%83%A6%E3%83%BC%E3%83%AA%E3%83%BC%E3%83%BB%E3%83%90%E3%83%B3%E3%83%80%E3%82%B8%E3%82%A7%E3%83%95%E3%82%B9%E3%82%AD%E3%83%BC-%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC-belarusian-chernobyl-and-c/

It’s health / death consequences are usually ignored by IAEA, WHO, UNSCEAR, ICRP, BEIR, health ministeries and authorities, such as FDA. They even allow a certain (murderous) limit for food. In case of the European Union Countries: 63 milli Sievert per Year by Cesium 137 for infants:
http://www.strahlentelex.de/RadiationRisk_EU_042011_engl.pdf

Cesium 137 is build in into these (all) body organs: 
http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/children-cesium137.jpg

Food and their Mitosis is the reason, why children become ill and die, in irradiated AND “CLEAN” areas.

“In most cases effect of existing concentrations of radioactive caesium in the organism (10 – 20 Bq/kg) doesn’t cause its death, but influencing the energetic apparatus of cardiac cells significantly reduces their adaptable possibilities, and as a result functioning during stress situations and banal loads (physical and mental tension, hypoxia, disorder of temperature regime, alcohol drinking, infections and allergic diseases) becoming impossible.” 
http://chernobyl-today.org/images/stories/Bandajevski_2001_Radiocaesium_and_heart.pdf

BELRAD Whole Body Counter (Children and Cesium 137) summary:
http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/paper2%20V.Nesterenko.ppt
PowerPoint File

“we can rightly consider the Cesium-137 in relatively small doses (20-30 Bq/kg); a breach of the regulatory processes in the body”: PAGE 2 – 3:
http://chernobyl-today.org/images/stories/BANDAJEVSKI_UNSCEAR_-_REUTERS_Sept_22nd_2010_Eng_V2.pdf

BELARUS – 72 % of Chernobyl fallout – Belarusian Radiation Maps of the Country:
http://www.rbic.by/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=256&Itemid=86

“Incorporation by of radionuclides (137Cs and 90Sr) with food (meat and grain) affects the offspring prenatal and postnatal development manifested by embryotoxic effects and abnormal bony system develop­ment”
http://radionucleide.free.fr/Chapitre_1.htm

Scientists discover the obvious: “the human infant while nursing may attain higher body bur dens of radiocesium than would be the case for somewhat older children.”:
http://radionucleide.free.fr/Stresseurs/419.pdf

Rough and inaccurate radiation maps of BELARUS (Am241, Cs137, Sr90, Pu239 & 240), in Curie per km²:
http://chornobyl.in.ua/karta-belorussii.html

and RUSSIA: 
http://chornobyl.in.ua/karty-zagriaznenia-rossii.html
and UKRAINE:
http://chornobyl.in.ua/karta-radionulid-ukraine.html

Charity rock concert for BELRAD Institute in Belarus (radiation measurements of food and Children / Chernobyl) on April 28th 2012:
http://www.janun-hannover.de/
– 7 EUR Invitation – proceeds go to BELRAD. More Info:
http://www.ostwestbruecke.de/
(Annual operating costs of a radiation measuring site is 1,238 € – according to Nesterenko.)

Here is Mr. Babenko of BELRAD, speaking in Japan:

Here are the Cesium 137 maps for Japan:
http://orangeorange.jp/archives/18933
and Soil / Becquerel:
http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/bqsoil-fukushimajapan.jpg

Vassily Nesterenko (liquidator and nuclear physicist) is the founder of Belrad Institute. And he says: that 70 – 90 % of RADIATION is accumulated with the consumption of FOOD. Mask can not protect against this main threat. This is the fact, and was the fact 10 years after the Explosions in Chernobyl. Although 130,000 people were evacuated from the most contaminated area. This is the reason why children are ill or become ill in “CLEAN” areas. Nesterenko and this son did this Study:
http://www.strahlentelex.de/Yablokov%20Chernobyl%20book.pdf
He also says, that a 30-km evac zone is pointless. A 200 km evacuation zone makes more sense (Chernobyl). Babies with 2,6 Bq/body kg. Cesium 137:
http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/low-doses-are-high-doses_Ch.jpg
Much more vulnerable than adults. Compare human fetus: In 1970 it was proven that human fetus is 500 times more vulnerable to radiation. And in 1978 this was released in the bulletin of atomic scientists:
http://books.google.de/books?id=aAoAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA30&lpg=PA30&dq=cancer+stewart+xray+1970+radiographs&source=bl&ots=UGZYt0TZGo&sig=ENE9wYZjjNs3Rh2XyptdZwP3Ucw&hl=de&ei=7545Tu6iF8aAOsLrvbMG&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&sqi=2&ved=0CBsQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false

Radiation-Inducible Chromosome Injuries:
Some Recent Evidence on Health Consequences — Major Consequences:
http://ratical.org/radiation/CNR/RICI.html#Part1

WHY Fukushima and Chernobyl grow in Time and Space: “The yield of chromosome aberrations and, in lesser degree, embryonic lethality was associated with the radionuclide contamination of the monitoring areas in a dose-dependent manner. As a main feature of the long-term development of biological damage under low dose rate irradiation, permanently elevated levels of chromosome aberrations and an increasing frequency of embryonic lethality have developed over 22 animal generations. This contrasts with the assumption that the biological damage would gradually disappear since in the same period of time the whole-body absorbed dose rate decreased exponentially with a half-value time of about 2.5–3 years.”
http://enfants-tchernobyl-belarus.org/lib/exe/fetch.php?media=fichiers%3Aetb-68.pdf

Pathologies of organs and systems of children are being registered when accumulation of Cs-137 in the body is higher than 50 Bq/kg. During pregnancy, when the level of Cs-137 in placenta is >200 Bq/kg, hormone disorders are being registered not only with mother but with foetus too. Particularly the level of testosterone increases with the higher amount of radionuclides. Mother experiences the increase of thyroid hormones amount and the amount of kortisol in blood. Changes of hormonal status in the mother-foetus system leads to the increase of the pregnancy length, complications of the birth act and after-birth development of the child.
http://members.fortunecity.com/asasas25/Nester/nester1.htm

“Anencephaly, severe spina bifida cystica, cleft lips and/or palate, polydactyly, reduction limb defects leading to disability, esophageal atresia, anorectal atresias, Down’s syndrome and multiple
malformations are registered both in stillborns and in fetuses obtained through induced abortion after prenatal diagnostics. The results are presented in Table 2 for the 137Cs contaminated areas and for the control.” quote and scan from PAGE 2:
http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Lazjuk.pdf

Non-cancerous disease in various regions of Belarus contaminated by the Chernobyl accident radioactive material チェルノブイリ事故による放射性物質で汚染されたベラルーシの諸地域における非ガン性疾患 / ECCR
http://www.crms-jpn.com/doc/%E3%83%81%E3%82%A7%E3%83%AB%E3%83%8E%E3%83%96%E3%82%A4%E3%83%AA%E4%BA%8B%E6%95%85%E3%81%AB%E3%82%88%E3%82%8B%E6%94%BE%E5%B0%84%E6%80%A7%E7%89%A9%E8%B3%AA%E3%81%A7%E6%B1%9A%E6%9F%93%E3%81%95%E3%82%8C%E3%81%9F%E3%83%99%E3%83%A9%E3%83%AB%E3%83%BC%E3%82%B7%E3%81%AE%E8%AB%B8%E5%9C%B0%E5%9F%9F%E3%81%AB%E3%81%8A%E3%81%91%E3%82%8B%E9%9D%9E%E3%82%AC%E3%83%B3%E6%80%A7%E7%96%BE%E6%82%A3%E3%80%80%EF%BC%B9%E3%83%BB%E3%83%90%E3%83%B3%E3%83%80%E3%82%B7%E3%82%A7%E3%83%95%E3%82%B9%E3%82%AD%E3%83%BC%E6%95%99%E6%8E%88.pdf

“Two years ago, Rosa Goncharova of the Institute of Genetics and Cytology in Minsk reported evidence that congenital abnormalities were turning up in the children of those irradiated by Chernobyl. She told a conference that since 1985, cases of cleft palate, Down’s syndrome and other deformities had increased by 83 per cent in the areas most heavily contaminated, 30 per cent in moderately contaminated areas and 24 per cent in “clean” areas.”
http://web.archive.org/web/20060108123540/http://www.unesco.org/courier/2000_10/uk/planet.htm

Nesterenko (BELRAD), Jablokov (Moscow), Busby (CERRIE), Tchertkoff (Switzerland), Bruno Chareyron (CRIIRAD):

or:

Doses recived by Children are 3 – 10 times higher than by adults. This is a catastrophe because Children are in “mitsosis“, every damaged cell gives the damage to other cells, more rapidly. The latency is shorter in Children (1 – 4 years / adults: 20 – 25 years). By Vassily Nesterenko Atomic phsyicist and liquidator of Chernobyl and founder of BELRAD Institute:

“for 15 years new children were born who, thanks to God, did not experience the first radioactive shock. For 15 years, they have eaten contaminated food. Children receive the highest doses, because the dose coefficients, in a 3 year old child, are 5 times higher than in adults. Contaminate food spreads like locusts In the whole Republic. It is not surprising to find in Minsk, children with a dose load of 700-900 Bq/kg. I want to draw your attention on the research of Prof. Bandazhevsky. We worked with him. He came to the conclusion that 50 Bq/kg bodyweight in children, represent a threshold where pathologies appear in vital organs like kidneys, liver, heart and others. I want to say that today the health of children is such that if we do not take urgent measures, I cannot see good prospects for our children.”

Nesterenko: “We measure the whole population, then we isolate the critical group. We isolate the 10-15 most contaminated individuals. Generally 8 are children, also tractor drivers and forest workers, and sometimes retired persons who gather great quantities of berries and mushroom in forests. This is what our measurements show. We have 110.000 results. We always thought that children with a high metabolism should not concentrate much. But, I repeat, we find the highest concentrations in the children.”

“when we try to eliminate the high sickness rate by an increased number of clinics – we’ll never succeed. Unfortunately, we are losing time for study because to do something it is necessary to understand the reasons and consequences of the sickness rather than regularly declare slogans or launch some campaigns”
http://spring96.org/en/news/13547

Irradiated Fukushima or Chernobyl Soil with 555,000 Becquerel per m² (15 Curie per km²) and more irradiates the people living there with additional 50 to 60 milli Sievert per year (annual dose)! NOT included: Irradiation by food (Source number One).

The ICRP lowered the standard dose for citizens in 1991 from 5 mSv/annual to 1 mSv/annual. For workers of the nuclear industry they lowered it from 50 mSv/annual to 20 mSv/annual. In 2011 the japanese government increased it by 2000 PERCENT into: 20 mSv/annual. AN INFANT or UNBORN is “allowed” to get as much radiation per YEAR as a worker in a nuclear power plant! This is “only” external radiation. 
http://hps.org/documents/publicdose03.pdf
/
http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/02/17/japanese-infants-as-much-radiation-as-nuclear-power-plant-employees/

presentation of Rosa Goncharova: Genomic Instability After Chernobyl, Prognosis for the Coming Generations:
http://vivretchernobyl.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/presentation-of-rosa-goncharova-genomic-instability-after-chernobyl-prognosis-for-the-coming-generations/

Our tolerance level to radiation is lowered by Chernobyl and Fukushima: it can be stated that hereditary apparatus of somatic and germ cells of succeeding animal generations (12-22) have higher sensitivity to radiation in comparison with previous ones (1-10) that lived before – and took much higher radiation loads. In other words, there was no genetic adaptation to the mutagenic effect of low level irradiation for the whole investigation period in wild populations of bank vole.
http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Goncharova.pdf

Low Radiation: The Petkau Effect – updated Aug 1st 2011:
http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/03/14/low-radiation-the-petkau-effect/

Lessons from Belarus to Japan: 555 kBq per m² (15 Curie per km²) to 1,480 kBq per m² (40 Curie per km²) cause 50 – 60 milli Sievert per year for the people living there – according to Belaraus National Report 1995 [the year when Belarus stopped aid for irradiated areas with 1 - 5 Curie km² (37 kBq per m² - 185 kBq per m²)]. Exclusion Zones start at 18,500 kBq (18,500,000!!!) per m² of Cs-137, 455 kBq per m² of Sr-90 and 150 kBq per m² of Pu-239. Very very high tolerance levels, if we take into account, that Bandashevsy proved, that 20 Bq – 50 Bq of Cs-137 per Kg of the body (not kilo Bq! normal Bq!) are already letal for children! 1995: the level of air contamination exceeded by 10 and more times the pre-accident data even for “clean” places, like Minsk.

The river sediments of Dneeper, Sozh and Pripjat, Neman, Zapadnay and Divina increased Cs-137 by 80%. This is only official state data. It reached also backwaters: The Sr-90 activity varies from 2,2 – 66,0 up to 407 – 4,215 Bq/Kg). Alpha-radionuclides density in riverbed sediments is higher than in river waters: Pu238 from 0,005 – 9,10 Bg/Kg; Pu-239-240 from 0,13 – 28,13 Bq/Kg; Am-241 from 0,07 – 16,2 Bq/Kg. In the 90ies the levels fro Cs-137 and Sr-90 exceed pre-accidental levels in ground water 20 – 30 times and in underground waters 10 times and more. Chernobyl turned the soil into a collector where accumulation and prolonged retention of long-living radionculides occur.

Today contaminated soil functions as the main source, which delivers various components of radionuclides into the biosphere. At at distance of 150 – 200 km to Chernobyl: Gomel in Belarus: 2,271 kBq/m² (61 Curie per km²) and Mogilev (146 Curie per km²) can be found. In Bragin (Gomel) Cs-137 contamination is 174 kBq per m² up to 2,523 kBq per m². Radionuclides are distributed into forest photosynthesis: this is the growth line for Cs-137: wood < branches < needles < forest litter. For the living soil cover the line is as follows: herbaceous plants < lichens < mosses. The maximum is in the root system and ground vegetative part of plants, and considerably lower in generating organs. Accumulation degree for Sr-90 in meadow plants is twice as large as compared to Cs-137. The permissible levels for mushrooms is 7,4 kBq per m² for mushrooms. Terretories are called clean if contamination density is lower than 37 kBq per m². For berries of the red worthle berries family varies from 37 to 185 kBq per m². Migration processes of marketable animals and birds cause high specific activity of game registered even on relatively clean terretories.

The presence of radioactive isotopes in practically all components of the natural and natural-techno-genic ecosystems with density much higher than before explains their involvement in the geo-chemical and biological cycles of migration. This stuation causes different ways of external and internal irradiation of the population and jeopardizes people’s health.

We don’t get more data today, it is covered up by the state. So we go back into the 90ies: Thyroid illnesses morbidity of the children of Gomel area in 1994 (indices per 100,000 children: Total in Belarus 1086,20 – Total in Gomel area: 3594,30 – Contaminated area (> 555 kBq per m² / > 15 Curie per km²): 16159,70. Thyroid cancer morbidity of the children of Gomel area in 1994 (i.p. 100,000 children): Total in Belarus: 3,20 – Total in Gomel area: 12,00 – Contaminated area (> 555 kBq per m² / > 15 Curie per km²): 77,50. Tumour morbidity of the children in Gomel area in 1994 (i.p. 100,000 chidren): Total in Belarus: 101,10 – Total in Gomel area: 154,90 – Contaminated area (> 555 kBq per m² / > 15 Curie per km²): 245,40. Malignant tumour morbidity of the Children of Gomel area in 1994: Total in Belarus: 13,80 – Total in Gomel area: 27,10 – Contaminated area (> 555 kBq per m² / > 15 Curie per km²): 103,30.

Impact on human health in Belarus:
http://tschernobyl-initiative.welcomes-you.com/dokumente/belarus/pdf/band3_s8_23.pdf

Official radiation maps of Belarus (too low):
http://www.rbic.by/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=256&Itemid=86

How Belarus makes Chernobyl zones attractive, which are irradiated with 40 Curie per km² (1,480,000 Becquerel per m² – gives 50 – 60 mSv/year only by living there):
http://www.kostukovichi.mogilev-region.by/en/news/region

BELRAD (THE INSTITUTE OF RADIATION, BELARUS)
“The Institute of Radiation Safety in Belarus is known as BELRAD (or Institute
BELRAD). The Institute was founded by the eminent nuclear physicist Dr Vasily
Nesterenko in 1990 and acts as an independent non state organization. The
Institute conducts scientific research and development projects to measure the
radiation in food and humans, along with measurements of contamination in soil
The goal of the Institute BELRAD is the radiation monitoring of the inhabitants of
Chernobyl zone and their food. The Institute also develops guidelines on
radiation safety for the protection of the population who live in the contaminated
zones. BELRAD also conducts ongoing scientific research.
FROM
http://www.chernobyl-international.com/Libraries/Documents/Chernobyl25_-_Impact_of_Chernobyl_-_Facts_Figures.sflb.ashx

Main activities:

Radiation monitoring of the Chernobyl zones

The creation local networks for controlling and limiting the distribution of
contaminated food

Educating teachers and schools on the dangers of consuming irradiated food

Radiation monitoring of food. There are now 83 local networks in operation
and these networks or centres assist in monitoring food. The BELRAD databank
includes over 320,000 results relating to their radiation control and monitoring of
food in the worst affected regions of Belarus.”

Speak out the truth, do the self-evident!

In the name of the Children.

Jan Hemmer

Read Full Post »