Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘IAEA’

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

tepco-holocaust

Dr. Keith Baverstock Fukushima: the roles of WHO and IAEA

6th post about the Chernobyl Fukushima Symposium with REAL independent experts, from March 4th – 7th 2014, Germany:

Documentation: http://www.chernobylcongress.org/documentation-arnoldshain.html

more about him: http://www.kbaverstock.org

Program: http://www.chernobylcongress.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/2014-03-03_Atom_Programm.pdf

This is the cancerous structure & influence of the NUCLEAR INDUSTRY inside of the UNITED NATIONS:

UN-cancer

2012 IAEA annual budget:  € 331 million – enough to buy the United Nations.

How the UN works: “know thine enemy” or at least who it is:

“By mid 1998 first draft of the Guidelines was circulating between IAEA and WHO at the management level.

“Although there had been a clear agreement between the two organisations at
the management level and the work had taken place openly the IAEA withdrew
at that stage strongly advising that the whole issue should either be dropped or
revised. The issue was the proposal to lower the action level for implementation
from 100mGy to 10mGy dose to the thyroid’s of children.”

“Managerial level of IAEA refuses to endorse the report and refuses to endorse the report but WHO publishes Guidelines in 1999 but IAEA describes them as “DRAFT” and WHO Geneva agrees”

SOURCE: Dr. Keith Baverstock

http://www.chernobylcongress.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/Baverstock_How_the_UN_works.pdf

it is recognized by the World Health Organization that the International Atomic Energy Agency has the primary responsibility for encouraging, assisting and coordinating research and development and practical application of atomic energy for peaceful uses throughout the world without prejudice to the right of the World Health Organization to concern itself with promoting, developing, assisting and coordinating international health work, including research, in all its aspects.http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/Others/inf20.shtml#note_c

This is the reason why UN sees no rise in cancer due to Fukushima: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/31/us-japan-fukushima-un-idUSBRE94U0KR20130531

VERSUS:

Radiation Is Always Dangerous, Says World Health Organization Director-General:  http://concernforhealth.org/radiation-is-always-dangerous-says-world-health-organization-director-general/

Contract between IAEA and Fukushima Medical University (“Dr” Yamashita)
“…the IAEA will endeavour to organize conferences, seminars and workshops, in cooperation with the University, with the aim of enhancing public awareness of radiological effects on human health and addressing the issue of “radiation fear” and post-traumatic stress disorders in the Fukushima population…” http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/energy/fukushima_2012/pdfs/fukushima_iaea_en_06.pdf

baverstock

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

Click on every photo & scan you can see here.

future-is-on-fire4

cherno-shelter

Chernobyl needs no sarcophagus, not today and not in 1986, because it was and is EMPTY. The establishment of a sarcophagus was crazy, senseless and deadly – But right now, they build the 2nd one. A new Containment for a dangerous truth.

The liquidators have not liquidated Chernobyl. The liquidators have liquidated themselves.

800,000 worked in the area. On site, as doctors, workers… but they worked in the Chernobyl Core – which was was scattered everywhere. In microparticles. This means: Soviet officials evacuated 130,000 civilans, but sent 800,000 into the irradiated areas!

The Reactor became empty, when the second explosion happened.

A nuclear one. What? Not possible? Sadly, it is. And it is known since the first reactor was build. A moderator / water is vital for each reactor, because it can become nuclear explosive.

vzryv_na_chetvertom_bloke 6337147eb183a58d885705bdd44_prev 970449913  29438

The CORE data:

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion42 (2)chernobyl-nuclear-explosion42

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion31

Chernobyl irradiated the whole European Continent – even pro nuclear UNSCEAR clearly admits that (although their numbers are from the textbook):

unscear-chernobyl

http://www.unscear.org/docs/JfigXI.pdf

882275_431284120293557_1499725210_o

belarus-cloud-plane

To understand the principle of the nuclear explosion of the reactor, and unmask probably the biggest lie in technological history of human history, just have a look at this:

- Chernobyl was a nuclear explosion

- No containment can keep such a explosion

- The weight of the reactor lid was 2,000 tons (NOT 1,000!) – important for energy calculation later below

- A containment would increase the yield of the explosion (pressure!)

- This principle is as old as the principle of man made nuclear fission:

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion15 chernobyl-nuclear-explosion16 chernobyl-nuclear-explosion17 chernobyl-nuclear-explosion18 chernobyl-nuclear-explosion19

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion04

the above scan is from: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2013/03/28/chernobyl-the-accident-and-its-implications-for-other-nuclear-reactors/

From the book “History of the British nuclear industry” by Margaret Gowing, “Britain and Atomic Energy”, on page 382 the former  U.S. water-cooled graphite reactor at Hanford is described: “To be built in view of the risks of an accident, the reactor is at an isolated location. Because water absorbs neutrons, and when the water flow is interrupted and the control rods do not occur immediately in action, the water evaporates in the cooling system and can no longer absorb the neutrons . These neutrons were therefore available to increase the fission rate in the reactor, which is super critical with power. The temperature rises, the fuel evaporated and the radioactivity is spreading widely. “

On page 385 we find the position:
“The gas cooling is to avoid the risk of severe supercritical state …”

What is supercritical?

The knowledge of the danger of an atomic explosion that can occur in a water-cooled graphite-gas reactor, is as old as the principle of the reactor itself.

Safety Assessment Principle 152 requires ‘The containment should adequately contain such radioactive matter as may be released into it as a result of any fault in the reactor.’ Clearly if nuclear explosions are possible a licence should not be granted. LAST PAGE: http://www.spokesmanbooks.com/Spokesman/PDF/91Gifford.pdf

safety-cherno-nuclear

Chernobyl was build by ROSATOM – the ones who build a new reactor in Chernobyl irradiated Belarus, the ones who helped Iran with their nuclear reactors. Chernobyl went critical 1st time 1984, 2 years before the explosions:

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion12

So, what happened at Chernobyl Reactor 4? First a small and short summary. Then a BIG one further below. Are you with me?

1) A very good summary with exact Energy Yields was made by: “Martinez Val, Jose M., Aragones, Jose M., Mingues, Emilio, Perlado, Jose M., Velarade, Guillermio. An Analysis of the Physical Causes of the Chernobyl Accident. Nuclear Technology. Vol. 90, June 1990: http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/Artikel%20zu%20Tschernobyl%20in%20Nuclear%20Technology%20Vol%2090.pdf (this is the worldwide only exclusive link providing this file). Chernobyl’s 190,3 tons Core consisted of 450 Kg Plutonium 239.

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion05

This is also something the nuclear advocats don’t want you to know: 250 Kg Plutonium 239 are produced by each reactor. This is why they were invented: For Plutonium, NOT electricity. Chernobyl was primarily a military reactor. You could extract the Plutonium while the reactor was running. Because of the two halves of the Core. So there is much potential for supercriticality. EVERY reactor needs critical ingredients to “start” – it is in the BOL fuel, the “Beginning Of Life” Fuel. It starts with it. Chernobyl even with more. Give it a face: Nagasaki was “only” 6,2 Kg Plutonium. While every reactor has 250 Kg of it! Now, credit that!

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion28

2) In Chernobyl there were TWO Explosions. Number One set the reactor dry – with 200 Gigajoules Energy (0,2 Terrajoule), and then Core poisoned itself and heated it up 100°C every 0,1 seconds. The 2nd explosion reached 1,000 Gigajoules (1,0 Terrajoule) and led to destruction / phase transition of the fuel:

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion06

Other sources say: H. van Dam. says: “900 Gigajoules”: http://iopscience.iop.org/0034-4885/55/11/003 still a good “housenumber”.

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion09

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion10

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion20

NRC official: http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML0716/ML071690245.pdf 

3) The Temperature reached more than 2,000°C degrees – reaching 47,000 % POWER!

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion01

4) Reaching 4,000 – 5,000°C these temperatures were no longer chemical, they were nuclear. Officials tell us: “Chernobyl was a hydrogen / steam explosion” – maybe the first one. But with the heating up, it became too hot for these kind of explosions. Don Arnot (below) said: At these temperatures steam ionizes and dissociates into the gases oxygen and hydrogen. These detonating gases do not explode above 2,000 / 2,100 °C.

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion29

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion13

Source: http://books.google.de/books?id=QGlMb5wXs5sC&pg=PA174#v=onepage&q=arnott&f=false

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion14

http://books.google.de/books?id=oEqd0IeAhccC&pg=PA6&hl=de&source=gbs_selected_pages&cad=3#v=snippet&q=4000&f=false

Often officials as former soviet Agencies, IAEA, NRC, UNSCEAR, tell the lie of a “hydrogen” or “steam” explosion. That is a lie. It comes from the textbook. Because otherwise reactors would get no licence to be built. They have to keep their inventory inside at all cost. The nuclear textbook is a template and experts push reality through it. The Officials lie about the temperature, or the weight of the reactor lid, or any other data, at least one of them. To downplay the nature of the explosion. But the reactor hall is no more. A fact. Plus the 2,000 tons reactor lid.

50 million Chernobyl curies? IAEA? “The pro-nuclear Time magazine reported in 1989 that perhaps “one billion or more” curies were released, rather than the 50 to 80 million estimated by Russian authorities.” Source: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/Chernobyl/Chernobyl@10p2.html

All radiation maps, doses, emissions are from the text book – not from reality. 50 million curie are: 1,850,000,000,000,000,000 Becquerel (1.85e+18) released by CHERNOBYL. A lie!

There is nearly NOTHING left in the Chernobyl 4 reactor! This is proven! 

Argonne National Laboratory in Illinois: 9 Billion Curie

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California: 4,5 Billion Curie

Source: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb6393/is_n3_v12/ai_n28692892/

1,85 1,85 1,85 1,85 1,85 1,85… Just remember this number ONE point EIGHT FIVE and the 50

let’s look at the Boiling Water Manual from GE, also for Fukushima:

page 73: CLICK!

page 76: CLICK!

Every reactor releases 50 micro curie of radioactive gases: which is 1,850,000 becquerel PER SECOND!

There is the 50 and the 1,85 again!

It’s all from the textbook!

It’s not the reality!

Can you control atoms?

>>>> A normal reactor releases 1,850,000 becquerel per second. Multiply it with x 10 = 18,500,000 becquerel – these are also the offical MAXIMUM LEVELS of radionuclide activity in the exclusion Chernobyl zone in Belarus (from the 1995 Belarus NATIONAL Report):

Again the 1,85 !

daily dose at a 1000 Curie per km² area, for example near Chernobyl reactor 4 with 37 mio becquerel per m² (map) is something like 10 mSv PER DAY – while normal is 1 – 2 mSv per year.

They press reality into their simulation models. Especially Chernobyl. The 50 Mio Curie are used to conceal the fact, that ALL Inventory was thrown out in 1986, thats more than 5 billion curie, not 50 million. But they use the textbook to conceal it, in order to prove that even during an explosion a reactor safe. And now these madmen build a 2nd sarcophagus around and EMPTY reactor, to even underline the 28 years old lie!

nucler-mental

a) A steam explosion can not develop 1,2 Terrajoule. Steam explosion’s Maxium -> 50 Gigajoules. But the explosion lifted the 2,000 tons lid away, and then even destroyed the reactor hall! How powerful is that. Only a maximum of 10 to 50 Gigajoule of Energy are possible by a Steam explosion in Chernobyl – it was the water expelled from Reactor 4:

no-hydrogen

Source: http://books.google.de/books?id=vgwAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA65#v=onepage&q&f=false

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion08

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion11

NRC confirmed the terrajoule data:

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion03

NRC: http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML0716/ML071690245.pdf 

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion02

Yes: 1,400 Cal/gm (calories per gram) are 1,1 Terrajoules = equivalent of 0,2 – 0,3 Kilotons TNT.

There was not enough water, power in water, to create so a high energy explosion, for the 2nd one. This was nuclear.

W54 nuclear warhead is the energy yield equivalent of Chernobyl explosion (0,2 – 0,3 KT TNT):

We are fooled by IAEA and soviet agencies since 1986!

b) What you see here in this video is NOT the fuel melting, because it was thrown completely out by a force of 1,2 terrajule (0,2 – 0,3 KT TNT)  and it is NOT graphite fire, there was none according to a heat photo scanner Checherov used shortly after the explosions. What you see  is the 2,000 tons reactor lid, that was thrown aside and is GLOWING because of HEAT, it was so hot, that it turned from Red (770 – 800°C) into Yellow (1150 – 1250°C). The helicopter crew did not survive. Interivew with above Infos: Constantine Checherov – Senior Researcher of the Kurchatov Institute – one of the first people who visited the reactor hall after the explosion. He does not believe that the explosion of Chernobyl in ’86 exploded was hydrogen. It was a nuclear
explosion scattered hundreds of tons of radioactive fuel around the station: http://www.novayagazeta.ru/society/6095.html

chernobyl-nuke

Info from Interview with Checherov: http://www.novayagazeta.ru/society/6095.html

The fuel can become vaporized:

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion21

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion22 chernobyl-nuclear-explosion23 chernobyl-nuclear-explosion24

Vladimir M. Chernousenko, Scientific Director of the Ukrainian Academy of Sciences  Institute of Physics in Kiev’s Task Force for the  Rectification of the Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident- HE SAID:

“Radiation emission was no less that 80% of the core (with a total of 192 tons), which amounted to 6.4 x 10^9 Ci (Ci = Curie = 37,000,000,000 becquerel) If we divide the figure by the population of the whole earth (4.6 x 10^9 people) then we get 1 Ci per person.”

http://www.ratical.org/radiation/Chernobyl/ChernobylIftI.html

 

Footage from the inside of Reactor 4:

Chernobyl-kochelev

Prof. Pflugbeil (Germany): “Checherow and I went inside the destroyed reactor in Unit IV, as he is there crowled everywhere, even on the bottom of the reactor – accompanied by a small film crew.” – “I want now speak about the second Sarcophagus, because it does not serve to disguise a dangerous ruin, but for the concealment of dangerous lies. Since there are a lot of inconsistencies. Worldwide, for example, the version that 95 percent of the nuclear fuel still in there – is accepted, and that it would pose a threat for Ukraine and for the whole of Western Europe. Checherov has refuted this claim and he clearly says less than 10 percent are still in there. He was commissioned in 2001 by the Kurchatov Institute, to do a research report related to the second Sarcophagus. He has investigated room by room, measured, photographed, take core samples and has made his research report. He got a high distinction for it and the report ended up in a drawer forever! It interferes with the business.” Source: http://www.taz.de/!82695/

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion43

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion25chernobyl-nuclear-explosion26

“And that he (Checherov) has worked in the the lower part of the reactor for five hours. He said there were only is 10 tons. Otherwise they would have been so dead as a doornail. When we were in there, that was an uneasy feeling for me. The sound of the instruments, no light, you had to watch where you step and climb and you never knew whether or not chunk falls down from above. There are a thousand different rooms accessible in these ruins, heavily damaged. At the bottom of the reactor pot: We climbed over it broken things. At some areas there were even these elephants ‘feet’ of  molten material. Checherov has shown us all.” – “In the reactor pot was nothing. It was all thrown out with tremendous force into a short and violent explosion, which was so strong that it has lifted the 2,000-ton concrete lid. So the energy source is nuclear energy, clearly and the explosion was a nuclear explosion! The Western world – where  nuclear power plants and nuclear weapons are completely different – wants to ignore it, because otherwise it would clarify that a nuclear power plant can destroy itself with a nuclear explosion. But in the textbook, is written that a nuclear power plant can not. But it can.”

WWWsouzchernobylORG

AN Kiselev, Chernobyl, 1986, block 3: “Power of gamma radiation from a channel, lying on the roof of the third block measured by Zherdev was 2 Sievert per Hour (the limit of the measuring range of the instrument DP-5V ) at a distance of three meters” / “we had to work in an environment where radiation levels could exceed the 10 Sievert per Hour and even higher” / “As soon as the rotary drill bit to the fuel clusters, fuel chips along with the water got into the room , and immediately dramatically increased gamma-ray background” / “Biological protection of the camera has been redesigned in accordance with the requirements of radiation safety.” / “On the tube sites were about 15-20 tons of fuel. On the roof lay the whole fuel assemblies. Approximate weight of 300-350 kg each. The rate per person was calculated by removing 50 kg of graphite or 10-15 kg pieces of fuel rod.” / “the total amount of fuel in the lava-like clusters is within 20 % of the entire nuclear fuel that the reactor had at the time of the accident.”

Chernobyl4

“Checherov analyzed all the reports and minutes of the Integrated expedition with measurements and calculations. The analysis estimated the amount of fuel made on the basis of thermal measurements showed that this estimate was based on assumptions that do not reflect the real picture of the thermal situation in unit 4, and secondly, were based on experiments that are not based on reliable measurements, and voluntarist declarations of expenditure thermal parameters experimentally recorded variations of which varies in the range of up to two orders of magnitude.” / “The maximum thickness of the fuel accumulation , measured on the spot and recorded on the film is 0.5 meters , and if you increase the thickness of the layer 8 times, then this cluster should have a thickness of 4 meters.” / “At the time of the accident in the reactor core were 1,659 fuel channels withg 190,257 kilograms of uranium or its kg dioxide (UO2).”

“where, how much and in what state the nuclear fuel ?” / “Our reports of fuel found in the Unit 4 was several times smaller, but the debate as to why such differences exist and where the truth is – was not gebated in this symposium” / “regardless of the fact that the reactor vault is empty and you can not see this amount of fuel and the amount of such fuel just could not fit in the observed areas, those who were there and personally saw it with their own eyes the empty space – you can not convince the others that there are not huge amount of fuel as declared by those who have not been there ” / ” it turns out that the minimum found fuel is 53 % of the fuel, and if we accept the second version, you still have to find the 91%!http://www.souzchernobyl.org/?section=31&id=563

img_4ee5bbb6f2103

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion30

“Valery A. Legasov” – who was the first russian official who spoke about Chernobyl to the IAEA in 1986, and committed suicide. Before his death he made an audiotape, with untold facts about the Chernobyl explosion. Here are the abstracts of his tapes: “About the accident at Chernobyl” by Academician VA Legasov (text from the 4 cassettes) – in russian: http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/Legasov_V._Ob_Avarii_Na_Chernobiylsk.pdf

His 5 hours long speech at the IAEA 1996 meeting about Chernobyl was ignored: http://books.google.de/books?id=S-SsDtZG5WgC&pg=PA51&dq=new+scientist+valery+legasov&hl=de&ei=Lx_MTuu-BMaEOqb9uKYP&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CDMQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false

He knew about the insanity of sending liquidators to Chernobyl – he could not convince the IAEA and soviet officials. And decades later, Checherov – also from the same institute, indrectly supported the Legasov.

The now many times quotes Checherov (above) wrote this study. It is not simply a theory. HE WAS THERE, many times, WHERE – according to the IAEA, the Fuel should be. But it is not!

“Two different models of the nuclear explosions are known. According to, the core of the Chernobyl reactor transformed to a turbo-jet solid-phase engine after a very short initial overheating of fuel. It flied like a missile from the reactor vault to the central reactor hall by the hydrodynamic forces of gas-phase streams flushing down from the fuel channels. Then it exploded as an atomic bomb in the spaceof the central hall.” source: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr79/kr79pdf/Malko1.pdf

THE FULL STUDY – reads like a thriller! BELOW:

chernobyl-nuclear-explosion33 chernobyl-nuclear-explosion34 chernobyl-nuclear-explosion34b chernobyl-nuclear-explosion35 chernobyl-nuclear-explosion36 chernobyl-nuclear-explosion37 chernobyl-nuclear-explosion38 chernobyl-nuclear-explosion39 chernobyl-nuclear-explosion40 chernobyl-nuclear-explosion41

Chernobyl became even an inspiration for weapons:

RAM-Cherno

Dear fellow people.

The above-described principle is part of nuclear fission reactors. Whether now, or in the course of the life of a reactor.
Is as old as the man-made nuclear fission itself.

It is a principle that we have overlooked. Have overlooked the major areas of science. What the military-industrial complex is silent about, which is not explained the operation staff of nuclear facilities, which is in no Textbook.

With a containment a core will be boiled and blown out / vented, to avoid explosion.

Without containment, the lid makes the safety valve, but there is an explosion.

The inventory can not be kept.

The decay times are longer than any material.

“10 milli gray create 2 point mutations among 1,000 gametes. These are one seventieth ofl the natural mutation rate. If you take all chromosome mutations 10 milli gray produce one-tenth of the total mutation rate. If each year the maximum allowable dose is reached (5 mSv) the genetic mutation rate is increased in 30 years (one generation) by a fifth.” Prof. Dr. Hedy fritz-niggli, Switzerland. The International Commission on Radiological Protection ICRP believes 100 becquerels in one day are the same as a hundred days each day 1 Becquerel. Mathematically correct. Biologically completely wrong.

Herman J Mueller discovered in 1927 the following: ARTIFICIAL TRANSMUTATION OF THE GENE by radiation (Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1946) same story proven by Fukushima’s butterflies, remember? There was the Geneva Summit 1955, about the “peaceful” use of nuclear energy. Mueller wanted to present his report in which he had calculated that people in 200 to 300 years – by the current radiation – will have genetic damage as the most affected survivors of Hiroshima. These people, in 10 generations, would have to work only for one thing: To obtain the means to take care of their suffering. This is what Mueller wanted to tell, BUT the AEC (Predecessor of the NRC) gave him no talk permission. I mean: We experience this NOW! Cancer thins the rows around us (malignancy by genomic instability, by radiation). And the cancer drugs are the most expensive out there. More and more people accept euthanasia. We are eradicated, and then we are obedient till death! And then we twist the truth also: More cases because of better diagnostics!
We are getting older? Yes, if we look at the people who were born BEFORE the atomic age. Check it out the ones born TODAY! In what kind of dream world we live in! http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/08/17/fukushimas-butterflies-known-since-1927/ and http://books.google.de/books?id=ihDdAWPakwgC&pg=PA155&#v=onepage&q&f=false

And this principle, as well as the denial and ignoring the same
Will Set The Future
On fire.

damage-time

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

The Invisible blurs the causality.
The Symptom dresses up as Cause.

fear-rad

Protection against Fear, not against Radiation!

quote from the latest nuclear gag contract:
Contract between IAEA and Fukushima Medical University (“Dr” Yamashita)
“…the IAEA will endeavour to organize conferences, seminars and workshops, in cooperation with the University, with the aim of enhancing public awareness of radiological effects on human health and addressing the issue of “radiation fear” and post-traumatic stress disorders in the Fukushima population…” http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/energy/fukushima_2012/pdfs/fukushima_iaea_en_06.pdf

basis for this gag contract was the first one, quote:

“it is recognized by the World Health Organization that the International Atomic Energy Agency has the primary responsibility for encouraging, assisting and coordinating research and development and practical application of atomic energy for peaceful uses throughout the world without prejudice to the right of the World Health Organization to concern itself with promoting, developing, assisting and coordinating international health work, including research, in all its aspects.” http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/Others/inf20.shtml#note_c

fake-aid

radiation fear = Radiophobia – a non medical term: “What’s worse, the IAEA is going public these days with statements ridiculing the so called “radiophobia” of the population and calling for an end of aid programs, which, according to the IAEA report of 2005, only serve to instil a victim mentality in a totally healthy population – a claim not only cynical, but potentially dangerous for the health of the affected population.” Source: http://www.ippnw-students.org/chernobyl/coverup.html

“Presently the international organizations (WHO, IAEA) recognize as the main cause of increase of thyroid cancer in liquidators and children population after the accident their irradiation with radioactive iodine, I-131. The rest of diseases, they suppose, are provoked by psycho-emotional reactions..” (!!!…RADIOPHOBIA…!!!) There is no linear dose effect correlation, but “The bimodal dependence of effects on dose was revealed for all studied parameters. Namely, effects increased at low doses, reached maximum (for low doses), then decreased (in some cases the effect sign reversed) and thereafter increased with the increase of dosage”: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Burlakova.pdf

slow-doses-stress

THE RESULT: The new IAEA Killer Agenda: http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/pressreleases/2012/prn201234.html

IAEA invites people to come back to Fukushima. Wth kind support of the local and national authorities, the World Health Organisation, and the Fukushima Medical University. Irradiated ares will become cheap Land. Very attractive.

This IAEA program means: Resettlement of people in irradiated areas, “overcoming” the situation by ignoring the situation, Rehabilitation means: Restoration. NOT of the people, but of the IRRADIATED land, into “normality”. Radiation is forced ON the people, INTO the people, by calling it normality, and encouraging the people to come back.

This program is fed by the IAEA annual budget of over 300 millon EUR and by the nuclear industry: http://www.iaea.org/About/budget.html

while the WHO relies on Sponsoring…

“According to its statutes, the IAEA (a UN agency which reports to the Security Council) is mandated to “to accelerate and enlarge the contribution of atomic energy to peace, health and prosperity throughout the world”. It is in fact a lobby, industrial and military, which should have no role to play in public health policymaking or research.” http://mondediplo.com/2008/04/14who

whoiaeawha WHOIAEA01 cheap-death

MORE: IAEA protects against Truth and irradiates People

MORE: Japan goes the same way as Belarus: Dictatorship – a deep insight

MORE: Margaret Chan VERSUS World Health Organisation

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

EDIT 2014: 80 km distance to Fukushima: “40 micro sv / hr = 350 Millisievert per year, that is 145 times the average annual external dose limit, It is even more than 3 times the Dr. Evil Yamashita Dose limit of 100 mSv. comparison: 500 mSv were are also equivalent of 1,7 km distance to Ground Zero after the Hiroshima bomb explosion. I think this area is irradiated with more than 3,000,000 becquerel of various radionuclides (Sr90, Cs137, Pu241) per square meter. Even pro nuclear ICRP standard suggest evacuation.” https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=10200465957291378&set=vb.1830343586&type=2&theater

Two years earlier: Japan goes the same way as Belarus: Dictatorship – a deep insight

The new IAEA Killer Agenda: http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/pressreleases/2012/prn201234.html

IAEA invites people to come back to Fukushima. Wth kind support of the local and national authorities, the World Health Organisation, and the Fukushima Medical University. Irradiated ares will become cheap Land. Very attractive.

This IAEA program means: Resettlement of people in irradiated areas, “overcoming” the situation by ignoring the situation, Rehabilitation means: Restoration. NOT of the people, but of the IRRADIATED land, into “normality”. Radiation is forced ON the people, INTO the people, by calling it normality, and encouraging the people to come back. This program is fed by the IAEA annual budget of over 300 millon EUR and by the nuclear industry: http://www.iaea.org/About/budget.html

The same was done with CORE / ETHOS in Belarus: NO evacuation, but resettlement: CORE – a Chernobyl aid program that kills

They calculate cheap. Here is an example: The ICRP says the cost per person, and “rem” (1 rem = 10 mSv) is 10 to 250 US dollars. (ICRP publication 22 1973) BEIR 1972 page 69 / 70: Created by the National Academy of Sciences: suffering is “converted” in dollars. In the 1970ies the annual health care costs per capita in the U.S. estimated at $ 400 lump sum for medical expenses, based on $ 80 billion for medical expenses in 1970 (200 million citizens). Mr. Lederberg (BEIR) said that when allowed 1.7 mSv per year (mSv for nuclear workers 50 / a) is increased in 30 years, the total level of disease in the U.S.increases by 0.5 to 5%. 10 mSv increase 0.1 to 1%. In 30 years (one generation) causes $ 12,000 per head (30 x $ 400). 10 mSv per generation would result in 10-120 dollars costs (0.1 to 1% of 12,000 dollars): http://www.icrp.org/publication.asp?id=ICRP+Publication+22

“The UN Rapporteur Anand Grover criticizes the use of “cost-benefit analysis” made by the Japanese authorities (following the ICRP recommendations) since such analysis does not respect the fundamental right to health of individuals.”

MORE: http://independentwho.org/en/2013/06/22/grover-stunning-report/

New York Times October 16, 1990: President Bush set up a 100 million dollar fund to compensate victims of the nuclear weapons program. “Less expensive than paying injury and liability claims directed by the courts” http://www.nytimes.com/1990/10/16/us/us-fund-set-up-to-pay-civilians-injured-by-atomic-arms-program.html GENETIC EFFECTS not taken into account

24 years later: http://mainichi.jp/…/news/20140104p2a00m0na005000c.html TEPCO wants MONEY from VICTIMS!

8 years later: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/en/Novosti.html#Yr0011 LIQUIDATORS, fire & forget!

11 years before: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2013/03/27/dr-bertell-on-tmi-radiation-chernobyl-iaea/#jp-carousel-4201 Three Mile Island Victims unheard!

This excludes ALL genetic effects, all cancerours effects, EVERYTHING is excluded, except Radiophobia:

it is recognized by the World Health Organization that the International Atomic Energy Agency has the primary responsibility for encouraging, assisting and coordinating research and development and practical application of atomic energy for peaceful uses throughout the world without prejudice to the right of the World Health Organization to concern itself with promoting, developing, assisting and coordinating international health work, including research, in all its aspects.http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/Others/inf20.shtml#note_c

VERSUS:

Radiation Is Always Dangerous, Says World Health Organization Director-General:  http://concernforhealth.org/radiation-is-always-dangerous-says-world-health-organization-director-general/

BECAUSE of the IAEA-WHO CONTRACT, HERE ARE WHO’s CANCER CRITERIA:

The main way in which the “radiation protection industry” has succeeded in hugely underrating the ill-health caused by nuclear power is by insisting on a group of extremely restrictive definitions as to what qualifies as a radiation-caused illness statistic. For example, under IAEA’s criteria:

>    If a radiation-caused cancer is not fatal, it is not counted in the IAEA’s figures

>    If a cancer is initiated by another carcenogen, but accelerated or promoted by exposure to radiation, it is not counted.

>    If an auto-immune disease or any non-cancer is caused by radiation, it is not counted.

>    Radiation-damaged embryos or foetuses which result in miscarriage or stillbirth do not count

>    A congenitally blind, deaf or malformed child whose illnesses are are radiation-related are not included in the figures because this is not genetic damage, but rather is teratogenic, and will not be passed on later to the child’s offspring.

>    Causing the genetic predisposition to breast cancer or heart disease does not count since it is not a “serious genetic disease” in the Mendelian sense.

>    Even if radiation causes a fatal cancer or serious genetic disease in a live born infant, it is discounted if the estimated radiation dose is below 100 mSv [mSv= millisievert, a measurement of radiation exposure. One hundred millsievert is the equivalent in radiation of about 100 X-Rays].

>    Even if radiation causes a lung cancer, it does not count if the person smokes — in fact whenever there is a possibility of another cause, radiation cannot be blamed.

>    If all else fails, it is possible to claim that radiation below some designated dose does not cause cancer, and then average over the whole body the radiation dose which has actually been received by one part of the body or even organ, as for instance when radio-iodine concentrates in the thyroid. This arbitrary dilution of the dose will ensure that the 100 mSv cut-off point is nowhere near reached. It is a technique used to dismiss the sickness of Gulf War veterans who inhaled small particles of ceramic uranium which stayed in their lungs for more than two years, and in their bodies for more than eight years, irradiating and damaging cells in a particular part of the body.

quote by Dr. Rosalia Bertell, November 1999 issue of The Ecologist, pp. 408-411: http://ratical.org/radiation/NAvictims.html

At the Chernobyl IAEA forum the term “Radiophobia” was invented and used: “What’s worse, the IAEA is going public these days with statements ridiculing the so called “radiophobia” of the population and calling for an end of aid programs, which, according to the IAEA report of 2005, only serve to instil a victim mentality in a totally healthy population – a claim not only cynical, but potentially dangerous for the health of the affected population.” Source: http://www.ippnw-students.org/chernobyl/coverup.html

fear-rad

“Presently the international organizations (WHO, IAEA) recognize as the main cause of increase of thyroid cancer in liquidators and children population after the accident their irradiation with radioactive iodine, I-131. The rest of diseases, they suppose, are provoked by psycho-emotional reactions..” (!!!…RADIOPHOBIA…!!!) There is no linear dose effect correlation, but “The bimodal dependence of effects on dose was revealed for all studied parameters. Namely, effects increased at low doses, reached maximum (for low doses), then decreased (in some cases the effect sign reversed) and thereafter increased with the increase of dosage”: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Burlakova.pdf IGNORED BY IAEA, UNSCEAR, ICRP, WHO

Japan becomes a dictatorship, as Belarus: Japan approves new state secrecy bill to combat leaks http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-25102915

The IAEA advises atomic states, is the PR agency for the atomic miliatry and industry, reports to the security council and has the five VETO powers of the U.N. as members. They want to blame the radiation victims, because of their fear of radiation – called RADIOPHOBIA by the IAEA: Japan officials are going to call radiation measurements illegal and that they are disturbing the industry. Health plays no role. They are adapting the IAEA ideology of Radiophobia: The fear of radiation is worse than the radiation. And the declining birth rates among belarusians under the age of 30 – declared by the IAEA with “Radiophobia”: http://www.iaea.org/inis/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/28/073/28073803.pdf – quote “2. PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACTS OF NUCLEAR ACCIDENTS : Soon after the discovery of ionizing radiation, it was realized that radiation could harmfully affect skin tissues, body organs and the human body as a whole beside the genetic effects. Lately after the drop of the first atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki and also after Three-Miles-Island and Chernobyl accidents anew phenomenon described as RADIOPHOBIA have become apparent and widely spread..” PAGE 338.

Protection against Fear, not against Radiation!
Contract between IAEA and Fukushima Medical Universitys (“Dr” Yamashita)
“…the IAEA will endeavour to organize conferences, seminars and workshops, in cooperation with the University, with the aim of enhancing public awareness of radiological effects on human health and addressing the issue of “radiation fear” and post-traumatic stress disorders in the Fukushima population…”
http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/energy/fukushima_2012/pdfs/fukushima_iaea_en_06.pdf

BEIR 1972 still assumed it will come to more than 6.2 deaths per 100 people when irradiated with 1 sievert, the same panel twenty years later, already figured at 12.4 cancer deaths. ICRP has confirmed in 1966 that natural radiation is harmful! ICRP Publication Number 8 from 1966 on page 60. in relation to the health damage caused by natural radiation for the bulk of the world’s population is a risk of sixth order (1 to 10 dead per million per rad / gray) in a few areas with high natural background radiation the risk fifth order. 10 to 100 dead per million and rad (gray). and in 1977 the ICRP publication number 26 said, that, in this sense, regional differences of the natural radiation are so regarded, that the corresponding differences include the damage. and in the ’80s the natural radiation was simply doubled. and in 2011 it became the twentyfold in japan: 20 mSv/a. Natural radiation is used as an excuse to increase artificial radiation with radionuclide-antagonists.

They call that radiation-protection!

1971: the discoverer of plutonium and president of the USAEC (“protects” health and advertises nuclear industry at the same time, later AEC, then NRC) Glenn Theodore Seaborg resigns – at the same time the ICRP reduced the the additional maximum dose near reactors for the public from 500 mrem/annual (5 mSv/a) to 5 mrem/annual (0,05 mSv/a). Thanks to Prof. Ernest Sternglass and his studies about infant mortality near reactors;: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/inetSeries/ejs1192.html

This means: Poeple, come back! We, as IAEA tell you (with the kind support of W.H.O.) and WE protect you against the Truth. Isn’t that a finde and murderous deal? All under the eyes of the world. THIS a dictatorship. And Japan became Belarus.

100 mSv lie: http://www.strahlentelex.de/The_100_Millisievert_Threshold_Lie_Statement_German_GSS.pdf

World Health Organisation ignores health of irradiated people: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/05/27/margaret-chan-versus-world-health-organisation/

Lukashenka wants to repopulate Chernobyl Chernobyl’s Zone “quickly” http://charter97.org/en/news/2009/4/26/17680/

JAPAN! BEWARE OF IAEA AND CORE! Do not accept Dose Limits, because you can not accept gun shots on children!

Read Full Post »

The Civil Society of Japan VERSUS criminal World Health Organisation

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

by Human Rights Now:

Japanese civil society requests that the reports of the United Nations Scientific Committee on Fukushima be revised

Anand Grover, Esq., UN Special Rapporteur on the right to health, criticizes UNSCEAR report on Fukushima

Dr. Tilman Ruff (IPPNW) & Japanese NGOs re:UNSCEAR report on Fukushima (Tokyo)11/6/2013

The IAEA, WHO and TEPCO should be a case for the International Criminal Courts

After WHO, the IAEA takes UNICEF and FAO as hostage

Japanese officals and WHO ignore irradiated Japanese Children

Margaret Chan VERSUS World Health Organisation

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 71 other followers