Posts Tagged ‘Cesium 137’



The official and PUBLIC belarusian radiation map shows CLEAN areas: MOSTLY Belarus appears to be clean: And this is a LIE! An official lie!





Every Oblast (federal state) of Belarus HERE: (from the textbook, and not real measurements): http://www.rbic.by/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=256&Itemid=86

The official belarusian radiation maps from the Radiation Atlas of the Government (NOT PUBLIC) show the change over the decades (1986 – 2046):And there is NEVER a CLEAN area. I had the chance to look into the Radiation Atlas, when our NGO visited the  Kosmo Aero Geology Institute of Belarus (http://www.kosmoaerogeology.by)

helios18 helios19

“Taking into account increased sensitivity of cells of different organs and tissues of animals from chronically irradiated populations to induction of all types of mutations – genic, genomic (polyploid cells) and structural (chromosome aberrations), it is necessary to emphasise that the areas with a wide range of radiocontamination density due to the Chernobyl fallout (8-2351 kBq/m² in our tests) are zones with high genetic risk for animals and man.” http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Goncharova.pdf

the blast / federal state BREST in 1996: (Belarus) / Border to Poland – distance to Chernobyl: 460 km


then, BREST in 2006:


and BREST in 2026:


The penetration of radionuclides into deeper soil layers: The water solubility of these isotopes is essential. There exists the following sequence: Strontium> Cesium> Tungsten> Yttrium> Cerium> Zircon. http://www.landesmuseum.at/pdf_frei_remote/PHY_37_1_0085-0092.pdf. Most of these radionuclides remain a long time on the upper 1-2 centimeters, after 5 years 60 – 85% of them are decreased in 3 – 5 cm depth. http://www.dissercat.com/content/sistema-zashchitnykh-meropriyatii-i-tekhnologicheskie-priemy-vedeniya-rastenievodstva-na-sel

And now one of the most irradiated oblasts / federal states of Belarus: GOMEL, in 1986 – distance to Chernobyl: 138 km


Ten years later, GOMEL 1996:


GOMEL, 2006:


10 years later: GOMEL, 2016:


“Germline mutation at human minisatellite loci has been studied among children born in heavily polluted areas of the Mogilev district of Belarus after the Chernobyl accident and in a control population. The frequency of mutation was found to be twice as high in the exposed families as in the control group. Mutation rate in the Mogilev families was correlated with the level of caesium-137 surface contamination, consistent with radiation induction of germline mutation.” http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8614461

And this is Minsk – the capital, 2,000,000 people: According to the PUBLIC OFFICIAL MAP: CLEAN. Already in 1986. But: IRRADIATED in 2046 and 1986!

helios10 helios09

The development of Strontium 90:


Cesium 137:



helios16 helios20

and in Forests of Belarus:

helios07 helios08 helios21helios06

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14


“not until 2016, at the earliest, will we know the full number of those likely to develop serious medical conditions.” former Secretary-General Kofi Annan http://www.un.org/ha/chernobyl/docs/sgsm7778.htm

What do these Becquerel and Curie mean? ONE EXAMPLE:

555,000 to 1,48 million becquerel per m² mean 50 – 60 mSv a year! EXTERNAL! Internal not even counted in: http://tekknorg.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/16.jpg “For children of the Stolinsk District, Brest Province, who were radiated in utero from ambient Cs-137 levels up to 15 Ci/km2, morbidity was significantly higher for the primary classes of illnesses 10 years later. Disease diagnoses were manifest at ages 6 to 7 years” Page 63: http://www.strahlentelex.de/Yablokov%20Chernobyl%20book.pdf -> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10576018

MORE INSIGHT: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/04/21/good-will-is-irradiated/

AND: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/children-radiation-maps-2/

Read Full Post »


Cesium 137 in Europe:


”8,000,000,000 ~ 93,000,000,000 Bq of Cs-137 can leak to the sea every single day”: http://fukushima-diary.com/2013/03/tokyo-university-of-marine-science-8000000000-93000000000-bq-of-cs-137-can-leak-to-the-sea-every-single-day/

= up tp 0,03 g Cesium 137 PER DAY! The specific activity of 1 g of Cesium 137 (or 0.035oz) is 3,200,000,000,000 Becquerel.

The Global Cesium 137 Risk Map: http://www.mpic.de/en/press/press-information/news/probability-of-contamination-from-severe-nuclear-reactor-accidents-is-higher-than-expected.html

= 12,000,000 Cesium irradiated people each year.

Cesium 137 is a reactor nuclear fission caused Heart Killer:


FROM (PDF): http://chernobyl-today.org/images/stories/radiocesi_i_serdce_march_6__2013.pdf

Once created, it stays 300 years -> FULL decay time, becaue half-life it not the “full decay time” or – in other words: 10 human generatons. It emits Beta and Gamma. The human race and any other never knew this radioactive atom. It is in the same chemical group as potassiu, behaves totally different, total destructive, and is take in by the body as potassium, a lethal confusion. It wanders (as above) to the cardio-vascular system, stays there, changes, blocks vital processes of the body.

cesium is easy to accumulate in the heart

“50 Becquerel break your heart rhythm at 20 to 30 becquerel per kilogram of body weight” (CHILDREN!)

“if, during pregnancy, there is more than 200 becquerel per kilogram of cesium in the placenta it can lead to sudden death of the child”

“even 1 bq of Cesium 137 in Children kg is too much, and in Belarus 37 bq are the standard”

Pectin can not help to get incorporated radionuclides out of the body.”

“we can rightly consider the Cesium-137 in relatively small doses (20-30 Bq/kg); a breach of the regulatory processes in the body”

“The most easily demonstrable problems, in terms of ability to function, arise in the cardiovascular, urinary, endocrine, reproductive, digestive, immune systems, and in the sight organs



Green means: Children have 0 – 20 Becquerel of Cesium 137 per body kilogram (2,20 pounds or 35,20 ounzes). Yellow means: Children have 20 – 100 Becquerel of Cesium 137 per body kilogram:
CHILDREN RADIATION MAPS: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/children-radiation-maps-2/


Around the World Children are BORN with heart defects: https://www.facebook.com/pages/International-Childrens-Heart-Foundation/277999957440?directed_target_id=0

The Nucler Devil IAEA is relying on the Bible! The IAEA is the cause for the diseases, selling the nuclear products such as the heart killer Cesium 137 as peaceful and then acting as a therapist! Doctors! Where you at? Stand up and outrage you! People measure your food. Cesium is the reason! http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/2013/cardiovdisease.html

At the same time the WHO gives hints, how to wash hands. AND:

“Working together to prevent diseases caused by childhood malnutrition: WHO, UNICEF and IAEA consider joint technical cooperation activities”: http://www.iaea.org/technicalcooperation/Home/Highlights-Archive/Archive-2013/03152013-WHO-UNICEF.html

300 year decay time Cesium 137 is used as soil tracer!: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-89132003000300001




This is HOW nuclear industry kills Children: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2013/04/14/how-the-nuclear-industry-first-kills-the-children-and-then-the-parents/

Read Full Post »


“According to its statutes, the IAEA (a UN agency which reports to the Security Council) is mandated to “to accelerate and enlarge the contribution of atomic energy to peace, health and prosperity throughout the world”. It is in fact a lobby, industrial and military, which should have no role to play in public health policymaking or research.” http://mondediplo.com/2008/04/14who


The real World War kills peaceful and in slow motion.

Not with big explosions. Or fire. Or bullets.

It kills with cancer, food, soil, air, genomic instability, atoms.

You can see it only in oncology wards or if you compare WHOLE Generations.

And if you look between the lines:

A) “Working together to prevent diseases caused by childhood malnutrition: WHO, UNICEF and IAEA consider joint technical cooperation activities”: http://www.iaea.org/technicalcooperation/Home/Highlights-Archive/Archive-2013/03152013-WHO-UNICEF.html

B) “IAEA and FAO work together”: http://www.fao.org/ag/magazine/0410sp.htm

C) http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/2013/solidpartnership.html

300 year decay time Cesium 137 is used: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-89132003000300001

this is how Cesium 137 kills:

This is from Mr. Bandazhevsky, soon in Japan talking about Cesium 137: http://aoitoribunko.blog91.fc2.com/blog-entry-96.html

WHO is no longer funded by UN, but by sponsors (biotech, genetic engineering, nuclear industry)

IAEA annual budget: 330 million €.

The IAEA ignores cancer, leukemia, diabetes, trisomy 21, all kinds of illness, all kinds of cancer in connection with radiation, especially low radiation.

The IAEA calls it “Radiophobia”.

The present and future victims are perceived as a disturbance to the atomic industry, to the japanese government, to the companies running atomic plants. They are going to end it.

Since the foundation of the IAEA their purpose is: To serve and protect the atomic industry in these five countries: USA, Russia, China, France, Britain.

They also monopolized public health during and after atomic accidents, by the gag contract WHA 12-40 between them and the WHO (1959). IAEA and WHO say: “Panic and fear of radiation is much worse than radiation itself“ The IAEA is undermining the right of expression and legal justice.

The IAEA wants the people make believe, that the main effect of the atomic catastrophe is psychological. This is made in these steps:

- Make the people believe, that because of background radiation every additional radiation is natural, normal, not bad (known as the principle of “substantial equivalence”)

- Tell the people, that Fukushima is not as bad as Chernobyl, and, Chernobyl was a small accident (50 deaths acc. to WHO, 125,000 deaths acc. to Ukrainian health minisry 1993).

- Make the people believe, that any other statement is panic and unobjective (The IAEA uses the word “Radiophobia” for Chernobyl)

- The IAEA recognizes the disease in highly contaminated areas as not in connection with the contamination.

- Make sure that there are no independent measurements, only measurements by the atomic power plant operator, it is also important NOT to show radiation measurements during the TV weather forecasts.

- Make sure that there are no organized measurements at all, for each region, each plant, each city – especially not in the media. Or do reconstrucion on the basis of official data, which are often too low.

- Advise the officals with authentic language.

- Fake research, use faked research: Dr. Rosen (Vice director of the IAEA in 1996) said in 1996 that represent cases of cancer that occur, are a very small part of the millions of cancer cases that will occur anyway. The estimate of Dr. Rosen is a factor of 10 or more too low. Dr. Rosen replaces the number of children cancer illnesses  in the number of cancer illnesses in the elderly. (quote Prof. Michel Fernex, University of Basel, Switzerland)

Or: 25 Years with FUKUSHIMA

If no result is to be found: False initially selected indicators are used for example, when looking for cancer, choose death rather than disease rates. Dying from cancer takes time, the study must be published before the death occurs. You can also choose the wrong Pathology, and search for diabetes rather than stress. In the end statistically significant differences are not found, so it is difficult to demonstrate phenomena that may be unusual. So it is concluded that there is no relationship between the event and the pathology which was investigated. This way you can advocate nuclear power plants. (quote Prof. Michel Fernex, University of Basel, Switzerland)

- The IAEA denies damage such as leukaemia, which is caused by Chernobyl, so they can continue to talk about  “nuclear safety” to increase their own kind. (quote Dr. Katsumi Furitsu, Osaka Japan)

The main point of the contract between WHO and IAEO: No public information on health problems when could influence the development of nuclear industry.

The period of the symbols has to come to an end.
We must not confuse symbols with reality.
But we do, as we try to convince others.
The general view is that radiation causes cancer.
But somehow everyone thinks he or she is spared.
Bringing radiation and food in connection exists in no way in no thinking.
People accept cancer as a natural cause of death. “It is just us.”
Morals and ethics are missing in kindergartens, schools, universities and corporations, even in families.
I would say, start school projects “how to measure radionuclides in food, stuff, bodies” as a starting point.  I ask back: Where are schools doing this? Nowhere to be seen.

The latest from Ukraine: Heart problems with no end, solution ONLY with foreighn help / doctors:


it is recognized by the World Health Organization that the International Atomic Energy Agency has the primary responsibility for encouraging, assisting and coordinating research and development and practical application of atomic energy for peaceful uses throughout the world without prejudice to the right of the World Health Organization to concern itself with promoting, developing, assisting and coordinating international health work, including research, in all its aspects.http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/05/27/margaret-chan-versus-world-health-organisation/

Cs-134/137 detected from 15 of 15 tea leaves samples in Shizuoka prefecture | Fukushima Diary

[Express] “Heart abnormality found increasing in school medical examination”

Read Full Post »


1 Becquerel = 100 % Damage!



translated by Jan Hemmer, NGO “For the Children of Chernobyl”

original Text by Dr. Dörte Siedentopf, IPPNW Germany, for the NGO “For the Children of Chernobyl”



Stochastic effects and children:
There is statistical health damage caused by the so-called low-level radiation (above ZERO up to 500mSv.) That is not assigned to any particular people, but occur in a defined population. This issue is the subject of thousands of studies all over the world since the Chernobyl nuclear disaster, and I will discuss in detail below with reference to examples. Factors such as age, gender, health, immune system, nutrition, social situation and the duration of exposure of the radioactivity influence the onset of cancer and other diseases. Until the Chernobyl disaster, the biological effects in the body of the
radioactive isotopes have been undervalued.

It is now clear: Any radiation poses a risk especially for children who are extremely radiosensitive.

1) A child is constantly increasing in weight and size, it grows from the intrauterine embryo to adult, the younger, the faster. Therefore, the cells divide much more frequently than an adult. Cells in the division phase (mitosis) are more vulnerable to radiation than cells in the resting phase.

2) The ability of the body to recognize “defective” cells and to  eliminate them develops during childhood. An embryo has not yet this ability. Therefore  “defective” cells can multiply unimpeded and later lead to cancer or heritable diseases.

3) A child that grows must hold more substances than emiting them, more than an adult. The body of a child takes in more radioactive substances in food, drink and air we breathe than adults. Especially dangerous are 137 and Cs-134 and 137 and Sr-90 – deposited in the muscles or in the bone (see below).

4) Children have their whole lives ahead of them. Some diseases caused by radiation take a long time to occur (latency): 20 or even 30 years. Children are more likely than older adults to reach the dubious chance to see the end of this latency. In the human body there are about 200 different cell types, each has a different function.

Basically, each cell can respond to injury with four responses:

1) The damage is so severe that the cell dies.

2) The cell can repair the damage (in children see above).

3) The cell loses its ability to produce certain substances, such as in the pancreas gland which can not produce insulin anymore (increase of diabetes in Belarus among children and adults) or other digestive juices during the growth, of the thyroid hormones.

4) The malignant cells degenerate and there is cancer.

It is now clear: Any radiation poses a risk especially for children who are extremely radiosensitive.

The effect of 4 isotopes of iodine -131, Strontium-90, Tritium (H-3) and cesium – 134 / 137 on the human body I will now show more detail, not without pointing out the most toxic isotope, plutonium (Pu-239), that triggers in micrograms cancer. It is produced in each reactor in the fission of uranium, about 250kg per year and reactor. 


“In some areas where congenital diabetes had not been seen at all before the catastrophe, there were occurrences afterward and the number of cases has increased since 1986 (Marples, 1996).” PAGE 99: http://stopnuclearpoweruk.net/sites/default/files/Yablokov%20Chernobyl%20book.pdf

“Children are more endangered than adults, because their cells divide themselves constantly. Because they grow, they need permanent energy and have to deal with the impairment of their cells. With children, ailments will start earlier, one to four years afterwards, such as in the case of Chernobyl. Adults have a latency period for Cesium of 20-25 years. It is a slow death, adults who survived 25 years become ill now. The children got sick much earlier and often died.” http://fukushima-diary.com/2011/11/slow-death/ 

translation of “slow death” by Hohlie Hohltaube: http://vogelgarten.blogspot.com/2011/10/das-leise-sterben.html

Endocrinologists from the Heinrich-Heine-University in Düsseldorf and the Belarussian endocrine advice centre in Minsk cooperated on an investigation into the development of diabetes amongst children and young adults in Belarus. Over a lengthy period, 1980 to 2002, the incidence rate (new illness accumulation per annum) of diabetes mellitus Type1 – diabetes with insulin deficiency, mainly amongst young adults – was observed in two areas of Belarus that had been contaminated to very different degrees. Data from the highly contaminated Gomel area was compared with that of the comparatively slightly contaminated area of Minsk, during the periods 1980-1986 and 1987-2002. A total of 643 patients from the Gomel area and 302 patients from the Minsk area were involved in the analysis. In the years 1980-1986 (before Chernobyl) there was no significant difference between the incidence rates in Gomel and Minsk. In contrast to this, for the years following Chernobyl (1987-2002), there was evidence of a significant difference (p<0.001) in the incidence rates of both areas. The authors also discovered that the incidence rate in the Minsk area before and after Chernobyl was not significantly different, but it was in the highly contaminated Gomel area (p<0.05), where annually about twice as many children and young adults developed diabetes mellitus Type 1 after Chernobyl, as compared to the years before Chernobyl. The highest mean incidence rate was registered in the Gomel area in 1998″ http://www.ratical.org/radiation/Chernobyl/HEofC25yrsAC.html

click: Prof. Gould explains How Radiation Kills Infants

click: Nuclear Cancer Industry

click: Japanese Children Cancer Outlook / Children need absolutely CLEAN food

click: Children Radiation Maps from Belarus

click: Less girls are born because of Nuclear Power – global Population growth control

click: Low Radiation: The Petkau Effect

click: Radiation: Larger effect of small doses!


Radiation is not life-friendly. It is a hostile factor. Life has prevailed against this hostile factor. The natural radiation. The beta radiation of strontium has a range of 1 millimeter. No matter where it is installed, it reaches the stem cells with its beta radiation. From the stem cells, everything is made. So the stem cells are bombarded constantly. What are the symptoms? We received the following reports by the children of Chernobyl: Chernobyl AIDS. Symptoms of anemia with decreased number of red blood cells. A therapy resitant anemia.

Vitamins and iron will not help. The ongoing hemorrhage, the bleeding e.g. from the nose. Decreased number of platelets, which are indeed involved in blood clotting. The immune system of children. They are always sick, every little infection “throws them around”. They constantly have colds, infections. And low white blood cells in the blood. This is easily explained: With a Bone marrow suppression: The bone marrow – due to the constant bombardment – and especially because of the accumulation of strontium – lost the ability to compensate.

Radioactivity means selective delivery of energy. On the molecules in our body. They are tiny pinholes in the shortest possible time. But with full force. We are constantly exposed to such radiation damage each second. Every second. Permanenent.And life could not exist and the information of Life could not be passed on, if we have not developed effective repair mechanisms. But the repair mechanisms are very complex and it takes time. The shorter the life cycle of a cell, the less time remains for the repair. This explains why children with rapidly growing tissue, with rapidly dividing cells – are particularly sensitive to radiation. Mitosis.

Learn and then share!

Jan Hemmer

Read Full Post »


My footage from Correction of History: Forum on Radioprotection May 12 – 13 Geneva by independent WHO.org

Communication by : Alexei Nesterenko (Belarus) Director BELRAD care of children affected by ionizing radiation, coauthor of Chernobyl Consequences
of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment published by the New York Academy of Sciences: http://www.strahlentelex.de/Yablokov%20Chernobyl%20book.pdf

Title: Implementation of radioprotection for populations at local level. Radioecological atlas: Human beings and radiation.

MORE CHILDERN RADIATION MAPS: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/children-radiation-maps-2/

With more than 20 years experience, we can sum up what we have learnt about protecting local populations from radiation: children living in highly contaminated areas, who are eating food that is
highly contaminated by radionuclides, need constant radioprotection. The work that has been done by the Belrad Institute in the Narovlya district of the Gomel region, provides a good example of this.
The children received 45 cycles of radioprotection treatment consisting of 45 pectin cures and 810 WBC measurements (Whole Body Count measured with a radiospectrometer before and after the intake of pectin preparation).

BELRAD Whole Body Counter (Children and Cesium 137) summary: http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/paper2%20V.Nesterenko.ppt PowerPoint File

After each measurement, staff from the Belrad Institute for Radiation Safety held meetings with parents and teachers to examine the results. The use of milk separators which are able to reduce radioactivity in milk 68 fold.

The WBC measurements of children in those families demonstrated that levels of accumulation were decreased 3 to 4 fold.

Practical education is necessary in order to develop cooking skills and radiological knowledge.

The children should be sent for recuperation in uncontaminated regions as often as twice a year, and the entire programme of radiological protection should be made available to them.

The large scope of the work required the collation and evaluation of all the data received, which was then combined to produce a document called “A Radioecological Atlas: Man and Radiation”.

Later on the atlas was extended to include the results of measurements taken between 2008 and 2011. On the basis of these measurements, it was possible to create maps of Cs137 radionuclide contamination of children in fifteen districts: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/children-radiation-maps-2/

The projects “ATLAS2” and “Prompt Radiological Assistance for the Children of the Chernobyl Zone of Belarus” were a logical continuation of the original ATLAS project. The purpose was to update the Radioecological
atlas with the new data, and provide comprehensive and prompt assistance in those settlements where an adverse radiological situation was discovered in the course of radiation monitoring. It should also be mentioned that the ATLAS was subsequently extended by including the data received as a result of activities carried out as part of other projects and work carried out by the BELRAD Institute. Today the ATLAS presents a systematic analysis of the results of more than 300, 000 measurements.
We are well aware that our work is just a small part of what needs to be done, and that positive results can only be achieved by using a whole series of protective measures. These include: monitoring of radiation in the environment, food, and population; medical examinations; administrative measures; rehabilitation of contaminated areas; the application of modern methods in agriculture and forestry; education; the use of radioprotectors (adsorbants) for the quick elimination of radionuclides from the bodies of people, dairy and beef cattle and so on.

Cesium 137, food, children,,apple pectin: http://radionucleide.free.fr/Stresseurs/smw-Galina_Bandazhevskaya.pdf

Cesium 137 and Children: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/05/13/%E3%83%A6%E3%83%BC%E3%83%AA%E3%83%BC%E3%83%BB%E3%83%90%E3%83%B3%E3%83%80%E3%82%B8%E3%82%A7%E3%83%95%E3%82%B9%E3%82%AD%E3%83%BC-cesium-137-and-children-may-12th-2012/

Communication by: Vladimir Babenko (Belarus), Deputy Director BELRAD (author of a manual on radioprotection)

In the last few years we have often heard the opinion that the interest in Chernobyl is diminishing. In 2011 this interest like the interest in the problems of nuclear energy increased unusually. To my mind there are several reasons for this. Twenty five years after the Chernobyl accident, the accident at the Fukushima nuclear power plant in Japan and rethinking about the problems of nuclear energy. Now it is time to solve the problem of the future prospects of nuclear power plants.

Twenty five years is a period allowing the following conclusions: what have we learned during this time, what moral have people drawn from the Chernobyl accident? To my mind the first conclusion is disappointing. The Chernobyl accident demonstrated nothing to mankind. Chernobyl and Fukushima – the same problems, the same mistakes. Once it seemed that the main reason for such difficult consequences was the political regime existing in the USSR. Japan: another political regime, another natural environment, another culture and traditions. But the mistakes are the same. The main mistake is an attempt to hide the information about the real scale of the radiation accident, to minimize its consequences and to distort the real state of things.

After the accident at the Fukushima power plant it was clear that the population of Japan had not enough knowledge about radiation, no documents, no instructions regulating people’s behavior in case of a radiation accident, no literature and reference materials that could help to clarify the situation and to take simple steps for radioprotection. That is why the Japanese show interest in the Belarusian experience in minimization of the consequences of the Chernobyl accident. From here there appeared the interest in the book “How to Protect Yourself and Your Child from Radiation” that was translated into Japanese and published in Japan.
There exist problems resulting from the Chernobyl accident in our country and they will exist in our country for a long time. The people living in the districts contaminated by Chernobyl radionuclides
should constantly learn how to protect themselves from the radiation impact, should learn to live under conditions of radioactive contamination of the territory and to help themselves and their relatives to minimize the Chernobyl impact.

The necessity to set in place permanent radiation monitoring of people and the annual dose of 0.1 mSv serve as a starting point for undertaking radiation protection measures. Clause 12 of the Executive conclusion of the Recommendation of the European Committee for radiation risks declares: “…Total maximal permitted dose from all humancaused sources should not exceed 0.1 mSv for population and 5 mSv for personnel”. This publication is declared by the European Committee for radiation risks as “regulating”. It is only common sense that we should follow the recommendations given in this publication by the scientists from Canada, Norway, Great Britain, Denmark, Switzerland, the USA, Ireland, Sweden, Germany, France, India, Belarus, Finland and Russia.

“Our experience shows that the recovery of the children in the clean regions doubled parallell with taking Pectin: The cleaning effectiveness of the child’s body by the radionuclides.” http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/Belrad%20Report%2012.pdf ALSO: CLEAN FOOD ALL THE TIME!

Belarusian Chernobyl Children WHOLE BODY COUNTER Experience & FOOD Measurements & Radionuclides. “COMPARISON OF THE EFFICIENCY OF THE RECUPERATION OF CHILDREN OF THE CHERNOBYL DISTRICTS OF BELARUS IN THE NATIONAL SANATORIA AND ABROAD” http://www.physiciansofchernobyl.org.ua/eng/Docs/Nesterenko_and_%20all_report.pdf

Me and Mr. Babenko in Minsk:

MORE OF BELRAD: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/04/25/26-chernobyl-years-since-1986/

Jan Hemmer

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 71 other followers