Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘cell’

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

Interview “Hessischer Rundfunk” (Radio Station Germany) with Dr. Rosa Goncharova, from Minsk, Belarus http://www.hr-online.de/servlet/de.hr.cms.servlet.File/11-042?enc=d3M9aHJteXNxbCZibG9iSWQ9MTIwMTQ3NTImaWQ9NDExMDgxNDEmZm9yY2VEb3dubG9hZD0x

Goncharova

photo from VIDEO “Nuclear Controversies” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zCIto-rsa8o

She is a speaker at the coming Symposium “Consequences of Nuclear disasters of Nature and Man” – sign and attend here: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2014/01/01/sign-march-4th-7th-2014-chernobyl-fukushima-symposium-with-real-independent-experts/

INTERVIEW STARTS:

02 Speaker 1 “An everyday scene in the radiological monitoring station of Komarin in Belarus: A woman knocks on the laboratory door and brings a plastic bag full of pumpkin seeds. Here, levels of radioactivity of food from the contaminated zone is measured.

04 Speaker 1 “We are only about 30 kilometers from Chernobyl and close to the exclusion zone. The remote village is heavily contaminated since the nuclear disaster in neighboring Ukraine . Who lives here, who collects mushrooms here or foods of unknown origin carries home, would do well to let them inspect before consumption.

06 Speaker 1 “If the maximum permissible dose too strong exceeds, the food will be disposed as hazardous waste in the deserted 30 – kilometer zone.

08 Speaker 1 “The Woman with the pumpkin seeds is lucky. The limit of 270 becquerels per kilogram is not exceeded. Anastasija Fedosenko  director of the laboratory, complains : “In this area there is only a single measurement station, which is freely accessible to residents at all times . Previously there were six .

10 Speaker 1 “In Belarus, hundreds of thousands of people in areas that are contaminated by the explosion of the Chernobyl reactor still for centuries live there. Today it is mainly cesium -137, which provides for continuous radiation . Cesium-137 has a half -life of about 30 years. The safety formula is in the West: ” half-life x 13 times” . Eastern scientists anticipate ” half-life x 10 times” . According to these formulas, cesium -137 is not harmful to humans after Eastern invoice after 301 years , according to Western accounts it is dangerous even after 392 years. In other words, only after about 13 generations of men, the danger is gone.

12 Speaker 1 change of location. “Rosa Goncharova ‘s geneticist. In the Belarusian capital, Minsk, she directs the Laboratory of the Institute of Genetics and Cytology of the Belarusian Academy of Sciences. For decades, the professor and her team investigate the effects of long-lasting radioactive low-level radiation . What harm take people living in contaminated areas? Have to life, because otherwise 2600 villages must be relocated. Rosa Gonchrova summarizes the results of their studies this way:

13 Russian original sound Goncharova
14 Voice Over 1 “One of the key findings from Chernobyl is the fact that even low doses of ionizing radiation in animals and humans have biological and genetic consequences. This is proved today . They produce damage in the body cells and in gametes. Genetic changes were observed in our laboratory Even at a low dose of less than 100 microsieverts and even at a tolerated annual dose of one millisievert .

15 Speaker 1 “round a Milllisievert per year : This is the annual dose limit for people who do not work with these ionizing radiations and our research team found changes in the genetic material of the cell nucleus with this dose limit. For occupationally exposed persons even higher limits apply in Europe

16 Russian original sound Goncharova
17 Voice Over 1 Man , “like every other living thing, man has protection systems that repair such mutations. If man is now under the influence of additional radioactivity it is an additional burden to the organism, he must fight also against it, mutation occur.

18 Speaker 1 “But what are the consequences? Rosa Goncharova explains one of the effects on the basis of observations in children in the contaminated areas .”

19 Russian original sound Goncharova
20 Voice Over 1 “For these children, changes were found involving single genes. And the bad thing is that these children have an increased sensitivity to other unfavorable factors. That is, these children fall ill more often than others. Among the unfavorable factors are poor diet, environmental factors, chemical pollution. This applies not only for children but also for adults. They all have an increased sensitivity to other unfavorable factors.

[ personal addition;
Not better diagnostics
MORE SICK by LOWER TOLERANCE ]

21 Speaker 1 In plain English: “Who has spent his life in contaminated area, whose immune system is weakened. Radioactivity opens the doors for other health problems. The most dangerous radiation is that which is consumed in the diet. Thus, cesium -137 , for example acts from the inside on the cells, since it displaces the vital potassium in muscle tissue. Or, strontium -90, a radionuclide , which accumulates in the bones and in the bone marrow : It can get damage blood cells and as a result blood cancer can be caused”

“On the question of whether they are inherited changes in the genetic material to the next generation” , says geneticist Rosa Goncharova :

22 Russian original sound Goncharova
23 VoiceOver 1 , “we have shown for the first time genetic changes over generations of time passed in our laboratory. We have found a genomic instability after Chernobyl over 22 animal generations. These are animals that live in the contaminated areas who have to live under the influence of low doses. We have scientifically proven.”

24 Speaker 1 “Proven with one of the most common mammals in the bank vole. The cells of these mice were comparable with those of the people , says the researcher. Therefore, one could transfer many findings from it to man.

25 Russian original sound Goncharova
26 Voice Over 1 “Even after 22 generations of mice you can still see changes, mutations. They are inherited . The radioactivity remains Harmful . It so happens that many offspring or even many embryos do not survive . Those who survive , somehow come to terms with the situation. But whose genetic material is unstable , and that they also give in the next generation. And they are often sick. Your whole system is more unstable than in other animals .

[ personal addition; Mice developed a new type of cancer, AFTER 25 GENERATIONS (quote: “unusual cancer after 25 generations” at http://books.google.de/books?id=3gUAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA56&lpg=PA56#v=onepage&q=mewissen%20fo-cuses%20on%2025&f=false

27 Speaker 1 "This means that you pay a price." Rosa Goncharova :
 
28 O-Ton Rosa Goncharova
29 VoiceOver 1 "The mortality rate in these animals is very very high. But mice produce very many offspring  and therefore they CAN afford a high death rate. Man, however, will usually produce only one child. Definitely not five, six, seven at a time. In addition, he does not bring several generations in a year or during his life to the world. So we can not transfer all parts of the results that actually are transmitto humans."

30 Speaker 1"The effects of low doses of radiation are pointed in  a study that was published in December 2010 in Germany . It says within 35 kilometers of a nuclear plant fewer girls are born than in areas without nuclear power . We investigated the region of 27 plants in Germany and four in Switzerland. Less female births were stated earlier : In regions that were hit by the Chernobyl radioactive precipitation . It is believed that female embryos are more radiosensitive and therefore more likely to die than male ."


 

[personal addition: “The sex ratio (ratio of male to female live births) is significantly decreased in October 2011, 7 months after the Fukushima reactor accident. The sex ratio in October 2011 is lowest in the whole study period (January 1998 through March 2013).” http://alfred-koerblein.de/fukushima/english/index.htm

[personal additon: "the human sex ratio at birth in several European countries before and after the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant accident was investigated. A long-term chronic impact of radioactive fallout on the secondary sex ratio has been found" http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/env.958/abstract;jsessionid=69E27384F9B8CCE48A54AADC6FDA0606.d02t03

[personal addition: Millions Fewer Girls Born: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2011/06/110602-millions-fewer-girls-nuclear-radiation-births-science/

[personal addition: http://www.atomkongress.de/z_folien_busby.pdf – quote: “Nuclear site child leukemia and cancer clusters (Sellafield, Dounreay, La Hague, Aldermaston discovered in the period 1983-1996. Causality denied by
ICRP, COMARE, UNSCEAR, BEIR, WHO, EU and Nuclear Industry.” and: “New research shows that if a cell is hit, its progeny are likely to suffer from an increased tendency to general mutation. This is called genomic instability.”  PAGE 2 + 3]
32 Speaker 1 “mathematics teaching in a school in the region of Gomel. The second largest city of Belarus and the surrounding areas were severely affected by the Chernobyl around. – Aliaksandr Dmitrievitch is in Gomel director of the State radioecological Institute. There, too,do scientists research of potential consequences of low-level radiation. In the white blood cells of mice, says Aliaksandr Dmitirevitch, changes in the cell nucleus during long periods of low-level radiation are observed . And that five to eight times as often as in the control group.

[personal addition: overview Gomel: http://www.rbic.by/…/articles/files/Oblast_Gomel-Map.pdf

33 Russian original sound Dmitrievich
34 Voice Over 2 “There are changes in the DNA structure . For example, rings or micronuclei form . These are changes in the structure of DNA chains. There, for example, arise fractures.

[personal addition: http://tekknorg.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/128.jpg?w=700&h= LINK with more Scans: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2013/04/08/direct-damage-to-people-attributable-to-chernobyl/

35 Speaker 1 “The younger the mice, the faster you see changes, says Dmitirevitch .”

[personal addition: Nesterenko, founder of BELRAD: “Children receive the highest doses, because the dose coefficients, in a 3 year old child, are 5 times higher than in adults.“ http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/children-radiation-maps-2/

36 Russian original sound Dmitrievich
37 Voice Over 2 “The effect of ionizing radiation on an organism can accelerate the development of cancer.”
38 Speaker 1 “In laboratory rats , researchers at the radioecological Institute in Gomel have made a more frightening discovery.

39 Russian original sound Dmitrievich
40 Voice Over 2 “The sixth generation comes not to the world. There is simply no sixth generation, it works somehow no longer with the offspring.

41 Speaker 1 “Aliaksandr Dmitrievitch emphasizes, however, that the observed cell damage can also be caused by other environmental influences . Therefore, a direct relationship has not been established with Chernobyl : A set that can be heard by most of Belarusian scientists. Although there is ample evidence of the relationship between cell damage and radioactive low-level radiation. But there are no independent institutions in Belarus. You are responsible for all the doctrine of the authoritarian state. And today played down the consequences of the Chernobyl disaster . – Aliaksandr Dmitrievitch but does not want to play down after insisting the influence of radioactivity.”

[personal addition: Lukashenka wants to repopulate Chernobyl Chernobyl’s Zone “quickly” http://charter97.org/en/news/2009/4/26/17680/

[personal addition: "The Foundation The Children of Chernobyl in Belarus had to gave up it's legal status in Januar 2014. A new organization was founded and the application for legal recognition.
Twice, however, the name had to be changed – the word “Chernobyl”  is NOT allowed anymore and must not appear in the new name!

He says :

42 Russian original sound Dmitrievich
43 Voice Over 2 “It is always inflicts damage. And depending on how big the damage to the cells is and as many occur at onc, it can eventually lead to death.

49 Speaker 1 “The consequences of the Chernobyl disaster are  far from over. The people of Belarus, so it looks for many decades, if not centuries, is to suffer the consequences.”

[personal addition: “not until 2016, at the earliest, will we know the full number of those likely to develop serious medical conditions.” former Secretary-General Kofi Annan http://www.un.org/ha/chernobyl/docs/sgsm7778.htm

“The activity concentrations of 137Cs, 134Cs, 90Sr, 238Pu, 239,240Pu, 241Pu and 241Am in soil and in animals were measured at five monitoring sites with different ground deposition of radionuclides at different distances from the destroyed reactor. The observed temporal pattern of the radionuclide activity concentration in the studied animal populations reflects the changes in biological availability of these isotopes for biota, mostly due to fuel particle destruction and appearance of dissolved and exchangeable forms of radionuclides. Maximal values of the whole-body absorbed dose rates occurred during the year of deposition, followed by a decrease in the subsequent period. Generally, this decrease was monotonic, mainly determined by the decrease of the external c-ray dose rate, but there were exceptions due to the delayed maximum of internal exposure. The inter-individual distributions of radionuclide concentrations and lifetime whole-body absorbed doses were asymmetric and close to log-normal, including concentrations and doses considerably higher than the population mean values.” PDF: http://www.enfants-tchernobyl-belarus.org/extra/pdf-divers/telecharge.php?pdf=etb-037.pdf

“There are data on high rates of genic mutations in animal and human populations in the areas radiocontaminated by the Chernobyl fallout. So, the frequency of germline mutations at human minisatellite loci in children born on heavily polluted areas of Belarus was found to be twice as high as in the control group. In two species of voles (Microtus arvalis and M. rossiaemeridionalis), collected near the Chernobyl nuclear power plant, the range of genic mutations was hundreds of times greater than those typically found in vertebrates. Taking into account increased sensitivity of cells of different organs and tissues of animals from chronically irradiated populations to induction of all types of mutations – genic, genomic (polyploid cells) and structural (chromosome aberrations), it is necessary to emphasise that the areas with a wide range of radiocontamination density due to the Chernobyl fallout (8-2351 kBq/m² in our tests) are zones with high genetic risk for animals and man.” http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Goncharova.pdf

“Base-pair substitution rates for the mitochondrial cytochrome beta gene of free-living, native populations of voles collected next to reactor 4 at Chernobyl, Ukraine, were estimated by two independent methods to be in excess of 10(-4) nucleotides per site per generation. These estimates are hundreds of times greater than those typically found in mitochondria of vertebrates, suggesting that the environment resulting from this nuclear power plant disaster is having a measurable genetic impact on the organisms of that region. Despite these DNA changes, vole populations thrive and reproduce in the radioactive regions around the Chernobyl reactor.” http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8614463

“Transgenerational accumulation of radiation damage in small mammals chronically exposed to Chernobyl fallout” PDF: http://www.enfants-tchernobyl-belarus.org/extra/pdf-divers/telecharge.php?pdf=etb-068.pdf “With regard to the continuous buildup of transgenerationally-transmitted damage in the course of chronic radiation exposure of the parental generations, we will shortly speak of the transgenerational accumulation of transmitted biological damage” ignored by World’s Science.

Prof. Dr. Hedy fritz-niggli, Switzerland: “Ionizing radiation produces the same mutations as they occur naturally. The former, however, gives rise to coarser changes of chromosome structure. Mutations are irreversible injuries. Smallest doses may cause harm.The present stage of our knowledge does not permit an accurate statement on the kind of mutation. We can only see extreme changes of ion-density exercise influence the number of the mutations produced. At the various stages of the formation of germcells sensitivity to radiation is different. Water content and oxygen tension of the environments bear on the number of mutations produced. Anoxybiosis protects against radiation effects so that these occur mainly indirectly.Germ cells of various age respond in a different way to ion-density and to changes in environment.” https://www.thieme-connect.com/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/s-0029-1212990

In 1970 he said:
10 milli gray create 2 point mutations among 1,000 gametes. These are one seventieth ofl the natural mutation rate. If you take all chromosome mutations 10 milli gray produce one-tenth of the total mutation rate. If each year the maximum allowable dose is reached (5 mSv) the genetic mutation rate is increased in 30 years (one generation) by a fifth.

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

> BEIR III admits Petkau Effect: If gamma radiation comes from EXTERNAL, it starts protective action of the enzyme. When irradiated from the INSIDE with beta radiation of tritium, there is no protective effect: page 469 – 469 http://iopscience.iop.org/0260-2814/1/2/002/

MEANS: The lower and slower a dose is, the less it is recognized by the body. So, it causes more damage, tha high and fast doses from outside. This means: ALL REACTOR CHIMNEY EMISSIONS: http://tekknorg.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/ge-ari2.jpg

“The renowned British biologist, J.B.S. Haldane, suggested in 1948 that perpetual exposure to natural background radiation might account for most of humanity’s accumulated burden of inherited afflictions”: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/Asleep@Wheel.html#Part2 

“Natural background radiation is the mutagen which accounts for 25% or more of those cases of Irregularly Inherited Afflictions which occur because of inherited predisposition.” http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/Asleep@Wheel.html#Part2

Oxidization in YOUR DNA: http://moribin.blog114.fc2.com/blog-entry-1700.html

LOW RADIATION becomes HIGH RADIATION when ingested with food – Low Doses of Radiation – Objective Laws of their Action and Risk: http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/BurlakovaChernobyl-Belarus.pdf

= Internal Emitters are 10 to 100 times more dangerous than their external equivalent: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/06/17/nuclear-cancer-industry/

+ Children’s Mitosis even accelerates this damage, because their cells divide faster than in adults, copying the damage to the next cells, having NO TIME to repair. Faster metabolism does not help.

IAEA, WHO, UNSCEAR, ICRP even BEIR see no difference between INTERNAL and EXTERNAL radiation – this is the reason for fraud dose limits and ultimatively ATOMIC DARWINISM

Genomic Instability is caused by Internal Emitters in the body, from irradiated food, by man made nuclear fission.

RADIATION > FREE RADICAL > CELL DAMAGE > TISSUE DAMAGE > DISEASE http://www.nuclearreader.info/chapter4.html

Hiroshima & Nagsaki: Birth of a killer dose limit Agenda (T65D study 1950): http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/08/10/hiroshima-nagsaki-birth-of-a-killer-dose-limit-agenda-t65d-study-1950/

EVIDENCES:

> Hanford USA: Extremely elevated cancer incidence in staff despite lower radiation exposure: At that time, the 20-fold reduction of the dose limit was requested: By all means the officials have tried to refute the work. It was said the amounts of radiation had been measured incorrectly. It is nevertheless argued that  such employees are monitored precisely! http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/422389

> Portsmouth dockyard workers who repair nuclear submarines: 5.6 times higher rate of leukemia in 1978: http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2878%2990741-9/abstract

> different areas in New York State , 1956: Increased natural radioactivity of the soil by uranium, thorium. Increased mortality of newborns and developmental defects. 20 to 40 percent higher. One percent per mrad (0.00001 Gray): http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1372765/?tool=pmcentrez

> Close relationship between stillbirths with visible deformities and the intensity of cosmic radiation. 1960: 1.8 malformations per 1000 births at the equator. About 50 degrees north latitude: 5 malformations per 1000 births. Explainable by Petkau Effect. With the effects of radiation on the nucleus (hereditary), the greatly increased number of stillbirths would have been unable to explain: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13844093

> In many cases, increased chromosomal abnormalities in the blood of people living on thorium-containing Monozite sandy soil. Residents and workers were examined. Ten-fold increase of lead 212 in the air (beta rays) increased chromosomal defects from 0.9 to 2 percent. Another ten-fold increase in lead 212 concentration increased defects by 0.57 percent. Means: A larger effect of smaller doses: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1762904/

> 1984, New Scientist: Internal studies of the DOE Department of Energy: Workers of twelve different nuclear plants. Nine of the studies found up to 50% higher leukemia rates, above average: lung cancer, lymphoma, brain cancer, malignant tumors of the digestive organs. Common diseases of the respiratory system were more frequent. 2,529 workers were examined in plants of the DOE. All workers had received more than 50 mSv per year. The cancer rate was three times higher: http://books.google.de/books?id=YIAzHckpZswC&pg=PA3&lpg=PA3#v=onepage&q&f=false

>”When the headaches began, Gabel took aspirin and kept working. When he suffered a seizure and lost consciousness, doctors found the malignant brain tumor. When he was dying, Don Gabel tried to warn everyone about Rocky Flats… nine years after Don Gabel died in the first proven case of radiation-caused cancer at Rocky Flats.” http://books.google.de/books?id=YIAzHckpZswC&pg=PA3&lpg=PA3#v=onepage&q&f=false and Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gDjVbY85fuc

> If Oxygen in cells is replaced by nitrogen, the dose must be many times increased to destroy of the membranes. Thus, the damaging role of oxygen is demonstrated (free radicals: O negative): http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/abs/10.1139/m74-049

> Even pro nuclear BEIR III 1980 report shows: The protection of the membrane is possible by enzymes and substances. These bind free radicals. This is indirect evidence for the oxidation of the membranes in living Systems: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/201/4359/875.short

> The lower the concentration of strontium-90 in rat bone, the greater the damage to the bone marrow: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5748432 “the dose rates are too low to reduce the ‘requisite’ repair levels” PAGE 4 http://www.solarsplendor.com/Nuclear%20Research/Biological%20low-dose%20radiation%20effects.pdf

> human blood cells of radiologists and X-ray technicians (Universtity of California): For rubidium cell membranes were more permeable – So, more damage, than regular staff. The largest increase of the damage was at the lowest total doses. Percentage: A hundred times larger. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4683533

> With a high dose rate of 1900 rad (19 Gray) per minute – with nuclear explosions – is the total dose of 2000 Rad (20 Gray) needed to damage cell membranes of blood: http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/3572559?uid=2129&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&sid=21101160429691

> Rats inhaled plutonium dust – Doubling dose for cancer was only 180 mrad (1.8 milli Gray). According to conservative ICRP and IAEA guidelines, it would have amounted to 395 rad – 3.95 Gray! But it was only 1,8 milli Gray! ICRP’s estimates has been miscalculated to the 190-fold! http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4358363

> Hamsters: Larger effect of small doses: Polonium 210 was applied to their lungs: The largest increase of cancer cases arose at the lowest total radiation dose (see Petkau, Chelack, Stokke, Scott Sanders – all above): http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/639040

> Hamsters: 15 times more lung cancer by Polonium 210 in samll units over 15 weeks, than a TOTAL dose of the same amount at once: Mac Candy R.B. et al “Exp. Lung Cancer” Springer Verlag, 1974, p. 485 (http://books.google.de/books?id=kkxzmBwKt78C&pg=PA208&lpg=PA208&dq=Mac+Candy+R.B.+et+al+%22Exp.+Lung+Cancer%22+Springer+Verlag,+1974&source=bl&ots=szKH-CV3in&sig=kaT6Wsm9k2-RlwSWYJVdEscr_UU&hl=de#v=onepage&q=Mac%20Candy%20R.B.%20et%20al%20%22Exp.%20Lung%20Cancer%22%20Springer%20Verlag%2C%201974&f=false)

ONLY 7 (seven!) mSv destroy cell membranes if you use a dose rate of 0,01 mSv per minute. IF YOU use a dose rate of 260 (!) mSv per minute you have to wait until 35,000 (35 thousand!) mSv are reached! This is 5,000 times more energy! Although the first dose is low and slow This means: Slow and low doses are (over the years) MORE DANGEROUS than high doses!
http://journals.lww.com/health-physics/Abstract/1972/03000/Effect_of_22Na__on_a_Phospholipid_Membrane.4.aspx

Erythrocytes / Tradescantia and bone marrow cells are destroyed and mutate by slow and low doses: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-1-4615-8972-3_7 / http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/jyd74e00/pdf;jsessionid=8A62A199CCC3408148BD21A7212E566C.tobacco03

The rise of non-leukemia cancers in the 20th century: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1567333/bin/envhper00395-0049-a.jpg

“It is important to study the effect of low-level irradiation at the population level /in an exposed human population the number of people whose blood cells do not give an adaptive response to subsequent exposures has increased / it was shown that 15 generations of cells irradiated with the doses 10 to 50 cGy (100 to 500 milli Gray) “remember” the irradiation and respond to external stimuli differently than the control.” PAGE 60 http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/chernobylebook.pdf

Juri Dubrova created children DNA fingerprints and compared their data with the DNA profile of British children who had lived on non irradiated region. The results of the study: the higher the soil contamination by cesium-137, the higher the mutation rate in a genomic fragment:  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC378537/

Published in 1990 by Martin Gardner and Eve Roman, a study in which they examined the fathers of children with leukemia. They found: These fathers worked at Sellafield before “making” children and were exposed to radiation. The higher their dose was, the greater the risk was for their children to develop leukemia. Maximum: 5 mSv per year (Japan 20 mSv per year) repost: http://www.jstor.org/pss/29718787

Louise Parker in 1999 published a paper in which she examined primarily stillbirth in the “radiation workers” who work in a nuclear plant. She registered 9,208 births – among them were 130 stillbirths. The result of Parker’s study is appalling: When “producers” were irradiated 24 percent more stillbirths occured than of non-irradiated. (repost) http://www.lancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2899%2904138-0/abstract

Presently the international organizations (WHO, IAEA) recognize as the main cause of increase of thyroid cancer in liquidators and children population after the accident their irradiation with radioactive iodine, I-131. The rest of diseases, they suppose, are provoked by psycho-emotional reactions.  http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Burlakova.pdf

The bimodal dependence of effects on dose was revealed for all studied parameters. Namely, effects increased at low doses, reached maximum (for low doses), then decreased (in some cases the effect sign reversed) and thereafter increased with the increase of dosage.

An excpert from the movie “Nuclear Controversis” by Wladimir Tchertkoff: http://vimeo.com/33724891

Fernex – Don’t you think that during 15 years, the majority of Caesium is internal?

Gentner (UNSCEAR)– No. It’s not internal. Are you talking about the external exposure that people receive?

Fernex – I am speaking of the internal one, which they receive through food in very large population.

Gentner (UNSCEAR)– I refuse to think that whether a radiation dose is internal or external, what counts is the dose received by whatever mechanism and to prey on people’s consciousness to say that somehow, because it’s internal, it’s worse, doesn’t do service to the people.

Fernex – There are cardiac diseases found in humans, found in children which may lead to sudden death.

Gentner (UNSCEAR)– OK, we know these complications, these things are arising. But to simply say that these things have occurred following the accident, and to infer from that a blind acceptance that they are radiation related, doesn’t allow the public health authorities of these countries to serve their people.

Fernex – There are doses related in children.

Gentner (UNSCEAR)– I have not seen any information on that.

Fernex – There are universities in Belarus which have been working on this topic for nine years. And you never had any interest to what they did? http://vivretchernobyl.blogspot.de/2008/06/w-tchertkof-nuclear-controversies.html

If the food you EAT contains 1 becquerel of let’s say Cesium 137 – it’s not safe. You eat many times a day, many days a week, a month, a year, a whole LIFE. And the Full Decay Time of Cesium 137 is 300 years -> 10 HUMAN GENERATIONS – and it’s coming from every reactor, each second. That’s what we are talking about, if we say “the food is safe, it’s below the limit” – it means YOU EAT and YOU STORE it in your BODY. Becquerel after Becquerel. ALL THE TIME. After years you have hundreds and thousands of Becquerel in your body. This is not known, because Whole Body Counters for Internal Radionuclide Measurments are not as common as CT or X-Ray machines.

Cesium 137 decays into Barium – blocking the Receptors. And it sends out Gamma + Beta, destroying 100% on the cellular level. 1 becquerel = 100 % damage. ALWAYS.Mitosis: The cell in the child is damaged: Cell wants to repair, can’t, because it divides to fast (Children grow), so we have 2 damaged cells, and so on, and so on -> Cancer latency of children is very very short. But as always Doctors, Health Organisations and Authorities and even Parents blame everything else. The Atomic Industry gets away. More cancer = More profit.

“Recently, in a concerted effort to raise the permissible levels of radiation for workers and the public, members of the Heath Physics Society have been actively promoting their theory of Hormesis, namely, that low dose exposures to radiation induce “beneficial” effects such as longevity, robustness, radio-resistance and increased growth. The use of the term “beneficial” implies a judgment, not a scientific fact. Experiments backing these hypotheses have been difficult to reproduce and definitions of “beneficial” have been controversial and appear very subjective. Claims of low dose hormesis have frequently been based on high dose observations, and the only mechanisms offered for these effects has been speculation on repair overshoot at the cellular and genome level. Cell growth as “hormetic” is the most troubling claim, since illicit growth stimulation signifies catastrophe for biological organisms.” FROM http://www.ccnr.org/radiation_standards.html

BIMODAL: “Presently the international organizations (WHO, IAEA) recognize as the main cause of increase of thyroid cancer in liquidators and children population after the accident their irradiation with radioactive iodine, I-131. The rest of diseases, they suppose, are provoked by psycho-emotional reactions..” (!!!…RADIOPHOBIA…!!!) There is no linear dose effect correlation, but “The bimodal dependence of effects on dose was revealed for all studied parameters. Namely, effects increased at low doses, reached maximum (for low doses), then decreased (in some cases the effect sign reversed) and thereafter increased with the increase of dosage”: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Burlakova.pdf IGNORED BY IAEA, UNSCEAR, ICRP, WHO

with kind regards,

Jan Hemmer

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

The Japanese Government will Start GENOMIC ANALYSIS for FUKUSHIMA People:

http://fukushima-diary.com/2012/08/jp-gov-will-start-genomic-analysis-for-fukushima-people/

edit 2013: JP Gov to postpone the genomic analysis for Fukushima people for “ethical matter”: http://fukushima-diary.com/2013/03/jp-gov-to-postpone-the-genomic-analysis-for-fukushima-people-for-ethical-matter/

‎”Evidence for an Increase in Trisomy 21 (Down Syndrome) in Europe after the Chernobyl Reactor Accident” http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gepi.20662/abstract

In 1914 Thomas Boveri found that Genomic Instability causes malignant Cancer – : http://jcs.biologists.org/content/121/Supplement_1/1.full

quote: “existence of cancers produced by X-rays”

“The internal “sunburn” attributable to low dose ionizing radiation exposure may perturb homeostasis, and aggravate pathological conditions such as allergic or arthritic diseases, heart and circulatory disfunction, and cause death for the embryo, fetus or infant critically dependent on timed signal exchanges between cells for proper development.” from: http://www.ccnr.org/radiation_standards.html

Internal Emitters mimic X-Rays

“The renowned British biologist, J.B.S. Haldane, suggested in 1948 that perpetual exposure to natural background radiation might account for most of humanity’s accumulated burden of inherited afflictions”: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/Asleep@Wheel.html#Part2 

“Radiation at any level is a uniquely potent cause of chromosome mutations that can lead to so-called irregularly inherited disorders like heart disease, cancer, diabetes, multiple sclerosis, schizophrenia, asthma, rheumatoid arthritis, Alaheimer’s disease and many, many more.” http://www.nytimes.com/2000/06/25/nyregion/l-even-background-levels-of-radiation-are-harmful-922897.html

“Natural background radiation is the mutagen which accounts for 25% or more of those cases of Irregularly Inherited Afflictions which occur because of inherited predisposition.” http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/Asleep@Wheel.html#Part2

Concealed by RERF, WHO, ICRP, UNSCEAR, IAEA: “perpetual exposure to natural background radiation might account for most of humanity’s accumulated burden of inherited afflictions” http://cel.webofknowledge.com/InboundService.do?SID=V2hiHLLPklcKLlJkcJo&product=CEL&UT=A1955ZP98300019&SrcApp=Nature&Init=Yes&action=retrieve&Func=Frame&customersID=Nature&SrcAuth=Nature&IsProductCode=Yes&mode=FullRecord

“A reality-check, on evidence accumulated since 1955, suggests that the share due to natural background radiation is very probably 25% or more — maybe as high as 50%. So, it is time to consider the following scientifically credible proposition: Natural background radiation is the mutagen which accounts for 25% or more of those cases of Irregularly Inherited Afflictions which occur because of inherited predisposition.” http://cel.webofknowledge.com/InboundService.do?SID=V2hiHLLPklcKLlJkcJo&product=CEL&UT=A1955ZP98300019&SrcApp=Nature&Init=Yes&action=retrieve&Func=Frame&customersID=Nature&SrcAuth=Nature&IsProductCode=Yes&mode=FullRecord

Thomas Boveri was a very good friend of Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen - the man who discovered the invisible X-Rays: http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1901/rontgen-bio.html and: http://www.uni-kiel.de/anorg/lagaly/group/klausSchiver/roentgen.pdf

Genomic Instability is caused by Internal Emitters in the body, from irradiated food, by man made nuclear fission.

“The genomic instability is passed on in the genes and increases exponentially with each generation“: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/Chernobyl/HEofC25yrsAC.html

“Many (not all) cancer biologists now believe that genomic instability “not only initiates carcinogenesis, but also allows the tumor cell to become metastatic and evade drug toxicity” http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/GenomicInst.html

FURITSU Katsumi
Department of Genetics, Japan
> Trans-generational effects of radiation exposure from the Chernobyl Nuclear Plant Accident: A review of studies using mutation markers of repeat DNA: “radiation might have induced some sort of mechanism to increase the genetic instability of a cell.” PAGE 6: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr139/pdf/furitsu.pdf

1927: Mueller (eugenicist) found out that the Gene can be transmuted by radiation: http://www.genomenewsnetwork.org/resources/timeline/1927_Muller.php

He got the Nobel Prize for this discovery: http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/1946/muller-bio.html/

http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/06/27/artificial-transmutation-of-the-gene-by-radiation-ignored-by-iaea/

1928: ICRP was founded http://www.icrp.org/publication.asp?id=1928+Recommendations

1921: Eugenics Conferenc: http://www.eugenicsarchive.org/html/eugenics/static/images/541.html

I call it the ATOMIC DARWINISM: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/10/01/the-atomic-darwinism/

Even if all reactors are offline, the genomic instability is programmed into Life.

Why is the “Internal Emitter“(体内放射) concealed http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMQoJEZpr1A

RADIATION > FREE RADICAL > CELL DAMAGE > TISSUE DAMAGE > DISEASE http://www.nuclearreader.info/chapter4.html

“conventional” toxins disguise the main cause of almost all diseases, disabilities, and genomic damages and mutations.
The main cause is radiation.

NY TIMES 1996: “Inherited Damage Is Found In Chernobyl Area Children: changes in DNA in sperm and eggs. Such mutations are passed on from generation to generation.” http://www.nytimes.com/1996/04/25/world/inherited-damage-is-found-in-chernobyl-area-children.html ignored by World Health Organisation, concealed by IAEA. With Warning to Japan. MEASURE YOUR FOOD! Gamma beta spectrometers!

THIS IS WHAT THE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY DOESN’T WANT YOU TO KNOW: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/samuel-s-epstein/nuclear-power-causes-canc_b_251057.html?utm_hp_ref=fb&src=sp&comm_ref=false

“there was no genetic adaptation to the mutagenic effect of low level irradiation for the whole investigation period in wild populations of bank vole” – Chernobyl: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Goncharova.pdf It is a disease, a disease which takes generations! Chernobyl and Fukushima – stretch in time and space.

“By definition, an inherited mutation is present in every cell of an offspring’s body — including the lymphocytes circulating in the blood. Some inherited mutations are so harmful that the recipient always dies before ever having any children. Because such mutations can not be passed along to the next generation, they never accumulate in the population. By contrast, most inherited mutations never cause early death, and so they can be passed along to the next generation. These are the mutations which accumulate in a population. People inherit so many mutations that it is an enormous task (now in its early stages) to figure out which inherited mutations produce harmful consequences and which ones are biologically inconsequential” http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/Asleep@Wheel.html

World Cancer increases:

http://www.latimes.com/news/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-world-cancer-incidence-20120601,0,4763342.story

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2034746/Global-cancer-cases-rise-20-cent-decade.html

“Dr. Mettler (IAEA) learned well that solid cancers without a ten year latency period did not “count” as radiation-related under ICRP latency models. Therefore the Chernobyl thyroid cancers were seen, but not reported as radiogenic, since they were within five years of a disaster!” http://ratical.org/radiation/Chernobyl/CaUFtH.html

WHO lies about cancer: “qualifying five year survival as “cure”, only considering cancer,” http://mondediplo.com/2008/04/14who

“According to the National Cancer Institute, cancer incidence (all sites) in the US increased by 55% between 1950 and 1995; the trends in Europe and other industrialised nations are similar. Non-smoking related cancers are responsible for about 75% of the overall increased incidence of cancer since 1950, and cannot be explained in terms of better detection or ageing” http://www.preventcancer.com/publications/cancer-gate.php

so “only” 7,6 million cases appear: http://www.reuters.com/article/2007/12/17/us-cancer-world-idUSN1633064920071217

Cancer is as common as allergies and will soon replace “natural death”

Councilor of radiation is led by a pharmaceutical company and ICRP: http://fukushima-diary.com/2012/02/councilor-of-radiation-is-led-by-a-pharmaceutical-company-and-icrp/

Eugenics as a guiding influence within the ICRP http://nuclearhistory.wordpress.com/2011/04/16/eugenics-as-a-guiding-influence/

Chernobyl “compressed several thousand years of evolution into a decade” – New York Times 1996 http://www.nytimes.com/1996/05/07/science/chernobyl-s-voles-live-but-mutations-surge.html

http://cricket.biol.sc.edu/chernobyl/Chernobyl_Research_Initiative/Chernobyl_Abnormalities.html /

http://cricket.biol.sc.edu/chernobyl/papers/moller-et-al-2007-chernobyl-abnormalities.pdf /

http://www.plosone.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action;jsessionid=5BDEDE5952F86D3EC3C6BF9865B27DE5.ambra02?uri=info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0016862&representation=PDF /

http://cricket.biol.sc.edu/chernobyl/papers/moller-mousseau-evolution-2003.pdf /

http://cricket.biol.sc.edu/chernobyl/papers/moller-mousseau-evolution-2001.pdf /

Food Safety = Peaceful Extinction: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/05/28/food-safety-peaceful-extinction/

I think that increased thyroid cancer incidence of children from irradiated parents would be first manifestation of the induced genomic instability: http://vivretchernobyl.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/presentation-of-rosa-goncharova-genomic-instability-after-chernobyl-prognosis-for-the-coming-generations/

Stop sacrificing infants: NEW nutrition facts WITH becquerel! http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/02/19/stop-sacrificing-infants-new-nutrition-facts-with-becquerel/

Low Radiation does not exist, because internal Emitters are 10 – 100 times more dangerous than their external radiation equivalent. Everything in Food.

Less girls are born, the sex ratio is changed: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/07/15/less-girls-are-born-because-of-nuclear-power-global-population-growth-control/

Mitosis: Children are more vunerable: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/03/19/effect-of-cesium-and-strontium-on-japanese-children-japanese-officals-irresponsible/

ALL IGNORED BY IAEA, WHO, UNSCEAR, ICRP, BEIR: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/05/27/margaret-chan-versus-world-health-organisation/

translation by Tadano Fukushima Hitosi:

it was found that the lending financial institutions to run with the nationalization of TEPCO is real, and a total of approximately 770 billion yen in July. Megabanks, regional banks, life insurance companies to pool trust bank loans. In exchange for bonds issued by the Tokyo Electric Power, Tokyo Electric Power Trust Bank is to be paid in an amount equal to. Special financing is part of the overall business plan of government-sanctioned TEPCO. Megabanks such as collateral to collect funds to leverage the bond repayment is higher ranking, even if forego traditional unsecured loans, TEPCO has been bankrupt: http://news.nifty.com/cs/economy/economyalldetail/kyodo-2012061801002184/1.htm

The main way in which the “radiation protection industry” has succeeded in hugely underrating the ill-health caused by nuclear power is by insisting on a group of extremely restrictive definitions as to what qualifies as a radiation-caused illness statistic. For example, under IAEA’s criteria:

>    If a radiation-caused cancer is not fatal, it is not counted in the IAEA’s figures

>    If a cancer is initiated by another carcenogen, but accelerated or promoted by exposure to radiation, it is not counted.

>    If an auto-immune disease or any non-cancer is caused by radiation, it is not counted.

>    Radiation-damaged embryos or foetuses which result in miscarriage or stillbirth do not count

>    A congenitally blind, deaf or malformed child whose illnesses are are radiation-related are not included in the figures because this is not genetic damage, but rather is teratogenic, and will not be passed on later to the child’s offspring.

>    Causing the genetic predisposition to breast cancer or heart disease does not count since it is not a “serious genetic disease” in the Mendelian sense.

>    Even if radiation causes a fatal cancer or serious genetic disease in a live born infant, it is discounted if the estimated radiation dose is below 100 mSv [mSv= millisievert, a measurement of radiation exposure. One hundred millsievert is the equivalent in radiation of about 100 X-Rays].

>    Even if radiation causes a lung cancer, it does not count if the person smokes — in fact whenever there is a possibility of another cause, radiation cannot be blamed.

>    If all else fails, it is possible to claim that radiation below some designated dose does not cause cancer, and then average over the whole body the radiation dose which has actually been received by one part of the body or even organ, as for instance when radio-iodine concentrates in the thyroid. This arbitrary dilution of the dose will ensure that the 100 mSv cut-off point is nowhere near reached. It is a technique used to dismiss the sickness of Gulf War veterans who inhaled small particles of ceramic uranium which stayed in their lungs for more than two years, and in their bodies for more than eight years, irradiating and damaging cells in a particular part of the body.

by Dr. Rosalia Bertell, November 1999 issue of The Ecologist, pp. 408-411:  http://exacteditions.theecologist.org/read/ecologist/vol-29-no-7-november-1999-5368/29/2

The real meaning of “soon no control group” – to find epidemiologic differences and increase between people you need a control group (not irradiated people). But there is NO control group anymore! Plus: Internal Emitters – radionuclides cause genomic instability: Creating and spreading inherited malignancy! This is ALL caused by FOOD! Fukushima is Food! Do not focus on debris, you and YOUR CHILD EAT! Every day! Time is running low

Jan Hemmer

Read Full Post »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 77 other followers