Chernobyl: The Accident and it’s implications for other Nuclear Reactors

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

Speakers are:

> Dr. Sergij Mirnyi, Engineer, Physico-Chemist, Liquidator (http://www.mirnyi.arwis.com/)

> Prof. Vesily Nesterenko, Physicist, founder BELRAD institute, liquidator (http://www.belrad-institute.org/)

> Commander Robert Green, former Royal navy (http://hildamurrell.org/)

> Prof. Yuli Andreev, Physicist, liquidator (http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/15/us-japan-nuclear-chernobyl-idUSTRE72E5MV20110315)

> Dr. Wolfgang Kromp, Physicist, Nuclear advisor to Austrian Federal Chancellor (http://www10.antenna.nl/wise/index.html?http://www10.antenna.nl/wise/459/4556.html)

CLICK TO ENLARGE:

Awarness of Nuclear Explosion from graphite-moderation with water-cooling is as old as Reactor Theory itself: PAGE 382 describes the US water-cooled graphite-moderated pile at Hanford: “Because of the risks in the event of an accident, the pile must be at a remote site. For water absorbs neutrons, so that if the flow of water were interrupted and the control and safety rods failed to operate immediately, the water in the cooling annulus would evaporate and would no longer be there to absorb neutrons. Those neutrons would then be available to multiply the rate of fission in the pile, which would become violently SUPERCRITICAL; the temperature would rise, the FUEL ELEMENTS WOULD VAPORISE and RADIOACTIVITY would be widely scattered.”
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Independence-Deterrence-Policy-Britain-1945-52/dp/0333157818/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1364814030&sr=1-2

More in: “Martinez Val, Jose M., Aragones, Jose M., Mingues, Emilio, Perlado, Jose M., Velarade, Guillermio. An Analysis of the Physical Causes of the Chernobyl Accident. Nuclear Technology. Vol. 90, June 1990, pp.371 – 378.”: http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/Artikel%20zu%20Tschernobyl%20in%20Nuclear%20Technology%20Vol%2090.pdf PLUS: on PAGE 6 it reads : 2,6 g of Pu239 / Kg reactor fuel – makes 494 Kg of Plutonium 239 in the Chernobyl core, which was ejected during 2nd explosion. Compare Hiroshima bomb: little bit more than 6 Kg Plutonium 239.

Jack Harris Central Electricity Generating Board nuclear metallurgist acceptsof his colleague Ross Hesketh’s view of nuclear explosion in Chernobyl: Page7  http://www.spokesmanbooks.com/Spokesman/PDF/91Gifford.pdf More about Ross Hesketh: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/obituaries/ross-hesketh-549777.html

Robert Green’s aunt was murdered: http://www.hildamurrell.org While she was on her way preparing to present her paper  An Ordinary Citizen’s View of Radioactive Waste Management 

About BELRAD:  http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/children-radiation-maps-2/

MORE: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/11/12/the-atomic-reactor-explosions-of-fukushima-and-chernobyl/

Chernobyl was like a W-54Warhead: http://books.google.de/books?id=I3_oaypyhB8C&pg=PA165&lpg=PA165&dq=US+warhead+W54&source=bl&ots=7NtOL9qyMA&sig=p0dXQQuITX9ltmYMsyXqwEmWGi8&hl=de&ei=9q3QTrq8OOTk4QS3-c1T&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=10&ved=0CG4Q6AEwCQ#v=onepage&q=US%20warhead%20W54&f=false / http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Usa/Weapons/W54falcon.jpg

http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/ReactorNuclearExplosion.pdf

Excerpt: Chernobyl explosion released 1,200 Gigajoules: http://books.google.de/books?id=pAsAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA61&dq=1200+gigajoules&hl=de&ei=oiLMTsfSNJGyhAfXh5ivDQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CDsQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=1200%20gigajoules&f=false <- ATOMIC EXPLOSION. Steam explosion: Maxium -> 50 Gigajoules. More: http://books.google.de/books?id=vgwAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA65#v=onepage&q&f=false

Also mentioned in the 1987 released paper by NRC “NUREG 1250″: http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML0716/ML071690245.pdf

H. van Dam. says: “900 Gigajoules”: http://iopscience.iop.org/0034-4885/55/11/003

Chernobyl: NO HYDROGEN NO CHEMICAL EXPLOSION – it was too Hot!: http://books.google.de/books?id=QGlMb5wXs5sC&pg=PA174#v=onepage&q=arnott&f=false

4000 – 5000 ° K: http://books.google.de/books?id=oEqd0IeAhccC&pg=PA6&hl=de&source=gbs_selected_pages&cad=3#v=snippet&q=4000&f=false

Explosion yield of Chernobyl 0,2 – 0,3 KiloTons. Model of the Destruction of the Reactor in the No. 4 Unit of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant – by Kiselev, A. N. | Checherov, K. P.: http://discover-decouvrir.cisti-icist.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/dcvr/ctrl?action=shwart&aix=8&aid=2485630

I bring you more soon_

Jan Hemmer

Read Full Post »

BELRAD ベラルーシ 市民の放射線計測協会 – May 12th 2012

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

My footage from Correction of History: Forum on Radioprotection May 12 – 13 Geneva by independent WHO.org

Communication by : Alexei Nesterenko (Belarus) Director BELRAD care of children affected by ionizing radiation, coauthor of Chernobyl Consequences
of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment published by the New York Academy of Sciences: http://www.strahlentelex.de/Yablokov%20Chernobyl%20book.pdf

Title: Implementation of radioprotection for populations at local level. Radioecological atlas: Human beings and radiation.

MORE CHILDERN RADIATION MAPS: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/children-radiation-maps-2/

With more than 20 years experience, we can sum up what we have learnt about protecting local populations from radiation: children living in highly contaminated areas, who are eating food that is
highly contaminated by radionuclides, need constant radioprotection. The work that has been done by the Belrad Institute in the Narovlya district of the Gomel region, provides a good example of this.
The children received 45 cycles of radioprotection treatment consisting of 45 pectin cures and 810 WBC measurements (Whole Body Count measured with a radiospectrometer before and after the intake of pectin preparation).

BELRAD Whole Body Counter (Children and Cesium 137) summary: http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/paper2%20V.Nesterenko.ppt PowerPoint File

After each measurement, staff from the Belrad Institute for Radiation Safety held meetings with parents and teachers to examine the results. The use of milk separators which are able to reduce radioactivity in milk 68 fold.

The WBC measurements of children in those families demonstrated that levels of accumulation were decreased 3 to 4 fold.

Practical education is necessary in order to develop cooking skills and radiological knowledge.

The children should be sent for recuperation in uncontaminated regions as often as twice a year, and the entire programme of radiological protection should be made available to them.

The large scope of the work required the collation and evaluation of all the data received, which was then combined to produce a document called “A Radioecological Atlas: Man and Radiation”.

Later on the atlas was extended to include the results of measurements taken between 2008 and 2011. On the basis of these measurements, it was possible to create maps of Cs137 radionuclide contamination of children in fifteen districts: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/children-radiation-maps-2/

The projects “ATLAS2” and “Prompt Radiological Assistance for the Children of the Chernobyl Zone of Belarus” were a logical continuation of the original ATLAS project. The purpose was to update the Radioecological
atlas with the new data, and provide comprehensive and prompt assistance in those settlements where an adverse radiological situation was discovered in the course of radiation monitoring. It should also be mentioned that the ATLAS was subsequently extended by including the data received as a result of activities carried out as part of other projects and work carried out by the BELRAD Institute. Today the ATLAS presents a systematic analysis of the results of more than 300, 000 measurements.
We are well aware that our work is just a small part of what needs to be done, and that positive results can only be achieved by using a whole series of protective measures. These include: monitoring of radiation in the environment, food, and population; medical examinations; administrative measures; rehabilitation of contaminated areas; the application of modern methods in agriculture and forestry; education; the use of radioprotectors (adsorbants) for the quick elimination of radionuclides from the bodies of people, dairy and beef cattle and so on.

Cesium 137, food, children,,apple pectin: http://radionucleide.free.fr/Stresseurs/smw-Galina_Bandazhevskaya.pdf

Cesium 137 and Children: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/05/13/%E3%83%A6%E3%83%BC%E3%83%AA%E3%83%BC%E3%83%BB%E3%83%90%E3%83%B3%E3%83%80%E3%82%B8%E3%82%A7%E3%83%95%E3%82%B9%E3%82%AD%E3%83%BC-cesium-137-and-children-may-12th-2012/

Communication by: Vladimir Babenko (Belarus), Deputy Director BELRAD (author of a manual on radioprotection)

In the last few years we have often heard the opinion that the interest in Chernobyl is diminishing. In 2011 this interest like the interest in the problems of nuclear energy increased unusually. To my mind there are several reasons for this. Twenty five years after the Chernobyl accident, the accident at the Fukushima nuclear power plant in Japan and rethinking about the problems of nuclear energy. Now it is time to solve the problem of the future prospects of nuclear power plants.

Twenty five years is a period allowing the following conclusions: what have we learned during this time, what moral have people drawn from the Chernobyl accident? To my mind the first conclusion is disappointing. The Chernobyl accident demonstrated nothing to mankind. Chernobyl and Fukushima – the same problems, the same mistakes. Once it seemed that the main reason for such difficult consequences was the political regime existing in the USSR. Japan: another political regime, another natural environment, another culture and traditions. But the mistakes are the same. The main mistake is an attempt to hide the information about the real scale of the radiation accident, to minimize its consequences and to distort the real state of things.

After the accident at the Fukushima power plant it was clear that the population of Japan had not enough knowledge about radiation, no documents, no instructions regulating people’s behavior in case of a radiation accident, no literature and reference materials that could help to clarify the situation and to take simple steps for radioprotection. That is why the Japanese show interest in the Belarusian experience in minimization of the consequences of the Chernobyl accident. From here there appeared the interest in the book “How to Protect Yourself and Your Child from Radiation” that was translated into Japanese and published in Japan.
There exist problems resulting from the Chernobyl accident in our country and they will exist in our country for a long time. The people living in the districts contaminated by Chernobyl radionuclides
should constantly learn how to protect themselves from the radiation impact, should learn to live under conditions of radioactive contamination of the territory and to help themselves and their relatives to minimize the Chernobyl impact.

The necessity to set in place permanent radiation monitoring of people and the annual dose of 0.1 mSv serve as a starting point for undertaking radiation protection measures. Clause 12 of the Executive conclusion of the Recommendation of the European Committee for radiation risks declares: “…Total maximal permitted dose from all humancaused sources should not exceed 0.1 mSv for population and 5 mSv for personnel”. This publication is declared by the European Committee for radiation risks as “regulating”. It is only common sense that we should follow the recommendations given in this publication by the scientists from Canada, Norway, Great Britain, Denmark, Switzerland, the USA, Ireland, Sweden, Germany, France, India, Belarus, Finland and Russia.

“Our experience shows that the recovery of the children in the clean regions doubled parallell with taking Pectin: The cleaning effectiveness of the child’s body by the radionuclides.” http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/Belrad%20Report%2012.pdf ALSO: CLEAN FOOD ALL THE TIME!

Belarusian Chernobyl Children WHOLE BODY COUNTER Experience & FOOD Measurements & Radionuclides. “COMPARISON OF THE EFFICIENCY OF THE RECUPERATION OF CHILDREN OF THE CHERNOBYL DISTRICTS OF BELARUS IN THE NATIONAL SANATORIA AND ABROAD” http://www.physiciansofchernobyl.org.ua/eng/Docs/Nesterenko_and_%20all_report.pdf

Me and Mr. Babenko in Minsk:

MORE OF BELRAD: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/04/25/26-chernobyl-years-since-1986/

Jan Hemmer

Read Full Post »

Citizen-Scientist International Symposium 放射線防護のための国際会議 June 23rd 2012

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

“Scientific and Medical Views on Health Effects of Exposure to Radiation“

FROM THE WEBSITE: http://www.csrp.jp/?lang=en

“Marshalling of various scientific and medical views of importance concerning health effects of exposure to radiation. Discussion among scientists and citizens representing different views to identify points of agreement and issues to be studied in the future. Presentation of current understandings of the accident of the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant and basic data needed for full-scale investigation in the future. Study of the contents of health effects surveys, protective measures and aftercare that will be needed in the future.”

Among participants: Dr. Keith Baverstock (http://www.chernobylcongress.org/speakers/artikel/2cc0de2cee21dc8506748b53a7d1e584/keith-baverstock.html)

It can be seen as a successor to the Geneva Radiation Protection Forum: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/05/03/correction-of-history-forum-on-radioprotection-may-12-13-geneva/

This is my consumption: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/06/09/%E9%A3%9F%E3%81%B9%E7%89%A9%E3%81%8C%E6%9C%80%E3%82%82%E5%8D%B1%E9%99%BA%E3%81%AA%E6%94%BE%E5%B0%84%E8%83%BD%E6%BA%90%E3%81%A7%E3%81%99%E3%80%82-%E9%A3%9F%E3%81%B9%E7%89%A9%E3%81%AE%E7%B7%9A%E9%87%8F/

—

It could be a counterattack to the pseudo conference of IPPNW exactly 2 months later, @ Hiroshima: www.ippnw2012.org- which ignores Fukushima:

Japanese IPPNW members support the pro nuclear, anti human term “Radiophobia” (made by IAEA):

“The biggest problem is the fear of radiation and psychological stress. Stress itself,
and failure due to stress or alcohol” – QUOTE by japanese IPPNW: http://www.hiroshima.med.or.jp/ippnw/sokuho/docs/2150_006.pdf

More: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/06/03/fukushima-medical-unversity-accelerating-children-death/

Read Full Post »

Correction of History: Forum on Radioprotection May 12 – 13 Geneva

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

IndependentWHO is organising a «  Scientific and Citizen Forum on Radioprotection : from Chernobyl to Fukushima » on May 12th 2012 in Geneva.

- A Press Conference, on Friday 11th May, between 10 and 12 o’clock, at the Club suisse de la presse ;

- The Forum, Saturday 12th May, at the Ecumenical Centre, 150 route de Ferney.

- A round table discussion between speakers and the public, Sunday morning, 13 th May, at La Maison des associations.

SOURCE & MORE: http://independentwho.org/en/2012/04/08/forum-on-radioprotection/

Participiants:

- Aya Marumori and Waturu Iwata. (Japan) , Independent Laboratory (CRMS) of Fukushima: http://en.crms-jpn.com/index.html

- Mayor of Geneva (can be seen here: minute 3:20 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxCg_c-eB8Q)

- Paul Roullaud independentWHO http://independentwho.org

- Roland Desbordes, President CRIIRAD http://www.criirad.org

- Paul Lannoye. (Belgium) Scientist, Member of the European Parliament

- Alexei Yablokov. (Russia) Environmental scientist, adviser, Academy of Sciences – author (with Nesterenko) of the biggest Chernobyl study (1000,000 deaths): http://www.strahlentelex.de/Yablokov%20Chernobyl%20book.pdf

- Shinzo Kimura. (Japan) Professor, University of Hokkaido, specialist in radioprotection

- Eisuke Matsui. (Japan) Director, Institute of Environmental Medicine of Gifu, specialist in respiratory illness

- Galina Bandajevskaia. (Belarus) Pediatrician, cardiologist: http://www.amazon.de/cons%C3%A9quences-Tchernobyl-sant%C3%A9-cardiovasculaire-lincorporation/dp/2364290074/ref=ntt_at_ep_dpt_1/279-1503913-2880852

- Alexei Nesterenko. (Belarus) Director, Belrad Institute  http://belrad-institute.org/ and: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/children-radiation-maps-2/

- Vladimir Babenko. (Belarus) Assistant Director, Belrad Institute: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/04/25/26-chernobyl-years-since-1986/

- Sophie Fauconnier. (France) General Practitioner

- Paul Jobin. (France) Professor of Sociology, University Paris VII. Expert in public health consequences of industrial pollution

- Kolin Kobayashi. (Japan) Journalist, correspondent, DaysJapan: http://www.daysjapan.net/

- Youri Bandajevsky. (Belarus) Anatomopathologist, President, Centre for Analysis and Coordination “Ecology and Health”: http://chernobyl-today.org/ and: http://yury.bandazhevsky.org/information and: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/03/24/%E5%B0%82%E9%96%80%E5%AE%B6-%E3%83%A6%E3%83%BC%E3%83%AA%E3%83%BC%E3%83%BB%E3%83%90%E3%83%B3%E3%83%80%E3%82%B8%E3%82%A7%E3%83%95%E3%82%B9%E3%82%AD%E3%83%BC-%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC-belarusian-chernobyl-and-c/

- Aya Marumori. (Japan) President, Independent Laboratory (CRMS) of Fukshima: http://www.crms-jpn.com/and: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/03/18/%E3%83%9B%E3%83%BC%E3%83%AB%E3%83%9C%E3%83%87%E3%82%A3%E3%83%BC%E3%82%AB%E3%82%A6%E3%83%B3%E3%82%BF%E3%83%BC%E6%83%85%E5%A0%B1/

- Michèle Rivasi. (France) Member, European Parliament, co-founder, CRIIRAD: http://www.criirad.org

- Miwa Chiwaki. (Japan) Representative, Association of Mothers from Fukushima

- Chris Busby. (United Kingdom) Chemist/chemical physicist, Secretary CERRIE: http://www.cerrie.org/people/busby.php and: http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/chernobylebook.pdf

- Michel Fernex. (Switzerland) Professor Emeritus, Faculty of Medicine, Basel, former consultant, WHO: http://fukushima.over-blog.fr/article-the-health-impact-of-fukushima-warnings-and-recommendations-by-michel-fernex-98279018.html

- Marc Molitor : Journalist, writer.

Action from last year:

German Social Democratic party SPD: Cancel gag agreement between IAEA and W.H.O.!: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/10/04/german-social-democratic-party-spd-cancel-gag-agreement-between-iaea-and-w-h-o/

W.H.O. Secretary General “Margaret Chan” admits for the first time: RADIATION IS ALWAYS DANGEROUS: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/05/12/w-h-o-secretary-general-chan-admits-for-the-first-time-in-52-years-radiation-is-always-dangerous/

An excpert from the movie “Nuclear Controversis” by Wladimir Tchertkoff: http://vimeo.com/33724891

Unmask UNSCEAR: Conversation Dr. Michel Fernex (independentWHO Geneva) and Dr. Gentner (UNSCEAR):

Fernex – Don’t you think that during 15 years, the majority of Caesium is internal?

Gentner – No. It’s not internal. Are you talking about the external exposure that people receive?

Fernex – I am speaking of the internal one, which they receive through food in very large population.

Gentner – I refuse to think that whether a radiation dose is internal or external, what counts is the dose received by whatever mechanism and to prey on people’s consciousness to say that somehow, because it’s internal, it’s worse, doesn’t do service to the people.

Fernex – There are cardiac diseases found in humans, found in children which may lead to sudden death.

Gentner – OK, we know these complications, these things are arising. But to simply say that these things have occurred following the accident, and to infer from that a blind acceptance that they are radiation related, doesn’t allow the public health authorities of these countries to serve their people.

Fernex – There are doses related in children.

Gentner – I have not seen any information on that.

Fernex – There are universities in Belarus which have been working on this topic for nine years. And you never had any interest to what they did? http://vivretchernobyl.blogspot.de/2008/06/w-tchertkof-nuclear-controversies.html

“I want to say to you here: as long as we have the support of friends, we continue to hope that the victims will survive. I am one of the 800,000 liquidators injured by Chernobyl. These are truly the forgotten men in our country. Tens of thousands of them have already left this world, they are no longer able to speak. In the name of the others, to all of you on this Vigil, I wish you courage and a long life, that you may remain here until victory is achieved. I wish all of you good health, just as we had, all of us liquidators, before we arrived at the reactor. We were all young and full of strength. Thank you. ” Mr Vassili Nesterenko, Belarusian Physicist http://ratical.org/radiation/radioactivity/IndWHOvigil.html

PLEASE COME TO GENEVA!

For a (clean) history!

Jan Hemmer

Read Full Post »

Good Will is irradiated

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

Good Will is the name of a village in Belarus, irradiated by Chernobyl. Videos from April 4th 2012:

15 Curie per km² (555,000 becquerel per m²) Chernobyl irradiated area “Dobra Wolya“  – this is the map (Strontium 90 & Cesium 137 & Americium 241): http://www.rbic.by/images/stories/articles/files/Luninetsky-Map.pdf (middle, the large spot)

Russian written information about irradiated village “Dobra Wolya”:

http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/Chernobyl-village-Belarus-DobraWolya.pdf

555,000 to 1,48 million becquerel per m² mean 50 – 60 mSv a year! EXTERNAL! Internal not even counted in: http://tekknorg.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/16.jpg

“For children of the Stolinsk District, Brest Province, who were radiated in utero from ambient Cs-137 levels up to 15 Ci/km2, morbidity was significantly higher for the primary classes of illnesses 10 years later. Disease diagnoses were manifest at ages 6 to 7 years” Page 63: http://www.strahlentelex.de/Yablokov%20Chernobyl%20book.pdf -> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10576018

5 Curie per km² (185,000 becquerel per m²) Chernobyl irradiated area: “Kudritchi” – this is the map (Strontium 90 & Cesium 137): http://www.rbic.by/images/stories/articles/files/Pinsky-Map.pdf (the spot, middle right)

I gave BELRAD institute () on April 6th in Minsk samples to test. They measured Cesium 137 in all samples:

1. Fish (5 Curie area = 185,000 bq / m²) 72 Bq/kg, belarusian limit is 370 bq/kg

2. Eggs (15 Curie area 555,000 bq / m²) 87 Bq/kg, belarusian limit is 370 bq/kg

3. Potatoes (15 Curie area = = 555,000 bq / m²) 72 Bq/kg, ZGU = belarusian limit is 80 Bq/kg

4. Honey comb (5 Curie area = 185,000 bq / m²) 45 Bq/kg, belarusian limit is 370 bq/kg

5. Soil (15 Curie area 555,000 bq / m²) 524 Bq/kg, no limits for soil in Belarus

Here is the belarusian state guideline for food and agriculture: http://www.rbic.by/images/stories/articles/files/for_people.pdf / for milk: http://www.rbic.by/images/stories/articles/files/milk.pdf

Belarusian state started declaring 5 Curie areas CLEAN, from 1995 on: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/06/24/nuclear-crimes-belarus-says-chernobyl-irradiated-areas-are-clean/

HERE ARE BELARUSIAN CHILDREN RADIATION MAPS from BELRAD: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/children-radiation-maps-2/

Dying on irradiated soil and murdering with irradiated food is state supported: http://charter97.org/en/news/2009/4/26/17680/

This is our group from 2012: http://www.bag-tschernobyl.net/component/content/article/21-initiativen/287-generationenuebergreifende-gruppe-reist-an-ostern-nach-weissrussland.html

I was there three times. Last year our group were offered many strawberries – which we took but didn’t ate. Our driver sold them near a market for some rubels. They are going to be exported to European Union countries and / or former soviet states and also Moscow. This reminded me of the guideline for “Eating in Chernobyl”: http://iguide.travel/Chernobyl#/Eating – by the way an June 26th 2011 Ukraine stopped traveling to Chernobyl: http://www.n-tv.de/reise/Ukraine-stoppt-Tschernobyl-Reisen-article3668101.html

Rough and inaccurate radiation maps of BELARUS (Am241, Cs137, Sr90, Pu239 & 240), in Curie per km²: http://chornobyl.in.ua/karta-belorussii.html

and RUSSIA: http://chornobyl.in.ua/karty-zagriaznenia-rossii.html and UKRAINE: http://chornobyl.in.ua/karta-radionulid-ukraine.html

Chernobyl is in the supermarkets all around Russia and the E.U.: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/09/04/chernobyl-chanterelles-for-sale/

Food Safety means: Sacrificing infants and children and fetuses: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/02/19/stop-sacrificing-infants-new-nutrition-facts-with-becquerel/

Speak out the truth, do the self-evident!

In the name of the Children.

Jan Hemmer

Read Full Post »