This year G8 is in Japan
Strong quake damages Japanese atomic power plant
Fire in Japanese atomic power plant
G8 countries want new atomic power plants.
Shame on Germany they don’t want atomic power. The swines.
Why not atomic power.
It’s cheap. It’s safe. It’s even renewable, it’s clever,
reactors are running with pure oxygen and bubble gum.
And, that’s what all say: It’s damn good money.
They become lobbists and advise / pay the Governments.
Then the Governments meet and say: Let’s build new atomic reactors.
People say: Atomic energy is dangerous.
Governments say: No, IAEA and ICRP say it’s NOT.
This is IAEA
This is ICRP
The operators are ready to invest in their atomic power plants.
That’s nice of them, isn’t it.
Who one wonders, they get 37,000,000,000 EUROs of money
(our money) as subsidies for their atomic money maker plants.
And they don’t have to assure them – that’s up to 2 – 5,000,000,000,000 EUROs
of money for each reactor. Which other energy is so clever? Tell me!
Even better: The subsidies will rise because
the needed Uranium will be more expensive if countries still
want to use their atomic reactors and even build new ones,
as McCain wants, the IEA wants, Toshiba wants and other countries
want. More dependence on atomic energy. More money.
McCains 45 atomic reactos
IEAs 1,300 atomic reactors
Toshibas 65 atomic reactors
France atomic reactors
Switzerland atomic reactors
To get 1 ton of Uranium you cause 2,000 tons of radiative material.
But there is no lobby for the Uranium workers in such countries like… well
which countries? No matter.
And even if one reactor crashes – the atomic industry is
building on the ALARA (made by the ICRP / IAEA) principle -
this allows them not to pay if people are affected by radiation exposure
- when something happens in / with their reactors.
IAEA and ALARA – we don’t help you
This so clever.
Make your own rules (Atomic Industry, IAEA) and it even is accepted!
More money, money, money!
Atomic power plants have turbines – they are running with steam.
It’s the oldest principle. But hey! It’s atomic power, it’s modern.
But why do we have to use Uranium to make steam at the end?
I don’t know, who asks. More money, that’s why.
Atomic power is a centralized energy – destroy the center – no energy.
That’s the same with the Fusion reactor in ITER / France (Funded with
10,000,000,000 EUROs of money – 100,000,000,000 EUROs of money till
2050 in the E.U.). But credit the money, if you are clever you also
have your hands in Fusion not only atomic power.
The atomic industrys servant IEA / IAEA says atomic power will go
back in the year 2030. Who wonders? My money wonders.
Uranium will end in 60 years and be more expensive. More money.
Renew Uranium? That’s even more expensive and causes huge
amounts of radiative waste. But it’s more money.
Remember – there is no radioactive waste disposal on the world,
even for the 1st Generation waste directly from atomic power plants.
That costs too much money.
In the past money was worth much more, now money loses it’s value.
Attention, it’s clever! With less valuable money it’s harder to
build new energy like environmental friendly / renewable energy.
So, let’s wait and wait and wait – it will become nearly impossible.
People think: Renewable energy is too expensive and ineffective.
But wait, instead we have atomic power from the past with the good
old frameworks – as the subsidies. Let’s bet on this, let’s sell
it during G8.
Money!
Who cares for the future, when your country has hundreds of atomic power
plants – which need to be demolished – this costs more than the construction and takes
a longer time (10 years).
And with all these massive problems – who cares about a missing radioactive waste disposal.
or problems after all. Or the German KiKK Study about higher cancer risc near atomic power plants.
Guess what, let’s build more atomic power plants – so everyone lives next to one. The study will
be out of date then.
Goodnight G8
