Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Sellafield’ Category

German Government plans total pull-out from atomic power.

Remember: Total pull-out from atomic power is in the making by the following countries: Austria, Sweden, Italy, Belgium and Germany (2000). Poland stopped it’s construction of an atomic reactor (although they plan a new one in 2020), Ireland stopped the atomic program in their country.

17 of the E.U. countries do have plans for total pull-out.

Uranium is needed for atomic power plants. Uranium has a range of 60 years. If you renew Uranium for re-use in atomic power plants you get radioactive waste materials. The quarrying of 1 ton of Uranium causes 2000 tons of radiative material.

Atomic power is not environmental friendly and it cannot stop climate change.

It’s just another money printer for the industry.

Prepare yourself with easy-reads and contra-atomic information (Made in Germany):

German Federal Construction Minister wants 30 new Wind Energy Parks of 25,000 Megawatt

German politician: Atomic energy is NOT green

German KiKK study proves higher risc of children cancer near atomic power plants

German chronological plan for setting atomic power plants offline

German radioactive waste disposal to be closed till 2014

German atomic power plants operated by Vattenfall – the 2007 accidents

More scientific information:

Into the Future without Atomic energy. Pullout in 10 years – Win for Environment and Working places. CAN (Anti-Atomic coalition, Sihlquai 67, 8005 – Zurich), December 1995.

Burlakova E.B.: Low intensity radiation: radiological aspects. Radiation Protection Dosimetry Vol. 62, No 1/2 pp. 13 – 18 1995, Nuclear Technology Publishing.

Gadekar S.: Conclusion of the health survey of villages near Rawatbhata. CANE 767, 36 Cross, 4th Block Jayanager Bangalore 560 041. April / May 1993 Anumkti Vol. 6 No 5, pp. 1 – 32.

Muller, H.J.: Genetics, Medicine and Man (1947). (Memo wordpress.tekknorg: HERE)

Nussbaum R.H. & Köhnlein W.: Health consequences of exposures to ionizing from external and internal sources: Challenges to radiation protection standards and biomedical research. Medicine and Global Survive De. 1995 Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 198 – 213.

Viel J.-F.: Consequences des essais nucléaires sur la santé: quelles enquêtes épidémiologiques? Médicine et Guerre Nucléaire, janv. – mars 1996 Vol. 11, p 41 – 44. British Medical Journal, January 1997, vol. 314, pp. 101 – 106.

Wolff Et.: Thesis on Teratology and X Rays, Arch. Anat. Hist. Embr. 1936, Vol. 22, pp. 1 – 382

More HERE [1] and HERE [2]

Life-Upgrade.com

Read Full Post »

On June 29th 2008 Toshiba announced their plan to build 65 new atomic reactors. The CEO of Toshiba web told the press to build at least 33 new atomic reactors till 2015 and 65 till 2020. In 2006 Toshiba bought the U.S. company Westinghouse web –  U.S. atomic reactor builder. Now, Toshiba is No. #1 atomic reactor builder, before Areva web

Here are the other global plans:

McCain wants to build 45 new atomic power plants

IEA wants 1,300 new atomic power plants (32 each year)

Basically they want to build atomic power plants to do something against climate change (which already happened and happens). But atomic energy is NOT green energy -

see HERE why (atomic energy is not green)

or HERE – 1 ton of Uranium causes 2000 tons of radiative waste

Then, have a look at the problems in the timebombs, pardon, I meant radioactive waste disposals:

Problems in Germany

Problems in the U.S. – 1st part

Where is Toshiba from? Right, Japan.

Have a look at Japanese atomic reactors:

Strong quake damages Japanese atomic power plant

Fire in Japanese atomic power plant
Every new atomic power plant is a money printer for the industry – paid by us

Every new atomic power plant is a Plutonium factory

Every new atomic power plant is a step back and makes the world an unsafer place

Every new atomic power plant reduces the range and makes Uranium more expensive

Life-Upgrade.com

Read Full Post »

Achieved with 439 atomic power plants – that’s 439 times 2,000,000,000 EUROs.

Atomic power covers only a 10th of energy consumption in Germany.

In the 1960ies atomic power providers told the people: Power meters will be unneeded in the atomic power future.

Atomic power will be unneeded in the future.

Why are there soldiers in:

Afghanistan, the Caucasus Mountains, on the Balkan, in Sudan, Congo, in Iraq, and soon in Iran?

It’s all about ressources. Source

Uranium will be much more expensive and rare in an atomic power future and the consumption of atomic power will generate energy wars like the world has never seen before.

Every new peaceful atomic power plant

Every new peaceful reactor

is a step into an unsafe world of conflict.

And McCain See HERE and others (like the IEA and IAEA) want new atomic power plants – see HERE

And what about the Obama / Clinton unity? Have a look HERE

 

Life-Upgrade.com

 

Read Full Post »

According to a poll under Austrians Source politicians estimate the share of atomic energy on worldwide energy consumption on 35 %, the youth on 54 %.

The true share of atomic power on world energy consumption is

6 %.

6 % with 439 atomic power plants worldwide!

6 % with 439 times 2,000,000,000 EUROs!

North-Korea – a pioneer?

Source: IPPNW

Don’t even try shouting “atomic renaissance – over here!”

Life-Upgrade.com

Read Full Post »

The teratological effects of Radiation were proven by studies of Etienne Wolff in the 1930ies, in Strasbourg.  I want to remember the Thalidomid / Contergan-suit, where doctors and experts of the sued company said, there are no registers and so there are no evidences of the link between Contergan and malformation. It’s the same with Radiation and Chernobyl. In fact, there is a register in Belarus. Teratology is not limited just on Chernobyl. Similar detections were made in Rajasthan / India near atomic power plants – by Mrs. Hesse-Hornegger.

Normal operating atomic power plants are teratological and mutagen.

Basically the pro-atomic-power-lobby defends it’s ideology with the Principle of Substantial Equivalent. That’s usually the base for their research and sale of pro-atomic-power-ideology (IAEA). Then they have their physicists who decide over cases and decide which one is valid. It’s not the medics who do that inside of the IAEA. A clever system isn’t it?

The IAEA wants to ignore the proven effects by Mueller (his work: Source ) of low radiation (emitted by peaceful atomic power plants) and the KiKK Study from 2007.

You hardly find independet information on the net on these issues, but I have a list for all international readers – I called it Atomic Power Danger - HERE:

Part 1 and Part 2

A trip of 10,000 miles starts with one step.

Intelligence and honesty together is rare in the atomic power industry. It’s all about the money and atomic power plants are money printers.

Life-Upgrade.com

Read Full Post »

The IEA wants 1,300 new atomic power plants to be build till 2050. They made this public in Tokio. They want 32 new atomic power plants per Year.

HERE is their scenario (.pdf file)

The IAEA which sells pro-atomic ideology around the globe and denies any link between desease / death and high or low radiation for sure supports the opinion of the IEA.

A scenario like this would have drastic changes in energy costs – such as rising Uranium prices. From the 60 year range of Uranium we have today, with 1,300 additional atomic reactors worldwide, the Uranium range would drop to 3 years and the prices will explode more than oil does today (US $ 140 / barrel).

2000,000,000  EUROs (as for the new reactor in Finland – funded by the Bavarian Bank) per atomic power plant makes 1,300 times 2,000,000,000 EUROs. Unimaginable costs – plus mortgage crisis – plus (!) rising Uranium / shipping / security prices – plus new energy wars.

IEA and IAEA indirectly support worlds insecurity in my opion.

Every non-objective Organisation like the IEA or the IAEA which reclaims more atomic reactors (1,300 !) mustn’t wonder when countries like Iran or North-Korea want to build new atomic reactors.

Also a peaceful atomic power plant creates weapon ready Plutonium.

Don’t let IEA and IAEA destroy your money.

This is an energy-politcal Rampage!

further information HERE

Life-Upgrade.com

Read Full Post »

If Atomic Energy is Green Energy – that would be the first Green Energy which can emit radioactive Caesium 137 into Drinking Water.

citation Jürgen Trittin (party whip of the German Greens) – June 26th 2008

(Half-Life of Caesium 137: 30 years)

See what 1 ton of Uranium causes

regards,

Life-Upgrade.com

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 83 other followers