Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘IPPNW’ Category

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

From the CRMS website:

市民科学者国際会議 アーカイブ映像

講演:午前

松井英介
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/17822655

崎山比早子
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/17824364

講演:午後

セバスチャン・プフルークバイル
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/17951948

沢田昭二
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/17827015

円卓会議:

前半
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/17828447

後半
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/17829634

市民・科学者国際会議: http://www.crms-jpn.com/art/140.html

The International Conference of Citizens and Scientists: Radiation
Health Risks and Thorough Examination of the “International
Expert Symposium in Fukushima — Radiation and Health Risks”

National Olympics Memorial Youth Center, on October 12, 2011

VIDEO: http://en.crms-jpn.com/art/143.html / http://iwakamiyasumi.com/ustream-schedule/ustream2 / http://iwakamiyasumi.com/ustream-schedule/ustream4

Source: http://fr.crms-jpn.com/doc/The%20International%20Conference%20of%20Citizens%20and%20Scientists.pdf / http://en.crms-jpn.com/art/143.html

quote: “In the symposium, “scientific findings” showing low radiation doses are safe were presented in order to “address concerns with the effects of radiation” among the general public, while the “Conclusion and Recommendations” presented at the end offered no proposals or advices to minimize exposure and reduce possible disabilities. All this reminds us of what the IAEA and other UN organizations did with the International Chernobyl Project and the Chernobyl Forum about the health effect of the Chernobyl nuclear accident. The International Chernobyl Project concluded in 1991″

More: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/05/12/w-h-o-secretary-general-chan-admits-for-the-first-time-in-52-years-radiation-is-always-dangerous/ AND: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/09/18/the-atomic-devil-strikes-again-iaea-general-conference-2011-sept-19th-23rd/

and: “E. Cardis at IARC showed that cancers can significantly increase by low dose exposure, based on epidemiological results on the potential effects of external radiation exposure on cohorts of some 200 thousand workers
in the nuclear industry in 15 countries. Referring to these results, the European Committee on Radiation Risk (ECRR) objected to the ICRP risk model for underestimating “low dose internal exposure.” Meanwhile, Belarus and Ukraine epidemiological studies, which have been ignored so far by the international organizations, have reported non-cancerous lateonset disorders due to low dose exposure. They are starting to see the light of day these
years, with the publications like “Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment” (New York Academy of Sciences, 2009) and “Health Effects of Chernobyl 20 years after the reactor catastrophe” (German Affiliate of IPPNW, 2010).”

DOCUMENT: http://www.strahlentelex.de/Yablokov%20Chernobyl%20book.pdf

Background: IAEA / WHO Fukushima Symposium is Japan’s 9/11: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/09/10/this-years-911-will-be-japans-2nd-fukushima-warning/

quote: “The IAEA with it’s partners the atomic industry and military are thinking, that the public opinion is now weak enough, to blast a propaganda symposium into it and all media, along with strong pro nuclear advocats and criminals against humanity WITH: The International Expert Symposium in Fukushima - Radiation and Health Risks – September 11-12, 2011, Fukushima Medical University Their goal: Blaming the victim !”

Please support CRMS & CRIIRAD: http://en.crms-jpn.com/index.html

Or: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/08/16/donate-for-independent-radiation-measurements-in-japan-crms-project-47/

From a child in the future: “What are old persons?”

Life-Upgrade.com

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

ONE radiograph during pregnancy: 20 % increase for cancer probability before the child is 10 years old. Two radiographs during pregnancy: 28 %. Three: 70 %. FOUR:…. 100 PERCENT. There is NO SAFE LEVEL OF RADIATION EXPOSURE: http://books.google.de/books?id=aAoAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA30&lpg=PA30&dq=cancer+stewart+xray+1970+radiographs&source=bl&ots=UGZYt0TZGo&sig=ENE9wYZjjNs3Rh2XyptdZwP3Ucw&hl=de&ei=7545Tu6iF8aAOsLrvbMG&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&sqi=2&ved=0CBsQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false

No One Escapes Harm: The Essential Story of In-Utero Irradiation http://ratical.org/radiation/CNR/No1Escapes.html

The X-rays and Health Project (XaHP): http://www.x-raysandhealth.org/

THE PETKAU EFFECT: http://www.nuclearreader.info/chapter3.html

PET / CT scanner. These are systems that simultaneously do (X-ray) computer tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) of a whole person. The PET is a nuclear medicine three-dimensional method in which positron emitters are used – mostly fluorine-18 – with a half-life of 1.8 hours (or full decay time of 18 hrs). For a single whole-body examination while the effective dose climbs to 10 millisieverts (mSv) for CT alone to 25 mSv. The organ doses are correspondingly: bone marrow 29 mSv, 27 mSv lung, ovary 33 mSv, 36 mSv intestine, stomach 29 mSv. For comparison, the threshold for the population at a nuclear power plant is 0.3 mSv (effective) per year for occupationally Exposed 20 mSv per year: http://www.strahlentelex.de/MedizinischeStrahlenbelastung.htm

radioactive iron Fe-59 given to 820 pregnant women (between 10th and 35th pregnancy week). The women knew nothing about it. Result: High malignancy rates in offspring: Acute lymphatic leukemia, synovial sarcoma, lymphosarcoma, primary liver carcinoma. http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/radiation/dir/mstreet/commeet/pm04/pl4brf/pl4brd.txt

BEIR? ICRP? IAEA? SAFE LEVELS? Here are your facts, by a former NRC scientists and whistleblower: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/GreenDereg.html

K.Z. Morgan (former ICRP chairman) “there is no dose of radiatoon so low that the risk of malignancy is zero” QUOTE page 30, right, although the ICRP claimed the opposite until 1960http://books.google.de/books?id=aAoAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA30&lpg=PA30&dq=cancer+and+low+level+ionizing+radiation+morgan+k.z.&source=bl&ots=UGZYt-R5El&sig=u136wezO8Tvy5YZE-bfJhYjB-AQ&hl=de&ei=GHM5TtXrOoTKswbx4vUY&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCAQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=there%20is%20no%20dose%20of%20radiatoon%20so%20low%20that%20the%20risk%20of%20malignancy%20is%20zero&f=false

Karl Morgan “There is no safe level of exposure and there is no dose of radiation so low that the risk of a malignancy is zero”:  http://books.google.de/books?id=9-8EkIhxeK0C&pg=PA18&lpg=PA18&dq=%E2%80%9CThere+is+no+safe+level+of+exposure+and+there+is+no+dose+of+radiation+so+low+that+the+risk+of+a+malignancy+is+zero%E2%80%9D&source=bl&ots=GZXG5ZVK0i&sig=vVvf-pFUOPAPISPaBR5IWmVzlV8&sa=X&ei=AnUyUIq4L6Ss0QWtzoDgDA&ved=0CBQQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%E2%80%9CThere%20is%20no%20safe%20level%20of%20exposure%20and%20there%20is%20no%20dose%20of%20radiation%20so%20low%20that%20the%20risk%20of%20a%20malignancy%20is%20zero%E2%80%9D&f=false

more: http://books.google.de/books?id=QunaUpeENl4C&printsec=frontcover&hl=de&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

“As Alice Stewart mentioned in her talk, there are two categories of human illness that everyone agrees can be caused by exposure to atomic radiation even at very low levels. They are (1) cancers of all kinds, and also (2) genetic mutations — which can be caused right down to the lowest levels of radiation exposure. Most scientists believe that these harmful effects are linearly related to the dose, so that if the dose is doubled, the number of cancers and genetic defects will also be doubled, and if the dose is cut in half, only half as many cancers and genetic defects will be seen. It is important to realize that if a damaging dose is spread out among a very large population, so that each individual receives only a very small portion of the total dose, the number of cancers and genetic defects is in no way diminished. Thus, in the case of radioactive pollution, dilution is no solution at all.” http://www.ratical.org/radiation/WorldUraniumHearing/AliceStewart.html#MUTATE

“According to the ICRP in 1991, just 5 mSv to the testes could cause damage to offspring – yet this dose was permitted yearly to members of the public, and ten times more was permitted to nuclear workers, in all countries prior to 1990. It continues today to be permitted yearly for nuclear workers in most countries.” http://iicph.org/victims_of_the_nuclear_age

ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection) protects atomic industry NOT human health: Until 1990 ICRP said it is not necessary to evacuate people, as long as the radiation does not exceed 500 mSv. Then they lowered it from 100 mSv to 20 milli sievert (2000 percent increase for children) which Japan implemented. Which is an equivalent of 50 mammograms: http://books.google.de/books?id=Ber3ENERfGwC&pg=PA343&lpg=PA343&dq=ICRP+40++500mSv&source=bl&ots=IaOqT2MqK2&sig=l3l0MYGe_nKkaXxvFZxkkG8hP5M&hl=de&ei=gc81TpqyI4PfsgajxLG5Ag&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=8&ved=0CE0Q6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=ot%20exceed%20500%20mSv.%20The%20ICRP&f=false

NOW we know, there is only one tolerance limit: ZERO – the Reference Embryo: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/03/11/atomic-alert-in-japan/

ICRP versus ECRR: http://www.euradcom.org/2009/lesvostranscript.htm

and: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/07/15/less-girls-are-born-because-of-nuclear-power-global-population-growth-control/

The excess cancer risk from obstetric X-ray examination was directly related to the fetal dose: http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2870%2991782-4/abstract

5 mGy – 50 mGy = 5000% Leukemia increase for children: http://cel.webofknowledge.com/InboundService.do?SID=Q2kiGlBbfFgNPfKfkLo&product=CEL&UT=A1972N025000001&SrcApp=CR&Init=Yes&action=retrieve&customersID=Highwire&Func=Frame&SrcAuth=Highwire&IsProductCode=Yes&mode=FullRecord

The dosage given for diagnostic radiography is carciogenic at any rate for the foetus: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2009217/?page=9

http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2870%2991782-4/abstract

Life-Upgrade.com

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

quote from http://www.radiation.org/index​.html:

Radioactive Strontium-90 (Sr-90) is one of these elements, and one of the deadliest. The chemical structure of Sr-90 is so similar to that of calcium that the body gets fooled and deposits Sr-90 in the bones and teeth where it remains, continually emitting cancer-causing radiation. The Federal Government (U.S.) no longer measures strontium intake in baby teeth:

More: http://www.radiation.org/projects/tooth_fairy.html

RPHP is a nonprofit educational and scientific organization

Strontium 90 was created by humans / atomic age / is created by every atomic reactor on the plant. IT DID NOT EXIT BEFORE THE ATOMIC AGE. So everyone saying, that background radiaiton is the same as man made radiation lies! In a very criminal way – or is un-informed.

“The NRC does not require environmental measurements of Strontium-90, one of the most toxic radioactive chemicals emitted by nuclear reactors. The NRC, electric utilities, and public health departments have never measured levels of Strontium-90 or any other radioactive chemical in bodies of persons living near nuclear reactors.” source: http://www.radiation.org/spotlight/nrc_comments.html

More about Strontium 90 / Cesium 137 and Children:

The cesium is biological similar to the potassium and the human body can not distinguish between the good potassium and cesium. The body takes it on the breath and the food. You can not protect yourself. After intake, the cesium builds self into the body cells and destroys the energy balance of cells. It does not matter whether it consists of the liver, kidney or brain cells involved. These infected cell dies, after she pulls even before their neighbors suffer. (…)  The adults at that time have survived 25 years and are now ill. In about 4 years we’re going to see the same with japanese children. Quiet Death: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/03/19/effect-of-cesium-and-strontium-on-japanese-children-japanese-officals-irresponsible/

Cesium NOW in Tokio’s groundwater: Quiet Death for Children: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/07/04/cesium-now-in-tokios-groundwater-quiet-death-for-children/

Japan has increased radiation limits for Children 20 times – Quiet Death! http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/05/24/warning-japan-has-increased-radiation-limits-for-children-20-times-quiet-death/

Life-Upgrade.com

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

quotes:

“By mid 1998 first draft of the Guidelines was circulating between IAEA and WHO at the management level.

“Although there had been a clear agreement between the two organisations at
the management level and the work had taken place openly the IAEA withdrew
at that stage strongly advising that the whole issue should either be dropped or
revised. The issue was the proposal to lower the action level for implementation
from 100mGy to 10mGy dose to the thyroid’s of children.”

“Managerial level of IAEA refuses to endorse the report but WHO publishes Guidelines in 1999 but IAEA describes them as “DRAFT” and WHO Geneva agrees”

SOURCE:

http://www.chernobylcongress.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/Baverstock_How_the_UN_works.pdf

The WHO published it:

http://www.who.int/ionizing_radiation/pub_meet/Iodine_Prophylaxis_guide.pdf

http://books.google.de/books?id=bJWyU5i-ou0C&pg=PA169&dq=keith+baverstock+Iodine&hl=de&ei=J-QlTqnhEc-aOsik6bkK&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCoQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=keith%20baverstock%20Iodine&f=false

WHOIAEA01

Radio-Iodine: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/HanfToChern.html

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

quote by Dr. Rosalia Bertell, November 1999 issue of The Ecologist, pp. 408-411: http://ratical.org/radiation/NAvictims.html

The main way in which the “radiation protection industry” has succeeded in hugely underrating the ill-health caused by nuclear power is by insisting on a group of extremely restrictive definitions as to what qualifies as a radiation-caused illness statistic. For example, under IAEA’s criteria:

>    If a radiation-caused cancer is not fatal, it is not counted in the IAEA’s figures

>    If a cancer is initiated by another carcenogen, but accelerated or promoted by exposure to radiation, it is not counted.

>    If an auto-immune disease or any non-cancer is caused by radiation, it is not counted.

>    Radiation-damaged embryos or foetuses which result in miscarriage or stillbirth do not count

>    A congenitally blind, deaf or malformed child whose illnesses are are radiation-related are not included in the figures because this is not genetic damage, but rather is teratogenic, and will not be passed on later to the child’s offspring.

>    Causing the genetic predisposition to breast cancer or heart disease does not count since it is not a “serious genetic disease” in the Mendelian sense.

>    Even if radiation causes a fatal cancer or serious genetic disease in a live born infant, it is discounted if the estimated radiation dose is below 100 mSv [mSv= millisievert, a measurement of radiation exposure. One hundred millsievert is the equivalent in radiation of about 100 X-Rays].

>    Even if radiation causes a lung cancer, it does not count if the person smokes — in fact whenever there is a possibility of another cause, radiation cannot be blamed.

>    If all else fails, it is possible to claim that radiation below some designated dose does not cause cancer, and then average over the whole body the radiation dose which has actually been received by one part of the body or even organ, as for instance when radio-iodine concentrates in the thyroid. This arbitrary dilution of the dose will ensure that the 100 mSv cut-off point is nowhere near reached. It is a technique used to dismiss the sickness of Gulf War veterans who inhaled small particles of ceramic uranium which stayed in their lungs for more than two years, and in their bodies for more than eight years, irradiating and damaging cells in a particular part of the body.

regards,

Life-Upgrade.com

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

One link: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/

massive information overload.

regards,

Life-Upgrade.com

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

Nuclear facilities emit considerable amounts of tritium which makes the water radioactive. By cooling towers and other ways. This is the reason for rising children cancer rates near nuclear reactors:

Chance for children carcinogenic tritium emissions from each reactor every second: 100% – first two pages are from a 300 pages long german document (not for the public): http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/Tritium-DWK-LaHague-ChildrenCancer.pdf

La Hague emits 1000,000 Curie EACH YEAR! 1 Curie per km² = 37,000 Bequerel per m². AND: 20 Bequerel per Kg IN the body cause Heart Prolems and can lead to death: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/09/25/european-union-kills-legallly-150000-people-each-year-with-irradiated-food-in-germany/

Because reactors depend on heavy water as a moderator, they release larger amounts of tritium to the environment than light water reactors (…) Tritium is a carcinogen, mutagen, teratogen and developmental toxin. It becomes incorporated into DNA and disrupts the genetic code of men’s and women’s reproductive cells: http://www.iicph.org/files/IICPH-Final-Statement-re-Darlington-NNPP-May-17-20… – current Guideline and Drinking Water Quality Standard for tritium is 7,000 Bq/L, which is based on the permissible ICRP dose limit of 1 mSv/year (lowered to 0.1 mSv in water). This “standard” corresponds to a risk of 350 excess fatal cancers per million people from just one year’s consumption of drinking water, not a lifetime (70 years) 300 million people living in the US: 105,000 DEATHS PER YEAR x 30 years = 3,150,000 murdered people by the peaceful atom! Multiplied x global = weapons of mass destruction.

TEPCO & FUKUSHIMA: H-3 (TRITIUM)= 390 bq = 10540 pci per liter http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/nu/fukushima-np/f1/images/2012sampling/intake_canal_120808-e.pdf

Annual averages of tritium concentrations in air measured at distances from nuclear power stations in Canada:

http://www.ehjournal.net/content/8/1/43/figure/F1

http://www.ehjournal.net/content/8/1/43/figure/F2

from: http://www.ehjournal.net/content/8/1/43

Sources:

http://www.fraw.org.uk/mei/archive/magnox_a1_28.pdf

http://pgs.ca/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/TRITIUM.Fairlie.2010.IJOEH_July10_Fairlie1.pdf

http://www.odwac.gov.on.ca/standards_review/tritium/Tritium_Radiation_Risks_Additional_Note_for_ODWAC_Fairlie.pdf

http://www.hse.gov.uk/newreactors/presentations/250609/ian-fairlie.pdf

http://www.ippnw.de/commonFiles/pdfs/Atomenergie/factsheet_risiken_normalbetrieb.pdf

And this will continue with FUSION ENERGY:

http://www.cyberacteurs.org/cyberactions/presentation.php?id=337

Translation / quote: Tritium is a radioactive gas, highly toxic if inhaled. It falls to earth with precipitation in the form of tritiated water. The tritium atoms can replace hydrogen atoms (about half the atoms of the human body are composed of hydrogen) and in the form of tritiated water, the isotope of hydrogen can enter the food chain and set in the body, leading to damage and mutations in DNA. ASN in its “White Paper Tritium” published on Aug 7th 2010, revealed that they had underestimated the possible consequences of this radionuclide on the environment and living organisms, the risk estimate was incorrect, that further research was needed. The authors of this paper conclude that “the re-evaluation of the toxicity of tritium requires to revisit the practices on releases and storage of tritiated waste,” giving due warnings of long-standing Commission for Research and Information independent radioactivity CRIIRAD. Studies of the confinement and release of tritium in ITER have not been adequately carried out while the construction of ITER is already underway! This finding is unacceptable, the studies must be conducted in priority to any continuation of the project.

regards,

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

Millions Fewer Girls Born: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2011/06/110602-millions-fewer-girls-nuclear-radiation-births-science/

The imagination of a nuclear accident is the same as any other accident: Explosion, historically short effect, in terms of human history. No immediate deaths and injuries, then comes oblivion.

But the effect of the nuclear accident is different from any other: There are hardly dead and injured at the beginning. The pyramid is growing up, but not pointed but in width. The latency period for cesium and strontium is 25 years. The effect occurs only after years or decades.

EDIT 2013: “In December 2011, 9 months after Fukushima, there is also a significant deficit in the number of live births in Japan. A similar decline in birth numbers was found in February 1987 in southern Bavaria, the German region most affected by Chernobyl fallout. In Japan as well as Bavaria, the effect is limited to a single month.” http://www.strahlentelex.de/Infant_mortality_in_Japan_after_Fukushima.pdf

and: Perinatal mortality in Germany following the Chernobyl accident: http://www.alfred-koerblein.de/chernobyl/downloads/KoKu1997.pdf and: 福島原発事故後の日本における乳児死亡率 Infant mortality in Japan

“The most important consideration is the generally accepted value judgment that early embryonic losses are of little personal or social concern.” Dr R. Mole, 1979, a member of ICRP – The international committee which makes the dose limits WORLDWIDE ignores LIFE. http://bjr.birjournals.org/content/52/614/89

“Possible scale of lost or impaired children after Chernobyl in all of Europe and the part of Asia covered – Missing Children: 2,5 Million.” PAGE 34 http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/RIGEinEuroandCNPPc.pdf

Atomic Industry is the biggest mass murderer of all time, because it even affects unborn and UNMADE life. No dictator ever had so much power.

Cancer, immune deficiency, anemia, heart disease or cardiovascular disease, infant mortality, and leukemia. The accident may have forgotten, the DNA does not forget. There are also the by stander effects:

http://www.helmholtz-muenchen.de/ibb/homepage/hagen.scherb/Mikulov%20CR%20Scherb%20Voigt%20TIES%202007.pdf

The effect increases exponentially. Because the effects take a long time to develop, the IAEA and the WHO and UNSCEAR see no connection. Similarly, all ministries of health in the world. So all instances of the world:

http://www.atomkongress.de/z_folien_busby.pdf – quote: “Nuclear site child leukemia and cancer clusters (Sellafield, Dounreay, La Hague, Aldermaston discovered in the period 1983-1996. Causality denied by
ICRP, COMARE, UNSCEAR, BEIR, WHO, EU and Nuclear Industry.” and: “New research shows that if a cell is hit, its progeny are likely to suffer from an increased tendency to general mutation. This is called genomic instability.”  PAGE 2 + 3

Congenital Malformation and Stillbirth in Germany and Europe Before and
European stillbirth proportions before

“After Chernobyl, infant mortality rates in Sweden, Finland and Norway increased by a significant 15.8 percent compared to the trend for the period 1976 to 2006. Alfred Körblein calculated that for the period 1987 to 1992 an additional 1,209 (95% confidence interval: 875 to 1,556) infants had died.”

“From the period of atmospheric nuclear weapons testing it is known that the infant mortality parameter is sensitive to radioactivity. It therefore comes as no surprise that there are now numerous studies showing that infant mortality is not only higher in the vicinity of Chernobyl, but also further away – in Europe. In the textbooks there is nothing to be found on this yet, but it is to be found in a number of different journals.”

“n 1986 in Berlin, an unusual increase of infant mortality was observed. Compared to 1985, infant mortality in Berlin rose in 1986 from 10.6 to12.5 per 1,000 live births in the first year of life. The mortality rate of non-German infants increased over-proportionally from 9.6 auf 14.3 per thousand. The mortality rate even increased between the end of the first week and the end of the first year of life by 26 percent. There had previously been a decrease in infant mortality”

“Ever since discovering the mutagenicity of ionising radiation in animal experiments, damaging radiation genetic effects in humans have also been repeatedly considered and examined. The ICRP, however, is of the opinion that teratogenic damage (stillbirths, infant mortality, severe malformation) does not occur below a dose of 100 mSV. Since the mean dose for Germany in 1986-7 was only 0.2 mSV, according to ICRP opinion there can’t have been an increase in teratogenic damage. On the other hand, there are numerous studies from Germany, Europe and the three countries in the Chernobyl region that show that there was indeed an increase in teratogenic damage, contrary to expectations on the part of these scientists.”

Source: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/Chernobyl/HEofC25yrsAC.html

Children with oligophrenia have ZERO adaptive response (protection) against radiation and HIGH radiosensitivity (PAGE 208 – direct link below): http://books.google.de/books?id=JYk7efKZf7oC&printsec=frontcover&hl=de&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q=oligophrenic&f=false

NY TIMES 1996: “Inherited Damage Is Found In Chernobyl Area Children: changes in DNA in sperm and eggs. Such mutations are passed on from generation to generation.” http://www.nytimes.com/1996/04/25/world/inherited-damage-is-found-in-chernobyl-area-children.html ignored by World Health Organisation, concealed by IAEA. With Warning to Japan. MEASURE YOUR FOOD! Gamma beta spectrometers!

“Energy mix and a weapon strategy inseparably involve human consequences in terms of increased incidence of leukaemia, other cancers, neonatal and infant mortality, mental retardation, congenital malformations, genetic diseases and general health problems.” Source: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/inetSeries/RB89.html

In the late 70s, there were in Wisconsin / USA seven nuclear power plants without incident. The mortality of infants of lower weight (less than 2500 grams) was examined: If the officially published emission rates of the nuclear power plants increased from year to year (Source: Government of the United States), also the mortality of underweight babies was increased. http://books.google.de/books?id=Rdgo5cXrO94C&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q=Small%20babies%20die%20near%20nuclear%20plants&f=false

“According to the ICRP in 1991, just 5 mSv to the testes could cause damage to offspring – yet this dose was permitted yearly to members of the public, and ten times more was permitted to nuclear workers, in all countries prior to 1990. It continues today to be permitted yearly for nuclear workers in most countries.” http://iicph.org/victims_of_the_nuclear_age

“Possible scale of lost or impaired children after Chernobyl in all of Europe and the part of Asia coveredMissing Children: 2,5 Million.” PAGE 34 http://www.ratical.org/radiation/Chernobyl/RIGEinEuroandCNPPc.pdf

COMPARE atomic bomb tests:

Nobel peace laureate Linus Pauling proved, that by fallout of the atomic and h bomb tests of 1958 15.000 children with severe hereditary error came to the world in one year. 38,000 children were born dead. 90,000 were murdered inside of the mother.  http://books.google.de/books?id=2QduA19d_X8C&pg=PA1310&dq=Linus+Pauling:+Biomolecular+sciences+90,000&hl=de&ei=tXlGTuMWg8PxA4rQscoG&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CDEQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false In 1963 the radioactivity in milk was so high, the public got alarmed. But the USAEC denied everything. Former President Kennedy held his speech and demanded the bomb test stop. Ironically, the health authorities were particularly zealous advocates of nuclear bombs Supporters.

Perinatal mortality rates in the regions of Ukraine and Belarus surrounding the Chernobyl site increased in 1987, the year following the Chernobyl accident. The same year, increases of perinatal mortality were also observed in Germany and Poland, and the effect can be associated with the caesium burden in pregnant women. After 1989, there is an unexpected second rise of perinatal mortality in Belarus and Ukraine. This increase is shown to correlate with the strontium content in pregnant women. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12754809

the human sex ratio at birth in several European countries before and after the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant accident was investigated. A long-term chronic impact of radioactive fallout on the secondary sex ratio has been found http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/env.958/abstract;jsessionid=69E27384F9B8CCE48A54AADC6FDA0606.d02t03

Mother Instinct = Disruptive Factor: http://www.ars.usda.gov/is/ar/archive/nov95/broodiness1195.htm?pf=1 genetically turned off. Prolactin for mother instinct comes from the pituitary gland.

yttrium 90, the daughter product of strontium — were known to concentrate in the pituitary gland.” “even slight damage to the pituitary gland from radioactivity in the air or in the mother’s diet could lead to a slight retardation in development” http://www.ratical.org/radiation/SecretFallout/SFchp14.html

“… The doctors reminisce: In one village we found twelve lactating elderly women, that is, women 70 years of age had milk in their breasts, as though they were nursing. Experts can argue about the effects of small doses of radiation, but the ordinary person cannot even begin to imagine such a thing. … ” http://www.amazon.de/Voices-Chernobyl-History-Nuclear-Disaster/dp/0312425848

“abnormal production of prolactin hormone, a cause of lactation in elderly women.”: PAGE 58: http://www.strahlentelex.de/Yablokov%20Chernobyl%20book.pdf

“Incorporation by of radionuclides (137Cs and 90Sr) with food (meat and grain) affects the offspring prenatal and postnatal development manifested by embryotoxic effects and abnormal bony system develop­ment” http://radionucleide.free.fr/Chapitre_1.htm

Wolff used X-Rays to produce Intersexuality, or an effect of radiation causes a change in hormon balance (as seen in the thyroid gland -> Iodine 131), and so, Intersexuality is caused. We know since 2011 for sure, that Nuclear Reactors cause a changed sex-ratio (less girls) and that XX is more vunerable to radiation. So, it could be, that the atomic age increased Intersexuality and also (if not organic) even increased (probably) homosexuality:http://books.google.de/books?id=9ZUsXdsX57cC&pg=PA265&lpg=PA265&dq=%C3%89tienne+Wolff+intersexuality&source=bl&ots=ZyTgkEq1pu&sig=NNCFNCDYeS3Vw9nXtFM0m8jgJP0&hl=en#v=onepage&q=%C3%89tienne%20Wolff%20intersexuality&f=false and: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15906220

“Incorporation by of radionuclides (137Cs and 90Sr) with food (meat and grain) affects the offspring prenatal and postnatal development manifested by embryotoxic effects and abnormal bony system develop­ment” http://radionucleide.free.fr/Chapitre_1.htm

“… The doctors reminisce: In one village we found twelve lactating elderly women, that is, women 70 years of age had milk in their breasts, as though they were nursing. Experts can argue about the effects of small doses of radiation, but the ordinary person cannot even begin to imagine such a thing. … ” http://www.amazon.de/Voices-Chernobyl-History-Nuclear-Disaster/dp/0312425848

P. Ancel and E. Wolff in 1934 X-ray irradiation of the embryonic heart causes malformed embryos with extensive abnormalities: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q&esrc=s&source=web&cd=4&ved=0CDQQFjAD&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ijdb.ehu.es%2Fweb%2Fcontents.php%3Fvol%3D49%26issue%3D2-3%26doi%3D041944cg&ei=Cck4UJivNYWo0QWT1YCIDw&usg=AFQjCNEv1YvK2lP4U-taMn-2hmg-wF4CFw&cad=rja

embryonic cells are radiosensitive during the morphogenetic phases (1924. 1925, 1928) and radiation causes omphalocephalic chick embryos: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=0CCYQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ijdb.ehu.es%2Fweb%2Fcontents.php%3Fvol%3D34%26issue%3D1%26doi%3D2203449&ei=gck4UK6_N-qn0QXPyYGgDw&usg=AFQjCNEdBmUO_FTQeuzIQA4D1JzhZ1EcGg

“Natural background radiation is the mutagen which accounts for 25% or more of those cases of Irregularly Inherited Afflictions which occur because of inherited predisposition.” http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/Asleep@Wheel.html#Part2 THERE IS NO PEACEFUL ATOM!

Concealed by RERF, WHO, ICRP, UNSCEAR, IAEA: “perpetual exposure to natural background radiation might account for most of humanity’s accumulated burden of inherited afflictions” http://cel.webofknowledge.com/InboundService.do?SID=V2hiHLLPklcKLlJkcJo&product=CEL&UT=A1955ZP98300019&SrcApp=Nature&Init=Yes&action=retrieve&Func=Frame&customersID=Nature&SrcAuth=Nature&IsProductCode=Yes&mode=FullRecord

The full impact of nuclear technology is reflected in the DNA.
From then on, ALL diseases are possible.
An not refined calculations, inhuman statistics, designed studies.
http://www.ratical.org/radiation/inetSeries/NIDcell.html#NID

“Children receive the highest doses, because the dose coefficients, in a 3 year old child, are 5 times higher than in adults.“ Vassily Nesterenko: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/children-radiation-maps-2/

“the human infant while nursing may attain higher body bur dens of radiocesium than would be the case for somewhat older children.”: http://radionucleide.free.fr/Stresseurs/419.pdf

The atmospheric atomic bomb test fallout affected the human sex odds at birth overall, and the Chernobyl fallout had a similar impact in Europe and parts of Asia. The birth sex odds near nuclear facilities are also distorted. The persistently disturbed secular human sex odds trends allow the estimation of the global deficit of births in the range of several millions. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21336635

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9039384 The human sex odds at birth after the atmospheric atomic bomb tests, after Chernobyl, and in the vicinity of nuclear facilities http://www.springerlink.com/content/q15h473440512601/

A positive association of the male proportion in Germany between 1986 and 1991 with radioactive exposure at the district level is reflected by a sex odds ratio of 1.0145 per mSv/a These findings suggest a possible long-term chronic influence of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant accident on the human sex odds at birth in several European countries. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17482426

Why is there nuclear industry and the reactors? For money? Because of the atomic bomb? Why were all people exposed to chronic low-level radiation by above-ground nuclear tests? It is a planned nuclear Darwinism? http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/06/21/atomic-darwinism/

Natural low-level radiation makes life, influenced the shape, caused mutations, diseases and even death. This does the man-made low-level radiation now increasingly, accelerating, in addition. With elements which did not exist before the atomic age: strontium, cesium, iodine, plutonium.

Is this a humanity program? Children suffering from leukemia are collateral damage?

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/grndwtr-contam-tritium.html – quote: “Tritium is a mildly radioactive type of hydrogen that occurs both naturally and during the operation of nuclear power plants.” PAGE 1

in contrast:

http://www.fraw.org.uk/mei/archive/magnox_a1_28.pdf – and:

http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/documents/WS1_thiel_Increased_Leukaemia_childhood_engl.pdf – quote: “The low-level radiation -and not “coincidence”- remains the only plausible explanation of the increased cancer rates.” PAGE 5

page 2: “Anencephaly, severe spina bifida cystica, cleft lips
and/or palate, polydactyly, reduction limb defects leading to disability, esophageal atresia, anorectal atresias, Down’s syndrome and multiple
malformations are registered both in stillborns and in fetuses obtained through induced abortion after prenatal diagnostics. The results are presented in Table 2 for the 137Cs contaminated areas and for the control.” quote and scan from: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Lazjuk.pdf

update: “if, during pregnancy, there is more than 200 becquerel per kilogram of cesium in the placenta it can lead to sudden death of the child” http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=z9ptFpWJ_eo

By low-level radiation from accidents and tritium emissions from cooling towers less girls are born:

http://www.tschernobylkongress.de/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/ScherbVoigt_fehlbildungen_fehlende_geburten.pdf – quote: “The gender gap in 1987 – 2007 (Chernobyl gender gap) corresponds to approximately 440 000 theoretical missing female births when only the female sex was affected. If also male births were affected at a ratio of male: female = 3:10, is the gender gap by about 790 000 (180 000 +610 000) male + female births” PAGE 32

Dr, Scherb, Institute of Biomathematics and Biometry Germany: “The relative risks for stillbirth and preliminary malformations are 0,5 – 2 % per 1000 becquerel of Cesium 137 in m² soil.” Page 33http://www.tschernobylkongress.de/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/ScherbVoigt_fehlbildungen_fehlende_geburten.pdf

Increased sex ratio in Bavaria (Germany):
after Chernobyl and in the vicinity of Nuclear Power Plants -
epidemiological findings: http://www.tschernobylkongress.de/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/Koerblein_sexratio.pdf

What meaning might lie behind it? Fewer women means fewer people. Nuclear power is probably an instrument to curb population growth

http://www.odwac.gov.on.ca/standards_review/tritium/Tritium_Radiation_Risks_Additional_Note_for_ODWAC_Fairlie.pdf – quote: “Background radiation is also the primary reason why women aged over ~40 are
advised not to have children. This is because their stocks of ova have been exposed since birth to 40 or so years’ background radiation and have thereby been damaged to such an extent that an unacceptable proportion, when fertilised, results in congenital malformations, spontaneous abortions or stillbirths. Many scientists also consider that background radiation is the prime factor in the ageing process, and is ultimately the reason why we are not immortal.” PAGE 5

Another effect is observed in Belarus: oligospermia. In Japan there will be infertility risk – an attack on human race: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9lyxgJhc0c

Population control through nuclear pollution – by John W. Gofman – former ICRP scientist: http://books.google.de/books?id=gjIzAAAAMAAJ&q=gofman+tamplin&dq=gofman+tamplin&hl=de&ei=2SE8TszrF8Wx8gOYsJScAw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CC4Q6AEwAQ

“It is important to study the effect of low-level irradiation at the population level /in an exposed human population the number of people whose blood cells do not give an adaptive response to subsequent exposures has increased / it was shown that 15 generations of cells irradiated with the doses 10 to 50 cGy (100 to 500 milli Gray) “remember” the irradiation and respond to external stimuli differently than the control.” PAGE 60 http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/chernobylebook.pdf

Juri Dubrova created children DNA fingerprints and compared their data with the DNA profile of British children who had lived on non irradiated region. The results of the study: the higher the soil contamination by cesium-137, the higher the mutation rate in a genomic fragment:  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC378537/

Published in 1990 by Martin Gardner and Eve Roman, a study in which they examined the fathers of children with leukemia. They found: These fathers worked at Sellafield before “making” children and were exposed to radiation. The higher their dose was, the greater the risk was for their children to develop leukemia. Maximum: 5 mSv per year (Japan 20 mSv per year) repost: http://www.jstor.org/pss/29718787

Louise Parker in 1999 published a paper in which she examined primarily stillbirth in the “radiation workers” who work in a nuclear plant. She registered 9,208 births – among them were 130 stillbirths. The result of Parker’s study is appalling: When “producers” were irradiated 24 percent more stillbirths occured than of non-irradiated. (repost) http://www.lancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2899%2904138-0/abstract

http://www.euradcom.org/publications/chernobylebook.pdf

quotes from PAGE 17: Examples of occurrence of some solid cancers cases as a direct result of the
Chernobyl catastrophe

“Retinoblastoma A 2-fold increase in cases between
1987 and 1990 in the eye microsurgical
center in Minsk, Belarus”

“Lung A 4-fold increase among 32 000 evacuees, than on the Belarus’ average”

“Intestines, Colon, Kidneys, Lungs, Mammary, glands, Bladder An increase in the Gomel area (Belarus), correlated with a level of the Chernobyl radioactive pollution”

All cancers in children
Exceeds up to 15 times in 1995-1996
compared with the period 1968 – 1987
in Lipetsk city, Russia:

“In the 11 yr period after the catastrophe, for the most polluted areas, rates (13,1 – 17,1 per 100,000 were higher than the Russian average (10,5)”

“Exceeds the average across Belarus by 3,7 – 3,1 times for the evacuated children and those living in the polluted regions”

“Exceeded by 20 times in 1994 in the Gomel area (heavy polluted), than in the less polluted Vitebsk area, Belarus Bogdanovich”

See the statistics of Belarus, of villages with a 10 km distance to Chernobyl: More boys with defomities than girls – because less girls are born (?):

And the declining birth rates among belarusians under the age of 30 will – declared by the IAEA with “Radiophobia”:

http://www.iaea.org/inis/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/28/073/28073803.pdf – quote “2. PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACTS OF NUCLEAR ACCIDENTS : Soon after the discovery of ionizing radiation, it was realized that radiation could harmfully affect skin tissues, body organs and the human body as a whole beside the genetic effects. Lately after the drop of the first atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki and also after Three-Miles-Island and Chernobyl accidents anew phenomenon described as RADIOPHOBIA have become apparent and widely spread..” PAGE 338

It now seems logical that the World Health Organisation WHO is gagged by the International Advertising Agency for Atomic Energy IAEA:

http://www.independentwho.info – quote: “on 28th May 1959,
,WHO signed Agreement WHA 12-40 with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
which prevents WHO taking any initiative or action to achieve its objectives:the preservation and the improvement of health.“:

An analysis of the action taken by WHO in response to radioactive contamination,
from the start of the nuclear age up to the present day shows this quite clearly:

By Michel Fernex former member of Steering Committees of Scientific working groups on malaria
and filariasis, WHO Geneva: http://www.independentwho.info/Documents/M_Fernex/ChernobylCatastrophe_Fernex_EN.pdf – quote: “As long as the World Health Assembly, the governing body of the WHO, does not amend the Agreement, concluded in 1959 with the IAEA, which holds it hostage to the nuclear lobby with regard to the radiation induced health effects, there is no hope for independent
research groups to receive any substantial support.” PAGE 10

and:

http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/05/19/german-greens-cancel-secret-gag-agreement-between-iaea-and-w-h-o/ – quote: “The over “decades” secret agreement “of 1959 regulates that making studies of radiation effects made by WHO are in consultation with the IAEA. From the perspective of the Atomic Energy Authority Members therefore take decisive influence on the health assessment of nuclear disasters, without a mandate or have sufficient expertise and independence. The main objectives of both organizations were in an “irreconcilable conflict”- here to promote the peaceful use of nuclear power, where the goal of “all nations and people to achieve the best possible health help. “

If radiation from nuclear power plants would have a color, we would understand.

There are Errors in conventional (ICRP) risk models for radiation limits:

http://www.atomkongress.de/z_folien_busby.pdf - quote: “The errors in the ICRP model arise from failure to see that there are differences in
the cell doses from internal and external irradiation, between some man made and all
natural isotopes and because of the existence of new types of exposure to particles.” PAGE 1

This has full effect on unborn and even un-made human life!

More: quote by IPPNW / PSR (nobel peace proze 1985):

What we need is a “reference embryo” to replace the “reference man”.
In 1974, the ICRP created the “reference man”, a hypothetical construct of a young, healthy white man in North America or Europe, aged 25-30, weighting 154 pounds, 5 feet 7 inches high. This is the base for the existing radiation protection. It is assumed that his immune system is in full working order and his cell repair mechanisms work well. These assumptions don’t do justice to the situation of our children born in the vicinity of nuclear power plants. In the IPPNW-Petition for an advanced radiation protection (July 2009),
we ask the German Bundestag to replace the obsolete “reference man” by the more sensitive “reference embryo”. Until August 2010, 4100 people joined this petition. The German Bundestag did not yet respond to our claims.

We know the truth since 1927 (!): 1927 Herman J Mueller discovered in 1927 (!) the following: ARTIFICIAL TRANSMUTATION OF THE GENE by radiation – he got the The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1946: http://www.esp.org/foundations/genetics/classical/holdings/m/hjm-1927a.pdf

When people over years and decades are exposed to chronic low-level radiation their tolerance  to low-level radiation as a whole is reduced. One speaks of Chernobyl-Aids in Belarus. The effect is as follows: The free radicals caused by the slow dose / low radiation are sparsely distributed radicals do have a higher chance to reach the cell membranes. The low electric charge of the cell membranes attract the free radicals in the early state of the reaction (minor total dose). If the harmed cells are monocytes – this will cause:

Weakened immune system in the cells, because the monocytes generate the substance which activates the immune system of the lymphocytes.

This is the so called “Bura Bura” – of Hiroshima and Nagasaki survivors.

Large sections of the population can therefore be turned off easily.

quote by Dr. Rosalia Bertell, November 1999 issue of The Ecologist, pp. 408-411: http://ratical.org/radiation/NAvictims.html

The main way in which the “radiation protection industry” has succeeded in hugely underrating the ill-health caused by nuclear power is by insisting on a group of extremely restrictive definitions as to what qualifies as a radiation-caused illness statistic. For example, under IAEA’s criteria:

>    If a radiation-caused cancer is not fatal, it is not counted in the IAEA’s figures

>    If a cancer is initiated by another carcenogen, but accelerated or promoted by exposure to radiation, it is not counted.

>    If an auto-immune disease or any non-cancer is caused by radiation, it is not counted.

>    Radiation-damaged embryos or foetuses which result in miscarriage or stillbirth do not count

>    A congenitally blind, deaf or malformed child whose illnesses are are radiation-related are not included in the figures because this is not genetic damage, but rather is teratogenic, and will not be passed on later to the child’s offspring.

>    Causing the genetic predisposition to breast cancer or heart disease does not count since it is not a “serious genetic disease” in the Mendelian sense.

>    Even if radiation causes a fatal cancer or serious genetic disease in a live born infant, it is discounted if the estimated radiation dose is below 100 mSv [mSv= millisievert, a measurement of radiation exposure. One hundred millsievert is the equivalent in radiation of about 100 X-Rays].

>    Even if radiation causes a lung cancer, it does not count if the person smokes — in fact whenever there is a possibility of another cause, radiation cannot be blamed.

>    If all else fails, it is possible to claim that radiation below some designated dose does not cause cancer, and then average over the whole body the radiation dose which has actually been received by one part of the body or even organ, as for instance when radio-iodine concentrates in the thyroid. This arbitrary dilution of the dose will ensure that the 100 mSv cut-off point is nowhere near reached. It is a technique used to dismiss the sickness of Gulf War veterans who inhaled small particles of ceramic uranium which stayed in their lungs for more than two years, and in their bodies for more than eight years, irradiating and damaging cells in a particular part of the body.

war is going on.

It was made publicly known in 1953 when President Dwight D. Eisenhower declared war upon every citizen and human being with “The Peaceful Atom”. It was then further developed in 1954 with the first hydrogen bomb testing which changed the most important international program for radiation protection and compensation: THE ALARA PRINCIPLE: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/03/21/iaea-and-icrp-the-alara-principle/, the h bomb testing is the successor to the Hiroshima / Nagasaki testing (!). The BASE for ALL RADIATION LIMITS is the T65D Study (Tentative Dose Estimate compiled in 1965): http://www.rerf.or.jp/glossary_e/t65d.htm For validation of this study the US even did an atomic test in Nevada: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/212/4497/900.extract

The indirect chemical damage to cell membranes in the low dose range is much more important than the direct effect of radiation on the nucleus with its genetic material. In the nucleus there appears to be much stronger repair mechanisms than in the cell membranes. This is consistent with the purposes of evolution: Increasingly higher development of life. First and foremost, namely the genes in the nucleus had greatly developed by repair mechanisms to be protected. Only then could the nature of the gene pool protect itself against the highly damaging properties of natural radiation, and thus maintain the relative stability of species over millions of years.

Sources:

> Petkau A. Effects of 22 Na + on phospholipid membrane injury to irradiated erythrocytes. Radiation Research 1968, 34:335-346.
>Sternglass EJ. Implication of dose-rate dependent cell-membrane damage for the biological effets of medical and environmental radiation. Proceedings of the symposium on population exposures, Knoxville TN, October 21-23, 1974. (CONF-741 018)

But in contrast to the gene pool, individual members of populations (plants, animals, people) for the evolution are not so important to the contrary, her constant death and her replacement by reproduction is an important evolutionary process. The repair mechanisms in the cell membranes were needed, but weren’t  so important, because you only caused diseases, but no genetic defects. And if one member of a population has fulfilled its evolutionary role of reproduction, sit is no longer needed, so a life extension beyond the reproductive age is also not absolutely necessary. This is for the survival of animals and plant species are not necessarily problematic, however, for human society. Each individual hopes to a long and healthy life, far beyond reproduction age. In addition, an adaptation to environmental toxic substances in humans is not possbile, because of the generational change phaes which are very long. But we add more radiation by atomic energy with it’s low radiation emission, accidents, catastrophes – which are peeks.

regards,

Life-Upgrade.com

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 83 other followers