Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘ICRP’ Category

qrcode

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

First of all:
Herman J Mueller discovered in 1927 (!) the following: ARTIFICIAL TRANSMUTATION OF THE GENE by radiation.

SOURCE: http://www.esp.org/foundations/genetics/classical/holdings/m/hjm-1927a.pdf he got the The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1946: – he got the The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1946:

Second:

The W.H.O. has a gag agreement with IAEA since 1959: http://mondediplo.com/2008/04/14who

Full article in german newsmag “TAZ”:

http://www.taz.de/1/zukunft/umwelt/artikel/1/radioaktive-strahlung-immer-gefaehrlich/

and: “Nuclear Threat Draws WHO and Civil Society Closer” http://www.independentwho.info/Presse_ecrite/11_05_05_IPS_EN.pdf and: http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/article1766914.ece?homepage=true and: http://www.independentwho.info/Presse_ecrite/11_04_27_IPS_EN.pdf in german: http://www.woz.ch/artikel/2011/nr15/international/20607.html 

and Info by the IPPNW (peace nobel price 1985): http://www.ippnw.de/commonFiles/pdfs/Atomenergie/who_letter_chan.pdf

IAEA-WHO 協定 (1959 年): http://www.crms-jpn.com/doc/IAEA-WHO1959.pdf

Русский / English / Deutsch / Castellano / Français:  http://www.independentwho.info

One of the most important News for the anti nuclear movement: http://independentwho.info/OMS-IW_2011-05-04_FR.php

Source WHO

I rushed the article through a google translator, sorry:

Radiation always dangerous

So far, the WHO took always the same heading as the IAEA: So-called internal radiation, “in the body is enriched, not dangerous. This is now over.

“There is no safe low levels of radiation, ” said WHO Director General Margaret Chan on Wednesday during a short meeting scheduled with members of the critical “initiative for an independent WHO “. By the former Ukrainian, Russian and Western European doctors and radiation biologists, and WHO staff based initiative has been demonstrating daily about four years before the WHO Office for cancellation of the agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

So far, the WHO had always taken the position specified by the IAEA, radioactive radiation below certain limits is NOT dangerous. Chan was referring in her testimony to the internal radiation from radioactive particles – such as Iodine 131, Cesium 137, Strontium 90, plutonium – they are being absorbed through food, water or air into the body and are deposited in the thyroid, bones or internal organs and continue radiation.

These particles are, after numerous studies by independent scientists who carried out since the nuclear disaster at Chernobyl in April 1986, responsible for up to 95 percent of all cancers caused by radiation and genetic changes. The WHO has denied the internal radiation up to today, and in all statements regarding potential health risks only to external radiation – based and related measurements with the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 – for example by a passing by radioactive cloud.

Chan distanced himself from Chernobyl sayings of the WHO

Chan distanced itself from the recent statements made by the WHO on the consequences of Chernobyl. “I personally do not believe that the nuclear accident in Chernobyl has claimed only 50 lives,” WHO Director-General said, according to transcripts of the interview with the critic initiative. In accordance with the IAEA, the WHO official said today, as a result of the Chernobyl disaster were only 52 people died and irradiated up to 6,000 more infected with thyroid cancer. These figures also took over the UN Commission of Atomic Scientists, and finally published in February this year.

Notwithstanding the correction of previous positions Chan insisted on and got to look at the current nuclear disaster in Fukushima “fully recognized its responsibility,” the WHO. And this “without restriction by the bilateral agreements with the IAEA in 1959.” Chan defended against the critics, too, that the WHO has to date the results of measurement to Fukushima under wraps, she and the IAEA regularly receives from the international authority to monitor agreements on nuclear weapons test ban (CTBTO). The world’s 80 monitoring stations of the CTBTO to register around the clock, the radioactivity in the atmosphere.

WHO has, however, Fukushima-measurement results under wraps

The “Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics (ZAMG) in Vienna, which also has access to the measurement results of the CTBT0, presented at the end of fixed March with a significantly higher leakage of radioactivity from Fukushima, when the Japanese authorities – based on their data, the WHO and the IAEA – publicly announced. Chan said the WHO would be the CTBTO measurement data “publish only if it’s dangerous values.” If that was the case, they decide “alone”.

At the same time admitted the Director-General, that “no expert on radiation,” and that the WHO “on this issue today almost at all has not within the jurisdiction more.” The Department of Radiobiology at the Geneva WHO headquarters was closed two years ago under pressure from private and public donors. Earlier, the deputy head of the department with the attempt to impose lower limits for WHO Iodine intake failed on objections by the IAEA and France: http://www.chernobylcongress.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/Baverstock_How_the_UN_works.pdf

WHO hushed Chernobyl Conference documents

Today in the WHO Geneva headquarters, only a single radiation biologist. Chan said the “Initiative for an independent WHO” to “investigate what happened to the documents of 2001, organized jointly with the IAEA Chernobyl conference in Kiev,” she wanted. So far, the WHO claims falsely that the documents had been published in full.

In fact, only a brief summary was published. Of the more than 700 documents of the first Chernobyl conference, conducted in 1995 jointly by WHO and IAEA in Geneva, have been published to date, only twelve. The IAEA had prevailed, citing the agreement with the WHO, the then WHO Director-General Nakashima been confirmed in a television interview.

Sixty-fourth World Health Assembly being held from May 16th till 24th 2011: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/events/2011/wha64/en/index.html

Press Article of the Federal Working Agency “For the Children of Chernobyl” Germany / Belarus: http://life-upgrade.com/Genf-Minsk-2011.pdf

INTERNAL Radiation exposure to plant workers in Fukushima:
http://mdn.mainichi.jp/mdnnews/news/20110521p2a00m0na021000c.html

FOX NEWS and PSR say also NO SAFE RADIATION LIMITS: http://www.foxnews.com/health/2011/06/29/radiation-in-our-food/

The National Academies of Science says All Levels of Radiation Confirmed to Cause Cancer: http://www.nirs.org/press/06-30-2005/1

More:

How nuclear apologists mislead the world over radiation, by Dr. Helen Caldicott: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/apr/11/nuclear-apologists-radiation

Keith Baverstock, PhD, a graduate of London University, led the Radiation Protection Programme at the World Health Organisation’s Regional Office for Europe from 1991 to 2003. His critical views of the management and conduct of the Committee, particularly in its failure to make proper use of science and its lack of adherence to the Code of Conduct in Public Life, resulted in his dismissal – more information: http://www.chernobylcongress.org/speakers/artikel/2cc0de2cee21dc8506748b53a7d…

His presentation: How the UN / WHO / IAEA work: “How the UN works: “know thine enemy” or at least who it is.” http://www.chernobylcongress.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/Baverstock_How_the_UN_works.pdf

Mainichi newspaper has become the first newsaper in Japan which has reported about the IAEA-WHO gag order and that the WHO abolished the department of radiation health specialist. It mentioned the NGO “for the independence of WHO”: http://mainichi.jp/select/today/news/20110918k0000m030124000c.html?inb=tw info by Izumi Toshiosdóttir

WHO: abolish the department of radiation health specialist

September 18, 2011

World Health Organization United Nations specialized agencies (WHO), and abolished the department of radiation health specialist for two years ago, found that there are no plans to revive in the future due to financial difficulties. May, the WHO Director General Margaret Chan, the top sought after and investigating health hazards due to nuclear accident TEPCO Fukushima 1 WHO, European non-governmental organization (NGO) organization of 40 organizations contacted about “independence of the WHO For “approved by meeting with representatives.
Concurrently promoting the primary criticism of the leadership ◇ IAEA

Leadership of the investigation, such as health damage caused by nuclear Since 1959, International Atomic Energy Agency WHO (IAEA) has been been moved to the IAEA in the agreement entered into with, the NGO is “IAEA (after the accident, Fukushima) country While seeking to isolate and monitor promotion of nuclear power, which also serve both their own, there is a conflict, “such as criticism, have pointed out the limitations of the current international nuclear monitoring system.

According to WHO, were abolished, the Health Department’s headquarters was in charge of radiation and nuclear effects on the human body. In 2009, after the resignation of the director was suspected of collusion with industry, the organization itself has been dismantled. The current staff expertise in radiation damage is not only one, department from budget cuts planned resurrection, he said.

WHO is in agreement with the IAEA was established in 1959 to promote the peaceful use of nuclear energy. Without the consent of the IAEA is constrained such that their own work-related issues of primary health. Soviet nuclear accident in Chernobyl 88 years old after 1986, when a nuclear accident and the IAEA concluded that two new treaties, such as a state that corresponds to head the IAEA. Also in 2005, has led the IAEA additional issue of food imports and exports of radioactive material contaminated with the chemical.

The NGO is, has been criticized reason not been able global discovery is still health of the Chernobyl accident is weak authority survey of WHO, in the study health in Japan, the active involvement of UN agencies are expected to It is not reality.

In contrast, the WHO spokesman for the agreement with the IAEA “as well as WHO, UN specialized agencies are all similar as far as the nuclear relationship,” while indicating the recognition of de facto subordination in the “There is more radiation research group creating a healthy environment in the sector,” he said. “International Agency for Research on Cancer of the Chernobyl accident for subordinate agency (IARC, Lyon, France headquarters) are continuing to research and six regional offices,” said survey system was being maintained.

WHO in 2005 for the victims of Chernobyl 20 years after the accident investigation as a result “56 people dead and about 4,000 cancer deaths estimated in the future,” said. In contrast, such NGO is “too low compared to reality,” and criticized. The WHO has also admitted that plans for the re-survey of global discovery so far has not. This is the NGO “forced attention to the IAEA because of promoting nuclear power” has been pointed out.

<Whotoiaea>, WHO cooperation agreements with the United Nations’ specialized agency, “one. The IAEA 結Bazu a partnership agreement with the United Nations, the organization has independently and report to the General Assembly and Security Council “relevant agencies”. Hierarchical relationship of the two organizations have no authority in the organization.

◇ WHO and IAEA conventions list

<1959 agreement>

Article 1 Section 2 · “WHO, for use in research and development for peaceful use of nuclear energy around the world acknowledge that you do basically the IAEA”

Article 7 · “WHO and the IAEA, to avoid unnecessary duplication of their activities”

Article 12 Section 1 – “The two institutions could raise their agreement to fix”

<1986 “Convention on Early Notification Assistance nuclear accident 2″ (WHO was ratified in 1988)>

• The nuclear accident occurred when, standing at the top of the international response IAEA, other international organizations, to support this assertion only when there is demand and acceptance of relevant government

<2005 “International Health Regulations,” revised>

• The crisis management rules originally intended for infectious disease control. Apply to issues such as import and export of products contaminated with chemical substances such as radioactive

Article 6 – “When was the problem areas related to the IAEA report had not, immediately report to the IAEA”



This is a result of our peace tour, which also took place with Chernobyl childern in Geneva, at the United Nations Office, with members of the W.H.O. (Dr. Neira), on April 26th 2011:

 Chernobyl Peace tour through Europe April 2011

More background:

Website Independent WHO

BREAKING NEWS from May 21st 2011: U.N. launches study of Japan nuclear crisis

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20110520/wl_nm/us_japan_nuclear_un_1

New problems in Japan:

More radioactive water leaks into sea near stricken plant: http://www.asahi.com/english/TKY201105120188.html

Masks, sleeves in at Fukushima schools as radiation looms: http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20110512n1.html

Life-Upgrade.com

Read Full Post »


妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ


The belarusian government tries to “end” Chernobyl. As the japanese government tries to “end” Fukushima. With the support of the World Health Organisation, UNSCEAR, U.N. and the IAEA. In Belarus radiation signs are suspended. Villages reinterpreted as clean (since 2007 1000). Tolerance limits for nuclear contamination to be raised, as in Fukushima, as in the EU, March 2011. Standards for food, water, land can be reduced. While Fukushima exploded, the contract for the construction of the first Belarusian nuclear power plant was signed, although 72% of the Chernobyl fallout went down on Belarus. ROSATOM builds this reactor, just like in Iran. With the full support of fake humanitarian programs such as CORE (link) or international fake help programs: which only have one aim: To “end” Chernobyl – although it’s full effects are just starting to grow.

ICRP, WHO and IAEA say: External and internal radiation is the same – this is downplaying, neither is it ethic nor is it scientific valid.

World Health Organisation ignores all Fukushima and Chernobyl children – come to Geneva April 26th 2011

PART 1:

PART 2:

PART 3:

PART 4:

PART 5:

PART 6:

PART 7:

Life-Upgrade.com

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

http://www.chernobylcongress.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/Baverstock_How_the_UN_works.pdf

http://www.chernobylcongress.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/nyagu.pdf

http://www.chernobylcongress.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/Koerblein_sexratio.pdf

The World Health Organisation is gagged by the Atomic Energy Association IAEA with the contract WHA 12-40 from 1959.This is the reason why WHO and IAEA ignore all Fukushima and Chernobyl victims. End this scandal! Come to Geneva, on April 26th to protest – along with scientists, politicians, doctors and victims and liquidators: http://www.independentwho.info or http://www.tekknorg.wordpress.com or http://www.bag-tschernobyl.net

Video made by me

PART 1:

PART 2:

PART 3:

Keith Baverstock, PhD, a graduate of London University, led the Radiation Protection Programme at the World Health Organisation’s Regional Office for Europe from 1991 to 2003. His critical views of the management and conduct of the Committee, particularly in its failure to make proper use of science and its lack of adherence to the Code of Conduct in Public Life, resulted in his dismissal – more information: http://www.chernobylcongress.org/speakers/artikel/2cc0de2cee21dc8506748b53a7d…

WATCH THESE VIDEOS of HELEN CALDICOTT:

“Helen Caldicott has been my inspiration to speak out.” quotation Meryl Streep

PART 1

PART 2

PART 3

Dr. Helen Caldicott from http://www.beyondnuclear.org speaks about the fight against atomic bombs and atomic power, about her fight against atomic bomb tests. She has 19 honorary degrees, and got the Gandhi Prize. This is her speech during the IPPNW Chernobyl / Fukushima congress, from April 8th till 10th 2011. After the speech, I gave her a copy of my movie “The Time blurs the Truth” – about Chernobyl and Belarus.

More: http://www.tschernobylkongress.de/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/Baverstock_How_the_UN_works.pdf

Angelina Nyagu on Chernobyl Children part1 – April 9th, 2011, Berlin:

HERE IS HERE STUDY http://www.chernobylcongress.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/nyagu.pdf

Keith Baverstock said, that U.N. / IAEA / WHO ignore all russian studies, or all in russian language written studies. Such as the one by Prof. Jablokov, he shows in his study, that 1000,000 people died, the IAEA and WHO say for 25 years: 32 people died.

Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment

More about this scandal:

World Health Organisation ignores all Fukushima and Chernobyl children – Geneva April 26th 2011

Life-Upgrade.com

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

Video made by me

Part 1

Part 2

Prof. Dr. Irina Grushevaya was invited among others to the SPD fraction event “Tschernobyl Mahnt”, among the guests was the belarusian ambassador in Berlin, and the former german ambassador in Minsk. Grushevaya helped more than 2000.000 belarusians with concrete aid and sent more than 360,000 Chernobyl children in countries all over the world. More about her here: Prof. Dr. Irina Grushevaya on German TV and here: Offical Website 

About the Fund: http://www.civilsoc.org/nisorgs/belarus/chornbel.htm and: http://www.europaeische-bewegung.de/aktivitaeten-projekte/preis-frauen-europas/2011-irina-gruschewaja/

Book by the Fund: http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/BelarusianFundForTheChildrenOfChernobyl1996.pdf

VIDEO:

Life-Upgrade.com

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

The gag contract in action, between IAEA and WHO

quote from independentwho.info

The UN is divided into 7 organisations, of which two are of interest to us, the Economic and Social Council and the Security Council.The “Economic and Social Council” oversees ALL the United Nations agencies with the exception of the “IAEA”.

In fact, the IAEA is the only agency that reports directly to the “Security Council” which is made up of representatives of 15 countries, of which 5 are permanent members of the Council : the United States, the Untied Kingdom, the Russian Federation, China and France.

These 5 nations are all nuclear powers, both civil and military, and almost all are exporters of nuclear technology.
The 10 remaining members (or countries) have a mandate which lasts for 2 years.

The influence of these 5 permanent members of the Security Council on policy making within the IAEA is enormous and ongoing. With no counterbalancing power, it is almost impossible to claim that the IAEA has an objective view of the nuclear industry and the consequences of its use.

On 28th May 1959, the IAEA (not yet two years old !) and WHO signed an agreement referred to as “WHA 12-40” which, though it might, on paper, appear balanced and reciprocal, in practice, puts WHO in a subordinate position to the IAEA.

From this day on all information policy by the media, the ministeries, the universites and commissions is directly affected by that. We’ve seen it happening with Chernobyl and now during Fukushima.


The UNSCEAR (web) informs the UN General Assembly about the latest on policy and research of the IAEA. The members of the UNSCEAR serve the interests of their national governments, most of which have nuclear programs. These must be protected, not the victims of Chernobyl or Fukushima.

This small group of scientists have full control over politics, and on the recognition that research is paid off, which could perhaps be a threatto  their results and decisions.

All submissions that are not consistent with the recommendations and the policy of the Board are stamped as ignorant, emotional, not scientific.

All international U.N. organisation will ignore the fate of the Fukushima children, as they did with the Chernobyl children.


From: “Le Monde diplomatique, March 14th 2008, by Alison Katz):

- The Protocols of the UN Chernobyl Conference in 1995 were never made ​​public.

- Until 2008, By 2008, W.H.O. spokesman Gregory Haertl claimed the opposite – this is his contact data:

Gregory Härtl
Team Leader, Communications for Global Alert and Response (GAR)
World Health Organization

- Only summaries of the protocols have been published, 12 of a few hundreds.

- Every study, every statement or action by the WHO, if in connection with radioactivity and health, must be authorized by the IAEA

- The IAEA has no mandate for this. The IAEA has no mandate for reactor safety or human health.

- The IAEA is not contracted by the UN to organize relief efforts for nuclear accidents.

- 1991: Rather than examine genetic defects due to Chernobyl, the WHO examined Caries in the Chernobyl affected countries

- Behind the IAEA is the military-industrial complex

The IAEA is the spokesman of the five permanent members of the U.N.: China, USA, France, England, Russia – all atomic weapons countries. All with VETOs infront of the U.N. Vetos against all Chernobyl studies.

POST IT ON:
Facebook
Twitter
Wordpress

It’s up to us!

Press, media, scientitsts, journalists, students from all over Europe will be there, in Geneva, on April 26th 2011!

Why keeps the W.H.O. it’s mouth shut and let’s the IAEA say: “Chernobyl is not a big problem, Fukushima is soon over (?).”

W.H.O. is gagged by the contract WHA 12-40 from 1959, made with the IAEA. W.H.O. is not allowed to makes statements about radation sickness, cancer, mutation, death, leukemia. They simply deny it, because of this gag contract!

Here is an excellent clip from the Association for the Liquidators of Chernobyl:
http://soutienliquidateursetvictimestchernobyl.over-blog.org/article-s-69717539.html

WHO gagged by IAEA !!! – Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zkaafpOM2_k
I was in Geneva last year, wore the sign, Nesterenko (Atomic physicist and liquidator) has worn, 4 months before he died.

W.H.O. gagged by IAEA

Therefore: COME TO GENEVA, on April 26th 2011:

http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=3067&id=100002359176176#!/event.php?eid=205069419515925

http://bag-tschernobyl.net/projekte/263-26-april-2011-25-years-chernobyl.html
http://bag-tschernobyl.net/projekte/267-zeit-und-routenplan-friedensfahrt-minsk-genf.html
http://bag-tschernobyl.net/projekte/249-26april-2011-25-jahre-tschernobyl.html
http://bag-tschernobyl.net/projekte/262-le-26-avril-2011-25-ans-tchernobyl.html

The World Health Organisation is gagged by the Atomic Energy Association IAEA

Take immediate action against this scandal, go on http://bag-tschernobyl.net/projekte/263-26-april-2011-25-years-chernobyl.html come to Geneva on April 26th 2011!

The actions of the responsible Secretaries and Directors General of International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the World Health Organization (WHO), the responsible operating company TEPCO and regulators after the reactor accident of Fukushima is a case for such a International Criminal Court: The IAEA, WHO and TEPCO should be a case for the International Criminal Courts

The definition of an accident is similar to what is known in Harvard as “strategic misinterpretation“. Quote of IAEA and OCDE: ““In consequence, the Chernobyl accident will be not considered as a significant accident.SOURCE Read here: Fukushima and Three Mile Island USA: strategic misinterpretation by the IAEA

Latency of Cesium 137: 20 – 25 years mature people / 4 years children (Chernobyl happens grows today, illness, death, cancer increase and not decrease, as WHO and IAEA say): Japanese officals and WHO ignore irradiated Japanese Children

By the ALARA principle you have to prove that the money you are going to spent to lower the radiation exposure does advance peoples health. This was told the IAEA by the ICRP and so the IAEA told this all atomic agencies in the world.: IAEA and ICRP – Licence to Kill – ALARA principle

Tell the people, that Fukushima is not as bad as Chernobyl, and, Chernobyl was a small accident: Fukushima: The IAEA strategy

If the people of Tokio would be exposed a radiation dose of 0.1 Sv (100 mSv): In the coming years 235,000 cancer cases would be created. 400 mSv could create over a million cases: Japan: Additional 252,500 Cancer Cases and Risk for pregnant women

After the accident has technically ended begins the social accident, begins the humanitarian accident, begins the health accident – like in Chernobyl: 25 Years with FUKUSHIMA

Le Monde, August 28th 1986: “Because of the importance of this energy, the world could endure each year an accident in the order of Chernobyl…” – Hans Blix – former IAEA director: Atomic Industry – Licence to Kill

In May 2008,  the belarusian Government struck off 1000 villages and communities from the list of contaminated areas: CORE – a Chernobyl aid program that kills

Why keeps the W.H.O. it’s mouth shut and let’s the IAEA say: “Chernobyl is not a big problem, Fukushima is soon over (?).”

W.H.O. is gagged by the contract WHA 12-40 from 1959, made with the IAEA. W.H.O. is not allowed to makes statements about radation sickness, cancer, mutation, death, leukemia. They simply deny it, because of this gag contract!

Here is an excellent clip from the Association for the Liquidators of Chernobyl:
http://soutienliquidateursetvictimestchernobyl.over-blog.org/article-s-69717539.html

WHO gagged by IAEA !!! – Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zkaafpOM2_k
I was in Geneva last year, wore the sign, Nesterenko (Atomic physicist and liquidator) has worn, 4 months before he died.

Therefore: COME TO GENEVA, on April 26th 2011:

http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=3067&id=100002359176176#!/event.php?eid=205069419515925

http://bag-tschernobyl.net/projekte/263-26-april-2011-25-years-chernobyl.html
http://bag-tschernobyl.net/projekte/267-zeit-und-routenplan-friedensfahrt-minsk-genf.html
http://bag-tschernobyl.net/projekte/249-26april-2011-25-jahre-tschernobyl.html
http://bag-tschernobyl.net/projekte/262-le-26-avril-2011-25-ans-tchernobyl.html

Here are my clips of the IPPNW Chernonyl / Fukushima congress, April 8th – 10th, 2011 – mostly in english but partly also in german language:

Dr. Helen Caldicott on Atomic bombs and Atomic reactors – April 9th 2011, Berlin:
PART 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NpHrBawqQtQ
PART 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FW1W3ZnaSyE
PART 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zj2tkeESUeQ
Helen Caldicott has received many awards for her work, including 19 honourary doctrates, the Gandhi Prize and she was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize by Nobel Peace Laureate Linus Pauling. In the last 30 years, Helen Caldicott – a paediatrician from Australia – has dedicated her life to international campaigns against the medical dangers and health effects of the nuclear age.

PART 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUxnnCmpOgw
PART 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyjpzkwmAM4
Prof. Dr. Angelina Nyagu directed the national research programme on reducing health effects of the Chernobyl catastrophe in Ukraine and the former Soviet Union as a specialist on neuropsychology, neurophysiology and radiation medicine.
Here is the truth of rising deaths and cancer among Children because of Chernobyl:
http://www.chernobylcongress.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/nyagu.pdf

The Time blurs the Truth:
PART 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kf2uaSfmYzo
PART 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxBzYCUPytM
PART 3:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ShAb7kH9FqA
4 other parts are coming…

Keith Baverstock — World Health Organisation and IAEA — April 9th 2011, Berlin:
PART 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQZr8jbiGH0
PART 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YesWK0gKCdM
PART 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R9JWgs1Dq9E

Keith Baverstock, PhD, a graduate of London University, led the Radiation Protection Programme at the World Health Organisation’s Regional Office for Europe from 1991 to 2003. His critical views of the management and conduct of the Committee, particularly in its failure to make proper use of science and its lack of adherence to the Code of Conduct in Public Life, resulted in his dismissal.
More additional information:
http://www.independentwho.info
and here:
http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/04/17/video-keith-baverstock-world-health-organisation-and-iaea-april-9th-2011-berlin/

Dr. Katsumi Furitsu on Fukushima / Radiation – April 9th 2011, Berlin:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qAH044RVNE8
Katsumi Furitsu, born 1959, holds a PhD on medical genetics and radiation biology of the Osaka University, Japan and at present works in the department of genetics at the Hyogo College of Medicine.

Prof. Alexey V. Jablokov on Chernobyl / 1000.000 deaths – April 9th 2011, Berlin:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7C0wZv462Ug
Prof. Alexey Jablokov and V. Nesterenko (liquidator and atomic physicist) released a 327 pages long study about Chernobyl (100 USD on amazon), which clearly shows, that 1000.000 people died of Chernobyl. Alexei V. Yablokov — Prof. Dr. Biol., councillor, Russian Academy of Science (1997-); corresponding member of Russian Academy of Sci. (1974- ); Deputy Chair, Comm. of Ecology of the USSR’ Parliament (1989-1991); councillor on ecology and public health, the President of the Russian Federation (1991-1993); chair., state comm. on dumping of radioactive wastes in seas surrounding the Russian Federation (1992 — 1993) His study:
http://books.google.de/books?id=g34tNlYOB3AC&printsec=frontcover&dq=chernobyl+consequences+of+the+catastrophe&hl=de&ei=yb2pTa7mDM2hOtCDxPcJ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CDgQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://www.tschernobylkongress.de/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/jablokov_opferzahlen_tschernobyl.pdf

Dr. Ian Fairlie “Fukushima worse than Chernobyl” – April 9th 2011, Berlin:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdlG0pwvfXA
Dr. Ian Fairlie is a radiobiologist from Great Britain. He works as an independent consultant in the field of radioactivity in the environment and advises environmental organisations, the European Parliament as well as local and national authorities in several countries. His study:
http://www.tschernobylkongress.de/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/fairlie.pdf

Prof. Dr. Irina Grushevaya on Chernobyl, Fukushima, Belarus – April 13th 2011, Berlin:
PART 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8GaNvkKhBk
PART 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TA-7y-iCnfE
Prof. Dr. Irina Grushevaya was invited among others to the SPD fraction event “Tschernobyl Mahnt”, among the guests was the belarusian ambassador in Berlin, and the former german ambassador in Minsk. Grushevaya helped more than 2000.000 belarusians with concrete aid and sent more than 200,000 Chernobyl children in countries all over the world.

VIDEO: Chernobyl Liquidator Vladimir Anatolevich Gudov, Berlin April 9th 2011:
PART 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnpP4lbmnAo
PART 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhpvTsrUrjA
Vladimir Anatolevich Gudov, Liquidator of Chernobyl, Special Battalion 731, author of the book “W.A. Gudow, Specbatal’on 731″ – during the Fukushima / Chernobyl IPPNW congress, in Berlin, from April 8th – 10th 2011.

FLASH MOB infront of CDU HQ in Berlin (pro atomic energy fraction and Government): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkkGbEoO1fc

Chernobyl 24: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPIx433cGgI

with kindest regards to the all Fukushima & Chernobyl children, women and Liquidators, and to Mr. Jablokov and Mr. Bandachevski (I mentioned your name on April 13th 2011 infront of the SPD fracton in the German “Bundestag”) “We were all fullof energy” – *quote Nesterenko
Here is a rare speech of Wladimir Nekljajew in Minsk:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CsIdN96bXOg

Life-Upgrade.com

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

Video made by me

IPPNW Chernobyl Congress from Apr 8th – 10th 2011: Prof. Alexey Jablokov and V. Nesterenko (liquidator and atomic physicist) released a 327 pages long study about Chernobyl (100 USD on amazon), which clearly shows, that 1000.000 people died of Chernobyl. This is ignored by the WHO and the IAEA – both share a gag contract, called WHA 12-40, made in 1959. Read all about this scandal on http://www.independentwho.info After that I had a small interview with him,with the help of Prof. Dr. Irina Grushevaya – Head of the belarusian fond for the Children of Chernobyl.

Here is his study:

Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment

by Alexey V. Yablokov,Vassily B. Nesterenko, Alexey V. Nesterenko

And here is his presentation http://www.tschernobylkongress.de/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/jablokov_opferzahlen_tschernobyl.pdf

Life-Upgrade.com

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

not only rain and waves, fish also. A 2nd catastrophe for Japan.

national meteorological and geophysical services in Austria LIVE MAP Cesium 137 release

Radiation Chart (probably down played and manipulated)

TEPCO radiation measurements – updated (probably down played and manipulated)

Quake and Radiation graphs

Readings at Monitoring Post out of 20 Km Zone of Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP (probably down played and manipulated)

ENVIROMENTAL RADIATION MEASUREMENT RESULTS

Technical Briefing of nuclear safety aspects of the situation in Japan

Quake tracker Map Japan

Casualties (probably down played and manipulated)

Life-Upgrade.com

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 80 other followers