Archive for the ‘electricity price’ Category


Belarus and Russia signed the construction contract of the first Belarusian nuclear reactor while Fukushima exploded:


ROSATOM – The Builder of Chernobyl RBMK builds the VVER reactor in Ostrovets, Belarus. Here is an overview: “radionuclides content in the soil samples taken at the Ostrovets site is within the following limits:

- Cesium-137 – 1,0 – 2,5 kBq/m2 (0,027 – 0,067 CU/km2)

- Strontium-90 – 0,17 – 0,37 kBq/m2 (0,005 – 0,01 CU/km2)

- Plutonium-238,239,240 – 0,026 – 0,074 kBq/m2 (0,0007 – 0,002 CU/km2)” http://www.wien.gv.at/umweltschutz/bekanntmachungen/pdf/belarus-kurzueberblick.pdf

following radionuclides in the
underground waters is possible:
tritium Cwa.rel (max) = 220 – 510 in 4 – 6 years;
strontium-90 Cwa.rel (max) = 760 – 7600 in 90 – 150 years;
Iodine-129 Cwa.rel (max) = 3,7 – 4.4 in 20 years;
technetium-99 Cwa.rel (max) = 2,9 – 4,5 in 6 – 10 years. http://www.wien.gv.at/umweltschutz/bekanntmachungen/pdf/belarus-ueberblick.pdf

Belarus believes that after 6 to 10 years of construction, the electricity from the nuclear power plant Ostrovets can be sold to the E.U. This is extremely naive.

Neither the construction nor the maintenance nor the operation nor the fuel cycle is self controlled by Belarus. It’s totally owned by Russia and it’s company ROSATOM.

update: New aggreement between ROSATOM and BELARUS, Oct. 11th 2011:


This is the reactor type: http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:trKxzd3OPuUJ:atomeromu.hu/download/1675/AES%25202006%2520reaktor.pdf+AES-2006+design+reactor&hl=de&gl=de&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEEShuZ1o2mzFCm_Ct7ckD9Q7GHVa8bgg0HiSczPjYEjfTXChDvS5dY8XPfhZzool6BW5tBqHaNdoJwQoGbOtepjK6ImHwLJYqNv1eajLKE06SylZQ4hXV6wvjhYLjcK4eZ2jy4fYw&sig=AHIEtbRrhYZsjEMwNSY-G2F5OFdEWZh8Wg&pli=1


Anti Nuclear in Belarus, SUMMARY: http://vk.com/club25156154

The interest-free loan from Russia in the amount of 2 billion €uro is only a beginning. Exactly from this moment on the hyperinflation began:


Like in Olkiluoto, where AREVA started to build it’s european EPR Reactor in 2005: Costs exploded (the bavarian bank of Germany gave 2 billion €uro and lost it. In 2005: 2 billion €uro, then 3, then 4 and 5 billion €uros), german Company SIEMENS left catastrophe operator AREVA alone, because of this. Now, Finland owns a ruined construction site with an incomplete junk reactor buildinghttp://www.greenpeace.org/international/Global/international/planet-2/report/2009/2/epr-the-french-reactor.pdf other genius actions by AREVA: irradiating state Niger in Africa: http://www.greenpeace.org/international/Global/international/publications/nuclear/2010/AREVA_Niger_report.pdf

NOW Belarus is transforming into a 2nd generation of some kind of Atomic State (Before: Chernobyl, Now: Reactor). Which means everyone who speaks against atomic power is an enemy of the state. New developments are under way: Belarusian officials detain over 450 after rally: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5ht93_cpV6vNi4Z5PsSGCiTOtxLGQ?docId=e6806b5fd8b240bbae405d2bfd098e74&index=0

More photos: http://toxaby.livejournal.com/514571.html?view=11193611

Russian activists released from jail after protesting against the new belarusian reactor: http://www.anti-atom.ru/en/node/1301

After leaving Areva, SIEMENS (web) cooperates with ROSATOM (web) – the russian concern, which started building the first Belarusian atomic reactor. Belarus is the most Chernobyl affected country in the world. Still more than 2 million people are living in contaminated areas there. Russia is also involved in the construction of Iranian atomic reactors. SIEMENS – what have you done? Source HERE - more about the Belarusian reactor HERE

The same costs explosion will happen in Belarus with ROSATOM and Ostrovets

Areva is building six EPR reactors in the earthquake area and nature reserve in India Jaitapur:


The EPR reactor architecture has 3000 safety flaws, according to Le Monde, March 2011 and to this factsheet:



Siemens is now a partner of ROSATOM.

ROSATOM was kicked out by Civil Society in India: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/energy/power/no-nuclear-power-plant-at-haripur-west-bengal-government/articleshow/9636544.cms

Another indian success: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/energy/power/no-nuclear-power-plant-at-haripur-west-bengal-government/articleshow/9636544.cmst

plane crash which “killed” ROSATOM experts: http://web.archive.org/web/20110626072754/http://arabnews.com/middleeast/article460576.ece

ROSATOM denies involvment in Litvinenko assasination: http://rt.com/politics/rosatom-russia-polonium-litvinenko/

ROSATOM builds the two atomic reactors in IRAN: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/16/world/middleeast/16stuxnet.html

Tell me, is it clever to let ROSATOM build an atomic reactor in Belarus?

ROSATOM (atomic reactor builder of Iran and Belarus) lost 5 nuclear scientists during plane crash: http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_theenvoy/20110623/ts_yblog_theenvoy/russian-nuclear-scientists-involved-with-iran-nuclear-facility-killed-in-plane-crash

Plus: the Ostrovets reator is build in a quake area according to the Kosmo Aero Geology Institute of Belarus / Minsk: http://www.kosmoaerogeology.by/

I and a german group visited them on June 16th 2011. Here are maps of the area:

ROSATOM is interested in working systems? No.

In Iran they wanted money and in Belarus ROSATOM is used by Russia as an instrument to take Belarus as hostage. For the next 6 – 10 years Russia and Belarus officials are going to stop democratic changes in Belarus. They are starting a war against their own people.

But the pupils of Belarus have other ideas: http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/Windenergy-Belarus-Luninetz_June2011.rar

Belarus has all the information Japan needs! http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/07/03/belarus-has-all-the-information-japan-needs/

But: Will Japan face the same fat as Belarus? http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/07/24/japan-goes-the-same-way-as-belarus-dictatorship-a-deep-insight/

Belarus loses his last piece of independence or independence in the perspective. And it’s autonomy will be lost also.
Lithuanian Geological Survey confirmed that the plant site is located on the Ostrovets tectonic break: http://ru.delfi.lt/news/live/geologicheskaya-sluzhba-ploschadka-ostroveckoj-aes-nahoditsya-na-tektonicheskom-razlome.d?id=47466545

Chernobyl’s Hostages: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/en/Novosti.html#Yr9904 – quote “What could they do in that situation? They made the most simplest decision – to return to the contaminated zones. Why? Because it is at least a week guarantee that they will have Chernobyl’s compensations for those remaining. For example, people living in zones of eviction have the right to receive 50 rubles per month (today it is about 2 USD). People working in that zones have rights to receive 300 rubles per month (it is about 12 USD). Taking into account that the average salary in Novozubkovo is 290 rubles per month, it is not difficult to imagine how such little money is important for the people.” More: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/en/Novosti.html

Lukashenko’s statements of “overcoming Chernobyl” can be found from page 47 on, http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub1001_web.pdf ONE DECADE AFTER
CHERNOBYL Summing up the Consequences of the Accident Proceedings of an International Conference Vienna, 8-12 April 1996

How much of the Russian electricity Belarus consumes, where it comes from. Will the Russians build a nuclear power plant in Belarus? TUT.BY-TV shows and interview with the director of the Russian National Energy Security Foundation (Moscow), Konstantin Simonov: http://news.tut.by/economics/233585.html

The IAEA promotes nuclear energy worldwide.

The IAEA is thus promoting the proliferation.

Because also in the “axis of evil states” (quote Bush Administration, USA) like Iran and Belarus, atomic energy programs are starting. The IAEA was in Minsk while the construction contract was signed.

So, the IAEA also delievers the reason to start war.

This is how it works:

  • 1st, the 2002 Nuclear Posture Review
  • 2nd, the National Security Strategies of 2002
  • 3rd, the 2006 National Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction

These 3 papers will be used as a reason to start a war.

Plus: The atomic facilities of Iran are underground.

Possible atomic attack against Iran is inevitable:


Belarus – the most irradiated Chernobyl country – can not only kill with radiation: http://livewire.amnesty.org/2011/09/26/end-the-death-penalty-in-belarus/langswitch_lang/en/



Read Full Post »


March 5th, 2009, Japan

A fire broke out in the biggest atomic power plant of the world: Kashiwazaki-Kariwa in Japan. One worker has been wounded in his face and is in hospital now. According to the operator Tokyo Electric Power (web) there was no danger for the reactor. The fire was fought 90 minutes long. Source

This is the atomic power plant: map

It is 140 miles north of Tokyo. A few weeks ago one of the seven reactors was online again because it has been heavily damaged during an earthquake in 2007. Read about it here

3,9 gallons of radioactive water were realesed then.

More atomic power accidents:

Uranium solution leaked out from French atomic power plant! – Operator: AREVA

Again! – Uranium leaked out from French atomic power plant! Operator: AREVA

100 French workers contaminated!

French atomic power plant: Worker contaminated with radiation – Again

never forget


Read Full Post »

Nov. 1st 2008. Germany, at the end of a German expert meeting of the Bavarian Government experts say, that the search for a new waste disposal not not fulfill inernational standards. Source

After scandals in the world’s first underground disposal for radioactive waste (see here: ASSE II Scandal News) Germany searches for a new disposal for atomic waste.

There are still NO defined safety regulations for atomic waste disposals in Germany, as Germany’s Environment minister Sigmar Gabriel said. AND there is not a single atomic waste disposal in the world. But we’re using atomic power for decades.

Germany needs a safe atomic waste disposal till 2035.

Some say “Gorleben” might be a good choice.

Although (You already know it) it doesn’s fulfill safety regulations (an international standard) – which do not exist in Germany.


Read Full Post »


Read Full Post »

Every atomic power plant has it’s own production price.
Operators / concerns sell their atomic power as expensive as possible.

For the electricity price the offerer is responsible, this means who can sell his electricity at the stock for the highest price. All other offeres oritentate by that, they even sell the cheapest electricity with this highest possible price.

So they make money. Take Germany’s E.ON for example:

E.ONs concern surplus 2007: 7,000,000,000 EUROs of money. This is 1,600,000,000 EUROs of money more than in 2006.

Atomic power is needed to hold electricity prices down? How’s that possible?

Every concern which operates atomic power plants has to hold back money for the renaturation of old atomic power plants. Other atomic power countries put this money in safe “layback-fonds”.

But in Germany this money stays in the concerns (!). This is a cheap financing source for the ongoing business. When a company goes on the rocks, the society pays for the radiative waste disposal.

The production price for atomic power electricity does not reflect the riscs and costs. Atomic power plants can’t amortise. And most atomic power plants in Germany can be described as written off. The high costs for the construction were subsidised - these subsidies were already taken in. So, old atomic power plants are indeed money printers.

More on that HERE



Read Full Post »


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 71 other followers