Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Atombomb’ Category

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

Dear readers, please share this. There is much need for it, since even anti atomic people don’t know this.

First of all I want to thank Mochizuki Cheshire Iori http://fukushima-diary.com/ and http://ex-skf.blogspot.com/ for their reports.

Up to 1,300,000,000 people have died because of the nuclear fission: http://exacteditions.theecologist.org/exact/browsePages.do?issue=5368&size=3&pageLabel=408

“This estimate does not include the dose from radioactive carbon (carbon 14) which, because of its 5730-year half-life, persists in the human food chain and has not yet taken its total human toll.” http://www.ratical.org/radiation/NRBE/NRBE12.html#Rfn35

“We are constantly being told about a ‘permissible amount of radiation.’ Who permitted it? Who has any right to permit it?” Albert Schweitzer

http://icanw.org/1957

“The most important consideration is the generally accepted value judgment that early embryonic losses are of little personal or social concern.” Dr R. Mole, 1979, a member of ICRP – The international committee which makes the dose limits WORLDWIDE ignores LIFE. http://bjr.birjournals.org/content/52/614/89

Dwight Eisenhower advised AEC (NRC): “Keep the Public confused about Fission and Fusion.” http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1755&dat=19790423&id=nXUjAAAAIBAJ&sjid=lmcEAAAAIBAJ&pg=6981,3863905

INDEPENDENT RADIATION MEASUREMENTS JAPAN Citizen’s Radioactivity Measuring Station http://en.crms-jpn.com/index.html adress: 〒960-8036 / Fukushima-shishinmachi 8-8 / Meiho Bill 3F MAIL: info@crms-jpn.com /

You all know the recent development:

Japanese officials deny radiation free life: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVuGwc9dlhQ Scandal Taints Japan Nuclear Sector http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904823804576499942442007306.html?mod=rss_asia_whats_news The Japanese Government wants the people to return to Fukushima! Like it happened in Chernobyl areas in Belarus: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/​2011/07/24/japan-goes-the-same​-way-as-belarus-dictatorship-a​-deep-insight/ Proof: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v​=8xL3MiDEtrA At Minute 11:21.

N.R.C. Study Downgrades Death Risks in Nuclear Meltdowns http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/30/science/earth/30radiation.html?_r=3 And this is N.R.C.’s other “business”: General license for use of DEPLETED URANIUM: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/part040/part040-0025.html

Japan Held Nuclear Data, Leaving Evacuees in Peril http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/09/world/asia/09japan.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all%3Fsrc%3Dtp Japan opens evacuating area: http://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20110809/t10014788651000.html The only help from Japanese government for radiation victims: Censorship http://japanfocus.org/-Makiko-Segawa/3516 This all happened also in Chernobyl affected Countries, mostly in Belarus. This is the 25 years outlook for Japan: http://www.strahlentelex.d​e/Yablokov%20Chernobyl%20b​ook.pdf

What’s behind all this? What is low radiation everyone hears about these days? It’s a long, but interesting read:

The international radiation protection bodies such as ICRP, UNSCEAR and BEIR base their findings on the somatic damage (cancer, leukemia risks) mainly on studies of the victims of the nuclear tests of Nagasaki and Hiroshima, wo still lived in 1950. That’s right, not 1945, 1950! This study is called “T65D.” It was begun in 1950. The five years before that has not been studied. It was observed since 1950. About 800,000 Japanese people harmed by radiation, and the analysation of their causes of death. http://www.rerf.or.jp/glos​sary_e/t65d.htm and:  http://www.rerf.or.jp/library/archives_e/lsstitle.html /  For validation of this study the US even did an atomic test in Nevada: http://www.sciencemag.org/​content/212/4497/900.extra​ct

More: “Since 1950, more than 90,000 of the survivors of the atomic bombings at Hiroshima and Nagasaki have been enrolled in a lifetime study of their health”: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/RIC/chp4F.html / Alteration of the study: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/RIC/chp5F.html

Quote “Radiation protection norms are a HOAX: “Since 1950, more than 90,000 of the survivors of the atomic bombings at Hiroshima and Nagasaki have been enrolled in a lifetime study of their health. The study, first conducted by the Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission (ABCC), was transferred in 1975 to control by the Radiation Effects Research Foundation (RERF), which has its headquarters at 5-2 Hijiyama Park, Minami-Ku, Hiroshima 732, Japan. and true magnitude of the radiation risk. RERF is equally funded by the government of Japan through its Ministry of Health and Welfare and by the government of the United States via the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) under contract with the Department of Energy (DOE)…”

Each person has been exposed to a certain dose of radiation that had to be estimated later (!) Because of the location of the bomb explosion at the moment (T65D study). It is at HIGH DOSE SHORT TERM (explosion). This is in contrast to chronic low-level radiation. ICRP, UNSCEAR and BEIR exclude results that you get from high doses to the low dose effects. THIS IS A CRIME and unscientific and unethic.

K.Z. Morgan, former ICRP chairman even admitted that there is NO safe level of radiation: http://books.google.de/books?id=aAoAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA30&lpg=PA30#v=onepage&q&f=false

So, why are there radiation limits? How can that be?

Since 1927, we know the dangers of radiation: 1927 Herman J Mueller discovered in 1927 (!) the following: ARTIFICIAL TRANSMUTATION OF THE GENE by radiation – he got the The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1946: http://www.esp.org/foundations/genetics/classical/holdings/m/hjm-1927a.pdf

So, why do ICRP, UNSCEAR, IAEA, all governments, health ministries, nuke plant operators and BEIR ignore this? There are many answers. And many many questions. All lead to one goal. More on that later. The first thing is, we have to think like the atomic industry. They want to protect their ideology of former US president Dwight Eisenhower’s “Atoms for Peace”. This was made public in 1953. But, that an atom can be peaceful is unobjective. A “peaceful” atomic program even increases the risk of proliferation: Those countries which have developed and built nuclear bombs in recent decades began with a civil nuclear program. However, these civil programs were often only a cover for their military interests and provided them with access to the technologies and know-how for the design of nuclear bombs. This fact shows that the export and further proliferation of nuclear technology significantly increases the risk of nuclear weapons proliferation. Iran: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/06/23/us-afghan-withdrawal-because-of-upcoming-nuclear-attack-on-iran/ Atomic energy is also often washed green, after reading this, it won’t work any longer: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/GreenDereg.html

ATOMIC HISTORY: http://independentwho.info/Documents/Rapport_France/Rapport_Bataille_179.pdf / french consumption: http://independentwho.info/Documents/Rapport_France/Rapport_Bataille_179.pdf

In 1953 President Dwight D. Eisenhower declared war upon every citizen and living being with “The Peaceful Atom”: http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/dwightdeisenhoweratomsforpeace.html  the agenda was then further developed in 1954 with the first hydrogen bomb testing: http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/march/1/newsid_2781000/2781419.stm which changed the most important international program for radiation protection and compensation: THE ALARA PRINCIPLE:
http://hps.ne.uiuc.edu/nat​cisoe/2011%20EPRI%20ISOE%2​0Conference%20Brochure.pdf​.pdf page 5 “Plenary Session: Nuclear Power’s Mandate for Safe, Efficient and ALARA Operating Philosophy. http://hps.ne.uiuc.edu/nat​cisoe/symposiumpapers/2003​/2003SymposiumAgenda.pdf It’s magic, it’s “ICRP proven”.

As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) was replaced by: As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP): To satisfy the ALARP principle, measures necessary to reduce risk must be taken until or unless the cost of those measures, whether money, time or trouble is disproportionate to the reduction in risk.” PAGE 170 – by UK Departement of Energy & Climatechange – QUOTE:

An example: quote “as far as is practically achievable”: http://enformable.com/2011/09/scottish-nuclear-leak-will-never-be-completely-cleaned-up/

http://www.decc.gov.uk/assets/decc/11/meeting-energy-demand/consents-planning/nps2011/1925-appl-of-sust-of-revised-draft-en6.pdf
basically: Money over Health – a licence to kill. In the beginning (before the h bomb test) the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle was turned against the atomic industry. It said, that radiation exposure has to be held as low as possible, that means as low as rasonably achievable. But hydrogen bombs cause much radiation.The ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection) turned around this principle (after the first hydrogen bomb explosion in 1954): http://books.google.de/books?id=MHWEk6wZc10C&pg=RA1-PA139&dq=ICRP+ALARA+1973&hl=de&ei=yopBTvnUFNGdOpvpuagJ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CD4Q6AEwAw#v=onepage&q&f=false  quote “…economic and social…” ETHIC is missing! – so that the ALARA principle is now working FOR the atomic industry, even if a reactor crashes next to you. ICRP said, that ALARA does not refer to accidents.The ICRP also says the set of radiation levels for anticipated activities should be determined by cost-benefit analysis. Your health is a cost-benefit issue during a atomic catastrophe. Basically this means: When an accident happens (an atomic reactor crash, for example) the whole point of Status Quo is that the people are contaminated with radiation.

More of this insanity (Stanford): http://slac.stanford.edu/pubs/slacpubs/13750/slac-pub-13800.pdf – quote “On the basis of the resulting model, known as the LNT (Linear-No Threshold) model, collective dose equivalent is a good measure…” Why is this a good measure? Sternglass showed that there are 4 dose-response curves: http://books.google.de/books?id=XAcAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA29&lpg=PA29#v=onepage&q&f=false

“Presently the international organizations (WHO, IAEA) recognize as the main cause of increase of thyroid cancer in liquidators and children population after the accident their irradiation with radioactive iodine, I-131. The rest of diseases, they suppose, are provoked by psycho-emotional reactions. ” http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Burlakova.pdf The bimodal dependence of effects on dose was
revealed for all studied parameters. Namely, effects increased at low doses, reached maximum (for low doses), then decreased (in some cases the effect sign reversed) and thereafter increased with the increase of
dosage.

Why NUCLEAR reactors cause FOREST decline: “The plant must take in MUCH more air than animals to get enough carbon. Carbon 14 is produced by cosmic rays, bomb tests and nuclear power plants. By 1963, Carbon 14 in the Northern Hemisphere had increased by 100 percent, and by 1984, about one decade later, it had increased another 25 percent. An increase in radioactivity of only one percent eventually translates into a decline in tree growth of about 18 percent. It is interesting to note that a global increase of Carbon 14 – one such as has never before been seen – parallels the slowing growth and the endemic death of trees from Lebanon to the Himalayas. The decline of the forests has grown from a disturbing trend to a catastrophe of dramatic proportions. Hardly has one study on the subject been finished than it is surpassed by another bearing worse tidings. Not so long ago, the march of death was confined to certain species in certain locations – to day it is a virtually global epidemic. Fruit trees are showing the same symptoms as those of the forest. 30 percent of the fruit trees in the Canton of Thurgovi in Switzerland are destroyed. Now they fear the vineyards will follow.”

“We now have proof of the risk of interrupting the very basis of the life cycle of plants, animals and man – in brief, photosynthesis on Earth is endangered!”
“There is a fundamental difference between plants and animals, and this determines why plants are so much more sensitive to air pollution. We animals need air for its oxygen, to burn our food so as to obtain energy. The plant, however, gets almost all of its nutrition in the form of carbon, which is contained in the air in the form of carbonic acid (C02) and is made available to the plant through the process of photosynthesis.”
“The prodigious aeration of the plants explains their tremendous sensitivity to air pollution. The toxic effects of airborn pollutants show up earlier in plants than in the human.” http://www.nuclearreader.info/chapter3.html

Page 2: “Table 1 Incidence of 12 classes of disease among liquidators per 100 thousand people” – shows massive increase of diseases. Page 6 “relation between effects at low-intensive dosage and dose rate” and Page 11 “the PRESENCE of linear or linear-quadratic dependency IS NOT obligatory for the cases of diseases and deaths from malignant neoplasm at low doses”: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Burlakova.pdf

FATAL ERRORS in the ICRP model: http://www.cerrie.org/workshop/Talk_02.pdf

For if it is scandalous to die, it is even more scandalous when the traces of the dead degenerate into the death of all traces.” Atomic Industry = Invisible War: http://www.lit.kobe-u.ac.jp/philosophy/images/pdf/Paul_JOBIN/ThebaudMony-PrefaceEnglishEd.pdf

Quote: “The victims of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and patients treated with X-rays because of such dubious indications as thymus hyperplasia demonstrate the exceptionally high sensitivity of children. However, the important discovery of Stewart and coworkers in 1958 , an enhancement of childhood leukaemia following diagnostic X-ray pictures during pregnancy, listed as historic milestone by Mossman also, has provoked a deep controversy. Their findings were an impressive support of the postulated linear non-threshold relationship for leukaemia” SOURCE Page 2: http://www.staff.uni-marburg.de/~kunih/all-doc/doserele.pdf

After an atomic war, the US government suggests 10 Gray (!!!) as an acceptable dose in one year for us: QUOTE “…Almost as soon as we had begun our work, a disturbing fact emerged. All the calculations made by government agencies as to the radiation protection necessary after a full-scale nuclear war were based on the assumption that the adult could tolerate the enormous dose of 200 rads spread over a few days and as much as 1000 rads over a year. Apparently it had been decided by the government’s scientific advisory groups that it was not necessary to take into account the long-range after-effects of radiation, either on the survivors themselves or on their offspring…” by Ernest Sternglass: http://www.nucleardemolition.com/SF.pdf, PAGE 22

This was also made public in the 1963 issue of the SCIENCE magazine: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/140/3571/1102.abstract Cancer: Relation of Prenatal Radiation to Development of the Disease in Childhood.

STRONTIUM-90 IN BABY TEETH AS A FACTOR IN EARLY CHILDHOOD CANCER: http://www.radiation.org/reading/ijhs/ijhs_methods.html and: An unexpected rise in strontium-90 in US deciduous teeth in the
1990s: http://stopfplnow.org/literature/Mangano_2003_Trends_Microbiol.pdf

Sternglass is an emeritus professor at the University of Pittsburgh and Director of the Radiation and Public Health Project. He is an American physicist and author, best known for his controversial research on the health risks of low-level radiation from atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons and from nuclear power plants. This is  his study “Infant Mortality Changes Following the Three Mile Island Accident,” from 1980: http://atomichistory.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/sternglass_infantmortalitytmi.pdf quote “The discrepancy in infant deaths between the two sources for the period of April 1 through June 30, 1979, had been two; from October 1 through December 31 it had also been two. For eighty-eight to surface between July 1 and September 30, precisely in the controversial summer months after the TMI accident, seemed unlikely.”

Risk assessments of small radiation doses differ by two orders of magnitude, depending on whose theory they are applied to or which observed data is used. Unfortunately, this is not just an academic interest. The choice of a model for risk calculation can cause enormous Costs. Powerful outside interests are coming into play. The best illustration of this is the story of the BEIR III report: http://books.google.de/books?id=VAoAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA3&lpg=PA3#v=onepage&q&f=false by Joseph Rotblat

They can irradiate you and do not compensate you – and if they do, they do it with your money. No reactor is assured, mind you. Used in Belarus (Most Chernobyl affected country in the world):and now in Japan (Fukushima):

EXELON nuclear (US company) talking about ALARAhttp://www.decc.gov.uk/ass ​ets/decc/11/meeting-energy​-demand/consents-planning/​ nps2011/1925-appl-of-sust-​of-revised-draft-en6.pdf Remember: This is the only VALID and OFFICIAL angenda for compensation during an atomic accident!

The h bomb testing is the successor to the Hiroshima / Nagasaki testing (!).

But how does low radiation work? Answer: PETKAU EFFECT: http://www.esp.org/foundations/genetics/classical/holdings/m/hjm-1927a.pdf

Discovered by Abraham Petkau, 1972. He discovered: that 26 RAD per Minute (fast radiation rate) need a total dose of 3500 RAD to harm a cell membrane. With 0,001 RAD per Minute (slow dose) only 0,7 RAD are needed to harm a cell membrane. The Mechanism behind it: The production of free radicals of Oxygen (O² with a negative electric charge) caused by ionising effect of the radiation. The free radicals caused by the slow dose (0,001) are sparsely distributed radicals do have a higher chance to reach the cell membranes. Why: The free radicals of the fast radiation rate (26) are tight together and so they react faster with each other. The low electric charge of the cell membranes attract the free radicals in the early state of the reaction (minor total dose).

The indirect chemical damage to cell membranes in the low dose range is much more important than the direct effect of radiation on the nucleus with its genetic material. In the nucleus there appears to be much stronger repair mechanisms than in the cell membranes. This is consistent with the purposes of evolution: Increasingly higher development of life. First and foremost, namely the genes in the nucleus had greatly developed by repair mechanisms to be protected. Only then could the nature of the gene pool protect itself against the highly damaging properties of natural radiation, and thus maintain the relative stability of species over millions of years.

If the harmed cells are monocytes this will cause: Anemia, because the monocytes recycle 37 – 40 % of the iron of dying red blood cells. Weakened immune system in the cells, because the monocytes generate the substance which activates the immune system of the lymphocytes. This is the so called “Bura Bura” – of Hiroshima and Nagasaki survivors.  Routine radioactive emissions are dangerous because they are the main source of low-level radiation. Strong radiation comes from large accidents. Petkau discovered that the response is logarithmic to radiation, that means, concave downward. So the risk is higher at low doses of radiation than larger ones. The damage to the immune system due to low-level radiation can be controlled to some extent by measures that strengthen the immune system: antioxidant, vitamin C, vitamin E. The biochemical mechanisms by which the immune system is damaged, are different from the damage to the DNA caused by high radiation doses. If you have low-level radiation in addition to other mechanisms, the formation of free radicals by antioxidants such as vitamin C or E can be lifted. The only way to really deal with the problem of low-level radiation, is, as soon as possible to switch off any atomic reactor .

Sources:

> Petkau A. Effects of 22 Na + on phospholipid membrane injury to irradiated erythrocytes. Radiation Research 1968, 34:335-346.
>Sternglass EJ. Implication of dose-rate dependent cell-membrane damage for the biological effets of medical and environmental radiation. Proceedings of the symposium on population exposures, Knoxville TN, October 21-23, 1974. (CONF-741 018)

Radiation particles, directly hit the protoplasm and not the nucleus. they leave behind damage, which is only noticeable when these cells divide again. So instabilities occur in the chromosomes, the genes and genetic information. Instabilities that are not visible in the first, but especially in the second and third generation increase disease susceptibility: http://www.independentwho.info/Presse_ecrite/09_05_27_Salzburger_DE.pdf

But in contrast to the gene pool, individual members of populations (plants, animals, people) for the evolution are not so important to the contrary, her constant death and her replacement by reproduction is an important evolutionary process. The repair mechanisms in the cell membranes were needed, but weren’t  so important, because you only caused diseases, but no genetic defects. And if one member of a population has fulfilled its evolutionary role of reproduction, sit is no longer needed, so a life extension beyond the reproductive age is also not absolutely necessary. This is for the survival of animals and plant species are not necessarily problematic, however, for human society. Each individual hopes to a long and healthy life, far beyond reproduction age. In addition, an adaptation to environmental toxic substances in humans is not possbile, because of the generational change phaes which are very long. But we add more radiation by atomic energy with it’s low radiation emission, accidents, catastrophes – which are peeks.

Internal irradiation happens when radioactive material is ingested into the body(…) Inhaling even the tiniest particle, that’s the danger. making comparisons with X-rays and CT scans has no meaning. Because you can breathe in radioactive material… quote: http://www.independentwho.info/Presse_ecrite/11_03_28_TakashiHirose_EN.pdf

For years, scientists have established a causal relationship between radiation exposure and hypothyroidism. In particular, radioactive iodine (which seeks out the thyroid gland, and destroys cells) is linked with the disease. Here it is: “GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION IN U.S. THYROID CANCER INCIDENCE, AND A CLUSTER NEAR NUCLEAR REACTORS IN NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK, AND PENNSYLVANIA” http://www.radiation.org/reading/pubs/091116Thyroidcancer.pdf During pregnancy, thyroid gland controls Brain Growth of Fetus

Carbon 14 is a natural emitter. But the man made C14 id added by atomic bomb tests. C14 was “forgotten” to measure untill 1973. It’s halflife: 5730 years. It causes cancer and in the long term genetic damage. Source: http://www.springerlink.com/content/j354787301473​21q/ by Robert Pohl. It was increased in the nothern troposphere by 100% by the bomb tests. 1984 by 25%: http://www.osti.gov/energy​citations/product.biblio.j​sp?osti_id=5299106

Let’s continue with our story. Now, the post h-bomb era: In 1959 the WHO was gagged by the WHA 12-40 contract with the IAEA: http://www.independentwho.info/Documents/M_Fernex/ChernobylCatastrophe_Fernex_EN.pdf Doctors of the UN are not allowed to accept or release studies about radiation health issues without the validation of the atomic industryhttp://mondediplo.com/2008/04/14who and: http://www.independentwho.info/WHA_12_40_EN.php?sous_menu=onu and: http://www.independentwho.info/presse_EN.php

The statutes of the IAEA: http://www.independentwho.info/Documents/ONU/statut_AIEA_EN.pdf / http://www.independentwho.info/documentation_EN.php

MORE:

http://www.independentwho.info/Presse_ecrite/11_05_06_DW-World_EN.pdf

http://www.independentwho.info/Presse_ecrite/09_05_29_Guardian_EN.pdf

http://www.independentwho.info/Presse_ecrite/11_04_27_IPS_EN.pdf

http://www.independentwho.info/Presse_ecrite/11_05_05_IPS_EN.pdf

Then, Chernobyl and Fukushima were used to increase background radiation – in order to accelerate and alter evolution. Please keep in mind, that it was natural radiation (not man made) that caused EVOLUTION, but also mutation, diabilities and cancer. Quote “When I looked back to see what was said to be the radiation level–just in North America–it used to be that we got sixty millirem a year background radiation–that was the measurement. Then it went up to about a hundred. And then I heard a hundred and twenty and they’re now saying two hundred.  Now there are some reasons for it. That first number, sixty, didn’t have radon gas in it. Radon gas is generally released by uranium mining and it now bathes all of North America and it’s pocketed more in some places than others. Also our construction has dug into ore beds and we’ve released a lot of radiation. “ – source: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/inetSeries/RB89.html

“People who live along a transportation route are assumed automatically by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission to get the equivalent of two or three chest X-rays a year–just if you live along the transportation route. That means no accident, no stopping, no nothing.” quote from: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/inetSeries/RB89.html

We now are in the progress of a new evolution – it’s called ATOMIC DARWINISM: http://tekknorg.wordpress.​com/2011/07/15/less-girls-​are-born-because-of-nuclea​r-power-global-population-​growth-control/ Examples: The ICRP refers to any unusual bleeding disorders found in Hiroshima and Nagasaki just as misdiagnosis: http://books.google.de/boo ​ks?id=lgYAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA26​&lpg=PA26&dq=radiation+sta​ ndards+robert+alvarez&sour​ce=bl&ots=Tmi95_Q6DT&sig=L​ Q7coEWdFM6NMtzrfjw60nJEoWQ​&hl=de&ei=o-o2TqOkCoPMswaI​ r4m6Ag&sa=X&oi=book_result​ &ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0C​CQQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=radi​ ation%20standards%20robert​%20alvarez&f=false . and: http://www.helmholtz-muenchen.de/ibb/homepage/hagen.scherb/KusmierzVoigtScherb2010BonnProceedings%20short.pdf

The Codex Alimentarius Commission http://www.codexalimentarius.net/web/index_en.jsp at its 18th Session (Geneva 1989) adopted Guideline Levels for Radionuclides in Foods Following Accidental Nuclear Contamination. The Guideline Levels which are in this publication remain applicable for one year following a nuclear accident: http://www.criirad.org/actuali​tes/dossiers2005/menacesradioa​ctivesaliments/codexanglais198​9.pdf

ALERT: Fish near Fukushima at 4000% above Codex Alimentarius limit for radioactive I-131 – Oct 2011

Prof. Jacobi – Director of the Institute for Radiation Protection of the Society for Radiation and Environmental Research Ltd. Munich (http://www.iaea.org/inis/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/04/091/4091257.pdf) – Neaherbergm, said in  his speech from March 3rd 1973, that he is representing a maximum acceptable radiation risk of the population (without asking them!) and assumed that a civilizational radiation risk exists only when it is visible. The risk would be only low (and therefore should be acceptable and useful), that in the existing natural (spontaneous) frequency of cancer of the total population it would be not detected! For Germany, it seemed (in 2350 spontaneous cancer deaths per million inhabitants), a maximum of ten deaths per year and per million inhabitants is ACCEPTABLE! That makes (80 million people in Germany) 800 cancer deaths by nuclear power stations per year, ACCEPTABLE! Is this still a democracy? Such a drug might would have never get the permission to come on the market! But it is nuclear energy, which is allowed! Thus ANY MURDER WOULD BE ACCEPTABLE, because people die anyway!

Quote: “One also needs to recognise that practically all protection measures undertaken in the USSR after the accident at the Chernobyl NPP have failed, such as iodine prophylactics, ban on consumption of contaminated foodstuffs, decontamination of affected settlements, attempts to improve the life standards in the affected areas, etc. The same happened to the state financial support of the people from the affected territories because the inevitably arbitrary allocations have produced an opposite effect, i.e. feeling of inequality and jealousy.” – PAGE 4, left bottom: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Malko3.pdf ALSO on PAGE 4: right, top: The “350 mSv Concept” – which is an equivalent of 500 mammograms per year! For Children!

Remember: Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology says 3.8 microsieverts per hour o.k., that’s more than 33 millisieverts (mSv) per year. For children, kindergartens, nursery, primary and junior high schools. That’s an equivalent of 50 mammograms. And now add the irradiated food, the irradiatesd water… add the altered genes, mixed up now and in future generations. Human Fetus radiation tolerance: ZERO. Source: http://peaceandhealthblog.com/2011/04/26/children-of-fukushima/ and: http://www.ippnw.de/commonFiles/pdfs/Atomenergie/Reference_Embryo.pdf

In contrast: “…To provide an adequate safety standard the dose limit of 1 mSv/y have to be reduced to 0.02 mSv/y or 20 µSv/y.”Page 9:  http://www.staff.uni-marburg.de/~kunih/all-doc/stoakuni.pdf by Dr. Horst Kuni, Nuclear Medicine, University Professor.

MODIFICATIONS IN CARDIAC-VASCULAR SYSTEM OF
CHILDREN, LIVING IN CONTAMINATED WITH RADIOISOTOPES
TERRITORY: http://chernobyl-today.org/images/stories/Bandajevski_2001_Radiocaesium_and_heart.pdf
Clinical investigations included the following groups:
1. Children aged between 3 – 7 years (227 individuals),
living in Gomel (soil contamination with 137Cs was 1-5
Ci/km2);
2. Children aged between 6 – 8 years (76 individuals), living
in Vetka (soil contamination with 137Cs was 15 – 40
Ci/km2);
3. Children aged between 7 – 16years (55 individuals), living
in Svetilovichi (soil contamination with 137Cs was 15 – 40
Ci/km2);
4. Children aged between 3 – 7 years (104 individuals),
living in Grodno (soil contamination with 137Cs was less
than 1 Ci/km2) – the first control group;
5. Children aged between 10 – 15 years (50 individuals),
living in Minsk (soil contamination with 137Cs was less
than 1 Ci/km2) – the second control group;
6. Children aged between 3 – 7 years (118 individuals),
living in Zhlobin (soil contamination with 137Cs was less
than 1 Ci/km2);
7. Children aged between 14 days and 14 months (155
individuals) and their mothers, constantly living in Gomel
and in Gomel localities and having hospital treatment in
Gomel Children’s District Clinical Hospital;
8. Children aged between 8 – 15 years (211 individuals)
with chronic pathology of gastro-intestinal tract, constantly
living on the territory with the level of soil contamination
with 137Cs from 1 to 15 Ci/km2 and having hospital
treatment in Gomel Children’s District Clinical Hospital;
9. Students of Gomel Medical Institute aged between 18 –
20 years (197 individuals).

http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Lazjuk.pdf Genetic Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident for Belarus Republic – Register exists since 1982 – although the IAEA denies this!

We are even aging faster because of low radiation: The complex mechanisms of premature senescence http://www.ratical.com/radiation/Chernobyl/Fig01.html

The invention of trivialization of nuclear accidents, made in Germany, 1975: Quote P.17 “The next logical step is to embed residual risks in a spectrum of natural risks such as earthquakes, lightning, and the like…”: http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Admin/PUB/Documents/RR-76-001.p
Wolf Härtele, 1976, in JAPAN, he is a Swabian pastor’s (!) son, Physicist, advocate of fast breeder technology and preferred disciple of Carl Friedrich von Weizsacker My Source: Book: The Atomic State – by Robert Jungk.  Häfele impressed with this risk philosohpy also the Church and Society of the World Council of Churches, which took his arguments for the debate book “Facing Up to Nuclear Power”:
http://www.amazon.de/Facing-Nuclear-Power-Contribution-Potentialities/dp/0715203401 And this was the end of the fast breeder program: http://www.chernobylcongress.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/Baverstock_How_the_UN_works.pdf quote: “In about 1980 Gian-Carlo Pinchera, an Italian nuclear physicist, showed that fast reactors were inherently unsafe. That single conference paper led to the almost total abandonment of the fast breeder programme. (…) he warned “beware the dying kick of the nuclear advocates.” This is what we see today but maybe they are not dying!”  quote by Keith Baverstock.

On May 4th 2011, Secretary General Margaret Chan of the W.H.O. said: “There is no safe low levels of radiation, ” more: https://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/05/12/w-h-o-secretary-general-chan-admits-for-the-first-time-in-52-years-radiation-is-always-dangerous/

CHILDREN:

Nobel peace laureate Linus Pauling proved, that by fallout of the atomic and h bomb tests of 1958 15.000 children with severe hereditary error came to the world in one year. 38,000 children were born dead. 90,000 were murdered inside of the mother.  http://books.google.de/books?id=2QduA19d_X8C&pg=PA1310&dq=Linus+Pauling:+Biomolecular+sciences+90,000&hl=de&ei=tXlGTuMWg8PxA4rQscoG&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CDEQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false In 1963 the radioactivity in milk was so high, the public got alarmed. But the USAEC denied everything. Former President Kennedy held his speech and demanded the bomb test stop. Ironically, the health authorities were particularly zealous advocates of nuclear bombs Supporters. CARBON 14 is a real danger. It natural and man made.

On April 25th 1953 the US tested an atomic bomb in Nevada: http://www.nytimes.com/2003/04/18/nyregion/book-examines-nevada-test-that-left-fallout-in-troy-ny.html Fallout and strong rain went down on New York, parts of Vermont and Masachusetts. Half a million people were affected. 270,000 micro curie were measured in the City “Troy”. The NRC standard is 100 micro curie. But the USAEC didn’t make epidemiological study. Chance missed, Nuclear 1, Humanity ZERO. 1962; Ralph E. Lapp, “Nevada Test Fallout and Radioiodine in Milk,”: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/137/3532/756.abstract

Child mortality from pneumonia and influenza was increased between 1950 and 1965 (http://www.independentwho.info/histoire_EN.php) by the atomic and h bomb fallout. Low radiation (Petkau Effect) damaged the immune system. So, children were killed by influenza and pneumonia: 400,000 dead children. After the atomic bomb test stop from 1963, the curve went down. See the US Vital Staistics: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/vsus.htm The bomb tests killed 2 – 3,000,000 children! Less rain ment less children mortality. Compare New Mexico. http://books.google.de/books?id=wAcAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA41#v=onepage&q&f=false

Childhood Cancer in the Vicinity of German Nuclear Power Plants http://ippnw.org/pdf/mgs/6-1-korblein.pdf and: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2007/12/17/german-kikk-study-higher-cancer-risc-next-to-atomic-power-plants-unofficial-belarussian-children-cancer-data/

This is proven also by the Bob Hopkins study from 1973. The Department of Public Health proved with the study of Kurihara “cancer mortality for selected sites in 24 countries japan society” from nov 1972 Tohoku /Japan, that there was an 600 % increase in children mortality of japanese chidren age 5 till 9 years, after the Hrioshima and Nagasaki atomic test.

No dictator has ever had so much power! To kill future generations!

Intelligence and Brain Damage in Children Acutely Irradiated in Utero As a Result of the Chernobyl Accident – Department of Neurology, Institute for Clinical Radiology, Research Centre for Radiation Medicine of Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, WHO Collaborative Centre: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr79/kr79pdf/Nyagu.pdf

You think you know all? Think again: In 1984 the bulletin of american scientist gave out a Tritium Warning: http://books.google.de/books?id=3gUAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA56&lpg=PA56#v=onepage&q&f=false

Important for Japan: POLIKARPOV, G. G. 1966. RADIOECOLOGY of AQUATIC organisms. English transl. edited by V. Schultz and A. Please look at the pages: 281 (PDF page) or respectively on “printed” 292 document page for a table of doses of ionizing radiation for marine and freshwater organisms: http://www.osti.gov/bridge/purl.cover.jsp?purl=/5557734-tlwxvK/

Low Radiation and AQUA Life: in this context: ZINC 65 detected in oysters, 300 (!) miles downstream from HANFORD USA, in Willapa bay PAGE 20 right: http://books.google.de/books?id=5gUAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA20&dq=hanford+worker+zinc+65+was+detected&hl=de&ei=97E5Tt6xMsiv8gOkqLTjCA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CC4Q6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=hanford%20worker%20zinc%2065%20was%20detected&f=false

Mice developed a new type of cancer, AFTER 25 GENERATIONS (quote: “unusual cancer after 25 generations” at http://books.google.de/books?id=3gUAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA56&lpg=PA56#v=onepage&q=mewissen%20fo-cuses%20on%2025&f=false)! And 10 Generations – By Tritium / H³! Source: http://www.nirs.org/radiation/tritium/abstr10.pdf and http://www.nirs.org/radiation/tritium/abstr14.pdf Tritium is released from every nuclear power plant in the world. During the revision of a reactor up to 5 million Becquerel per liter of air! https://tekknorg.wordpress​.com/2011/07/18/reactors-e​mitting-tritium-during-nor​mal-mode-children-cancer/ Tritium is a radioactive gas, highly toxic if inhaled. It falls to earth with precipitation in the form of tritiated water. The tritium atoms can replace hydrogen atoms (about half the atoms of the human body are composed of hydrogen) and in the form of tritiated water, the isotope of hydrogen can enter the food chain and set in the body, leading to damage and mutations in DNA. Nuclear facilities emit considerable amounts of tritium which makes the water radioactive. By cooling towers and other ways. This is the reason for rising children cancer rates near nuclear reactors:http://www.fraw.org.uk/mei/archive/magnox_a1_28.pdf

Mice are mammals, show mutation earlier than we – who are alos mammals.

Teratological effects and mutations through radiation – ignored by IAEA, OECD, ICRP, UNSCEAR, SCIENCE – proven by Étienne Wolff in the 1930ies: http://books.google.com/books/about/Th%C3%A8ses_pr%C3%A9sent%C3%A9es_%C3%A0_la_Facult%C3%A9_des.html?id=MQvwcQAACAAJ and: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,862623,00.html and: http://www.ijdb.ehu.es/web/paper.php?doi=041944cg&a=f

Insects and their fast mutagenic “reaction” on low radiation are some kind of early warning system for us humans: Irradiated Insects in Japan: http://www.freeml.com/bl/8694840/25149/ normal insects soon only in the laboratory: http://www.wissenskunst.ch/en/tschernobyl.htm Great book about mutagentic impact on insects worldwide: http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/3908247314/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=thtefi-21&linkCode=as2&camp=1634&creative=6738&creativeASIN=3908247314 Reduced abundance of insects and spiders linked to radiation at Chernobyl: http://cricket.biol.sc.edu/chernobyl/papers/moller-mousseau-biol-letters-09.pdf please have a look at this beautiful book – in english: http://radionucleide.free.fr/Stresseurs/fulltext_punaise.pdf and in german: http://www.sensigns.ch/db/daten/dokumente/Heteroptera_Deutsch.pdf

Because reactors depend on heavy water as a moderator, they release larger amounts of tritium to the environment than light water reactors (…) Tritium is a carcinogen, mutagen, teratogen and developmental toxin. It becomes incorporated into DNA and disrupts the genetic code of men’s and women’s reproductive cells: http://www.iicph.org/files/IICPH-Final-Statement-re-Darlington-NNPP-May-17-2011.pdf – current Guideline and Drinking Water Quality Standard for tritium is 7,000 Bq/L, which is based on the permissible ICRP dose limit of 1 mSv/year (lowered to 0.1 mSv in water). This “standard” corresponds to a risk of 350 excess fatal cancers per million people from just one year’s consumption of drinking water, not a lifetime (70 years) 300 million people living in the US: 105,000 DEATHS PER YEAR x 30 years = 3,150,000 murdered people by the peaceful atom! Multiplied x global = weapons of mass destruction

“But tritium can be deadly (…) However tritium behaves chemically and biochemically like ordinary hydrogen. When ingested, it can incorporate itself into all forms of body cells, including those of the reproductive system…” Source: http://ratical.org/radiation/KillingOurOwn/KOO10.html

Even the NRC (While external exposure to tritium is not a major concern, tritium incorporated into the genetic material of organisms is of concern because of its ability to produce chromosome breaks and mutations, quote source: http://www.osti.gov/bridge/servlets/purl/5529013-BMHYUp/5529013.pdf) and IAEA (Source: Tritium in Some Typical Ecosystems, 1981 technical meeting http://www.iaea.org/inis/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/14/773/14773665.pdf) admitted, that Tritium is a problem, by the (then) year 2000.

A few months after Three Mile Island a study was made public – which showed a 2,5 times increase in children leukemia: http://books.google.de/boo ​ks?id=Clrz_0sJZrQC&pg=PA29​6&lpg=PA296&dq=joseph+lyon​ +new+england+journal+of+me​dicine&source=bl&ots=BddTd​ pYt7g&sig=GsBQGEGS8u2KHHQQ​SL7_CsBe6DM&hl=de&ei=Cu02T​ uCUGYXxsgaXuaC5Ag&sa=X&oi=​book_result&ct=result&resn​ um=5&ved=0CEgQ6AEwBA#v=one​page&q=joseph%20lyon%20new​ %20england%20journal%20of%​20medicine&f=false But the US health office under Dr. Arnold Müller ignored this. The predecessor of Müller was Prof. Leod: http://atomichistory.wordp​ress.com/2009/09/13/dr-gor​don-macleod-on-tmi/ He agreed to the study of Josep Lyon and was FIRED.

Atomic Industry knows no freedom of speech, underimes law and democracy: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/07/24/japan-goes-the-same-way-as-belarus-dictatorship-a-deep-insight/ and: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/07/12/france-atomic-industry-knows-no-freedom-of-speech-the-epr-junk-reactor/

Japan officials are going to call radiation measurements illegal and that they are disturbing the industry. Health plays no role. They are adapting the IAEA ideology of Radiophobia: The fear of radiation is worse than the radiation. And the declining birth rates among belarusians under the age of 30 – declared by the IAEA with “Radiophobia”: http://www.iaea.org/inis/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/28/073/28073803.pdf – quote “2. PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACTS OF NUCLEAR ACCIDENTS : Soon after the discovery of ionizing radiation, it was realized that radiation could harmfully affect skin tissues, body organs and the human body as a whole beside the genetic effects. Lately after the drop of the first atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki and also after Three-Miles-Island and Chernobyl accidents anew phenomenon described as RADIOPHOBIA have become apparent and widely spread..” PAGE 338. More on Chernobyl: http://www.euradcom.org/publications/chernobylebook.pdf Civil Society with it’s Fukushima NGOs will become a threat to the poitical level and hunted down like in Belarus. Costs make pressure. Pressure destroys the democracy. No country in the world can pay for an atomic accident. Not a single reactor is assured, it’s simpy too expensive. Japanese government wants to reduce evacuation zone: http://mdn.mainichi.jp/mdnnews/national/archive/news/2011/07/15/20110715p2g00m0dm012000c.html 1996 said the belarusian president Lukashenko during a meeting of the IAEA: “We encourage people to come back. We will open the shops again and enable the people to return to their evacuated towns and villages.” National statements were made by the President of Belarus, Mr. A. Lukashenko: http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Magazines/Bulletin/Bull383/box1.html and:  http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/1996/inf510.shtml

This is an example from Japan: http://fukushima-diary.com/2011/08/column-what-is-the-purpose-of-people-to-call-us-paranoid/

Japan could use the The daiyo kangoku justice system (http://www.amnesty.org/en/region/japan/report-2011) against whistleblowers and civil society. And Saiban-in (Lay Judge) System http://www.amnestyusa.org/research/reports/annual-report-japan-2011?page=2

The Chernobyl aid-program in Belarus was stopped in 1994 / 95: PAGE 62 of this presentation : http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/NesterenkoChernobyl-Belarus.pdf and a new “pro nuclear” program replaced it, with help of the atomic industry: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/03/18/core-a-chernobyl-aid-program-that-kills/

And we, the “other” people are also radiation victims, we know nothing about the global radiation: There are 60 certified radionuclide stations fully equipped with high precision detectors that are set up around the world to monitor airborne radioactivity on a daily basis with unprecedented accuracy. Their objective : Find low quantities of radioactive particles that could reveal a possible nuclear test in violation of the Comprehensive nuclear test ban treaty (TICEN): http://petitions.criirad.org/?For-a-total-transparency-on-the

Krypton 85 is emitted from nuclear power plants and bruises the skin on more than 2 millimeters, which could be the cause for skin cancer. W.L. Boeck – President of the krypton 85 Working Group of the IAEA said in 1976 that the electrical conductivity of the air over oceans could be increased by 43 %. Result would be more lightning and unexpected weather phenomena: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/193/4249/195.extract

It also seems that low radiation kills us, by weakening of our immune system, thus we become more vulnerable to simple diseases. For example, accumulation of allergies.. large parts of the population can be so in 10 years or more, simply shut down: http://books.google.de/books?id=gjIzAAAAMAAJ – it’s some kind of genetic clean out.

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/grndwtr-contam-tritium.html – quote: “Tritium is a mildly radioactive type of hydrogen that occurs both naturally and during the operation of nuclear power plants.” PAGE 1

in contrast:

http://www.fraw.org.uk/mei/archive/magnox_a1_28.pdf – and:

http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/documents/WS1_thiel_Increased_Leukaemia_childhood_engl.pdf – quote: “The low-level radiation -and not “coincidence”- remains the only plausible explanation of the increased cancer rates.” PAGE 5

By low-level radiation from accidents and tritium emissions from cooling towers less girls are born:

http://www.tschernobylkongress.de/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/ScherbVoigt_fehlbildungen_fehlende_geburten.pdf – quote: “The gender gap in 1987 – 2007 (Chernobyl gender gap) corresponds to approximately 440 000 theoretical missing female births when only the female sex was affected. If also male births were affected at a ratio of male: female = 3:10, is the gender gap by about 790 000 (180 000 +610 000) male + female births” PAGE 32

More about Birth Sex Odds and Sex Odds Ratios around atomic industry: http://www.helmholtz-muenchen.de/ibb/homepage/hagen.scherb/proceedings.html

Increased sex ratio in Bavaria (Germany):
after Chernobyl and in the vicinity of Nuclear Power Plants -
epidemiological findings: http://www.tschernobylkongress.de/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/Koerblein_sexratio.pdf

What meaning might lie behind it? Fewer women means fewer people. Nuclear power is probably an instrument to curb population growth.

Tests with dogs in 1977 have proven, that small doses cause leukemia: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.go​v/pmc/articles/PMC2032130/ BEIR / ICRP talk this down and ignore it!

More about latency and leukemia: “Once the latency period has passed, a certain type of cancer will continue to appear year after year in a group of humans subjected years before to known ionizing radiation. Acute leukemias due to irradiation continue to appear in apparently undiminished numbers, consistently even 20 years after the Hiroshima-Nagasaki bombing. One form of leukemia, so-called chronic myelogenous leukemia, seems to appear among the exposed population steadily over a period of about 10 years and then to appear less frequently.” SOURCE: http://ratical.org/radiati​on/CNR/PP/chp3.html Table of Contents: http://ratical.org/radiati​on/CNR/PP/index.html#TOC

ONE radiograph during pregnancy: 20 % increase for cancer probability before the child is 10 years old. Two radiographs during pregnancy: 28 %. Three: 70 %. FOUR:…. 100 PERCENT. There is NO SAFE LEVEL OF RADIATION EXPOSURE: http://books.google.de/books?id=aAoAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA30&lpg=PA30&dq=cancer+stewart+xray+1970+radiographs&source=bl&ots=UGZYt0TZGo&sig=ENE9wYZjjNs3Rh2XyptdZwP3Ucw&hl=de&ei=7545Tu6iF8aAOsLrvbMG&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&sqi=2&ved=0CBsQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false

The cancer risk of a child can be doubled by one or two x-rays (10 – 20 mGy) on the pregnant mother before the birth of the child, if it is done in the last months before birth. Atenth of the dose is enough, if the x-ray is made ​​in the first months of life. Source: MacMahon B Prenatal x-ray exposure and childhood cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1962;28(1):173-191. 

No One Escapes Harm: The Essential Story of In-Utero Irradiation http://ratical.org/radiation/CNR/No1Escapes.html

Until 1990 ICRP said it is not necessary to evacuate people, as long as the radiation does not exceed 500 mSv. Then they lowered it from 100 mSv to 20 milli sievert (2000 percent increase for children) which Japan implemented. Which is an equivalent of 50 mammograms: http://books.google.de/books?id=Ber3ENERfGwC&pg=PA343&lpg=PA343&dq=ICRP+40++500mSv&source=bl&ots=IaOqT2MqK2&sig=l3l0MYGe_nKkaXxvFZxkkG8hP5M&hl=de&ei=gc81TpqyI4PfsgajxLG5Ag&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=8&ved=0CE0Q6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=ot%20exceed%20500%20mSv.%20The%20ICRP&f=false

Teratological effects and mutations through radiation – ignored by IAEA, OECD, ICRP, UNSCEAR, SCIENCE – proven by Étienne Wolff in the 1930ies: http://books.google.com/books/about/Th%C3%A8ses_pr%C3%A9sent%C3%A9es_%C3%A0_la_Facult%C3%A9_des.html?id=MQvwcQAACAAJ and: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,862623,00.html and: http://www.ijdb.ehu.es/web/paper.php?doi=041944cg&a=f

The IAEA is everywhere, this watchdog is an advertising agency for the military and the atomic industry. They even gagged the WHO. This is how they work: By mid 1998 first draft of the Guidelines was circulating between IAEA and WHO at the management level. Although there had been a clear agreement between the two organisations at the management level and the work had taken place openly the IAEA withdrew
at that stage strongly advising that the whole issue should either be dropped or revised. The issue was the proposal to lower the action level for implementation from 100mGy to 10mGy dose to the thyroid’s of children.”

I think that increased thyroid cancer incidence of children from irradiated parents would be first manifestation of the induced genomic instability: http://vivretchernobyl.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/presentation-of-rosa-goncharova-genomic-instability-after-chernobyl-prognosis-for-the-coming-generations/

Rosa Goncharova‘s geneticist. In the Belarusian capital Minsk, she directs the laboratory of the Institute of Genetics and Cytology of the Belorussian Academy of Sciences. For decades, the research professor and her team investigated the effects of long-lasting radioactive low-level radiation.

What harm take people living in contaminated areas?

“Must live”, because there are 2600 villages that should relocate. Rosa Gonchrova summarizes the results of their studies (in german):

http://www.hr-online.de/servlet/de.hr.cms.servlet.File/11-042?enc=d3M9aHJteXNxbCZibG9iSWQ9MTIwMTQ3NTImaWQ9NDExMDgxNDEmZm9yY2VEb3dubG9hZD0x

TRANSLATION

“One of the main lessons learned from Chernobyl is the fact that even low doses of ionizing radiation in animals and humans have biological and genetic consequences. This is now proven. They produce damage in the body cells and in the sex cells. Even at a low dose of less than 100 micro Sievert and even years at a tolerated dose of one millisievert were identified in our laboratory genetic changes.”

“About one Milllisievert per year: This is the annual dose limit for people who do not work professionally with ionizing radiations. For occupationally exposed persons in Europe are higher limits. The research team has identified mutations, ie changes in the genes of the nucleus.”

“Man, like every other living being possesses, protection systems, the repair such mutations almost. If there is now under the influence of radioactivity additional mutations, the organism will be charged additionally, he must also fight against it.”

“For these children we have found changes in individual genes. And the worst part is that these children show an increased sensitivity to other unfavorable factors. That is, these children fall ill more frequently than others. Among the unfavorable factors include poor diet, environmental factors, chemical pollution. This is true not only for children but for adults too. They all have an increased sensitivity to other unfavorable factors.”

“In plain English: who spends his life in contaminated areas spend, must, whose immune system is weakened.”

Radioactivity, as it opens the doors for other health problems.

The most dangerous radiation is which is ingested with food. Thus, for example, cesium-137 from the inside to act on the cells, because it displaces the vital potassium in muscle tissue. Or strontium-90, a radionuclide that accumulates in the bone and bone marrow: there can damage blood cells and can cause cancer such as blood.”

- On the question of whether changes in the genetic inheritance of future generations, says geneticist Rose Goncharova: “We demonstrated in our laboratory for the first time that genetic changes over generations may be swept on. We have found after Chernobyl more than 22 animal generations of genetic instability. There are animals that live in the contaminated areas who have to live under the influence of low doses. We have been scientifically proven.”

“This has been proven in one of the most common mammals in the bank vole. The cells of these mice were well comparable with those of humans, says the researcher. Therefore one can transmit many findings to him.”

“Even after 22 generations of mice you can still see changes, mutations. They are inherited. The radioactivity is harmful. So it happens that many offspring do not survive or even many embryos. Those who survive are somehow cope with the situation. But whose genome is unstable, and they also pass into the next generation. And often they are ill. Their whole system is more unstable than in other animals.”

“The mortality rate in these animals is very, very high. Mice produce very many offspring, and therefore they can afford a high death rate. Man, however, will usually produce only one child. In any case, not five, six, seven at once. He also does not bring several generations in a year or during his life to the world. So we can also transmit the results that actually would be transferable to humans, not in all respects to him.”

Which low doses of radiation effects in humans may have, but points to a study that was published in December 2010 in Germany. It states: Within a radius of 35 km around a nuclear plant are fewer girls were born in areas without nuclear power. We investigated the surroundings of 27 facilities in Germany and four in Switzerland. Fewer female births have been noted previously: In regions that were hit by the Chernobyl radioactive precipitation. It is believed that female embryos are more sensitive to radiation and therefore die rather than male.”

“Managerial level of IAEA refuses to endorse the report and refuses to endorse the report but WHO publishes Guidelines in 1999 but IAEA describes them as “DRAFT” and WHO Geneva agrees: http://www.chernobylcongress.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/Baverstock_How_the_UN_works.pdf

The WHO published it: http://www.who.int/ionizing_radiation/pub_meet/Iodine_Prophylaxis_guide.pdf and http://books.google.de/books?id=bJWyU5i-ou0C&pg=PA169&dq=keith+baverstock+Iodine&hl=de&ei=J-QlTqnhEc-aOsik6bkK&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCoQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=keith%20baverstock%20Iodine&f=false

Then: The dose of cesium 137 and strontium 90, which causes stomach cancer is less than 1 Centigray per year. At the same time, the IAEA said that this dose is about 100 per year Centigray. Both results are from the same foundations. In animals, resulting in about 25MsV reparation, there is no lack of effects at radiation doses below 1 Centigray. (P.143 of the book “IPPNW” (peace nobel prize) people’s tribunal 1996 Chernobyl”. quote by Dr. Katsumi Furitsu, Osaka, Japan. I’ve met her:

quote by Dr. Rosalia Bertell, November 1999 issue of The Ecologist, pp. 408-411: http://ratical.org/radiation/NAvictims.html

The main way in which the “radiation protection industry” has succeeded in hugely underrating the ill-health caused by nuclear power is by insisting on a group of extremely restrictive definitions as to what qualifies as a radiation-caused illness statistic. For example, under IAEA’s criteria:

>    If a radiation-caused cancer is not fatal, it is not counted in the IAEA’s figures

>    If a cancer is initiated by another carcenogen, but accelerated or promoted by exposure to radiation, it is not counted.

>    If an auto-immune disease or any non-cancer is caused by radiation, it is not counted.

>    Radiation-damaged embryos or foetuses which result in miscarriage or stillbirth do not count

>    A congenitally blind, deaf or malformed child whose illnesses are are radiation-related are not included in the figures because this is not genetic damage, but rather is teratogenic, and will not be passed on later to the child’s offspring.

>    Causing the genetic predisposition to breast cancer or heart disease does not count since it is not a “serious genetic disease” in the Mendelian sense.

>    Even if radiation causes a fatal cancer or serious genetic disease in a live born infant, it is discounted if the estimated radiation dose is below 100 mSv [mSv= millisievert, a measurement of radiation exposure. One hundred millsievert is the equivalent in radiation of about 100 X-Rays].

>    Even if radiation causes a lung cancer, it does not count if the person smokes — in fact whenever there is a possibility of another cause, radiation cannot be blamed.

>    If all else fails, it is possible to claim that radiation below some designated dose does not cause cancer, and then average over the whole body the radiation dose which has actually been received by one part of the body or even organ, as for instance when radio-iodine concentrates in the thyroid. This arbitrary dilution of the dose will ensure that the 100 mSv cut-off point is nowhere near reached. It is a technique used to dismiss the sickness of Gulf War veterans who inhaled small particles of ceramic uranium which stayed in their lungs for more than two years, and in their bodies for more than eight years, irradiating and damaging cells in a particular part of the body.

Last but not least, we should know, that atomic reactors and atomic bombs are siamese twins:

The Atomic Explosion at an Atomic Reactor – THIS COULD BE THE FINAL BLOW against the atomic industry ONCE AND FOREVER!

Cobalt 60 was detected in Kashiwa shi of Chiba. It proves reactor 3 had an atomic explosion, and it proves gov / tepco are still hiding most important facts.It’s very natural to think there may be way more things concealed: http://10401.blog.fc2.com/blog​-entry-88.htm (now taken offline). But they also found Cobalt 60 in seafood: http://www.scribd.com/doc/65128490/GreenPeace-Fukushima-Seafood-Results

Chernobyl too, but this is IGNORED by today’s science: http://tekknorg.wordpress.​com/2011/03/16/fukushima-c​hernobyl-unofficial-data/ Dr. Chris Busby Believes Fukushima Was A Nuclear Explosion :http://www.rense.com/gener​al93/chrisbsy.htm AND: University of Innsbruck says Chernobyl was primarily caused by a NUCLEAR EXPLOSION – Page 1, left: translation: “… the one Nuclear explosion, and finally a meltdown followed by “: http://physik.uibk.ac.at/p​hysik4/tschernobyl/2-Der_U​nfall.pdf AND: “Some specialists are sure that after the steam explosion a nuclear explosion similar to an atomic bomb explosion occurred in the core of the 4th Unit . Its power had to be much higher than power of the steam explosion. The conclusion of the authors is based on experimental findings established by studying of activities of isotopes 133Xe and 133Xem in the air that existed in the first days after the Chernobyl accident. Their study was carried out in the city Cherepovets that is about 1,000 km in north direction from the Chernobyl NPP. The authors could find that the ratio of activities of these isotopes is the same as in the case of nuclear explosion.” SOURCE: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.​jp/NSRG/reports/kr79/kr79p​df/Malko1.pdfTO ALL: Plese help finding this: “Martinez Val, Jose M., Aragones, Jose M., Mingues, Emilio, Perlado, Jose M., Velarade, Guillermio. An Analysis of the Physical Causes of the Chernobyl Accident. Nuclear Technology. Vol. 90, June 1990, pp.371 – 378.”

Explosion yield of Chernobyl 0,2 – 0,3 KiloTons. Model of the Destruction of the Reactor in the No. 4 Unit of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant – by Kiselev, A. N. | Checherov, K. P.: http://discover-decouvrir.cisti-icist.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/dcvr/ctrl?action=shwart&aix=8&aid=2485630

Jack Harris Central Electricity Generating Board nuclear metallurgist acceptsof his colleague Ross Hesketh’s view of nuclear explosion in Chernobyl: Page7  http://www.spokesmanbooks.com/Spokesman/PDF/91Gifford.pdf More about Ross Hesketh: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/obituaries/ross-hesketh-549777.html

We shall never forget, that the atomic bomb is an invention of the NAZIS and the atomic reactor is an invention of the military: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/07/30/germanys-nuclear-research-founded-by-the-nazis/

Right now, they are working on some new kind of bible, unbelievable:  http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/05/21/the-nuclear-priesthood-a-successor-to-the-iaea/

the forcible pollution by all of us by the nuclear industry / military is irresponsible. Natural radiation is dangerous and leads to spontaneous mutations, and diseases. We can not accept such a thing as a reason to add yet more radiation because it is passed on from living creature to living creature and from generation to generation.

maybe they can destroy the democracy, make us sick. But not our courage.

With kind regards to all of you

Jan Hemmer

Please support: http://www.criirad.org

Daily, uncensored, 1st hand Fukushims news: http://fukushima-diary.com/

and the IPPNW: http://news.ippnw.de/index.php?id=64

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

ONE radiograph during pregnancy: 20 % increase for cancer probability before the child is 10 years old. Two radiographs during pregnancy: 28 %. Three: 70 %. FOUR:…. 100 PERCENT. There is NO SAFE LEVEL OF RADIATION EXPOSURE: http://books.google.de/books?id=aAoAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA30&lpg=PA30&dq=cancer+stewart+xray+1970+radiographs&source=bl&ots=UGZYt0TZGo&sig=ENE9wYZjjNs3Rh2XyptdZwP3Ucw&hl=de&ei=7545Tu6iF8aAOsLrvbMG&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&sqi=2&ved=0CBsQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false

No One Escapes Harm: The Essential Story of In-Utero Irradiation http://ratical.org/radiation/CNR/No1Escapes.html

The X-rays and Health Project (XaHP): http://www.x-raysandhealth.org/

THE PETKAU EFFECT: http://www.nuclearreader.info/chapter3.html

PET / CT scanner. These are systems that simultaneously do (X-ray) computer tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) of a whole person. The PET is a nuclear medicine three-dimensional method in which positron emitters are used – mostly fluorine-18 – with a half-life of 1.8 hours (or full decay time of 18 hrs). For a single whole-body examination while the effective dose climbs to 10 millisieverts (mSv) for CT alone to 25 mSv. The organ doses are correspondingly: bone marrow 29 mSv, 27 mSv lung, ovary 33 mSv, 36 mSv intestine, stomach 29 mSv. For comparison, the threshold for the population at a nuclear power plant is 0.3 mSv (effective) per year for occupationally Exposed 20 mSv per year: http://www.strahlentelex.de/MedizinischeStrahlenbelastung.htm

radioactive iron Fe-59 given to 820 pregnant women (between 10th and 35th pregnancy week). The women knew nothing about it. Result: High malignancy rates in offspring: Acute lymphatic leukemia, synovial sarcoma, lymphosarcoma, primary liver carcinoma. http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/radiation/dir/mstreet/commeet/pm04/pl4brf/pl4brd.txt

BEIR? ICRP? IAEA? SAFE LEVELS? Here are your facts, by a former NRC scientists and whistleblower: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/GreenDereg.html

K.Z. Morgan (former ICRP chairman) “there is no dose of radiatoon so low that the risk of malignancy is zero” QUOTE page 30, right, although the ICRP claimed the opposite until 1960http://books.google.de/books?id=aAoAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA30&lpg=PA30&dq=cancer+and+low+level+ionizing+radiation+morgan+k.z.&source=bl&ots=UGZYt-R5El&sig=u136wezO8Tvy5YZE-bfJhYjB-AQ&hl=de&ei=GHM5TtXrOoTKswbx4vUY&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCAQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=there%20is%20no%20dose%20of%20radiatoon%20so%20low%20that%20the%20risk%20of%20malignancy%20is%20zero&f=false

Karl Morgan “There is no safe level of exposure and there is no dose of radiation so low that the risk of a malignancy is zero”:  http://books.google.de/books?id=9-8EkIhxeK0C&pg=PA18&lpg=PA18&dq=%E2%80%9CThere+is+no+safe+level+of+exposure+and+there+is+no+dose+of+radiation+so+low+that+the+risk+of+a+malignancy+is+zero%E2%80%9D&source=bl&ots=GZXG5ZVK0i&sig=vVvf-pFUOPAPISPaBR5IWmVzlV8&sa=X&ei=AnUyUIq4L6Ss0QWtzoDgDA&ved=0CBQQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%E2%80%9CThere%20is%20no%20safe%20level%20of%20exposure%20and%20there%20is%20no%20dose%20of%20radiation%20so%20low%20that%20the%20risk%20of%20a%20malignancy%20is%20zero%E2%80%9D&f=false

more: http://books.google.de/books?id=QunaUpeENl4C&printsec=frontcover&hl=de&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

“As Alice Stewart mentioned in her talk, there are two categories of human illness that everyone agrees can be caused by exposure to atomic radiation even at very low levels. They are (1) cancers of all kinds, and also (2) genetic mutations — which can be caused right down to the lowest levels of radiation exposure. Most scientists believe that these harmful effects are linearly related to the dose, so that if the dose is doubled, the number of cancers and genetic defects will also be doubled, and if the dose is cut in half, only half as many cancers and genetic defects will be seen. It is important to realize that if a damaging dose is spread out among a very large population, so that each individual receives only a very small portion of the total dose, the number of cancers and genetic defects is in no way diminished. Thus, in the case of radioactive pollution, dilution is no solution at all.” http://www.ratical.org/radiation/WorldUraniumHearing/AliceStewart.html#MUTATE

“According to the ICRP in 1991, just 5 mSv to the testes could cause damage to offspring – yet this dose was permitted yearly to members of the public, and ten times more was permitted to nuclear workers, in all countries prior to 1990. It continues today to be permitted yearly for nuclear workers in most countries.” http://iicph.org/victims_of_the_nuclear_age

ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection) protects atomic industry NOT human health: Until 1990 ICRP said it is not necessary to evacuate people, as long as the radiation does not exceed 500 mSv. Then they lowered it from 100 mSv to 20 milli sievert (2000 percent increase for children) which Japan implemented. Which is an equivalent of 50 mammograms: http://books.google.de/books?id=Ber3ENERfGwC&pg=PA343&lpg=PA343&dq=ICRP+40++500mSv&source=bl&ots=IaOqT2MqK2&sig=l3l0MYGe_nKkaXxvFZxkkG8hP5M&hl=de&ei=gc81TpqyI4PfsgajxLG5Ag&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=8&ved=0CE0Q6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=ot%20exceed%20500%20mSv.%20The%20ICRP&f=false

NOW we know, there is only one tolerance limit: ZERO – the Reference Embryo: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/03/11/atomic-alert-in-japan/

ICRP versus ECRR: http://www.euradcom.org/2009/lesvostranscript.htm

and: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/07/15/less-girls-are-born-because-of-nuclear-power-global-population-growth-control/

The excess cancer risk from obstetric X-ray examination was directly related to the fetal dose: http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2870%2991782-4/abstract

5 mGy – 50 mGy = 5000% Leukemia increase for children: http://cel.webofknowledge.com/InboundService.do?SID=Q2kiGlBbfFgNPfKfkLo&product=CEL&UT=A1972N025000001&SrcApp=CR&Init=Yes&action=retrieve&customersID=Highwire&Func=Frame&SrcAuth=Highwire&IsProductCode=Yes&mode=FullRecord

The dosage given for diagnostic radiography is carciogenic at any rate for the foetus: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2009217/?page=9

http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2870%2991782-4/abstract

Life-Upgrade.com

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

The Nuclear Resarch Center or Institute for Nuclear and Energy Engineering (Institut für Kern- und Energietechnik (IKET) http://www.iket.kit.edu/index.php) is working on TRANSMUTATION. But before that, they were directed by some “interesting” people with a dark history:

-> Alfred Boetcher Scientific Director Nuclear Research Center Jülich, 1960 to 1966. Before 1945, director of Degussa and SS commander in Leiden, Holland. More: http://al.uni-koeln.de/Anti-G8-Buendnis_Koeln/Atomfusion_Ueberblick.pdf – quote: “The convicted SS Lieutenant-Colonel of Leiden (Netherlands), Alfred Boettcher was, from 1960 to 1966 President of the Nuclear Research Centre
Jülich and was responsible for building links with the apartheid state of South Africa and responsible for the military dictatorship in Brazil.”

There is  high radiation caused in the research reactor “Jülich” map near the town “Karlsruhe”.  In the 1970ies few scandals happened there and they need to be inspected again. Jülich came into service in 1963. It is a pebble bed reactor. It went offline in 1978 after the worst case scenario nearly happend. Source

The moderator inside of Jülich is Graphit – just like in Chernobyl. The electric output was 15 MW. Due to it’s high radiation it is not possible to transfer the reactor into a waste disposal. Jülich is under a sarcophagus – for the next hundred years. It’s Germany’s Micro-Chernobyl. More: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2009/07/23/high-radiation-in-german-reactor/

-> William Groth, employs in Jülich in the 1960s, director of the Institute of Physics and Chemistry in Bonn and a member of the Board of the German Atomic Forum. 1936-1945 Political leader of the NSDAP and staff at the Army Ordnance Department on the atomic bomb project. More: http://al.uni-koeln.de/Anti-G8-Buendnis_Koeln/Atomfusion_Ueberblick.pdf quote: “The Nazi leader Wilhelm Groth research before 1945 under the Nazis to the atomic bomb in order to continue the war in Jülich.”

-> Walter Schnurr 1956 to 1970 Scientific Director of the Nuclear Research Center Karlsruhe and mediator in the construction of military Atucha reactor in Argentina, worked in 1945 as a weapons specialist at IG Farben (manufacturers of Zyklon B poison gas against Jews: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IG_Farben) MORE: http://books.google.de/books?id=KAsAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA34&lpg=PA34&dq=walter+Schnurr++karlsruhe+nazi&source=bl&ots=SO2aySjqrf&sig=OwoPcPMBTop4QCPQeeREDMdgdT0&hl=de&ei=2dYzTpqOJ8zLtAak1cG5Ag&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=10&ved=0CF8Q6AEwCQ#v=onepage&q=walter%20Schnurr%20%20karlsruhe%20nazi&f=false

“nuclear physicists, nuclear scientists and explosives experts along with the physicist E. Bagge Diebner of the Society for nuclear energy and shipping (GKSS) in Geesthacht (on the former site of Dynamit Nobel): Both had, as Heisenberg and his group, the uranium project, the secret nuclear weapons program under the Nazis and the SS Army Ordnance Department worked, but were second or 3rd Garnish. Otto Hahn, Heisenberg and von Weizsäcker did not achieve the 1st nuclear explosion, but Diebner. He will was the first one, in 1945 in Thüringen (Germany) – and succeded with a “small” nuclear explosion in the concentration. Camp prisoners were used as experimental subjects and killed.

Diebner and Bagge never ceased to occupy themselves with nuclear weapons. They have the “Göttingen appeal” of the German nuclear physicists (including those from the NS-uranium project) is not the only one signed. This commitment, “not to manufacture, testing, or to participate in the use of nuclear weapons” would run counter to their research. They gave out for the GKSS the journal Nuclear Energy, in which their research results during the Nazi period were presented with pride.” SOURCE: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/12/02/the-money-machine-atomic-power-67-e-per-kwh/

# Sources: german magazine lunapark21 12/2011, p.46 (http://www.lunapark21.net/) & literature: Holger Strohm, Friedlich in die Katastrophe. Eine Dokumentation über Atomkraftwerke, Frankfurt 1981, S. 886: http://www.amazon.de/Friedlich-Katastrophe-Eine-Dokumentation-Atomkraftwerke/dp/3894017481/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1312018768&sr=8-1

- http://www.iket.kit.edu/270.php: during the process PUO² will be created, which needs to be stored <- no solution for that.

More about TRANSAMUTATION:

- On http://www.iket.kit.edu/211.php they write that minor activity SHOULD be achieved – so, they are not sure! And: There is only REDUCTION <- it’s still there!

It can do nothing against emissions like Tritum, emitting 24 hrs a day from cooling towers, nothing against radiation in the food chain, nothing against Strontium 90 in the bones and teeth of children, and so on…

There is a nightmare “solution” and it is in the making since the 70ies. It’s not Transmutation: http://tekknorg.wordpress.​com/2011/05/21/the-nuclear​-priesthood-a-successor-to​-the-iaea/

There is atomic waste of the NAZIs in ASSE II – the underground waste disposal of Germany: http://www.sueddeutsche.de/wissen/atommuelllager-asse-phantom-einer-nazi-atombombe-1.1119070 More about ASSE II: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2009/09/19/creepy-atomic-waste-disposal/

Life-Upgrade.com

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

THE ATOM FORTRESS

SECOND STATUS REPORT OF THE IIASA PROJECT ON ENERGY SYSTEMS 1975:

http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Admin/PUB/Documents/RR-76-001.pdf

Quote page 27: “The idea is to install large-scale nuclear power there on the basis of the breeder principle (…) This would allow for the meaningful harvesting of uranium from the sea waters of the passing ocean current (…)

AND page 240: A WASTE DISPOSAL for RADIOACTIVE WASTE: “Scale view of Canton “Energy Island” with its presumed geological structure. The full lines under the power station barges represent permanent, drilled radioactive waste sink holes, and the dashed extensions the free trajectories of the sinking capsules.”

MORE:  http://www.cge.uevora.pt/energia/marchetti/Fire3.doc

page 15 quote: “In 1973 I was invited in Japan (…) Since the oceans contain 4.5 billion tons of uranium and their waters turns up at a rate of about one meter per year, simple estimates show that one can go flat for ten thousand years. The Japanese were fascinated by this energetic independence (…).”

The authorCesare Marchetti” was closest staff to Wolf Häfele – a german Swabian pastor’s son, Physicist, advocate of fast breeder technology – AND RESPONSIBLE FOR: The invention of trivialization of nuclear accidents: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/05/22/the-invention-of-trivialization-of-nuclear-accidents-made-in-germany-1975/

thousand men were needed for each island. The fuel from the ocean and prepared in breeder reactors would have been transported to the countries of the world by ship (max. 300,000 tons).

A crazed action. characteristic are the words “soon / almost / in preparation / almost hardly likely / except for a small percentage / in preparation / if / however / no immediate risk / residual risk

This is atomic science, atomic industry. A complete failure.

Life-Upgrade.com

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

The Chernobyl Exhibition / 25 years. Along with Chernobyl liquidator Iwan Volchanski (Ukraine) and Dr Sofia Beriozkina from Belarus (Gomel region). In Rottweil, Germany, on July 10th 2011. My footage:

more information & photos:

http://www.ibb-d.de/tschernobyl_aktuelles.html

http://www.willy-brandt-haus.de/cms/beitrag/1003186/111900

The exhibition took place in various cities in Germany, Austria, Switzerland and the Netherlands. I was impressed by the names of the irradiated villages, which (depending on your point of view / angle) vanished into darkness or could be seen. I had the chance to talk with a liquidator and a doctor, and to talk about civil society as the only hope we have.

regards,

Life-Upgrade.com

 

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) was replaced by: As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP): To satisfy the ALARP principle, measures necessary to reduce risk must be taken until or unless the cost of those measures, whether money, time or trouble is disproportionate to the reduction in risk.” PAGE 170 – by UK Departement of Energy & Climatechange – QUOTE:

http://www.decc.gov.uk/assets/decc/11/meeting-energy-demand/consents-planning/nps2011/1925-appl-of-sust-of-revised-draft-en6.pdf

basically: Money over Health – a licence to kill. In the beginning the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle was turned against the atomic industry. It said, that radiation exposure has to be held as low as possible, that means as low as rasonably achievable. But hydrogen bombs cause much radiation.The ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection) turned around this principle (after the first hydrogen bomb explosion in 1954) – so that the ALARA principle is now working FOR the atomic industry, even if a reactor crashes next to you. ICRP said, that ALARA does not refer to accidents. Basically this means:

When an accident happens (an atomic reactor crash, for example) the whole point of Status Quo is that the people are contaminated with radiation.

They can irradiate you and do not compensate you – and if they do, they do it with your money. No reactor is assured, mind you.

Used in Belarus (Most Chernobyl affected country in the world) and Japan (Fukushima).

EXELON nuclear (US company) talking about ALARA:  http://www.decc.gov.uk/ass​ets/decc/11/meeting-energy​-demand/consents-planning/​nps2011/1925-appl-of-sust-​of-revised-draft-en6.pdf

Remember: This is the only VALID and OFFICIAL angenda for compensation during an atomic accident!

 

regards,

Life-Upgrade.com

Read Full Post »

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

Nuclear facilities emit considerable amounts of tritium which makes the water radioactive. By cooling towers and other ways. This is the reason for rising children cancer rates near nuclear reactors:

Chance for children carcinogenic tritium emissions from each reactor every second: 100% – first two pages are from a 300 pages long german document (not for the public): http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/Tritium-DWK-LaHague-ChildrenCancer.pdf

La Hague emits 1000,000 Curie EACH YEAR! 1 Curie per km² = 37,000 Bequerel per m². AND: 20 Bequerel per Kg IN the body cause Heart Prolems and can lead to death: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/09/25/european-union-kills-legallly-150000-people-each-year-with-irradiated-food-in-germany/

Because reactors depend on heavy water as a moderator, they release larger amounts of tritium to the environment than light water reactors (…) Tritium is a carcinogen, mutagen, teratogen and developmental toxin. It becomes incorporated into DNA and disrupts the genetic code of men’s and women’s reproductive cells: http://www.iicph.org/files/IICPH-Final-Statement-re-Darlington-NNPP-May-17-20… – current Guideline and Drinking Water Quality Standard for tritium is 7,000 Bq/L, which is based on the permissible ICRP dose limit of 1 mSv/year (lowered to 0.1 mSv in water). This “standard” corresponds to a risk of 350 excess fatal cancers per million people from just one year’s consumption of drinking water, not a lifetime (70 years) 300 million people living in the US: 105,000 DEATHS PER YEAR x 30 years = 3,150,000 murdered people by the peaceful atom! Multiplied x global = weapons of mass destruction.

TEPCO & FUKUSHIMA: H-3 (TRITIUM)= 390 bq = 10540 pci per liter http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/nu/fukushima-np/f1/images/2012sampling/intake_canal_120808-e.pdf

Annual averages of tritium concentrations in air measured at distances from nuclear power stations in Canada:

http://www.ehjournal.net/content/8/1/43/figure/F1

http://www.ehjournal.net/content/8/1/43/figure/F2

from: http://www.ehjournal.net/content/8/1/43

Sources:

http://www.fraw.org.uk/mei/archive/magnox_a1_28.pdf

http://pgs.ca/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/TRITIUM.Fairlie.2010.IJOEH_July10_Fairlie1.pdf

http://www.odwac.gov.on.ca/standards_review/tritium/Tritium_Radiation_Risks_Additional_Note_for_ODWAC_Fairlie.pdf

http://www.hse.gov.uk/newreactors/presentations/250609/ian-fairlie.pdf

http://www.ippnw.de/commonFiles/pdfs/Atomenergie/factsheet_risiken_normalbetrieb.pdf

And this will continue with FUSION ENERGY:

http://www.cyberacteurs.org/cyberactions/presentation.php?id=337

Translation / quote: Tritium is a radioactive gas, highly toxic if inhaled. It falls to earth with precipitation in the form of tritiated water. The tritium atoms can replace hydrogen atoms (about half the atoms of the human body are composed of hydrogen) and in the form of tritiated water, the isotope of hydrogen can enter the food chain and set in the body, leading to damage and mutations in DNA. ASN in its “White Paper Tritium” published on Aug 7th 2010, revealed that they had underestimated the possible consequences of this radionuclide on the environment and living organisms, the risk estimate was incorrect, that further research was needed. The authors of this paper conclude that “the re-evaluation of the toxicity of tritium requires to revisit the practices on releases and storage of tritiated waste,” giving due warnings of long-standing Commission for Research and Information independent radioactivity CRIIRAD. Studies of the confinement and release of tritium in ITER have not been adequately carried out while the construction of ITER is already underway! This finding is unacceptable, the studies must be conducted in priority to any continuation of the project.

regards,

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 80 other followers