Archive for June, 2011



What IAEA, UNSCEAR, ICRP and WHO ignore:

1927 Herman J Mueller discovered in 1927 (!) the following: ARTIFICIAL TRANSMUTATION OF THE GENE by radiation – he got the The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1946:


1928 the ICRP was founded. No coincidence: http://www.icrp.org/publication.asp?id=1928%20Recommendations

the ICRP kills 150,000 people per year with irradiated food standards: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/09/25/european-union-kills-legallly-150000-people-each-year-with-irradiated-food-in-germany/

nuclear industry is based on “eugenics” and “atomic darwinism”: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/10/01/the-atomic-darwinism/

The BIMODAL effect of low radiation on health – proven by Burlakova 1996, ignored by science and IAEA, today’s science ONLY looks for LINEAR dose effects. They use the model of HIGH radiation (acute syndrome) on LOW radiation effects (cancer, diseases, mutation – …) – result: ALL radiation victims are and latency in general ignored! Please share: http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/BurlakovaChernobyl-Belarus.pdf

Page 2: “Table 1 Incidence of 12 classes of disease among liquidators per 100 thousand people” – shows massive increase of diseases. Page 6 “relation between effects at low-intensive dosage and dose rate” and Page 11 “the PRESENCE of linear or linear-quadratic dependency IS NOT obligatory for the cases of diseases and deaths from malignant neoplasm at low doses”: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Burlakova.pdf

“Presently the international organizations (WHO, IAEA) recognize as the main cause of increase of thyroid cancer in liquidators and children population after the accident their irradiation with radioactive iodine, I-131. The rest of diseases, they suppose, are provoked by psycho-emotional reactions. ” http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Burlakova.pdf The bimodal dependence of effects on dose was
revealed for all studied parameters. Namely, effects increased at low doses, reached maximum (for low doses), then decreased (in some cases the effect sign reversed) and thereafter increased with the increase of

“What should WHO have done after Chernobyl?” asked Dr Nabarro, Acting Director-General of the World Health Organization in 2002. He received an immediate reply: Convene a “Scientific Working Group on “Ionizing Radiation and Genetics” similar to the one in 1956 but add the words “and Genomic Instability”. It was in response to this question, that the World Health Organization convened a study group in Geneva in 1956, composed of Nobel prize winner in genetics, Professor Muller, and other luminaries of international repute in the field…Together, these scientists reminded us that «the genome is the most valuable treasure of human kind. It determines the life of our descendants and the harmonious development of the future generations. As experts we confirm that the health of future generations is threatened by the expansion of the nuclear industry and the growth of the quantity of radioactive sources. We also consider the fact of appearance of new mutations observed in people to be fatal for them and for their descendants». Since then, a new area of research in genetics has opened up: genomic instability brought about, in particular, by radiation.” page 26 http://independentwho.org/media/Documents_IW/Forum_Radioprotection_English_Abstracts_IW_2012.pdf

Teratological effects and mutations through radiation – ignored by IAEA, OECD, ICRP, UNSCEAR, SCIENCE – proven by Étienne Wolff in the 1930ies: http://books.google.com/books/about/Th%C3%A8ses_pr%C3%A9sent%C3%A9es_%C3%A0_la_Facult%C3%A9_des.html?id=MQvwcQAACAAJ and: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,862623,00.html and: http://www.ijdb.ehu.es/web/paper.php?doi=041944cg&a=f

and here is another one THE PETKAU EFFECT, 1972: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/03/14/low-radiation-the-petkau-effect/



Read Full Post »


the biggest banks of the world are the biggest money givers of the atomic industry – along with the military.




Read Full Post »


Here is the National Press Conference of the french INDEPENDENT Criirad-Commission on Radiation & Fukushima: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rkcT9ScUyhY

English transcript: http://www.criirad.org/actualites/dossier2011/japon_bis/en_anglais/criirad11-47ejapan.pdf

Don’t trust the IAEA, here is the reason why:

W.H.O. Secretary General “Margaret Chan” admits for the first time: RADIATION IS ALWAYS DANGEROUS

Japan’s 2nd Fukushima

The nuclear industry is the military / 原子力産業は軍事です

German Greens: Cancel secret gag agreement between IAEA and W.H.O.!

IAEA and TEPCO: The devil is relying on the Bible



Read Full Post »



“Chernobyl certificates” that provide the owners with a number of benefits – anulled in 2007: http://spring96.org/en/news/50403

Excerpt from hard to get paper “The Main Scientific Reports” – International Congress “The World after Chernobyl” Minsk (Belarus), 1996 – by russian atomic physicist in the former Soviet Union, Prof. Vassili Nesterenko (BELRAD Institute, Minsk: http://www.belrad-institute.org/) He was one of the last independet scientists in Belarus and a liquidator during the Chernobyl catastrophe (atomic reactor explosion in 1986). Belarus adapted a program in the mid 90ies which calls irradiated areas of 1 – 5 C/km² as clean and stopped money. The same will happen in Fukushima.

EDIT: July 12th 2011:

Minami Soma city is asking all the evacuees to come back to their land:

The crime is happening right now!

Simple, but gruesome, the same thing in Belarus:

Or download the whole presentation as PDF file: http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/NesterenkoChernobyl-Belarus.pdf

Here is the french CORE program – an aid program, that kills: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/03/18/core-a-chernobyl-aid-program-that-kills/ – which heavily relies on the mid90ies development mentioned above.

Belarus struck of 1000 villages from the radiation map: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2008/05/14/government-1000-villages-struck-off-from-being-contaminated/

Radiation maps: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2008/07/10/radiation-maps-from-belarus-chernobyl/

I met Nesterenko in person in April 2006, in Geseke / Germany, during a Belarussian-German meeting “20 Years of Chernobyl”. Along with Prof. Alexey Jablokov (whom I met on April 9th 2011) he published this study:

Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment (1,000,000 deahts):

by  Alexey V. Yablokov,Vassily B. Nesterenko,Alexey V. Nesterenko


And now, Belarus builds it’s first atomic power plant, where 72% of the Chernobyl fallout contaminated 25% of the country:


More: Chernobyl: The Main Scientific Reports



Read Full Post »


Iran’s Bushehr reactor is connected to the power grid: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-14779227

Israel und US plan attack: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-15595657

On June 23rd President Obama declared his plan for withdrawal of US forces from Afghanistan. And later, also from Iraq.


Because a US led atomic attack against Iran will cause fallout, which will also affect Afghanistan and Iraq.

Projected Casualties Among U.S. Military Personnel and Civilian Populations from the Use of Nuclear Weapons Against Hard and Deeply Buried Targets:


The IPPNW (peace nobel prize 1985) says, that

  • six B61-11 earth-penetrating atomic weapons with a yield of 340 kt each will be dropped according to HPAC / Pentagon scenario
  • dropped on: Isfahan and Natnaz (Iran)
  • Result: In 48 hours -> 2,6 million deaths, fallout on India, Pakistan, Afghanistan (evacuation of the troops?), 10,5 million people injured.

At the same time Iran is trying to run it’s atomic reactors (build by russian company ROSATOM – builds now in Belarus, most Chernobyl affected country) – which are offline since the outbreak of the computervirus Stuxnet:


If the atomic reactors are running and producing Plutonium, Iran fulfills these conditions:

  • 1st, the 2002 Nuclear Posture Review
  • 2nd, the National Security Strategies of 2002
  • 3rd, the 2006 National Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction

These 3 papers will be used as a reason to start a war.

Plus: The atomic facilities of Iran are underground. Which makes them invulnerable against conventional attacks.

1981 – Israelian conventional airstrike against ABOVEGROUND Iraq atomic reactor Osirak: http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/june/7/newsid_3014000/3014623.stm

2007 – Israelian conventional airstrike against ABOVEGROUND Syrian atomic reactor: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/14/washington/14weapons.html

So, the HPAC program used by the US Pentagon recommends the use of six B-61 atomic weapons agains Iran – each digging 7 meters deep and then explode.

B 61 atomic bomb: http://books.google.de/books?id=YgAAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA78&lpg=PA78&dq=pentagon+less+fallout+b-61&source=bl&ots=kYo5w2KxVZ&sig=M2UcN_1fIzSsdPkB-y2Nx8wEIGQ&hl=de&ei=csAxTr2XMYbesgaamYjpBg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CCAQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false

A civil atomic program – supported by the IAEA – is the base for a military atomic program. If this military atomic program violates the proliferation: A war is inevitable. So, the IAEA plays a key role in Preparing Wars.


US forces pull back is an evacuation:


Medical consequences of a nuclear attack against Iran:


How Nuclear Energy takes YOU as HOSTAGE:




Read Full Post »


Original belarusian article: http://nmnby.eu/news/analytics/3172.html

Help with translation is appreciated:

translation (google):

Atomic Darwinism – by Constantine Skuratowicz, Minsk, Belarus. June 7th 2011

In the 25th anniversary of the Chernobyl disaster Chernobyl Children’s fund manager Gennady Grushevoi planned together with the witnesses, the Belarusians to travel to Europe. The aim was to remind the Europeans that Chernobyl has not been overcome. That this can happen in every country.

The occasion was the anniversary and the authorities’ intention to build a voluntarist in Belarus’s own station. Without consulting with the people and in defiance of enemies. Alarms added accident at the Japanese station.

Immediate impression of the author’s meetings with interested people in Germany and Switzerland do not lose color, but have already managed to take the form of “thinking about”.

It is impossible in normal circumstances to force people to take back-breaking solutions for them. In those particular cases where the erroneous decisions affect the lives of thousands and millions of people. And it is absolutely impermissible to turn these millions of displaced foreign hostages defy solutions. Director of the Chernobyl Victor Bryukhanov considered himself innocent of the catastrophe occurred. His fault was that he was the director of the station, on which stood the reactor, which is on all the available technical documentation could not explode under any circumstances. But it exploded.

Director planted.

Prime Minister Nikolai Ryzhkov, having received full information about the incident, exclaimed: what do we have and this grief? Civil defense employees of Pripyat had to remove from the work, as they “drove radiation” on the technologies described in the textbooks of the 50s.

There is a simple situation where the desired result is almost always comes after the realization of reason. And if you do not come, then do not worry, you can and repeat. But there are in the nature of such complex systems in which the observed causal relationships as would serve as a cover-up of deeper relationships and consequences.


In the Soviet Union with kindergarten children were taught not to fear anything, and always tell (the authorities) the truth. But it could do brave the dark by his own comrades. So be afraid. Spies should expose, but also fear. For example, to not issue an official secret mainland spy, pretending to be affectionate cat.

Were brave and afraid at the same time. Therefore, survived. Otherwise people would be reduced in the name of obscure ideals. Remember: as a die for all of this?!

There are, of course, extreme situations where life is completely worthless. For example, in the war. But not for nothing that mankind has strived for peace and have a row that decade, the world lives in relative certainty about the fact that World War III may not be. Although military men in this respect are busybodies in almost every country. First come up with new weapons, and then protections against it. And at the same time argue that military-technical progress, leaving crumbs budgets of different levels, enables the development and defense-related industries.

In the case of nuclear power – the absolute truth. The reactors were built to produce material suitable for filling bombs and civilians along the way apartments are provided with electricity and nearly free heat. Aside from the cost of equipment itself, which in a country where we lived before, no one had ever thought. Abnormal situation. If, for example, imagine that in times of dobibleyskie copying and darts for the soldiers brought to the tribe of such costs, and social life on earth would not develop to the present perfect forms.

Although the wild and today is enough. Take the same atomic energy. Currently, the share of energy produced at the plant who is 10, who has 20, and from whom, and more interest in the country’s energy. And so it is difficult to refuse them. Germany, for example, passed a law to stop the reactor, with a long life, and proceeded to execute it. But there was a global financial crisis and the government suspended the process. Complex, quite frankly, because the energy necessary for all. The problem of economic, technological, political, in the end. But the continued construction of new power plants will reduce even the current level of nuclear safety in the world and turn into a hostage “peaceful atom,” the whole state.

But mostly the problem of morality. You can not make everyone a vegetarian, could not be banned from all plant foods on the grounds that it is very harmful or very useful for the organism. People are different – you can not brush them with the same brush. And with the NPP is exactly what happens. Even worse.

Largest in the history of U.S. nuclear power plant accident was the “Three Mile Island,” March 28, 1979. From the zone of contamination forced the evacuation of about 200 thousand people. The cleaning of the second power, almost completely destroyed in the accident, took a whole 12 years and cost about 1 billion USD, which is actually bankrupt the company – owner of the station.

After 6 years there was an accident at the Chernobyl NPP, and a quarter of a century after the Chernobyl disaster victims a natural disaster became a Japanese Fukushima-1.

Anything in the world, there are about 100 nuclear power plants. We can therefore say that accidents and disasters do not happen to them less than a circus juggler fall on the carpet plates. In fact, more often. Because after the incident at the plant NRX in Canada which occurred December 12, 1952, which in history was awarded to number 1, Fukushima accident was the 28th in a row. And that’s not counting the accidents at the enterprises of the nuclear fuel cycle.

In the world there are areas with abnormally high radioactive background, where people live quite comfortably. But this took care of evolution, which is in continuation of a long time took away the human material with suitable properties. We can say that the vast majority of people they do not possess. That is, it is likely that with further increase of radioactivity among them will be a natural selection. Call it an atomic Darwinism – as elsewhere – but he will accompany the rise due to increasing radiation sickness and death.

It is thus manifested in the nature of non-obvious causal link – random in shape, but it is absolutely legitimate.

If there is no alternative to nuclear power, then the alternative is no alternative … Humanity is likened to a rat in an old experience. When an animal gets weaker and pleasant shock, in an effort to get it more fun, faster presses a button nose and die with pleasure.

However, there are things and quite definite. Each of us exists a threshold rate of radiation, which occur after genetic abnormalities in the development of the offspring, death. There is no doubt that the background radiation will increase the degree of contamination of food, natural objects – too. With this in mind we can construct a model. Set when the level becomes unbearable for the first 10, 15, 20% of the population, when the first signs of irreversible changes in the gene pool.

A lot of unscientific fantasy has become common practice. Much of the scientific theories crumbled into dust.

There are too many uncertainties. Maybe that’s why a rational Europe, primarily Germany, after Fukushima began to demand their governments to complete rejection of nuclear energy. Addressing the century turned into the plane of practical politics. And in Europe it is not the exclusive prerogative of the wise men in government and “strong economic managers of monopoly.”

There’s a real policy making by the people


Belarus as hostage by russian atomic reactor: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/06/20/nuclear-energy-takes-you-as-hostage/

World Health Organisation: Every radiation is dangerous: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/05/12/w-h-o-secretary-general-chan-admits-for-the-first-time-in-52-years-radiation-is-always-dangerous/



Read Full Post »


Belarus and Russia signed the construction contract of the first Belarusian nuclear reactor while Fukushima exploded:


ROSATOM – The Builder of Chernobyl RBMK builds the VVER reactor in Ostrovets, Belarus. Here is an overview: “radionuclides content in the soil samples taken at the Ostrovets site is within the following limits:

- Cesium-137 – 1,0 – 2,5 kBq/m2 (0,027 – 0,067 CU/km2)

- Strontium-90 – 0,17 – 0,37 kBq/m2 (0,005 – 0,01 CU/km2)

- Plutonium-238,239,240 – 0,026 – 0,074 kBq/m2 (0,0007 – 0,002 CU/km2)” http://www.wien.gv.at/umweltschutz/bekanntmachungen/pdf/belarus-kurzueberblick.pdf

following radionuclides in the
underground waters is possible:
tritium Cwa.rel (max) = 220 – 510 in 4 – 6 years;
strontium-90 Cwa.rel (max) = 760 – 7600 in 90 – 150 years;
Iodine-129 Cwa.rel (max) = 3,7 – 4.4 in 20 years;
technetium-99 Cwa.rel (max) = 2,9 – 4,5 in 6 – 10 years. http://www.wien.gv.at/umweltschutz/bekanntmachungen/pdf/belarus-ueberblick.pdf

Belarus believes that after 6 to 10 years of construction, the electricity from the nuclear power plant Ostrovets can be sold to the E.U. This is extremely naive.

Neither the construction nor the maintenance nor the operation nor the fuel cycle is self controlled by Belarus. It’s totally owned by Russia and it’s company ROSATOM.

update: New aggreement between ROSATOM and BELARUS, Oct. 11th 2011:


This is the reactor type: http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:trKxzd3OPuUJ:atomeromu.hu/download/1675/AES%25202006%2520reaktor.pdf+AES-2006+design+reactor&hl=de&gl=de&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEEShuZ1o2mzFCm_Ct7ckD9Q7GHVa8bgg0HiSczPjYEjfTXChDvS5dY8XPfhZzool6BW5tBqHaNdoJwQoGbOtepjK6ImHwLJYqNv1eajLKE06SylZQ4hXV6wvjhYLjcK4eZ2jy4fYw&sig=AHIEtbRrhYZsjEMwNSY-G2F5OFdEWZh8Wg&pli=1


Anti Nuclear in Belarus, SUMMARY: http://vk.com/club25156154

The interest-free loan from Russia in the amount of 2 billion €uro is only a beginning. Exactly from this moment on the hyperinflation began:


Like in Olkiluoto, where AREVA started to build it’s european EPR Reactor in 2005: Costs exploded (the bavarian bank of Germany gave 2 billion €uro and lost it. In 2005: 2 billion €uro, then 3, then 4 and 5 billion €uros), german Company SIEMENS left catastrophe operator AREVA alone, because of this. Now, Finland owns a ruined construction site with an incomplete junk reactor buildinghttp://www.greenpeace.org/international/Global/international/planet-2/report/2009/2/epr-the-french-reactor.pdf other genius actions by AREVA: irradiating state Niger in Africa: http://www.greenpeace.org/international/Global/international/publications/nuclear/2010/AREVA_Niger_report.pdf

NOW Belarus is transforming into a 2nd generation of some kind of Atomic State (Before: Chernobyl, Now: Reactor). Which means everyone who speaks against atomic power is an enemy of the state. New developments are under way: Belarusian officials detain over 450 after rally: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5ht93_cpV6vNi4Z5PsSGCiTOtxLGQ?docId=e6806b5fd8b240bbae405d2bfd098e74&index=0

More photos: http://toxaby.livejournal.com/514571.html?view=11193611

Russian activists released from jail after protesting against the new belarusian reactor: http://www.anti-atom.ru/en/node/1301

After leaving Areva, SIEMENS (web) cooperates with ROSATOM (web) – the russian concern, which started building the first Belarusian atomic reactor. Belarus is the most Chernobyl affected country in the world. Still more than 2 million people are living in contaminated areas there. Russia is also involved in the construction of Iranian atomic reactors. SIEMENS – what have you done? Source HERE - more about the Belarusian reactor HERE

The same costs explosion will happen in Belarus with ROSATOM and Ostrovets

Areva is building six EPR reactors in the earthquake area and nature reserve in India Jaitapur:


The EPR reactor architecture has 3000 safety flaws, according to Le Monde, March 2011 and to this factsheet:



Siemens is now a partner of ROSATOM.

ROSATOM was kicked out by Civil Society in India: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/energy/power/no-nuclear-power-plant-at-haripur-west-bengal-government/articleshow/9636544.cms

Another indian success: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/energy/power/no-nuclear-power-plant-at-haripur-west-bengal-government/articleshow/9636544.cmst

plane crash which “killed” ROSATOM experts: http://web.archive.org/web/20110626072754/http://arabnews.com/middleeast/article460576.ece

ROSATOM denies involvment in Litvinenko assasination: http://rt.com/politics/rosatom-russia-polonium-litvinenko/

ROSATOM builds the two atomic reactors in IRAN: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/16/world/middleeast/16stuxnet.html

Tell me, is it clever to let ROSATOM build an atomic reactor in Belarus?

ROSATOM (atomic reactor builder of Iran and Belarus) lost 5 nuclear scientists during plane crash: http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_theenvoy/20110623/ts_yblog_theenvoy/russian-nuclear-scientists-involved-with-iran-nuclear-facility-killed-in-plane-crash

Plus: the Ostrovets reator is build in a quake area according to the Kosmo Aero Geology Institute of Belarus / Minsk: http://www.kosmoaerogeology.by/

I and a german group visited them on June 16th 2011. Here are maps of the area:

ROSATOM is interested in working systems? No.

In Iran they wanted money and in Belarus ROSATOM is used by Russia as an instrument to take Belarus as hostage. For the next 6 – 10 years Russia and Belarus officials are going to stop democratic changes in Belarus. They are starting a war against their own people.

But the pupils of Belarus have other ideas: http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/Windenergy-Belarus-Luninetz_June2011.rar

Belarus has all the information Japan needs! http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/07/03/belarus-has-all-the-information-japan-needs/

But: Will Japan face the same fat as Belarus? http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/07/24/japan-goes-the-same-way-as-belarus-dictatorship-a-deep-insight/

Belarus loses his last piece of independence or independence in the perspective. And it’s autonomy will be lost also.
Lithuanian Geological Survey confirmed that the plant site is located on the Ostrovets tectonic break: http://ru.delfi.lt/news/live/geologicheskaya-sluzhba-ploschadka-ostroveckoj-aes-nahoditsya-na-tektonicheskom-razlome.d?id=47466545

Chernobyl’s Hostages: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/en/Novosti.html#Yr9904 – quote “What could they do in that situation? They made the most simplest decision – to return to the contaminated zones. Why? Because it is at least a week guarantee that they will have Chernobyl’s compensations for those remaining. For example, people living in zones of eviction have the right to receive 50 rubles per month (today it is about 2 USD). People working in that zones have rights to receive 300 rubles per month (it is about 12 USD). Taking into account that the average salary in Novozubkovo is 290 rubles per month, it is not difficult to imagine how such little money is important for the people.” More: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/en/Novosti.html

Lukashenko’s statements of “overcoming Chernobyl” can be found from page 47 on, http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub1001_web.pdf ONE DECADE AFTER
CHERNOBYL Summing up the Consequences of the Accident Proceedings of an International Conference Vienna, 8-12 April 1996

How much of the Russian electricity Belarus consumes, where it comes from. Will the Russians build a nuclear power plant in Belarus? TUT.BY-TV shows and interview with the director of the Russian National Energy Security Foundation (Moscow), Konstantin Simonov: http://news.tut.by/economics/233585.html

The IAEA promotes nuclear energy worldwide.

The IAEA is thus promoting the proliferation.

Because also in the “axis of evil states” (quote Bush Administration, USA) like Iran and Belarus, atomic energy programs are starting. The IAEA was in Minsk while the construction contract was signed.

So, the IAEA also delievers the reason to start war.

This is how it works:

  • 1st, the 2002 Nuclear Posture Review
  • 2nd, the National Security Strategies of 2002
  • 3rd, the 2006 National Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction

These 3 papers will be used as a reason to start a war.

Plus: The atomic facilities of Iran are underground.

Possible atomic attack against Iran is inevitable:


Belarus – the most irradiated Chernobyl country – can not only kill with radiation: http://livewire.amnesty.org/2011/09/26/end-the-death-penalty-in-belarus/langswitch_lang/en/



Read Full Post »

Older Posts »


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 80 other followers