For a clean future

The MONEY machine Atomic Power 67 € per KWh!

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

The nuclear industry can cope with a disaster like Chernobyl every year. “(H. Blix, Director of the IAEA, 1986)

ARTICLE STARTS:

The money machine / Source: https://www.taz.de/Besuch-beim-Physiker-Sebastian-Pflugbeil/!82695/

The physicist Sebastian Pflugbeil a radical critic of the nuclear industry. His Society for Radiological Protection was the first one worldwide, which said “meltdown in Fukushima”.

His website: http://www.gfstrahlenschutz.de/

Mr. Pflugbeil welcomes us into his beautiful old building in “Berlin-Mitte”. We drink tea and speak only a little. He is very quiet, almost gentle. You could fall for that, but he is a bulky and tough obstructionists. After Fukushima he was brought out of retirement and asked in front of the television cameras. His Society for Radiation Protection had spoken first about a meltdown in Fukushima. Very soon, however, were his remarks too open and he disappeared into his contemplation. In which he has set up as a critic of nuclear energy. He is an outlaw, we say: bird freelance. From time to time, to regenerate, he makes house music with his daughters and his mother played on the harpsichord. Otherwise, he focuses on the causes and consequences of the radioactive disaster. The day before he came straight back from Fukushima.

“It was the summer of first visits by the Japanese with us, they have looked at what we – or the west -. That time made after Chernobyl with the measuring points which equipment you need, how to deal with what you need in logistics and there has now taken place, a return visit and I’m there from the experience told and from what I’ve gathered on Chernobyl is also on the subsequent health problems in Western Europe, so even health -.. and that’s an important point – at relatively little additional radiation exposure. . the danger is always denied I think the first health problems that will occur in Fukushima first, are: stillbirth, Down’s syndrome, thyroid cancer.

There now arise independent radiation monitoring stations from citizens’ groups, because the government will and not in a position to inform the population about how high the radiation and food loads. The first scientists to come out from their strongholds and even give lectures on the basics of radiation problems. At the beginning of September there were a sponsored by the Nippon Foundation experts’ symposium in Fukushima City on the health dangers of radioactivity, the expected, like, totally downplayed.Subsequently a disgruntled citizen initiatives and critical scientists in October, a counter-conference organized to raise awareness of the real dangers. I was there as a speaker. This year’s 9/11 will be Japan’s 2nd Fukushima! WARNING! The International Expert Symposium in Fukushima - Radiation and Health Risks - September 11-12, 2011, Fukushima Medical University: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/09/10/this-years-911-will-be-japans-2nd-fukushima-warning/

Counterattack with CRMS website and Pflugbeil:

Oct 12th 2011: Fukushima: International Conference of Citizens and Scientists – docs & media 市民・科学者国際会議: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/10/14/oct-12th-2011-fukushima-international-conference-of-citizens-and-scientists-docs-media/

quote: “In the symposium, “scientific findings” showing low radiation doses are safe were presented in order to “address concerns with the effects of radiation” among the general public, while the “Conclusion and Recommendations” presented at the end offered no proposals or advices to minimize exposure and reduce possible disabilities. All this reminds us of what the IAEA and other UN organizations did with the International Chernobyl Project and the Chernobyl Forum about the health effect of the Chernobyl nuclear accident. The International Chernobyl Project concluded in 1991″

Donate for independent radiation measurements in Japan! CRMS / Project 47.http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/08/16/donate-for-independent-radiation-measurements-in-japan-crms-project-47/

Citizen’s Radioactivity Measuring Station gets support from indepdendent CRIIRAD France and now from German Dr. Sebastian Pflugbeil, president of the Society for Radiation Protection – physicist and former Minister: http://www.n-tv.de/panorama/Die-Angst-wohnt-in-Fukushima-article4055351.html Quote from the article “Dr. Pflugbeil particularly recommends the citizens’ initiative to build their own registers of diseases…” Quote by Wataru Iwata (japanese composer): “The high radiation levels in the reactor of Fukushima are proof that nothing is under control,” He came with Aya Fukushima Marumori to Berlin to show the work of their citizens ‘initiative “Citizens’ Radioactivity Measuring Station” (CRMS)” e-mail of Pflugbeil: Pflugbeil.KvT@t-online.de

There were also a number of events, north to southern Japan by Fukushima. Everywhere we met with women who have left their infants from Fukushima. It is very difficult for all concerned. There are also hurdles of bureaucracy and financial problems. The salary can say that the cat wears away on the tail. That’s € 8000 or so. If I understand correctly, this is far from the NPP operator Tepco has been paid. As the petty cash was then probably all of them. “(The applicant must complete a 60-page form, for which there is a 100-page manual. Note GG)

“Just as we came departed out of this, that in an affluent Tokyo neighborhood exposure to electromagnetic radiation has been found that hair’s breadth below the threshold for evacuation. If the officials say it’s hot underneath, then it’s hot sure about it! It is still debated. I have from the roof of a skyscraper taken a sample, but I am looking now for a laboratory. The Japanese government is currently in the problem solving one, adventurous’ thrust, it makes propaganda that remove all prefectures in Japan, a part of the contaminated waste and disposed of in incinerators. But they are not designed for the retention of radioactive dirt. The effect is like a vacuum cleaner around just wrong. The dirt is blown into the air and distributed throughout Japan. This is so idiotic. ” (On 3 November, a train has arrived in Tokyo with debris – it was forbidden to measure the radiation -., They were burned at the Tokyo Waterfront Recycle Power, a subsidiary of Tepco, the operator of the nuclear plant in Fukushima.

“It stirs in Japan now more and more resistance. Even if the education is systematically obstructed. Even when politicians publicly on camera contaminated food stuff or drink a glass of water from a puddle of Fukushima Daiichi and-tell about Little Red Riding Hood and the Wolf ‘ . People believe the government and Tepco nothing more. The disaster was so long it was, at the center. With us you have been surprised that the people staying there so calm in the face of the actual disaster. The indifference of the Japanese population nuclear power plants but has a tradition that is not an oversight or stupidity. This has been done over a long period of time.

An early example I saw in the atomic bomb museum in Hiroshima. There is an exhibition of early photographs, because the entire ground floor was one big propaganda event for the nuclear power. And there are reasons: The museum was built after the end of the information barrier in the fifties – the U.S. had indeed a complete news blackout imposed after the bombing, no photos, no reports, no news. Medical documentation was top secret. But then seeping through gradually, so the early fifties, and the Americans feared that their nuclear strategies may be hindered by public opinion. You have searched for a solution and since then has invented Eisenhower before the United Nations in 1953 “Atoms for Peace” program, to rest in the shade in this wind continues to build nuclear bombs can. In this context, he has said something in a small group, which will then automatically transferred all nuclear states – to date: Keep them guessing about nuclear fission and nuclear fusion. You, that was the world’s attention.

MORE about Atoms For Peace: Low radiation kills everything: Trees, children, weather, green energy, peace, climate, democracy, mind, science: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/08/09/low-radiation-kills-everything-trees-children-green-energy-peace-climate-democracy-mind-science/

50 years brainwashing

The Americans have bribed the entire Japanese newspapers for years that they distinguish carefully: bomb and nuclear power. And that they make propaganda for nuclear power plants. This has been driven for a lot of money. This targeted brainwashed by the Americans worked more than 50 years, but gradually become more and more ineffective to Fukushima. Only now many have begun to talk about and think. Also, the hibakusha organizations, so the surviving atomic bomb victims. Meanwhile, the majority of the population against nuclear power plants and wants to be out. The government instigated from and talks vaguely of long-term exit from power saving, and lets the people in the dark about the radiation exposure. The operators of the Japanese nuclear power plants brace themselves, of course, on the other hand, they do not want to give up so much money.

In Japan, they have more than 50 nuclear power plants, many of them are already older. Fukushima one was already 40 years. As long as everything works, then plays a depreciated one NPP per day up to one million euros (€). This is purely a money machine. And even if something happens, then the operators have long brought their sheep into the dry and the citizens have the damage, as seen in Japan. When NPP jumps in like a systemically important banks in a crisis state. Tepco was to avert the bankruptcy and to pay compensation from a government fund was 8.4 billion euros. “(It needs, the company said in the next ten years further 23.3 billion, etc., to” the consequences of the disaster to cope. “Note GG)

“Nuclear power plants are usually not insured once adequate. With us it is so that they must take out liability insurance over two billion euros, not individually, all together! Have professionals through calculated how high the insurance policy would have to be, and that would be so high that the electricity price would increase from today 16 to 20 cents up to about 67 € (!) per KWh. So that would be just flat. If the exit, which has now been decided to Fukushima for us, really wanted him not until 2022 drags on, then an adequate insurance would suffice as a rest completely. That would be the immediate off! Since no operator could also go to court against the shutdown, and against anything!

MORE:  http://atomhaftpflicht.de/

But if we now let’s see the whole history of development, then clearly the military aspect was the focus. That was the driving torque. This later economic interest in nuclear power, which was at the big energy companies did not initially present. They had to be there wearing almost executed to build any nuclear power plants. And the motive why the was so driven, with huge government subsidies, for me that is as safe as the Amen in the church: the NPP were, as already mentioned, on an excellent diversion from the rays of problems and of the will, undisturbed expand the military site offers.

There was no scruples. In connection with the nuclear weapons program in the United States has also made experiments on human beings, from the fifties till seventies, for risk research. It has been injected as blacks in the arms hospitals plutonium without their knowledge, of course, to see what effect this has. “(Scientists from Harvard and MIT have distributed the 1946 mentally and 1956 to people with disabilities in school radioactively contaminated breakfast. Anm . GG) “in the mid 90s in the U.S. is such a great commission was set up, which has everything rolled up. If you read the reports, is one bad! To date, reference is made in terms of plutonium on these studies’.

MORE: Dark History: Plutonium Experiments by Wright Langham: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/05/28/dark-history-plutonium-experiments-by-wright-langham/

Just as the Russians. Semipalatinsk – - For example, the nuclear weapons test site in Kazakhstan was chosen deliberately by the father of the Russian atomic bomb ‘Kurchatov and Beria, the secret service chief. You have chosen the area, not because there is a desert, but because it was pleasantly crowded. They have used the population as a guinea pig, have said them, when the earth shakes, let them go once beautiful houses from the outside, so that they can not think of bars on the head. They have done their tests and then meticulously examines the people. Only been investigated. Not treated! So the extent of the perfidy and brutality is almost unbelievable, on both sides, because the great powers have done nothing wrong. MORE: http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/11/kazakhstans_radioactive_legacy.html

Of course that was all top secret. Worldwide, there has always been to block the primary task of governments, to date, all information or downplay that might somehow reflect badly on the use of nuclear energy. And on both the military and civil use. Act accordingly, the international organizations or commissions, such as IAEA, WHO, ICRP, etc. with their information and their policy recommendations. For example, independent experts from around the world went from 1.8 million dead who have died in the aftermath of Chernobyl and will die. The IAEA, however, spoke of 50 deaths of the super-meltdown. In the determination of radiation levels will be decided after the interests of the nuclear industry. From the Medical ago which is an absolute disaster. I think these people that are active in such bodies and the risks and explain away down count for absolutely dangerous. On my bar are much more dangerous than the NPP itself!

MORE: W.H.O. Secretary General “Margaret Chan” admits for the first time: RADIATION IS ALWAYS DANGEROUS http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/05/12/w-h-o-secretary-general-chan-admits-for-the-first-time-in-52-years-radiation-is-always-dangerous/

Also meet with us the people who sit in these reactor safety and radiation protection committees, all confidential documents you do not get nothing! We have searched for years for the causes of leukemia in Elbmarsch and Geesthacht. And of those people that have hindered it, even from the research center, there has still not unpacked. Her gag order until the end of life is associated with the pension, apparently. The nuclear research centers are the way of nuclear phase-exempt. They have all been renamed several times and are now united in the Helmholtz Association. The word nuclear, nuclear energy, or later, appeared no more. They are now called simply the Helmholtz Centre for … But at Geesthacht, there we have even more to hide than the accident and the 1986th As the trail leads right back to the story in the German atomic bomb research to the Nazis. ” I take it together sometime short of 1956, nuclear physicists, nuclear scientists and explosives experts along with the physicist E. Bagge Diebner of the Society for nuclear energy and shipping (GKSS) in Geesthacht (on the former site of Dynamit Nobel): Both had, as Heisenberg and his group, the uranium project, the secret nuclear weapons program under the Nazis and the SS Army Ordnance Department worked, but were second or 3rd Garnish. Otto Hahn, Heisenberg and von Weizsäcker did not achieve the 1st nuclear explosion, but Diebner. He will was the first one, in 1945 in Thüringen (Germany) – and succeded with a “small” nuclear explosion in the concentration Camp. Prisoners were used as experimental subjects and killed.Diebner and Bagge never ceased to occupy themselves with nuclear weapons. They have the “Göttingen appeal” of the German nuclear physicists (including those from the NS-uranium project) is not the only one signed. This commitment, “not to manufacture, testing, or to participate in the use of nuclear weapons” would run counter to their research. They gave out for the GKSS the journal Nuclear Energy, in which their research results during the Nazi period were presented with pride

MORE INFO: http://www.strahlentelex.de/Stx_05_436_S03-04.pdf AND: http://www.nuclear-free.com/deutsch/pflugbeil.htm

AND: http://www.strahlentelex.de/Stx_05_436_S01-03.pdf

Accident in Geesthacht

30 years after its founding, there was an unexplained accident or fire on the grounds of the GKSS Geesthacht nuclear research facility. He was immediately played down and covered up. That was in 1986. In the nineties it was there then the “world’s most notable accumulation of leukemic children in the vicinity of nuclear facilities.” To their education in 1992, an independent eight-member Commission was established officially leukemia of Schleswig-Holstein. The high-profile commission consisted of experts from the fields of environmental toxicology, radiation biology, physics, nuclear medicine, medicine and biochemistry. She worked for twelve years volunteers and found in environmental samples nuclear-engineered “PAC-microspheres,” which suggested illegal military experiments. 2004 occurred, unnerved by permanent disabilities and from “a wall of silence”, six of the eight members of the Commission. They wrote their own final report in which it admitted the causation of the NPP crumbs to the leukemia while, but the critical contamination on secret nuclear experiments in the special area of research reactor led back. This result is a thorough analysis was dismissed as baseless conspiracy theory and discarded. Prof. Lengfelder, founder of the Society for Radiological Protection and the Otto Hug Radiation Institute (for Chernobyl Aid), radiation biologist and physician, a man with extensive Chernobyl experience, spoke of “mechanisms of concealment and suppression of political, scientific, economic and state administration “. Another member, the biochemist Prof. Scholz in Munich, called it “cronyism between science, politics and industry,” and withdrew.

MORE about Lengfelder: http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=165064803582158

Pflugbeil says: “We had to send our samples to Belarus Prof. Mironov of the International Sakharov Environmental University, Minsk – it was founded in the aftermath of Chernobyl – she has analyzed and confirmed our assumptions we have been totally disabled permanently.. by all parties including the Greens. The parents, the whole population and we were always just, Little Red Riding Hood and the Wolf told. ‘That was instructive. But there was only one example of the foreclosure and for the lies in this area. For I was an absolute example of Chernobyl, was a lie as the first minute goal-directed, there were only a total ban on information from all ministries and the KGB, then an official version, which we all know.

I want now to the second Sarcophagus come to speak, because it does not serve to disguise a dangerous ruin, but for the concealment of dangerous lies. Since there are a lot of inconsistencies. Worldwide, for example, the version that 95 percent of the nuclear fuel still in there, and it posed a threat for Ukraine and for the whole of Western Europe. Tschetscherow has refuted this claim and it clearly goes from less than 10 percent that are still in there. He was commissioned in 2001 by the Kurchatov Institute, a research report related to the second Sarcophagus. He has investigated room by room, measured, photographed, core samples taken and has made its research report. He got a high distinction for it and the report ended up in a drawer forever! It interferes with the business.

Tschetscherow told me before we – went inside the destroyed reactor in Unit IV, as he is there crowled everywhere, even on the bottom of the reactor – accompanied by a small film crew. And that he has worked in the surveying of the lower part there for five hours. He said there were only 200 tons, 20 tons, perhaps, but realistically is 10 tons. In the other case they would have been so dead as a doornail. When we were in there, that was an uneasy feeling for me. The sound of the instruments, no light, you had to watch where you step on this climb and you never knew whether or not the same as a concrete chunk falls down from above. There are a thousand different rooms accessible in these ruins, heavily damaged. At the bottom of the reactor pot, I’d say of them that some debris that have fallen down from the upper chamber. We climbed over it since. Under it’s even different rooms in which at some points even these elephants ‘feet’ to see the molten material. Tschetscherow has shown us all and the movie people have taken it.

In the reactor pot was nothing. It’s all been thrown out with tremendous force into a short and violent explosion, which was so strong that it has lifted the 2,000-ton concrete lid. So the energy source is nuclear energy have been clearly and the explosion was a nuclear explosion! The Western world – where is yes, nuclear power plants and nuclear weapons which are completely different – wants to admit it, because otherwise would clarify that a nuclear power plant with a nuclear explosion can destroy itself. But in the textbook, there is a nuclear power plant can not. But it can.

One must ask, who benefits from the new sarcophagus, a thing of vast scale high, 100 meters, 250 meters breadth? By June 2011, Ukraine has received financial commitments of € 685 million. A large part of the international aid funds from the Chernobyl fund flows back to firms from donor countries. All the major international companies in the nuclear industry in Chernobyl are already in business. The total cost is currently estimated at 1.6 billion euros. This is issued for something that is unnecessary. And on the other hand, is designed to have virtually no cents for medical and welfare cases that are pending there. In March 2011, former liquidators were demonstrating against the reduction of their financial contributions.

These scissors we wanted to show the film. Was sent a couple of times in 2002 on ZDF. “Chernobyl, millions coffin.” On the Internet you can look at on youtube be the patched. Before the first broadcast of the German partner for the sarcophagus, the Society of Nuclear Safety has tried to intervene with the ZDF director, and to prevent the broadcast. But you can now say anything publicly, without consequence.

ABOUT Sebastian Plfugbeil:

Dr. Sebastian Pflugbeil, a physicist, a radical critic of the nuclear industry and president of Society for Radiological Protection d. e. V., born in 1947 in Bergen / Rügen. School and high school in Greifswald (GDR) from 1966 to 1971 study of physics ad Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University of Greifswald. Then employees d. f. Central Institute Cardiovascular Research ad Academy of Sciences in Berlin-Buch. His doctoral work was begun there hampered because of dissident remarks and recognized only by d. turn, nevertheless, he remained uncomfortable and stubborn. He was co-founded in 1989 d. New Forum and sat as a representative of the round-table d. GDR. In February 1990 he became minister without portfolio id Modrow government. He compiled a dossier on fd Volkskammer serious security shortcomings of nuclear power plants, which led to the closure of nuclear power plants VEB Kombinat “Bruno Leuschner” Greifswald nuclear power plant Rheinsberg d. uz closure. 1990-94 he was a member of NF d. d. Berlin House of Representatives. Since 1993, d. Chairman association “Children of Chernobyl”. He worked together with the Schleswig-Holstein commission to investigate the leukemia cases in the Elbmarsch and Geesthacht. D. From 1999 President Society for Radiological Protection e. V. 2001, he was accompanied by Russian scientist d. Tschetscherow under the sarcophagus at Chernobyl destroyed Unit IV (d. direct inspection reactor pot), he found confirmation of d. Tschetscherows heretical assertion, Most of that d. d. d. explosion of radioactive material in 1986 was thrown out. Pflugbeil speaks fluent Russian and made about 90 trips to the affected regions, talked with numerous scientists, liquidators and other stakeholders, both reported on technical and d. d. d. catastrophic social consequences (most recently in Japan). Since March 2011 intensive study of Fukushima, on a several-week visit to Japan, he gave lectures and met with scientists and citizens’ initiatives. Pflugbeil lives in Berlin. His wife is an internist, they have four grown daughters. His father was a church musician in Greifswald, his mother harpsichordist.

MORE: http://www.chernobylcongress.org/speakers/artikel/4dd2fa3d436f621b58642ac1257685b6/sebastian-pflugbeil.html

FUKUSHIMA DIARY: Dr. Sebastian Pflugbeil “Tokyo is on the path of Kiev”http://fukushima-diary.com/2011/12/dr-sebastian-pflugbeil-tokyo-is-on-the-path-of-kiev/

with kind regards,

Jan Hemmer

CASTOR: La Hague emitting 1 Million Curie of Tritium EACH YEAR

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

English LIVE ticker: http://linksunten.indymedia.org/de/node/50895

La Hague is extremely unprofitable. It’s one of the most irradiated areas on the planet.

This is where german CASTOR radioactive waste transports are being reprocessed – the largest amount then goes to “Gorleben” (map),

an Emergency interim camp for this violent deadly waste – because no repository is possible.
The first PUREX nuclear fuel reprocessing facilities were built in the USA.

Reprocessing plants operate mostly with military plutonium. They are an invention of the military. And the used PUREX method is an invention of the military also.
La Hague emits, with the support of the CASTOR, more than 1,000,000 CURIE of Tritium each Year:

DOWNLOAD: “La Hague” emits 1 MILLION CURIE PER YEAR. Remember: 1 Curie per km² = 37,000 Bequerel per m². AND: 20 Bequerel per Kg IN the body cause Heart Prolems and can lead to death. Download and Upload and share. Basic knowledge for pro human activism: “Chance for children carcinogenic tritium emissions from each reactor every second: 100%” – first two pages are from a 300 pages long german document (not for the public): http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/Tritium-DWK-LaHague-ChildrenCancer.pdf

Near Chernobyl there are 1,000 Curie per m² soil.

MORE La Hague emissions: http://exacteditions.theecologist.org/exact/browse/307/308/6476/3/52/0/

Their main purpose is to Produce Plutonium: www.youtube.com/watch?v=F0_6V-5BGSs produced MOX fuel / Fukushima.

Sellafield is going to be closed: http://apps.facebook.com/theguardian/environment/2011/aug/03/sellafield-mox-plant-close

TEPCO says: Radioactive material outside reactor does not belong to TEPCO: http://ajw.asahi.com/article/behind_news/social_affairs/AJ201111240030

CASTOR INFO:

CASTOR is waiting for eternity, beacause storing in salt won’t work: “Even during the scheduled operating time of the repository of 50 years, resulting in rock salt to the high-level radioactive waste around large quantities of metallic sodium and gaseous chlorine. This mixture is of considerable urgency. Sodium is so reactive that it will only be kept in a particularly inert liquids such as kerosene can. With air, it burns at higher temperatures to sodium peroxide. If it comes along with water, it reacts violently with formation of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and hydrogen (H²). Both reactions can proceed explosively. From the sodium hydroxide is produced in conjunction with additional water corrosive caustic soda, which together with chlorine itself can attack steel.” Source: http://www.castor.de/technik/endlager/natur8503.html

CASTOR measurement protocoll of “Deutsche Bahn”: http://www.castor.de/diskus/castor/messprotogross.gif

official data in micro sievert per hour: 20-70 MikroSv / h (official data) from 2 meters distance to Castor – 20 microSv is 175 millisievert per year. And that’s the equivalent of 400 mammograms. : http://www.strahlentherapie.uni-bonn.de/strahlen_info.htm

Gorleben Castor Resistance in Germany 2011 – Nuclear Heritage

Police on high alert: http://storyful.com/stories/1000014479

25,000 people are on the street and railways: http://www.bi-luechow-dannenberg.de/chronologisch/pressemitteilungen/uber-25-000-menschen-im-wendland

80 % of german populaton AGAINST nuclear power: http://www.pressetext.com/news/20110620015

CASTOR LIVE REPORT RADIO (top right PLAY): http://castorticker.de/

As you read this, tents of Germany’s Green politicians are NOW pitched at the atomic waste Castor route, near “Pisselberg/Dannenberg” says Stefan Wenzel – Leader of the Greens in the federal state of Lower Saxony: “#Gruene Landtagsfraktion hat jetzt Lager in Pisselberg/Dannenberg an #Castor Strecke aufgeschlagen. #AntiAKW #Gorleben #BDK11″ SOURCE: http://twitter.com/?ref=nf&utm_campaign=AssePUAInf…

CASTOR rail wagon: “2 mSv / HOUR on surface” legal limit for citizens in Germany: “1 mSv per YEAR” http://www.castor.de/diskus/castor/dosis1.html

Radiation protection norms are a HOAX: “Since 1950, more than 90,000 of the survivors of the atomic bombings at Hiroshima and Nagasaki have been enrolled in a lifetime study of their health. The study, first conducted by the Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission (ABCC), was transferred in 1975 to control by the Radiation Effects Research Foundation (RERF), which has its headquarters at 5-2 Hijiyama Park, Minami-Ku, Hiroshima 732, Japan. and true magnitude of the radiation risk. RERF is equally funded by the government of Japan through its Ministry of Health and Welfare and by the government of the United States via the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) under contract with the Department of Energy (DOE)…” http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/RIC/chp4F.html

From our visit to Gorleben (CASTOR waste disposal) in April 2011, with Chernobyl Children & youths:

Countess of Bernstorff is a private applicant against the atomic waste disposal “Gorleben” (german federal state Niedersachsen):

with kind regards,

Jan Hemmer

The Atomic Reactor Explosions of Fukushima and Chernobyl – updated

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

The possibility of an atomic explosion in an atomic reactor is well hidden and ignored by common science, mostly servants and getting direct feed from the atomic industry.

Dear Readers: There is a mightier power than an earthquake. It’s called “nuclear explosion”. And it can happen in each reactor. No reactor withstands this. If the burst protection of a reactor can not include an explosion in a reactor, then this contradicts the construction specifications. No reactor should not have been built. So, every operating license is an illusion and illegal. Therefore, the nuclear explosion in a reactor  is denied by the nuclear industry, so that the reactors be allowed to continue and can be built.

From the book “History of the British nuclear industry” by Margaret Gowing, “Britain and Atomic Energy”, on page 382 the former  U.S. water-cooled graphite reactor at Hanford is described:
“To be built in view of the risks of an accident, the reactor is at an isolated location. Because water absorbs neutrons, and when the water flow is interrupted and the control rods do not occur immediately in action, the water evaporates in the cooling system and can no longer absorb the neutrons . These neutrons were therefore available to increase the fission rate in the reactor, which is super critical with power. The temperature rises, the fuel evaporated and the radioactivity is spreading widely. “

On page 385 we find the position:
“The gas cooling is to avoid the risk of severe supercritical state …”

So the knowledge of the danger of a atomic explosion that can occur in a water-cooled graphite-gas reactor, is as old as the principle of the reactor itself.

# Would the people be aware that the Chernobyl explosion was an atomic explosion, it would attract the public to make a link between civilian and military atomic energy, which credibility and image of the nuclear industry would put an irreparable blow

# An atomic explosion in a reactor can rule out the provisions contrary to nuclear safety. Consequently, reactors should be shut down.

Once the atomic bomb explodes, it is gone. Once an atomic reactor explodes, it’s emitting radiation for eternity.

Forgotten: The 1975 version of Fukushima and Chernobyl in Leningrad: Meltdown and 1.5 million Curie of activity got into the environment. Tons of liquid radioactive waste were discharged into the Baltic Sea by the Leningrad Nuclear Power Plant (RBMK type like CHERNOBYL): http://www.greenworld.org.ru/?q=ang_lnpp1_main – two RBMK 1000 Chernobyl reactors are still running! Planned Shutdown: 2018 & 2020.

by Sergej Mirnyi, (http://www.mirnyi.arwis.com/) Engineer, chemist, liquidator at IPPNW congress Vienna 1996: http://wilpfinternational.org/publications/Tchernobyl_consequences.pdf – page 23: The picture of the contamination by nuclear tests over Nevada looked like an octopus. The image of the radiation on the reactor at Chernobyl Unit IV looked like a Radioactive Mount Everest, the top of the concentrated area around the reactor was around, from its center was a long, thin trace, a second was wide and covered the entire eastern Belarus.

Nuclear explosions caused the Chernobyl disaster – page 22: http://www.scribd.com/doc/33726185/Peace-Researcher-Vol2-Issue09-June-1996

From Fukushima-Diary.com: Yellow light was seen when reactor 3 exploded: http://fukushima-diary.com/2011/11/yellow-light-was-seen-when-reactor-3-exploded/#comment-28709

and: http://enenews.com/breaking-officials-investigating-meltdowns-question-whether-nuclear-explosions-destroyed-fukushima-reactors-tepco-not-in-a-position-to-comment

Japanese Engineer: “There Was a Nuclear Explosion in Reactor 3 in Addition to a Hydrogen Explosion”.

Arnie Gundersen, C.Busby are not alone. The knowledge about the atomic explosion in an atomic reactor is as old as the principle of the atomic reactor itself.

Chernobyl and Fukushima were atomic explosions:

Cobalt 60 was detected in Kashiwa shi of Chiba. It proves reactor 3 had an atomic explosion, and it proves gov / tepco are still hiding most important facts.It’s very natural to think there may be way more things concealed: http://10401.blog.fc2.com/blog​-entry-88.htm (now taken offline). But they also found Cobalt 60 in seafood: http://www.scribd.com/doc/65128490/GreenPeace-Fukushima-Seafood-Results

Chernobyl too, but this is IGNORED by today’s science: http://tekknorg.wordpress.​com/2011/03/16/fukushima-c​hernobyl-unofficial-data/

Dr. Chris Busby Believes Fukushima Was A Nuclear Explosion : http://www.rense.com/general93/chrisbsy.htm (link now correct)

AND: University of Innsbruck says Chernobyl was primarily caused by a NUCLEAR EXPLOSION – Page 1, left: translation: “… the one Nuclear explosion, and finally a meltdown followed by “: http://physik.uibk.ac.at/p​hysik4/tschernobyl/2-Der_U​nfall.pdf AND: “Some specialists are sure that after the steam explosion a nuclear explosion similar to an atomic bomb explosion occurred in the core of the 4th Unit .
It’s power had to be much higher than power of the steam explosion. The conclusion of the authors is based on experimental findings established by studying of activities of isotopes 133Xe and 133Xem in the air that existed in the first days after the Chernobyl accident. Their study was carried out in the city Cherepovets that is about 1,000 km in north direction from the Chernobyl NPP.
The authors could find that the ratio of activities of these isotopes is the same as in the case of nuclear explosion.” SOURCE: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr79/kr79pdf/Malko1.pdf —

I suspect nearly every analysis on the Chernobyl explosions to be downplayed. nearly every analysis talks about: 2,000°C temperature increase of the fuel. why? because if they stay at 2,000°c then they can remain their false statement of a “hydrogen-and / or steam-explosion”. the experts and scientist learned all their life, that 2,000°C is the maximum of fuel / melting / temperature increase during a reactor accident. But it is not true: reactors like the NERVA (Nuclear Engine for Rocket Vehicle Application) – a NASA / NRC joint venture, can develop more than that: quote “Continuously measured the in-pile thermal Fuel Compounds conductivity of high-density UO2 fuel at temperatures up to 2,200 degrees Celsius.” from: http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4533/Plum%20Brook%20Complete.pdf this sounds like this russian analysis that described the chernobyl reactor core as a rocket: “Two different models of the nuclear explosions are known. According to, the core of the Chernobyl reactor transformed to a turbo-jet solid-phase engine after a very short initial overheating of fuel. It flied like a missile from the reactor vault to the central reactor hall by the hydrodynamic forces of gas-phase streams flushing down from the fuel channels. Then it exploded as an atomic bomb in the spaceof the central hall.” source: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr79/kr79pdf/Malko1.pdf leading to: http://nuclearhistory.wordpress.com/2011/09/05/mikhail-malko-national-academy-of-sciences-of-belarus-nuke-explosion-at-chernobyl/

PLEASE CLICK AT THESE TWO FILES:

Chernobyl was like a W45 Warhead: http://books.google.de/books?id=I3_oaypyhB8C&pg=PA165&lpg=PA165&dq=US+warhead+W54&source=bl&ots=7NtOL9qyMA&sig=p0dXQQuITX9ltmYMsyXqwEmWGi8&hl=de&ei=9q3QTrq8OOTk4QS3-c1T&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=10&ved=0CG4Q6AEwCQ#v=onepage&q=US%20warhead%20W54&f=false

http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/ReactorNuclearExplosion.pdf

More in: “Martinez Val, Jose M., Aragones, Jose M., Mingues, Emilio, Perlado, Jose M., Velarade, Guillermio. An Analysis of the Physical Causes of the Chernobyl Accident. Nuclear Technology. Vol. 90, June 1990, pp.371 – 378.”: http://life-upgrade.com/DATA/Artikel%20zu%20Tschernobyl%20in%20Nuclear%20Technology%20Vol%2090.pdf

SAME SITUATION AS IN CHERNOBYL IN EVERY FAST BREEDER!

http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/fast-breeder.pdf

Excerpt: Chernobyl explosion released 1,200 Gigajoules: http://books.google.de/books?id=pAsAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA61&dq=1200+gigajoules&hl=de&ei=oiLMTsfSNJGyhAfXh5ivDQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CDsQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=1200%20gigajoules&f=false <- ATOMIC EXPLOSION. Steam explosion: Maxium -> 50 Gigajoules. More: http://books.google.de/books?id=vgwAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA65#v=onepage&q&f=false

Also mentioned in the 1987 released paper by NRC “NUREG 1250″: http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML0716/ML071690245.pdf

H. van Dam. says: “900 Gigajoules”: http://iopscience.iop.org/0034-4885/55/11/003

Chernobyl: NO HYDROGEN NO CHEMICAL EXPLOSION – it was too Hot!: http://books.google.de/books?id=QGlMb5wXs5sC&pg=PA174#v=onepage&q=arnott&f=false

4000 – 5000 ° K: http://books.google.de/books?id=oEqd0IeAhccC&pg=PA6&hl=de&source=gbs_selected_pages&cad=3#v=snippet&q=4000&f=false

Explosion yield of Chernobyl 0,2 – 0,3 KiloTons. Model of the Destruction of the Reactor in the No. 4 Unit of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant – by Kiselev, A. N. | Checherov, K. P.: http://discover-decouvrir.cisti-icist.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/dcvr/ctrl?action=shwart&aix=8&aid=2485630

Jack Harris Central Electricity Generating Board nuclear metallurgist acceptsof his colleague Ross Hesketh’s view of nuclear explosion in Chernobyl: Page7  http://www.spokesmanbooks.com/Spokesman/PDF/91Gifford.pdf More about Ross Hesketh: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/obituaries/ross-hesketh-549777.html

Commander Robert Green, at IPPNW Chernobyl congress 1996 in Vienna (from Hinkley Point hearing report 1990): starting at page 29: http://wilpfinternational.org/publications/Tchernobyl_consequences.pdf

Robert Green’s aunt was murdered: http://www.hildamurrell.org While she was on her way preparing to present her paper  An Ordinary Citizen’s View of Radioactive Waste Management 

She was advised by Don Arnott: http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/2000/jan/13/guardianobituaries – a nuclear physicist who refused on principle to join Britain’s atom bomb programme. He said, Chernobyl was a nuclear explosion of the reactor type!

What a connection! Why was she murdered?

The same today in Japan: Anti nuclear town councilor died in undetermined manner

The atomic industrial-military complex fears the TRUTH!

Chernobyl was a nuclear explosion in the yield of about 0.3 kilotons (there are nuclear weapons which are below this yield). Nothing, no architecture in the world could stand up to this. That the nuclear industry can not rule out a nuclear explosion in a reactor contradicts the regulations for nuclear safety. Consequently, all reactors should be shut down.

The knowledge of the danger of a nuclear explosion in a water-cooled reactor type is so old as the principle of the reactor itself

“Valery A. Legasov” – who was the first russian official who spoke about Chernobyl to the IAEA in 1986, and committed suicide. Before his death he made an audiotape, with untold facts about the Chernobyl explosion. Here are the abstracts of his tapes: “About the accident at Chernobyl” by Academician VA Legasov (text from the 4 cassettes) – in russian: http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/Legasov_V._Ob_Avarii_Na_Chernobiylsk.pdf

His 5 hours long speech at the IAEA 1996 meeting about Cherbobyl was ignored: http://books.google.de/books?id=S-SsDtZG5WgC&pg=PA51&dq=new+scientist+valery+legasov&hl=de&ei=Lx_MTuu-BMaEOqb9uKYP&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CDMQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false

The RBMK reactor at Chernobyl has prevented that the explosion was bigger, which would have made western reactors, because the total closure under pressure, the force of the explosion would have increased. The weight of the lid which was blown up was 2000 tons (was not welded). In England, at least one scenario exists for a nuclear explosion in a gas-cooled Reactor. Would be known in the public that the Chernobyl explosion was a nuclear explosion, the public would draw a connection between civilian and military nuclear energy, which would damage irreparable the credibility and image of the nuclear industry.

Continue reading until PDF page 33, where liquidator and physicist Youli Andreev speaks, he has seen the Fuel , which was destroyed from the inside out. This is the evidence for an atomic explosion in Chernobyl. Starting at page 33 http://wilpfinternational.org/publications/Tchernobyl_consequences.pdf

Here is what he has to say about the IAEA: “IAEA is a FAKE organisation”: http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/15/us-japan-nuclear-chernobyl-idUSTRE72E5MV20110315

This is him: http://books.google.de/books?id=xAwAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA48&dq=Yuri+Andreev&hl=de&ei=y7nKToPJM8mM4gSMp-Rl&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CDkQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=Yuri%20Andreev&f=false -

and Page 33, by Ross Hesketh and Jury Andrejev: Unit IV reactor had a design flaw that was already known in 1983: When lifting the control rods one would risk an extremely dangerous situation: the reactor could explode due to the emergency protection. Before the accident, the staff of Unit IV had sent a letter to the leadership of the Soviet nuclear industry: The potential accident was described. But the management told the personnel is not the possibility of a nuclear explosion in the reactor, although the Designers were aware exactly. This situation exists in every large Industrial plant in the world.

On December 1984 (2 years before the explosions), Chernobyl reactor IV went critical. Reactor IV went into operation in 1983. http://guacfund.org/nss-folder/sharedpublications/NM724.pdf

Hanford in USA: There is a similar, gas-graphite reactor – producing  mainly plutonium, which is their main purpose.

That is the problem of Western reactors: The control rods are made ​​of a material -> Silver-indium-cadmium. If something goes wrong, the control rods to melt first. it is likely that you will lose the control rods rather than the core.

 

Janick Magne

Possibilité qu’une explosion nucléaire ait eu lieu à FUKUSHIMA:
Extrait des entretiens entre HATOYAMA ex premier-ministre du Japon et TAIRA, député.
(L’article complet est paru dans le magazine NATURE le 14 décembre (en ligne) et le 15 décembre (version papier)Volume:480, Pages: 313–314)

“Another question that must be answered is what caused the explosions at the site. They were initially reported as being caused by the ignition of hydrogen generated by a high-temperature chemical reaction between the alloy covering the fuel rods and the vapour in the core. But, again, this has not been settled. Other possibilities include a nuclear explosion, or the ignition of other gases.

Knowing whether a nuclear explosion took place is essential for predicting how much radioactivity might have been released, what it would have consisted of and how far it would have spread, as well as the state of the spent-fuel rods stored in a pool in unit 3. Two observations suggest that this is plausible. First, some metals heavier than uranium have been detected tens of kilometres from the plant. Second, the steel frame on top of the unit-3 reactor building is twisted, apparently as a result of melting.

“Solutions for the Fukushima nuclear disaster must be based on the worst-case scenario.”

Japan’s Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) reported finding heavy metals such as curium-242 up to 3 kilometres from the reactor site and plutonium-238 up to 45 kilometres away. These isotopes are deadly poisons if ingested, causing internal exposure to radiation. Because 242Cm has a short half-life (about 163 days), and because the concentrations of 238Pu around the plant were much higher than usual, MEXT concluded that these radionuclides were not fallout from past nuclear tests in the atmosphere, so must have come from the Fukushima reactor. If so, they suggest that broken spent-fuel rods might be scattered around the site — a considerable hazard.

Such elements are too heavy to have been borne in a plume, like the lighter caesium and iodine, so they must have been blown out with great force. Whether a hydrogen explosion would have been powerful enough to scatter heavy metals that far remains unclear. And a hydrogen explosion should not have generated enough heat to melt steel. Initially, TEPCO claimed that the explosion in unit 3 generated white smoke; on re-examination, the smoke was black, and therefore unlikely to have been caused by a pure hydrogen explosion. So a nuclear explosion is a possibility. Whether other explosive gases were present on the site would be equally important to establish.”

—-

Most important after atomic bomb attack: Masks, measuring in Micro / Milli / Sievert.

Important while reactor catastrophe: Measuring in Becquerel – often forgotten, instead people refer to Sievert.

while sievert may decrease, becquerel increase, because our organism is programmed to absorb and store things.

 

What:
> STATUS REPORT OF THE IIASA PROJECT ON ENERGY SYSTEMS 1975
http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Admin/PUB/Documents/RR-76-001.pdf

Quote P.17:
> “The next logical step is to embed residual risks in a spectrum of natural risks such as earthquakes, lightning, and the like…”

Who said this:
> Wolf Härtele, 1976, in JAPAN

Who is this:
> Swabian pastor’s son, Physicist, advocate of fast breeder technology and preferred disciple of Carl Friedrich von Weizsacker

My Source:
> Book: The Atomic State – by Robert Jungk

> Häfele impressed with this risk philosohpy also the Church and Society of the World Council of Churches, which took his arguments for the debate book “Facing Up to Nuclear Power”:
http://www.amazon.de/Facing-Nuclear-Power-Contribution-Potentialities/dp/0715203401

The end of the fast breeder program:
http://www.chernobylcongress.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/Baverstock_How_the_UN_works.pdf
> In about 1980 Gian-Carlo Pinchera, an Italian nuclear physicist, showed that fast reactors were inherently unsafe. That single conference paper led to the almost total abandonment of the fast breeder programme. (…) he warned “beware the dying kick of the nuclear advocates.” This is what we see today but maybe they are not dying!  quote by Keith Baverstock

The masters : Giancarlo Pinchera

Chemistry engineer, communist, he specialized in nuclear engineering in the USA , frequenting the Los Alamos laboratories which closed their doors to him in the middle of the Cold War.
Between 1965 and 75, he worked as a researcher at Cnen, the newly instituted National Committee for Nuclear Energy.
During these years he is in charge of security at the Casaccia Research center, at Superphénix project in France, and becomes responsible for Energy matters at PCI [probably Italian Communist Party].
He gets to know ecology litterature, from the Club de Rome reports to texts by Barry Commoner et Amory Lovins. Then arrise his first doubts about nuclear energy, with his thoughts about risks and costs linked to the atom policy and about the recurring Italian inefficiency. Then he drops his positions favorable to nuclear energy, which becomes one of the most discredited environmental techniques in Italy and abroad, until his death on 9/2/1995. Source PAGE 49: http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/Superphenix-GianCarlo-Pinchera.pdf

What:
> STATUS REPORT OF THE IIASA PROJECT ON ENERGY SYSTEMS 1975
http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Admin/PUB/Documents/RR-76-001.pdf

Quote P.17:
> “The next logical step is to embed residual risks in a spectrum of natural risks such as earthquakes, lightning, and the like…”

Who said this:
> Wolf Härtele, 1976, in JAPAN

Who is this:
> Swabian pastor’s son, Physicist, advocate of fast breeder technology and preferred disciple of Carl Friedrich von Weizsacker

My Source:
> Book: The Atomic State – by Robert Jungk

> Häfele impressed with this risk philosohpy also the Church and Society of the World Council of Churches, which took his arguments for the debate book “Facing Up to Nuclear Power”:
http://www.amazon.de/Facing-Nuclear-Power-Contribution-Potentialities/dp/0715203401

The end of the fast breeder program:
http://www.chernobylcongress.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/Baverstock_How_the_UN_works.pdf
> In about 1980 Gian-Carlo Pinchera, an Italian nuclear physicist, showed that fast reactors were inherently unsafe. That single conference paper led to the almost total abandonment of the fast breeder programme. (…) he warned “beware the dying kick of the nuclear advocates.” This is what we see today but maybe they are not dying!  quote by Keith Baverstock.

translation byVéronique Gallais The masters : Giancarlo Pinchera

Chemistry engineer, communist, he specialized in nuclear engineering in the USA , frequenting the Los Alamos laboratories which closed their doors to him in the middle of the Cold War.
Between 1965 and 75, he worked as a researcher at Cnen, the newly instituted National Committee for Nuclear Energy.
During these years he is in charge of security at the Casaccia Research center, at Superphénix project in France, and becomes responsible for Energy matters at PCI [probably Italian Communist Party].
He gets to know ecology litterature, from the Club de Rome reports to texts by Barry Commoner et Amory Lovins. Then arrise his first doubts about nuclear energy, with his thoughts about risks and costs linked to the atom policy and about the recurring Italian inefficiency. Then he drops his positions favorable to nuclear energy, which becomes one of the most discredited environmental techniques in Italy and abroad, until his death on 9/2/1995.

Source: http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/Superphenix-GianCarlo-Pinchera.pdf PAGE 49

Fast breeder reactors are the least safe: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opinion/columnists/swaminathan-s-a-aiyar/fast-breeder-reactors-are-the-least-safe/articleshow/7798202.cms?intenttarget=no

MONJU fast breeder sodium accident MOVIE: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiSqW6pFuR8

If they want to cool down a “Sodium Fast Breeder Reactor” they sould NOT use Water as in Fukushima: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqDWbknpiVk This is why fast breeder reactors are inherently UNSAFE

More of Häfele: “Technischer und wirtschaftlicher Stand sowie Aussichten der Kernenergie in der Kraftwirtschaft der BRD” http://bibliothek.fzk.de/zb/kfk-berichte/KFK1430.pdf PAGE 50:

translation:

“In the early American development of fast breeders (1945 – 1959) considerations reactor neutrons with short lifetime (10 ^ 7 sec) played  a large role (Bethe, Fermi, Teller), because with such rapid neutron lifetime, steep reactor excursions are possible, then because of its steepness in Principle for the release of large quantities suitable for mechanical destruction are likely”

“The set configuration of a fast reactor cores of principle neutron-physical reasons, not the configuration of highest criticality. Rather, a down or molten core, a core, whose center is emptied of sodium
is to be well above critical. Then it could lead to the release of large amounts of energy, which of course come from the negative double coefficient itself clearly.

MORE: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0017931069901148

AND: http://bibliothek.fzk.de/zb/kfk-berichte/KFK1020.pdf page 59: “Boiling of the coolant in the sodium-cooled fast reactions”

> Failure of the fuel rods by
Over temperature (melting of the shell) after 0.3 to 0.5 sec

> After drying out no earlier than about 3 sec (at the largest point
Power density occurs), a fuel melting.  (…) Destruction of the fuel assembly structure can be expected if
power is not switched (ie after about 1 to 2 sec).

> In a boiling fuel vapor bubbles occur on individual,
their volume with a fundamental frequency of about 2 to 3 Hz oscillates.

> The maximum of the bladder volume is nearly the entire fuel assembly with
Steam filled.

> Few tenths of a second after drying of the residual film is at the
Dry the spot Shell wall temperature heated up to failure point.

Life-Upgrade.com

Belarusian Fund “For the Children of Chernobyl” gets European Award

妊娠中の日本人女性の避難すぐ

Come to Berlin Nov. 24th 2011! My very good friend Prof. Dr. Irina Grushevaya gets this years “Women of Europe Award” for her work as founder of the Fund “for the Children of Chernobyl” http://www.europaeische-bewegung.de/index.php?id=14981 This is a very important victory for the whole Chernobyl and also Fukushima movement and Civil Society!

More about the Fund and Irina Grushevaya: VIDEO Prof. Dr. Irina Grushevaya on Chernobyl, Fukushima, Belarus – April 13th 2011, Berlin: http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/04/16/video-prof-dr-irina-grushevaya-on-chernobyl-fukushima-belarus-april-13th-2011-berlin/

About the Fund: http://www.civilsoc.org/nisorgs/belarus/chornbel.htm and book by the Fund: http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/BelarusianFundForTheChildrenOfChernobyl1996.pdf

Prof. Dr. Irina Grushevaya was invited among others to the SPD fraction event “Tschernobyl Mahnt”, among the guests was the belarusian ambassador in Berlin Apr 13th 2011, and the former german ambassador in Minsk. Grushevaya helped more than 2000.000 belarusians with concrete aid and sent more than 360,000 Chernobyl children in countries all over the world.

She was nominated for the peace nobel prize 2005, but instead the IAEA got it.

my interview with her husband and co-founder of the Fund Prof. Dr. Gennady Grushevoy:

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Life-Upgrade.com